Utilization of microsatellites for the analysis of genomic alterations in colorectal cancers in Brazil

Braz J Med Biol Res, August 1997, Volume 30(8) 915-921

¹Departamento de Bioquímica, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, 30161-970 Belo Horizonte, MG, Brasil

Departamentos de ²Cirurgia and ³Anatomia Patológica, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, 30130-100 Belo Horizonte, MG, Brasil

⁴Núcleo de Genética Médica de Minas Gerais (GENE), 30130-909 Belo Horizonte, MG, Brasil

References

^{Correspondence and Footnotes}

Two different pathogenetic mechanisms are proposed for colorectal cancers. One, the so-called "classic pathway", is the most common and depends on multiple additive mutational events (germline and/or somatic) in tumor suppressor genes and oncogenes, frequently involving chromosomal deletions in key genomic regions. Methodologically this pathway is recognizable by the phenomenon of loss of heterozygosity. On the other hand, the "mutator pathway" depends on early mutational loss of the mismatch repair system (germline and/or somatic) leading to accelerated accumulation of gene mutations in critical target genes and progression to malignancy. Methodologically this second pathway is recognizable by the phenomenon of microsatellite instability. The distinction between these pathways seems to be more than academic since there is evidence that the tumors emerging from the mutator pathway have a better prognosis. We report here a very simple methodology based on a set of tri-, tetra- and pentanucleotide repeat microsatellites allowing the simultaneous study of microsatellite instability and loss of heterozygosity which could allocate 70% of the colorectal tumors to the classic or the mutator pathway. The ease of execution of the methodology makes it suitable for routine clinical typing.

Key words: polymerase chain reaction, colorectal carcinoma, microsatellite, p53, DCC, microsatellite instability

Abstract

Introduction

The characterization of chromosomal and molecular alterations in many types of neoplasias has led to the current paradigm that cancer is a genomic disease (1). In colorectal carcinomas, which are among the most prevalent human cancers worldwide (2), a series of studies have established that additive mutations in c-Ki-ras, an oncogene, together with the inactivation of the tumor suppressor genes p53 (located on chromosome 17p), DCC (deleted in colon cancer, located on chromosome 18q) and APC (adenomatous polyposis coli, located on chromosome 5q), occur in most patients and are implicated in the stepwise transformation of the normal mucosa into a malignant tumor (3). Inherited germline mutations in APC (present on chromosome 5q21) preclude one of the necessary mutational steps and thus are associated with a strong familial predisposition to colorectal cancer (4). It is important to note that, while mutations in oncogenes are generally single dominant events, the inactivation of tumor suppressors is dependent on the functional loss of both copies of the relevant genes. While the first of the two losses occurs most frequently by gene mutations, the second one is more often a chromosomal event, generally a deletion (5-7). Since the deletion generally involves simultaneous loss of genetic loci near the tumor suppressor - and occasionally loss of the whole chromosome or chromosome arm - these events are strongly associated with loss of heterozygosity (LOH) of hypervariable polymorphisms (minisatellites and microsatellites) located in the deleted region.

Recently, studies of an autosomal dominant form of colorectal cancer known as "hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer" (HNPCC) have shown that this tumor is caused by germline mutations in human DNA repair genes, principally hMSH and hMLH1 but also hPMS1 and hPMSH2 (reviewed in Refs. 8-10). Mutations in these genes lead to a defect in the correction of mismatches occurring during DNA replication, with the subsequent accumulation of mutations throughout the genome, including tumor suppressor genes and oncogenes, which can cause malignant transformation (9,11). Mismatch repair defects occur also in a substantial proportion (15-25%) of sporadic colorectal cancers (9).

Microsatellites are genomic sequences consisting of 2-6-bp motifs repeated in multiple tandem copies (reviewed in Ref. 12). Because of their repetitive nature, these sequences are prone to frequent changes in the repeat number by replication slippage (13). Since these mutations are almost always corrected by the DNA repair system, microsatellites, although polymorphic in populations, are somatically stable. In the case of tumors with defects in mismatch repair, however, new mutant alleles are frequently observed in microsatellites, a phenomenon termed "microsatellite instability" or "replication error phenomenon (RER)" (8). It is questionable if microsatellite instability has any direct relationship with carcinogenesis, but at any rate it serves as a marker for the presence of mismatch repair deficiency in the tumors (8,9).

