versión impresa ISSN 0100-204X
Pesq. agropec. bras. vol.44 no.7 Brasília jul. 2009
Cell size in trays for the production of strawberry plug transplants
Tamanho das células em bandejas para produção de mudas de morangueiro
Gustavo GiménezI; Jerônimo Luiz AndrioloII; Djeimi JanischII; Carine CoccoII; Miriane Dal PicioII
IInstituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria, Las Brujas, Ruta 48, Km 10, Canelones, Uruguay. E-mail: email@example.com
IIUniversidade Federal de Santa Maria, Departamento de Fitotecnia, Campus Camobi, CEP 97105-900 Santa Maria, RS. E-mail: firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com
The objective of this work was to evaluate the influence of cell sizes used for strawberry plug production in trays compared to bare root transplants, regarding initial plant size, harvest timing, and total strawberry fruit yield. Plug transplants were produced from runner tips rooted in trays with cell sizes of 26.5, 50, 100 and 150 cm3 filled with Plantmax HA organic substrate. Bare root transplants (control) were produced in a closed soilless system using sand as substrate. A randomized block design was used, with four replicates with 16 plants per plot. Bare root transplants and plug transplants from 100-cm3 cells had larger crown and higher leaf and root dry mass. Early fruit yield was higher in plants propagated from plugs than in those propagated from bare root transplants. Spring and total fruit yield did not differ among treatments, with an average yield of 435 and 874 g per plant, respectively. Earlier strawberry fruit yield was obtained by using plug transplants, even from trays with small cells of 26.5 or 50 cm3.
Index terms: Fragaria ananassa, bare root planting, plant nursery, plant propagation.
O objetivo deste trabalho foi avaliar a influência do tamanho das células utilizadas na produção de mudas de morangueiro em bandejas, comparadas a mudas de raízes nuas, quanto ao tamanho inicial da planta, período de colheita e produção total de frutos. As mudas em bandejas foram produzidas a partir de pontas de estolões enraizadas em células de 26,5, 50, 100 e 150 cm3, com o substrato orgânico Plantmax HA. As mudas de raízes nuas (controle) foram produzidas em um sistema sem solo com areia como substrato. O delineamento experimental foi o de blocos ao acaso, com quatro repetições de 16 plantas. As mudas de bandejas com células de 100 cm3 e de raízes nuas atingiram diâmetro da coroa e massa de matéria seca de folhas e raízes mais elevadas. A produção precoce foi maior nas plantas propagadas por estolões que naquelas propagadas por raízes nuas. A produção de primavera e a total não diferiram entre os tratamentos, com média de 435 e 874 g por planta, respectivamente. A produção mais precoce de frutas foi obtida com mudas em bandejas, mesmo naquelas com células pequenas de 26,5 ou 50 cm3 de volume.
Termos para indexação: Fragaria ananassa, plantio de raiz nua, viveiro de planta, propagação vegetal.
Low quality of transplants is the main limiting factor of strawberry crops in Brazil. Stock plants from in vitro propagation are planted in soil to produce bare root transplants, and their physiological and sanitary quality is low due to contamination by pathogens like Colletotrichum, Phytophthora and Verticillium. High quality bare root transplants used in Brazil are currently imported from Argentina and Chile (Santos & Medeiros, 2003).
Soil disinfection with methyl bromide is a practice that has been used around the world to control pathogens and weeds in nurseries (Durner et al., 2002). Methyl bromide has been banned from use in Brazil, so there is scientific and commercial interest in soilless strawberry propagation methods.
Planting of strawberry in southern Brazil is done in early fall, under high levels of solar radiation and elevated air temperature. Intensive overhead irrigation is required for 1-2 weeks after transplanting (Santos & Medeiros, 2003). Many bare root transplants do not survive, leading to heterogeneous crop stands and low fruit yield. The use of containerized plug transplants is a way to avoid the need for fumigants in the propagation phase and to improve plant survival at planting (Durner et al., 2002). Plug transplants are being adopted in Europe and North America. Plants from transplants are easier to plant, require less irrigation during crop establishment, and produce higher fruit yield (Durner et al., 2002; Takeda & Hokanson, 2003; Hochmuth et al., 2006a, 2006b; Takeda & Newell, 2006).
The planting timing is an important factor for achieving full potential strawberry fruit production. The production of plug transplants can be programmed in such a way that they are available for planting at the right time (Lieten, 1998; Bish et al., 2002; Fernandez & Ballington, 2003; Hochmuth et al., 2006a). A period of about 4-5 weeks should be necessary for production of plug transplants (Durner et al., 2002), and during this time the container size can influence water and nutrient availability. Container size can affect growth of plants in soilless culture (Nesmith & Duval, 1998). The use of trays with large cell size can stimulate transplants' growth. Large cell size increases the amount of substrate, reduces the number of transplants per tray, and increases the costs of package and shipping (Durner, 1999; Bish et al., 2002; Hochmuth et al., 2006a, 2006b). The use of trays with small cells is a way of reducing the cost of transplants, but the physiological quality of the plants must not be affected (Durner et al., 2002). Data about the influence of container size in the production of strawberry plug transplants are scarce in the literature.
