SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.34 issue3Chemical composition and antioxidant activity of jatobá-do-cerrado (Hymenaea stigonocarpa Mart.) flourPhysicochemical, microbiological and sensory evaluation of a bioactive food blend author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

  • English (pdf)
  • Article in xml format
  • How to cite this article
  • SciELO Analytics
  • Curriculum ScienTI
  • Automatic translation

Indicators

Related links

Share


Food Science and Technology

On-line version ISSN 1678-457X

Food Sci. Technol (Campinas) vol.34 no.3 Campinas July/Sept. 2014

http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1678-457x.6422 

RESEARCH PAPER

 

Molecular screening of bovine raw milk for the presence of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) on dairy farms

 

 

Tatiane VendraminI; Débora Mara KichI; Rachel Dias MolinaI; Claucia Fernanda Volken de SouzaII; Rosangela Uhrig SalvatoriI; Adriane PozzobonI; Ivan Cunha Bustamante-filhoI, *

ICenter of Biological and Health Sciences, Univates, Lajeado, RS, Brazil, e-mail: ivanbustamante@univates.br
IICenter of Science and Technology, Univates, Lajeado, RS, Brazil

 

 


ABSTRACT

Milkborne transmission of Shiga toxin- producing Escherichia coli (STEC) has raised considerable concern due to recent outbreaks worldwide and poses a threat to public health. The aim of this study was to develop a sensitive and specific multiplex PCR assay to detect the presence of STEC in bovine raw milk. To identify E. coli (ATCC 25922) contamination, the gene uspA was used, and PCR sensitivity and specificity were accessed by testing diluted samples ranging from 2 to 2.0 × 106 CFU/mL. To detect STEC, the stx1 and stx2 genes were selected as targets. After reaction standardization, the multiplex assay was tested in raw milk collected from 101 cows on dairy farms. PCR assay for E. coli detection had a specificity of 100% and sensitivity of 79% (P<0.0001), with a lower detection limit of 2 CFU/mL. Multiplex PCR assay had 100% sensitivity for E. coli positive raw milk samples, and 31.1% were contaminated with STEC, 28.3% of stx2, and 1.9% of stx1. The multiplex PCR assay described in the present study can be employed to identify and screen E. coli harboring stx1 and stx2 genes in raw milk on dairy farms and in industries.

Keywords: shiga-toxin; cattle; multiplex PCR; milk.


 

 

1 Introduction

Escherichia coli is a Gram-negative, nonsporulating, rod shaped, flagellated, and facultative anaerobic bacteria belonging to the Enterobacteriaceae Family. Based on its virulence, this species is classified as enterotoxigenic E. coli (ETEC), enteropathogenic E. coli (EPEC), enterohemorrhagic E. coli (EHEC), attaching and effacing E. coli (AEEC), and Shiga toxin-producing E. coli (STEC) (Bavaro, 2012).

The Shiga toxin-producing E. coli are an important emerging group of foodborne pathogens. These strains harbor the phage-encoded genes stx1 and stx2, coding for cytotoxins that cause severe tissue damage, specially STX2 that cause a variety of human illnesses ranging from diarrhea to hemorrhagic colitis (HC), thrombotic thrombocytopenia purpurea (TTP), and hemolytic uremic syndrome (HUS) with fatal consequences (Gyles, 2007; Petruzziello-Pellegrini & Marsden, 2012; Walker et al., 2012). In Brazil, in a prospective clinical, observational, multicenter, non-controlled and non-randomized study, conducted between 2001 and 2005, 92.3% of patients with HUS were infected by STEC. These infected patients' ages ranged from 8 months to 6 years and 3 months, with an average age of 2 years and 5 months. However, almost half of these patients (46%) were less than 2 years old. These results show a higher risk for pediatric patients, also common victims of foodborne illnesses (Souza et al., 2011).

