Services on Demand
- Cited by SciELO
- Access statistics
Print version ISSN 0100-8455
Braz. J. Genet. vol. 20 no. 4 Ribeirão Preto Dec. 1997
Reproductive isolation between Anastrepha bistrigata and A. striata (Diptera, Tephritidae)
Denise Selivon and João S. Morgante
Departamento de Biologia, Instituto de Biociências, Universidade de São Paulo, Caixa Postal 11461, 05422-970 São Paulo, SP, Brasil. Send correspondence to J.S.M.
The reproductive isolation between two closely related species, Anastrepha bistrigata and A. striata, was studied in the laboratory. Interespecific copulation attempts were observed, but examination of the spermathecae showed that sperm transference did not occur, even after a prolonged period of contact between the mating pairs. These results indicate prezygotic isolation. The analysis of the hourly distribution of mating activities under laboratory conditions, here described for the first time for A. bistrigata, clearly showed differences for the two species, the activities being concentrated in the afternoon period for A. striata and in the morning for A. bistrigata
Many species of flies belonging to the Tephritidae are considered fruit pests since their larval development occurs in fruit pulp. The genus Anastrepha is endemic of neotropical regions, and up to the moment comprises 183 described species (Aluja, 1994), 80 of which occur in Brazil (Zucchi, 1988). Because of their economic importance, there is wide interest in these flies and, in fact, a great number of studies on their biology have been performed. However, there have been few studies on the reproductive isolation.
A. bistrigata and A. striata are two closely related species belonging to the taxonomic group "striata" (Norrbom and Kim, 1988). They have similar karyotypes (Solferini and Morgante, 1987), but there are substantial genetic differences (Morgante et al., 1980). However, no information about reproductive isolation between them is available. Also, daily mating activities are only known for A. striata under fieldcage conditions (Aluja, 1993).
MATERIAL AND METHODS
The colony of A. bistrigata was established from infested guavas (Psidium guajava, Myrtaceae) collected in Jundiaí, in the State of São Paulo, in 1990 and A. striata from guavas collected in Belém, in the State of Pará, in 1989. The flies were maintained in population cages (30 x 30 x 60 cm) under a natural photoperiod, at a temperature of 25 ± 3oC and 60 ± 10% relative humidity. They were fed with water and a 3:1 mixture of sugar and corn protein hydrolysate. Guavas were furnished as a substrate for oviposition and larval development.
Virgin individuals 2030 days old were used for the experimental assay of reproductive isolation between A. bistrigata and A. striata. Four population cages consisting of six mating pairs each were made, two containing the intraspecific crosses and the other two composed of interspecific pairs (one cage with bistrigata females x striata males, and one cage with bistrigata males x striata females).
Observations of adult behavior were made during two consecutive days between 9:00 and 18:00 h, the number of copulations being noted. After the period of observation the flies were taken from the cages and dissected. The testes and the spermathecae were individually transferred to a drop of Ringer solution on a microscope slide, burst and covered with a coverslip. The preparations were examined for the presence of spermatozoa.
In another test, the crosses were made in the same manner described above. However, the mating pairs were maintained in the cages for 20 days. During this period, the guavas were furnished for oviposition, were replaced every five days, and transferred to cages with a layer of vermiculite, where the larvae fall to pupate. After 20 days, the vermiculite was examined for the presence of pupae.
For the study of the diel pattern of mating activities of A. bistrigata and A. striata, five males and five virgin females (20 days old) were placed in a population cage and observed during one day. Five such cages were made for each species, using different flies in each one. Observations were done from 6:00 to 19:00 h. The number of mating attempts and the time they occurred were registered.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
In the control crosses seven copulations of A. bistrigata and 12 of A. striata were observed. Some attempted copulations in the crosses between A. striata and A. bistrigata were observed, most of them between bistrigata males and striata females (N = 13), while in the reciprocal cross just four attempted copulations occurred. Examination of the testes showed that all males involved in the crosses presented mature spermatozoa. As expected, sperm was present in the spermathecae of females of the intraspecific crosses. However, no spermatozoa were detected in the spermathecae of females from the interspecific crosses. The absence of spermatozoa indicates prezygotic isolation.
In the second experiment, even though the A. bistrigata and A. striata pairs remained together for 20 days, thus favoring the occurrence of copulations, pupae were not obtained, indicating that matings did not occur, or if they did, no viable hybrids were produced. The first possibility is more probable, since transference of spermatozoa was not verified in the first experiment. In the control crosses ordinary production of pupae was observed, wherein 86 pupae of A. striata and 56 of A. bistrigata were obtained.