In summary, two different pathways of colorectal carcinogenesis can be recognized. One, called the "classic pathway", is the most common and depends on multiple additive mutational events (germline and/or somatic) in tumor suppressor genes and oncogenes, frequently involving chromosomal deletions in key genomic regions (3,7). Methodologically this pathway is recognizable by the LOH phenomenon. On the other hand, the "mutator pathway" depends on early mutational loss of the mismatch repair system (germline and/or somatic) leading to accelerated accumulation of gene mutations in critical target genes and progression to malignancy (8-10). Methodologically this second pathway is recognizable by the phenomenon of microsatellite instability. The distinction between these pathways seems to be more than academic. There is mounting and convincing evidence that the tumors emerging from the mutator pathway have lower proliferative activity and overall better prognosis than those emerging from the classical pathway (14-16). Thus, laboratory analysis of colorectal tumors aimed at establishing the pathogenetic pathway may soon be incorporated into medical practice. Therefore, it will be necessary to develop simple methods applicable to the routine clinical laboratory.

In practice, microsatellites are typed by the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using primers designed from the DNA sequence flanking the tandem repeat arrays. Most studies of microsatellite instability have been based on the study of (CA)_n repeats, which are abundant and sensitive, but cumbersome to type because alleles can only be easily resolved on sequencing gels and generally require isotopic labeling for visualization of the PCR products. In contrast, as we have shown elsewhere, microsatellites with repeats of more than 3 bp can be much more simply typed in short non-denaturing gels with non-isotopic silver staining (17-19). We report here a very simple methodology based on a set of tri-, tetra- and pentanucleotide repeat microsatellites which allows the simultaneous study of microsatellite instability and loss of heterozygosity and thus helps to allocate a given colorectal tumor to the classic or mutator pathway. The ease of execution of the methodology makes it suitable for routine clinical typing. Moreover, the present study provides the first evaluation of the relative importance of the two pathways in the pathogenesis of colorectal carcinoma in Brazil.

Material and Methods

Patients

A sequential sample of 20 colorectal adenocarcinomas was obtained at the Hospital das Clínicas, Federal University of Minas Gerais, and the Colo-Proctology Service of the Santa Casa de Misericórdia, Belo Horizonte, Brazil. There was no selection on the basis of age, location of the tumor, histopathological classification or family history. However, all tumors were subsequently found to be isolated cases in the family. All 20 samples consisted of paired fragments of normal colonic mucosa and tumoral tissue from the same patient and were subjected to microscopic analysis prior to DNA extraction to ensure the absence of neoplastic infiltration in the mucosa and the predominance (>80%) of neoplastic cells in the tumor samples. DNA was extracted from the tumor samples by an alkaline extraction procedure (20). To establish a population baseline, all tri-, tetra- and pentanucleotide loci were studied in DNA extracted from the blood of at least 100 unrelated individuals randomly chosen among those presenting for paternity tests at the Núcleo de Genética Médica de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte.

Microsatellite analysis

We used microsatellites to detect loss of heterozygosity in the p53, DCC and APC loci. For p53 we used the pentanucleotide repeat p53ALU (21,22) (AAAAT repeats) which is located in the first intron of the p53 gene; for DCC we used the closely linked tetranucleotide repeat D18S51 (AAAG repeats; 23) and for APC we used the linked CA-repeat microsatellite D5S299 (24). For the detection of microsatellite instability we utilized the previous three microsatellites plus the trinucleotide repeats D13S308E (17) and D2S196E (19) (containing CAT and ACA repeats, respectively) and the tetranucleotide repeat D12S67 (25) containing GATA repeats. PCR reactions were carried out in 20-µl volumes with 10-100 ng of genomic DNA as a template. The primers used are listed in Table 1. For resolution of the alleles of the D5S299 CA-repeat locus, the products were denatured and resolved on a sequencing gel (50 cm x 30 cm x 0.1 cm); after electrophoresis, a strip of the area expected to contain the products was cut and stained with silver salts for visualization (18). For the tri-, tetra- and pentanucleotide microsatellites, non-denaturing electrophoresis was performed on short gels (17 cm x 10 cm x 0.15 cm) followed by silver staining (18).

Results

Loss of heterozygosity

LOH was considered to have occurred when the tumor sample exhibited complete or almost total absence of one of the alleles present in the normal mucosa (Figure 1A). Obviously, homozygous patients could not be informative for LOH. For this reason, we established the level of heterozygosity of p53ALU and D18S51 in the Brazilian population. The location of the pentanucleotide repeat polymorphism p53ALU in the first intron of the p53 gene (21,22) is ideal for studies of loss of heterozygosity. We typed this polymorphism in 100 randomly chosen individuals (Table 1) and found that 65 of them were heterozygous. This means that in 35% of cases the polymorphism will unfortunately not be informative. However, it still appears to be the best microsatellite marker for this purpose. In contrast, D18S51, which is not located as ideally but still closely linked to the DCC gene (23), exhibited a much higher heterozygosity of 89% among 311 individuals. The D5S299 polymorphism is closely linked to the APC gene and has an expected heterozygosity of 0.70 in Europeans (24). This polymorphism has the disadvantage of being a dinucleotide repeat and of needing more complex techniques for allele resolution.

