Acessibilidade / Reportar erro

Divergence and genetic variability among superior rubber tree genotypes

Divergência e variabilidade genética de genótipos superiores de seringueira

Abstracts

The objective of this work was to estimate the genetic variability and divergence among 22 superior rubber tree (Hevea sp.) genotypes of the IAC 400 series. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed using eight quantitative traits (descriptors), including yield. In the univariate analyses, the estimated parameters were: genetic and environmental variances; genetic and environmental coefficients of variation; and the variation index. The Mahalanobis generalized distance, the Tocher agglomerative method and canonical variables were used for the multivariate analyses. In the univariate analyses, variability was verified among the genotypes for all the variables evaluated. The Tocher method grouped the genotypes into 11 clusters of dissimilarity. The first four canonical variables explained 87.93% of the cumulative variation. The highest genetic variability was found in rubber yield-related traits, which contributed the most to the genetic divergence. The most divergent pairs of genotypes are suggested for crossbreeding. The genotypes evaluated are suitable for breeding and may be used to continue the IAC rubber tree breeding program.

Hevea brasiliensis; crossbreeding; multivariate analysis; selection


O objetivo deste trabalho foi estimar a divergência e a variabilidade genética entre 22 genótipos superiores de seringueira (Hevea sp.) da série IAC 400. Análises univariadas e multivariadas foram realizadas com oito caracteres quantitativos (descritores), incluindo produtividade. Na análise univariada, os parâmetros estimados foram: variâncias genética e ambiental, coeficientes de variação genética e ambiental, e índice de variação. A distância generalizada de Mahalanobis, o método aglomerativo de Tocher e variáveis canônicas foram utilizados nas análises multivariadas. Nas análises univariadas, verificou-se variabilidade entre os genótipos para todas as variáveis avaliadas. O método de Tocher agrupou os genótipos em 11 grupos de dissimilaridade. As quatro primeiras variáveis canônicas explicaram 87,93% da variação acumulada. A maior variabilidade genética foi encontrada em variáveis relacionadas à produtividade de borracha, que foram as que mais contribuíram para a divergência genética. Os pares de genótipos identificados como mais divergentes são indicados para cruzamentos. Os genótipos avaliados são adequados para o melhoramento genético e podem ser utilizados para continuar o programa de melhoramento da seringueira do IAC.

Hevea brasiliensis; cruzamentos; análise multivariada; seleção


GENETICS

Divergence and genetic variability among superior rubber tree genotypes

Divergência e variabilidade genética de genótipos superiores de seringueira

Lígia Regina Lima GouvêaI; Alisson Fernando ChioratoII; Paulo de Souza GonçalvesI

IInstituto Agronômico (IAC), Programa Seringueira, Caixa Postal 28, Cep 13001-970 Campinas, SP, Brazil. E-mail: lgouvea@iac.sp.gov.br, paulog@iac.sp.gov.br

IIIAC, Centro de Pesquisa e Desenvolvimento de Recursos Genéticos Vegetais. E-mail: afchiorato@iac.sp.gov.br

ABSTRACT

The objective of this work was to estimate the genetic variability and divergence among 22 superior rubber tree (Hevea sp.) genotypes of the IAC 400 series. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed using eight quantitative traits (descriptors), including yield. In the univariate analyses, the estimated parameters were: genetic and environmental variances; genetic and environmental coefficients of variation; and the variation index. The Mahalanobis generalized distance, the Tocher agglomerative method and canonical variables were used for the multivariate analyses. In the univariate analyses, variability was verified among the genotypes for all the variables evaluated. The Tocher method grouped the genotypes into 11 clusters of dissimilarity. The first four canonical variables explained 87.93% of the cumulative variation. The highest genetic variability was found in rubber yield-related traits, which contributed the most to the genetic divergence. The most divergent pairs of genotypes are suggested for crossbreeding. The genotypes evaluated are suitable for breeding and may be used to continue the IAC rubber tree breeding program.

Index terms:Hevea brasiliensis, crossbreeding, multivariate analysis, selection.

