On-line version ISSN 1414-431X
Braz J Med Biol Res vol.34 no.8 Ribeirão Preto Aug. 2001
Braz J Med Biol Res, August 2001, Volume 34(8) 971-975 (Short Communication)
Heparan sulfate and control of cell division: adhesion and proliferation of mutant CHO-745 cells lacking xylosyl transferase
1Departamento de Bioquímica, Escola Paulista de Medicina, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brasil
2Departamento de Bioquímica, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, RN, Brasil
3Departamento de Biologia Celular, Universidade Federal do Paraná, Curitiba, PR, Brasil
We have examined the role of cell surface glycosaminoglycans in cell division: adhesion and proliferation of Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells. We used both wild-type (CHO-K1) cells and a mutant (CHO-745) which is deficient in the synthesis of proteoglycans due to lack of activity of xylosyl transferase. Using different amounts of wild-type and mutant cells, little adhesion was observed in the presence of laminin and type I collagen. However, when fibronectin or vitronectin was used as substrate, there was an enhancement in the adhesion of wild-type and mutant cells. Only CHO-K1 cells showed a time-dependent adhesion on type IV collagen. These results suggest that the two cell lines present different adhesive profiles. Several lines of experimental evidence suggest that heparan sulfate proteoglycans play a role in cell adhesion as positive modulators of cell proliferation and as key participants in the process of cell division. Proliferation and cell cycle assays clearly demonstrate that a decrease in the amount of glycosaminoglycans does not inhibit the proliferation of mutant CHO-745 cells when compared to the wild type CHO-K1, in agreement with the findings that both CHO-K1 and CHO-745 cells take 8 h to enter the S phase.
Key words: CHO cells, extracellular matrix proteins, proteoglycans, glycosaminoglycans, cell adhesion, cell proliferation
Heparan sulfate proteoglycans are ubiquitously present on the cell surface and in the extracellular matrix (ECM). The major cell surface proteoglycan families are syndecans and glypicans. The expression of heparan sulfate proteoglycans is cell type specific (1), and different cells can express specific core protein with heparan sulfate (HS) chains of distinct disaccharide sequences and binding properties (1). Studies with different tissues and cell lines during the last decade have revealed the putative roles of heparan sulfate proteoglycans in cell adhesion, modulation of growth factor activities, and ECM organization. All of these roles are mediated by interactions with extracellular and cytoplasmic ligands (2).
HS chains contain the same disaccharide units albeit in different proportions among organisms as diverse as insects, mollusks, and mammals. The conservation of HS binding by extracellular proteins suggests that their association with HS is ancient and functionally relevant (3).
HS has been implicated in a variety of biological processes including the regulation of glomerular basement membrane permeability, the assembly of basement membranes, the regulation of nuclear metabolism (4), blood coagulation (5), viral and bacterial infection (6), and tumor cell malignancy (4). Several disease conditions such as cardiovascular diseases (4) and diabetes (7) are associated with changes in the expression of proteoglycans as well as with structural and functional alterations of their glycosaminoglycan chains. HS chains are known to interact with a variety of proteins such as heparin-binding growth factors, ECM, selectins, protease inhibitors and lipoprotein lipase (4) and are thereby implicated in various cell processes. HS binds to and regulates the activity of growth factors, cytokines, superoxide dismutase and antithrombin, which contribute to aberrant cell proliferation, migration and matrix production (4). They are clearly involved in adhesion, morphological regulation during development, remodeling and changes in cell shape (8-10).
Effect of heparan sulfate on cell adhesion
Cell adhesion plays a key role in the maintenance of tissue organization in multicellular organisms. Cell adhesion requires HS-ligand binding and direct or indirect interactions of core protein with cytoskeletal and signaling molecules. The ECM ligands bind to cell surface heparan sulfate proteoglycans and cause actin filament reorganization (4). The interaction of HS chains with extracellular ligands may help the formation of proteoglycan clusters, which appears to be critical for focal adhesion formation (4). Focal adhesions in many cell types grown on various substrates contain syndecan-4 (11). HS binding to cell adhesion molecules and syndecans localized at adherens junctions (4) show that cell surface heparan sulfate proteoglycans mediate physiological cell-cell interactions. HS binds the immunoglobulin superfamily of adhesion molecules PECAM-1 and N-CAM (4). Cell surface-associated heparan sulfate proteoglycans, predominantly perlecan, are involved in the process of binding and endocytosis of thrombospondin-1 by vascular endothelial cells (12).