Ruminants, especially bovines, are the principal reservoir of STEC, and human contamination is often associated with consumption ground beef and direct contact with the animals or their environment (Savoye et al., 2011) STEC strains are highly pathogenic to human in low infectious doses, causing food-borne diseases through consumption of contaminated water or food (Dweik et al., 2012). Bovine milk and other dairy products such as yogurt and cheese have been associated with diseases caused by STEC (Chapman et al., 1993; Prandel et al., 2008; Martin & Beutin, 2011). Outbreaks of milk-borne diseases associated with STEC, including pasteurized dairy products, have been reported worldwide emphasizing the importance of STEC control for public health (Morgan et al., 1993; Upton & Coia, 1994; Seghal et al., 2008).

The identification of the presence of microorganisms in the food is the gold standard method to determine food poisoning sources. In most clinical laboratories, identification procedures are based on microbiological culture of milk and biochemical tests of the isolated bacteria. There are disadvantages associated with microbiological culture, such as: a milk culture may yield no bacteria from truly contaminated milk due to the presence of very low numbers of bacteria in the samples, and a negative culture may also be due to the presence of residual therapeutic antibiotics that may inhibit bacterial growth in vitro, more likely, sub lethally-injured or stressed bacteria may not grow directly on selective media, unless allowed to recover on selectively first (Riffon et al., 2001). The detection of STEC strains are labor-intensive, and the total time required for strain characterization is typically 72 h, involving methods such as cytotoxicity assays and Sorbitol MacConkey Agar platting. On the other hand, molecular methods are sensitive, specific, and rapid approaches for detection and characterization of microbiological contaminants in food.

The development of PCR-based methods for the detection of pathogens or virulence factors (Shahi et al., 2013; Branquinho & Ferreira, 2012; Gandra et al., 2011) can be used for the initial screening of the presence of microorganisms in samples of milk and dairy products. Furthermore, the present study, through direct isolation of bacterial DNA in milk samples, aimed to develop the multiplex PCR to assess the prevalence of E. coli and STEC in samples of fresh milk.

 

2 Materials and methods

2.1 Collection of raw milk samples

This study was carried out on three dairy farms located in Rio Grande do Sul State, Brazil. For the microbiological and molecular biology analyses, 15 mL of raw milk samples of 101 cows were collected. The milk was drawn by hand directly into sterile test tubes and transported to the laboratory in a cooler containing ice.

2.2 Microbiological analysis

To determine contamination of E. coli in milk, Brazilian federal normative (IN62) of the Ministry for Agriculture, Livestock and Supply was followed and used as the standard method (Brasil, 2003). Milk samples were cultured in Violet Red Bile agar (Oxoid Cambridge, UK) at 36°C for 24 h. From the samples that tested positive for E. coli, three colonies were transferred to Brilliant Green medium (Acumedia Lansing, USA) and incubated at 36°C for 48 h. One loopful of cultures presenting gas production was streaked onto a EC broth (Acumedia Lansing, USA) and incubated at 36°C for 48 h. The samples presenting gas formation were cultured at 36°C in Eosin Methylene Blue Agar (EMB, Oxoid Cambridge, UK.). After 24 h, E. coli colonies were counted with standard technique.

2.3 Preparation of template DNA

For DNA extraction, 200 µL of raw milk sample were used. Briefly, 20 µL of Tween-20 were added to the samples, followed by centrifugation (12000 x g, 15 min). Pellets were suspended in 60 µL extraction buffer (100 mM Tris-HCl, 100 mM EDTA, 250 mM NaCl, pH 8.0) (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA), 30 µL 10% SDS (Sigma-Aldrich, St Louis, MO, USA) , 15 µL proteinase K (Ambion®, Austin, TX, USA) (20 mg/mL), and 195 µL ultrapure water, and they were incubated for 1 h at 37°C. Subsequently, 100 µL of buffered phenol (ANRESCO, Solon, OH, USA) were added, and the samples were centrifuged (12000 x g, 5 min); the supernatant was collected and mixed with 100 µL of phenol-chloroform-isoamyl alcohol (25:24:1) (Sigma-Aldrich, St Louis, MO, USA) and centrifuged (12000 x g, 5 min). A total volume of 26.5 µL of 2M Sodium acetate (Sigma-Aldrich, St Louis, MO, USA) was added to the supernatant, followed by addition of 400 µL of absolute ethanol (Merck, Darmstadt, GER) and overnight incubation at 4°C. The samples were centrifuged (12000 x g, 20 min) and the pellets with DNA were ressuspended in TE buffer (10 mM Tris-HCL, 1 mM EDTA, pH 8,0), and stored at - 20°C until use. The optical density ratio (260/280 nm) of DNA preparations was considered suitable of downstream applications when greater than 1.6.

