SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.35 número2Controle de Meloidogyne javanica em mudas de bananeira 'prata-anã' por compostos orgânicosOcorrência de Ceratocystis fimbriata em Kiwi (Actinidia deliciosa) no sul do Brasil índice de autoresíndice de assuntospesquisa de artigos
Home Pagelista alfabética de periódicos  

Serviços Personalizados

Journal

Artigo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

Compartilhar


Revista Brasileira de Fruticultura

versão impressa ISSN 0100-2945

Rev. Bras. Frutic. vol.35 no.2 Jaboticabal jun. 2013

http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0100-29452013000200039 

COMUNICAÇÃO CIENTÍFICA SCIENTIFIC
DEFESA FITOSSANITÁRIA
PLANT PROTECTION

 

Histopathology of Colletotrichum gloeosporioides on guava fruits (Psidium guajava L.)1

 

Histopatologia de Colletotrichum gloeosporioides em frutos de goiabeira (Psidium guajava L.)

 

 

Sylvia Raquel Gomes MoraesI; Francisco André Osama TanakaII; Nelson Sidnei Massola JúniorIII

IEng. Agr., Dra., Departamento de Fitopatologia e Nematologia, Escola de Agricultura "Luiz de Queiroz", Universidade de São Paulo, Avenida Pádua Dias, 11, CEP 13418-900, Piracicaba, SP, Brazil. E-mail: sylmoraes@yahoo.com.br
IIEng. Agr., Prof. Dr., Departamento de Fitopatologia e Nematologia, Escola de Agricultura "Luiz de Queiroz", Universidade de São Paulo. E-mail: fatanaka@esalq.usp.br
IIIEng. Agr., Prof. Dr., Departamento de Fitopatologia e Nematologia, Escola de Agricultura "Luiz de Queiroz", Universidade de São Paulo. E-mail: nmassola@esalq.usp.br

 

 


ABSTRACT

Anthracnose, caused by Colletotrichum gloeosporioides, produces brown lesions on guava fruits, causing severe losses on postharvest. In this study, the infection and colonization of guava fruits by C. gloeosporioides has been examined using scanning and transmission electron microscopy. Fruits at the physiologically mature stage were inoculated with a 105 conidia/mL spore suspension. Afterward, fruits were incubated at 25 °C in a wet chamber for periods of 6, 12, 24, 48, 96 and 120 h to allow examination of the infection and colonization process. Conidia germination and appressoria formation occurred six hours after inoculation (h.a.i). Penetration occurred directly via penetration pegs from appressoria, which penetrated the host cuticle 48 h.a.i. Notably, the appressoria did not produce an appressorial cone surrounding the penetration pore. Infection vesicles were found in epidermal cells 96 h.a.i. The same fungal structures were found in epidermal and parenchymal cells of the host 120 h.a.i. Colonization strategy of C. gloeosporioides on guava fruit was intracellular hemibiotrophic.

Index terms: colonization, penetration, pre-penetration, ultrastructure.


RESUMO

A antracnose, causada por Colletotrichum gloeosporioides, é caracterizada por lesões marrons nos frutos de goiabeira, causando severas perdas em pós-colheita. Os processos de infecção e colonização de C. gloeosporioides foram estudados usando microscópio eletrônico de varredura e transmissão. Frutos em plena maturação fisiológica foram inoculados com suspensão de 105 conídios/mL. Posteriormente, os frutos foram incubados em câmara úmida a 25 °C, por períodos de molhamento de 6; 12; 24; 48; 96 e 120 h para o estudo do processo de infecção e colonização. Germinação de conídios e formação de apressórios ocorreram seis horas após a inoculação (h.a.i). A penetração ocorreu diretamente, por meio da formação do peg de penetração emitido da base do apressório, o qual penetrou na cutícula 48 h.a.i. O apressório não produziu o cone apressorial ao redor do poro de penetração. Foram observadas vesículas de infecção nas células epidérmicas 96 h.a.i. As mesmas estruturas fúngicas foram encontradas nas células epidérmicas e parenquimáticas do hospedeiro, após 120 h da inoculação. A estratégia de colonização de C. gloeosporioides foi do tipo hemibiotrófica intracelular.

