Acessibilidade / Reportar erro

Starvation and refeeding in rats: effect on some parameters of energy metabolism and electrolytes and changes of hepatic tissue

Abstract:

Regarding the importance of starvation and refeeding and the occurrence of refeeding syndrome in various conditions, the present study was conducted to investigate the effects of refeeding on some parameters of energy metabolism and electrolytes and changes of hepatic tissue in male Wistar rats. Fifty-seven rats were divided into six groups, having 6 to 11 rats. Food was provided ad-libitum until three months and then the first group was considered without starvation (day 0). Other rats were fasted for two weeks. Group 2 was applied to a group immediately after starvation (day 14). Groups 3 to 6 were refed in days 16 till 22, respectively. At the end of each period, blood and tissue samples were taken and histopathological and serum analysis, including serum electrolytes (calcium, phosphorus, sodium, potassium), the energy parameters (glucose, insulin, cortisol) and the liver enzymes (ALT, AST, ALP) were determined. Insulin decreased by starvation and then showed an increasing trend compared to starvation period, which the highest amount of this parameter was observed eight days post-refeeding. Serum glucose level showed the opposite pattern of insulin. Histopathological examination of the tissue sections revealed clear vacuoles after starvation and refeeding, in which the severity of lesions gradually decreased during refeeding. The cortisol level decreased by starvation and then increased during refeeding. Also, potassium and phosphorus concentrations declined by refeeding and the serum sodium and potassium levels were changed in the relatively opposite manner. The calcium level decreased by starvation and then increased during refeeding. These results could help recognize and remedy the refeeding syndrome.

Index Terms:
Refeeding; fasting; serum biochemical; histopathology; rat

Introduction

Starvation is a serious deficiency of energy intake for a long period (Cahill 2006Cahill G.F. Jr 2006. Fuel metabolism in starvation. Annu. Rev. Nutr. 26:1-22.). During the food restriction, the glucose level declines between 24 and 72 hours, resulting in release of glucagon (Allison 1980Allison S.P. 1980. Effect of insulin on metabolic response to injury. JPEN 4(2):175-179.). In these conditions, the body switches from carbohydrate to fat and protein usage to produce glucose and energy (McCray et al. 2004McCray S., Walker S. & Parrish C.R. 2004. Much ado about refeeding. Practical. Gastroenterology 28(12):26-44., Fuentebella & Kerner 2009Fuentebella J. & Kerner J.A. 2009. Refeeding syndrome. Pediatr. Clin. N. Am. 56:1201-1210.). Therefore, glucose is replaced with fatty acids and ketone bodies as the main energy source (Crook et al. 2001Crook M.A., Hally V. & Panteli J.V. 2001. The importance of the refeeding syndrome. Nutrition 17(7/8):632-637.).

Refeeding syndrome is a group of metabolic and biochemical changes that can occur in various conditions, especially malnourished patients undergoing artificial refeeding (Perrault et al. 1997Perrault M.M., Ostrop N.J. & Tierney M.G. 1997. Efficacy and safety ofintravenous phosphate replacement in critically ill patients. Ann. Pharmacother. 31:8-683.; Boateng et al. 2010Boateng A.A., Sriram K., Meguid M.M. & Crook M. 2010. Refeeding syndrome: treatment considerations based on collective analysis of literature case reports. Nutrition 26:156-167.). After refeeding, the body immediately shifts back to carbohydrate metabolism and the elevated blood glucose leads to increased insulin and decreased secretion of glucagon. Insulin stimulates the synthesis of protein, lipid and glycogen which requires some minerals and cofactors. Therefore, the concurrent increase of insulin secretion causes an increase in the cellular uptake of glucose and some minerals, particularly magnesium, phosphorus and potassium, resulting in electrolytes imbalance (hypomagnesaemia, hypophosphatemia and hypokalemia) (Hearing 2004Hearing S.D. 2004. Refeeding syndrome Is underdiagnosed and undertreated, but treatable. Brit. Med. J. 328(17):908-909., Fuentebella & Kerner 2009Fuentebella J. & Kerner J.A. 2009. Refeeding syndrome. Pediatr. Clin. N. Am. 56:1201-1210.). The clinical features of the refeeding syndrome take place as a consequence of the deficiency of these electrolytes and the rapid change in metabolic rate, which can put the vulnerable cases at risk of death.

In addition, carbohydrate metabolism changes greatly affect sodium and water balance and the carbohydrates of diet cause sudden decrease in renal excretion of sodium and water (Mehanna et al. 2008Mehanna H.M., Moledina J. & Travis J. 2008. Refeeding syndrome: what it is, and how to prevent and treat it. Brit. Med. J. 7659(336):1495.).

