Variables associated with lung congestion as assessed by chest ultrasound in diabetics undergoing hemodialysis

Abstract

Introduction:

Ultrasound is an emerging method for assessing lung congestion but is still seldom used. Lung congestion is an important risk of cardiac events and death in end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients on hemodialysis (HD).

Objective:

We investigated possible variables associated with lung congestion among diabetics with ESRD on HD, using chest ultrasound to detect extracellular lung water.

Methods:

We studied 73 patients with diabetes as the primary cause of ESRD, undergoing regular HD. Lung congestion was assessed by counting the number of B lines detected by chest ultrasound. Hydration status was assessed by bioimpedance analysis and cardiac function by echocardiography. The collapse index of the inferior vena cava (IVC) was measured by ultrasonography. All patients were classified according to NYHA score. Correlations of the number of B lines with continuous variables and comparisons regarding the number of B lines according to categorical variables were performed. Multivariate linear regression was used to test the variables as independent predictors of the number of B lines.

Results:

None of the variables related to hydration status and cardiac function were associated with the number of B lines. In the multivariate analysis, only the IVC collapse index (b = 45.038; p < 0.001) and NYHA classes (b = 13.995; p = 0.006) were independent predictors of the number of B lines.

Conclusion:

Clinical evaluation based on NYHA score and measurement of the collapsed IVC index were found to be more reliable than bioimpedance analysis to predict lung congestion.

Keywords:
extracellular fluid; kidney failure, chronic; pulmonary edema; ultrasonography

Resumo

Introdução:

A ultrassonografia é um método emergente e ainda raramente utilizado na avaliação da congestão pulmonar. A congestão pulmonar é um importante fator de risco para eventos cardíacos e óbito entre pacientes com doença renal terminal (DRT) em hemodiálise (HD).

Objetivo:

Foram investigadas as possíveis variáveis associadas a congestão pulmonar em indivíduos diabéticos com DRT em HD, utilizando a ultrassonografia torácica para detectar água extracelular nos pulmões.

Métodos:

Foram estudados 73 pacientes com diabetes como causa primária de DRT submetidos a HD regular. A congestão pulmonar foi avaliada pela contagem do número de linhas B detectadas por ultrassonografia torácica. O estado de hidratação foi avaliado por análise de bioimpedância e a função cardíaca por ecocardiografia. O índice de colabamento da veia cava inferior (VCI) foi medido por ultrassonografia. Todos os pacientes foram classificados segundo a escore da NYHA. Foram analisadas as correlações entre o número de linhas B e variáveis contínuas e as comparações entre o número de linhas B em relação às variáveis categóricas. Regressão linear multivariada foi utilizada para testar as variáveis enquanto preditores independentes do número de linhas B.

Resultados:

Nenhuma das variáveis relacionadas a estado de hidratação e função cardíaca apresentou associação com o número de linhas B. Na análise multivariada, apenas o índice de colabamento da VCI (b = 45,038; p < 0,001) e as classes da NYHA (b = 13,995; p = 0,006) foram preditores independentes do número de linhas B.

Conclusão:

A avaliação clínica baseada na classificação da NYHA e na medição do índice de colabamento da VCI foram mais confiáveis do que a análise de bioimpedância para predizer congestão pulmonar.

Palavras-chave:
líquido extracelular; falência renal crônica; edema pulmonar; ultrassonografia

Introduction

Chronic volume overload and left ventricular disorders are hallmarks of end-stage renal disease (ESRD). These two disorders lead to high prevalence of lung congestion among ESRD patients undergoing hemodialysis (HD). It is estimated that 60% of patients on maintenance HD present lung congestion.¹ Besides hypervolemia and heart failure, high level of inflammation in ESRD patients contributes to lung congestion due to microvascular lung disease, provoking capillary leakage.^2,3

Lung congestion is a strong prognostic marker of cardiac events and death among ESRD patients submitted to HD. HD patients with severe congestion have a 4.2-fold higher risk of death and a 3.2-fold higher risk of cardiac events, like myocardial infarction, angina, heart failure and arrhythmia.¹