Termos Para indexação: Colonização, penetração, pré-penetração, ultraestrutura.


 

 

Colletotrichum species cause anthracnose diseases on several plants including cereals, vegetables, garden plants and perennial crops. These pathogens cause severe problems at different stages of crop growth and different parts of the plant like roots, stems, leaves, flowers and fruits (BAILEY; JEGER, 1992; JEFFRIES et al., 1990; PRUSKY; FREEMAN; DICKMAN, 2000). Although anthracnose symptoms may appear in the field, depending on the host and environmental conditions, Colletotrichum also cause quiescent infections in fruit, placing them amongst the most important postharvest pathogen. Thereby the pathogen infects the fruit still in the field, but symptoms appear only during ripening (JEFFRIES et al. 1990).

Anthracnose is one of the main guava diseases in all guava-growing countries, causing considerable postharvest losses (LIM; MANICOM, 2003). It is characterized by depressed, soaked, necrotic lesions, with an irregular shape and brown color on the fruit surface. In conditions of high humidity, a salmon-colored conidial mass develops in the center of the lesions. The lesions are also observed in leaves, petioles and branches which do not cause severe damage to the plant but acts as sources of inoculum between seasons (BAILEY; JEGER, 1992; PEREIRA; MARTINEZ Jr., 1986; PICCININ et al., 2005).

Colletotrichum species penetrate the host plant through wounds, natural openings or directly via appressorium (JEFFRIES et al., 1990). A large number of Colletotrichum species penetrate directly and the formation of the appressorium is a pre-requisite for the invasion of the host tissues. In contrast, there are species in which the appressorium is optional or unnecessary (EMMETT; PARBERY, 1975).

After penetrating host plant, the pathogen may employ two distinct strategies for colonization: intracellular hemibiotrophy or subcuticular intramural colonization or even a combination of both strategies (BAILEY et al., 1992). Colletotrichum trifolii and C. lindemuthianum adopt the intracellular hemibiotrophy strategy. After penetration, they form a spherical infection vesicle. Hyphae grow from this vesicle and subsequently colonize other host cells (O'CONNELL et al., 1985; MOULD et al., 1991b). In this model, the fungus initially grows biotrophically, without inducing symptoms, but later, in the necrotrophic phase, the fungus induces decay of the host cells causing symptoms (LATUNDE-DADA et al., 1996; O'CONNELL et al., 2000).

Colletotrichum acutatum and C. fragariae in strawberry (CURRY et al., 2002) adopt subcuticular intramural colonization. After penetration, the pathogen grows beneath the cuticle and inside the periclinal and anticlinal wall of the epidermal cells, causing dissolution of the cell wall.

Studies have shown that colonization strategy adopted by C. acutatum depends on the host (CURRY et al., 2002; DIÉGUEZ-URIBEONDO et al., 2005; WHARTON; SCHILDER, 2008), type of vegetal tissue infected (DIÉGUEZ-URIBEONDO et al., 2005; PERES et al., 2005) or host cultivar (WHARTON; SCHILDER, 2008).

The objectives of this study were to characterize the pre-penetration and penetration events of Colletotrichum gloeosporioides on guava fruits, as well as to identify the colonization strategy adopted by this species.

Physiologically mature 'Kumagai' guava fruits (Psidium guajava L.) were obtained from Campinas, a guava producer municipality in the State of São Paulo, Brazil. The fruits were disinfested with 0.5% NaOCl for 10 min, rinsed in sterile distilled water, dried at room temperature and conditioned into plastic boxes previously disinfested with 70% ethanol. Inoculation procedures were subsequently carried out on the fruit surfaces.

A pathogenic strain of C. gloeosporioides, obtained from symptomatic guava fruit from commercial field, was cultivated in PDA (Potato-Dextrose-Agar). Later, it was identified via PCR with a specific primer (CgInt) in accordance with methodology described by Mills et al. (1992).