The objective of this work was to evaluate the influence of cell size used for strawberry plug production in trays compared to bare root transplants regarding initial plant size, harvest timing, and total strawberry fruit yield.
Materials and Methods
The experiment was carried out from April 21st to December 19th, 2006, at Departamento de Fitotecnia, Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, Brazil. Stock plants of the LBD 15.1 clone from the Strawberry Breeding Program were propagated in vitro at Laboratório de Biotecnologia, Departamento de Fitotecnia. Stock plants were acclimatized during 15 days in a screenhouse and planted in a closed soilless system using sand as growing bed.Hennion & Veschambre (1997) nutrient solution was used in mmol L-1: 12 NO3-, 2 NH4+, 6.2 K+, 2.2 H2PO4-, 1 SO42-, 1 Mg2+ and 3 Ca2+, and, in mg L-1: 0.03 Mo, 0.26 B, 0.06 Cu, 0.50 Mn, 0.22 Zn and 4.00 chelated Fe. The pH and electrical conductivity were maintained between 5.5 and 6.5 and between 1.4 and 1.5 dS m-1, respectively. The soilless system and nutrient solution management were done according to Andriolo (2007).
Treatments consisted of plug transplants produced in trays with cell volumes of 26.5, 50, 100, and 150 cm3 (V-26.5, V-50, V-100 and V-150, respectivelly). Plug transplants were produced from runner tips bearing 2-3 leaves and with crown diameters between 3.0 and 3.9 mm. They were collected on March 19th 2006, and rooted in cell trays filled with the organic substrate Plantmax HA (Eucatex, Paulínia, SP, Brazil). The plants in the trays were misted for five days (one minute of mist every hour) followed by overhead sprinkling irrigation (one minute every hour) for 27 days.
Bare root transplants produced in a closed soilless system using sand as substrate were used as control. Bare root transplants were harvested by digging in the soilless system.
A randomized block design was used, with four replicates and 16 plants per plot. The physiological quality of plug and bare root transplants at planting were determined by crown diameter and leaf and root dry mass, after drying at 60°C in a forced-air oven until constant mass. Planting was done in soil on April 21st 2006, in an annual hill system with raised beds under low 100-μm polyethylene tunnels at a density of 6.6 plants m-2. The row surface was mulched with 30 μm black polyethylene. Water and nutrients were delivered to plants by drip irrigation, according to cropping practices reported by Santos & Medeiros (2003). Ripe fruit were harvested and weighed weekly from June 15th to December 19th. The early and spring fruit production were defined as the ranges from June 15th to September 30th and from October 1st to December 19th, respectively. The data were submitted to analysis of variance, and significance among means was tested by Tukey's test, at 5% probability.
Results and Discussion
Significant differences among treatments were found in crown diameter and in leaf and root dry mass of transplants at planting (Table 1). The largest crown and greater dry mass of leaves were obtained in plug transplants grown in 100-cm3 cells and in bare root transplants. The highest root dry mass was recorded in bare root transplants, and did not differ from plug transplants grown in 100 and 150-cm3 cells. After planting, survival of plug transplants from all cell sizes was 100%, while it was necessary to replant 18% of bare root transplants. Hochmuth et al. (2006b) suggested that a crown diameter of 8.0 mm could be one of the parameters taken into account for screening the physiological quality of strawberry transplants. Transplants from all treatments reached crown diameters higher than 8.0 mm and, in this sense, can be considered of high physiological quality (Table 1).
Early fruit yield did not differ among plug transplant treatments, with an average of 460.7 g per plant, and was higher than in bare root transplants (Table 2). Spring and total fruit yield did not differ among treatments treatments, with average yields of 435.2 and 873.8 g per plant, respectively. Similar results were reported in the United States of America from plug transplants grown in 75-150-cm3 cell trays and in Europe from containerized transplants in cells of about 300 cm3 (Baruzzi & Faedi, 1998; Lieten, 1998; Bish et al., 2002; Durner et al., 2002; Lieten et al., 2004; Hochmuth et al., 2006a).
Monthly distribution of early fruit yield was affected by treatments (Table 3). In June, lower yields were found in plants from bare root and V-50 plug transplants. In September, bare root and V-26.5 plug transplants did not differ. In July, August and September, similar yields were observed for all plug transplants. Higher early fruit yield of plants from plug transplants in comparison to plants from bare root transplants is in agreement with data from other authors (Durner, 1999; Bish et al., 2002; Hochmuth et al., 2006a, 2006b). The main explanation for such difference is related to planting stress. Absorbent roots of bare root transplants are mechanically damaged at digging and older leaves are pruned off before planting. New roots and leaves must be grown during plant establishment and carbon is allocated from the pool of assimilates to sustain their growth. As a consequence, plant growth is delayed and early fruit yield is reduced. The plugs are transplanted with the rooting system intact and protected from mechanical damage by the substrate remaining attached to the roots. As a consequence, their initial growth after planting is enhanced, leading to early flowering and fruit harvest (Duval et al., 2006; Hochmuth et al., 2006a).
