How to choose a suitable intraabdominal pressure level during single-incision laparoscopic surgery in children

Abstract

Laparoscopic surgery has become a common procedure in pediatric patients. However, adverse hemodynamic changes such as the increase of intraabdominal pressure (IAP) may occur laparoscopic surgery. The aim of this study is find a method to set a suitable IAP level in children before laparoscopic surgery. From Jan 2012 to Dec 2014, data were collected from a total of 1776 children needing laparoscopic high ligation of hernia sac. A retrospective data analysis was performed using a new defined variant Index A which had information of age, body mass index (BMI) and duration of pneumoperitoneum. The blood pressures (SBP and DBP) and the PaCO₂ were increased but SV showed no changes in patients after CO₂ insufflation. The complications were found in 32 cases including 2 cases with subcutaneous emphysemarelated to the CO₂ insufflation directly, 3 cases of respiratory infection, 5 cases of incision infection and 2 cases of urinary tract infection) and technique related. Furthermore, the risks of complications were negatively associated with the Index A. An IAP can be optimal set up in laparoscopic high ligation of hernia sac by using the Index A.

Keywords:
laparoscopic surgery; intraabdominal pressure; pneumoperitoneum; CO₂ insufflation pressure

1 Introduction

Nowadays, laparoscopic surgery has become a worldwide common daily-performed procedure in pediatric patients (Gupta & Singh, 2009). Being a minimal access procedure, it is usually assisted by a pneumoperitoneum, for which carbon dioxide (CO₂) insufflation is preferred by most laparoscopists because of its safety, cost and convenience (Tam, 2000). However, it has been also reported that laparoscopic surgery is associated with many clinical complications including gas embolism, cardiovascular compromise, and hypercapniain children (Chen et al., 1996; Bax & Van der Zee, 1999; Esposito et al., 2000). The pathophysiological disturbances induced by CO2 insufflation or pneumoperitoneum were reviewed in a previous study (Hackam & Rotstein, 1998).

A normal intraabdominal pressure (IAP) should be 5-7 mmHg in children (De Keulenaer et al., 2009). For laparoscopic procedure, IAP levels within 8-12 mmHg are acceptable for children older than one year (Mishchuk et al., 2016). Moreover, IAP level of 12 mmHg has been reported to be associated with decreased cardiac index and hypokinesis of left ventricular in children (Sakka et al., 2000). Some other factors such as duration of surgery, position of patients, etc. could lead to pathophysiological changes in the surgeries. In the present study, we tried to find an optimal IAP level which provided enough visual space and induced fewer complications in pediatric laparoscopic surgeries.

2 Methods

2.1 Laparoscopic surgery

This experiment was done in Nanfang Hospital of Southern Medical University which is one of the top three biggest medical centers in Guangdong Province, and has more than 2200 beds and about over 1000 outpatients daily. In our department, more than 800 paediatric laparoscopic surgeries including intestinal procedures, urological procedures, diaphragmatic hernia repair, appendectomy, and cholecystectomy, have been performed by paediatric surgeons yearly. From Jan 2012 to Dec 2014, the patients (0.9-12 years old) treated with laparoscopic high ligation of hernia sac were recruited in this study.

All patients were positioned supine, often in the Trendelenberg position. In addition, they had no diagnosed cardiovascular and pulmonary disease before laparoscopic surgery. The systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), stroke volume (SV) and arterial partial pressure of CO₂ (PaCO₂) were recorded every 10 min from the baseline (T0), which was defined as a time point (TP) five minu before CO₂ insufflation. T1 (5 min after insufflations), T2 (15 min after insufflation), T3 (end of insufflation) were also recorded (Table 1).

Table 1
The data collection plan in the laparoscopic operation.

