Acessibilidade / Reportar erro

Obese women on a low energy rice and bean diet: effects of leucine, arginine or glycine supplementation on protein turnover

Abstract

This study examined if leucine, arginine or glycine supplementation in adult obese patients (body mass index of 33 ± 4 kg/m²) consuming a Brazilian low energy and protein diet (4.2 MJ/day and 0.6 g protein/kg) affects protein and amino acid metabolism. After four weeks adaptation to this diet, each subject received supplements of these amino acids (equivalent to 0.2 g protein kg-1 day-1) in random order. On the seventh day of each amino acid supplementation, a single-dose 15N-glycine study was carried out. There were no significant differences in protein flux, synthesis or breakdown. The protein flux (grams of nitrogen, gN/9 h) was 55 ± 24 during the nonsupplemented diet intake and 39 ± 10, 44 ± 22 and 58 ± 35 during the leucine-, glycine- and arginine-supplemented diet intake, respectively; protein synthesis (gN/9 h) was 57 ± 24, 36 ± 10, 41 ± 22 and 56 ± 36, respectively; protein breakdown (gN/9 h) was 51 ± 24, 34 ± 10, 32 ± 28 and 53 ± 35, respectively; kinetic balance (gN/9 h) was 3.2 ± 1.8, 4.1 ± 1.7, 3.4 ± 2.9 and 3.9 ± 1.6. There was no difference in amino acid profiles due to leucine, arginine or glycine supplementation. The present results suggest that 0.6 g/kg of dietary protein is enough to maintain protein turnover in obese women consuming a reduced energy diet and that leucine, arginine or glycine supplementation does not change kinetic balance or protein synthesis.

obese women; protein; glycine; arginine; leucine; stable isotope


Braz J Med Biol Res, October 2001, Volume 34(10) 1277-1283

Obese women on a low energy rice and bean diet: effects of leucine, arginine or glycine supplementation on protein turnover

J.S. Marchini1, C.R. Lambertini1, E. Ferriolli2 and J.E. Dutra de Oliveira1

1Divisão de Nutrição Clínica, and 2Divisão de Medicina Geriátrica e Interna Geral e Laboratório de Espectrometria de Massa, Departamento de Clínica Médica, Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto, Universidade de São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brasil

References

Correspondence and Footnotes Correspondence and Footnotes Correspondence and Footnotes

Abstract

This study examined if leucine, arginine or glycine supplementation in adult obese patients (body mass index of 33 ± 4 kg/m2) consuming a Brazilian low energy and protein diet (4.2 MJ/day and 0.6 g protein/kg) affects protein and amino acid metabolism. After four weeks adaptation to this diet, each subject received supplements of these amino acids (equivalent to 0.2 g protein kg-1 day-1) in random order. On the seventh day of each amino acid supplementation, a single-dose 15N-glycine study was carried out. There were no significant differences in protein flux, synthesis or breakdown. The protein flux (grams of nitrogen, gN/9 h) was 55 ± 24 during the nonsupplemented diet intake and 39 ± 10, 44 ± 22 and 58 ± 35 during the leucine-, glycine- and arginine-supplemented diet intake, respectively; protein synthesis (gN/9 h) was 57 ± 24, 36 ± 10, 41 ± 22 and 56 ± 36, respectively; protein breakdown (gN/9 h) was 51 ± 24, 34 ± 10, 32 ± 28 and 53 ± 35, respectively; kinetic balance (gN/9 h) was 3.2 ± 1.8, 4.1 ± 1.7, 3.4 ± 2.9 and 3.9 ± 1.6. There was no difference in amino acid profiles due to leucine, arginine or glycine supplementation. The present results suggest that 0.6 g/kg of dietary protein is enough to maintain protein turnover in obese women consuming a reduced energy diet and that leucine, arginine or glycine supplementation does not change kinetic balance or protein synthesis.

Key words: obese women, protein, glycine, arginine, leucine, stable isotope

Introduction

Obese subjects have increased protein turnover, whole-body protein synthesis and oxidation compared with same age lean adults (1). It has been suggested that protein balance in obese subjects is not maintained with a protein intake lower than 70 g/day when energy is restricted to 1100 kcal/day (4.5 MJ) (2). Garlick et al. (3) have also shown that when energy is restricted, the nitrogen balance decreases and is improved by high protein intake.

