Acessibilidade / Reportar erro

Prenatal diagnosis of hypoplastic left heart syndrome: current knowledge

Diagnóstico pré-natal da síndrome hipoplásica do coração esquerdo: conhecimentos atuais

Abstract

Hypoplastic left heart syndrome (HLHS) is characterized by underdevelopment of the left-sided heart structures. The prenatal diagnosis of this congenital heart disease is crucial because a newborn with undiagnosed HLHS often presents with clinical signs of low cardiac output once the ductus arteriosus begins to close. With that in mind, the aim of this article was to perform a non-systematic review focusing on the key ultrasound features that can be used in the prenatal diagnosis of HLHS. Severe forms of HLHS are characterized by a markedly abnormal four-chamber view of the fetal heart (small left atrium, hypoplastic left ventricle, or abnormal mitral valve). The left ventricular outflow tract view allows the degree of hypoplasia in the tract to be evaluated and the diameter of the ascending aorta to be measured. The Z-scores are intended to aid in the diagnosis and follow-up of HLHS. In mild forms of HLHS, a right ventricle/left ventricle length ratio > 1.28 was the strongest predictor of a univentricular outcome.

Keywords:
Prenatal diagnosis; Echocardiography; Prenatal screening; Hypoplastic left heart syndrome

Resumo

A síndrome do coração esquerdo hipoplásico (SCEH) é caracterizada pelo subdesenvolvimento das estruturas cardíacas do lado esquerdo. O diagnóstico pré-natal dessa cardiopatia congênita é crucial, uma vez que recém-nascido com SCEH não diagnosticado apresenta, frequentemente, sinais clínicos de baixo débito cardíaco, quando o canal arterial começa a se fechar. Por isso, o objetivo deste artigo foi realizar uma revisão não sistemática sobre as principais características ultrassonográficas que podem ser usadas no diagnóstico pré-natal da SCEH. As formas graves de SCEH são caracterizadas por plano de quatro câmaras marcadamente anormal (átrio esquerdo pequeno, ventrículo esquerdo hipoplásico, válvula mitral anormal) do coração fetal. A visualização da via de saída do ventrículo esquerdo permite a avaliação do grau de hipoplasia dessa via e a mensuração da aorta ascendente. Os escores Z têm como objetivo auxiliar no diagnóstico e acompanhamento da SCEH. Nas formas leves da SCEH, a relação comprimento do ventrículo direito/comprimento do ventrículo esquerdo > 1,28 foi a variável mais forte para identificar o desfecho univentricular.

Unitermos:
Diagnóstico pré-natal; Ecocardiografia; Triagem pré-natal; Síndrome do coração esquerdo hipoplásico

INTRODUCTION

Hypoplastic left heart syndrome (HLHS) accounts for 1.4-3.8% of all cases of congenital heart disease (CHD) and is responsible for 23% of cardiac deaths occurring in the first week of life. It is characterized by underdevelopment of the left-sided cardiac structures. Prenatal diagnosis of HLHS is critical because a neonate with undiagnosed HLHS often presents with clinical signs of low cardiac output as the ductus arteriosus begins to close, with compromised systemic perfusion(11 Grossfeld P, Nie S, Lin L, et al. Hypoplastic left heart syndrome: a new paradigm for an old disease? J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2019;6:10.). In addition, a restrictive foramen ovale (FO) accompanied by HLHS will require surgical intervention to open the interatrial septum in utero or immediately after birth. In this scenario, prenatal diagnosis is even more critical. Therefore, in this study, we review the ultrasound features relevant to the prenatal diagnosis of HLHS.