TP	T0	T1	T2	T3
Timeline	5 minutes before insufflation (Baseline)	5 minutes after insufflation	15 minutes after insufflation	End of Insufflation
BP	x	x	x	x
PaCO2	x	x	x	x
SV	x	x	x	x

Furthermore, the complications were defined as all adverse effects related to pneumoperitoneum or operation in 30 d during or after operation, such as carbon dioxide embolism, barotraumas, respiratory acidosis, hypertension, hypotension, arrhythmias, hypercapnia (or hypoxemia), deep venous thrombosis (DVT), subcutaneous emphysema, etc. The risk factors that could increase or decrease the risk of adverse effects of pneumoperitoneum possibly were also recorded and considered as covariant in the statistical model.

2.2 Logistic analysis

In the present study, logistic analysis was performed to explore the relative risk (RR) of various IAP specified by an Index A, which was calculated as a ratio between duration of pneumoperitoneum (min), age (year) and BMI of patients (Index A=Age*BMI/duration). The duration of pneumoperitoneum would be expressed using rounding value, such as 30 min, 40 min, 50 min, 60 mi and 70 min. The index A was grouped under three categories (1: 1.0-2.5, 2: 2.6-3.9, 3: 4.0-5.9) to make sure that no big difference in patients’ number between each category. The IAP was classified into five groups according to their pressure values including 6.0-7.9 mmHg (group 1), 8.0-9.9 mmHg (group 2), 10.0-10.9 mmHg (group 3), 11.0-11.9 mmHg (group 4), and 12.0-12.9mmHg (group 5). The significant level was set at 0.05. All the statistical analysis was performed with Statistical Analysis Software Version 9.3 (SAS, SAS Institute Inc., NC, USA).

3 Results

3.1 Baseline characteristics of patients

In the present study, the data of a total of 1776 children such as age, BMI, duration of pneumoperitoneum, Index A and complications were collected. As shown in Table 2, the age of children was ranged from 0.9 to 12.0 years (6.59 ± 2.41), and the BMI was between 14.81 and 27.98 (19.43 ± 7.34). The shortest duration of pneumoperitoneum was 34 min while the longest one was 67 min. The Index A was ranged from 1.3 to 5.8 (3.72 ± 1.28).

Table 2
Baseline characteristics of study patients.

N	1776
Age (years)	0.9-12.0
BMI	14.81-27.98
Duration of pneumoperitoneum (minutes)	34-67
IAP (mmHg)	6-12
Index A	1.3-5.8
Complications	32

• N: the total sample of collected patients in the present study.

3.2 Changes of blood pressures of patients, the PaCO₂ and SV in patients during the operation

The blood pressures of patients (SBP and DBP), the PaCO₂ and SV were measured during the operation at stages of T0, T1,T2, T3. It was suggested that, compared to T0, the blood pressures of patients (SBP and DBP) and the PaCO₂ increased after CO₂ insufflation in T1, T2 and T3 during the surgery (P < 0.05). Most of them had been statistical significant elevated from the baseline measured value. However, the SV decreased a little after CO₂ insufflation but there was differce between T0 and T1, T2, T3 (P > 0.05) (Table 3).

Table 3
Descriptive analysis of blood pressure, PaCO₂ and SV during the operation.

	T0	T1	T2	T3
SBP (mmHg)	93.00 ± 6.89	127.00 ± 7.65*	132.00 ± 7.14*	131.50 ± 6.89*
DBP (mmHg)	69.50 ± 2.81	83.00 ± 3.57*	83.00 ± 4.08*	72.50 ± 2.30
PaCO2 (mmHg)	36.25 ± 3.48	38.66 ± 3.79	40.02 ± 3.52*	40.13 ± 3.26*
SV (mL)	22.00 ± 1.53	20.00 ± 1.53	20.50 ± 1.68	20.40 ± 1.79

• ^*
  Statistical significant different from T0 value.