Supplementation with amino acids themselves has not been tested as a protein-sparing method during low energy diets in the treatment of obesity, but as a source of nitrogen one can expect it to be effective. Moreover, some amino acids have known pharmacological properties which could be of potential benefit for protein metabolism (4), and the effect of supplementation with these amino acids during low energy diets on obese persons has not been reported.

Two amino acids, arginine and leucine, are particularly recognized to have pharmacological in addition to nutritional properties. Arginine (L-2-amino-5-guanidinovaleric acid) is an aliphatic amino acid which has an important role in immune function and stimulates the release of growth hormone by the pituitary gland (5). Arginine is also a physiological precursor of nitric oxide (endothelium-derived relaxing factor) and this has been suggested as an explanation for its hypotensive effect on healthy subjects (6). Leucine (L-2-amino-4-methyl valeric acid) is a branched chain essential amino acid that has important roles in protein and glucose metabolism, neurotransmitter synthesis and lymphoid tissue metabolism (7).

This study was intended to test if supplementation with arginine and leucine improves protein and amino acid metabolism in obese patients consuming a low energy diet. To determine if any eventual changes in protein metabolism would be due to their pharmacological properties, we also studied a period of supplementation with glycine, an amino acid with no such effects. All supplementation periods were compared with nonsupplemented (control) ones.

Material and Methods

Subjects

Seven obese women aged 36 ± 8 years were studied. Each subject underwent detailed clinical evaluation and blood tests (complete hematologic cell count, plasma glucose, creatinine and urea levels) and, apart from obesity, no other acute or chronic illnesses were detected. No subjects were pregnant or breastfeeding. After the initial evaluation, a dietary history was obtained and each subject was instructed to eat a local rice and bean diet (see below) and to maintain their usual level of activity.

This study was approved by the local Ethics Committee. Written informed consent was obtained from each subject after detailed information about the purposes and risks of this research.

Study design

Each volunteer received a low energy rice and bean diet (4.2 MJ) with a total protein intake of 0.6 g kg-1 day-1 throughout the 8-week study period. This diet, which has been used in previous similar research protocols, does not have any amino acid deficiency and reflects a typical Brazilian diet (8-10).

After an adaptation period of 4 weeks, the rice and bean diet was supplemented with leucine, arginine and glycine in random order (equivalent to 0.2 g protein kg-1 day-1) for 7 days each, so that each subject participated in four study periods. Between 7-day supplementation periods, the subjects received a nonsupplemented rice and bean diet for 2 days (washout period). A period of 7 days on a nonsupplemented diet was also studied (control).

On the 7th day of each period, a 9-h whole-body 15N-glycine single-dose study was carried out (11) after a 12-h fast. Each subject was given six isoenergetic, isonitrogenous meals at 2-h intervals, which provided half the total usual daily energy, protein and supplemented leucine, arginine or glycine intake (i.e., 2.2 MJ, 0.3 g protein kg-1 day-1 from rice and beans, and an amino acid supplement equivalent to 0.2 g kg-1 day-1). Two hours after the first meal, the bladder was emptied for baseline urine enrichment determination and a dose of 15N-glycine (200 mg per subject) was given (0 h). All urine was collected until the 9th h of study for urea and ammonia 15N enrichment determination. Two blood samples were taken for urea 15N enrichment determination at 0 h and 9 h (12).

Protein turnover

Flux was calculated from the amount of isotope excreted in urine in the end product (urea and ammonia) over the 9-h study period. In addition, the amount of label retained in the urea pool at 9 h was used to adjust the result of flux based on the label excreted in urinary urea (13). Flux was calculated as: Q = d x Ex/ex, where Q is flux, d is the amount of isotope administered, Ex is the amount of end product excreted, and ex is the amount of isotope excreted as the end product over the study period. The end product average flux was taken as the harmonic mean of the estimates of flux based on the excretion of urea-N and ammonia-N, and was used in the calculation of protein synthesis and breakdown rates (12). Protein synthesis and degradation were estimated from: Q = Nint + D = Ex + S, where Nint is nitrogen intake, D is the equivalent of protein degradation, and S is the equivalent of protein synthesis.