The hourly distribution of mating activities of the two species showed bellshaped patterns, however, peak activities were clearly separated (Figure 1). According to Aluja (1993), the period of mating of A. striata in fieldcage conditions is between 10:00 and 17:00 h, with a peak at 15:0016:00 h. The present data, obtained under laboratory conditions, showed essentially the same pattern, mating activities occurring from 10:00 to 19:00 h, with a peak between 15:00 and 17:00 h (Figure 1), the only difference being an extension (up to 17:00 h) of the periods of mating activities. This difference may be due to the different conditions in which the experiments were conducted rather than to a difference between the strains. Regardless of these differences, the results showed that the main peak of mating activity of A. striata is after 12:00 h. On the other hand, the mating activity of A. bistrigata occurred mainly in the morning (Figure 1). Matings occurred between 8:00 and 18:00 h, but were most frequent from 9:00 to 10:00 h.
A. striata and A. bistrigata also have different mating behaviors (Morgante et al.,1993). The mating behavior of A. striata is more complex, with a courtship composed of several events while A. bistrigata has a more simple mating behavior, which usually occurs on the host fruit. Copulation is forced by the males, even during oviposition. There is no courtship and recognition of the partners seems not to be necessary, until physical contact is established. This behavior may explain the large number of copulation attempts in the interspecific crosses of bistrigata males with striata females. The bistrigata males attempt to copulate regardless of the type of female.
The reproductive isolation between these two species, characterized in the present study by the absence of progenies in the interspecific crosses, can be explained by differences in mating behavior and in timing of mating activities.
Research supported by CNPq and FINEP. Publication supported by FAPESP.
Existem poucos estudos envolvendo testes de isolamento reprodutivo entre espécies do gênero Anastrepha. Neste trabalho apresentamos os resultados de testes feitos em laboratório com duas espécies relacionadas, A. striata e A. bistrigata. Nos cruzamentos interespecíficos foram observadas tentativas de cópula, mas o exame das espermatecas mostrou que não houve transferência de espermatozóides. Não ocorreram cruzamentos mesmo quando o período de contato entre as duas espécies foi prolongado. Os resultados sugerem a existência de isolamento prézigótico entre as espécies. A análise do padrão de atividade de cópula ao longo do dia, em condições de laboratório, pela primeira vez descrito para A. bistrigata, mostrou a existência de diferenças acentuadas, sendo que em A. striata as atividades estão concentradas no período da tarde, enquanto que, em A. bistrigata, no período da manhã. O isolamento reprodutivo entre estas duas espécies, aqui caracterizado, pode ser explicado pelas diferenças no comportamento e nos períodos de atividade de cópula.
Aluja, M. (1993). Basic patterns of behavior in wild Anastrepha striata (Diptera: Tephritidae) flies under fieldcage conditions. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 86: 776793. [ Links ]
Aluja, M. (1994). Bionomics and management of Anastrepha. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 39: 155178. [ Links ]
Morgante, J.S., Malavasi, A. and Bush, G.L. (1980). Biochemical systematics and evolutionary relationships of neotropical Anastrepha. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 73: 622630. [ Links ]
Morgante, J.S., Selivon, D., Solferini, V.N. and Matioli, S.R. (1993). Evolutionary patterns in specialist and generalist species of Anastrepha. In: Fruit Flies: Biology and Management (Aluja, M. and Liedo, P., eds.). Springer-Verlag, New York, pp. 1520. [ Links ]
Norrbom, A.L. and Kim, L.C. (1988). A list of the reported host plants of the species of Anastrepha (Diptera: Tephritidae). US Department of Agriculture, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, Plant Protection and Quarantine, Hyattsville, MD, pp. 114. [ Links ]
Solferini, V.N. and Morgante, J.S. (1987). Karyotype study of eight species of Anastrepha (Diptera: Tephritidae). Caryologia 40: 229241. [ Links ]
Zucchi, R.A. (1988). Moscasdasfrutas (Diptera: Tephritidae) no Brasil: Taxonomia, distribuição geográfica e hospedeiros. In: Moscasdasfrutas no Brasil (Souza, H.M.L., eds.). Anais Fundação Cargil, Campinas, pp. 110. [ Links ]
(Received April 25, 1997)
Figure 1- Frequency distributions of mating activities of Anastrepha bistrigata and A. striata adults during the day.