Services on Demand
- Cited by SciELO
- Access statistics
On-line version ISSN 1414-431X
Braz J Med Biol Res vol.44 no.2 Ribeirão Preto Feb. 2011 Epub Jan 14, 2011
In vivo and in vitro anti-inflammatory and anti-nociceptive activities of lovastatin in rodents
1Departamento de Fisiologia e Farmacologia, Faculdade de Medicina, 2Departamento de Farmácia, Faculdade de Farmácia, Odontologia e Enfermagem, 3Departamento de Morfologia, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade Federal do Ceará, Fortaleza, CE, Brasil
4Faculdade de Veterinária, Universidade Estadual do Ceará, Fortaleza, CE, Brasil
5Departamento de Biofisiologia, Faculdade de Medicina de Juazeiro do Norte, Juazeiro do Norte, CE, Brasil
Statins are among the most prescribed drugs in recent clinical practice. They are also known for their pleiotropic actions, which are independent of their lipid-lowering properties. The effect of lovastatin was investigated against carrageenan-induced paw edema in male Wistar rats (200-250 g) and on leukocyte migration, as measured by carrageenan-induced peritonitis in male Swiss mice (20-25 g), which are models of acute inflammation. Lovastatin (administered 1 h prior to carrageenan), at oral doses of 2, 5, and 10 mg/kg, markedly attenuated paw edema formation in rats at the 4th hour after carrageenan injection (25, 43, and 37% inhibition, respectively). Inhibitions of 20, 45 and 80% were observed in the leukocyte migration, as evaluated by carrageenan-induced peritonitis in mice with lovastatin doses of 0.5, 1 and 5 mg/kg, as compared to controls. Furthermore, lovastatin (administered 1 h before initiation) reduced the nociceptive effect of the formalin test in mice, at both phases, at doses of 2, 5, and 10 mg/kg: first phase (51, 65, and 70%, respectively) and second phase (73, 57, and 66% inhibition of licking time, respectively). The anti-nociceptive activity of lovastatin was inhibited by naloxone (3 mg/kg, sc). Lovastatin (0.01, 0.1, and 1 µg/mL) inhibited by 23, 79, and 86%, respectively, the release of myeloperoxidase from human neutrophils. Leukocyte (predominantly neutrophils) infiltration was almost completely reduced by lovastatin treatment, as observed in the model of acute paw edema with hematoxylin and eosin staining. In addition, lovastatin decreased the number of cells expressing tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) and the inducible form of nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) activity. Therefore, the alterations in leukocyte activity and cytokine release could contribute to the anti-inflammatory activity of lovastatin.
Key words: Statin; Inflammation; Anti-nociception; Myeloperoxidase; Cytokines
In the early 80’s, the statins, a new therapeutic class, were introduced as lipid-lowering agents. Since then, their role in the reduction of serum lipids has been extensively investigated in both experimental and clinical trials (1). Statins are among the most widely used prescription drugs, and exert their lipid-lowering actions by reversible and competitive inhibition of the enzyme 3-hydroxy-3-methyl-glutaryl-CoA reductase (HMG-CoA reductase), the rate-limiting step in the conversion of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) to mevalonate, a precursor of cholesterol (2). Statins also stimulate the hepatic expression of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol receptors, which in turn increase LDL uptake from the circulation (3). Statins are also known for their pleiotropic effects, which are independent of their lipid-lowering properties (4). Among the effects of statins, the most relevant are anti-atherosclerotic (5) and anti-inflammatory actions (6), improvement of endothelial dysfunction (7), anti-thrombosis (8) and anti-oxidant (9) actions, prevention of Alzheimer’s disease (10), and anti-neoplasic actions (3).
Several studies have shown the ability of statins to inhibit the production of inflammatory cytokines such as tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), interleukin-6 (IL-6) (11) and monocyte chemoattractant protein-1. Statins also seem to exert effects on the expression of nuclear factor kappaB (NF-κB), which plays a significant role in the production of pro-inflammatory mediators such as prostaglandins and adhesion molecules (12). These compounds also reduce C-reactive protein levels in clinical treatments (13). Furthermore, a recent study demonstrated the ability of statins to reduce polymorphonuclear leukocyte infiltration, one of the first steps in the development of inflammation (14).
