SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.24 número2Primeiro registro da família Cithaeronidae (Araneae, Gnaphosoidea) no Novo MundoNaididae (Annelida, Oligochaeta) associadas a briófitas em Brotas, Estado de São Paulo, Brasil índice de autoresíndice de assuntospesquisa de artigos
Home Pagelista alfabética de periódicos  

Revista Brasileira de Zoologia

versão impressa ISSN 0101-8175

Rev. Bras. Zool. v.24 n.2 Curitiba jun. 2007

http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0101-81752007000200035 

SCIENTIFIC COMMUNICATION

 

The relative contribution of fruits and arthropods to the diet of three trogon species (Aves, Trogonidae) in the Brazilian Atlantic Forest

 

A contribuição relativa de frutos e artrópodes para a dieta de três espécies de surucuás (Aves, Trogonidae) na Mata Atlântica

 

 

Marco Aurélio Pizo

Programa de Pós-graduação em Biologia, Centro de Ciências da Saúde, Universidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos. 93022-000 São Leopoldo, Rio Grande do Sul, Brasil. E-mail: mapizo@unisinos.br

 

 


ABSTRACT

Trogons are pan-tropical forest birds that eat a mix of fruits and arthropods. With direct observations of wild feeding birds, I assessed the relative contribution of fruits and arthropods to the diet of three trogon species (Trogonviridis, T.surrucura, and T.rufus) at Parque Estadual Intervales, southeast Brazil. Fruits and arthropods made the bulk of the food items recorded, with a tendency of frugivory increasing with body mass. The Trogon species differed in the proportion of fruits and arthropods taken, with T.viridis being the most frugivorous species (66% of feeding bouts, n = 47). The relative contribution of fruits and arthropods did not differ between the wet and dry seasons for any species. In the omnivorous gradient, T.viridis is close to the frugivorous extreme, whereas T.surrucura and T.rufus is next to the insectivorous end. Such a distinction may have important consequences for the territoriality and social behavior of these birds.

Key words: Brazil; frugivory; insectivory; Trogon.


RESUMO

Os surucuás são aves florestais pantropicais que se alimentam de frutos e artrópodes. Com observações diretas de aves forrageando na natureza, estudei a contribuição relativa de frutos e artrópodes para a dieta de três espécies de surucuás (Trogonviridis, T.surrucura, and T.rufus) no Parque Estadual Intervales, sudeste do Brasil. Frutos e artrópodes foram os itens mais registrados, com uma tendência do grau de frugivoria aumentar com o aumento da massa corporal da ave. As três espécies diferiram em relação à proporção de frutos e artrópodes de que se alimentam; T.viridisfoi a espécie mais frugívora (66% dos registros, n = 47). As contribuições relativas de frutos e artrópodes para a dieta não diferiram entre as estações seca e úmida para nenhuma das três espécies. A diferença no grau de frugivoria aqui revelada pode ter conseqüências importantes para a territorialidade e organização social dos surucuás.

Palavras-chave: Brasil; frugivoria; insetivoria; Trogon.


 

 

Trogons are pan-tropical birds occurring preferentially in forests on almost all major land masses around the Equator, from sea-level to 3,500 m (JOHNSGARD 2000, DEL HOYO et al. 2001). Nine species occur in Brazil, five of which in the Atlantic forest (SICK 1997). Ecologically, they play a critical role in dispersing large seeds (i.e. > 15 mm diameter), which usually have a small group of seed dispersers (SILVA & TABARELLI 2000). The most detailed study on the diet of Neotropical trogons revealed that they eat a mix of fruits and arthropods, with the frugivory level increasing with body mass (REMSEN et al. 1993). This study, however, was based on information recorded on labels of museum skins, a method that may bias the results due to the inaccuracy and small resolution of label notations in what concerns stomach contents. Direct observations are thus preferable over label information as a source of general diet composition. In this paper I present information on the diet of three trogon species in the Atlantic forest (Trogon viridis Linnaeus, 1766, T. surrucura Vieillot, 1817, and T. rufus Gmelin, 1788) gathered through direct observations of foraging birds. Given the general scarcity of fleshy fruits during the dry season at the study site, I predicted that the relative contribution of fruits and arthropods would vary seasonally, with the consumption of arthropods being higher in the dry season, as suggested for Trogon citreolus Gould, 1835 in Mexico (EGUIARTE & MARTINEZ DEL RIO 1985).

The study was carried out from approximately 400 to 900 m asl at Parque Estadual Intervales (PEI, 24°16’S, 48°25’W) where the three trogon species occur sintopically. PEI is a 49,000-ha reserve of Atlantic rain forest (sensu MORELLATO & HADDAD 2000) in a mosaic of successional stages. Annual rainfall is around 1,600 mm. Although climate is generally wet, a driest season can be distinguished between May and August. Data were collected opportunistically during visits to PEI carried out from 1990 to 2002. Every time I found a bird apparently looking for food (i.e. in the typical manner of trogons, turning the head slowly from side to side while scanning the vegetation; DEL HOYO et al. 2001), I waited until the bird made a foraging attack (invariably through flight-powered maneuvers) or moved away. For each attack, I recorded a foraging bout and noted the item taken. Contrary to fruits, the arthropods captured, especially small ones, could not be always seen with certainty. In such instances, when birds directed their foraging maneuver to foliage with no fruit in the immediate vicinity, I recorded an arthropod foraging. Alternatively, when fruits were present, no record was made. To ensure independent records, I considered only the initial observation for each individual bird (HEJL et al. 1990). I cross-classified all foraging bouts by trogon species and season (wet x dry) categories. To the resulting two-way frequency table I performed log-linear analyses to examine whether species and season (design variables) affect the frequency of feeding bouts on fruits and arthropods (response variables). The significance of each design variable and their interaction was assessed by Maximum Likelihood Chi-square relative to the model it was added (Test of Marginal Association). Analyses were implemented in Statistica v. 6.0 (STATISOFT 1996).