HLHS - TERMINOLOGY AND MORPHOLOGY

The term HLHS describes a spectrum of cardiac malformations characterized by underdevelopment of the left side of the heart with severe obstruction of the left ventricular inflow and outflow tracts. In this context, it is important to note that the main morphological features of this CHD are hypoplasia of the left ventricle (LV) and its outflow tract(22 Anderson RH, Crucean A, Spicer DE. What is the hypoplastic left heart syndrome? J Cardiovas Dev Dis. 2023;10:133.). In addition, the International Nomenclature Society has specified that HLHS encompasses a spectrum of CHD in which LV underdevelopment is associated with normally aligned great arteries without a common atrioventricular junction. Such features may help us distinguish HLHS from functionally univentricular hearts, which are defined as “a spectrum of congenital cardiac malformations in which the ventricular mass does not readily lend itself to partitioning that commits one ventricular pump to the systemic circulation, and another to the pulmonary circulation”(33 Jacobs JP. Hypoplastic left heart syndrome: definition, morphology, and classification. World J Pediatr Congenit Heart Surg. 2022; 13:559-64.).

As previously described, it is well established that hearts with discordant atrioventricular or ventriculoarterial connections or with double outflow tracts or a common atrioventricular valve should not be included under the term HLHS. However, there is no consensus regarding whether the integrity or not of the interventricular septum should be considered one of the morphological features of HLHS(44 Tchervenkov CI, Jacobs JP, Weinberg PM, et al. The nomenclature, definition and classification of hypoplastic left heart syndrome. Cardiol Young. 2006;16:339-68.). In a recent review, Anderson et al.(22 Anderson RH, Crucean A, Spicer DE. What is the hypoplastic left heart syndrome? J Cardiovas Dev Dis. 2023;10:133.) speculated that the likely allusion to the term syndrome grouping lesions with hypoplasia of the left heart was first described by Noonan et al.(55 Noonan JA, Nadas AS. The hypoplastic left heart syndrome; an analysis of 101 cases. Pediatr Clin North Am. 1958;5:1029-56.). In their patients, the interventricular septum was categorized as either intact or not. However, when Lev(66 Lev M. Pathologic anatomy and interrelationship of hypoplasia of the aortic tract complexes. Lab Invest. 1952;1:61-70.) reviewed the cases to be included in “hypoplasia of the aortic tract complex”, he decided to include those with an intact interventricular septum. Anderson et al.(22 Anderson RH, Crucean A, Spicer DE. What is the hypoplastic left heart syndrome? J Cardiovas Dev Dis. 2023;10:133.) recommend that hearts with left ventricular hypoplasia should be divided as follows (Table 1): hearts with an intact ventricular septum; and hearts with a ventricular septal defect. The findings show that when the ventricular septum is intact, the hearts can be interpreted as having the characteristics of a disease acquired in fetal life.

Table 1
The main morphological features of HLHS.

In addition to hypoplasia of the LV and aorta, the main anatomical features of HLHS are as follows: stenotic or atretic aortic and mitral valves; small or hypoplastic left atrium (LA); dilated right ventricle (RV, the dominant ventricle) with dilatation of the pulmonary artery trunk; and LV fibroelastosis in the presence of significant aortic atresia or stenosis, due to intrauterine coronary underflow. In the classic form of HLHS, the hearts have severe hypoplastic LV and atresia of the mitral and aortic valves.

Chromosomal abnormalities, such as Turner syndrome (45,X), trisomy 13, and trisomy 18, are seen in conjunction with HLHS in 4-5% of cases. In addition to genetic disorders such as Noonan syndrome, extracardiac anomalies are found in 10-25% of fetuses with HLHS(33 Jacobs JP. Hypoplastic left heart syndrome: definition, morphology, and classification. World J Pediatr Congenit Heart Surg. 2022; 13:559-64.). The main associated malformations in HLHS are described in Table 2.

Table 2
The main associated anomalies in HLHS.

METHODS

For this non-systematic review, a search strategy was developed to identify articles published in English in the PubMed/PMC databases between 2018 and 2023. The following MeSH terms were used: “prenatal diagnosis”, “cardiac ultrasound screening”, “fetal echocardiography”, and “hypoplastic left heart syndrome”. Using the search terms above, we selected a total of 36 articles based on their titles and abstracts. Case reports and duplicate studies were excluded, as were studies on epidemiology or fetal cardiac interventions in HLHS, or even on the prenatal detection rate of cardiac ultrasound screening, as well as all studies in which the aim was not the prenatal ultrasound diagnosis of HLHS. On the basis of the inclusion and exclusion criteria, six full-text articles were selected for review. After the selected studies and their references had been reviewed, one study was added, making a total of seven studies.

PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS OF HLHS BY ULTRASOUND/ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY

Fetal cardiac screening guidelines and training programs can maximize CHD detection rates by adding evaluation of the ventricular outflow tracts and upper mediastinal views (three-vessel and three-vessel trachea views) to the four-chamber view for cardiac sonography screening(77 Yagel S, Arbel R, Anteby EY, et al. The three vessels and trachea view (3VT) in fetal cardiac scanning. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2002;20:340-5.

8 Carvalho JS, Axt-Fliedner R, Chaoui R, et al. ISUOG practice guidelines (updated): fetal cardiac screening. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2023;61:788-803.
-99 Moon-Grady AJ, Donofrio MT, Gelehrter S, et al. Guidelines and recommendations for performance of the fetal echocardiogram: an update from the American Society of Echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2023;36:679-723.)
. Despite the improvements in cardiac screening, major cardiac defects such as LV hypoplasia in HLHS are easily identified in the four-chamber view (Figure 1).

Figure 1
Cardiac ultrasound/echocardiography imaging showing how to scan the four-chamber view. Find the transaxial view of the fetal chest, perpendicular to the long axis of the fetus (A), and obtain a four-chamber view of the fetal heart (B). Note that, in the normal fetal heart depicted here, there is no discrepancy in the size of the ventricles and the LV forms the apex of the heart. M, mitral valve; T, tricuspid valve; RA, right atrium; Ao, aorta.

Fetuses with classic forms of HLHS (aortic and mitral atresia) have an abnormal four-chamber view with no inflow into the LV (mitral atresia). The ventricular chamber discrepancy due to the hypoplastic LV is the clue to suspect HLHS in the four-chamber view of the fetal heart. A small, thickened mitral valve, or even a muscular “bar” in mitral atresia, can be seen in the four-chamber view of the fetal heart. The absence of anterograde flow through the mitral valve on color Doppler confirms the diagnosis. Another important clue is that in these hearts the LV does not form the apex as in hearts with normal anatomy.

In cases of aortic atresia and mitral stenosis, the LV is more recognizable and the reduced size of the LA can vary depending on the form of HLHS (severe, moderate, or mild). The view of the left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) can confirm the diagnosis of HLHS by providing an evaluation of the degree of LVOT hypoplasia, making it possible to measure the ascending aorta, aortic isthmus, and descending aorta in millimeters and express them as Z-scores. The three-vessel and three-vessel trachea views allow the measurement of the ascending aorta and aortic isthmus. In cases of HLHS with aortic atresia, there is no anterograde flow across the aortic valve and a reverse flow in the aortic arch is detectable by color Doppler in the three-vessel and aortic arch views. In fact, in the upper mediastinum view, an increased pulmonary artery trunk/aorta ratio is seen due to the small aorta(1010 Bravo-Valenzuela NJ, Peixoto AB, Araujo Júnior E. Prenatal diagnosis of congenital heart disease: a review of current knowledge. Indian Heart J. 2018;70:150-64.), as illustrated in Figure 2.

Figure 2
Fetal echocardiographic finding in a case of hypoplastic left heart syndrome. In the four-chamber view (A), note the small LA, hypoplastic LV with left-right chamber discrepancy and small mitral valve (arrow). In the three-vessel trachea view (B), note the discrepancy between the great arteries due to small aorta (arrow). Ao, aorta; M, mitral valve; RA, right atrium; SVC, superior vena cava; T, tricuspid valve.