Hence, the present study was conducted to investigate the effects of refeeding on some parameters associated with energy metabolism and electrolytes and changes of hepatic tissue in male Wistar rats.

Materials and Methods

Animal ethics. This experiment was accomplished under the approval of the state committee on animal ethics, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran. Also, the recommendations of European Council Directive (86/609/EC) of November 24, 1986, regarding the standards in the protection of animals were used for experimental purposes.

Experimental Protocol. Fifty-seven male Wistar rats were housed in stainless steel cages and allowed to adapt to the conditions of the animal house for 14 days before the experiments. Animals were divided into six groups, having 6 to 11 rats. Food was provided ad-libitum containing 19% protein, 4.3% fat, 5% fiber, 4% ash and the metabolizable energy was 2.265 kcl/kg. The mean body weight of purchasing rats was 221.77±2.93 and they were weighed every 2 weeks.

After three months, the first group (G-1) was considered without starvation (day 0). Other rats were fasted for two weeks with access only to water. Group 2 (G-2) was applied to a group immediately after starvation (day 14). Groups 3 to 6 (G-3 till G-6) were refed for two, four, six and eight days (Fig.1). At the end of each period, blood and tissue samples were taken.

Fig.1:
The experimental protocol.

Histopathological evaluation. Liver tissues were collected from animals and fixed in 10% neutral buffered formalin, embedded in paraffin, sectioned at 5 μm and stained with haematoxylin and eosin (H&E) for light microscopic examination.

Serum Biochemical Analyses. Blood samples were collected from the heart of the rats into vacutainers without anticoagulant, and serum was separated by centrifugation at 750 g for 15 min and stored in a freezer at -20°C until used.

Glucose was assayed by an enzymatic (glucose oxidase) colorimetric method (ZistChem®, Tehran, Iran). Insulin was measured by rat insulin ELISA kit (Cusabio®, China, specificity 100%, and precision: intra-assay and inter-assay CV < 8% and 10%, respectively). Cortisol was assayed using EIA method (Monobind. Cortisol EIA Assay Kit, Monobind Inc., USA).

Serum sodium and potassium were measured by flame photometric method (Buck Scientific - Model PFP-7 - Industrial Flame Photometer, Iran). Serum phosphorus and calcium were measured by ammonium molybdate and bromocresolphthalein methods, respectively (Pars Azmoon kit, Pars Azmoon Co., Tehran, Iran). All biochemical parameters including AST, ALT, ALP were measured by enzymatic methods and commercial kits (Pars Azmoon Co., Tehran, Iran). All the enzyme activities were measured at 37°C and the results have been presented in units per liter (Burtis & Ashwood 1994Burtis C.A. & Ashwood E.R. 1994. Textbook of Clinical Chemistry. 2nd ed. W.B. Saunders, Philadelphia, p.735-888.). Biochemical analyses were measured using a standard autoanalyser with veterinary software (Cobas-Mira, ABX-Diagnostics, Japan).

Statistical analysis. The results were expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD). The data were analyzed statistically by one-way ANOVA with Tukey's post-hoc test, using SPSS software, version 20. P<0.05 was considered as significant. The correlation between different parameters was analyzed by correlation test.

Results

Changes in body weight

Before starvation, the mean body weight of rats was 365.04±4.14g (approximately 40% increase in three months). The minimum and maximum weight was 268 and 439g, respectively. After 2 weeks fasting, the mean body weight of rats decreased to 263.52±1.03 (about 28% decline in 2 weeks). A significant difference was observed among the rats of groups 2 to 6 except G-5 and G-6 groups. The information related to body weight of rats and its increasing trend after refeeding is shown in Figure 2.

Fig.2:
The body weight of rats showed an increasing trend during refeeding.

Histopathological evaluation

No lesions were observed in the tissue sections from the rats of G-1 group (without starvation), while the rats of G-2 group (after starvation) showed mild to moderate, clear vacuoles (Fig.3A).

Fig.3:
Rat livers of various groups. Clear vacuoles were observed in tissue sections, in which the severity of the lesion gradually decreased during refeeding. (A) At starvation; (B) 2 days post-refeeding; (C) 4 days post-refeeding; (D) 8 days post-refeeding. Hematoxilin-eosin, 180x.

The tissue sections of the G-3 group (2 days post-refeeding) revealed many clear vacuoles with different sizes in hepatocytes, representing stored lipid droplets (Fig.3B). In the rats of other refeeding groups (4, 6 and 8 days post-refeeding), tissue changes were accompanied by formation of mild, clear vacuoles in hepatocytes (Fig.3C,D), in which the severity of the lesion decreased by increasing the refeeding days.

