Print version ISSN 0102-0536
Hortic. Bras. vol.25 no.3 Brasília July/Sept. 2007
A reliable begomovirus inoculation method for screening Lycopersicon esculentum lines
Um método de inoculação de begomovírus confiável para a seleção de linhagens de Lycopersicon esculentim
Alice K Inoue-NagataI; Tatsuya NagataII; Antonio C de ÁvilaI; Leonardo de B GiordanoI
IEmbrapa Hortaliças, C. Postal 218, 70359-970 Brasília-DF
IIUniversidade Católica de Brasília, 70790-160 Brasília-DF; firstname.lastname@example.org
Due to failures of infection after mechanical inoculation of begomovirus on tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) plants, an efficient and reliable begomovirus inoculation method was developed using the whitefly vector (Bemisia tabaci). Virus acquisition was carried out using a 'Tube-cage', made of a polypropylene tube, containing one to two day-old whiteflies and a tomato plant apex infected with a begomovirus isolate. After 48 h of acquisition access period, inoculation was done using a 'Ring-cage', containing viruliferous whiteflies, attached to the abaxial side of the leaf of young tomato plants. 48 hours after acquisition, the whiteflies were eliminated and the inoculated plants were incubated for 28 days under greenhouse conditions. Three viruliferous whiteflies per plant were enough to cause infection in susceptible tomato cv. Viradoro. This procedure was applied to test the resistance of tomato line 486-1 (resistant line) in comparison with 'Viradoro' (susceptible cultivar). Dot blot hybridization confirmed the susceptibility of 'Viradoro' and the resistance of the line 486-1, showing the efficiency of this method for screening plants for disease resistance. This method is also a useful tool in detecting the presence of virus in inoculated (lower leaves) and in non-inoculated (upper leaves) in a given plant. Using this procedure, it was observed that the resistance of the line 486-1 probably is expressed in the inoculated leaf without virus translocation to the upper leaves.
Keywords: Lycopersicon esculentum, inoculation, resistance, screening, geminivirus.
Devido às falhas encontradas no método de inoculação de begomovírus em plantas de tomateiro, um método eficiente e confiável de inoculação de begomovírus foi desenvolvido utilizando como vetor a mosca-branca (Bemisia tabaci). A aquisição viral foi realizada em uma armadilha ('Tube-cage') feita a partir de um tubo de polipropileno contendo moscas-brancas de um ou dois dias de idade e o ápice de uma planta de tomate infectada com um begomovírus. Após 48 horas de período de aquisição, procedeu-se à inoculação utilizando-se uma armadilha em forma de anel ('Ring-cage') contendo as moscas-brancas virulíferas. A armadilha foi colocada na parte abaxial das folhas de plântulas de tomateiro. Após o período de inoculação de 48 horas, as moscas-brancas foram eliminadas e as plantas inoculadas foram incubadas por 28 dias em casa-de-vegetação. Utilizando-se este método três moscas-brancas virulíferas por planta foram suficientes para causar infecção em tomateiro susceptível cv. Viradoro. Este procedimento foi aplicado para avaliar a resistência de tomateiro linhagem 486-1 (resistente) em comparação com 'Viradoro'. Hibridização por dot-blot confirmou a susceptibilidade de 'Viradoro' e a resistência da linhagem 486-1, mostrando a utilidade deste método na seleção de plantas resistentes. Este método também permitiu a avaliação da presença do vírus nas folhas inoculadas e em folhas superiores não inoculadas, indicando que o mecanismo de resistência da linhagem 486-1 poderá estar atuando nas folhas inferiores inoculadas, não havendo translocação viral para as folhas superiores.
Palavras-chave: Lycopersicon esculentum, inoculação, resistência, screening, geminivírus.
