versão impressa ISSN 0100-3984
Radiol Bras vol.45 no.4 São Paulo jul./ago. 2012
Tenosynovitis and synovitis of the first extensor compartment of the wrist: what sonographers should know*
Carlos Frederico Arend
MD, Radiologist at Radimagem Diagnóstico por Imagem, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
Tenosynovitis of the first dorsal compartment of the wrist is a condition surrounded by myths. The aim of this paper is scientifically review relevant aspects about terminology, pathophysiology, diagnosis, and follow-up of this condition.
Keywords: Tenosynovitis; Ultrasonography; Quervain; Review.
Tenosynovitis of the first extensor compartment of the wrist is a common condition, surrounded by myths. In the recent years, there is a growing interest in the utilization of ultrasonography either as a diagnostic tool or as a forensic tool in medical-legal litigations involving the disease. The present article is aimed at scientifically reviewing some of the most relevant aspects regarding terminology, physiopathogenesis, diagnosis and follow-up of tenosynovitis of the first extensor compartment of the wrist.
Tenosynovitis of the first extensor compartment of the wrist is also recognized as De Quervain's tenosynovitis after the Swiss surgeon Fritz de Quervain, who was also famous for his studies on the thyroid gland. However, the appropriateness of such eponym is controversial, since the original article simultaneously describes the cases of three physicians, Quervain, Sandos and Kocher, the latter having formerly been boss of Quervain and a Nobel prize winner in 1909 for his studies on the thyroid gland(1). The pioneerism in these reports is also questionable, since a very similar clinical entity had been described about 20 years before by Henry Gray on his classical anatomy book, where the term washerwoman's sprain was coined(2).
The term tenosynovitis is also somewhat inappropriate, since the main histological marker for the condition is the mucopolysaccharide deposition in the tendon sheath, indicating degenerative process(3,4). More precisely, the external reticular layer of the sheath is histologically normal, while the internal layer demonstrates myxoid or mucinous degeneration, and the central layer demonstrates vascular proliferation, and macrophage infiltration. Despite this remark, the authors routinely use the term tenosynovitis to describe the tendon sheath thickening in order to facilitate the communication with the referring physician. Fluid distension of the tendon sheath, without associated parietal thickening or tendon abnormalities, is described as synovitis. In the present paper, the term tenosynovitis is liberally utilized to describe the clinical syndrome and not the anatomopathological diagnosis.
To the best of the author's knowledge, there is no scientific evidence indicating that the condition is caused by occupational or recreational overuse. Conversely, the analysis of historical series documents its higher prevalence among women over the centuries, even at times when only men effectively participated in the manual, repetitive work.
Therefore, even though overuse may exacerbate symptoms, the cause of tenosynovitis is widely unknown, with a probable predominant role of sex-related genetic factors. An illustrative comparison can be made with patients suffering from ischemic heart disease, in whom excessive physical activity exacerbates symptoms, but does not cause the disease. The legal implications of the semantic difference between the verbs cause and exacerbate are considerable and must be emphasized.
Genetic factors may equally predispose individuals to anatomical variations in the first compartment such as vertical septum and accessory tendons of the abductor pollicis longus, both considered as risk factors for development of tenosynovitis. Besides predisposing to the development of anatomical variations, genetic factors may also be involved in the physiopathogenesis while modulating individual's sensitivity to pain and psychological profile.