Lovastatin is one of the most frequently investigated statins. It has been shown to exert anti-atherogenic, anti-thrombotic and anti-neoplasic effects, independent of its effects on serum lipids (15). Lovastatin can reduce cytokine production such as IL-2, IL-4, and interferon-gamma from activated human T cells, and can also down-regulate both activator protein-1 and NF-κB DNA-binding activities, as assessed by electrophoretic mobility shift assays (16).
The aims of the present study were to evaluate the anti-inflammatory properties of lovastatin on in vivo models of acute inflammation in rodents (carrageenan-induced paw edema in rats, and carrageenan-induced peritonitis in mice), and its anti-nociceptive effects (formalin test in mice). This is the first study showing that lovastatin, besides presenting a potent anti-inflammatory activity, produces anti-nociception and reduces pain of both neurogenic and inflammatory origin. Furthermore, we also investigated the effects of lovastatin on in vitro myeloperoxidase (MPO) release and on TNF-α and inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS)-expressing cells, and on rat paws after carrageenan-induced edema.
Lovastatin and dexamethasone were purchased from EMS Laboratory (Brazil) and dissolved in distilled water just before each experiment. Indomethacin, naloxone, carrageenan, and dextran were purchased from Sigma (USA) and formalin was purchased from Delta Laboratories (Brazil). Human leukocytes were kindly provided by the Ceará State Blood Center. All other reagents were of analytical grade.
Male Swiss mice (20-25 g) and male Wistar rats (200-250 g) were obtained from the Central Animal House of Universidade Federal do Ceará, Brazil. The animals were housed at 24 ± 2°C under a 12-h light/dark cycle, and had free access to a standard pellet diet (Purina chow, Brazil) and tap water. They were deprived of food, but not of drinking water, for 8 h before the experiments. The animals were treated according to current Brazilian law and to the NIH Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. The project was approved by the Animal’s Ethics Committee of the Faculty of Medicine, Federal University of Ceará. The doses of lovastatin were chosen on the basis of pilot studies.
Paw edema induced by carrageenan
Carrageenan-induced acute inflammation in the rat paw is used as a classical model of edema formation and hyperalgesia, for the study of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and selective cyclooxygenase-1 (COX-1) and COX-2 inhibitors. Five groups of 8 rats each were treated with lovastatin (LOV, 2, 5, and 10 mg/kg, po), indomethacin (INDO, 20 mg/kg, po), or vehicle (distilled water, po). One hour after receiving the drug(s), each animal received a subcutaneous injection of 0.1 mL 1% carrageenan in the right hind paw. The edema was measured immediately prior to the carrageenan injection and 1, 2, 3, 4, and 24 h later. The paw edema volume was determined in milliliters as the difference between the final and initial volumes, assessed with a plethysmometer from Ugo Basile, Italy.
Peritonitis induced by carrageenan
Mice were treated with LOV (0.5, 1, and 5 mg/kg, po), INDO (20 mg/kg, po) or vehicle (distilled water, po). One hour after treatment, each animal received an intraperitoneal injection of 0.25 mL 1% carrageenan to induce the inflammatory process (17) and, 4 h later, the animals were sacrificed by cervical dislocation. The peritoneal cavity was washed with 2 mL phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) containing heparin, and the exudate was then collected for analysis. An exudate sample of 20 µL was taken, and a 0.4-mL Turk’s solution was added to it. The total number of neutrophils was then counted in a Neubauer chamber using light microscope. Data are reported as the mean (x 103/mm3) number of leukocytes.
Nociception induced by formalin
The mouse formalin test is a model of tonic pain and localized inflammatory pain involving two response phases: the first (0-5 min) indicates neurogenic nociception, and the second (15-30 min) indicates inflammatory nociception (18). Groups of 8 mice each were treated with LOV (2, 5 and 10 mg/kg, po), morphine (10 mg/kg, sc) or naloxone (3 mg/kg, sc) 15 min prior to lovastatin or morphine administration. Thirty minutes later, each animal received a subcutaneous injection of 20 µL 1% formalin in the right paw. The time in seconds each mouse spent licking the injected paw was recorded.
