SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.35 issue4Reviewing the Brazilian protocol for treatment of secondary hyperparathyroidismThe effect of hypoxia and reoxygenation in the response of mesangial cells to angiotensin II in vitro author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

  • text in Portuguese
  • English (pdf) | Portuguese (pdf)
  • Article in xml format
  • How to cite this article
  • SciELO Analytics
  • Curriculum ScienTI
  • Automatic translation

Indicators

Related links

Share


Brazilian Journal of Nephrology

Print version ISSN 0101-2800

J. Bras. Nefrol. vol.35 no.4 São Paulo Oct./Dec. 2013

http://dx.doi.org/10.5935/0101-2800.20130043 

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

 

Detection of podocyturia in patients with lupus nephritis

 

Amelia Rodrigues Pereira Sabino; Vicente de Paulo Castro Teixeira; Sonia Kiyomi Nishida; Nelson Sass; Juliana Busato Mansur; Gianna Mastroianni Kirsztajn

Federal University of São Paulo (UNIFESP)

Correspondence to

 

 


ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The podocyturia has been detected in glomerular diseases, such as lupus nephritis (LN), in which proteinuria is an important manifestation, and its occurrence seems to be limited to the active phase of the disease.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate podocyturia in LN patients, and the possible association with clinical disease activity.
METHODS: We evaluated 56 patients with LN, that were classified in three groups according to the degree of clinical activity: Group B, no activity (n = 17), Group C with mild (n = 29) and Group D, moderate to severe activity (n = 10). The control group was composed by 29 healthy subjects (Group A). The podocyturia was studied by indirect immunofluorescence using primary antibodies to podocyte: anti-podocin, nephrin and synaptopodin, and a secondary antibody conjugated with FITC. We also evaluated serum creatinine levels, urinary protein/creatinine (P/C) ratio, hematuria and leucocituria.
RESULTS: The podocyturia with anti-podocin and anti-sinaptopodin correlated statistically with the P/C ratio (p = 0.001 and p = 0.013, respectively). The podocyturia with anti-podocin, as well as the P/C ratio showed significant correlation (p < 0.001) with the degree of lupus disease activity, unlike the other two antibodies, anti-nephrin and anti-synaptopodin.
CONCLUSION: Our findings show that podocyturia with anti-podocin could be useful in monitoring disease activity in LN patients.

Keywords: glomerulonephritis, lupus nephritis, podocytes, proteinuria.


 

 

INTRODUCTION

Podocytes or visceral epithelial cells are highly specialized cells which line the urinary surface of the glomerular capillary tuft and, together with endothelial cells and the basement membrane, form the glomerular filtration barrier and provide for its selective permeability. After injury, podocytes may detach from the glomerular basement membrane and be excreted in urine; in this situation, they may still be viable, or have undergone apoptosis or necrosis.1

Animal experiments and clinical studies with glomerulopathy patients have shown that injury to podocytes plays a key role in the development of proteinuria.2 The presence of podocytes in urine has been described in many glomerular diseases, such as IgA nephropathy, diabetic nephropathy, membranous nephropathy, and lupus nephritis (LN),3,4 among others, reflecting the occurrence of glomerular injury.

One of the assays used to assess podocyturia is indirect immunofluorescence with specific antibodies directed against podocyte antigens in urinary sediments. The quantification of podocytes in the different stages of glomerular disease may contribute to the understanding of the condition's pathogenesis. Podocyturia tests may also be a practical means of monitoring patients with glomerulopathy. The noninvasive nature of the tests and the real-time data they provides on podocyte injury in the glomerulus yield potential applications in the assessment of glomerular disease clinical activity.

LN is one of the most severe clinical manifestations of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Studies have shown that podocyte injury occurs in the early stages of glomerular damage in LN,5 and that quantification of podocyturia could be used as a marker for active disease.6,7

This study aimed to analyze the use of immunofluorescence assays for podocyturia in patients with LN. This simple low cost technique requires commercially available podocyte-specific antibodies.

 

METHODS

THE SERIES

The study included patients followed up in the Glomerulopathy Clinic of the diagnosed with LN and SLE as per the criteria of the American College of Rheumatology.8

Patients with LN were divided into three groups according to the degree of disease activity: 17 (20.0%) had no active disease (Group B, 14 females and three males, mean age 41.4 years); 29 (34.1%) had mild disease (Group C, 22 females and seven males, mean age of 37.8 years); and 10 (11.8%) had moderate to severe disease (Group D, all females, mean age of 29.6 years). Twenty-nine (34.1%) healthy individuals without urinary disorders were enrolled in the the control group (Group A, 21 females and eight males, mean age of 40.7 years). They were selected based on negative urine test strip results.

