SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.36 número3Relações do ramo externo do nervo laríngeo superior com a artéria tireóidea superior: estudo em 101 nervosExpressão do P16 e do PDGFR-Beta no adenocarcinoma gástrico índice de autoresíndice de assuntospesquisa de artigos
Home Pagelista alfabética de periódicos  

Serviços Personalizados

Journal

Artigo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

Compartilhar


Revista do Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões

versão impressa ISSN 0100-6991versão On-line ISSN 1809-4546

Rev. Col. Bras. Cir. vol.36 no.3 Rio de Janeiro jul. 2009

http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0100-69912009000300003 

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

 

Quality of life after Heller-Dor's cardiomiotomy

 

 

Fernando A.V. Madureira, TCBC- RJI; Fábio A.V. Madureira, ACBC- RJII; Angelo Bustani Loss, TCBC-RJIII; Delta Madureira, TCBC-RJIV

IMSc in General Surgery, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ), Brazil
IIGraduate student in General Surgery, Department of Surgery of the UFRJ School of Medicine, RJ, Brazil
IIIMSc in General Surgery, UFRJ, Brazil
IVAssociate Professor, Department of Surgery of the UFRJ School of Medicine. Full Professor of General Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, PUC-Rio, RJ, Brazil

Correspondence address

 

 


ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the surgical outcomes of Heller's Cardiomyotomy with Dor fundoplication by laparoscopy (HDL) and to assess its impact on patients' quality of life and on esophageal manometry data.
METHODS: 60 patients with esophageal achalasia, operated on between 2001 and 2007, were studied retrospectively. Before surgery, the demographics and the diagnostic test results were recorded. The patients submitted a dysphagia score for quality of life before and after surgery, and lower esophageal sphincter pressure (PLES) was measured. We also studied the difference produced in quality of life
RESULTS: 37 women and 23 men were followed. Mean age was 41.08 (12–87). There was no mortality and no conversions. The mean time of diet resumption was 1.6 day. The outcome was considered excellent in 80% of the series and intermediate in 20% of the series. The mean dysphagia score before surgery was 9.03 points, and after surgery, 1.7 point (maximum of 10 points), p=0.0001. The mean score decrease between pre- and postoperative scores was 7.33 points (87.17%). The mean PLES before surgery was 32.41 mmHg, and 12.7 mmHg after.
CONCLUSION: HDL is a safe procedure and changed significantly the subjective quality of life scores, as well as the objective PLES means.

Key words: Esophageal achalasia. Quality of life. Laparoscopy. Fundoplication.


 

 

INTRODUCTION

Esophageal achalasia is an uncommon disease, with an incidence between 0.03 to 1 per 100,000 individuals1. It has no predilection for age or sex. This condition is the most frequently diagnosed esophageal motility disorder2. Depending on its etiology, it can be classified as idiopathic, chagasic, pseudoachalasia or associated with syndromic diseases. Infection by Tripanossoma cruzi in the South American countries, especially Brazil, has an important impact and we know that around 5% of the patients affected by Chagas' disease will develop achalasia3.

In esophageal achalasia, the lower esophagel sphincter (LES) is hypertensive and the propulsion of the esophagus content is impaired by aperistalsis or uncoordinated peristaltic movements. Histologically, what occurs is the destruction or a decrease in the number of ganglion cells in the myenteric plexus4-10.The affection is insidious and the main symptom is dysfagia (Df). Patients are emaciated and have poor quality of life, and leaves them unable to pursue their work activities. Treatment can be pharmacological, endoscopic or surgical. Among the surgical procedures performed, it is worth mentioning the Serra Dória and the Thal-Hatafuku techniques, which have been widely used in Brazil over the last 50 years, and esophagectomy for the very advanced cases 11-13.The surgical myotomy at the esophagogastric junction with or without an antireflux repair3,14-20 is the most relevant procedure. Over the past 15 years, it has been performed through laparoscopy and considered to be the treatment with the best long-term outcome.

The purpose of the present study was to evauate the early and late outcomes of the surgical treatment of esophagus achalasia in patients submitted to Heller esophagocardiomyotomy associated with Dor partial fundoplication (HDL), based on the results of esophageal manometry (EMN) carried out pre- and postoperatively and on the review of questionnaires and quality of life scores returned by the operated patients.