Searching for LOH in our series of 20 tumors (Table 2) we found that six samples (30%) were non-informative (homozygous) for p53ALU; in the 14 heterozygous samples LOH was observed in eight cases (57%). Loss of heterozygosity in DCC was analyzed using microsatellite D18S51, which is located on 18q21.3, in the proximity of the DCC gene on 18q21.1. At this locus, four samples were non-informative (20%) and in the 16 heterozygous samples LOH was observed in six cases (37.5%). For D5S299 17 patients were informative, but LOH was not observed in any of them.

Figure 1
- Examples of the detection with microsatellites of loss of heterozygosity and microsatellite instability in colorectal carcinomas. A, Silver-stained polyacrylamide gel containing D18S51 alleles amplified from the normal mucosa (N) and tumor (T) of four patients (identified by numbers) with colorectal adenocarcinoma. The tumor from patient 2 presents loss of heterozygosity (arrowhead). Patient 6 is homozygous and consequently is not informative. B, Silver-stained polyacrylamide gel containing D12S67 alleles amplified from the normal mucosa (N) and tumor (T) of four patients (identified by numbers) with colorectal adenocarcinoma. The tumors from patients 11, 16 and 18 present microsatellite instability identified by the appearance of new mutant alleles (arrowheads).

Microsatellite instability

All 20 adenocarcinomas were successfully amplified using the six microsatellites (Table 2). The presence of extra bands in the amplification of tumoral DNA that were not present in the amplification of DNA from the normal mucosa defined microsatellite instability (Figure 1B) and was observed in five tumors. This frequency of 25% agrees well with those reported in previous studies, which range from 15% to 28% for sporadic colorectal tumors (8,9). Two of these five samples showed instability in two microsatellites, one in three loci and the remaining two samples in four distinct loci.

Pathogenetic classification of colorectal tumors

Of the 20 tumors studied, 14 (70%) could be assigned to the classic or mutator pathway of carcinogenesis (Table 2). Nine cases (45%) showed LOH at p53ALU and/or D18S51 and absence of microsatellite instability and could thus be assigned to the classic pathway. Five cases (25%) showed microsatellite instability and absence of LOH and could thus be allocated to the mutator pathway (including one case that presented both replication errors in two microsatellites and LOH in D18S51; see below). Six tumors could not be classified because they showed neither LOH nor microsatellite instability.

In the present study we were able to assign 70% of the colorectal tumors to the classic or the mutator pathway (9). There are both theoretical and methodological reasons why it was not possible to establish the pathogenetic pathway of all colorectal tumors. First, in addition to the established so-called classic and mutator pathways, there may exist (and probably do exist) as yet unknown other route(s). Another reason for uncertainty is that microsatellite instability may be present in the tumor but may not be detected (10).

Discussion

The fact that LOH is thought to indicate the classic pathway of tumorigenesis depends on probabilistic considerations. In normal states the chromosomal mutation rate is higher than the genic one. Thus, we expect to see frequent chromosomal deletions in tumors with an intact repair system undergoing the classic pathway of tumorigenesis. In the mutator pathway, gene mutation rates are elevated by hundred- or thousand-fold and thus much more likely to occur than the chromosomal accidents that lead to LOH. These predictions were largely observed experimentally (11). However, there is no compelling reason why LOH may not occur in tumors with microsatellite instability (11), as shown by the one instance of a tumor with both microsatellite instability and LOH at D18S51 in the present study.

It is significant that we could assign 14 of the 20 tumors with only six microsatellites, five of which are tri-, tetra- or pentanucleotide repeat microsatellites and thus were very easy to type using non-denaturing short gels and silver staining. For the dinucleotide repeat D5S299 we adapted a silver staining procedure to the large sequencing gels, but the technique is still cumbersome. However, based on the results in Table 1, we can actually demonstrate that if D5S299 had not been typed, our classification of the tumors would still remain the same. Hence, for clinical studies we can apparently limit ourselves to the five other microsatellites, considerably simplifying the problem.