Sample analysis

Urine was collected into containers with 5 ml concentrated HCl. Samples were stored at -20oC until triplicate analysis. Aliquots were taken for duplicate determination of total nitrogen, ammonia-N, urea-N, ammonia-15N, urea-15N (14) and free amino acids (15). Total nitrogen was measured by the Kjeldahl method. Urea and ammonia were extracted sequentially by Conway diffusion and titration for mass spectrometry analysis by alkaline aeration. Isotope enrichment was measured with a mass spectrometer (Anca 20-20, Europa Scientific, Cheshire, England). Plasma amino acid was analyzed by high- performance liquid chromatography (Shimadzu Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) after precolumn fluorescence derivatization with ortho-phthaldialdehyde (15).

Statistical analysis

The repeated measures design was used for statistical analysis, with one-way within-subjects ANOVA (for repeated measures or amino acid supplement). Thus, the repeated measure factor had four levels: no supplement, leucine supplement, glycine supplement and arginine supplement, in random order (16). Post hoc comparisons were made using the Tukey test. Fasted state was compared to fed state by the paired t-test. P values of 0.05 or less were considered significant.

Results

Anthropometric and biochemical data are shown in Table 1. Body mass index and arm fat index decreased significantly from day one to day 35 (adaptation period) and then remained constant up to the end of the study (Table 1). Blood biochemical data did not change significantly. Urinary urea excretion was higher on the first day of the study as compared to any other study period and urinary urea excretion remained constant from week 2 to 8.

 

Subjects 2 and 3 were excluded from the repeated statistical analysis because samples from one study period were lost for both subjects for technical reasons. There were no significant differences in whole-body protein turnover between the period of nonsupplemented rice and bean diet intake and any period of leucine, arginine or glycine supplementation (Table 2). There were also no significant differences in plasma or urinary amino acid profiles between fasted or fed state or between the nonsupplemented and different supplementation periods (Table 3).

 

[print this table in landscape]

Discussion

In this study, a protein intake of 0.6 g kg-1 day-1 was sufficient to maintain protein turnover in obese women on a reduced energy diet. During the experimental protocol, as expected, there was a drop in anthropometric measurements, but from around the fourth week on, after the adaptation period, there was anthropometric and biochemical stabilization. This may reflect the occurrence of energy expenditure reduction in response to the reduced energy intake, a phenomenon demonstrated by other authors (17). For this research, this stabilization represented, in fact, an advantage, as it eliminated the possibility of misinterpretation of results due to changes in body weight.

The rates of whole-body protein flux were measured using a single oral dose of 15N-glycine (3,13). There is evidence that the method of 15N-glycine infusion employed in whole-body protein turnover studies (i.e., constant infusion, repeated or single dose) does not affect the results (3,13). Besides, the use of a single dose permits the repetition of the study for many times, allowing the follow-up of time course changes in protein synthesis and breakdown (3). For whole-body protein turnover studies it is assumed that the nitrogen pool is homogenous and that the nitrogen exchange among different pools is constant under the experimental conditions used. However, the hypothesis of homogeneity and stability of the metabolic pool of body nitrogen is valid only under exceptional circumstances (12,18). For this reason, the fact that in the present investigation the same subject was studied under different conditions seems to be advantageous. Also, since this permitted the comparison of results with baseline and with every other period, any possible methodological problem would have been diluted in the overall experiment (19). Although this method implies an oversimplification of the complex reactions of protein kinetics in vivo, when it is applied under controlled experimental conditions it affords useful information concerning the dynamics of human protein metabolism (20).

Previous studies have shown that 0.6 g protein kg-1 day-1 is sufficient to keep the nitrogen equilibrium in healthy Brazilian persons on a rice and bean diet (9,10). It is possible that obese subjects have the same protein requirements, which remain unchanged during the low energy diet, as also proposed by others. Solini et al. (21) found no differences in leucine flux, oxidation or non-oxidative disposal between non-diabetic obese women and normal women. Other studies conducted on eutrophic subjects receiving 0.5 g protein kg-1 day-1 (10,22) found a kinetic balance close to that of the present study. Vazquez et al. (23) showed that an increase of the protein composition of isoenergetic weight reduction diets (2.5 KJ/day) from 50 to 70 g/day leads to no changes in nitrogen balance.