 

METHODS

The retrospective study included 60 patients with achalasia who underwent Heller esophagocardiomyotomy plus Dor partial fundoplication by laparoscopy, or Laparoscopic Heller-Dor (LHD), in the period from January 2001 through September 2007. Fifty-four of those patients came from the General Surgery outpatient clinic at the Hospital Universitário Clementino Fraga Filho (HUCFF), and six came from the Sorocaba Medical Center, Rio de Janeiro.

An evaluation protocol was used to record the following data: clinical history, specific tests, early and late pre- and postoperative assessment, quality-of-life questionnaires and a dysphagia score.

In the late postoperative period, already at the clinic, we recorded whether or not dysphagia persisted, as well as weight gain, postoperative morbidity and the need for complementary treatment. Esophageal manometry was conducted between the first and third postoperative month.

Quality of life evaluation

Two questionnaires were used to assess the patients' pre- and postoperative quality of life. The first questionnaire21,22 was applied, evaluating the association of frequency and severity of dysphagia (Df) through a scale of points (pts).

Frequency of dysphagia: 0 pts = never; 1 pt = less than 1 day per week; 2 pts = 1 day per week; 3 pts= two to three days per week; 4 pts= four to six days per week, and 5 pts= daily.

Severity of dysphagia: 0 pts= none; 1 pt= very mild; 2 pts= mild; 3 pts= moderate; 4 pts= moderately severe, and 5 pts= severe (table1).

 

 

The score added up to 10 points and was estimated before and after surgery. Questionnaires were completed through the review of the medical records and interviews with the patients at the clinic or by phone.

The second questionnaire was conducted through direct interviews with the patients, who were asked to grade, in their own words, the intensity of dysphagia relief from 0 to 100.

Indication for surgery

Surgery was indicated for patients with achalasia who presented with megaesophagus grades I, II or III, and selectively in four cases of megaesophagus grade IV (Rezende classification23). Patients who had undergone previous surgery at the esophagogastric junction were excluded from the study.

Surgical technique

Heller esophagocardiomyotomy was performed by sectioning both the longitudinal and the circular muscle layers at the esophagogastric junction 6 cm on the distal esophagus and 2 cm on the gastric cardia, leaving the organ submucosa intact (Figure 1). The procedure always ended with the addition of a Dor partial fundoplication covering the submucosa at the site of the esophagocardiomyotomy24.

 

 

 

 

Student's t-test was used in the comparison of means for quantitative variables, while the Wilcoxon rank sum test was used for medians. As for the qualitative variables, the chi-square and Fisher's exact test were applied. A value of p lower than 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.

Failure of surgical treatment

Patients who, after 90 postoperative days, presented with persistent dysphagia and a score lower or equal to five were considered to be surgical treatment failure, as were those who needed complementary treatment, such as pneumatic cardia dilation (PCD), botulinum toxin injection or a redo myotomy.

 

RESULTS

Preoperative period

Of the 60 patients, 53 had negative serology for Chagas' disease (88.6%), five (8.3%) were positive. It was not possible to identify the serological status in two (3%) cases.

Dysphagia was the prevailing symptom: it occurred in 100% of individuals with varying severity. Dysphagia for solids occurred in 96% of cases, for puréed foods in 64%, and liquids in 20% of cases. Mean duration of dysphagia was 42.6 months (4–276 months). Regurgitation occurred in 33.3% of cases.

Weight loss was reported by 78.18 % of patients, with a mean weight loss of 10.3 kg (2–30 kg). Clinical malnutrition was reported for 8.5 % of individuals. Mean albumin level was 4.08 mg/dl and total protein, 7.6 mg/dl.

A preoperative mean of 4.7 points was found for frequency of dysphagia, and the mean for severity was 4.1 points. The overall mean of scores in the preoperative period was 9.03 points (maximum of 10 points).

Twenty-one patients underwent preoperative PCD, which accounts for 35.5% of the series. The total of PCDs was 35, with a mean of 1.66 dilation/patient (1–4 sessions).

Individuals were classified as follows: grade I, 16.07% of the individuals, ; grade II: 57.1%; grade III: 21.4%, and grade IV: 3.57%. Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy showed normal esophagus mucosa in 62% of cases, esophagitis in 13.95% and peptic disease (gastric or duodenal) in 27.9 % of cases. The mean preoperative rest pressure of LES (PLES) of all the study cohort was 32.1 mmHg (4.7–60.6 mmHg).