The diagnosis of tenosynovitis of the first extensor compartment of the wrist has been historically based on the finding of pain over the styloid process of the radius that is exacerbated with thumb and wrist movement. Crepitation and triggering may also be rarely observed. However, most recently, a worrisome question on the subjectivity and reproducibility of the clinical diagnosis in medical-legal litigations has emerged, and helped to popularize the use of ultrasound in the assessment of the patients. In this context, it is widely known that there may be discrepancies between the clinical and sonographic diagnoses. The choice between clinical assessment and imaging evaluation as the best diagnostic method is controversial, with fervorous supporters in both sides. A relevant factor contributing to such controversy is the lack of a gold standard, so the comparison between different methods is complex and imperfect. In the authors' opinion the evaluation by the referring physician is sovereign to determine the treatment, but not to establish the anatomical diagnosis. Regardless such uproar, it is interesting to recognize the correct terminology of clinical tests frequently used in the clinical assessment of these patients, which could be utilized as a strong argument to neutralize those who heavily criticize the virtues of the imaging modality. In fact, no other area of semiology has a misconception so deeply rooted as the Finkelstein's test. Over the years, several variations of the test have been described without taking historical background into consideration, which has lead to innumerable redundant, ambiguous and equivocal designations. In order to solve such misunderstandings, one should get back to 1930, when Finkelstein published his classical article describing the original technique for assessing patients with tenosynovitis of the first extensor compartment(5) (Figure 1A): "On grasping the patient's thumb and quickly abducting the hand ulnarward, the pain over the styloid tip is excruciating. This is probably the most pathognomonic objective sign."
At that time, other physicians shared the Filkelstein's interest in the assessment of individuals with tenosynovitis of the first extensor compartment, including Eichoff, who had published his work in 1927(6). The Eichoff's report, however, had poor global penetration, possibly because it was written in a non-English language. Ironically, it was Finkelstein himself who first translated into English and published the description of the clinical test created by Eichoff, duly referencing his peer(5) (Figure 1B): "Eichoff explains... a simple experiment... if one places the thumb within the hand and holds it tightly with the other fingers, and then bends the hand severely in ulnar abduction, an intense pain is experienced on the styloid process of the radius, exactly at the place where the tendon sheath takes its course."
For unknown reasons, the historical correction has faded away over time. In the recent years, with few exceptions(7,8), a number of textbooks and scientific papers have been unfair to Eichoff, as they mentioned the maneuver of grasping the thumb in the palm of the hand as Finkelstein's test.
In the authors' routine, ultrasound examination is performed while the patient comfortably rests the ulnar aspect of his hand on the examination table, utilizing only one focal zone of the equipment adjusted for the depth of the first extensor compartment. The investigation often requires generous amount of conductive gel on the skin surface in order to bring the region of interest into the focal zone. The transducer is placed transversely, adjacent to the radial tubercle, over the second extensor compartment. From the second extensor compartment, the transducer is moved to transversely scan the first extensor compartment, adjacent to the radial styloid process. The extensor pollicis brevis (EPB) and abductor pollicis longus (APL) occupy the first extensor compartment. A useful tip to memorize the names of the extensor tendons passing over the dorsal wrist consists in recognizing that their surnames alternate between longus and brevis as they advance towards the ulnar direction from the first to the third compartment: abductor pollicis longus, extensor pollicis brevis, extensor carpi radialis longus, extensor carpi radialis brevis and extensor pollicis longus. In the first compartment, the abductor pollicis longus is thicker than the extensor pollicis brevis, which should not be confused with disease. The synovial sheath is depicted as a thin structure that surrounds the echogenic tendon fibers.
On ultrasound, the typical finding of tenosynovitis is the thickening and hypoechogenicity of the tendon sheath at the level of the radial styloid process (Figure 2). We rely on the subjectivity rather than on a mathematical definition of sheath thickening, which reinforces the relevance of the experience of the examiner, particularly because tendon sheath usually measures less than 1 mm thick. Contralateral comparison may be useful to identify subtle lesions. In chronic cases, bone erosion may be associated (Figure 3). More rarely, the tendon sheath has normal thickness, but there is fluid distension of the compartment caused by synovitis (Figure 4). The examination does not end with the diagnosis, since predisposing factors such as vertical septum and accessory tendons must be actively investigated as a cause of synovitis or secondary tenosynovitis. The role of these anatomical variations as risk factor for development of disease is intuitive, in the first case, with space reduction, and in the second case, with increase in the compartment contents.