3.3 Complications of patients

Overall, a total of 32 adverse effects were detected in this study and the percentage of complications was 1.8%. The distribution of them was shown in Table 4. It was found that, based on IAP classification, among 32 complications, 6 (1.3%), 6 (1.3%), 5 (1.7%), 7 (2.3%) 8 (2.9%) blonged to group 1, group 2, group 3, group 4, and group 5, respectively. In addition, it ranged from 1.0% to 4.7% by varied IAP and Index A (Table 4). An interesting finding in the present study was that there were only two adverse effects (subcutaneous emphysema) related to the CO₂ insufflation directly. Most of the complications were postoperative infection (3 cases of respiratory infection, 5 cases of incision infection and 2 cases of urinary tract infection) and technique related.

Table 4
Descriptive analysis of complications among 1776 patients.

IAP	1		2		3		4		5		Total
Index A	n (%)	N	n (%)	N	n (%)	N	n (%)	N	n (%)	N	n (%)	N
1	2(1.3%)	152	2(1.3%)	150	3(3.4%)	89	3(3.2%)	94	4(4.7%)	86	14(2.5%)	571
2	2(1.4%)	147	2(1.3%)	154	1(1.0%)	98	2(2.0%)	101	2(2.2%)	91	9 (1.5%)	591
3	2(1.2%)	161	2(1.4%)	142	1(1.0%)	105	2(1.8%)	109	2(2.1%)	97	9 (1.5%)	614
Total	6(1.3%)	460	6(1.3%)	446	5(1.7%)	292	7(2.3%)	304	8(2.9%)	274	32(1.8%)	1776

• N: amount of patients in subgroup; n: the number of complication in subgroup.

3.4 Results of logistic regression analysis

Univariate logistic regression analyses were performed to estimate relative risks of complications between IAP groups specified by Index A. As demonstrated in Table 5, the risk of complication seemed to have no changes for IAP at 8 and 9 mmHg. However, when IAP was more than 10 mmHg, a tendency could be observed that the risk ratio (RR) elevated with the increase of IAP. Particularly, when Index A was between 1.0 and 2.5, the patients had increased risks of 1.62, 1.46 and 2.74 for IAP groups at 10 mmHg, 11 mmHg and 12 mmHg, respectively.

Table 5
Relative risks (RR) of complications.

IAP	Group	2	3	4	5
		RR (95% CI)	RR (95% CI)	RR (95% CI)	RR (95% CI)
Index A	1	1.00 (0.82-3.42)	2.62 (1.24-5.05)	2.46 (1.04-5.89)	3.74 (1.55-5.17)
	2	0.96 (0.47-2.37)	0.77 (0.11-2.66)	1.43 (0.88-6.24)	1.57 (0.87-6.99)
	3	1.17 (0.61-4.39)	0.83 (0.41-3.52)	1.46 (0.92-6.05)	1.75 (0.90-6.72)

• Bold means statistical significant. RR(95%CI): Relative risk and its 95% confidence interval.

The results also showed that the smaller Index A was, the higher the risk of clinical complication was, especially when the IAP was higher. Nevertheless, the risk of complication seemed to be the same when IAP value was less than 9 mmHg. Furthermore, when Index A was not less than 2.6, the risk of complication seemed to be the same as well (Table 5).

4 Discussion

The present research was a data analysis based on 1776 children’s record of laparoscopic surgical procedures to study the association between IAP and adverse effects of CO₂ pneumoperitoneum, trying to find a method to estimate the safe IAP before pneumoperitoneum to decrease risk of complications.

As we know, a higher intraabdominal pressure (IAP) would contribute to better visualization of the anatomical structures and better manipulation of instruments. However, it could also lead to lots of pathophysiological changes on hosts, like respiratory changes, cardiovascular changes. Just as observed in our study, apart from the SV, the blood pressure and PaCO₂ were increased in CO₂ insufflated patients compared to pre-CO₂ insufflated patients and the differences between pre- CO₂ insufflation group and post- CO₂ insufflation groups were statistically significant. The SV was reported to be decreased by laparoscopic surgery (Wahba et al., 1995). Some further studies showed that the SV had a more considerable decrease in the 15 mmHg group and no significant hemodynamic change was observed in 10 mmHg or 7 mmHg group (Dexter et al., 1999; Perry et al., 2003). In this study, a significant hemodynamic change in blood pressure and PaCO₂ was also observed in five IAP groups but no changes in SV was detected in five groups (p > 0.05).