Myeloperoxidase release from human neutrophils
The MPO release test from human neutrophils was performed according to Lucisano and Mantovani (19). MPO is widely used as a biomarker of inflammation. In the present study, 2.5 x 106 human leukocytes were suspended in buffered Hank’s balanced solution containing calcium and magnesium. The preparations contained predominantly neutrophils (85.0 ± 2.8%), and cell viability, determined by the Trypan blue test, was 97.7 ± 0.94%. Human neutrophils were incubated with LOV (0.01, 0.1 and 1 µg/mL) or INDO (35.7 μg/mL) as the reference drug, for 15 min at 37°C. Then, these cells (in the presence of LOV) were stimulated by the addition of phorbol myristate acetate (PMA, 0.1 µg/mL) for 15 min at 37°C and the suspension was centrifuged for 10 min at 2000 g, 4°C. Aliquots (50 μL) of the supernatants (without cells) were added to PBS (100 µL), phosphate buffer (50 µL, pH 7.0) and H2O2 (0.012%). After 5 min at 37°C, 20 µL 1.5 M 3,3’,5,5’-tetramethylbenzidine (TMB) was added as a substrate, and the reaction stopped with 30 µL 1.5 M sodium acetate, pH 3.0. The absorbance was then determined at 620 nm.
HE staining and immunohistochemistry analyses for TNF-α and iNOS
The streptavidin-biotin-peroxidase method was used for immunohistochemistry assays of TNF-α and iNOS (14). Three groups of mice were treated with either distilled water (normal controls) or LOV (5 mg/kg, po). After 30 min, an intraplantar injection of 1% carrageenan was administered to the animals, except the normal controls, and 3 h later, all animals were sacrificed and 5 mm plantar region sections were immersed in buffered formalin solution for 24 h. The sections were then deparaffinized, dehydrated with xylol and ethanol, and immersed in 0.1 M citrate buffer, pH 6, under microwave heating, for 18 min, for antigen recovery. After cooling at room temperature for 20 min, the sections were washed with PBS, followed by a 15-min blockade of endogenous peroxidase with a 3% H2O2 solution. The sections were incubated overnight (4°C) with rabbit primary antibodies (anti-TNF-α or anti-iNOS, respectively) as 1:200 or 1:400 dilutions in PBS-BSA. On the next day, the sections were washed in PBS and incubated for 30 min with the secondary biotinylated rabbit antibody (anti-IgG) at 1:200 dilution in PBS-BSA. After washing in PBS, the sections were incubated for 30 min with the conjugated streptavidin peroxidase complex (ABC Vectastain® complex, Vector Laboratories, USA). After another washing with PBS, the sections were stained with 3,3’diaminobenzidine-peroxide (DAB) cromophore, counter-stained with Mayer hematoxylin, dehydrated, and mounted on microscope slides for analysis. Some sections from all groups were used for standard HE staining as well.
Data are reported as means ± SEM for 8 animals per group. Statistical analyses were carried out using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), followed by the Student-Newman-Keuls post hoc test for multiple comparisons. P values < 0.05 were considered to be statistically significant.
Effect of lovastatin on paw edema induced by carrageenan in rats
The effects of orally administered lovastatin on paw edema induced by carrageenan are shown in Figure 1. Subcutaneous administration of 1% carrageenan induced edema formation by the 3rd and 4th hours. Lovastatin at the tested doses of 2 and 5 mg/kg exhibited a dose-related effect against carrageenan-induced inflammation, as compared to the vehicle group (controls) during the same period of time. However, at the higher dose of 10 mg/kg, no further decrease in edema volume was observed, indicating that the maximum effect had been reached. At the 4th hour, inhibition was 25, 43, and 37% for the doses of 2, 5, and 10 mg/kg, respectively. Indomethacin (20 mg/kg), used as the positive control, inhibited (58%) carrageenan-induced edema during the same period of time, as compared to controls.