Clinical evaluation and bioimpedance analysis are daily tools in dialysis centers to estimate overhydration among HD patients in order to control lung congestion. However, extracellular volemia as assessed by bioimpedance is very weakly associated with lung water.⁴ Most importantly, extracellular and lung water were compared regarding their predictive power for adverse events. The conclusion is that lung water, and not extracellular water, is by far the most important predictor.⁴

Thus, how can lung water be detected? Pulmonary capillary wedge pressure is the most reliable method to estimate extravascular lung water, but this method of assessment is highly invasive. Recently, chest ultrasound has emerged as a safe, inexpensive and reliable method to measure lung congestion.⁵ Regardless of its simplicity, chest ultrasound is not yet incorporated in daily clinical evaluations. In daily practice, lung congestion is typically first evaluated by asking patients about symptoms, like dry cough, shortness of breath and dyspnea.

However, most patients even with moderate to severe lung congestion are asymptomatic.¹ Secondly, lung water is estimated by assessing volume overload by bioimpedance. But, as stated above, total extracellular water may be not correlated with lung water. Thus, ultra-filtration prescription guided by estimation of overhydration may not control lung congestion.

In addition, the complications of targeting euvolemia in conventional HD are well known: episodes of hypotension, loss of residual renal function and myocardial fibrosis by repetitive episodes of myocardial ischemia.^6,7 In summary, ultra-filtration based on overhydration may not control lung congestion and also poses well-known risks to HD patients.

Some authors argue in favor of some “permissive volume overload” in order to avoid the risks of targeting euvolemia.⁸ We think this “permissive volume overload” would be the amount of extracellular water with no lung congestion. However, the point is how to know whether or not lung congestion is present. Since chest ultrasound is still not widely used in dialysis centers, we thought it would be valuable to rely on reliable predictors of lung congestion among clinical and laboratory evaluations routinely performed among HD patients.

Diabetic patients on HD form a special group with high rate of mortality and cardiovascular disorders. This group of patients poses more challenges than other groups concerning the control of lung congestion. Thus, we conducted the present study aiming to find variables associated with lung congestion among diabetics with ESRD on maintenance HD.

Methods

We conducted a cross-sectional study with a sample selected among 305 ESRD patients on HD in June 2016 from the only two dialysis centers in an area of 34,560 km² (37.3 inhabitants/km²) in the northern region of Ceará state, northeast Brazil. We included patients with diabetes as the primary cause of ESRD, older than 18 years and undergoing regular HD for at least three months.

The criteria for exclusion were extremity amputation (precluding bioimpedance analysis) and clinical instability with hospitalization. All of them were undergoing conventional HD (three sessions of four hours per week) with polysulfone dialyzers (maximum number of reuses = 12). Written informed consent was obtained from all participants, and the study was approved by the ethics committee of Vale Acaraú University, with which the hospital is associated.

Evaluation of lung congestion

Lung congestion was evaluated by counting the number of B lines by using chest ultrasound. B lines were recognized as a hyperechogenic, coherent bundle with narrow basis spreading from the transducer to the further border of the screen, as described by Bedetti et al.⁹ B lines are the ultrasonographic expression of interlobular pulmonary septa thickened by edema.

Chest ultrasound was performed by two observers from our research group of medical students trained by an experienced radiologist. If the difference in the number of B lines was under 10% between the two observers, the mean of the two values was considered. In case of differences greater than 10%, a new chest ultrasound was performed by a third observer. There was only one case of difference greater than 10% between the two observers.

Chest ultrasound was performed shortly before the bioimpedance procedure and before the first HD session of the week (on Monday for patients with HD scheduled for Mondays, Wednesdays and Fridays, and on Tuesday for patients with HD scheduled for Tuesdays, Thursdays and Saturdays). Patients were examined in the supine position. The right and left thoracic regions were examined.

The observers identified and quantified the B lines by positioning the 3.0 MHz probe in 28 positions: from the second to fifth intercostal spaces of the right hemithorax; from the second to fourth intercostal spaces of the left hemithorax; and in each intercostal space in four positions: parasternal, midclavear, anterior and middle axillary lines.