2.4 Molecular characterization of STEC in milk samples

A multiplex PCR was designed to determine the occurrence of E. coli harboring stx1 and/or stx2 virulence genes in the raw milk samples. Milk DNA samples were used as templates for PCR assays. All primers were from Invitrogen (Carlsbad, CA, USA), and the molecular biology reagents were from Biotools (Madrid, Spain). The names of specific primer sequences, predicted fragment size, and reaction concentrations are presented in Table 1. The uspAgene encoding the universal stress protein was used to detect E. coli DNA (Chen & Griffiths, 1998). To determine the presence of STEC, primers based on stx1 (Genebank accession number AB083043.1) and stx2 (Genebank accession number AB030484.1) genes were designed for this study. Multiplex PCR conditions were 1.75 mM MgCl2, 20 mM Tris-HCl, 50mM KCL (pH 8.4), 500 µM dNTPs, 1.5 U Taq DNA polymerase, and 100 ng of template DNA; 2% DMSO (Sigma-Aldrich, St Louis, MO, USA) was added to a total volume of 25 µL. Amplification reactions were carried out using Techne® TC-512 termocycler (Techne® Barloworld Scientific, Stone, Staffordshire, UK) as follows: 5 min at 94°C, 35 cycles each consisting of 2 min at 94°C, 1 min at 58°C, 1 min at 72°C, and a final extension step of 10 min at 72°C. Characterization of presence of E. coli producer of Shiga I and/or Shiga II toxins were performed by agarose (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA), gel electrophoresis stained with ethidium bromide (Sigma-Aldrich, St Louis, MO, USA). E. coli O157:H7 Edl 933 strain (kindly provided by Dr. Caroline de Nardi from Instituto Federal de São Paulo, Brazil) was used as positive control; PCR without template DNA and/or DNA polymerase was performed to be used as negative control.

To determine PCR sensitivity and specificity, sterile whole milk was artificially contaminated with 2 to 2.0 × 106 CFU/mL of E. coli (ATCC 25922) culture in stationary phase grown in brain heart infusion (BHI) broth (Sigma-Aldrich, St Louis, MO, USA) for 18-24 h at 36°C (Guido, 2003). The quantification was performed at this stage by plating on the depth of the microorganism suspensions of PCA (Plate Count Agar), followed by incubation at 36°C for 48 h. Dilution curves were repeated 8 times, and each point was analyzed in triplicate. DNA extraction and PCR were performed as described above.

2.5 Statistical analyses

All statistical analyses were performed using the Prism 5 (Graph Pad Software). The prevalence and frequency of contamination and sensitivity and specificity determination were accessed with exact 95% confidence interval (CI), Kruskal-Wallis test, Fisher's exact test and Chi-square; p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

 

3 Results and discussion

To validate the use of PCR to detect Escherichia coli contamination in raw milk, the sensitivity and specificity for the primers designed for the uspA gene were checked. The method was compared to microbiological analysis, which showed a total prevalence of contamination of raw milk by E. coli of 53.5% (against to 51.2% determined by PCR), with no difference (P = 0.3623) between the farms evaluated. However, the contamination level on farm C (60,508.8 ± 31,653.8) was higher (P < 0.0001) than that on farms A and B, 442.8 ± 261.27 and 106.6 ± 27.3, respectively (Figure 1).

 

 

100% specificity and 79% sensitivity were observed when PCR was performed with DNA obtained from milk artificially contaminated with 2 CFU/mL (P < 0.0001) (Table 2). When PCR was compared to microbiological analysis, 100% specificity (CI: 0.9328 to 1.000) was observed (P < 0.001); however, lower sensitivity (52.48%; CI: 0.4230 to 0.6251) was found. These results may be related to occurrence of samples with contamination less than 2.0 × 105 CFU/mL since the limit for 100% sensitivity was 2.0 × 106 CFU/mL.

