Print version ISSN 0100-3984
Radiol Bras vol.45 no.3 São Paulo May/June 2012
ICONOGRAPHIC ESSAY ENSAIO ICONOGRÁFICO
Common findings and pseudolesions at computed tomography colonography: pictorial essay*
Augusto Castelli von AtzingenI; Dario Ariel TiferesII; Carlos Alberto MatsumotoIII; Thiago Franchi NunesIV; Marcos Vinicius Alvim Soares MaiaV; Giuseppe D'IppolitoVI
IMD, Fellow PhD degree of
Clinical Radiology, Universidade Federal de São Paulo (Unifesp), São Paulo, SP,
IIPhD, MD, Radiologist, Abdominal Imaging Section, Department of Imaging Diagnosis, Universidade Federal de São Paulo (Unifesp), São Paulo, SP, Brazil
IIIMD, Radiologist, Abdominal Imaging Section, Department of Imaging Diagnosis, Universidade Federal de São Paulo (Unifesp), São Paulo, SP, Brazil
IVMD, Radiologist, Fellow Master degree of Clinical Radiology, Abdominal Imaging Section Universidade Federal de São Paulo (Unifesp), São Paulo, SP, Brazil
VMD, Radiologist, Fellow of Abdominal Imaging Section, Department of Imaging Diagnosis, Universidade Federal de São Paulo (Unifesp), São Paulo, SP, Brazil
VIAssociate Professor, Department of Imaging Diagnosis, Universidade Federal de São Paulo (Unifesp), São Paulo, SP, Brazil
Computed tomography colonography is a minimally invasive method for screening for polyps and colorectal cancer, with extremely unusual complications, increasingly used in the clinical practice. In the last decade, developments in bowel preparation, imaging, and in the training of investigators have determined a significant increase in the method sensitivity. Images interpretation is accomplished through a combined analysis of two-dimensional source images and several types of three-dimensional renderings, with sensitivity around 96% in the detection of lesions with dimensions equal or greater than 10 mm in size, when analyzed by experienced radiologists. The present pictorial essay includes examples of diseases and pseudolesions most frequently observed in this type of imaging study. The authors present examples of flat and polypoid lesions, benign and malignant lesions, diverticular disease of the colon, among other conditions, as well as pseudolesions, including those related to inappropriate bowel preparation and misinterpretation.
Keywords: Colonography; Computed tomography; Colorectal neoplasm; Colonic polyps.
Computed tomography colonography (CTC), or virtual colonoscopy, is an imaging method based on the acquisition of multiple sections obtained by multidetector computed tomography (MDCT), generating sectional views of the colon that later can be reformatted in multiple planes and also processed in to allow endoluminal navigation, as in optical colonoscopy (OC)(1) . Among its main advantages, this method is fast, as the examination is performed in less than 15 minutes, without requiring sedation. For over a decade, CTC has been utilized in the investigation of colonic polyps and colorectal cancer (CRC). Developments in the clinical and epidemiological knowledge on CRC and the many technological advances incorporated by CTC have transformed the method from an investigation tool into a viable option for CRC screening(24) .
The method is less invasive than OC for the screening of polyps and may preferably be utilized in asymptomatic individuals with low risk for development of CRC, in those who do not wish or cannot undergo OC, and in those cases where OC is incomplete(3) . On the other hand, CTC presents some limitations as compared to OC in what concerns the impossibility of performing biopsies and the exposure to ionizing radiation(2) .
In spite of CTC having been introduced more than a decade ago, studies locally undertaken and published in the Brazilian literature are still scarce(5,6) .
The present essay is aimed at demonstrating the findings of the most common colonic lesions and pseudolesions observed at virtual colonoscopy and familiarizing the readers with the main technical features of the method.
Bowel preparation if essential in CTC, in order to facilitate the detection of lesions and minimize the occurrence false-positive findings(7) . It consists of the cleansing of the large bowel by means of a low residue diet for two days, and the use of non-irritating osmotic laxatives (bysacodil or macrogol) and antiflatulent drugs (simethicone). The utilization of either iodinated (ioxitalamic acid) or barium sulphate oral contrast agent is also indicated to label non-eliminated fecal residues and to facilitate the differentiation of pseudolesions(7) . Iodinated contrast agent is most frequently utilized and is administered in the 12 hours preceding the CTC examination, by means of ingestion of 50 ml of the agent diluted in 200 ml of water(7) .