Hydration status assessment

Patients’ hydration status was evaluated using bioimpedance analysis employing the spectroscopy technique, performed with a Body Composition Monitor^® (Fresenius Medical Care, Bad Homburg, Germany). Patients underwent bioimpedance analysis just before the first HD session after the weekend, in other words, after the longest interval between dialysis sessions, and after performing chest ultrasound.

The bioimpedance procedure was conducted according to the manufacturer’s manual by the nurses of the dialysis centers, all of them trained to use the Body Composition Monitor^®. If any erroneous measurements were detected by the BCM on the basis of a measurement quality indicator, the respective measurement was repeated by the nurse.

Three variables were assessed: 1-extracellular water (ECW) in liters = amount of water in the body which is not inside cells (interstitial water plus the plasma water plus the transcellular water); 2-fluid overload (FO) in liters = the excess fluid stored almost exclusively in the extracellular volume of a patient, therefore part of the ECW; and 3-relative fluid overload (rFO), calculated in percentage as follows: FO/ECW x 100. Hypervolemia was classified as rFO > 15%.

Cardiac function

Echocardiography was carried out by a cardiologist trained in echocardiography who assessed the following variables, according to the recommendations of the American Society of Echocardiography:¹⁰ left atrium volume (mm), diastolic thickness of the interventricular septum (mm), posterior wall diastolic thickness (mm), left ventricular diastolic diameter (mm), ventricular systolic diameter (mm), and ejection fraction of the left ventricle (%). Echocardiography was carried out during the same week in which chest ultrasound and bioimpedance were conducted.

Diameter of inferior vena cava

The same operator of echocardiography conducted the sonography procedure to measure the diameter (cm) of the inferior vena cava (IVC) by subcostal route. He measured this diameter after forced expiration and during inspiration. The IVC collapse index was calculated as follows: diameter in cm after forced expiration divided by diameter in cm during inspiration.

Classification by the new york heart association (NYHA) score

Patients were classified based on NYHA score by a doctor unaware of the results obtained by chest ultrasound, echocardiography, and sonography of vena cava. The NYHA scoring system stratifies patients into four classes.¹¹ Class I is the one with the least symptoms related to heart failure and IV corresponds to the most intense symptoms. This score is widely used in clinical practice and has already been validated in a population of ESRD patients.¹²

Demographic and clinical data

Demographic data, duration of diabetes since diagnosis, length of time on dialysis, type of vascular access, blood pressure, interdialysis weight gain and volume of diuresis per 24 hours were obtained from the two dialysis centers’ medical records. Volume of diuresis was recorded as it appeared in the medical records, stratified into four classes: zero diuresis (anuria)/24 h, up to 500 ml/24 h, from 500 to 1000 ml/24 h, and more than 1000 ml/24 h.

Classification of economic class was according to criteria of the form issued by the Brazilian Association of Research Institutes.¹³ This validated instrument is used in marketing surveys and population censuses and grades economic class into five subgroups: A (best status) through E (worst status). Besides income level, its criteria include educational level of the head of household and ownership of household appliances. Body mass index (BMI) was calculated as Kg/m². Laboratory tests for serum creatinine, hemoglobin, albumin, calcium and phosphorus were performed. The dialysis dose delivered was evaluated using a second-generation Kt/V equation according to Daugirdas.¹⁴

Statistical analyses

The Shapiro test was used to assess normality of the distribution of continuous variables. Continuous variables with normal distribution are expressed as mean ± standard deviation, while those without normal distribution are expressed as median, minimum and maximum values. Pearson and Spearman tests were used to assess correlation between the number of B lines and continuous variables, respectively with and without normal distribution.

Comparisons regarding the number of B lines according categorical variables were performed by the Mann-Whitney test (between two groups) and Kruskal Wallis test (between more than two groups). Multivariate linear regression was used to test the continuous variables (which correlated with the number of B lines) and categorical variables (which differed regarding the number of B lines) as independent predictors of the number of B lines (dependent variable). Statistical significance was considered to be a p-value < 0.05. All the statistical analyses were performed using the SPSS version 22.0 program package.

Results

Among the 305 ESRD patients undergoing HD, there were 87 with diabetes as the primary cause of ESRD. We excluded one patient due to age less than 18 years, four with less than three months of maintenance HD, six patients presenting extremity amputation, two clinically instable and hospitalized patients, and one who refused to participate. Therefore, we studied 73 patients.