Serum biochemical analyses

The mean ± SD of parameters values, including glucose, insulin, cortisol, Na+, K+, P, Ca2+, AST, ALT and ALP are presented in Table 1. Also, the correlation between glucose, insulin and electrolytes is presented in Table 2.

Table 1:
The mean ± SD of parameters value of rats by starvation and refeeding
Table 2:
The correlation between glucose, insulin and electrolytes

The glucose concentration in the G-6 group had significant difference with the rats of G-2, G-4 and G-5 groups. In addition, a significant difference was observed between the rats of G-5 and G-1 groups. In all groups except G-3 group, insulin level had significant difference with the rats of G-1 group. The highest and lowest amounts of insulin were seen in the rats of G-6 and G-5 groups, respectively, which showed a significant difference with each other and also with others. Evaluation of cortisol level among different groups presented significant difference between the rats of G-2 and G-6 groups. There was no significant difference among other groups.

The amount of Na+ in the rats of G-3 group showed a significant difference with G-1 and G-6 groups. This parameter increased during refeeding, but no significant difference was seen among the various refed groups. The Ca2+ level in the rats of G-6 group had significant difference with the rats of G-1, G- 2 and G-5 groups. There was no significant difference among other groups. By refeeding, the phosphorus concentration decreased, which in the rats of G-6 group had statistically significant difference with all groups except G-3 group. Also, the K+ concentration decreased by refeeding, which in the rats of G-6 group presented significant difference with all groups except G-4 group.

There was no significant difference in AST level in the sera of the rats. The ALT concentration in the G-6 group had statistically significant difference with the rats of G-1 and G-2 groups. Although this parameter increased during refeeding, no significant difference was seen among these groups. ALP concentration presented significant difference between the rats of G-1 group and refed rats (groups G-3 to G-6). The ALP level increased during refeeding; however, there was no significant difference among these groups.

Discussion

Approximately 40% increase of mean body weight in three months and 28% decrease in 2 weeks fasting followed by a 23% increase in 8 days refeeding led to severe changes in different parameters.

In early starvation, blood glucose levels decline, resulting in a decrease in insulin and an increase in glucagon levels. Accordingly, the body switches the main energy course from carbohydrate to protein and fat (McCray et al. 2005McCray S., Walker S. & Parrish C.R. 2005. Much ado about refeeding. Practical. Gastroenterology. 29(1):26-44.). After refeeding, the absorbed glucose leads to increased blood glucose levels, which increase insulin secretion and this induces lowered serum glucose concentration. After a period of starvation, when the source of glucose is available during refeeding, insulin as an anabolic hormone can suppress gluconeogenesis and activate lipogenesis. Also, it has been reported that insulin promoted the storage and synthesis of lipids, protein, and carbohydrate through the body (Saltiel & Kahn 2001Saltiel A.R. & Kahn C.R. 2001. Insulin signalling and the regulation of glucose and lipid metabolism. Nature 414:799-806.).

In the present study, insulin level decreased after two weeks starvation and subsequently presented an increasing trend in comparison with starvation period; the highest amount of this parameter was observed eight days post-refeeding. Due to insulin action, serum glucose level showed the opposite pattern of insulin, the increased insulin level of which during refeeding can explain the slight decrease of glucose in the rats.

Previous studies have reported that fasting and impaired glucose regulation can increase hepatic content of triacylglycerol and eventually result in the accumulation of lipid in the liver parenchyma (Lonardo et al. 2015Lonardo A., Ballestri S. & Marchesini G. 2015. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: A precursor of the metabolic syndrome. Digest. Liver Dis. 47(3): 181-190., Marks et al. 2015Marks K.A., Marvyn P.M. & Aristizabal Henao J.J. 2015. Fasting enriches liver triacylglycerol with n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids: implications for understanding the adipose-liver axis in serum docosahexaenoic acid regulation. Genes Nutr. 10(6):1-14.). In the present experiment, tissue sections of rats revealed clear vacuoles, representing stored lipid droplets by starvation and also during refeeding. The severity of lesion gradually decreased by refeeding, which can result from removal of the exact cause (starvation) and the regeneration ability of the liver.

The cortisol level decreased after two weeks starvation and then increased during refeeding. In addition, it has been reported that fasting caused decreased cortisol level which increased significantly after refeeding (Jiménez & Morales 2007Jiménez A.P. & Morales A.E. 2007. Metabolic responses to short starvation and refeeding in Dicentrarchuslabrax Effect of dietary composition. Aquaculture 265:325-335., Wassif et al. 2011Wassif W.S., McLoughlin DM. & Vincent R.P. 2011. Steroid metabolism and excretion in severe anorexia nervosa: effects of refeeding. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 93(5):911-917.).