The images acquisition is done with the patient in dorsal and ventral decubitus, during apnea, after colonic distension with ambient air, according to patient's tolerance(8) . The scans are preferably performed with tomography apparatuses with 16 or more detector rows. In the present study, a 64-detector-row CT apparatus (Brilliance 64; Philips Medical Systems, Cleveland, OH, USA) was utilized, and all the examinations were made with 64 × 0.625 mm collimation, slice thickness of 2 mm, reconstruction interval of 1 mm, pitch of 1079, rotation time of 0.5 s, and 120 kV and 60 mAs per section. The equivalent radiation dose per examination was, on average, 10 mSv, ranging between 6 and 19 mSv depending upon patients' size. No antispasmodic drug was utilized in the present study. The post-processing of the images was performed by means of the software package with volume-rendering capabilities (Philips Brilliance Workspace; Philips Medical Systems, Cleveland, OH, USA), with 2D multiplanar reformation and endoluminal navigation with virtual 3D colon dissection technique (Figures 1, 2 and 3).
Most of the CRCs develop from adenomatous polyps. The minute, small and large polyps risk for malignant transformation corresponds to 0.08%, 0.7% and 15.7% respectively(3) . Polyps may be either sessile or pedunculated; the first ones are most frequently found. The prevalence of polyps in the population is high and increases with age, ranging from 20% to 25% at 50 years, to 50% between 75 and 80 years of age. Recent studies on CTC describe a sensitivity of the method of up to 96% in the detection of polyps = 10 mm and 88% for polyps between 6 and 9 mm(9) . At CTC, polyps present soft tissue density, with enhancement after intravenous contrast injection, and are fixed at change in decubitus (Figures 4, 5 and 6).
Adenocarcinoma is the most common primary malignant tumor of the colon, with 30% of the cases being found in the rectum and 20% in the sigmoid. Synchronous carcinomas are present in 5% of the cases, which increases the need to perform CTC in patients whose OCs are incomplete because of the presence of stenosing lesion (Figure 7). A periodic population screening is recommended after the age of 50. CTC presents sensitivity and specificity of 96% in the detection of CRC(3,9) . An additional advantage of CTC is allowing, simultaneously, distant staging after intravenous contrast injection (Figures 8 and 9). At CTC, infiltrating CRC is characterized by asymmetrical, irregular parietal thickening that may extend to the pericolic fat and structures.
Inflammatory colorectal disease
Crohn's disease and ulcerative rectocolitis are the most common inflammatory disorders. Ulcerative rectocolitis typically initiates in the rectum and extends towards the proximal colon, with inflammation restricted to the mucosa and the submucosa (Figures 10 and 11). Crohn's disease is a granulomatous inflammatory disease which may affect the whole gastrointestinal tract, but is most frequently observed in the terminal ileum and in the cecum(10) . The utilization of CTC in cases of intestinal inflammatory disorders and hereditary colon syndromes is controversial and is routinely contraindicated. Notwithstanding such a controversy, CTC may be useful as an alternative strategy with a supplementary character in the diagnosis(11) .
Colonic diverticular disease
Colonic diverticular disease is the most common colonic disease, associated with diet-related factors, and may affect any part of the large bowel, but it is most commonly found in the sigmoid and very rarely in the rectum. At CTC, cases of advanced diverticular diseases are frequently observed, with segmental parietal thickening(11) (Figure 12). In order to avoid complications, CTC should be performed between four and six weeks after the conservative treatment of diverticulitis and previously performed biopsies(8,11) .
Lipoma is the most common mesenchymal tumor, which develops from the submucosa and may be large, with a predominantly extraluminal appearance. The ileocecal valve is most commonly affected. The CTC allows the diagnosis confirmation based on the presence of fat content(11) (Figures 13 and 14).
It is estimated that 12% to 37% of the women with endometriosis also present implants in the gastrointestinal tract, with the rectum and the sigmoid colon the most affected locations(11) . At CTC, endometriosis presents as a lesion with extramucosal retractile appearance and as focal intestinal wall thickening (Figure 15). The usefulness of CTC in endometriosis lies in the definition of the extent of the disease in cases where submucosal and infiltrative lesions simulating CRC are identified at OC(11) .