Since the Colletotrichum strain used in the study did not sporulate in any tested culture medium, spores were produced on mycelium-inoculated guava fruits as an alternative. Five millimeters diameter agar plugs were removed from the edges of the colonies grown on PDA and placed on ripe, healthy guava fruit surfaces. Fruits were previously disinfested as described above and arranged inside plastic boxes on top of three sheets of filter paper saturated with water. After eight days, the conidia were collected directly from the diseased fruits by washing the anthracnose lesions with sterile distilled water. This procedure also assured the maintenance of the fungus pathogenicity (WILSON et al., 1990). Suspensions of 105 conidia/mL (as measured with a hemacytometer) were prepared with sterile distilled water and used in all inoculation procedures.

Inoculation was performed by depositing 40 µL of conidial suspension on the surface of fruits. The suspension was deposited in 0.5 cm circles that were previously marked with adhesive plastic tape. Next, the fruits were conditioned in plastic boxes containing three sheets of filter paper saturated with water and incubated in a humidified atmosphere at 25°C for continuous periods of 6, 12, 24 48, 96 and 120 h. These samples were then used to study the infection and colonization process using scanning (SEM) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM).

Samples of inoculated tissue were removed with a scalpel and transferred to 1.5 mL microtubes containing a modified Karnovsky's fixative (2.5% glutaraldehyde and 2.5% of formaldehyde solution in sodium-cacodilate buffer 0.05M - pH 7.2 and CaCl2 0.001M). These samples were stored at 4°C for at least 48 h and processed for SEM and TEM according to the methods of Bozzola and Russell (1998).

A portion of the samples that had been inoculated and incubated at 25°C for 24 h were transferred to glass vials and submitted to ultrasonic treatment in a Branson 2210R-DTH (Bransonic, USA) apparatus for 15 minutes after fixation. Subsequently, the samples were processed for visualization by SEM.

For SEM analysis, the samples were removed from the modified Karnovsky's fixative, rinsed in 0.05 M sodium cacodilate buffer pH 7.2 and postfixed in 1% osmium tetroxide three times every 10 minutes for two hours. Afterward, they were rinsed in distilled water three times of 10 minutes and dehydrated in serial dilutions of pure acetone (30, 50, 70, 90 and 100%), for 10 minutes at each concentration. The procedure was done in triplicate with pure acetone. Samples were then dried to the critical point by immersing fragments in liquid carbon dioxide in a CPD 030 critical point dryer (Balzers, Lichtenstein), then fixed in aluminum stubs with double-sided carbon tape. After this step, metallization was carried out using gold vapor in a Balzers MED 010 equipment (Balzers Union, Lichtenstein), at 50 mA, for 180 seconds. Observations were made using a Zeiss DSM 940A Scanning Electron Microscope (Carl Zeiss, Germany). Five fruits were analyzed per treatment and the experiment was repeated twice.

For TEM analysis, the samples were processed as described for SEM procedures up to the fixation in osmium tetroxide 1% for two hours. Afterward, these samples were sliced into pieces of approximately 0.1 x 0.3 cm and "en bloc" contrasted with 0.5% uranyl acetate overnight. Subsequently, they were dehydrated in serial dilutions of pure acetone (30, 50, 70, 90 and 100%) for 10 min at each concentration. The last procedure was performed in triplicate. The samples were embedded in Spurr's low viscosity epoxy resin. After polymerization for 72 h at 70 °C, the blocks were trimmed in a Leica EM TRIM apparatus (Leica, Austria) and cut in a Leica Ultracut UCT microtome (Leica, Austria).

Ultra-fine sections (60-70 nm) were obtained with a Diatome 45o diamond knife (Diatome, Switzerland) and collected in Formvar coated 100 mesh copper grids. After staining with uranyl acetate (3%) and lead citrate for 15 minutes, each grid was examined in a Zeiss EM 900 Transmission Electron Microscope (Carl Zeiss, Germany). The experiment was performed once, with five replicates per treatment.