RESUMO

O objetivo deste trabalho foi estimar a divergência e a variabilidade genética entre 22 genótipos superiores de seringueira (Hevea sp.) da série IAC 400. Análises univariadas e multivariadas foram realizadas com oito caracteres quantitativos (descritores), incluindo produtividade. Na análise univariada, os parâmetros estimados foram: variâncias genética e ambiental, coeficientes de variação genética e ambiental, e índice de variação. A distância generalizada de Mahalanobis, o método aglomerativo de Tocher e variáveis canônicas foram utilizados nas análises multivariadas. Nas análises univariadas, verificou-se variabilidade entre os genótipos para todas as variáveis avaliadas. O método de Tocher agrupou os genótipos em 11 grupos de dissimilaridade. As quatro primeiras variáveis canônicas explicaram 87,93% da variação acumulada. A maior variabilidade genética foi encontrada em variáveis relacionadas à produtividade de borracha, que foram as que mais contribuíram para a divergência genética. Os pares de genótipos identificados como mais divergentes são indicados para cruzamentos. Os genótipos avaliados são adequados para o melhoramento genético e podem ser utilizados para continuar o programa de melhoramento da seringueira do IAC.

Termos para indexação:Hevea brasiliensis, cruzamentos, análise multivariada, seleção.

Introduction

Hevea brasiliensis (Willd. ex A. Juss.) Müll. Arg. is an important industrial tree crop, grown mainly in the tropics, between latitude 12º, on either side of the Equator. It is the main source of natural rubber, used in the manufacture of thousands of products of which the pneumatic tire is the most popular (Chandrasekhar et al. , 2007). According to data from the International Rubber Study Group -(International Rubber Study Group, 2009), 79% of the world's natural rubber comes from Thailand (30%), Indonesia (28%) and Malaysia (11%), while Brazil contributes with only around 1% of the production.

To improve the productivity of rubber tree plantations, Hevea breeding programs exploit genetically variable populations to obtain superior trees (Gonçalves et al., 2006a). In Brazil, the main goal of the genetic breeding program for rubber tree developed at Instituto Agronômico (IAC) is to increase rubber yield and vigor. In this program, Hevea genotypes, from Asia and Africa, and Brazilian genotypes have been used in crossbreeding. Considering the wide range of crossbreeding possibilities, the selection of parental genotypes is a major concern in order to guarantee the best combinations. The selection of divergent parents is an option to restrict the number of crossings that permit finding genetic recombinations for superior hybrids in the segregating progeny.

The use of established multivariate statistical algorithms is an important strategy for classifying germplasm, ordering variability for a large number of accessions, or analyzing genetic relationships among breeding materials. Multivariate analytical techniques, which simultaneously analyze multiple measurements for each individual studied, are widely used in analysis of genetic diversity, irrespective of the dataset (morphological, biochemical, or molecular markers) (Mohammadi & Prasanna, 2003). However, few rubber tree studies, such as those in Brazil by Paiva (1994), in Africa by Omokhafe & Alika (2003), and in Asia by Mydin et al. (1992), have used these analyses.

The objective of the present work was to estimate the genetic variability from a small population of advanced rubber tree genotypes through univariate analyses and their genetic divergence using multivariate analysis, to indicate promising crosses.

Materials and Methods

Twenty-three rubber tree genotypes (clones) were evaluated for eight agronomic traits, in Jaú, São Paulo state, Brazil (22º17' S, 48º34' W and 580 m altitude). Of the 23 genotypes, 22 belong to the IAC 400 series developed and selected at Instituto Agronômico (IAC), Campinas, SP, Brazil. One genotype (RRIM 600), obtained from the Research Institute of Malaysia (RRIM), was used as control, as shown in Table 1. The clones were budded on established GT1 clonal rootstocks in the nursery. One-and-a-half-year-old rootstock seedlings raised in nurseries were used to budgraft the clonal materials. The successful budgrafts were uprooted and planted in plastics bags. The experiment was planted in the field after the first flush of leaves. A randomized block design was used with three replicates and ten trees per plot, distributed in 8.0x2.5m spacing.

The traits related to vigor consisted of the mean girth annual increment before tapping, considering seven-year averages (GIB) and, after tapping, considering three-year averages (GIA), and girth growth increment in the third year of tapping (GGT). The annual increment was calculated by subtracting the girths between consecutive years. In the first year, the girth was measured at 0.50 m above the budding callus using a caliper. Measurements were converted into annual girth growth values assuming that the trunk was cylindrical. After the first year, a tape was used to measure the girths at 1.20 m above the budding callus.