Effect of lovastatin on peritonitis induced by carrageenan in mice
The effects of orally administered lovastatin on carrageenan-induced peritonitis are shown in Figure 2. The intraperitoneal administration of 1% carrageenan provoked an intense leukocyte migration into the mouse peritoneal cavity, and lovastatin at the doses of 0.5, 1, and 5 mg/kg produced a dose-dependent inhibition of this effect of the order of 20, 45, and 80%, respectively. At the higher dose (5 mg/kg) the effect was similar to that observed with INDO (20 mg/kg, po), used as the reference drug. No further increases were observed at the dose of 10 mg/kg, po (data not shown).
Effect of lovastatin on the formalin test in mice
The effects of intraperitoneal administration of lovastatin on formalin nociception are shown in Figure 3A. Subcutaneous administration of 1% formalin to the mouse paw induced a typical behavior of paw suspension and licking. Lovastatin at the doses of 2, 5, and 10 mg/kg, po, significantly reduced the duration of licking the injected paw in both phases of the formalin test: 1st phase (51, 65, and 70%, respectively) and 2nd phase (73, 57, and 66%). Morphine (10 mg/kg, sc), used as a positive control, also produced a significant reduction in both phases (76 and 69%).
Effect of naloxone on the anti-nociceptive activity of lovastatin and morphine in the formalin test in mice
The effects of the oral administration of lovastatin (5 mg/kg) and subcutaneous morphine (10 mg/kg) after pre-treatment with the opioid antagonist naloxone (3 mg/kg, sc) are shown in Figure 3B. Naloxone significantly reversed the anti-nociceptive effects of morphine and lovastatin in the first phase of the test (related to nociception), indicating the involvement of the opioid system. The effect of naloxone + morphine in the second phase (related to inflammation) was not statistically significant.
Effects of lovastatin on the release of human neutrophil MPO stimulated with PMA
The effects of pre-incubation with lovastatin (0.01, 0.1 and 1 µg/mL) on MPO release from freshly isolated cells (2.5 x 106) stimulated with PMA (0.1 µg/mL) are shown in Figure 4. Lovastatin inhibited MPO release in a concentration-dependent manner by 23, 79, and 86% at the three concentrations tested, respectively. Indomethacin (35.7 µg/mL) used as a positive control inhibited MPO release by 93%.
HE staining and immunohistochemistry analyses for TNF-α and iNOS
Figure 5A shows the paw from a rat that did not receive carrageenan (sham control). It indicates the preservation of tissue architecture with collagen fibers and the presence of fibroblasts. Intense edema formation can be seen in Figure 5B (carrageenan-injected group, inflammation control), indicated by large white spaces and the disappearance of collagen fibers. Also, carrageenan injection induced leukocyte migration, mainly neutrophils. Edema reduction and tissue preservation were observed in the group that received carrageenan and was pretreated with lovastatin (inflammation lovastatin) at the dose of 5 mg/kg, po (Figure 5C). Collagen fibers presented only a slight destruction after carrageenan injection. Neutrophil infiltration was almost completely reduced by lovastatin treatment. Fibroblasts were also present in significant amounts.
As shown in Figure 5D, no staining was observed in the sample that did not receive the primary antibody (sham control). Intense immunostaining was observed in Figure 5E, indicating a large amount of iNOS activity in rats injected with carrageenan (inflammation control). In the group treated with lovastatin (5 mg/kg, po), the immunostaining for iNOS and neutrophil infiltration were markedly reduced (Figure 5F, inflammation lovastatin). Thus, we could assume an involvement of iNOS inhibition in the anti-inflammatory actions of lovastatin.
Intense immunostaining was also observed in Figure 5H, indicating activity and expression of TNF-α in the rats injected with carrageenan (inflammation control). TNF-α is a well-known pro-inflammatory cytokine involved in the mechanisms of carrageenan. Lovastatin (5 mg/kg, po) also significantly reduced the immunostaining for TNF-α, associated with the presence of TNF-α in tissue (Figure 5I). The sham control (Figure 5G) was the same as in Figure 5D.