It was observed germinated conidia, germ tubes and appressoria adhered to the surface of the inoculated fruits. However, after the ultrasound treatment, only the appressoria remained fixed to the host surface (Figure 1A). The significance of these results lies in the fact that the adhesion of the appressorium plays an important role in the success of the infection. Adhesion of the appressorium ensures that the pathogen remains in contact with the host long enough to originate the penetration peg and subsequently the penetration (BAILEY; JEGER, 1992).

Conidial germination of Colletotrichum is highly variable, starting between three and 48 hours after inoculation (h.a.i) (BAILEY; JEGER, 1992; LOPEZ, 2001). In this study, conidial germination was observed 6 h.a.i, through the formation of the germ tube or appressoria, similar to the findings obtained with C. dematium in cowpea and C. fragariae in cherimoya fruits (SMITH; KORSTEN; AVELING, 1999; VILLANUEVA-ARCE et al., 2006). In coffee plants inoculated with C. gloeosporioides and C. dematium, the conidial germination started 5 and 12 h.a.i, respectively (LINS; ABREU; ALVES, 2007). Conidia of Colletotrichum acutatum germinated 4 h.a.i on strawberries (ARROYO et al., 2005) and C. destructivum took 12 h to germinate on tobacco (SHEN; GOODWIN; HSING, 2001).

Colletotrichum gloeosporioides conidia are normally aseptate, however they develop septa during germination (Figure 1B-C) due to mitosis (MOULD et al., 1991a; O'CONNELL et al., 1993).

The germ tube growth was not affected by the presence or location of stomata on the fruit surface (Figure 1D). There was no penetration via the stomata. Penetration occurred directly via penetration pegs from the appressoria. On the other hand C. gloeosporioides did not penetrate directly into the cuticle of mulberry leaf. It penetrates through stomata cavity where an infection vesicle was formed (KUMAR et al., 2001).

The appressoria developed in different positions on the conidia and presented distinct shapes, including spherical, irregular, lobed or clavate (Figure 1E-H). Thus, in this case appressoria morphology should not be used for species identification.

Ultrastructural analysis showed that the appressoria were surrounded by an extracellular matrix, which appeared to be responsible for the adhesion to the host surface. The area of contact between the appressoria and the fruit surface was relatively narrow (Figure 1 I-K). After the formation of the penetration peg, the cuticle structure remained intact in the region near the pore, supporting the hypothesis that penetration occurs mainly through mechanical force, as reported for C. acutatum in strawberry (ARROYO et al., 2005). However, other factors, such as enzyme activation during the process need to be considered (O'CONNELL et al., 1985; KÖLLER, 1991). Cutinase enzyme is present in conidial mucilage and in extracellular fluids of germinated conidia of Colletotrichum kahawae in coffee leaves and berries. However, the turgor pressure plays a major role in the coffee cuticle penetration (CHEN et al., 2004).

The appressorial wall is composed of three distinct layers. The third layer was deposited on the appressorium base between the plasmalemma and the inner wall layer (Figure 1 I-K), forming a penetration pore. This layer was adjacent to the wall of the penetration peg, which emerges through the pore and penetrates directly through the cuticle into the epidermal cell wall. Inside the appressorium of some Colletotrichum species, such as C. trifolli (MOULD et al., 1991a), the infection pore is surrounded by a cone-shaped structure called the appressorial cone. This structure is an extension of the penetration peg wall and may act on the hydrostatic pressure at the penetration spot. However, in this study the appressorial cone was not observed, which is also the case of C. sublineolum (WHARTON et al., 2001), C truncatum (O'CONNELL et al., 1993) and C. acutatum (ARROYO et al., 2005). The lack of a cone in some species and its presence in others suggests that mechanism of infection by species of Colletotrichum depends on the host species.