Despite advances in prenatal diagnosis and therapeutic surgical management, the coexistence of FO restriction with HLHS is still a serious problem because it is associated with high mortality. Fetuses with restrictive interatrial shunts may be candidates for percutaneous enlargement of the patent FO in utero or immediately after delivery. Analysis of the pulmonary venous Doppler pattern is a useful tool in the evaluation of FO restriction. Pulmonary vein (PV) flow with an reversed A wave, with a velocity of up to 41 cm/s, a duration of more than 88 ms, or both, should raise attention to the diagnosis of a restricted FO. In addition to these PV Doppler parameters, a low ratio of forward PV flow to reverse flow, expressed as a velocity-time integral < 3, is a good predictor of neonatal instability and postnatal emergent intervention(1111 Marshall AC, van der Velde ME, Tworetzky W, et al. Creation of an atrial septal defect in utero for fetuses with hypoplastic left heart syndrome and intact or highly restrictive atrial septum. Circulation. 2004;110:253-8.

12 Jadczak A, Respondek-Liberska M, Sokołowski Ł, et al. Hypoplastic left heart syndrome with prenatally diagnosed foramen ovale restriction: diagnosis, management and outcome. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2022;35:291-8.
-1313 Sokolowski L, Respondek-Liberska M, Pietryga M, et al. Prenatally diagnosed foramen ovale restriction in fetuses with hypoplastic left heart syndrome may be a predictor of longer hospitalization, but not of a need for an urgent rashkind procedure. Ginekol Pol. 2019;90:31-8.)
, as depicted in Figure 3.

Figure 3
Doppler of the PV in a case of HLHS with restrictive FO. Doppler pattern showing a reversed A wave with a velocity > 40 cm/s. A, atrial wave of the PV.

Prenatal assessment of RV function is important because the RV will be the dominant ventricle in the postnatal circulation after surgical intervention. On Doppler ultrasound, RV inflow should be assessed by determining the peak velocities of the E and A waves and, if available, by applying the E/E′ ratio; that is, tissue Doppler imaging(1414 Axt-Fliedner R, Graupner O, Kawecki A, et al. Evaluation of right ventricular function in fetuses with hypoplastic left heart syndrome using tissue Doppler techniques. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2015; 45:670-7.).

RECENT DEVELOPMENTS AND OPEN QUESTIONS

In a review of the literature, Bravo-Valenzuela et al.(1010 Bravo-Valenzuela NJ, Peixoto AB, Araujo Júnior E. Prenatal diagnosis of congenital heart disease: a review of current knowledge. Indian Heart J. 2018;70:150-64.) described important features to improve the prenatal diagnosis of CHD by using ultrasound. The authors described the main features of HLHS and provided images with abnormal four-chamber views of the fetal heart due to hypoplastic LV, abnormal mitral valve and RV enlargement. In fact, the PV Doppler pattern with a reversed A wave is useful for identifying an interatrial shunt in HLHS.

Recently, Ximenes et al.(1515 Ximenes RS, Bravo-Valenzuela NJ, Pares DBS, et al. The use of cardiac ultrasound imaging in first-trimester prenatal diagnosis of congenital heart diseases. J Clin Ultrasound. 2023;51:225-39.) conducted a study focusing on first-trimester ultrasound cardiac features that may allow early diagnosis of several major CHDs, including HLHS. The authors provided first-trimester ultrasound images with four-chamber views of the upper mediastinum and ventricular outflow tracts of fetuses with severe forms of HLHS, highlighting the discrepancy between the right and left cavities and between the great arteries. A small LA, hypoplastic LV, and small aorta are suggestive of a diagnosis of HLHS.

Edwards et al.(1616 Edwards LA, Arunamata A, Maskatia SA, et al. Fetal echocardiographic parameters and surgical outcomes in congenital left-sided cardiac lesions. Pediatr Cardiol. 2019;40:1304-13.) described the measurements of cardiac structures in a cohort of fetuses with suspected left-sided cardiac lesions, in which 39 fetuses had HLHS. The authors described a smaller mitral valve, shorter LV length, smaller aortic valve, lower ascending aorta Z-scores, and a higher aorta/pulmonary artery ratio, as well as higher tricuspid valve-to-mitral valve ratio and RV-to-LV length ratio, as important cardiac measurements for predicting HLHS and a univentricular outcome. Among the described measurements, RV/LV length ratio > 1.28 was the strongest variable for identifying univentricular outcome. Similarly, in cases of borderline HLHS, Haberer et al.(1717 Haberer K, Fruitman D, Power A, et al. Fetal echocardiographic predictors of biventricular circulation in hypoplastic left heart complex. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2021;58:405-10.) found that bidirectional or left-to-right FO flow, LV length Z-score < -2.4, and mitral valve length Z-score < 4.5 were predictors of a univentricular outcome in 80% of cases.