In tropical and subtropical countries, begomoviruses cause serious problems to tomato. The major symptoms after begomovirus infection are yellow mosaic, mottling, rugosity and leaf distortion, resulting in reduction of the number of flowers, fruits, fruit weight and quality. This disease is known to be transmitted by whiteflies (Bemisia tabaci). Transmission of the virus by mechanical inoculation is sporadically successful, hence, in nature the dissemination of this disease agent is supposed to hardly ever occur by mechanical means. The first report on the incidence of begomovirus-like disease in tomatoes in Brazil occurred in the 60's (Flores et al., 1960), and later confirmed as the begomovirus Tomato golden mosaic virus (TGMV) (Matyis et al., 1975). Costa et al. (1984; 1987) described tomato infected with whitefly-transmitted geminiviruses, but their identification was not carried out and remains unknown. The expansion of begomovirus diseases on tomato was only observed during the last decade (Giordano et al., 1999). The characterization of these begomoviruses and the breeding programs aiming to introgress genes for begomovirus resistance on tomato plants are ongoing in various laboratories.
The strategy to control this disease using resistant cultivars focuses mainly on the introgression of resistance genes into tomato commercial cultivars. The introduction of the resistance using transgenic plants is a new approach to develop plants resistant to diseases. However, the current transgenic strategies introducing viral or anti-viral genes into a plant have some disadvantages such as the narrow resistance spectrum to specific virus species, and also some technical and political constraints. Besides, the conventional methods of plant breeding by inter- and intra-species crosses are viable approaches due to the availability of a large range of resistance genes in the genus Lycopersicon. Some level of resistance to Tomato yellow leaf curl virus (TYLCV) was already reported in L. pimpinellifolium, L. cheesmani, L. hirsutum, L. peruvianum and L. chilense (Kasrawi et al., 1988; Pilowsky & Cohen, 1974; Picó et al., 1996; 1998; Scott et al., 1996).
The main limitation for screening resistant plants is related to the inoculation method. Evaluation of plant resistance to a virus is frequently based on mechanical inoculations. However, the systemic infection of tomato begomoviruses by mechanical inoculation is sporadic. Therefore, mechanical inoculation is not a reliable method for screening tomato plants for begomovirus resistance. The particle bombardment method could be a highly efficient option. However, this method requires special equipment and is not suitable for inoculating great numbers of plants. With this method of inoculation it is difficult to control the inoculation pressure in each plant, an important factor to achieve uniformity of infection. Agroinfection is an alternative method, however due to the same reasons mentioned above, it is also not suitable for screening plants for resistance.
Inoculation of begomovirus using whitefly as vectors appears to be the best method at this moment. Hence, it became important to develop a practical and reliable method of begomovirus inoculation using whiteflies. This study introduces a convenient inoculation method, which enables the application of a uniform inoculation pressure to the plants.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
Preparation of viruliferous whiteflies using the Tube-cage
Newly emerged whitefly adults with a maximum age of 48 h were collected using a sucking apparatus from the colonies established on healthy poinsettia plants. A polypropylene tube of 50 ml (Corning) containing a detached infected tomato plant apex (isolate DFM, Tomato mottle leaf curl virus, Inoue-Nagata et al., 2006) was attached at the end of the sucking apparatus and the whiteflies were released inside the tube. This new Tube-cage was then covered with a whitefly-proof nylon screen and tightly screw-capped (Figure 1).
Tomato inoculation using the Ring-cage
Three, five or ten viruliferous whiteflies previously prepared using the Tube-cage method (for virus acquisition) were transferred into the newly developed leaf-cages (Figure 2) settled onto the abaxial side of tomato seedlings leaves cv. Viradoro. Tomato plants at four true-leaf staged were used for the inoculation. The whiteflies were placed in contact with the leaves of the plants to be evaluated for disease reaction using a Ring-cage. The inoculation access period was 48 h. The limited space inside the cage forces the insect to feed on the plants to be tested, increasing the efficiency of virus transmission. After 48 h of incubation at room temperature, the whiteflies were eliminated by spraying the insecticide Confidor (imidacloprid, Bayer). The inoculated plants were incubated in the greenhouse up to one month for symptom development. Leaf disks were collected from the inoculated plants to confirm virus infection and tested by dot blot hybridization according to Santos et al. (2004).