The molecular characterization of STEC was accessed by means of multiplex PCR. The combination of the three sets of primers allowed the detection of the genes of interest as they produce different sized PCR specific products. Hence, after thorough trials (data not shown), the primer pairs to detect the stx1 and stx2 genes were found to be highly specific (Figure 2).

The multiplex assay detected that among all E. coli positive samples, 31.1% were contaminated with STEC. The stx2 fragment was found in 15 samples (28.3%), and stx1 in only one sample (1.9%), which was not stx2 positive. Environmental contaminations and poor herd and milking managements are important causes of reduction of milk quality. The high frequency of stx2 in faecal samples collected from buffalo, cows, and goats described elsewhere (Islam et al., 2008; Stephan et al., 2008; Bandyopadhyay et al., 2011, 2012) might explain the prevalence of stx2 positive STEC in raw milk. In humans, epidemiologic data suggest that E. coli O157 strains that express stx2 are more important than stx1 in the development of HUS, and that strains that express stx2 alone are more likely to be associated with the progression to HUS than strains that produce both stx1 and stx2 (Griffin, 1995)

In this study, the presence of STEC harboring the genes stx1 and stx2 in raw milk sample was detected. STEC harboring stx1 and stx2 genes were reported to be typical cattle colonizers (Brett et al., 2003; Vu-Khac & Cornick, 2008). Some authors have recently investigated 593 foodborne STEC strains for their serotypes and for nine virulence genes (stx1, stx1c, stx1d, stx2, stx2b, stx2e, stx2g, E-hlyand eae), and they observed a significant association of stx1and stx2 genes with bovine meat and milk products. These authors compared the properties of foodborne STEC with published data on faecal STEC from food producing animals, and found that virulence profiles and serotypes of STEC from food showed remarkable similarities to those of faecal STEC that were from the same animal species. Based on these results, it has been pointed out that food-producing animals represent the most important source for the entry of STEC in the food chain (Martin & Beutin, 2011).

It is noteworthy to mention the findings of Kumar et al. (2013), who showed the presence of pathogenic E. coli O157:H7 in pasteurized milk samples. These authors described a higher detection signal after enrichment, suggesting the presence of viable cells after pasteurization or post-pasteurization contamination. Therefore, fermented dairy products manufactured using raw milk contaminated with E. coli O157:H7, STEC, or other pathogenic strain can pose a threat to human health, demanding special attention of health and food agencies worldwide. Studies with emphasis on detection of pathogens and their virulence factors in food sources may be useful to prevent infection and development of associated diseases.

Our findings on raw milk contamination are meaningful and should be considered since even one Shiga toxin-producing E. coli in a food sample may lead to gastrointestinal or urogenital disorder due to their multiplication in the body or the food itself during storage in poor conditions (Gyles, 2007). Therefore, strict hygiene and management practices for dairy herd and milk processing and storage must be adopted to avoid unwanted illness due contaminated milk and milk products consumption.

 

4 Conclusion

This report presents a quick, sensitive, and specific method for molecular characterization of STEC. In addition, the screening for STEC in three dairy herds showed a significant prevalence of Shiga toxin-producing E. coli contamination in raw milk.

 

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful for the financial support provided by FUVATES.

 

References

Bandyopadhyay, S., Lodh C., Rahaman, H., Bhattacharya, D., Bera, A. K., Ahmed, F. A., Mahanti A., Samanta, I., Mondal, D. K., Bandyopadhyay, S., Sarkar, S., Dutta, T. K., Maity, S., Paul, V., Ghosh, M. K., Sarkar, M., & Baruah K. K. (2012). Characterization of shiga toxin producing (STEC) and enteropathogenic Escherichia coli (EPEC) in raw yak (Poephagusgrunniens) milk and milk products. Research in Veterinary Science, 93(2), 604-610. PMid:22226073. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rvsc.2011.12.011        [ Links ]

Bandyopadhyay, S., Mahanti, A., Samanta, I., Dutta, T. K., Ghosh, M. K., Bera, A. K., Bandyopadhyay, S., & Bhattacharya, D. (2011). Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli (ETEC) from diarrhoeic lambs of Arunachal Pradesh, India. Tropical Animal Health and Production, 43(3), 705-710. PMid:21104315. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11250-010-9757-1        [ Links ]