Perioperative period

The surgical procedure was HDL in 100% of the cases. No conversions occurred . Mean operative time was 147 min (90–260 min). The mean extension of the esophagocardiomyotomy was 6 cm on the esophagus and 2 cm onto the stomach. In four patients, there occurred a punctate perforation on the distal esophagus mucosa, identified during surgery. The rhaphy of the mucosa was performed, and it was covered with gastric serosa in the Dor procedure. In 14 patients (23.3%), the short vessels between the stomach and spleen were ligated.

Postoperative period

Diet was initiated on the first postoperative day (POD) in 74% of cases. Hospital discharge took place on POD 2 for 61.8% of the patients. Mean time for diet start was 1.6 day and the mean time for postoperative discharge was 4.45 days.

Out of the 60 patients operated on, 48 were considered to be surgical treatment success, which represents 80 % of the series. Twelve patients with intermediate outcomes were classified as surgical treatment failure, which accounted for 20 % of the series.

The postoperative dysphagia score was applied, and the mean for frequency of dysphagia was 0.9 point, while the mean for severity of dysphagia was 0.8 point for an overall mean of 1.7 point. The mean overall decrease in the dysphagia score between the pre- and postoperative period was 7.33 points, which represents a 81.17% decrease. The value of p was 0.0001 (Figure 3).

 

 

The evaluation of quality of life (QL) improvement was carried out by the patients, who, in their own words, revealed a mean improvement of 84.09%. The percentage of patients who indicated an improvement >90% in QL was 76%, while 10.2 % of them showed an improvement between 80% and 90% in QL, and 10% of the cases had an improvement <80 % in QL.

Postoperative PLES assessment showed an overall mean of 12.7 mmHg. Lower esophageal sphincter pressure was found to be <15 mmHg in 55% of the patients, 15 to 20 mmHg in 42% of cases, 20 to 30 mmHg in 7.8 % of the individuals and in no instance was it > 30 mmHg (figure 4).

 

 

Mean follow-up was 15.89 months (2–60 months). Postoperative symptoms were reported by 31.5% of the patients. Among those symptoms are dysphagia, choking, regurgitation, hiccups, pyrosis and nausea. The most frequent symptom was dysphagia, present to some degree in 25% of cases. Pneumatic cardia dilation was performed in five patients postoperatively, representing 8.3% of the series. Two patients exhibited long-term morbidity – incisional hernias, representing 3.3% of cases (Table 2).

 

 

DISCUSSION

The study undertaken was retrospective with prospective data collection. The data were obtained from the review of medical records and direct interviews with the patients. Surgical outcome was excellent in 80% of the patients, and 20 % of them were classified as treatment failure. If the PLES outcome, as given by the postoperative EMN, is analyzed separately, considering that the surgical end point was the return of the PLES to a near-normal value, we find that only 7.8 % of the cases continued to present PLES above 20 mmHg. Most individuals (92.2%) exhibited a drop in PLES to near-normal values. We found studies in the literature with excellent and good outcomes between 78% and 93%21-23,25. However, we could not find in the literature a unified criterion to classify success and failure of the surgical procedure. Some authors use a decrease in PLES26 as the criterion, while others use criteria based on symtoms listed in questionnaire schemes with a scale of points21,22 similar to the one chosen for the present study. Some authors draw on reports of dysphagia relief as an improvement parameter27,28. There is yet another group who is not concerned about defining the adopted criterion precisely, and mention terms such as "relief of dysphagia" or resolution of the symptoms29. This lack of homogeneity is understood to be a consequence of the actual clinical difficulty, that is, identifying failure of treatment. This difficulty is even greater when it comes to patients who, after 90 postoperative days, still exhibit dysphagia with significant frequency and severity, but returned to their daily life and work activities and are gaining back weight. The fact is that those patients benefited from the operation, yet did not attain the ideal outcome25. On adopting this failure criterion based on a dysphagia questionnaire, the option favored an already published parameter with a higher clinical sensitivity21,22,30,31. However, this choice entailed having an increased number of cases classified as failures, which actually exhibited a partial improvement. In fact, none of the 12 patients classified as treatment failure cases required reoperation. They were managed with pneumatic dilation or a dietary change.