Increasing the volume of the substrate in the production of strawberry plug transplants can lead to higher early and total fruit yield (Bish et al., 2002; Hochmuth et al., 2006b). No significant differences in fruit yield were observed among plug transplants from different cell sizes in the present experiment (Table 2). Higher early fruit yield was confirmed in plug transplants. For commercial production of plug transplants, smaller cell size of trays is advantageous because the amount of substrate is reduced and the surface use efficiency of the screenhouse is increased.
Earlier strawberry fruit yield is obtained with plug transplants, and the earliness can be achieved even in trays with cells as small as 26.5 or 50 cm3.
To Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico, and to Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio Grande do Sul.
ANDRIOLO, J.L. Preparo e manejo da solução nutritiva na produção de mudas e de frutas do morangueiro. In: SEMINÁRIO SOBRE O CULTIVO HIDRÔPONICO DE MORANGUEIRO, 1., 2007, Santa Maria. Anais. Santa Maria: UFSM, 2007. p.41-50. [ Links ]
BARUZZI, G.; FAEDI, W. La fragola in Italia. In: FAEDI, W. (Ed.). La fragola verso il 2000. Verona: Camera di Commercio, Industria, Artigianato e Agricoltura, 1998. p.95-110. [ Links ]
BISH, E.B.; CANTLIFFE, D.J.; CHANDLER, C.K. Temperature conditioning and container size affect early season fruit yield of strawberry plug plants in a winter, annual hill production system. HortScience, v.37, p.762-764, 2002. [ Links ]
DURNER, E.F. Winter greenhouse strawberry production using conditioned plug plants. HortScience, v.34, p.615-616, 1999. [ Links ]
DURNER, E.F.; POLING, E.B.; MAAS, J.L. Recent advances in strawberry plug transplant technology. HortTechnology, v.12, p.545-550, 2002. [ Links ]
DUVAL, J.R.; CHANDLER, C.K.; LEGARD, D.E. Effect of mechanical damage to strawberry transplants. Florida: University of Florida, 2006. Available at: <http://www.edis.ifas.ufl.edu/>. Accessed on: 20 Sept. 2007. (Document HS922). [ Links ]
FERNANDEZ, G.E.; BALLINGTON, J.R. Double cropping of strawberries in an annual system using conditioned plug plants and high tunnels. Acta Horticulturae, v.614, p.547-552, 2003. [ Links ]
HENNION, B.; VESCHAMBRE, D. La fraise: maîtrise de la production. Paris: CTIFL, 1997. 299p. [ Links ]
HOCHMUTH, G.; CANTLIFFE, D.; CHANDLER, C.; STANLEY, C.; BISH, E.; WALDO, E.; LEGARD, D.; DUVAL, J. Containerized strawberry transplants reduce establishment-period water use and enhance early growth and flowering compared with bare-root plants. HortTechnology, v.16, p.46-54, 2006a. [ Links ]
HOCHMUTH, G.; CANTLIFFE, D.; CHANDLER, C.; STANLEY, C.; BISH, E.; WALDO, E.; LEGARD, D.; DUVAL, J. Fruiting responses and economics of containerized and bare root strawberry transplants established with different irrigation methods. HortTechnology, v.16, p.205-210, 2006b. [ Links ]
LIETEN, F. La fragola in Belgio-Olanda. In: FAEDI, W. (Ed.). La Fragola verso il 2000. Verona: Camera di Commercio, Industria, Artigianato e Agricoltura, 1998. p.83-94. [ Links ]
LIETEN, P.; LONGUESSERRE, J.; BARUZZI, G.; LOPEZ-MEDINA, J.; NAVATEL, J.C.; KRUEGER, E.; MATALA, V.; PAROUSSI, G. Recent situation of strawberry substrate culture in Europe. Acta Horticulturae, v.649, p.193-196, 2004. [ Links ]
NESMITH, D.S.; DUVAL, J.R. The effect of container size. HortTechnology, v.8, p.495-498, 1998. [ Links ]
SANTOS, A.M. dos; MEDEIROS, A.R.M. de. Produção de mudas comerciais de morango. In: SANTOS, A.M. dos; MEDEIROS, A.R.M. de (Ed.). Morango: produção. Pelotas: Embrapa Clima Temperado, 2003. p.35-38. (Frutas do Brasil, 40). [ Links ]
TAKEDA, F.; HOKANSON S.C. Strawberry fruit and plug plant production in the greenhouse. Acta Horticulturae, v.626, p.283-285, 2003. [ Links ]
TAKEDA, F.; NEWELL, M. A method for increasing fall flowering in short-day Carmine strawberry. HortScience, v.41, p.480-481, 2006. [ Links ]
Received on March 3, 2009 and accepted on June 23, 2009