 

 

Fruits and arthropods made the bulk of the food items recorded (Tab. I). The only other item was an unidentified flower ate by Trogon viridis in the dry season. Although trogons may occasionally eat small vertebrates (DEL HOYO et al. 2001), none was recorded. The general tendency of frugivory increasing with body mass revealed by REMSEN et al. (1993) held also in the present study: T. viridis, the largest species (87.6 g; all weights from JOHNSGARD 2000), had 66% of the records on fruits; this proportion dropped to 25% in T. surrucura (75 g), and 14.3% in T. rufus (52.8 g). The species differed in the relative use of fruits and arthropods (c2 = 12.48, df = 2, p = 0.002), mainly due to the frequent consumption of fruits by T. viridis. Contrary to expectations, the relative contribution of fruits and arthropods did not varies seasonally (c2 = 0.00, df = 1, p = 0.97), and the interaction between species and season was not significant as well (c2 = 4.48, df = 2, p = 0.11) (Tab. I).

The higher tendency to frugivory by T. viridis in comparison with T. surrucura and T. rufus has already showed up in the data presented by REMSEN et al. (1993). Of the 29 T. viridis stomachs they analyzed 58.6% had fruits, a figure that dropped to 35.7% for T. surrucura (n = 14), and 37.0% for T. rufus (n = 27). Together these data reveal that in the omnivorous gradient, T. viridis is close to the frugivory extreme, whereas T. surrucura and T. rufus are next to the insectivorous end. Such a distinction may have important consequences for the territoriality and social behavior of these birds (STUTCHBURY & MORTON 2001), which deserves further investigation

The optimal foraging theory predicts that niche breadth should generally increase as resource availability decreases (MACARTHUR & PIANKA 1966, SCHOENER 1971). Under such conditions, a consumer can not afford to bypass inferior food items because mean search time per item encountered is long and the expectation of finding a preferable food item is low. Given this one could expect a more pronounced reliance upon arthropods by T. viridis during the dry season when fruits are scant at the study site. However, T. viridis used roughly the same proportion of fruits and arthropods between the two seasons, suggesting that either T. viridis adjust its time budget to overcome the general fruit scarcity in the dry season (e.g. spending more time searching for fruits) and/or arthropods also decrease in abundance in the dry season, a possibility that I can not presently evaluate for the study site but that proved to be true for other Atlantic forest areas (DAVIS 1945, DEVELEY & PERES 2000).

 

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

To the Fundação Florestal do Estado de São Paulo, former manager of the Parque Estadual Intervales, for permission to work at the Parque and logistical support, and to an anonymous reviewer who helped to shape the paper. Financial support came from FAPESP and CNPq.

 

REFERENCES

DAVIS, D.E. 1945. The annual cycle of plants, mosquitoes, birds and mammals in two Brazilian forests. Ecological Monographs 15: 243-295.         [ Links ]

DEVELEY, P.F. & C.A. PERES. 2000. Resource seasonality and the structure of mixed species flocks in a coastal Atlantic forest of southeastern Brazil. Journal of Tropical Ecology 16 (1): 33-53.         [ Links ]

DEL HOYO, J.; A. ELLIOT & J. SARGATAL. 2001. Handbook of the birds of the world. Barcelona, Lynx Edicions, vol. 6, 589p.         [ Links ]

EGUIARTE, L.E. & C. MARTÍNEZ DEL RIO. 1985. Feeding habits of the citreoline trogon in a tropical deciduous forest during the dry season. The Condor 102 (4): 872-874.         [ Links ]

HEJL, S.L.; J. VERNER & G.W. BELL. 1990. Sequential versus initial observations in studies of avian foraging. Studies in Avian Biology 13: 166-173.        [ Links ]

JOHNSGARD, P.A. 2000. Trogons and quetzals of the world. Washington, Smithsonian Institution Press, 223p.         [ Links ]

MACARTHUR, R.H. & E.R. PIANKA. 1966. On optimal use of a patch environment. The American Naturalist 100: 603-609.        [ Links ]

MORELLATO, L.P.C. & C.F.B. HADDAD. 2000. Introduction: the Brazilian Atlantic Forest. Biotropica 32: 786-792.         [ Links ]

REMSEN JR, J.V.; M.A. HYDE & A. CHAPMAN. 1993. The diet of neotropical trogons, motmots, barbets and toucans. The Condor 95 (2): 178-192.         [ Links ]

SCHOENER, T.W. 1971. Theory of feeding strategies. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 2: 369-404.         [ Links ]

SICK, H. 1997. Ornitologia brasileira. Rio de Janeiro, Editora Nova Fronteira, 862p.         [ Links ]

SILVA, J.M.C. & M. TABARELLI. 2000. Tree species impoverishment and the future flora of the Atlantic Forest of northeast Brazil. Nature 404: 72-74.         [ Links ]

STATSOFT. 1996. Statistica for Windows: computer program manual. Tulsa, Statisoft Inc.         [ Links ]

STUTCHBURY, B.J.M. & E.S. MORTON. 2001. Behavioral ecology of Tropical birds. San Diego, Academic Press, IX+165p.        [ Links ]

 

 

Received in 15.VIII.2006; accepted in 27.IV.2007.