Demographic and clinical data of the sample are shown in Table 1. Hydration status and echocardiography parameters are shown in Table 2. The only case of discordance due to the number of B lines observed by the examiners (58 versus 65 B lines) was decided as 65 B lines by a third observer. The number of B lines, as assessed by chest ultrasound, were positively correlated with left ventricular systolic diameter (r = 0.293; p = 0.030), left atrial diameter (r = 0.289; p = 0.036), septal thickness (r = 0.312; p = 0.021) and posterior wall thickness (r = 0.303; p = 0.025) as assessed by echocardiography, and with the IVC collapse index (r = 0.355; p = 0.008) as assessed by ultrasonography (Table 3).

Table 1
Demographic and clinical characteristics

Variables
Gender, n (%)	45 (62.5)
Men
Age, mean ± DP	60.6 ± 15.8
Economic class, n (%)
A	1 (1.3)
B	3 (4.1)
C	29 (39.7)
D	35 (48.0)
E	5 (6.9)
Duration of diabetes (years), median [min-max]	15 [1,5 - 47]
Time on dialysis (months), median [min-max]	23 [3 - 122]
Type of vascular access, n (%)
Native fistula	54 (75.0)
Double lumen catheter	18 (25.0)
Interdialysis weight gain (kg), mean ± DP	3,4 ± 1,7
Diuresis per 24 hours, n (%)
0	9 (12.5)
< 500 ml	46 (63.9)
500-1000 ml	13 (18.0)
1000 ml	4 (5.6)
Systolic blood pressure (mmHg), mean ± DP	162.1 ± 27.7
Diastolic blood pressure (mmHg), mean ± DP	77.3 ± 15.3
Body mass index (kg/m2), median [min-max]	26.1 [17.7-47.0]
NYHA class, n (%)
I	38 (52.8)
II	28 (38.9)
III	4 (5.5)
IV	2 (2.8)
Glycemia pre-dialysis (mg/dL), median [min-max]	190 [80 - 390]
Creatinine (mg/dL), median [min-max]	5 [2.4 - 12.6]
Hemoglobin (g/dL), mean ± DP	8.3 ± 1.4
Albumin (g/dL), median [min-max]	4.1 [2.0 - 4.9]
Calcium (mg/dL), mean ± DP	8.7 ± 0.9
Phosphorus (mg/dL), mean ± DP	4.7 ± 1.4
Calcium-phosphorus product (mg2/dL2), mean ± DP	42.4 ± 14.3
Kt/V index, mean ± DP	1.8 ± 0.6

Table 2
Hydration status and echocardiographic parameters

Extracellular water (L), mean ± DP	16.2 ± 3.0
Fluid overload (L), median [min-max]	2.2 [-7.5-5.6]
Relative fluid overload (%), mean ± DP	12.5 ± 10.0
Hypervolemia, n (%)
Yes	30 (41.7)
No	42 (58.3)
Inferior vena cava diameter (cm), mean ± DP	1.6 ± 0.3
Inferior vena cava collapse index	0.4 [0.07-1.0]
Left ventricular ejection fraction (%), median [min-max]	59.3 [33.6-66.0]
Left atrial diameter (mm), median [min-max]	37 [20.0-69.0]
Septal thickness (mm), median [min-max]	12 [9-16]
Posterior wall thickness (mm), median [min-max]	12 [9-16]
Left ventricular diastolic diameter (mm), mean ± DP	51.0 ± 5.4
Left ventricular systolic diameter (mm), median [min-max]	32.0 [19.0-49.0]

Table 3
Correlations between continuous variables and the number of b lines

Variable	r (correlation coefficient)	p
Patient’s age	-0.198	0.140
Duration of diabetes	0.107	0.433
Time on Dialysis	0.036	0.791
Interdialysis weight gain	-0.106	0.470
Systolic blood pressure	0.139	0.306
Diastolic blood pressure	0.028	0.837
Kt/V index	-0.050	0.718
Albumin	0.003	0.983
Phosphorus	-0.052	0.730
Calcium-phosphorus product	-0.027	0.859
Extracellular water	0.047	0.731
Fluid overload	0.131	0.335
Inferior vena cava diameter	0.223	0.102
Inferior vena cava collapse index	0.355	0.008
Ejection fraction	-0.132	0.337
Left atrial diameter	0.289	0.036
Septal thickness	0.312	0.021
Posterior wall thickness	0.303	0.025
Left ventricular diastolic diameter	0.203	0.137
Left ventricular systolic diameter	0.293	0.030