In the present study, whole-body nitrogen flux (around 39-58 mg nitrogen kg-1 h-1) was higher than that obtained for control subjects (around 17-46 mg nitrogen kg-1 h-1) (10,13) with a mean body mass index of 25 kg/m2. Protein synthesis and breakdown were also higher than values reported in the literature for normal body weight individuals (10,11,22) but similar to those reported for obese adolescents (24). One of these studies (10) was done using the same protocol/environmental conditions as the present study. It should also be pointed out that the variation in the data obtained here for obese subjects was similar to that observed in other studies of protein metabolism (1-3,20,21,24).

Leucine, arginine or glycine supplementation (0.2 g kg-1 day-1) did not improve kinetic balance or protein synthesis compared with the baseline diet period. It is possible that, as the subjects had no changes in protein metabolism induced by the low energy diet, any eventual effects of supplementation remained undetectable.

Urine and plasma amino acid profile did not show any remarkable differences, with the exception of high mean plasma values for phenylalanine, leucine and methionine when compared to literature values for eutrophic women (25). Plasma amino acid levels were not modified by supplementation. Kihlberg et al. (19) have described high plasma levels of phenylalanine and leucine and also of isoleucine, valine, lysine, tyrosine, proline and glutamic acid in obese women. These results suggest that obese women may have a particular amino acid profile, but this should be confirmed by further studies.

In conclusion, the present study does not support the use of leucine, arginine or glycine supplementation during low energy diets for obese subjects with the objective of decreasing protein breakdown rate and/or increasing protein synthesis rate. Obese subjects are able to keep a stable protein metabolism on a diet containing 0.6 g protein kg-1 day-1 and providing an energy intake of 4.2 MJ/day. Further trials with longer follow-up periods are needed to determine if nitrogen kinetic balance is maintained during very low energy treatment regimens (or even drug treatments). In addition, we confirm that single-dose protein turnover studies are reliable, fast, inexpensive and easy to carry out in hospitalized patients. They can be used in short whole-body protein turnover studies in patients for whom long, continuous isotope infusion with gas and blood collection would be difficult or even impossible.

Address for correspondence: J.S. Marchini, Divisão de Nutrição Clínica, FMRP, USP, Av. Bandeirantes, 3900, 14049-900 Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brasil. Fax: +55-16-633-6695. E-mail: jsmarchi@fmrp.usp.br

Research supported by FAPESP (No. 97/09577-4). Received August 10, 2000. Accepted June 28, 2001.