[View larger version of this image (83 K JPG file)]
[View larger version of this image (85 K JPG file)]
[View larger version of this image (70 K JPG file)]
[View larger version of this image (85 K JPG file)]
[View larger version of this image (580 K JPG file)]
Statins inhibit the conversion of HMG-CoA to mevalonic acid, and also down-regulate the production of bioactive sterols derived from the cholesterol synthesis pathway. In vitro studies indicate that the suppression of these mediators is responsible, at least in part, for the anti-inflammatory actions of statins (20). The present results indicate that lovastatin has a potent anti-inflammatory activity since it inhibits carrageenan-induced peritonitis and paw edema. Although these findings are consistent with studies showing these effects of statins in many inflammation models, most of them were carried out with other statins, mainly simvastatin (21-23).
Although all of these reports point to the anti-inflammatory effects of statins, most of them focused on cardiovascular diseases and atherosclerosis (24,25). In addition, we demonstrated for the first time that lovastatin produced anti-nociception and reduced pain of both neurogenic and inflammatory origin, as assessed by the formalin test. Surprisingly, this effect of lovastatin, similar to that of morphine, was also reversed by naloxone, suggesting the involvement of the opioid system.
Carrageenan-induced inflammation in the rat paw is a model of acute edema formation and hyperalgesia extensively used in the development of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and selective COX-1 and COX-2 inhibitors. Edema formation is the result of interaction among various inflammatory mediators that increase vascular permeability and/or blood flow (26). Carrageenan-induced edema has been described as a biphasic event. The early phase, observed about 1 h after carrageenan injection, is related to the production of serotonin, histamine, bradykinin, and cyclooxygenase products, while the late phase is due to neutrophil infiltration, as well as to the continuing production of arachidonic acid metabolites (27). Our data agree with others obtained in studies using another statin, simvastatin (28), which significantly reduced the edema extension when orally administered to mice 1 h before carrageenan injection, effects that were similar to those observed in the present study with indomethacin. Recently (14), histological examination of paw lesions confirmed that simvastatin inhibits the acute inflammation induced by carrageenan. These investigators concluded that simvastatin reduced the polymorphonuclear leukocyte infiltration, dose-dependently and similarly to indomethacin.
Furthermore, we performed an MPO test in vitro, which confirmed that lovastatin exerts a potent anti-inflammatory action. This statin significantly inhibited MPO release. This result was probably associated with the reduction of pro-inflammatory cytokines and the production of adhesive molecules, which is a common pleiotropic effect related to the use of statins, including lovastatin (29,30). It has been assumed (31) that the anti-inflammatory effects of statins may be due to inhibition of leukocyte adhesion and their migration to sites of inflammation what may also have occurred under our experimental conditions.
The degree of inhibition of leukocyte migration exerted by lovastatin in our study was similar to that seen with indomethacin, used as reference drug, suggesting that lovastatin may interfere with some molecular pathways of the inflammatory process. Vascular cell walls produce large amounts of cytokines, particularly IL-6, which plays a positive role in the local inflammatory reaction by amplifying leukocyte accumulation (32). Therefore, our results indicate that alteration in cytokine production could contribute to the decrease in leukocyte recruitment caused by lovastatin.
This result might be associated with the inhibition of prostanoid production related to COX-2 and lovastatin may block COX-2 production by a mechanism of gene expression inhibition related to NF-κB. This agrees, at least in part, with our finding that lovastatin decreases the number of TNF-α- and iNOS-expressing cells in the carrageenan-induced paw edema. In addition, lovastatin demonstrated an efficient action in both phases of the formalin test. In the first phase, lovastatin anti-nociception was reversed by the opioid antagonist naloxone, indicating a possible participation of opioid receptors in the anti-nociceptive action of this statin. In the second phase, lovastatin provoked a marked reduction of nociceptive behaviors, a result agreeing with its anti-inflammatory actions.