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Number of whiteflies used in the inoculation procedure
Forty-eight hours after inoculation the mortality of the whiteflies was low (averaging 10% for both ten and five whitefly inoculation cohorts, and 16.7% for three whitefly inoculation cohort). All the plants inoculated with ten (6/6) and three whiteflies (6/6) were infected within one month. Only one out of six plants was not infected when five viruliferous whiteflies were used. Since all six plants inoculated with three viruliferous whiteflies were infected with begomovirus, the use of three whiteflies per plant for inoculation was demonstrated to be appropriate for most purposes.
The application of the method for the pre-screening test
In order to test the usefulness of this method for screening, two tomato lines were tested, 'Viradoro', the susceptible cultivar, and the tomato line 468-1, previously selected for resistance to the virus (Santana et al., 1998; 2001). Ten plants of '468-1' and eight of 'Viradoro' were inoculated using three whiteflies. The development of symptom was observed and recorded weekly. The number of infected plants of 'Viradoro' and '468-1', based on symptom development and dot-blot hybridization, are presented in Table 1. Based upon symptom development, tomato plants ´Viradoro' showed a high infection rate (7/8). On the other hand, tomato line ´468-1' showed only one plant with symptom. To confirm the virus infection, dot blot hybridization was employed using the leaf materials collected 28 days after inoculation. Seven out of eight plants of ´Viradoro' showed positive signals and two out of ten tomato plants of the line ´468-1' showed positive infection (data not shown). The result indicated that the procedure could differentiate distinct levels of virus susceptibility (resistance) occurring in tomato varieties.
The virus distribution and the development of the infection process in tomato plants can define the mechanism of resistance. One type of resistance, for instance, is related to long distance virus migration in plants. The virus can replicate in the inoculated leaf but is not able to translocate in the whole plant. Since this method allows the differentiation of the inoculated leaf from the non-inoculated ones on a single plant basis, the inoculated leaf and one top leaf were collected separately for both tomato germplasm during a 28-day period. Four plants of each line were separated and the presence of virus was evaluated at 7, 14, 21, and 28 days after inoculation by dot blot hybridization (Figure 3). The virus was detected in the inoculated and in the non-inoculated leaves (top) of ´Viradoro' within 14 days after inoculation (a.i.) (Figure 3). The virus could also be detected in these leaves up to 28 days a.i. No positive signals were obtained from samples of the inoculated and of the top leaves, when tomato ´468-1' was used as test plants. These results suggested that the resistance involved in tomato ´468-1' is not related to the inhibition of long-distance migration of the virus, but most probably with cell-to-cell movement or within even in earlier stages of virus infection. For the Ty-1 gene (tolerance to Tomato yellow leaf curl virus TYLCV) the resistance, at low titer inoculum, is expressed through a significant reduction of the viral accumulation in the inoculated tissue, and at high titer inoculum through a significant limitation of the long-distance translocation of the virus (Michelson et al., 1994). However for the same virus, a different tomato line neither developed disease symptoms nor accumulated high virus titer (Friedmann et al., 1998).
The use of polypropylene (PP) tube cage for virus acquisition and leaf cage for inoculation provided important alternative methods for the improvement of whitefly mediated inoculation during the screening procedure. The PP tube cage with infected leaves was a very effective method for obtaining viruliferous whiteflies. The leaf cage allows the utilization of only three viruliferous whiteflies per plant for proceeding with the inoculation process. It is also worthwhile to observe that the protocol takes a very short time to prepare the viruliferous whiteflies. In addition, this procedure makes inoculation pressure much more uniform and the results more reliable. This inoculation procedure proved to be an efficient and easy method, and demanding a small numbers of whiteflies individuals. Furthermore, it turned out to be a good tool to study the mechanism of begomovirus resistance on tomato.
We are grateful to Élcio Vieira da Silva Lopes (in memorian) for his technical assistance.