In the comparison regarding the number of B lines according the categorical variables, we found a difference regarding the number of B lines according to NYHA classes: medians of 10 in class I, 19 in class II, 30 in class III and 65.5 in class IV (p = 0.042) (Table 4). In the multivariate analysis, only the IVC collapse index (b = 45.038; p < 0.001) and NYHA classes (b = 13.995; p = 0.006) were independent predictors of the number of B lines (Table 5).

Table 4
Comparison between the number of B lines according to categorical variable

Variable	Number of B lines (median)	p
Gender		0.163
Men	12
Women	21.5
Diuresis
0	9	0.492
< 500 ml	14
500-1000 ml	21.5
> 1000 ml	19
Type of vascular access
Fistula	13.5	0.868
Catheter	14
NYHA classes
I	10	0.042
II	19
III	30
IV	65.5
Hypervolemia		0.231
Yes	15
No	10.5

Table 5
Multivariate linear regression to test predictors of the number of b lines

Variable	b (regression coefficient)	p
Inferior vena cava colapse index	45.038	< 0.001
NYHA class	13.995	0.006
Left atrial diameter	0.275	0.493
Septal thickness	0.074	0.992
Posterior wall thickness	1.438	0.851
Left ventricular systolic diameter	0.899	0.204

Discussion

As others,^4,15 we showed the lack of association between lung congestion and hydration status, as assessed by bioimpedance. This result leads to practical implications, since extracellular water assessed by bioimpedance is usually the guide for the ultra-filtration prescription of HD patients. Thus, the control of volemia based on extracellular water does not guarantee the control of lung water.

However, the benefit of controlling volemia is to preclude heart burden and mainly lung congestion. Lung water is the main marker of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality, not the total extracellular water. Moreover, to target dry weight based on overhydration imposes risks of episodes of hypotension, most of them asymptomatic. Repetitive episodes of hypotension due to excessive ultra-filtration, especially among patients who present large interdialysis weight gain, can lead to myocardial stunning, which can cause myocardial remodeling and fibrosis.^6,7

Also, we did not find correlation of lung water with cardiac function. None of the differences found in univariate analysis regarding the parameters of echocardiography were significant in the multivariate analysis. Lack of correlation between cardiac function and lung congestion may be due to sample characteristics.

Comparing the studies of Mallamaci et al.¹⁶ and Siriopol et al., ⁴ we observe that cardiac function correlates with lung water only in the former. We suppose that the divergence related to the correlation between cardiac function, and lung congestion is partially explained by sample characteristics. Our sample, like the sample studied by Siriopol et al.,⁴ presented relatively good cardiac function and a narrow range of values of ejection fraction: 59.3% (33.6% to 66%) in ours and 61.5% ± 7.7% in the other study.⁴

In both studies, there was no correlation between cardiac function and extracellular lung water. On the other hand, in the study of Mallamaci et al.,¹⁶ they found a correlation of cardiac function with lung water, probably because their sample presented a wider range of values of ejection fraction: from 15% to 70%; and worse cardiac function among patients with lung congestion: ejection fraction of 49%.

Thus, we hypothesize that in samples with a better systolic function, lung water can be dissociated from extracellular lung water. The good cardiac function of our sample can be explained by a well-known survivor selection: diabetics with poorer cardiovascular condition with no adequate medical follow-up in underdeveloped areas often die from cardiovascular complications before starting HD.

Traditional predictors of fluid overload were not validated as variables associated with lung congestion in our study, like lower body mass index,^17,18 less residual urine output,¹⁸ higher systolic blood pressure.^18,19 In our study, the NYHA result (a very simple scoring based on clinical evaluation) and IVC collapse index (a well-known marker of hypervolemia) were associated with lung congestion.