Our study also demonstrates that lovastatin significantly reduces the paw edema formation induced by carrageenan. It has been reported (33) that NO produced by cNOS is involved in the development of inflammation at early times after carrageenan administration, and that NO produced by iNOS is involved in the maintenance of the inflammatory response at later times. These carrageenan-activated inflammatory cascades are related not only to the innate immunity but also to the generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) (34). Since inflammation is closely linked to the production of ROS, the molecular basis of the observed anti-inflammatory effects of statins may be related to their ability to block the production and/or activity of ROS (35). Therefore, the results of the present study indicate an anti-inflammatory effect of lovastatin on the paw edema and leukocyte migration in peritoneal exudate induced by carrageenan, inhibition of MPO release from in vitro human neutrophils, and an anti-nociceptive action in the formalin test. Other studies have shown that statins, such as atorvastatin, prevented hypernociception (36) dependent on cytokine inhibition and prostanoid production. However, the present study is the first report of the reversal of lovastatin anti-nociception by naloxone.
Furthermore, atorvastatin was recently shown to be even more effective than diclofenac in decreasing joint inflammation and hyperalgesia in a rat model of arthritis (37), and in reducing TNF-α production in lipopolysaccharide-activated monocytes from diabetic patients (38). Another statin, simvastatin, was reported to prevent the increase of iNOS concentration after ischemia/reperfusion injury in the rat liver (39). In our case as well as in those studies, these effects of lovastatin were mediated, at least in part, by the reduction of cytokines such as TNF-α, and by the decrease of iNOS production. Besides being involved in inflammatory processes, iNOS has also been implicated in neuropathic pain (39). Kappa-opioid agonists have been shown to be powerful anti-inflammatory drugs (40). Nevertheless, new studies must be carried out in order to determine in more detail the beneficial actions of lovastatin and other statins regarding the reduction of pro-inflammatory mediators.
1. Almuti K, Rimawi R, Spevack D, Ostfeld RJ. Effects of statins beyond lipid lowering: potential for clinical benefits. Int J Cardiol 2006; 109: 7-15. [ Links ]
2. McTaggart F, Buckett L, Davidson R, Holdgate G, McCormick A, Schneck D, et al. Preclinical and clinical pharmacology of Rosuvastatin, a new 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitor. Am J Cardiol 2001; 87: 28B-32B. [ Links ]
3. Campo VL, Carvalho I. Estatinas hipolipêmicas e novas tendências terapêuticas. Quim Nova 2007; 30: 425-430. [ Links ]
4. Liao JK, Laufs U. Pleiotropic effects of statins. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol 2005; 45: 89-118. [ Links ]
5. Kleemann R, Princen HM, Emeis JJ, Jukema JW, Fontijn RD, Horrevoets AJ, et al. Rosuvastatin reduces atherosclerosis development beyond and independent of its plasma cholesterol-lowering effect in APOE*3-Leiden transgenic mice: evidence for antiinflammatory effects of rosuvastatin. Circulation 2003; 108: 1368-1374. [ Links ]
6. Nissen SE, Tuzcu EM, Schoenhagen P, Crowe T, Sasiela WJ, Tsai J, et al. Statin therapy, LDL cholesterol, C-reactive protein, and coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med 2005; 352: 29-38. [ Links ]
7. Puddu P, Puddu GM, Muscari A. HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors: Is the endothelium the main target? Cardiology 2001; 95: 9-13. [ Links ]
8. Degraeve F, Bolla M, Blaie S, Creminon C, Quere I, Boquet P, et al. Modulation of COX-2 expression by statins in human aortic smooth muscle cells. Involvement of geranylgeranylated proteins. J Biol Chem 2001; 276: 46849-46855. [ Links ]
9. Rikitake Y, Kawashima S, Takeshita S, Yamashita T, Azumi H, Yasuhara M, et al. Anti-oxidative properties of fluvastatin, an HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor, contribute to prevention of atherosclerosis in cholesterol-fed rabbits. Atherosclerosis 2001; 154: 87-96. [ Links ]
10. Kirsch C, Eckert GP, Koudinov AR, Muller WE. Brain cholesterol, statins and Alzheimer’s disease. Pharmacopsychiatry 2003; 36 (Suppl 2): S113-S119.