The studied variables related to rubber yield consisted of the general mean of dry rubber yield in the three years of yielding (RYF), mean of dry rubber yield in the third year of yielding (RYT) and mean tapping yield index (YI). Yield data collection started when the rubber trees were seven years old, with girths greater than 45 cm.

Yield data was recorded on normal tapping days. The latex was collected in individual plastic cups for each tree and coagulated by adding 2% (v/v) acetic acid solution, with stirring, to the cup once the latex flow had stopped. The coagulated rubber in each cup was made into a "biscuit", which was dried for about 30 days by hanging on a wire tied to the tree from which it had been extracted. After drying, each rubber biscuit was weighed, and the data for each tree recorded. Then, the total annual weight yielded per tree was divided by the number of biscuits, and the data was expressed in grams of dry rubber per tapping per tree. For the trial, the tapping system ½S d/4 5d/7 11 m/y ET 2.5% Pa10/y: tapping in half spiral (½S), at 4-day tapping intervals (d/4), 5 days a week (5d/7), for 11 months a year (11 m/y), stimulated by 2.5% ethefon, applied with a paint brush on the tapping panel (Pa), 10 times a year (10/y) was used.

The mean yield index (YI) was obtained as follows: YI = (dry rubber yield in the third year)/(girth growth value in the third year of yielding).

The studied variables associated to the latex system consisted of bark thickness (BT) and number of latex vessel rings contained in the bark (NLV). In the seventh year, simultaneously with the opening of the tapping panel, samples of virgin bark were taken 1 m above the budding callus using an extractor. Bark samples were preserved in 70% ethanol and stored at 5ºC. Measurements were taken with a caliper, and means were expressed in millimeters. Paraffin-embedded bark samples were sliced with a microtome. Bark sections (125 µm) were dehydrated in 90% ethanol and stained with Sudan III. Latex vessel rings were counted in longitudinal-radial histological samples using a light microscope at 10x magnification.

Univariate analysis was carried out on the data, and the means were compared by the Scott and Knott (1974) test. The multivariate analysis was based on eight agronomic traits.

The plot means of each character were used for the analysis of variance. The genotype means and effects were fixed, while the remaining data were considered random. In the analysis of variance, the estimated variation components were the genotypic () and environmental variances. The coefficients of genetic (Vg% = 100. /) and environmental (Vg%) variation were estimated, from which is the overall mean of each character (descriptor).

The variation index (θ) as θ = Vg / Ve (Vencovsky, 1987) was used to estimate the genetic variability of the traits evaluated for the 23 genotypes. The variation index represents the ratio between the coefficient of genetic variation and the coefficient of environmental variation.

Genetic divergence among the genotypes was estimated by multivariate statistical analyses. Initially, the dissimilarity among genotypes was estimated using the Mahalanobis generalized distance, described by Cruz & Carneiro (2003) as: = δ' ψ-1 δ, in which: is the Mahalanobis generalized distance among genotypes i and i'; ψ is the variance matrix and residual covariances; δ' = [d1 d2 ... dv], in which dj = Yij -Yi'j; Yij is the mean of the ith genotype in relation to the jth variable.

The Tocher optimization method was used for genotype clustering analysis. In the analysis of canonical variables, the divergence was visualized by graphic dispersion of the first variables. The relative contribution of each descriptor to genetic diversity was quantified using Singh's (1981) criterion. By this criterion, traits showing lower variability or represented by others are considered of minor importance.

The Genes software (Cruz, 2006) was used for all statistical analyses.

Results and Discussion

The genotype effects were significant (p<0.01) for GIB, RYT, RYF, GGT, YI and BT traits, and for GIAand BT (p<0.05). This variability is an essential condition for a breeding program, indicating the possibility of selection between genotypes.