We firmly believe that in a short time, routine evaluation of lung congestion by chest ultrasound will be incorporated in dialysis centers and will widely replace bioimpedance as the main guide for ultra-filtration prescription. Meanwhile, and according to our result, how can NYHA and IVC collapse index be useful? We suggest NYHA be used by doctors and nurses in a systematic way and assessed weekly.

Since measurement of IVC is not performed in routine echocardiography of HD patients, we propose that information on IVC diameter and its collapse index be incorporated in echocardiography records. Better than this would be the regular evaluation of IVC by dialysis center teams themselves, as a way to help define patients’ dry weight. Finally, none of these parameters are substitutes for periodic anamnesis and physical examination.

Although chest ultrasound is a very practical method to assess lung congestion, neither follow-up of HD patients by chest ultrasound nor interventions based on its results have been shown to modify patients’ outcomes in the literature. Our experience in this study was that the learning curve of performing chest ultrasound for this purpose by non-specialists is very fast. However, the method is totally dependent on the operator. Thus, the counting of B lines depends on the operator’s skill.

We are aware of several limitations of our study. First, the study presents a cross-sectional design and most of the variables are dynamic. However, due to the exclusion of patients with less than three months of HD and those hospitalized, we studied only stable patients. Stable patients do not have big changes of cardiac function and of the pattern of interdialysis weight gain in the short term. Second, as stated in the introduction, inflammation probably acts as a mediator of pulmonary capillary leakage, predisposing the appearance of extracellular lung water.

Thus, it would have been better to have had data on inflammation markers, like C-reactive protein and proinflammatory cytokines. Also, cardiac biomarkers (D-dimer, troponin T, natriuretic peptide) would make the panel of variables more complete. We had albumin in our study, which is a marker of malnutrition-inflammation syndrome. However, low levels of albumin only appear in advanced stages of this syndrome. Finally, despite being a sub-group of patients with high cardiovascular risk, our sample presented a relatively good cardiac function. Therefore, our results cannot be extrapolated to more typical samples of diabetics with more compromised cardiac function.

Conclusion

Clinical evaluations based on NYHA score and on the IVC collapse index assessed by ultrasonography are associated with lung congestion. Routine use of these variables can help to establish a safe ultra-filtration goal able to control and avoid lung congestion without major cardiovascular risks. In our opinion, these indirect evaluations using predictors of lung congestion will soon be replaced by the incorporation of chest ultrasound to assess lung water directly and routinely.