11. Diomede L, Albani D, Sottocorno M, Donati MB, Bianchi M, Fruscella P, et al. In vivo anti-inflammatory effect of statins is mediated by nonsterol mevalonate products. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2001; 21: 1327-1332. [ Links ]
12. Waehre T, Damas JK, Gullestad L, Holm AM, Pedersen TR, Arnesen KE, et al. Hydroxymethylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitors down-regulate chemokines and chemokine receptors in patients with coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 2003; 41: 1460-1467. [ Links ]
13. Rashtchizadeh N, Argani H, Ghorbanihaghjo A, Nezami N, Safa J, Montazer-Saheb S. C-reactive protein level following treatment and withdrawal of lovastatin in diabetic nephropathy. Iran J Kidney Dis 2009; 3: 93-98. [ Links ]
14. Nezic L, Skrbic R, Dobric S, Stojiljkovic MP, Jacevic V, Satara SS, et al. Simvastatin and indomethacin have similar anti-inflammatory activity in a rat model of acute local inflammation. Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol 2009; 104: 185-191. [ Links ]
15. Murakami M, Goto T, Saito Y, Goto S, Kochi M, Ushio Y. The inhibitory effect of simvastatin on growth in malignant gliomas - with special reference to its local application with fibrin glue spray in vivo. Int J Oncol 2001; 19: 525-531. [ Links ]
16. Cheng SM, Lai JH, Yang SP, Tsao TP, Ho LJ, Liou JT, et al. Modulation of human T cells signaling transduction by lovastatin. Int J Cardiol 2010; 140: 24-33. [ Links ]
17. Vinegar R, Truax JF, Selph JL. Some quantitative temporal characteristics of carrageenin-induced pleurisy in the rat. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med 1973; 143: 711-714. [ Links ]
18. Dubuisson D, Dennis SG. The formalin test: a quantitative study of the analgesic effects of morphine, meperidine, and brain stem stimulation in rats and cats. Pain 1977; 4: 161-174. [ Links ]
19. Lucisano YM, Mantovani B. Lysosomal enzyme release from polymorphonuclear leukocytes induced by immune complexes of IgM and of IgG. J Immunol 1984; 132: 2015-2020. [ Links ]
20. Eto M, Kozai T, Cosentino F, Joch H, Luscher TF. Statin prevents tissue factor expression in human endothelial cells: role of Rho/Rho-kinase and Akt pathways. Circulation 2002; 105: 1756-1759. [ Links ]
21. Nezic L, Skrbic R, Dobric S, Stojiljkovic MP, Satara SS, Milovanovic ZA, et al. Effect of simvastatin on proinflammatory cytokines production during lipopolysaccharide-induced inflammation in rats. Gen Physiol Biophys 2009; 28: 119-126. [ Links ]
22. Massaro M, Zampolli A, Scoditti E, Carluccio MA, Storelli C, Distante A, et al. Statins inhibit cyclooxygenase-2 and matrix metalloproteinase-9 in human endothelial cells: anti-angiogenic actions possibly contributing to plaque stability. Cardiovasc Res 2010; 86: 311-320. [ Links ]
23. Dantas AC, Batista-Júnior FF, Macedo LF, Mendes MN, Azevedo IM, Medeiros AC. Protective effect of simvastatin in the cyclophosphamide-induced hemorrhagic cystitis in rats. Acta Cir Bras 2010; 25: 43-46. [ Links ]
24. Bonnet J, McPherson R, Tedgui A, Simoneau D, Nozza A, Martineau P, et al. Comparative effects of 10-mg versus 80-mg Atorvastatin on high-sensitivity C-reactive protein in patients with stable coronary artery disease: results of the CAP (Comparative Atorvastatin Pleiotropic effects) study. Clin Ther 2008; 30: 2298-2313. [ Links ]
25. Nahrendorf M, Sosnovik D, Chen JW, Panizzi P, Figueiredo JL, Aikawa E, et al. Activatable magnetic resonance imaging agent reports myeloperoxidase activity in healing infarcts and noninvasively detects the antiinflammatory effects of atorvastatin on ischemia-reperfusion injury. Circulation 2008; 117: 1153-1160. [ Links ]