The criterion to indicate reoperation for the patients submitted to Heller esofagocardiomyotomy is not very clear in most studies. Few patients required reoperation in the available series; the great majority was treated by PCD or the botulinum toxin21,22,27-30,32-34.

The dysphagia score applied was based on the frequency and severity of dysphagia, measured pre- and postoperatively. We found that the great majority of patients had a high preoperative score: 84.7% of the individuals were between 8 and 10 points. Postoperatively, that tendency was reversed. The mean overall score decrease was 7.33 points, a 81.17% decrease. We can conclude that the surgical treatment, Laparoscopic Heller-Dor, was capable of influencing the quality of life in a relevant way, radically changing the chief symptom, dysphagia28,30.

In 12 patients, a decrease lower or equal to five points was observed in the dysphagia score. Those patients were counted as treatment failure cases. In that group, the mean decrease in QL was 3.08 points with a percent reduction of only 30.6 %. In the success group, the mean postoperative score was 0.6 point with a mean decrease of 8.4 points (93.3%). The relation between the mean decrease in the success/failure scores yields p<0.0001, an understandable result, since the failure group did not achieve the desired improvement in dysphagia.

Cardiomyotomy is the main operative time of HDL. We believe, as do those authors who advocate an extended myotomy on the esophagus and onto the stomach 21,22.35, this technique is essential to enhance esophageal emptying. Oelschlager 35 published a series comparing the length of cardiomyotomies and found in those with extended myotomies a mean PLES of 9.5 mmHg versus 15.8 mmHg ns with shorter myotomies, and 17 % of those individuals with short myotomies presented with dysphagia recurrence versus only 3% in the series with extended cardiomyotomy. Some authors have made use of a perioperative gastrointestinal endoscopy in order to achieve a total myotomy in the regions of the cardia, and the same objective has guided the use of perioperative esophageal manometry 27,32,36 .

The addition of an antireflux procedure, namely, the Dor fundoplication, aims to protect the esophagus from postoperative GERD. Covering the esophageal myotomy serves to protect the exposed mucosa and prevent scar fibrosis, as previously proposed by Pinotti21. The debate over whether or not to add fundoplication remains heated. Gupta34, in his series, performed esophagocardiomyotomies without fundoplication and found no statistical difference in the incidence of reflux as measured by pH monitoring, comparing pre- and postoperative results. Richards 21 conducted a prospective, randomized, double-blind trial comparing Heller esophagocardiomyotomy alone with Heller plus the Dor procedure. He found results supporting the use of HDL.

All studies reviewed which aimed to evaluate HDL and its variants concluded that it a safe procedure, requiring short hospital stay, and providing a high sucess rate, including a significant impact on the chief symptom: dysphagia. Near-zero morbidity and mortality rates also recommend this surgery in the management of achalasia 17,21,22,27,28,30,32-34,37.

Heller-Dor cardiomyotomy proved effective in changing lower esophageal sphincter pressure, reversing the preoperative pattern, and showed a positive effect on the quality of life of the patients in the present study.

 

REFERENCES

1. Boeckxstaens GE, Jonge WD, Van den Wijngaard RM, Benninga MA. Achalasia: from new insights in pathophysiology to treatment. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2005; 41 Suppl 1:S36-7         [ Links ]

2. Mayberry JF. Epidemiology and demographics of achalasia. Gastrointest Endosc Clin North Am. 2001; 11(2):235-48.         [ Links ]

3. Pilon B, Teixeira FV, Terrazas JP, Moreira EP, Pillon EY. Aspectos técnicos da esofagocardiomiotomia com divulsão para o tratamento cirúrgico do megaesôfago chagásico não avançado. Rev Ass Med Bras. 1998; 44(3):179-84.         [ Links ]

4. Csendes A, Smok G, Braghetto I, Ramirez C, Velasco N, Henriquez A. Gastroesophageal esphincter pressure and histological changes in distal esophagus in patients with achalasia of the esophagus. Dig Dis Sci. 1985; 30(10):941-5.         [ Links ]

5. Csendes A, Smok G, Braghetto I, González P, Henriquez P, Csendes P. Pizurno D. Histological studies of Auerbach's plexuses of the oesophagus, stomach, jejunum, and colon in patients with achalasia of the oesophagus: correlation with gastric acid secretion, presence of parietal cells and gastric emptying of solids. Gut. 1982; 33(2):150-4.         [ Links ]