As fasting continues the body attempts to conserve muscle and protein and various tissues such as muscles reduce the use of ketone bodies and their level increases. Therefore, this event stimulates the brain to use ketone bodies as its energy source instead of glucose and the liver decreases the rate of gluconeogenesis. Furthermore, severe depletion of several intracellular minerals occurs, but their serum concentrations may remain normal (Mehanna et al. 2009Mehanna H.M., Nankivell P.C., Moledina J. & Travis J. 2009. Refeeding syndrome-awareness, prevention and management. Head Neck 1:4.). It has been established that insulin stimulates the absorption of some minerals such as potassium, magnesium and phosphate and also releases the sodium in potassium exchange (Mehanna et al. 2009Mehanna H.M., Nankivell P.C., Moledina J. & Travis J. 2009. Refeeding syndrome-awareness, prevention and management. Head Neck 1:4.). The extent of these changes can be related to the time of fasting and period of refeeding and ranged from no serum mineral changes to slight increase or decline in their serum levels.

Potassium is involved in glucose metabolism and potassium depletion caused by low potassium diet impairs insulin secretion, which in turn leads to glucose intolerance (Obeid et al. 2014Obeid O.A., Hachem D.H. & Ayoub J.J. 2014. Refeeding and metabolic syndromes: two sides of the same coin. Nutr. Diabetes 120:1-8.). Higher intake of potassium via diet is related to decreased risk of insulin resistance and metabolic syndrome (Lee et al. 2013Lee H., Lee J., Hwang S., Kim S., Chin H.J. & Han J.S. 2013. Potassium intake and the prevalence of metabolic syndrome: the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examintaion Survey2008-2010. PloS One 8:1-9.). During starvation, intracellular potassium is depleted, while its serum concentration may remain normal. Upon refeeding, potassium enters into cells because of insulin secretion and consequently the serum concentration of this mineral reduces (Mehanna 2008Mehanna H.M., Moledina J. & Travis J. 2008. Refeeding syndrome: what it is, and how to prevent and treat it. Brit. Med. J. 7659(336):1495., Obeid et al. 2014Obeid O.A., Hachem D.H. & Ayoub J.J. 2014. Refeeding and metabolic syndromes: two sides of the same coin. Nutr. Diabetes 120:1-8.). In the present study, the potassium level also decreased during refeeding and the serum sodium and potassium levels changed in a relatively opposite manner, which can be associated with Na-K ATPase symporter action.

Phosphorus is a vital mineral that is involved in various metabolic processes, especially that of glucose and energy (Haap et al. 2006Haap M., Heller E., Thamer C., Tschritter O., Stefan N. & Fritsche A. 2006. Association of serum phosphate levels with glucose tolerance, insulin sensitivity and insulin secretion in non-diabetic subjects. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 60:734-739., Lippi et al. 2009Lippi G., Montagnana M., Salvagno G.L., Targher G. & Guidi G.C. 2009. Relationship between serum phosphate and cardiovascular risk factors in a large cohort of adult outpatients. Diabetes. Res. Clin. Pract. 84:3-5.). Following feeding, low serum phosphate concentration is related to increased blood glucose level and decreased insulin sensitivity (Friedman 2007Friedman M.I. 2007. Obesity and the hepatic control of feeding behavior. Drug News. Perspect. 20:9.). Decline in the serum phosphate concentration can take place as a result of insulin secretion (Obeid et al. 2014Obeid O.A., Hachem D.H. & Ayoub J.J. 2014. Refeeding and metabolic syndromes: two sides of the same coin. Nutr. Diabetes 120:1-8.). In refeeding syndrome, total body phosphate depletion occurs. In addition, the insulin surge results in a markedly increased uptake and use of phosphate in the cells, inducing a deficiency in intracellular and extracellular phosphorus. In this situation, even slight decline in serum phosphorus may cause wide dysfunction of the cellular processes (Mehanna et al. 2008Mehanna H.M., Moledina J. & Travis J. 2008. Refeeding syndrome: what it is, and how to prevent and treat it. Brit. Med. J. 7659(336):1495.). In this study, the phosphorus concentration also decreased in the rats of refeeding groups. In addition, the calcium level reduced by starvation and then elevated in the refed rats.

Conclusions

The present study showed that the refeeding causes effects on hepatic tissue, in some parameters associated with energy metabolism and in serum electrolytes.

Disorders caused by refeeding syndrome, especially electrolytes and fluid changes, can disrupt many body activities.