According to the definition of some authors (BAILEY et al., 1992; PERFECT et al., 1999), the colonization process of C. gloeosporioides in guava was intracellular hemibiotrophic, similar to the observed in other species of Colletotrichum, such as C. trifolli and C. lindemuthianum in alfalfa and bean leaves, respectively (O'CONNELL et al., 1985; MOULD et al., 1991a, 1991b). In this study, it was observed at 48 h.a.i that the penetration pegs originated in the base of the appressorium and penetrated directly into the cuticle (Figure 2A). Successful penetration was followed by the formation of structures that are specialized for colonization 96 h.a.i, such as the spherical vesicles inside the cells. The hyphae and vesicles were restricted to the initially infected epidermal cells (Figure 2B). At 120 h.a.i, vesicles and hyphae were found in the epidermal (Figure 2C), and in the parenchymal cells (Figure 2D). Figure 3 summarizes the chronology of events involved in infection and colonization of guava fruit by Colletotrichum gloeosporioides.

On the other hand, different colonization strategies were observed by C. acutatum and C. fragariae in strawberry (CURRY et al., 2002), C. capsici in cowpea (PRING et al., 1995) and C. gloeosporioides in papaya (CHAU; ALVAREZ, 1983) because these species did not invade the host cells to form a biotrophic relationship with the protoplast. Instead, the infection hyphae grow underneath the cuticle and inside the periclinal and anticlinal wall of the epidermal cells. DIÉGUEZ-URIBEONDO et al. (2005) also reported two different colonization strategies in almonds, such as intracellular hemibiotrophic and subcuticular intramural necrotrophic.

The present study highlights that the infection process and the colonization are independent and specific mechanisms, which vary according to the host - pathogen interaction, corroborating the observations of Emmett and Parbery (1975). Thus, knowledge of specialized infection structures, e.g., germ tubes, appressoria, penetration pegs, infection vesicles, primary hyphae, and secondary hyphae of Colletotrichum provides excellent models for studying the cell biology of other plant pathogenic fungi (O'CONNELL et al., 2000).

 

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

The authors appreciate the technical support provided by Dr. Elliot Watanabe Kitajima and the Laboratory NAP/MEPA-ESALQ/USP, Piracicaba, Brazil.

 

REFERENCES

ARROYO, F.T.; MORENO, J.; GARCIA-HERDUGO, G.; DE LOS SANTOS, B.; BARRAU, C.; PORRAS, M.; BLANCO, C.; ROMERO F. Ultrastructure of the early stages of Colletotrichum acutatum infection of strawberry tissues. Canadian Journal of Botany-Revue Canadienne De Botanique, Ottawa, v.83, p.491-500, 2005.         [ Links ]

BAILEY, J.A.; JEGER, M.J. Colletotrichum: biology, pathology and control. England: CAB Internacional Wallingford, 1992. 388p.         [ Links ]

BAILEY, J.A.; O'CONNELL, R.J.; PRING, R.J.; NASH, C. Infection strategies of Colletotrichum species. In: BAILEY, J.A.; JEGER, M.J. (Ed.). Colletotrichum: biology, pathology and control. England: CAB Internacional Wallingford, 1992. cap. 5, p. 1-26.         [ Links ]

BOZZOLA, J.J.; RUSSEL, L.D. Electron microscopy: principles and techniques for biologists. Sudbury: Jones and Barlett Publishers, 1998.         [ Links ]

CHAU, K.F.; ALVAREZ, A.M. A histological study of anthracnose on Carica papaya. Phytopathology, St Paul, v.73, p.1113-1116, 1983.         [ Links ]

CHEN, Z.; NUNES, M.A.; SILVA, M.C; RODRIGUES Jr., C.J. Appressorium turgor pressure of Colletotrichum kahawae might have a role in coffee cuticle penetration. Mycologia, Lawrence, v.96, p.1199-1208, 2004.         [ Links ]

CURRY, K.J.; ABRIL, M.; AVANT, J.B.; SMITH, B.J. Strawberry anthracnose: histopathology of Colletotrichum acutatum and Colletotrichum fragariae. Phytopathology, St Paul, v.92, p.1055-1063, 2002.         [ Links ]