Bavaro, M. F. (2012). E. coli O157:H7 and other toxigenic strains: the curse of global food distribution. Current Gastroenterology Reports, 14(4), 317-323. PMid:22610457. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11894-012-0264-6        [ Links ]

Branquinho, M. R., & Ferreira, R. T. B., & Cardarelli-Leite, P. (2012). Use of real-time PCR to evaluate two DNA extraction methods from food. Food Science and Technology, 32(1), 112-118.         [ Links ]

Brasil. Ministério da Agricultura, Pecuária e Abastecimento. (2003). Oficializa os métodos analíticos oficiais para análises microbiológicas para controle de produtos de origem animal e água (Instrução Normativa nº 62, de 26 de agosto 2003). Diário Oficial da República Federativa do Brasil.         [ Links ]

Brett, K. N., Ramachandran, V., Hornitzky M. A., Bettelheim K. A., Walker M. J., & Djordjevic S. P. (2003). Stx1c is the most common Shiga toxin 1 subtype among Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli isolates from sheep but not among isolates from cattle. Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 41(3), 926-936. PMid:12624011 PMCid:PMC150265. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/JCM.41.3.926-936.2003        [ Links ]

Chapman, P. A., Wright, D. J., & Higgins R. (1993). Untreated milk as source of verotoxigenic Escherichia coli O157:H7. Veterinary Record, 133(7), 171-172. PMid:8236710. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/vr.133.7.171        [ Links ]

Chen, J., & Griffiths, M. W. (1998). PCR differentiation of Escherichia coli other Gram negative bacteria using primers derived from the nucleotide sequences flanking the gene encoding the universal stress protein. Letters in Applied Microbiology, 27(6), 369-371. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1472-765X.1998.00445.x        [ Links ]

Gandra, E. A., Fernandez, M. A., Silva, J. A., & Silva, W. P. (2011). Standardization of a multiplex PCR for the identification of coagulase-posivite Staphylococcus. Ciência e Tecnologia de Alimentos, 31(4), 946-949. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0101-20612011000400019        [ Links ]

Dweik, M., Stringer, R. C., Dastider, S. G., Wu, Y., Almasri, M., & Barizuddin, S. (2012). Specific and targeted detection of viable Escherichia coli O157:H7 using a sensitive and reusable impedance biosensor with dose and time response studies. Talanta, 94, 84-89. PMid:22608418. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2012.02.056        [ Links ]

Guido, M. C. (2003). Detecção de DNA de Brucella abortus pela PCR em leite bubalino experimentalmente contaminado pela amostra 1119-3 (Tese de doutorado). Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo.         [ Links ]

Griffin, P. M. (1995). Escherichia coli O157:H7 and other enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli. In M. J. Blaser, P. D. Smith, J. I. Rovin, H. B. Greenberg & R. L. Guerrant (Eds.), Infections of the gastrointestinal tract (pp. 739-761). New York: Raven Press.         [ Links ]

Gyles, C. L. (2007). Shigatoxin-producing Escherichia coli: an overview. Journal of Animal Science, 85(13), 45-62. PMid:17085726. http://dx.doi.org/10.2527/jas.2006-508        [ Links ]

Islam, M. A., Abdus , S. M., Boer, E., Rijkelt, R. B., Marcel, H. Z., Kaisar , A. T., & Heuvelink, A. E. (2008). Prevalence and genetic characterization of shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli isolates from slaughtered animals in Bangladesh. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 74(17), 5414-5421. PMid:18641151 PMCid:PMC2546655. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/AEM.00854-08        [ Links ]

Kumar, A., Grover S., & Batish V. K. (2013). Application of multiplex PCR assay based on uidR and fliCH7 genes for detection of Escherichia coli O157:H7 in milk. Journal of General and Applied Microbiology, 59(1), 11-19. PMid:23518514. http://dx.doi.org/10.2323/jgam.59.011        [ Links ]

Martin, A., & Beutin, L. (2011). Characteristics of shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli from meat and milk products of different origins and association with food producing animals as main contamination sources. International Journal of Food Microbiology, 146(1), 99-104. PMid:21371769. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2011.01.041        [ Links ]