It is likely that the more significant differences are observed by increased refeeding period.

Obtaining information from mentioning parameter status could help recognize and remedy the refeeding syndrome.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the Research Council of Shiraz University and School of Veterinary Medicine, Shiraz University for financial and technical support of this study (Grant No. 71-GR-VT-5).

References

  • Allison S.P. 1980. Effect of insulin on metabolic response to injury. JPEN 4(2):175-179.
  • Boateng A.A., Sriram K., Meguid M.M. & Crook M. 2010. Refeeding syndrome: treatment considerations based on collective analysis of literature case reports. Nutrition 26:156-167.
  • Burtis C.A. & Ashwood E.R. 1994. Textbook of Clinical Chemistry. 2nd ed. W.B. Saunders, Philadelphia, p.735-888.
  • Cahill G.F. Jr 2006. Fuel metabolism in starvation. Annu. Rev. Nutr. 26:1-22.
  • Crook M.A., Hally V. & Panteli J.V. 2001. The importance of the refeeding syndrome. Nutrition 17(7/8):632-637.
  • Friedman M.I. 2007. Obesity and the hepatic control of feeding behavior. Drug News. Perspect. 20:9.
  • Fuentebella J. & Kerner J.A. 2009. Refeeding syndrome. Pediatr. Clin. N. Am. 56:1201-1210.
  • Haap M., Heller E., Thamer C., Tschritter O., Stefan N. & Fritsche A. 2006. Association of serum phosphate levels with glucose tolerance, insulin sensitivity and insulin secretion in non-diabetic subjects. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 60:734-739.
  • Hearing S.D. 2004. Refeeding syndrome Is underdiagnosed and undertreated, but treatable. Brit. Med. J. 328(17):908-909.
  • Jiménez A.P. & Morales A.E. 2007. Metabolic responses to short starvation and refeeding in Dicentrarchuslabrax Effect of dietary composition. Aquaculture 265:325-335.
  • Lee H., Lee J., Hwang S., Kim S., Chin H.J. & Han J.S. 2013. Potassium intake and the prevalence of metabolic syndrome: the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examintaion Survey2008-2010. PloS One 8:1-9.
  • Lippi G., Montagnana M., Salvagno G.L., Targher G. & Guidi G.C. 2009. Relationship between serum phosphate and cardiovascular risk factors in a large cohort of adult outpatients. Diabetes. Res. Clin. Pract. 84:3-5.
  • Lonardo A., Ballestri S. & Marchesini G. 2015. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: A precursor of the metabolic syndrome. Digest. Liver Dis. 47(3): 181-190.
  • Marks K.A., Marvyn P.M. & Aristizabal Henao J.J. 2015. Fasting enriches liver triacylglycerol with n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids: implications for understanding the adipose-liver axis in serum docosahexaenoic acid regulation. Genes Nutr. 10(6):1-14.
  • McCray S., Walker S. & Parrish C.R. 2004. Much ado about refeeding. Practical. Gastroenterology 28(12):26-44.
  • McCray S., Walker S. & Parrish C.R. 2005. Much ado about refeeding. Practical. Gastroenterology. 29(1):26-44.
  • Mehanna H.M., Nankivell P.C., Moledina J. & Travis J. 2009. Refeeding syndrome-awareness, prevention and management. Head Neck 1:4.
  • Mehanna H.M., Moledina J. & Travis J. 2008. Refeeding syndrome: what it is, and how to prevent and treat it. Brit. Med. J. 7659(336):1495.
  • Obeid O.A., Hachem D.H. & Ayoub J.J. 2014. Refeeding and metabolic syndromes: two sides of the same coin. Nutr. Diabetes 120:1-8.
  • Perrault M.M., Ostrop N.J. & Tierney M.G. 1997. Efficacy and safety ofintravenous phosphate replacement in critically ill patients. Ann. Pharmacother. 31:8-683.
  • Saltiel A.R. & Kahn C.R. 2001. Insulin signalling and the regulation of glucose and lipid metabolism. Nature 414:799-806.
  • Wassif W.S., McLoughlin DM. & Vincent R.P. 2011. Steroid metabolism and excretion in severe anorexia nervosa: effects of refeeding. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 93(5):911-917.

Publication Dates

  • Publication in this collection
    June 2016

History

  • Received
    25 Jan 2016
  • Accepted
    13 Apr 2016
Colégio Brasileiro de Patologia Animal - CBPA Pesquisa Veterinária Brasileira, Caixa Postal 74.591, 23890-000 Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil, Tel./Fax: (55 21) 2682-1081 - Rio de Janeiro - RJ - Brazil
E-mail: pvb@pvb.com.br