DIEGUEZ-URIBEONDO, J.; FORSTER, H.; SOTO-ESTRADA, A.; ADASKAVEG, J.E. Subcuticular-intracellular hemibiotrophic and intercellular necrotrophic development of Colletotrichum acutatum on almond. Phytopathology, St Paul, v.95, p.751-758, 2005.         [ Links ]

EMMETT, R.W.; PARBERY, D.G. Appressoria. Annual Review of Phytopathology, Palo Alto, v.13, p.147-167, 1975.         [ Links ]

JEFFRIES, P.; DODD, J.C.; JEGER, M.J.; PLUMBLEY, R.A. The biology and control of Colletotrichum species on tropical fruit crops. Plant Pathology. London, v.39, p.343-366, 1990.         [ Links ]

KÖLLER, W. The plant cuticle: a barrier to be overcome by fungal plant pathogens. In: COLE, G.T.; HOCH, H.C. (Ed.). The fungal spore and disease initiation in plants and animals. New York: Plenum Press, 1991. cap. 10, p. 219-246.         [ Links ]

KUMAR, V.; GUPTA, V.P.; BABU, A.M.; MISHRA, R.K.; THIAGARAJAN, V.; DATTA, R.K. Surface ultrastructural studies on penetration and infection process of Colletotrichum gloeosporioides on mulberry leaf causing black spot disease. Journal of Phytopathololgy, Berlin, v.149, p.629-633, 2001.         [ Links ]

LATUNDE-DADA, A.O.; O'CONNELL, R.J.; NASH, C.; PRING, R.J.; LUCAS, J.A.; BAILEY, J.A. Infection process and identity of the hemibiotrophic anthracnose fungus (Colletotrichum destructivum) from cowpea (Vigna unguiculata). Mycological Research, Cambridge, v.100, p.1133-1141, 1996.         [ Links ]

LIM, T.K.; MANICOM, B.Q. Disease of guava. In: PLOETZ, R.C. (Ed.). Diseases of tropical fruit crops. Homestead: CABI Publishing, 2003. cap. 12, p. 275-289.         [ Links ]

LINS, S.R.O.; ABREU, M.S.; ALVES, E. Estudos histopatológicos de Colletotrichum spp. em plântulas de cafeeiro. Fitopatologia Brasileira, Brasília, v.32, p.488-495, 2007.         [ Links ]

LOPEZ, A.M.Q. Taxonomia, patogênese e controle de espécies do gênero Colletotrichum. Revisão Anual de Patologia de Plantas, Passo Fundo, v.9, p.291-339, 2001.         [ Links ]

MILLS, P.R.; SREENIVASAPRASAD, S.; BROWN, A.E. Detection and differentiation of Colletotrichum gloeosporioides isolates using PCR. FEMS Microbiology Letters, Amsterdam, v.98, p.137-144, 1992.         [ Links ]

MOULD, M.J.R.; BOLAND, G.J.; ROBB, J. Ultrastrucuture of the Colletotrichum trifolli Medicago sativa pathosystem. 1. Pre-penetration events. Physiological and Molecular Plant Pathology, London, v.38, p.179-194, 1991a.         [ Links ]

MOULD, M.J.R.; BOLAND, G.J.; ROBB, J. Ultrastrucuture of the Colletotrichum trifolli Medicago sativa pathosystem. 1. Pos-penetration events. Physiological and Molecular Plant Pathology, London, v.38, p.195-210, 1991b.         [ Links ]

O'CONNELL, R.; PERFECT, S.; HUGHES, B.; CARZANIGA, R.; BAILEY, J.; GREEN, J. Dissecting the cell biology of Colletotrichum infection processes. In: PRUSKY, D.; FREEMAN, S.; DICKMAN, M.B. (Ed.). Colletotrichum: host specificity, pathology and host-pathogen interation. Minnessota: APS Press, 2000. cap. 5, p. 57-77.         [ Links ]

O'CONNELL, R.J.; BAILEY, J.A.; RICHMOND, D.V. Cytology and physiology of infection of Phaseolus vulgaris by Colletotrichum lindemuthianum. Physiological Plant Pathology, Berlin, v.27, p.75-98, 1985.         [ Links ]