The estimates of genetic variance (), environmental variance (), coefficients of genetic variation (CVg%), coefficients of experimental variation (CVe%) and the variation indexes (θ) are shown in Table 2. Knowledge of variation and heritability of the characters of interest is the basis upon which a well-designed Hevea breeding program should be based (Gonçalves et al., 2009). The coefficients of genetic variation (CVg%) of the traits associated with yield (RYT, RYF and YI) were higher than those related to vigor (GIB, GIA and GGT). These results agreed with previous studies of rubber tree clones (Gonçalves et al., 2007) and progenies (Costa et al., 2000a, 2000b; Gonçalves et al., 2004) and indicated that the rubber production improvement program can be continued. The environmental variation coefficients varied from 6.58% (GGT) to 17.70% (RYT). Considering the criterion of Pimentel-Gomes (1987), the coefficients of environmental variation were low for GGT, BT, GIB and BT, indicating good experimental precision. For GIA, RYT, RYF and YI, the coefficients of environmental variation were average. The variation index θ, a parameter that helps to detect the genetic variability of the population, was estimated for the eight variables studied. Values were higher than 1 for GIB, RYT, RYF, GGT, YI and BT. According to Vencosvsky (1987) in a study on a selection of corn progenies, when θ is equal to or higher than 1, conditions are highly favorable for selection.

The highest girth growth increments, considering seven-year averages, were observed before tapping in the IAC 402 (7.07 cm), IAC 412 (6.75 cm) and IAC 413 (6.66 cm) genotypes, which were all significantly higher than the experimental control (Table 3). For girth growth increments after tapping, considering three-year averages, the highest values were found in the IAC 409 (5.43 cm), IAC 412 (5.42 cm) and IAC 402 (5.36 cm) genotypes, none of which was significantly higher than the control. The average girth growth increment before tapping was higher than after tapping, for all genotypes except IAC 409. In general, girth growth is lower after than before tapping.In the after-tapping phase, the source-drain relationship is altered with the carbohydrate reserves used for latex regeneration, and girth growth is reduced (Castro, 2000).

The IAC 400 genotype showed the highest dry rubber yield in the third year of yielding (RYT) and also the highest general mean of dry rubber yield, during the three years of yielding (RYF), differing significantly from all other genotypes. Gonçalves et al. (2007) reported high performance of this genotype in annual assessments of dry rubber yield. IAC 400 performed better than the control (RRIM 600) for GIB, GGT and YI. The virgin bark thickness (BT) varied between 6.48 cm and 4.60 cm in the opening of the tapping panel. The highest and lowest values were observed in IAC 423 and IAC 409, respectively. These values were similar to those observed by Gonçalves et al. (2006 a). However, bark thickness was not significantly higher than the control, for any of the genotypes. Over one third of the genotypes had a higher average number of latex vessel rings than the control.

In the multivariate analysis, through , the highest divergence was observed between IAC 409 and IAC 423 ( = 61.45). It must be emphasized that IAC 409 has the Hevea benthamiana clone F 4542 in its ascendance, which may have increased its genetic diversity (Rieserberg, 1997). The lowest divergence was observed between IAC 416 and RRIM 600 (= 2.57). This small value was due to the fact that RRIM 600 is the female parent of IAC 416 (Table 1).

When comparing the performance of the genotypes (Table 3), IAC 409 and IAC 423 - the most divergent pair (Table 4) - showed equal or better performance than the experimental control for almost all traits, except for BT (IAC 409) and GIA and RYT (IAC 423). Nevertheless, in the least divergent pair formed by IAC 416 and the control RRIM 600, IAC 416 did not show better performance than the control for any of the traits studied and, therefore, it is not an interesting alternative for breeding. IAC 400 was prominent in divergence and had better performance than the control for GIB, GGT, RYT, RYF and YI, allying divergence to good performance, especially regarding traits related to dry rubber yield. In crossbreeding, performance should be taken into consideration in addition to genetic divergence (Paiva, 1994; Cruz & Carneiro, 2003; Elias et al., 2007).

The fifteen most divergent pairs of genotypes, identified through , are suggested for crossbreeding (Table 4). Genotypes of the IAC 400 series have already gone through a selection cycle (Gonçalves et al., 2007) and, therefore, contain traits of interest. With breeding between superior genotypes, a combination of favorable alleles in the genes that contribute to the traits of interest is expected. The rubber tree is allogamous; thus superior and divergent parents enable greater variability in segregating progenies. Consequently, there is a greater chance for obtaining progenies that are superior to the parents with genotypes that can be fixed by asexual propagation.