The great majority of studies focusing on colorectal cancer have come from First World countries where this tumor is the second or third most common cancer and has shown a rising incidence (2). In Third World countries, colorectal cancer seems to be less common and it was important to ascertain whether the relative importance of the two recognized pathogenetic mechanisms was the same in both environments. The rates of DNA replication errors, as well as the rates of LOH linked to the tumor suppressor genes p53 and DCC obtained in this study, were closely similar to the frequencies reported by others. We observed loss of heterozygosity at p53 in 8 of 14 informative tumors (57%), a value similar to published data ranging from 40 to 76% (26-28). We observed loss of heterozygosity at D18S51 in 6 of 16 informative tumors (38%), a value similar to published data ranging from 34 to 52% (27,28). On the other hand, we did not observe any LOH in 17 tumors informative for D5S299. However, when compared with the expected frequency (16-20%; Refs. 27-29) this is not significantly different (c² = 2.5; 0.2>P>0.1), suggesting that, at least at this data level, the epidemiology of colorectal cancers in Brazil does not differ significantly from that of Europe and the United States.

Address for correspondence: S.D.J. Pena, Departamento de Bioquímica e Imunologia, ICB, UFMG, Caixa Postal 486, 30161-970 Belo Horizonte, MG, Brasil. Fax: [phone]. E-mail: [e-mail]

Research supported by CNPq and FAPEMIG. Received February 28, 1997. Accepted June 3, 1997.