O'CONNELL, R.J.; URONU, A.B.; WAKSMAN, G.; NASH, C.; KEON, J.P.R.; BAILEY, J.A. Hemibiotrophic infection of Pisum sativum by Colletotrichum truncatum. Plant Pathology, London, v.42, p.774-783, 1993.         [ Links ]

PEREIRA, F.M.; MARTINEZ Jr., M. Goiabas para industrialização. Jaboticabal: Editora Legis Summa, 1986. 142p.         [ Links ]

PERES, N.A.; TIMMER, L.W.; ADASKAVEG, J.E.; CORRELL, J.C. Lifestyles of Colletotrichum acutatum. Plant Disease, St Paul, v.89, p.784-796, 2005.         [ Links ]

PERFECT, S.E.; HUGLES, H.B.; O'CONNELL, R.J.; GREEN, J.R. Colletotrichum - A model genus for studies on pathology and fungal-plant interations. Fungal Genetics and Biology, Orlando, v.27, p.186-198, 1999.         [ Links ]

PICCININ, E; PASCHOLATI, S.F.; DI PIERO, R.M. Doenças da goiabeira. In: KIMATI, H.; AMORIM, L.; REZENDE, J.A.M; .BERGAMIN FILHO, A.; CAMARGO, L.E.A. (Ed.). Manual de fitopatologia, 4.ed. São Paulo: Editora Ceres, 2005. v.2, cap. 44, p. 401-409.         [ Links ]

PRING, R.J.; NASH, C.; ZAKARIA, M.; BAILEY, J.A. Infection process and host range of Colletotrichum capsici. Physiological and Molecular Plant Pathology, London, v. 46, p. 137-152, 1995.         [ Links ]

PRUSKY, D.; FREEMAN, S.; DICKMAN, M.B. Colletotrichum: host specificity, pathology and host-pathogen interation. Minnessota: APS Press, 2000. 393 p.         [ Links ]

SHEN, S.H.; GOODWIN, P.; HSIANG, T. Hemibiotrophic infection and identity of the fungus, Colletotrichum destructivum, causing anthracnose of tobacco. Mycological Research, Cambridge, v. 105, p. 1340-1347, 2001.         [ Links ]

SMITH, J.E.; KORSTEN, L.; AVELING, T.A.S. Infection process of Colletotrichum dematium on cowpea stems. Mycological Research, Cambridge, v. 103, p. 230-234, 1999.         [ Links ]

VILLANUEVA-ARCE, R.; CARDENAS-SORIANO, E.; HERNANDEZ-ANGUIANO, A.M.; MORA-AGUILERA, A.; TELIZ-ORTIZ, D. Pathogenesis of anthracnose (Colletotrichum fragariae) in cherimoya fruits. Agrociencia, Chapingo, v. 40, p. 773-782, 2006.         [ Links ]

WHARTON, P.S.; JULIAN, A.M.; O'CONNELL, R.J. Ultrastructure of the Infection of Sorghum bicolor by Colletotrichum sublineolum. Phytopathology, Sant Paul, v.91, p.149-158, 2001.         [ Links ]

WHARTON, P.S.; SCHILDER, A.C. Novel infection strategies of Colletotrichum acutatum on ripe blueberry fruit. Plant Pathology, London, v.57, p.122-134, 2008.         [ Links ]

WILSON, L.L.; MADDEN, L.V.; ELLIS, M.A. Influence of temperature and wetness duration on infection of immature and mature strawberry fruit by Colletotrichum acutatum. Phytopathology, Saint Paul, v.80, n. 1, p. 111-116, 1990.         [ Links ]

 

 

Recebido em: 07-11-2011.
Aceito para publicação em: 01-04-2013.

 

 

1 (Trabalho 256-11).

Creative Commons License Todo o conteúdo deste periódico, exceto onde está identificado, está licenciado sob uma Licença Creative Commons