  • 1. Welle S, Barnard RR, Statt M & Amatruda JM (1992). Increased protein turnover in obese women. Metabolism, 41: 1028-1034.
  • 2. Oi Y, Okuda T, Koishi H, Waki M, Kurata M & Nambu S (1987). Effects of low-energy diets on protein-metabolism studies with [N-15]glycine in obese patients. Journal of Nutritional Science and Vitaminology, 33: 227-237.
  • 3. Garlick PJ, Clugston GA & Waterlow JC (1980). Influence of low-energy diets on whole-body protein-turnover in obese subjects. American Journal of Physiology, 238: E235-E244.
  • 4. Shah OJ, Anthony JC, Kimball SR & Jefferson LS (2000). 4E-BP1 and S6K1: translational integration sites for nutritional and hormonal information in muscle. American Journal of Physiology, 279: E715-E729.
  • 5. Brittenden J, Heys SD, Miller I, Sarkar TK, Hutcheon AW, Needham G, Gilbert F, McKean M, Ah-See AK & Eremin O (1994). Dietary supplementation with L-arginine in patients with breast cancer (> 4 cm) receiving multimodality treatment: report of a feasibility study. British Journal of Cancer, 69: 918-921.
  • 6. Hishikawa K, Nakaki T, Suzuki H, Saruta T & Kato R (1991). L-arginine-induced hypotension. Lancet, 337: 683-684.
  • 7. Schauder P, Wahren J, Paoletti R, Bernardi R & Rinetti M (1992). Branched-Chain Amino Acids. Biochemistry, Physiopathology and Clinical Science 1st edn. Raven Press, New York.
  • 8. Vannucchi H, Duarte RMF & Dutra de Oliveira JE (1981). Nutritive value of a rice and beans based diet for agricultural migrant workers in Southern Brazil. Nutrition Reports International, 24: 129-134.
  • 9. Vannucchi H, Duarte RMF & Dutra de Oliveira JE (1983). Studies on the protein requirements of Brazilian rural workers ("bóias-frias") given a rice and bean diet. International Journal for Vitamin and Nutrition Research, 53: 338-344.
  • 10. Marchini JS, Moreira EAM, Moreira MZ, Hiramatsu T, Dutra de Oliveira JE & Vannucchi H (1996). Whole-body protein metabolism turnover in men on a high or low calorie rice and bean Brazilian diet. Nutrition Research, 16: 435-441.
  • 11. Fern EB, Garlick PJ, McNurlan MA & Waterlow JC (1981). The excretion of isotope in urea and ammonia for estimating protein turnover in man with [15N]glycine. Clinical Science, 61: 217-228.
  • 12. Fern EB, Garlick PJ & Waterlow JC (1985). Apparent compartmentation of body nitrogen in one human subject: its consequences in measuring the rate of whole-body protein synthesis with 15N. Clinical Science, 68: 271-282.
  • 13. Grove G & Jackson AA (1995). Measurement of protein-turnover in normal man using the end-product method with oral [N-15]glycine - comparison of single-dose and intermittent-dose regimens. British Journal of Nutrition, 74: 491-507.
  • 14. Waterlow JC, Garlick PJ & Millward DJ (1978). Protein Turnover in Mammalian Tissues and in the Whole Body North-Holland Publishing, Amsterdam, Holland.
  • 15. Lindroth P & Mopper K (1979). High performance liquid-chromatographic determination of subpicomole amounts of amino-acids by precolumn fluorescence derivatization with ortho-phthaldialdehyde. Analytical Chemistry, 51: 1667-1674.
  • 16. StatSoft (1994). Statistics for Windows: Statistics II Vol. 3. StatSoft, Inc., Tulsa, OK.
  • 17. Roberts SB, Fuss P, Heyman MB, Dallal GE & Young VR (1996). Effects of age on energy expenditure and substrate oxidation during experimental underfeeding in healthy men. Journals of Gerontology. Series A, Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences, 51A: B158-B166.
  • 18. Soares MJ, Piers LS, Shetty PS, Jackson AA & Waterlow JC (1994). Whole-body protein-turnover in chronically undernourished individuals. Clinical Science, 86: 441-446.
  • 19. Kihlberg R, Bark S & Hallberg D (1982). An oral amino acid loading test before and after intestinal bypass operation for morbid obesity. Acta Chirurgica Scandinavica, 148: 73-86.
  • 20. Winterer J, Bistrian BR, Bilmazes C, Blackburn GL & Young VR (1980). Whole body protein turnover, studied with 15N-glycine, and muscle protein breakdown in mildly obese subjects during a protein-sparing diet and brief total fast. Metabolism, 29: 575-581.
  • 21. Solini A, Bonora E, Bonadonna R, Castellino P & DeFronzo RA (1997). Protein metabolism in human obesity: relationship with glucose and lipid metabolism and with visceral adipose tissue. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism, 82: 2552-2558.
  • 22. Dichi I, Dichi JB, Papini-Berto SJ, Angeleli AYO, Bicudo MH, Rezende TA & Burini RC (1996). Protein-energy status and N-15-glycine kinetic study of Child A cirrhotic patients fed low- to high-protein energy diets. Nutrition, 12: 519-523.
  • 23. Vazquez JA, Kazi U & Madani N (1995). Protein metabolism during weight reduction with very-low-energy diets: evaluation of the independent effects of protein and carbohydrate on protein sparing. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 62: 93-103.
  • 24. Pencharz PB, Motil KJ, Parsons HG & Duffy BJ (1980). The effect of an energy-restricted diet on the protein metabolism of obese adolescents: nitrogen-balance and whole-body nitrogen turnover. Clinical Science, 59: 13-18.
  • 25. Lentner C (1984). Geigy Scientific Tables Vol 3 Physical Chemistry. Composition of Blood. Hematology, Somatometric Data 8th revised edn. Ciba-Geigy Limited, Basel, Switzerland, 82-83.
  • Correspondence and Footnotes

  • Publication Dates

    • Publication in this collection
      02 Oct 2001
    • Date of issue
      Oct 2001

    History

    • Received
      10 Aug 2000
    • Accepted
      28 June 2001
    Associação Brasileira de Divulgação Científica Av. Bandeirantes, 3900, 14049-900 Ribeirão Preto SP Brazil, Tel. / Fax: +55 16 3315-9120 - Ribeirão Preto - SP - Brazil
    E-mail: bjournal@terra.com.br