Cell attachment is a reaction that depends on time of incubation as well as on the concentrations of cell surface receptors and ligands. Since cell surface proteoglycans have been proposed to participate in cell adhesion processes, we have examined the attachment of wild-type (CHO-K1) and mutant (CHO-745) cells that are unable to synthesize proteoglycans to wells coated with fibronectin (FN) at different concentrations and times of exposure (Figure 1). The different strains behaved almost identically, i.e., wild-type and mutant cells attached to a fixed amount of FN in a time-dependent reaction that was completed in @40 min for wild-type and @60 min for mutant cells (Figure 1A). Both cells also attached similarly to limiting amounts of FN adsorbed in the wells (Figure 1B). Wells coated with <4 µg FN allowed only submaximal numbers of cells to attach. We also demonstrated that both cell lines show poor adhesion to laminin (LN) and type I collagen. This was observed with a limited number of cells. On the other hand, there is a change in cell adhesion in the presence of FN and vitronectin (VN) when the mutant cells are plated at higher concentrations. The results of our study suggest that although negligible amounts of glycosaminoglycans are present in mutant CHO-745 cells, their attachment to some ECM components (FN and VN) is not affected (Figure 2). When type IV collagen was the substrate, CHO-K1 demonstrated a time-dependent cell adhesion. Furthermore, little adhesion observed in CHO-745 cells was not time-dependent (Figure 2).
[View larger version of this image (116 K GIF file)]
[View larger version of this image (46 K GIF file)]
Heparan sulfate proliferation and cell cycle
Several studies have suggested that heparan sulfate proteoglycans are involved in the control of cell growth (8-10,13). Cell proliferation and differentiation are regulated by a broad range of growth factors and cytokines, many of which bind heparin or HS with a relatively high affinity (14), regulating cell proliferation and differentiation. These include the family of fibroblast growth factors (FGF), hepatocyte growth factor, platelet-derived growth factor, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), g-interferon, and various chemokines (13,15). These molecules bind to high-affinity cell surface receptors, but in many cases, efficient signal transduction also requires HS, since in mutant cell lines lacking heparan sulfate proteoglycans or in cells treated with chlorate or heparitinase, cellular responses are dramatically decreased (16). Syndecans-1, -2 and -4 as well as glypican-1 possess HS which carry out this function (17). The action of HS as a positive modulator of cell proliferation is due to its capacity to bind and act as co-receptor for growth factors, such as FGF (14). VEGF, FGF, heparin-binding epidermal growth factor, interleukin-3, and g-interferon form strong complexes with heparan sulfate proteoglycans (18). The crystal structures of FGF-2 and heparin oligosaccharides show specific interactions between Asp28, Arg121, Lys126, and Gln135 of the growth factor and the iduronic acid 2-O-sulfate and glucosamine N-sulfate residues as well as other carboxyl groups present in the heparin oligosaccharides (19).
HS can participate in the process of cell division in two different ways, either as a modulator or in response to a mitogenic stimulus (14). A significant decrease in HS is observed in regenerating rat liver after partial hepatectomy. The peak of mitotic activity coincided with the smallest amounts of HS (13). It was also shown that increased HS synthesis mediated by protein kinase C inhibits cell proliferation in endothelial cells in culture. On the other hand, a decrease of surface HS was observed at the G1 phase of the cell cycle (20). Corroborating the previous observations for endothelial cells (20), the present results clearly demonstrate that a diminished amount of glycosaminoglycans does not inhibit the proliferation of mutant CHO-745 cells, which is similar to that of the wild-type CHO-K1 (data not shown). Both cell types enter and progress through the S phase after about 8 h. It is interesting to note that the wild-type CHO-K1 cell has a slightly higher cell proliferation than the mutant CHO-745 cell type when we analyze the number of cells (data not shown). This could possibly explain why wild-type CHO-K1 incorporates more thymidine (data not shown).
Cell adhesion is a process dependent on intact proteoglycan molecules since it requires both HS-ligand binding and direct or indirect interactions of the protein core with cytoskeletal and/or signaling molecules (2). The use of the HS-deficient mutant CHO-745 and the wild-type CHO-K1 demonstrated that heparan sulfate proteoglycans were not involved in cell adhesion to FN, VN, LN and type I collagen or in cell cycle and cell proliferation. Finally, our results strongly suggest that adhesion of the cells to type IV collagen is dependent on heparan sulfate proteoglycans since the mutant cell line lacks this property.