The Tocher method, applied to the dissimilarity matrix obtained from the Mahalanobis generalized distance, distinguished 11 groups (Table 5), which indicated that although these genotypes are a result of selection in a breeding program, they still maintain high genetic diversity.

The descriptors that showed the highest contribution (S.j%) to genetic divergence were RYT (24.45%), RYF (23.57%) and GIB (17.36%). It can be inferred that, for these traits, the contribution is genetically related, since it was verified that θ>1 (Table 2). According to the present study, the yield-related traits (RYT, RYF) showed high contribution for divergence and high genetic variability. Increased rubber yield is the primary objective of rubber tree breeding and, in previous studies, it has shown high genetic variability (Costa et al., 2002; Gonçalves et al., 2006b). However, the descriptors that presented a lower contribution to genetic divergence, YI (1.97%), NLV (2.84%) and GGT (6.37%) can be considered of little importance, since they can be represented by other descriptors. According to Singh's criteria (1981), characters with low variability that are represented by others are of little contribution. High phenotypic correlations were found between YI and RYF (r = 0.8907**), YI and RYT (r = 0.7758**), NLV and BT (r = 0.7336**), and GIB and GGT (r = 0.9418**). The coefficients of genetic correlation were 0.8969, 0.7812, 0.8463 and 0.9727, respectively. Concerning variability, Gonçalves et al. (2004) reported the lack of a significant genotypic or phenotypic correlation between growth vigor and the total number of latex vessel rings, which indicates that there would be a low genetic gain for these traits, even if selection were undertaken for only one trait.

The first two canonical variables accumulated 56.77% of the total variation, with 75.16% for the first three and 87.93% for the first four. According to Cruz & Carneiro (2003), when the first canonical variables explain around 80% of the total variation, the analysis of the genetic diversity through graphic dispersion is satisfactory. Figure 1 shows the tridimensional graphic representation, in which 75.16% of the variation is accumulated. The distance among the 15 pairs of the most divergent genotypes, listed in Table 3, can be visualized, especially the distance of IAC 400 (1), which is among the most divergent genotypes. Therefore, there was consistency between the graphic visualization and the identification of the divergent genotypes.


Conclusions

1. The highest genetic variability is observed in rubber yield-related traits, which also contribute the most to genetic divergence.

2. The small population of rubber tree clones shows potential for selection and may be used to continue a rubber tree breeding program with emphasis on yield.

3. Of this population, only IAC 400 allied genetic divergence to high yield performance and vigor in the pre-tapping period.

4. The most divergent rubber tree genotypes identified in this study are the most indicated for crossbreeding.

Acknowledgements

To Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (Fapesp) and to Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq), for financial support.