6. Faussome-Pellegrini MS, Coirtesini C. The muscle coat of the lower esophageal sphincter in patients with achalasia and hypertensive sphincter. An electron microscopic study. J Submicrosc Cytol. 1985; 17(4):673-85.         [ Links ]

7. Goldblum JR, Rice TW, Richter JE. Histopathologic features in esophagomyotomy specimens from patients with achalasia. Gastroenterology. 1996; 111(3):648-54.         [ Links ]

8. Goldblum JR, Whyte RI, Orringer MB, Appelman HD. Achalasia: a morphological study of 42 resected specimens. Am J Surg Pathol. 1994; 18(4):327-37.         [ Links ]

9. Qualman SJ, Haupt HM, Yang P, Hamilton SR. Esophageal Lewy bodies associated with ganglion cell loss in achalasia. Gastroenterology. 1984; 87(4):848-56.         [ Links ]

10. Raymond L, Lach B, Shamji FM. Inflammatory aetiology of primary oesophageal achalasia: an immunohistochemical and ultrastructural study of Auerbach's plexus. Histopathology. 1999; 35(5):445-53.         [ Links ]

11. Ponciano H, Cecconelo I, Alves L, Ferreira BD, Gama-Rodrigues J. Cardioplasty and Roux em Y partial gastrectomy (Serra-Doria procedure) for reoperation of achalasia. Arq Gastroenterol. 2004; 41(3)155-61. Epub 2005 Jan 21.         [ Links ]

12. Martínez Ramos D, Escrig Sos J, Ángel Yepes V, Salvador Sanchis JL. Técnica de Serra-Doria. Un buen recurso para el tratamiento de la acalasia esofágica recidivada. Cir Esp. 2006; 80(5):343-4.         [ Links ]

13. Aquino JLB, Said MM, Fernandes PR. Avaliação tardia da mucosectomia esofágica com conservação da túnica muscular em pacientes com megaesôfago avançado. Rev Col Bras Cir. 2007; 34(1):9-15.         [ Links ]

14. Heller E. Extramuköse cardioplastik beim chronischen cardiospasmus mit dilatation des oesphagus. Mitt Grenzgeb Med Chir. 1913; 27:141.         [ Links ]

15. Fontaine R, Frank P. La cardio-oesophagostomie extra-muquese élargie par voie intra-thoracique et associée àla résecion de 3s splanchnique et sympathiquedorsaux gauchs dans le tratiemente du mega-oesphage. A propos de 6 cas personels. Mem Acad Chir. 1950; 76:216-23.         [ Links ]

16. Rassi L. Critério seletivo na indicação da técnica cirúrgica para o megaesôfago chagásico. Rev Goiana Med. 1979; 25(1):85-104.         [ Links ]

17. Pinotti HV. Acesso ao esôfago torácico por transecção mediana do diafragma. São Paulo: Atheneu; 1999.         [ Links ]

18. Nissen R, Rossetti M. Chirurgie de la hernie hiatale et dy syndrome de reflux: la fundoplicature et la gastropexia. J Chir. 1962; 83(3):659-71.         [ Links ]

19. Toupet A. A technique d'oesophago-gastroplastie avec phréno-gastropexie appliquée dans la cure radicale des hernies hiatales et comme complément de l'opération de Heller dans les cardiospasmes. Mem Acad Chir. 1963; 89(20):384-9.         [ Links ]

20. Pinotti HV, Ellenbogen G, Gama-Rodrigues JJ. Novas bases para o tratamento cirúrgico do megaesôfago: esofagocardiomiotomia com esofagofundogastropexia. Rev Ass Med Bras. 1974; 20(3):331-4.         [ Links ]

21. Richards WO, Torquati A, Holzman MD, Khaitan L, Byrne D,Lufti R, Sharp KW. Heller myotomy versus Heller myotomy with Dor fundoplication for achalasia: a prospective randomized double-blind clinical trial. Ann Surg. 2004; 240(3):405-12; discussion 412-5.         [ Links ]