Vertical septum may be present in up to half of cases. It divides the first compartment into a ventral larger area, that contains the abductor pollicis longus, and a dorsal smaller space, that contains the extensor pollicis brevis(9). Subcompartimentalization and incomplete tenosynovitis is defined as vertical septum restricting the process to the sheath that surrounds only one of the tendons (Figure 5).
Accessory tendons of the abductor pollicis longus are other recognized predisposing factor for the development of tenosynovitis of the first extensor compartment. Its detection is rather intuitive, distally to the radial styloid process where the sheath thickening is not so noticeable (Figure 6).
Although the usefulness of ultrasonography in the diagnosis of tenosynovitis of the first extensor compartment is unquestionable, its role in the follow-up is not established. In the follow-up of more than 200 patients over the last ten years, we have never observed resolution of the tendon sheath thickening after conservative treatment, thus we do not recommend sonographic follow-up to record the disappearance of the process after symptoms remission. Curiously, the authors' personal experience demonstrates that follow-up examination in patients who became asymptomatic after treatment are counterproductive and usually trigger symptoms relapse as the patient is informed about the persistence of the anatomic injury (Figure 7). Sheath thickening is not an inflammatory or infectious process (like sinusitis and pneumonia), but rather a degenerative phenomenon (like osteoarthritis). Thus, the treatment is not aimed at correcting an already-established anatomic injury, but rather at improving symptoms and slowing the progression of the disease. The authors' experience in the follow-up after surgical treatment is more positive, with some cases demonstrating complete sheath thickening regression (Figure 8). Synovitis is morphologically less refractory and fluid distension of the sheath usually disappears after conservative management.
Tenosynovitis of the first extensor compartment of the wrist is a common condition, with controversial terminology and poorly known physiopathology. In this group of patients, ultrasonography can differentiate tenosynovitis from synovitis, the first one being an eminently inflammatory condition, and the later, predominantly degenerative. Additionally, ultrasonography can identify anatomical elements such as vertical septum and accessory tendons of the abductor pollicis longus, both potentially responsible for symptoms refractoriness, which may guide the adoption of a more aggressive management.
1. de Quervain F. Ueber das Wesen und die Behandlung des stenosierenden Tendovaginitis am Processus styloideus radii. Munch Med Wochenschr. 1912;59:56. [ Links ]
2. Gray H. Anatomy, descriptive and surgical. Philadelphia, PA: Lea Brothers & Co.; 1893. [ Links ]
3. Clarke MT, Lyall HA, Grant JW, et al. The histopathology of de Quervain's disease. J Hand Surg Br. 1998;23:7324. [ Links ]
4. Read HS, Hooper G, Davie R. Histological appearances in post-partum de Quervain's disease. J Hand Surg Br. 2000;25:702. [ Links ]
5. Finkelstein H. Stenosing tenovaginitis at the radial styloid process. J Bone Joint Surg. 1930;12:50940. [ Links ]
6. Eichoff E. Zur Pathogenese der Tendovaginitis stenosans. Bruns' Beitrage Z Klin Chir. 1927; CXXXIX:746. [ Links ]
7. Arend CF. Master Ultrassonografia musculoesquelética. 2ª ed. Rio de Janeiro, RJ: Revinter; 2012. [ Links ]
8. Dawson C, Mudgal CS. Staged description of the Finkelstein test. J Hand Surg Am. 2010;35:15135. [ Links ]
9. Kulthanan T, Chareonwat B. Variations in abductor pollicis longus and extensor pollicis brevis tendons in the Quervain syndrome: a surgical and anatomical study. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg. 2007;41:368. [ Links ]
Mailing Address: Received December 16,
2011. * Study developed at Radimagem Diagnóstico por Imagem, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.
Dr. Carlos Frederico Arend.
Avenida Cristóvão Colombo, 1691, Floresta.
Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil, 90560-001.
Accepted after revision June 28, 2012.
Received December 16,
* Study developed at Radimagem Diagnóstico por Imagem, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.