Clinical and workup criteria were applied by an experienced physician in the area of lupus nephritis monitoring to grade disease activity (no active disease, mild disease, moderate to severe disease). Clinical criteria included signs and symptoms manifested in the patients and treatment with immunosuppressants; workup criteria included the results of tests routinely used to monitor patients with SLE in our service as described by Solorzano et al.9

PODOCYTURIA TESTING

Samples of midstream urine were collected in sterile vials and kept under refrigeration until the time of processing. Approximately 30 ml of urine were transferred to a tube and centrifuged at 2000 rpm for five minutes. After centrifugation, the supernatant was discarded and the sediment resuspended in 5 ml of 50% ethanol and washed with HDF (solution of ultra-pure water containing 137 mM NaCl, 5 mM KCl, 5.5 mM glucose, 4 mM NaHCO3, and 0.2% EDTA). Then, the material was submitted to cytocentrifugation on microscope slides with adhesive filter paper.

The prepared slides were fixed in 2% formaldehyde and 4% sucrose PBS at room temperature for 10 minutes. The slides were then washed in PBS for 5 minutes and treated with 0.3% Triton X-100 (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) for 10 minutes to increase the permeability of the material. Another washing cycle with PBS was performed for 5 minutes, and then the material was sent for incubation for one hour with blocking buffer solution (PBS with 0.2% BSA, 50 mM NH4Cl, and 1% goat serum). After another washing cycle, the slides were incubated for 16 hours at 4ºC with primary podocyte-specific antibodies: rabbit anti-podocin antibody (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO), rabbit anti-nephrin antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA), and rabbit anti-synaptopodin antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA). After washing, the slides were incubated with secondary antibody fluorescein-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG (FITC, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) for 45 minutes at room temperature. DAPI was used to stain nucleic acid. The slides were examined and photographed under 400x magnification using a DM1000 epifluorescence microscope (Leica Microsystems CMS GmbH, Wetzlar, Germany); positive and negative reaction controls were used in each procedure. The number of podocytes in 30 randomly chosen fields of the slides were counted and the results were corrected based on the levels of urine creatinine found in each sample.

LAB WORKUP

Creatinine and proteinuria levels were measured using a commercial kit and an Olympus AU 400 Analyzer (Olympus Mishima Co. Ltd., Shizuoka, Japan).

Hematuria and leukocyturia in urinary sediments were assessed based on the mean number of red and white blood cells in 10 fields.

Measurements of serum creatinine, 24-hour proteinuria, hematuria, and leukocyturia were made only for subjects in groups B, C, and D. Controls were not tested for these parameters.

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

The following inferential statistics analyses were used: Spearman's rank correlation coefficient, the Kruskal-Wallis test, and the Mann-Whitney U test. A level of significance of 5% was established for all tests.

 

RESULTS

The specificity of primary antibodies (rabbit anti-podocin antibody, rabbit anti-nephrin antibody, and rabbit anti-synaptopodin antibody) was confirmed by indirect immunofluorescence, using histological sections of normal human kidney tissue. When tested on slides with podocytes, the best results were obtained with the anti-podocin antibody, as it produced higher reactivity and lower nonspecific staining (Figure 1).

 

 

Podocyturia measurements by rabbit anti-podocin, anti-nephrin, and anti-synaptopodin antibodies are shown in Table 1.

Lab test results are shown in Table 2. In the control group, only protein/creatinine ratios and podocyturia were measured (Table 2), since these subjects were included in the study for having negative results in the urine test strip.

The diagnosis of podocyturia based on the anti-podocin antibody was correlated with active disease according to clinical and workup parameters, contrary to what was observed with the other two antibodies, anti-nephrin, and anti-synaptopodin, whose results did not correlate with disease severity.

Inferential results revealed that scores of podocyturia with anti-podocin (p < 0.001) and anti-nephrin (p = 0.047) antibodies were different in groups A, B, C, and D. The same was not observed for levels of podocyturia with the anti-synaptopodin (p = 0.107) antibody.

Protein/creatinine ratios (p < 0.001) and 24-hour proteinuria levels (p < 0.001) were not similar between groups. The results of multiple comparisons between groups are shown in Figures 2 and 3.

 

 

 

 

The possible correlations between variables were assessed using Spearman's rank correlation coefficient. Diagnoses of podocyturia with the anti-podocin and anti-synaptopodin antibodies were positively and statistically correlated with the protein/creatinine ratio (rs = 0.367, p = 0.001; and rs = 0.272, p = 0.013, respectively); diagnoses using the anti-nephrin and anti-synaptopodin antibodies were correlated with each other (rs = 0.317, p = 0.001); diagnosis of podocyturia using the anti-nephrin antibody was negatively and statistically correlated with 24-hour proteinuria (rs = -0.334, p = 0.022). The other possible correlations were not statistically significant.