22. Torquati A, Richards WO, Holzman MD, Sharp KW. Laparoscopic myotomy for achalasia: predictors of successful outcome after 200 cases. Ann Surg. 2006; 243(5):587-91; discussion 591-3.         [ Links ]

23. Rezende JM, Lauar KL, Olveira AR. Aspectos clínicos e radiológicos da aperistalsis do esôfago. Rev Bras Gastroenterol. 1960;12(2):247-62.         [ Links ]

24. Madureira D. Técnicas avançadas de cirurgia laparoscópica. São Paulo: Ateneu; 2001.         [ Links ]

25. Zaninotto G, Costantini M, Portale G, Battaglia G, Molena D, Carta A et al. Etiology, diagnosis, and treatment of failures after laparoscopic Heller myotomy for achalasia. Ann Surg. 2002; 235(2):186-92.         [ Links ]

26. Onopriev VI, Durleshter VM, Ryabchun VV. Comparative pre- and postoperative results analysis of functional state of the esophagus assessment in patients with various stage of achalasia. Eur J Cardiothoracic Surg. 2005; 28(1):1-6.         [ Links ]

27. Bonatti H, Hinder RA, klocker J, Neuhauser B, Klaus A, Achem SR, de Vault K. Long-term results of laparoscopic Heller myotomy with partial fundoplication for the treatment of achalasia. Am J Surg. 2005; 190(6):874-8.         [ Links ]

28. Corcione F, Cristinzio G, Cimmino V, La Manna S, Maresca M, Titolo G, Califano G. Surgical laparoscopy with intraoperative manometry in the treatment of esophageal achalasia. Surg Laparosc Endosc.1997; 7(3):232-5.         [ Links ]

29. Horgan S, Galvani C, Gorodner MV, Omelanczuck P, Elli F, Moser F, et al. Robotic assisted Heller myotomy versus laparoscopic Heller myotomy for the treatment of esophageal achalasia: multicenter study. J Gastrointest Surg. 2005; 9(8):1020-9; discussion 1029-30.         [ Links ]

30. Rossetti G, Brusciano L, Amato G, Maffettone V, Napolitano V, Russo G et al. A total fundoplication is not an obstacle to esophageal emptying after Heller myotomy for achalasia. Results of a long-term follow up. Ann Surg. 2005; 241(4):614-21.         [ Links ]

31. Arain MA, Peters JH, Tamhankar AP, Portale G, Almogy G, Demeester SR et al. Preoperative lower esophageal sphincter pressure affects outcome of laparoscopic esophageal myotomy for achalasia. J Gastrointest Surg. 2004; 8(3): 328-34.         [ Links ]

32. Smith CD, Stival A, Howell L, Swafford V. Endoscopic therapy for achalasia before Heller myotomy results in worse outcomes than myotomy alone. Ann Surg. 2006; 243(5):579-86.         [ Links ]

33. Gupta R, Sample C, Bamehriz F, Birch D, Anvari M. Long-term outcomes of laparoscopic Heller cardiomyotomy without an anti reflux procedure. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2005; 15(3):129-32.         [ Links ]

34. Oelschlager BK, Chang L, Pellegrini CA. Improved outcome after extended gastric myotomy for achalasia. Arch Surg. 2003; 138(5):490-5; discussion 495-7.         [ Links ]

35. Braghetto I, Korn O, Valladares H, Rodriguez A, Debandi A, Brunet L. Laparoscopic anterior cardiomyotomy plus anterior Dor fundoplication without division of lateral and posterior periesophageal anatomic structures for treatment of achalasia of the esophagus. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2007; 17(5):369-74.         [ Links ]

36. Dang Y, Mercer CD. Treatment of esophageal achalasia with Heller myotomy: retrospective evaluation of patient satisfaction and disease-specific quality of life. Can J Surg. 2006; 49(4):267-71.         [ Links ]

 

 

Correspondence address:
Fernando A. V. Madureira
E-mail: drfmadureira@hotmail.com

Received 22/09/2008
Accepted for publication 13/12/2008
Conflict of interest: none
Financial source: none

 

 

Study conducted at the Hospital Universitário Clementino Fraga Filho of the UFRJ; Graduate Program in General Surgery of the Department of Surgery, School of Medicine of the UFRJ.

Creative Commons License Todo o conteúdo deste periódico, exceto onde está identificado, está licenciado sob uma Licença Creative Commons