Received on December 12, 2009 and accepted on January 5, 2010

  • CASTRO, P.R.C. Bases fisiológicas da produção do látex e da estimulação de Hevea brasiliensis Muell. Arg. In: BERNARDES M. S. (Ed). Sangria da seringueira Piracicaba: Esalq, 2000. p.45-63.
  • CHANDRASEKHAR, T.R.; MARATTUKALAM J.G.; MERCYKUTTY, V.C.; PRIYADARSHAN, P.M. Age of yield stabilization and its implications for optimizing selection and shortening breeding cycle in rubber (Hevea brasiliensis). Euphytica, v.156, p.67-75, 2007.
  • COSTA, R. B.; RESENDE, M.D.V.; ARAUJO, A.J.; GONÇALVES, P.S.; BORTOLETTO, N. Seleção combinada univariada e multivariada aplicada ao melhoramento genético da seringueira. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira, v.35, p.381-388, 2000a.
  • COSTA, R. B.; RESENDE, M.D.V.; ARAUJO, A.J.; GONÇALVES, P.S.; SILVA, M. A. Maximization of genetic gain in rubber tree (Hevea) breeding with effective size restriction. Genetic and Molecular Biology, v.23, p.457-462, 2000b.
  • COSTA, R. B.; RESENDE, M.D.V.; GONÇALVES, P.S.; SILVA, M. A. Individual multivariate REML/BLUP in the presence of genotype x environment interaction in rubber tree (Hevea) breedings. Crop Breeding Applied Biotechnology, v.2, p.131-140, 2002.
  • CRUZ, C.D. (Ed.). Programa GENES: multivariate analysis and simulation. Viçosa: UFV, 2006. 175p.
  • CRUZ, C.D.; CARNEIRO, P.C.S. (Ed.). Modelos biométricos aplicados ao melhoramento genético Viçosa: UFV. 2003. 585p.
  • ELIAS, H.T.; VIDIGAL, M.C.G.; GONELA, A.; VOGT, G. A. Variabilidade genética em germoplasma tradicional de feijão-preto em Santa Catarina. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira, v.42, p.1443-1449, 2007.
  • GONÇALVES, P.S.; AGUIAR, A.T.E.; COSTA, R. B.; GONÇALVES, E.C.P.; SCALOPPI-JUNIOR E.J.; BRANCO, R. B.F. Genetic variation and realized genetic gain from rubber tree improvement. Scientia Agricola, v.66, p.44-51, 2009.
  • GONÇALVES, P.S.; AGUIAR, A.T.E.; GOUVÊA, L.R.L. Expressão fenótípica de clones de seringueira na região noroeste do Estado de São Paulo. Bragantia, v.65, p.389-398, 2006b.
  • GONÇALVES, P.S.; MARTINS, A.L.M.; BORTOLETTO, N.; SAES, L. A. Selection and genetic gains for juvenile traits in progenies of Hevea in São Paulo state, Brazil. Genetics and Molecular Biology, v.27, p.207-214, 2004.
  • GONÇALVES, P.S.; SILVA, M. A.; AGUIAR, A.T.E.; MARTINS, M. A.; SCALOPPI-JUNIOR, E.J.; GOUVÊA, L.R.L. Performance of new Hevea clones from IAC 400 series. Scientia Agricola v.64, p.241-248, 2007.
  • GONÇALVES, P.S.; SILVA, M. A.; GOUVÊA, L.R.L.; SCALOPPI-JUNIOR, E.J. Genetic variability for girth growth and rubber yield in Hevea brasiliensis Scientia Agricola, v.63, p.246-254, 2006a.
  • INTERNATIONAL RUBBER STUDY GROUP. Rubber statistical bulletin Wembley: IRSG, 2009. v.63. 61p. Available at: <http://www.rubberstudy.com>. Accessed on: 25 June 2009.
  • MOHAMMADI, S. A.; PRASANNA, B.M. Analyses of genetic diversity in crop plants - salient statistics tools and considerations. Crop Science, v.43, p.1235-1248, 2003.
  • MYDIN, K.K.; GOPINATHAN, N; SETHURAJ, M.R.; SARASWATHY, P.; PANIKKAR O.N. Genetic divergence in Hevea brasiliensis Indian Journal of Natural Rubber Research, v.5, p.120-126, 1992.
  • OMOKHAFE, K.O.; ALIKA, J.E. Phenetic relationship of rubber tree clones. Biologia Plantarum, v.46, p.217-222, 2003.
  • PAIVA, J.R. Divergência genética entre clones primários de seringueira. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira, v.29, p.607-615, 1994.
  • PIMENTEL-GOMES, F. (Ed.). Curso de estatística experimental São Paulo: Nobel, 1990. 465p.
  • RIESEBERG, L.H. Hybrid origins of plant species. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, v.28, p.359-389, 1997.
  • SINGH, D. A. The relative importance of characters affecting genetic divergence. Indian Journal of Genetics and Plant Breeding, v.41, p.237-245, 1981.
  • SCOTT, A.J.; KNOTT, M. A. A. A cluster analysis method for grouping means in the analysis of variance. Biometrics, v. 30, p.507-512, 1974.
  • VENCOVSKY, R. Herança quantitativa. In: PATERNIANI, E.; VIEGAS, G.P. (Ed.). Melhoramento e produção de milho Campinas: Fundação Cargill, 1987. p.137-214.

Publication Dates

  • Publication in this collection
    22 Sept 2010
  • Date of issue
    Feb 2010

History

  • Accepted
    05 Jan 2010
  • Received
    12 Dec 2009
Embrapa Secretaria de Pesquisa e Desenvolvimento; Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira Caixa Postal 040315, 70770-901 Brasília DF Brazil, Tel. +55 61 3448-1813, Fax +55 61 3340-5483 - Brasília - DF - Brazil
E-mail: pab@embrapa.br