 

DISCUSSION

Studies have described the presence of viable podocytes in the urine of patients with various glomerular diseases and proteinuria. Unlike proteinuria - present in active disease and in the chronic stages of glomerular injury - podocyturia seems to be present only in cases of active disease.6,10 Podocyturia is not an indicator for proteinuria,10 and could thus serve as a sensitive early marker of active glomerular injury and an indicator of great value in the definition of therapy.1 Indeed, the levels of podocyturia in healthy individuals and patients with inactive disease has been shown to be significantly lower than the levels seen in patients with active glomerular disease.11

In our study, the levels of leukocyturia, hematuria, serum creatinine, protein/creatinine ratio, and 24-hour proteinuria grew according to the degree of clinical activity, as also described by Solorzano et al.9 It was evident that the counts of podocin-positive and synaptopodin-positive cells in urine were significantly correlated with protein/creatinine ratios. In fact, a previous study carried out at our center9 found the protein/creatinine ratios of isolated urine samples were a good indicator of renal activity. This finding is of great importance, since this is a fast, easy-to-perform, low cost and well-established test in clinical practice. Solorzano et al.12 observed that the protein/creatinine ratio can also be used to monitor the degree of renal involvement in LN, as also found in our study.

The correlation of podocyturia with disease activity in patients with lupus nephritis suggested the anti-podocin antibody was the most suitable biomarker when compared with anti-nephrin and anti-synaptopodin. Garovic et al.13 reported similar results in the assessment of a group of pregnant women with preeclampsia. The authors analyzed the renal tissue of this group of patients and found reduced glomerular expression of nephrin and synaptopodin, while both the control group and the group with preeclampsia had strong labeling for podocin. According to these authors, the podocytes excreted in urine could have lower expression of nephrin and synaptopodin than podocin, thus making the latter a more sensitive marker for the presence of podocytes in urine.14

A similar finding was observed in a study on diabetic nephropathy, wherein the counts of podocyte-related molecules was correlated with severity of albuminuria.15

Gene expression of podocyte proteins (nephrin, podocin, synaptopodin, podocalyxin, among others) in renal tissue is reduced in different glomerulopathies including lupus nephritis. Increased urinary excretion of these markers has been observed due to detachment of podocytes from the glomerular basement membrane and/or apoptosis.16 Experimental studies have also described correlations between expression of nephrin and podocin and histological grade of lupus nephritis.17

Nakamura et al.6 reported podocyturia in a group of LN patients through immunofluorescence with the anti-podocalyxin antibody. Podocytes were not found in the urine of normal control subjects and patients without signs of systemic or renal disease. However, all patients with clinically active LN had podocytes in their urine samples. The authors concluded that podocyturia diagnosed with the anti-podocalyxin antibody could serve as an indicator of active LN.

Vogelmann et al.3 studied patients with focal segmental glomerulosclerosis and LN and found that less than 1% of the nucleated cells from urine sediments stained with DAPI were podocalyxin-positive and that labeling for anti-WT1 was negative in all cases. Approximately 30% to 40% of the podocalyxin-positive samples were labeled with synaptopodin, GLEPP1, or podocin. These reports and our study elicit the difficulties inherent to defining the most adequate markers for podocyturia using immunofluorescence staining.

Podocyturia labeled by the anti-podocin antibody was increased in patients with active LN. Podocin-positive cells were significantly correlated with disease severity, and cell counts were higher in patients with severe disease when compared to subjects with mild disease.

Patients without active disease had levels of podocyturia similar to the group with mild disease, and higher levels of podocyturia than controls, indicating that podocyturia may occur secondarily to early glomerular injury.

Podocytes were also seen in the urine of healthy individuals in the control group in all three markers used, but counts were lower than in patients with LN. Facca et al.18 studied women with preeclampsia and found podocytes in the urine of pregnant women without preeclampsia in the control group.

To sum up with, this study showed that podocyturia testing by indirect immunofluorescence may be useful in monitoring patients with LN. The anti-podocin antibody was the most suitable biomarker when compared to the anti-nephrin and anti-synaptopodin antibodies. The preliminary nature of our findings calls for more comprehensive investigations and clearer definitions for the clinical significance of podocyturia in various glomerulopathies. Methods with higher sensitivity to detect podocyturia are still needed.