COSTA AS. 1974. Moléstias do tomateiro transmitidos por mosca branca Bemisia tabaci. Fitopatologia (Lima) 9: 47. [ Links ]
COSTA CL; CHOUDHURY MM; KITAJIMA EW; SILVA NR. 1987. Doença do tipo " curl" constatada em tomatais da região de Petrolina, em Pernambuco. Fitopatologia Brasileira 12: 155. [ Links ]
FLORES E; SILBERSCHMIDT K; KRAMER M. 1960. Observações de " clorose infecciosa" das malváceas em tomateiros do campo. O Biológico 26: 65-69. [ Links ]
FRIEDMANN M; LAPIDOT M; COHEN S; PILOWSKY M. 1998. A novel source of resistance to Tomato Yellow Leaf Curl virus exhibiting a symptomless reaction to viral infection. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science 123: 1004-1007. [ Links ]
GIORDANO LB; BEZERRA IC; FERREIRA PTO; BORGES NETO CR. 1999. Breeding tomatoes for resistance to whitefly-transmited Geminivirus with bipartite genome in Brazil. Acta Horticulturae 487: 357-360. [ Links ]
INOUE-NAGATA AK; MARTIN D; BOITEUX LS; GIORDANO LB; BEZERRA IC; ÁVILA AC. Evidence for new viral species emergence via recombination among isolates of the Brazilian tomato-infecting Begomovirus complex. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira, no prelo. [ Links ]
KASRAWI MA; SUWWAN MA; MANSOUR A. 1988. Sources of resistance to tomato yellow leaf curl virus in Lycopersicon species. Euphytica 37: 61-64. [ Links ]
MATYIS JC; SILVA DM; OLIVEIRA AR; COSTA AS. 1975. Purificação e morfologia do vírus do mosaico dourado do tomateiro. Summa Phytopathologica 1: 267-275. [ Links ]
MICHELSON I; ZAMIR D; CHOSNEK H. 1994. Accumulation and translocation of Tomato Yellow Leaf Curl Virus (TYLCV) in a Lycopersicon esculentum breeding line containing the L. chilense TYLCV tolerance gene Ty-1. Phytopathology 34: 928-933. [ Links ]
PICÓ B; JOSÉ DÍEZ MA; NUEZ F. 1996. Viral diseases causing the greatest economic losses to the tomato crop. II. The tomato yellow leaf curl virus a review. Scientia Horticulturae 67: 151-196. [ Links ]
PICÓ B; JOSÉ DÍEZ MA; NUEZ F. 1998. Evaluation of whitefly-mediated inoculation techniques to screen Lycopersicon esculentum and wild relatives for resistance to Tomato yellow leaf curl virus. Euphytica 101: 259-271. [ Links ]
PILOWSKY M; COHEN S. 1974. Inheritance of resistance to tomato yellow leaf curl virus. Phytopathology 64: 632-635. [ Links ]
SANTANA FM, RIBEIRO SG; MOREIRA JUNIOR D; GIORDANO LB. 1998. Evaluation of tomatoes with resistance to a bipartite begomovirus from the Federal District and Pernambuco. in Congresso Latino Americano e do Caribe sobre Mosca-branca e Geminivírus, Recife, PE. [ Links ]
SANTANA FM; RIBEIRO SG; MOITA AW; MOREIRA JUNIOR DJ; GIORDANO LB. 2001. Sources of resistance in Lycopersicon spp. to a bipartite whitefly-transmitted geminivirus from Brazil. Euphytica 122: 45-51. [ Links ]
SANTOS CDG; AVILA AC; INOUE-NAGATA AK; RESENDE RO. 2004. Plant species hosts of begomovirus obtained from tomato in Goiás and Federal District of Brazil. Fitopatologia. Brasileira 29: 450-455. [ Links ]
SCOTT JW; STEVENS MR; BARTEN JHM; THOME CR; POLSTON JE; SCHUSTER DJ; SERRA CA. 1996. Introgression of resistance to whitefly-transmitted begomoviruses from Lycopersicon chilense to tomato. In: D GERLING RT. Mayer (Ed.). Bemisia: 1995, taxonomy, biology, damage, control and management. Andover: Intercept, p.357-377. [ Links ]
(Recebido para publicação em 7 de janeiro de 2006; aceito em 25 de julho de 2007)