Fecal residue (polypoid-like)
It is the most common pseudolesion and differs from true polyps for being mobile, presenting heterogeneous attenuation and many times with intermingled gas, tending to present geometrical morphology. The bowel preparation with contrast agent ingestion is useful for labeling non-eliminated fecal residues, allowing their differentiation from true polyps(11) (Figures 16 and 17).
Ileocecal valve is a lip-shaped structure and frequently accumulates fat, sometimes simulating polypoid lesions and lipomas(11) (Figure 18).
The presence of an inverted appendicular stump after appendectomy may simulate a polyp. The typical location and coronal reformation may be useful for recognizing such pseudolesion(7) (Figures 19 and 20).
The technical aspects related to bowel preparation and acquisition of CTC images, as well as the knowledge of the main characteristics of lesions and pseudolesions are of utmost importance to ensure the high performance of the method in the screening for colorectal neoplasias.
1. Klabunde CN. Trends in the use and quality of colorectal cancer screening in the U.S. Presented at: NIH State-of-the-Science Conference: Enhancing Use and Quality of Colorectal Cancer Screening; February 24, 2010; Bethesda, MD, USA. [ Links ]
2. Levin B, Lieberman DA, McFarland, et al. Screening and surveillance for the early detection of colorectal cancer adenomatous polyps, 2008: a joint guideline from the American Cancer Society, the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer, and the American College of Radiology. CA Cancer J Clin. 2008;58:13060. [ Links ]
3. Pickhardt PJ, Hassan C, Halligan S, et al. Colorectal cancer: CT colonography and colonoscopy for detection systematic review and meta-analysis. Radiology. 2011;259:393405. [ Links ]
4. Kim DH, Pickhardt PJ, Taylor AJ, et al. CT colonography versus colonoscopy for the detection of advanced neoplasia. N Engl J Med. 2007; 357:140312. [ Links ]
5. Ramos O Jr, Boguszewski CL, Teixeira S, et al. Performance of computed tomographic colonography for the screening of colorectal polyp in acromegalic patients: a prospective study. Arq. Gastroenterol. 2009;46:906. [ Links ]
6. Pfeifer GK, Corleta O, Gus P. Avaliação do desempenho da colonografia tomográfica computadorizada (colonoscopia virtual) no diagnóstico de pólipos colorretais. Arq. Gastroenterol. 2008;45: 3017. [ Links ]
7. Mang T, Maier A, Plank C, et al. Pitfalls in multi-detector row CT colonography: a systematic approach. Radiographics. 2007;27:43154. [ Links ]
8. Kim DH, Pickhardt PJ. Colonic distention for CT colonography. In: Pickhardt PJ, Kim DH, editors. CT colonography: principles and practice of virtual colonoscopy. 1st ed. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders Elsevier; 2010. p. 13147. [ Links ]
9. Rosenberg JA, Rubin DT. Performance of CT colonography in clinical trials. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 2010;20:193207. [ Links ]
10. Costa-Silva L, Martins T, Passos MCF. Enterografia por tomografia computadorizada: experiência inicial na avaliação das doenças do intestino delgado. Radiol Bras. 2010;43:3038. [ Links ]
11. Pickhardt PJ, Kim DH. Indications of performing CT colonography. In: Pickhardt PJ, Kim DH, editors. CT colonography: principles and practice of virtual colonoscopy. 1st ed. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders Elsevier; 2010. p. 72390. [ Links ]
Mailing Address: Received December 5, 2011. * Study developed at Abdominal Imaging Section, Department of Imaging Diagnosis,
Escola Paulista de Medicina Universidade Federal de São Paulo (Unifesp), and
at Laboratório Fleury Medicina e Saúde, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Dr. Giuseppe D'Ippolito.
Rua Professor Filadelfo Azevedo, 617, ap. 61, Vila Nova Conceição.
São Paulo, SP, Brazil, 04508-011.
Accepted after revision February 24, 2012.
Received December 5, 2011.
* Study developed at Abdominal Imaging Section, Department of Imaging Diagnosis, Escola Paulista de Medicina Universidade Federal de São Paulo (Unifesp), and at Laboratório Fleury Medicina e Saúde, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.