 

REFERENCES

1. Petermann A, Floege J. Podocyte damage resulting in podocyturia: a potential diagnostic marker to assess glomerular disease activity. Nephron Clin Pract 2007;106:c61-6. PMID: 17570931        [ Links ]

2. Mundel P, Shankland SJ. Podocyte biology and response to injury. J Am Soc Nephrol 2002;13:3005-15. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.ASN.0000039661.06947.FD        [ Links ]

3. Vogelmann SU, Nelson WJ, Myers BD, Lemley KV. Urinary excretion of viable podocytes in health and renal disease. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 2003;285:F40-8. PMID: 12631553        [ Links ]

4. Nakamura T, Ushiyama C, Shimada N, Sekizuka K, Ebihara I, Hara M, et al. Effect of the antiplatelet drug dilazep dihydrochloride on urinary podocytes in patients in the early stage of diabetic nephropathy. Diabetes Care 2000;23:1168-71. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2337/diacare.23.8.1168        [ Links ]

5. Mathieson PW. What has the immune system got against the glomerular podocyte? Clin Exp Immunol 2003;134:1-5. PMID: 12974746        [ Links ]

6. Nakamura T, Ushiyama C, Suzuki S, Hara M, Shimada N, Sekizuka K, et al. Urinary podocytes for the assessment of disease activity in lupus nephritis. Am J Med Sci 2000;320:112-6. PMID: 10981486 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00000441-200008000-00009        [ Links ]

7. Nakamura T, Ushiyama C, Shimada N, Sekizuka K, Ebihara I, Hara M, et al. Effect of cyclophosphamide or azathioprine on urinary podocytes in patients with diffuse proliferative lupus nephritis. Nephron 2001;87:192-3. PMID: 11244319 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000045913        [ Links ]

8. Tan EM, Cohen AS, Fries JF, Masi AT, McShane DJ, Rothfield NF, et al. The 1982 revised criteria for the classification of systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum 1982;25:1271-7. PMID: 7138600 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/art.1780251101        [ Links ]

9. Solorzano GTM, Kirsztajn GM. Marcadores da atividade lúpica. In: Cruz J, Cruz HMM, Kirsztajn GM, Barros RT, eds. Atualidades em Nefrologia 10. São Paulo: Sarvier. 2008.p.116-20.         [ Links ]

10. Yu D, Petermann A, Kunter U, Rong S, Shankland SJ, Floege J. Urinary podocyte loss is a more specific marker of ongoing glomerular damage than proteinuria. J Am Soc Nephrol 2005;16:1733-41. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1681/ASN.2005020159        [ Links ]

11. Camici M. Urinary detection of podocyte injury. Biomed Pharmacother 2007;61:245-9. PMID: 17532599 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biopha.2006.12.009        [ Links ]

12. Solorzano GT, Silva MV, Moreira SR, Nishida SK, Kirsztajn GM. Urinary protein/creatinine ratio versus 24-hour proteinuria in the evaluation of lupus nephritis. J Bras Nefrol 2012;34:64-7. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0101-28002012000100010        [ Links ]

13. Garovic VD, Wagner SJ, Petrovic LM, Gray CE, Hall P, Sugimoto H, et al. Glomerular expression of nephrin and synaptopodin, but not podocin, is decreased in kidney sections from women with preeclampsia. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2007;22:1136-43. PMID: 17255128 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ndt/gfl711        [ Links ]

14. Garovic VD, Wagner SJ, Turner ST, Rosenthal DW, Watson WJ, Brost BC, et al. Urinary podocyte excretion as a marker for preeclampsia. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2007;196:320.e1-7. PMID: 17403404        [ Links ]

15. Zheng M, Lv LL, Ni J, Ni HF, Li Q, Ma KL, et al. Urinary podocyte-associated mRNA profile in various stages of diabetic nephropathy. PLoS One 2011;6:e20431.         [ Links ]

16. Wang G, Lai FM, Tam LS, Li KM, Lai KB, Chow KM, et al. Messenger RNA expression of podocyte-associated molecules in urinary sediment of patients with lupus nephritis. J Rheumatol 2007;34:2358-64.         [ Links ]

17. Perysinaki GS, Moysiadis DK, Bertsias G, Giannopoulou I, Kyriacou K, Nakopoulou L, et al. Podocyte main slit diaphragm proteins, nephrin and podocin, are affected at early stages of lupus nephritis and correlate with disease histology. Lupus 2011;20:781-91. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0961203310397412        [ Links ]

18. Facca TA, Kirsztajn GM, Pereira AR, Moreira SR, Teixeira VP, Nishida SK, et al. Renal evaluation in women with preeclampsia. Nephron Extra 2012;2:125-32. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000338271        [ Links ]

 

 

Correspondence to:
Gianna Mastroianni Kirsztajn
Federal University of São Paulo (UNIFESP)
Rua Botucatu, nº 740, Vila Clementino
São Paulo, SP, Brazil. CEP: 04023-900
E-mail: gianna@nefro.epm.br

Submitted on: 02/26/2013.
Approved on: 07/26/2013.

 

 

This study was carried out in the Federal University of São Paulo - UNIFESP.
Scholarship from the Institutional Program of Master's Degrees from CNPq, and research grant from FAPESP and CNPq.

Creative Commons License All the contents of this journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License