According to the results, pathophysiological changes were unavoidable by the pneumoperitoneum in every level of IAP and happened instantly after CO₂ insufflation. However, the clinical complications could be unlikely observed in each patient. An interesting finding in the present study was that there were only two adverse effects (subcutaneous emphysema) related to the CO₂ insufflation directly. In addition to those two cases associated directly with pneumoperitoneum, many postoperative infections might be pneumoperitoneum related because of immunologic depress induced by CO₂ insufflation (Ellström et al., 1996; Redmond et al., 1994; Lippert et al., 2002).

In the present study, the Index A was designed as a new covariate, including the information on the factors that could increase or decrease the risks of adverse effects for pneumoperitoneum. Patient positioning might affect pathophysiological changes of human beings as well (Joris et al., 1993; Kelman et al., 1972). However, it is difficult to quantize the clinical impact of varied position (Trendelenburg and reverse Trendelenburg position), so only the patients with Trendelenburg were recruited. According to the definition, the duration has a negative association with Index A and the longer time the pneumoperitoneum takes, the smaller the Index A is. Compared with the control group, those three significantly elevated RRs were only found in the group 1 of Index A (1.0-2.5). These results provided some suggestions with good clinical practice meaning, that a suitable IAP level could be chosen according to Index A values. If Index A is more than 2.6, there is no worry about a complication by each IAP level for children. When Index A is less than 2.6, the risks of complications will be increased and the IAP level should be lower. The index A is negatively related to the risks of complications in patients. Although it seems easy to choose IAP level according to the Index A, there is still a problem to calculate the Index A before operation since the duration is unknown before the operation. Surgeon should estimate the duration of CO₂ insufflation according to his/her experience before laparoscopic operation. Another issue, which seemed to be limitation of the study, is the consistence in patients and surgeons. There were two attending surgeon in the studies, and we believe they do do the operations in the same level and it will not lead to problem drawing conclusions.

It is first time to define an Index A used to choose an optimal IAP level before laparoscopic operation among children with high ligation of hernia sac, which will make the laparoscopic surgeries much more safety. Although it is just simple index, we hope other collegers in the world could do more works making it more practise in future.

Acknowledgements

The present study was initiated and sponsored by the Dean fund of Nanfang Hospital, the Southern Medical University, China (No. H2015002).

• Practical Application: Control of an intraabdominal pressure in laparoscopic high ligation of hernia sac using the Index A.