• 1. Cavenee WK & White RL (1995). The genetic basis of cancer. Scientific American, 272: 50-57.
• 2. Dunlop MG (1992). Screening for large bowel neoplasms in individuals with a family history of colorectal cancer. British Journal of Surgery, 79: 488-494.
• 3. Vogelstein B & Kinzler KW (1993). The multistep nature of cancer. Trends in Genetics, 9: 138-141.
• 4. Groden J, Thliveris A, Samowitz W, Carlson M, Gelbert L, Albertsen H, Joslyn G, Stevens J, Spirio L, Robertson M, Sargeant L, Krapcho K, Wolff E, Burt R, Hughes JP, Warrington J, McPherson J, Wasmuth J, Le Paslier D, Abderrahim H, Cohen D, Leppert M & White R (1991). Identification and characterization of the familial adenomatous polyposis coli gene. Cell, 66: 589-600.
• 5. Miyaki M, Konishi M, Kikuchi-Yanoshita R, Enomoto M, Igari T, Tanaka K, Muraoka M, Takahashi H, Amada Y, Fukayama M, Maeda Y, Iwama T, Mishima Y, Mori T & Koike M (1994). Characteristics of somatic mutation of the adenomatous polyposis coli gene in colorectal tumors. Cancer Research, 54: 3011-3020.
• 6. Nigro JM, Baker SJ, Preisinger AC, Jessup JM, Hostetter R, Cleary K, Bigner SH, Davidson N, Baylin S, Devilee P, Glover T, Collins FS, Weston A, Modali R, Harris CC & Vogelstein B (1989). Mutations in the p53 gene occur in diverse human tumour types. Nature, 342: 705-708.
• 7. Vogelstein B, Fearon ER, Hamilton SR, Kern SE, Preisinger AC, Leppert M, Nakamura Y, White R, Smits AMM & Bos JL (1988). Genetic alterations during colorectal tumor development. New England Journal of Medicine, 319: 525-532.
• 8. de la Chapelle A & Peltomäki P (1995). Genetics of hereditary colon cancer. Annual Review of Genetics, 29: 329-348.
• 9. Eshleman JR & Markowitz SD (1996). Mismatch repair defects in human carcinogenesis. Human Molecular Genetics, 5: 1489-1494.
• 10. Simpson AJG (1997). The natural somatic mutation frequency and human carcinogenesis. Advances in Cancer Research, 71: 209-240.
• 11. Reitmair AH, Cai JC, Bjerknes M, Redston M, Cheng M, Pind MT, Hay K, Mitri K, Bapat BV, Mak TW & Gallinger S (1996). MSH2 deficiency contributes to accelerated APC-mediated intestinal tumorigenesis. Cancer Research, 56: 2922-2926.
• 12. Jeffreys AJ & Pena SDJ (1993). A brief introduction to human DNA fingerprinting. In: Pena SDJ, Chakraborty R, Epplen JT & Jeffreys AJ (Editors), DNA Fingerprinting: State of the Science Birkhäuser Verlag, Basel, 1-20.
• 13. Dover G (1995). Slippery DNA runs on and on and on... Nature Genetics, 10: 254-256.
• 14. Bocker T, Schlegel J, Kullmann F, Stumm G, Zirngibl H, Epplen JT & Ruschoff J (1996). Genomic instability in colorectal carcinomas: comparison of different evaluation methods and their biological significance. Journal of Pathology, 179: 15-19.
• 15. Bubb VJ, Curtis LJ, Cunningham C, Dunlop MG, Carothers AD, Morris RG, White S, Bird CC & Wyllie AH (1996). Microsatellite instability and the role of hMSH2 in sporadic colorectal cancer. Oncogene, 12: 2641-2649.
• 16. Lothe RA, Peltomäki P, Meling GE, Aaaltonen LA, Nyström-Lahti M, Pylkkanen L, Heimdal K, Andersen TI, Moller P, Rognum TO, Fossa SD, Haldorsen T, Langmark F, Brogger A & de la Chapelle A (1993). Genomic instability in colorectal cancer; relationship, clinicopathological variables and family history. Cancer Research, 53: 5849-5852.
• 17. Haddad LA & Pena SDJ (1993). CAT repeat polymorphism in a human expressed sequence tag (EST00444) (D13S308). Human Molecular Genetics, 2: 1748.
• 18. Santos FR, Pena SDJ & Epplen JT (1993). Genetic and population study of an Y-linked tetranucleotide repeat DNA polymorphism with a simple non-isotopic technique. Human Genetics, 90: 655-656.
• 19. Haddad LO, Fuzikawa A & Pena SDJ (1997). Simultaneous detection of size and sequence variation in the polymorphic microsatellite D2S196E (EST 00493). Human Genetics, 99: 796-800.
• 20. Vago AR, Macedo AM, Oliveira RP, Andrade LO, Chiari E, Galvăo LMC, Reis DA, Pereira MES, Simpson AJG, Tostes S & Pena SDJ (1996). kDNA signatures of Trypanosoma cruzi strains obtained directly from infected tissues. American Journal of Pathology, 149: 2153-2159.
• 21. Futreal PA, Barrett JC & Wiseman RW (1991). An Alu polymorphism intragenic to the TP53 gene. Nucleic Acids Research, 19: 6977.
• 22. Hahn M, Serth J, Fislage R, Wolfes H, Allhoff E, Jonas U & Pingoud A (1993). Polymerase chain reaction detection of a highly polymorphic VNTR segment in intron 1 of the human p53 gene. Clinical Chemistry, 39: 549-550.
• 23. Urquhart A, Oldroyd NJ, Kimpton CP & Gill P (1995). Highly discriminating heptaplex short tandem repeat PCR system for forensic identification. Biotechniques, 18: 116-121.
• 24. Van Leeuwen C, Tops C, Breukel C, van der Klift H, Fodde R & Khan PM (1991). CA repeat polymorphism at the D5S299 locus linked to adenomatous polyposis coli (APC). Nucleic Acids Research, 19: 5805.
• 25. Roewer L, Arnemann J, Spurr NK, Grzeschik K-H & Epplen JT (1992). Simple repeat sequences on the human Y chromosome are equally polymorphic as their autosomal counterparts. Human Genetics, 89: 389-394.
• 26. Lothe A, Nakamura Y, Woodward S, Gedde-Dahl T & White R (1988). VNTR (variable number of tandem repeats) markers show loss of chromosome 17p sequences in human colorectal carcinomas. Cytogenetics and Cell Genetics, 48: 167-169.
• 27. Law DJ, Olschwang S, Monpezat JP, Lefrancois D, Jagelman D, Petrelli NJ, Thomas G & Feinberg AP (1988). Concerted nonsyntenic allelic loss in human colorectal carcinoma. Science, 241: 961-965.
• 28. Iacopetta B, Di Grandi S, Dix B, Haig C, Soong R & House A (1994). Loss of heterozygosity of tumour suppressor gene loci in human colorectal carcinoma. European Journal of Cancer, 30A: 664-670.
• 29. Solomon E, Voss R, Hall V, Bodmer WF, Jass JR, Jeffreys AJ, Lucibello FC, Patel I & Rider SH (1987). Chromosome 5 allele loss in human colorectal carcinomas. Nature, 328: 616-619.

Utilization of microsatellites for the analysis of genomic alterations in colorectal cancers in Brazil

A.K. Fuzikawa¹, L.A. Haddad¹, J.R. da-Cunha-Melo², G. Brasileiro-Filho³ and S.D.J. Pena^1,4

Correspondence and Footnotes

Publication Dates

• Publication in this collection
  28 Nov 2001
• Date of issue
  Aug 1997

History

• Accepted
  03 June 1997
• Received
  28 Feb 1997