1. David G (1993). Integral membrane heparan sulfate proteoglycans. FASEB Journal, 7: 1023-1030. [ Links ]
2. Tumova S, Woods A & Couchman JR (2000). Heparan sulfate chains from glypican and syndecans bind the Hep II domain of fibronectin similarly despite minor structural differences. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 275: 9410-9417. [ Links ]
3. Medeiros GF, Mendes A, Castro RAB, Baú EC, Nader HB & Dietrich CP (2000). Distribution of sulfated glycosaminoglycans in the animal kingdom: widespread occurrence of heparin-like compounds in invertebrates. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, 1475: 1-8. [ Links ]
4. Bernfield M, Gotte M, Park PW, Reizes O, Fitzgerald ML, Lincecum J & Zako M (1999). Functions of cell surface heparan sulfate proteoglycans. Annual Review of Biochemistry, 68: 729-777. [ Links ]
5. Bianchini P, Osima B, Parma B, Nader HB & Dietrich CP (1985). Lack of correlation of in vitro and in vivo antithrombotic activity of heparin fractions and related compounds. Heparan sulfate as an antithrombotic agent in vivo. Thrombosis Research, 40: 597-607. [ Links ]
6. Rostand KS & Esko JD (1997). Microbial adherence to and invasion through proteoglycans. Infection and Immunity, 65: 1-8. [ Links ]
7. van der Woude FJ & van Det NF (1997). Heparan sulfate proteoglycans and diabetic nephropathy. Experimental Nephrology, 5: 180-188. [ Links ]
8. Dietrich CP, Sampaio LO, Toledo OMS & Cassaro CMF (1977). Cell recognition and adhesiveness. A possible biological role for the sulfated mucopolysaccharides. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, 75: 329-336. [ Links ]
9. Dietrich CP & Armelin HA (1978). Sulfated mucopolysaccharides from normal 3T3 cells and its tumorigenic variant ST1: Possible role of chondroitin sulfates in neoplastic transformation. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, 84: 794-801. [ Links ]
10. Dietrich CP (1984). A model for cell-cell recognition and control of cell growth mediated by sulfated glycosaminoglycans. Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research, 17: 5-15. [ Links ]
11. Couchman JR & Woods A (1996). Syndecans, signaling and cell adhesion. Journal of Cellular Biochemistry, 61: 578-584. [ Links ]
12. Feisten K, Hausser H, Robenek H, Kresse H & Vischer P (2000). Interaction of thrombospondin-1 and heparan sulfate from endothelial cells. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 275: 9396-9402. [ Links ]
13. Porcionatto MA, Nader HB & Dietrich CP (1999). Heparan sulfate and cell division. Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research, 32: 539-544. [ Links ]
14. Gambarini AG, Miyamoto CA, Nader HB & Dietrich CP (1993). Mitogenic activity of acidic fibroblast growth factor is enhanced by highly sulfated oligosaccharides derived from heparin and heparan sulfate. Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry, 124: 121-129. [ Links ]
15. Porcionatto MA, Pinto CRM, Dietrich CP & Nader HB (1994). Heparan sulfate proteoglycan and control of cell proliferation: enhanced synthesis induced by phorbol ester (PMA) during G1-phase. Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research, 27: 2185-2190. [ Links ]
16. Higashiyama S, Abraham JA & Klagsbrun M (1993). Heparin-binding EGF-like growth factor stimulation of smooth muscle cell migration: dependence on interaction with cell surface heparan sulfate. Journal of Cell Biology, 122: 933-940. [ Links ]
17. Rosenberg RD, Showorak NW, Liu J, Schwartz JJ & Zhang L (1997). Heparan sulfate proteoglycans of the cardiovascular system: specific structures emerge but how is synthesis regulated. Journal of Clinical Investigation, 99: 2062-2070. [ Links ]
18. Nelson RM, Venot A, Bevilacqua MP, Linhardt RJ & Stamenkovic I (1995). Carbohydrate-protein interactions in vascular biology. Annual Review of Cell Biology, 11: 601-631. [ Links ]
19. Faham S, Hileman RE, Fromm JR, Linhardt RJ & Ress DC (1996). Heparin structure and interactions with basic fibroblast growth factor. Science, 271: 1116-1120. [ Links ]
20. Porcionatto MA, Moreira CR, Armelin HA, Dietrich CP & Nader HB (1998). Stimulation of heparan sulfate proteoglycan synthesis and secretion during G1 phase induced by growth factors and PMA. Journal of Cellular Biochemistry, 70: 563-572. [ Links ]
Address for correspondence: C.P. Dietrich or H.B. Nader, Departamento de Bioquímica, EPM, UNIFESP, Rua 3 de Maio, 100, 4º andar, 04044-020 São Paulo, SP, Brasil. Fax: +55-11-573-6407. E-mail: email@example.com
Presented at SIMEC 2000 - International Symposium on Extracellular Matrix, Angra dos Reis, RJ, Brazil, September 24-27, 2000. Research supported by FAPESP, CAPES and CNPq. Received September 22, 2000. Accepted May 23, 2001.