26. Sautebin L, Ialenti A, Ianaro A, Di Rosa M. Endogenous nitric oxide increases prostaglandin biosynthesis in carrageenin rat paw oedema. Eur J Pharmacol 1995; 286: 219-222. [ Links ]
27. Salvemini D, Wang ZQ, Wyatt PS, Bourdon DM, Marino MH, Manning PT, et al. Nitric oxide: a key mediator in the early and late phase of carrageenan-induced rat paw inflammation. Br J Pharmacol 1996; 118: 829-838. [ Links ]
28. Sparrow CP, Burton CA, Hernandez M, Mundt S, Hassing H, Patel S, et al. Simvastatin has anti-inflammatory and antiatherosclerotic activities independent of plasma cholesterol lowering. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2001; 21: 115-121. [ Links ]
29. Li Q, Verma IM. NF-kappaB regulation in the immune system. Nat Rev Immunol 2002; 2: 725-734. [ Links ]
30. Wu KK. Control of cyclooxygenase-2 transcriptional activation by pro-inflammatory mediators. Prostaglandins Leukot Essent Fatty Acids 2005; 72: 89-93. [ Links ]
31. Rydgren T, Vaarala O, Sandler S. Simvastatin protects against multiple low-dose streptozotocin-induced type 1 diabetes in CD-1 mice and recurrence of disease in nonobese diabetic mice. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 2007; 323: 180-185. [ Links ]
32. Mantovani A, Bussolino F, Introna M. Cytokine regulation of endothelial cell function: from molecular level to the bedside. Immunol Today 1997; 18: 231-240. [ Links ]
33. Borthakur A, Bhattacharyya S, Dudeja PK, Tobacman JK. Carrageenan induces interleukin-8 production through distinct Bcl10 pathway in normal human colonic epithelial cells. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 2007; 292: G829-G838. [ Links ]
34. Stoll LL, McCormick ML, Denning GM, Weintraub NL. Antioxidant effects of statins. Drugs Today 2004; 40: 975-990. [ Links ]
35. Santodomingo-Garzon T, Cunha TM, Verri WA Jr, Valerio DA, Parada CA, Poole S, et al. Atorvastatin inhibits inflammatory hypernociception. Br J Pharmacol 2006; 149: 14-22. [ Links ]
36. Wahane VD, Kumar VL. Atorvastatin ameliorates inflammatory hyperalgesia in rat model of monoarticular arthritis. Pharmacol Res 2010; 61: 329-333. [ Links ]
37. Mandosi E, Fallarino M, Gatti A, Carnovale A, Rossetti M, Lococo E, et al. Atorvastatin downregulates monocyte CD36 expression, nuclear NFkappaB and TNFalpha levels in type 2 diabetes. J Atheroscler Thromb 2010; 17: 539-545. [ Links ]
38. Trocha M, Merwid-Lad A, Szuba A, Chlebda E, Piesniewska M, Sozanski T, et al. Effect of simvastatin on nitric oxide synthases (eNOS, iNOS) and arginine and its derivatives (ADMA, SDMA) in ischemia/reperfusion injury in rat liver. Pharmacol Rep 2010; 62: 343-351. [ Links ]
39. Bonnefous C, Payne JE, Roppe J, Zhuang H, Chen X, Symons KT, et al. Discovery of inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) inhibitor development candidate KD7332, part 1: Identification of a novel, potent, and selective series of quinolinone iNOS dimerization inhibitors that are orally active in rodent pain models. J Med Chem 2009; 52: 3047-3062. [ Links ]
40. Walker JS. Anti-inflammatory effects of opioids. Adv Exp Med Biol 2003; 521: 148-160. [ Links ]
The technical assistance of Xênia Maria de Souza Rodrigues and Ivna Ângela Fernandes and the orthographic revision of Professor M.O.L. Viana are gratefully acknowledged. Research supported by CNPq and CAPES.
Address for correspondence: G.S.B. Viana, Departamento de Fisiologia e Farmacologia, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade Federal do Ceará, 60020-181 Fortaleza, CE, Brasil. E-mail: email@example.com
Received July 17, 2010. Accepted December 20, 2010. Available online January 14, 2011. Published February 7, 2011.
The Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research is partially financed by