In a study conducted in China, Wu et al.(1818 Wu PF, Li RZ, Zhang R, et al. Detailed echocardiographic measurements of individual chamber in a Chinese cohort of hypoplastic left heart syndrome and comparison with normal fetuses via Z-score modeling. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2020;46:557-65.) showed that the mean Z-scores for LV length, LA diameter, and ascending aorta diameter were significantly lower (≤ 3.5) in a cohort of 79 fetuses with HLHS than in controls. The authors emphasized that the evaluation of cardiovascular Z-score equations should benefit the diagnosis and follow-up of HLHS cases.

Regarding FO restriction and HLHS, Sokolowski et al.(1313 Sokolowski L, Respondek-Liberska M, Pietryga M, et al. Prenatally diagnosed foramen ovale restriction in fetuses with hypoplastic left heart syndrome may be a predictor of longer hospitalization, but not of a need for an urgent rashkind procedure. Ginekol Pol. 2019;90:31-8.) described prenatal diagnosis of FO restriction as a predictor of long-term hospitalization, with a low positive predictive value for an urgent Rashkind procedure. Jadczak et al.(1212 Jadczak A, Respondek-Liberska M, Sokołowski Ł, et al. Hypoplastic left heart syndrome with prenatally diagnosed foramen ovale restriction: diagnosis, management and outcome. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2022;35:291-8.), in a study of HLHS associated with FO restriction, observed higher short-term mortality in cases with earlier development and longer presence of FO restriction, regardless of the degree of restriction. Those authors found that, although the PV forward/reverse flow velocity-time integral ratio is a good predictor of the need for intervention, it does not influence survival rates. In fact, they described the presence of ultrasound signs of fetal infection as a potential risk factor for FO restriction in fetuses with HLHS.

CONCLUSION

The discrepancy between the right and left cavities in the four-chamber view on cardiac ultrasound/echocardiography should alert to the diagnosis of HLHS. Severe forms of HLHS are characterized by a markedly abnormal four-chamber view of the fetal heart (small LA, hypoplastic LV, abnormal mitral valve). When the LVOT view is used, a hypoplastic aorta, hypoplastic LV, and small LA support the diagnosis of HLHS. In addition, the outflow tract view allows the assessment of the degree of LVOT hypoplasia to be assessed by measuring the ascending aorta. The Z-scores are intended to aid in the diagnosis and follow-up of HLHS. In mild forms of HLHS, a RV/LV length ratio > 1.28 appears to be the strongest variable for identifying a univentricular outcome. Earlier FO restriction is associated with higher mortality in HLHS, regardless of the degree of restriction. Assessment of the PV forward/reverse flow ratio by Doppler is useful for predicting the need for emergent intervention related to FO restriction but does not influence survival rates in HLHS. There is a need for further studies of the ultrasound parameters that can be used as predictors of mortality, and new lines of research should be developed.

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge Dr. Luciane Alves da Costa Amorim (perinatal cardiologist) for providing Figure 1A, and Ms. Liana Bravo-Valenzuela e Silva (graphic designer) for editing Figure 1B.