Morgan, D., Newman, C. P., Hutchinson, D. N., Walkar, A. M., Rowe, B., & Majid, F. (1993). Verotoxin producing Escherichia coli O157:H7 infections associated with the consumption of yoghurt. Epidemiology and Infection, 111(2), 181-187. PMid:8405146 PMCid:PMC2271388. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0950268800056880        [ Links ]

Petruzziello-Pellegrini, T. N., & Marsden P. A. (2012). Shiga toxin-associated hemolytic uremic syndrome: advances in pathogenesis and therapeutics. Current Opinion in Nephrology and Hypertension, 21(4), 433-440. PMid:22660553. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MNH.0b013e328354a62e        [ Links ]

Prandel, N., Bertin Y., Martin C., & Livrelli V. (2008). Molecular analysis of shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli strains isolated from Hemolytic-Uremic Syndrome patients and dairy samples in France. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 74(7), 2118-2128. PMid:18245246 PMCid:PMC2292610. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/AEM.02688-07        [ Links ]

Riffon, R., Sayasith, K., Lhalil, H., Dubreuil, P., Drolet, M., & Lagace, J. (2001). Development of a rapid and sensitive test for identification of major pathogens in bovine mastitis by PCR. Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 39(7), 2584-2589. PMid:11427573 PMCid:PMC88189. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/JCM.39.7.2584-2589.2001        [ Links ]

Savoye, F., Feng, P., Rozand, C., Bouvier, M., Gleizal, A., & Thevenot, D. (2011). Comparative evaluation of a phage protein ligand assay with real-time PCR and a reference method for the detection of Escherichia coli O157:H7 in raw ground beef and trimmings. Journal of Food Protection, 74(1), 6-12. PMid:21219756. http://dx.doi.org/10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-10-271        [ Links ]

Seghal, R., Kumar, Y., & Kumar, S. (2008). Prevalence and geographical distribution of Escherichia coli O157 in India a 10 year survey. Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, 102(4), 380-383. PMid:18321544. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.trstmh.2008.01.015        [ Links ]

Shahi, S. K., Singhm V. K., & Kumar, A. (2013). Detection of Escherichia coli and associated β-lactamases genes from diabetic foot ulcers by multiplex PCR and molecular modeling and docking of SHV-1, TEM-1, and OXA-1 β-lactamases with clindamycin and piperacillin-tazobactam. PLoS One, 8(7), e68234. PMid:23861873 PMCid:PMC3701671. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0068234        [ Links ]

Souza, R. L., Carvalhaes J. T. A., Nishimura, L. S., Andrade, M. C., & Guth B. E. C. (2011). Hemolytic uremic syndrome in pediatric intensive care units in São Paulo, Brazil. Open Microbiology Journal, 5, 76-82. PMid:21804902 PMCid:PMC3143539. http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1874285801105010076        [ Links ]

Stephan, R., Schumacher, S., Corti, S., Krause, G., Danuser, J., & Beutin, L. (2008). Prevalence and characteristics of shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli in swiss raw milk cheeses collected at producer level. Journal of Dairy Science, 91(7), 2561-2565. PMid:18565913. http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.2008-1055        [ Links ]

Upton, P., & Coia, J. E. (1994). Prevalence and geographical distribution of Escherichia coli O157 in India a 10 year survey. Lancet, 344(8928), 1015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(94)91670-5        [ Links ]

Vu-Khac, H., & Cornick, N. A. (2008). Prevalence and genetic profiles of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli strains isolated from buffaloes, cattle, and goats in central. Veterinary Microbiology, 126(4), 356-363. PMid:17716835. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vetmic.2007.07.023        [ Links ]

Walker, C. L., Applegate, J. A., & Black, R. E. (2012). Haemolytic-uraemic syndrome as a sequela of diarrhoeal disease. Journal of Health, Population and Nutrition, 30(3), 257-261. http://dx.doi.org/10.3329/jhpn.v30i3.12288        [ Links ]

 

 

Received 25 June, 2014
Accepted 21 Aug., 2014 (006422)

 

 

* Corresponding author

Creative Commons License All the contents of this journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License