References

• ¹
  Zoccali C, Torino C, Tripepi R, Tripepi G, D'Arrigo G, Postorino M, et al.; Lung US in CKD Working Group. Pulmonary congestion predicts cardiac events and mortality in ESRD. J Am Soc Nephrol 2013;24:639-46. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1681/ASN.2012100990
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1681/ASN.2012100990
• ²
  Hoke TS, Douglas IS, Klein CL, He Z, Fang W, Thurman JM, et al. Acute renal failure after bilateral nephrectomy is associated with cytokine-mediated pulmonary injury. J Am Soc Nephrol 2007;18:155-64. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1681/ASN.2006050494
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1681/ASN.2006050494
• ³
  Aman J, van der Heijden M, van Lingen A, Girbes AR, van Nieuw Amerongen GP, van Hinsbergh VW, et al. Plasma protein levels are markers of pulmonary vascular permeability and degree of lung injury in critically ill patients with or at risk for acute lung injury/acute respiratory distress syndrome. Crit Care Med 2011;39:89-97. PMID: 21057316 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181feb46a
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181feb46a
• ⁴
  Siriopol D, Hogas S, Voroneanu L, Onofriescu M, Apetrii M, Oleniuc M, et al. Predicting mortality in haemodialysis patients: a comparison between lung ultrasonography, bioimpedance data and echocardiography parameters. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2013;28:2851-9. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ndt/gft260
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ndt/gft260
• ⁵
  Picano E, Gargani L. Ultrasound lung comets: the shape of lung water. Eur J Heart Fail 2012;14:1194-6. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurjhf/hfs157
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurjhf/hfs157
• ⁶
  Jansen MA, Hart AA, Korevaar JC, Dekker FW, Boeschoten EW, Krediet RT; NECOSAD Study Group. Predictors of the rate of decline of residual renal function in incident dialysis patients. Kidney Int 2002;62:1046-53. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1755.2002.00505.x
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1755.2002.00505.x
• ⁷
  Burton JO, Jefferies HJ, Selby NM, McIntyre CW. Hemodialysis-induced repetitive myocardial injury results in global and segmental reduction in systolic cardiac function. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2009;4:1925-31. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2215/CJN.04470709
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.2215/CJN.04470709
• ⁸
  Huang SH, Filler G, Lindsay R, McIntyre CW. Euvolemia in hemodialysis patients: a potentially dangerous goal? Semin Dial 2015;28:1-5.
• ⁹
  Bedetti G, Gargani L, Corbisiero A, Frassi F, Poggianti E, Mottola G. Evaluation of ultrasound lung comets by hand-held echocardiography. Cardiovasc Ultrasound 2006;4:34. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1476-7120-4-34
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1476-7120-4-34
• ¹⁰
  Lang RM, Bierig M, Devereux RB, Flachskampf FA, Foster E, Pellikka PA, et al.; Chamber Quantification Writing Group; American Society of Echocardiography's Guidelines and Standards Committee; European Association of Echocardiography. Recommendations for chamber quantification: a report from the American Society of Echocardiography's Guidelines and Standards Committee and the Chamber Quantification Writing Group, developed in conjunction with the European Association of Echocardiography, a branch of the European Society of Cardiology. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2005;18:1440-63. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.echo.2005.10.005
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.echo.2005.10.005
• ¹¹
  Hurst JW, Morris DC, Alexander RW. The use of the New York Heart Association's classification of cardiovascular disease as part of the patient's complete Problem List. Clin Cardiol 1999;22:385-90. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/clc.4960220604
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/clc.4960220604
• ¹²
  Postorino M, Marino C, Tripepi G, Zoccali C; Calabrian Registry of Dialysis and Transplantation. Prognostic value of the New York Heart Association classification in end-stage renal disease. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2007;22:1377-82. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ndt/gfl813
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ndt/gfl813
• ¹³
  Brazilian Association of Research Institutes. Brazilian criteria 2015 and social class distribution update for 2016. 2015 [cited 2016 Mar 26]. Available from: http://www.abep.org/criterio-brasil
  » http://www.abep.org/criterio-brasil
• ¹⁴
  Daugirdas JT. Second generation logarithmic estimates of single-pool variable volume Kt/V: an analysis of error. J Am Soc Nephrol 1993;4:1205-13.
• ¹⁵
  Paudel K, Kausik T, Visser A, Ramballi C, Fan SL. Comparing lung ultrasound with bioimpedance spectroscopy for evaluating hydration in peritoneal dialysis patients. Nephrology (Carlton) 2015;20:1-5. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/nep.12342
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/nep.12342
• ¹⁶
  Mallamaci F, Benedetto FA, Tripepi R, Rastelli S, Castellino P, Tripepi G, et al. Detection of pulmonary congestion by chest ultrasound in dialysis patients. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2010;3:586-94. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2010.02.005
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2010.02.005
• ¹⁷
  Antlanger M, Hecking M, Haidinger M, Werzowa J, Kovarik JJ, Paul G, et al. Fluid overload in hemodialysis patients: a cross-sectional study to determine its association with cardiac biomarkers and nutritional status. BMC Nephrol 2013,14:266. PMID: 24295522 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2369-14-266
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2369-14-266
• ¹⁸
  Guo Q, Yi C, Li J, Wu X, Yang X, Yu X. Prevalence and risk factors of fluid overload in Southern Chinese continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis patients. PLoS One 2013;8:e53294. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0053294
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0053294
• ¹⁹
  Yilmaz Z, Yildirim Y, Aydin FY, Aydin E, Kadiroglu AK, Yilmaz ME, et al. Evaluation of fluid status related parameters in hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis patients: Clinical usefulness of bioimpedance analysis. Medicina (Kaunas) 2014;50:269-74. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.medici.2014.10.007
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.medici.2014.10.007

Publication Dates

• Publication in this collection
  Oct-Dec 2017

History

• Received
  20 Mar 2017
• Accepted
  23 May 2017