REFERENCES

  • 1
    Grossfeld P, Nie S, Lin L, et al. Hypoplastic left heart syndrome: a new paradigm for an old disease? J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2019;6:10.
  • 2
    Anderson RH, Crucean A, Spicer DE. What is the hypoplastic left heart syndrome? J Cardiovas Dev Dis. 2023;10:133.
  • 3
    Jacobs JP. Hypoplastic left heart syndrome: definition, morphology, and classification. World J Pediatr Congenit Heart Surg. 2022; 13:559-64.
  • 4
    Tchervenkov CI, Jacobs JP, Weinberg PM, et al. The nomenclature, definition and classification of hypoplastic left heart syndrome. Cardiol Young. 2006;16:339-68.
  • 5
    Noonan JA, Nadas AS. The hypoplastic left heart syndrome; an analysis of 101 cases. Pediatr Clin North Am. 1958;5:1029-56.
  • 6
    Lev M. Pathologic anatomy and interrelationship of hypoplasia of the aortic tract complexes. Lab Invest. 1952;1:61-70.
  • 7
    Yagel S, Arbel R, Anteby EY, et al. The three vessels and trachea view (3VT) in fetal cardiac scanning. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2002;20:340-5.
  • 8
    Carvalho JS, Axt-Fliedner R, Chaoui R, et al. ISUOG practice guidelines (updated): fetal cardiac screening. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2023;61:788-803.
  • 9
    Moon-Grady AJ, Donofrio MT, Gelehrter S, et al. Guidelines and recommendations for performance of the fetal echocardiogram: an update from the American Society of Echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2023;36:679-723.
  • 10
    Bravo-Valenzuela NJ, Peixoto AB, Araujo Júnior E. Prenatal diagnosis of congenital heart disease: a review of current knowledge. Indian Heart J. 2018;70:150-64.
  • 11
    Marshall AC, van der Velde ME, Tworetzky W, et al. Creation of an atrial septal defect in utero for fetuses with hypoplastic left heart syndrome and intact or highly restrictive atrial septum. Circulation. 2004;110:253-8.
  • 12
    Jadczak A, Respondek-Liberska M, Sokołowski Ł, et al. Hypoplastic left heart syndrome with prenatally diagnosed foramen ovale restriction: diagnosis, management and outcome. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2022;35:291-8.
  • 13
    Sokolowski L, Respondek-Liberska M, Pietryga M, et al. Prenatally diagnosed foramen ovale restriction in fetuses with hypoplastic left heart syndrome may be a predictor of longer hospitalization, but not of a need for an urgent rashkind procedure. Ginekol Pol. 2019;90:31-8.
  • 14
    Axt-Fliedner R, Graupner O, Kawecki A, et al. Evaluation of right ventricular function in fetuses with hypoplastic left heart syndrome using tissue Doppler techniques. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2015; 45:670-7.
  • 15
    Ximenes RS, Bravo-Valenzuela NJ, Pares DBS, et al. The use of cardiac ultrasound imaging in first-trimester prenatal diagnosis of congenital heart diseases. J Clin Ultrasound. 2023;51:225-39.
  • 16
    Edwards LA, Arunamata A, Maskatia SA, et al. Fetal echocardiographic parameters and surgical outcomes in congenital left-sided cardiac lesions. Pediatr Cardiol. 2019;40:1304-13.
  • 17
    Haberer K, Fruitman D, Power A, et al. Fetal echocardiographic predictors of biventricular circulation in hypoplastic left heart complex. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2021;58:405-10.
  • 18
    Wu PF, Li RZ, Zhang R, et al. Detailed echocardiographic measurements of individual chamber in a Chinese cohort of hypoplastic left heart syndrome and comparison with normal fetuses via Z-score modeling. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2020;46:557-65.

Publication Dates

  • Publication in this collection
    15 Dec 2023
  • Date of issue
    Sep-Oct 2023

History

  • Received
    03 July 2023
  • Reviewed
    17 Aug 2023
  • Accepted
    05 Sept 2023
Publicação do Colégio Brasileiro de Radiologia e Diagnóstico por Imagem Av. Paulista, 37 - 7º andar - conjunto 71, 01311-902 - São Paulo - SP, Tel.: +55 11 3372-4541, Fax: 3285-1690, Fax: +55 11 3285-1690 - São Paulo - SP - Brazil
E-mail: radiologiabrasileira@cbr.org.br