Acessibilidade / Reportar erro

Small non-coding RNAs: from trash to treasure

Since the discovery of the first microRNA in 1993, our non-coding RNA knowledge has grown exponentially11 Lee RC, Feinbaum RL, Ambros V. The C. elegans heterochronic gene lin-4 encodes small RNAs with antisense complementarity to lin-14. Cell 1993;75:843-54.. Previously thought as transcriptional trash, given the lack of translation into protein, non-coding RNAs are now known to play critical biological roles22 Jonas S, Izaurralde E. Towards a molecular understanding of microRNA-mediated gene silencing. Nat Rev Genet 2015;16:421-33.

3 Prasanth KV, Prasanth SG, Xuan Z, Hearn S, Freier SM, Bennett CF, et al. Regulating gene expression through RNA nuclear retention. Cell 2005;123:249-63.
-44 Cech TR, Steitz JA. The noncoding RNA revolution-trashing old rules to forge new ones. Cell 2014;157:77-94. DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2014.03.008
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2014.03.0...
A number of different types of non-coding RNA have been discovered, the most prominent ones include long non-coding RNAs, microRNAs (miRNA), and small interfering RNAs (siRNA). The first miRNA discovered was described in the nematode C. elegans, and twenty-six years later there are over 2600 (miRBase V22) miRNAs annotated to the human genome55 Alles J, Fehlmann T, Fischer U, Backes C, Galata V, Minet M, et al. An estimate of the total number of true human miRNAs. Nucleic Acids Res 2019;47:3353-64. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkz097
https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkz097...

MiRNA molecules are 21-22 nucleotides long and bind to proteins in order to form complexes (RNA-induced silencing complex, or RISC) to then target messenger RNA transcripts with base-pair complementarity to the miRNA. The targeted messenger RNA may have its translation blocked or its transcript degraded. The advent of next-generation sequencing has potentiated the discovery of new miRNAs at a much faster rate. Two decades after the discovery, we are starting to scratch the surface of the possibilities of miRNAs' use as biomarkers, diagnositc and prognostic tools.

In this edition of the BJN, Milhoransa P et al.66 Milhoransa P, Montanari CC, Montenegro R, Manfro RC. Micro RNA 146a-5p expression in Kidney transplant recipients with delayed graft function. Braz J Nephrol 2018 Nov 8. pii: S0101-28002018005038102. DOI: 10.1590/2175-8239-jbn-2018-0098 [Epub ahead of print]
https://doi.org/10.1590/2175-8239-jbn-20...
assessed the expression of miR-146a-5p in 55 kidney transplant recipients and compared stable graft function controls (SGF) with delayed graft function (DGF) and acute rejection (AR) individuals. The authors demonstrated that miR-146a-5p was differentially expressed in DGF kidney biopsy samples versus SGF (DGF median=3.23; interquartile [IQR]=1.46-5.74 vs. SGF median=0.78; IQR=0.57-1.99; P=0.019). Both AR and SGF groups had lower levels of miR-146a-5p. The peripheral blood quantification of miR-146a-5p did not demonstrate differential expression in the DFG group vs. AR and SGF groups. Another important finding was that peripheral blood expression levels of miR-146a-5p did not correlate with the kidney tissue expression levels.

The authors hypothesized that miR-146a-5p would have higher expression in DGF patients and potentially serve as a non-invasive marker. The hypothesis is based on previous studies on experimental mouse models of ischemia-reperfusion injury and IgA nephropathy in which higher levels correlated with the degree of injury. The miR-146a-5p is thought to play a central role in innate immune response, specifically in immune cells, but also in kidney cells. The current article confirmed the hypothesis in kidney tissue of DGF patients.

MiRNAs are an attractive molecule for the development of a non-invasive biomarker. They are present intracellularly but also remain stable in blood and urine due to protein binding and inside exosomes, therefore resisting enzymatic degradation through ribonucleases.77 Mall C, Rocke DM, Durbin-Johnson B, Weiss RH. Stability of miRNA in human urine supports its biomarker potential. Biomark Med 2013;7:623-31. This study presented a molecule with good correlation between DGF outcomes and expression levels. More work is needed to make it ready for prime time given the specificity and sensitivity in the 60-70% range. The vast number of different miRNAs acting on each cell simultaneously poses a tough challenge to identify a single miRNA with the strongest association to the outcome of interest. Besides, miRNAs are tissue-specific, having different functions and expression patterns in different cell types depending on stimuli.

The presented findings are limited by the study’s low number of subjects, especially in the control group (n=13), which showed a high interquartile variation for miR-146a-5p expression, therefore hindering the statistical power. As the authors proposed, a targeted and cost-effective way to assess the kidney compartment would be to isolate miRNAs from urine, which has been proven to be reliable and practical.77 Mall C, Rocke DM, Durbin-Johnson B, Weiss RH. Stability of miRNA in human urine supports its biomarker potential. Biomark Med 2013;7:623-31.

The transplant field is gasping for a non-invasive allograft function marker that is low-cost, reproducible, and able to detect allograft dysfunction early, for a timely intervention and consequently improved long-term outcomes. The authors presented exciting new findings that with optimization will bring the assay closer to a suitable biomarker. More than one miRNA might be necessary to achieve the sensitivity and specificity required for a screening test. For now, we have to settle for creatinine, a test that detects kidney injury a few days too late.

REFERENCES

  • 1
    Lee RC, Feinbaum RL, Ambros V. The C. elegans heterochronic gene lin-4 encodes small RNAs with antisense complementarity to lin-14. Cell 1993;75:843-54.
  • 2
    Jonas S, Izaurralde E. Towards a molecular understanding of microRNA-mediated gene silencing. Nat Rev Genet 2015;16:421-33.
  • 3
    Prasanth KV, Prasanth SG, Xuan Z, Hearn S, Freier SM, Bennett CF, et al. Regulating gene expression through RNA nuclear retention. Cell 2005;123:249-63.
  • 4
    Cech TR, Steitz JA. The noncoding RNA revolution-trashing old rules to forge new ones. Cell 2014;157:77-94. DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2014.03.008
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2014.03.008
  • 5
    Alles J, Fehlmann T, Fischer U, Backes C, Galata V, Minet M, et al. An estimate of the total number of true human miRNAs. Nucleic Acids Res 2019;47:3353-64. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkz097
    » https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkz097
  • 6
    Milhoransa P, Montanari CC, Montenegro R, Manfro RC. Micro RNA 146a-5p expression in Kidney transplant recipients with delayed graft function. Braz J Nephrol 2018 Nov 8. pii: S0101-28002018005038102. DOI: 10.1590/2175-8239-jbn-2018-0098 [Epub ahead of print]
    » https://doi.org/10.1590/2175-8239-jbn-2018-0098 [Epub ahead of print]
  • 7
    Mall C, Rocke DM, Durbin-Johnson B, Weiss RH. Stability of miRNA in human urine supports its biomarker potential. Biomark Med 2013;7:623-31.

Publication Dates

  • Publication in this collection
    10 July 2019
  • Date of issue
    Apr-Jun 2019

History

  • Received
    12 Apr 2019
  • Accepted
    21 Apr 2019
Sociedade Brasileira de Nefrologia Rua Machado Bittencourt, 205 - 5ºandar - conj. 53 - Vila Clementino - CEP:04044-000 - São Paulo SP, Telefones: (11) 5579-1242/5579-6937, Fax (11) 5573-6000 - São Paulo - SP - Brazil
E-mail: bjnephrology@gmail.com