References

• Bax, N. M., & Van der Zee, D. C. (1999). Complications in laparoscopic surgery in children. In N. M. Bax, K. E. Georgeson, A. Najmaldin & J. S. Valla (Eds.), Endoscopic surgery in children (pp. 57-68). Berlin: Springer-Verlag. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-59873-9_41
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-59873-9_41
• Chen, M. K., Schropp, K. P., & Lobe, T. E. (1996). Complications of minimal-access surgery in children. Journal of Pediatric Surgery, 31(8), 1161-1165. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3468(96)90109-8 PMid:8863256.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3468(96)90109-8
• De Keulenaer, B. L., De Waele, J. J., Powell, B., & Malbrain, M. L. (2009). What is normal intra-abdominal pressure and how is it affected by positioning, body mass and positive end-expiratory pressure? Intensive Care Medicine, 35(6), 969-976. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00134-009-1445-0 PMid:19242675.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00134-009-1445-0
• Dexter, S. P. L., Vucevic, M., Gibson, J., & McMahon, M. J. (1999). Hemodynamic consequence of high- and low-pressure capnoperitoneum during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surgical Endoscopy, 13(4), 376-381. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s004649900993 PMid:10094751.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s004649900993
• Ellström, M., Bengtsson, A., Tylman, M., Haeger, M., Olsson, J. H., & Hahlin, M. (1996). Evaluation of tissue trauma after laparoscopic and abdominal hysterectomy: measurement of neutrophil activation and release of interleukin-6, cortisol and C-reactive protein. Journal of the American College of Surgeons, 182(5), 423-430. PMid:8620278.
• Esposito, C., Montupet, P., Amici, G., & Desruelle, P. (2000). Complications of laparoscopic antireflux surgery in childhood. Surgical Endoscopy, 14(7), 622-624. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s004640000143 PMid:10948297.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s004640000143
• Gupta, R., & Singh, S. (2009). Challenges in Paediatric Laparoscopic Surgeries. Indian Journal of Anaesthesia, 53(5), 560-566. PMid:20640106.
• Hackam, D. J., & Rotstein, O. D. (1998). Host response to laparoscopic surgery: mechanisms and clinical correlates. Canadian Journal of Surgery, 41(2), 103-111. PMid:9575992.
• Joris, J., Banache, M., Bonnet, F., Sessler, D. I., & Lamy, M. (1993). Clonidine and ketanserin both are effective treatment for postanesthetic shivering. Anesthesiology, 79(3), 532-539. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00000542-199309000-00017 PMid:8363079.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00000542-199309000-00017
• Kelman, G. R., Swappy, G. H., Smith, I., Benzie, R. J., & Gordon, N. L. M. (1972). Cardiac output and arterial blood-gas tension during laparoscopy. British Journal of Anaesthesia, 44(11), 1155-1162. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bja/44.11.1155 PMid:4265051.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bja/44.11.1155
• Lippert, H., Koch, A., Marusch, F., Wolff, S., & Gastinger, I. (2002). Open vs. laparoscopic appendectomy. Der Chirurg, 73(8), 791-798. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00104-002-0500-y PMid:12425155.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00104-002-0500-y
• Mishchuk, V., Lerchuk, O., Dvorakevych, A., & Khomyak, V. (2016). Features of respiratory support during laparoscopic correction of inguinal hernias in children. Videosurgery and Other Miniinvasive Techniques, 11(2), 55-59. http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/wiitm.2016.59837 PMid:27458483.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/wiitm.2016.59837
• Perry, Y., Reissman, P., Blumental, M., Lyass, S., & Pizov, R. (2003). Pressure related hemodynamic effects of CO₂ pneumoperitoneum in a model of acute cardiac failure. Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques Part A., 13(6), 341-347. http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/109264203322656388 PMid:14733695.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/109264203322656388
• Redmond, H. P., Watson, R. W., Houghton, T., Condron, C., Watson, R. G., & Bouchier-Hayes, D. (1994). Immune function in patients undergoing open vs laparoscopic cholecysterctomy. Archives of Surgery (ChicAug, Ill.), 129(12), 1240-1246. http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.1994.01420360030003 PMid:7986152.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.1994.01420360030003
• Sakka, S. G., Huettemann, E., Petrat, G., Meier-Hellmann, A., Schier, F., & Reinhart, K. (2000). Transoesophageal echocardiographic assessment of haemodynamic changes during laparoscopic herniorrhaphy in small children. British Journal of Anaesthesia, 84(3), 330-334. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.bja.a013434 PMid:10793591.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.bja.a013434
• Tam, P. K. H. (2000). Laparoscopic surgery in children. Archives of Disease in Childhood, 82(3), 240-243. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/adc.82.3.240 PMid:10685931.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/adc.82.3.240
• Wahba, R. W., Beique, F., & Kleiman, S. J. (1995). Cardiopulmonary function and laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia, 42(1), 51-63. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF03010572 PMid:7889585.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF03010572

Publication Dates

• Publication in this collection
  07 Aug 2020

History

• Received
  13 Mar 2020
• Accepted
  15 Apr 2020