Services on Demand
- Cited by SciELO
- Access statistics
- Cited by Google
- Similars in SciELO
- Similars in Google
On-line version ISSN 1678-4162
Arq. Bras. Med. Vet. Zootec. vol.63 no.1 Belo Horizonte Feb. 2011
Cryotop no desenvolvimento de oócitos bovinos imaturos vitrificados
H. HajarianI; H. WahidI,*; Y. RosninaI; M. DaliriII; M. DashtizadI; H. KaramishabankarehIII; O. Abas MazniIV
IFaculty of Veterinary Medicine - Universiti Putra Malaysia 43400 - Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia
IIDepartment of Animal Biotechnology, National Institute of Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology - Tehran, Iran
IIIDepartment of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture - Razi University - Kermanshah, Iran
IVAgro-Biotechnology Institute - Serdang, Malaysia
The effectiveness of different cryodevices (open-pulled straw (OPS), electron microscopy grid (EMG), and Cryotop was evaluated for vitrification of immature bovine oocytes. Polar body, metaphase II stage (MII), survivability, and subsequent developmental rates were determined. Only oocytes with four or five layers of cumulus cells were used. Oocytes were equilibrated in two vitrification solutions - 1: 10% DMSO + 10% ethylene glycol (EG) for 30-45sec and 2: 20% DMSO + 20% EG +0.5M sucrose for 25sec -, mounted on one of the cryodevices and directly plunged into liquid nitrogen for 10 days. Immature vitrified oocytes using Cryotop showed the highest rates of polar body extrusion (PB) and nuclear maturity (MII); 41 and 58% respectively. Vitrified oocytes using OPS and EMG showed 26 and 32%; and 35 and 46% of PB and MII rates, respectively. The highest survivability resulted from Cryotop and EMG groups and no significant difference was found between them. Vitrified oocytes using Cryotop had the highest cleavage and blastocyst rates. All of the mean rates for vitrified immature oocytes were significantly lower than that of control group (P<0.05). The results of this study showed the superiority of Cryotop device for vitrification of immature bovine oocytes.
Keywords: bovine, immature oocyte, vitrification, cryodevice
Avaliou-se a eficácia de diferentes dispositivos de congelamento (envasamento em palhetas (EP), microscopia eletrônica de grade (MEG) e Cryotop) para vitrificação de ovócitos imaturos de bovinos. Para tal, foram determinados o corpo polar, a metáfase II (MII), a viabilidade e as subsequentes taxas de desenvolvimento. Foram utilizados somente ovócitos com quatro ou cinco camadas de células do cumulus. Os ovócitos foram equilibrados em duas soluções de vitrificação - 1: DMSO (10%) + etilenoglicol (EG; 10%) por 30 a 45 segundos e 2: DMSO (20%) + EG (20%) + sacarose (0,5M) por 25 segundos -, transferidos para os dispositivos de congelamento e mantidos, por 10 dias, em nitrogênio líquido. Imediatamente após serem retirados do nitrogênio, os ovócitos foram removidos dos dispositivos e processados para maturação, fertilização e cultivo in vitro. Os ovócitos vitrificados com o Cryotop apresentaram as maiores taxas de extrusão do corpo polar (CP) e de maturidade nuclear (MII), 41 e 58%, respectivamente. Para os ovócitos vitrificados com EP e MEG, as taxas de CP e as de MII foram, respectivamente, de 26 e 32% e de 35 e 46%. As taxas de viabilidade não diferiram entre os grupos Cryotop e EMG. Os ovócitos vitrificados com Cryotop apresentaram as maiores taxas de clivagem e de blastocisto. Para todas as variáveis estudadas, as taxas para os ovócitos vitrificados foram significativamente menores do que as do grupo-controle (P<0,05). Os resultados deste estudo mostraram a superioridade do dispositivo Cryotop para vitrificação de ovócitos imaturos de bovinos.
Palavras-chave: bovino, oócito imaturo, vitrificação, dispositivos de congelamento
In 1985, vitrification emerged as another option for cryopreservation of cells and organs (Rall and Fahy, 1985). Formation of ice crystals is totally prevented in vitrification procedures using two main strategies: exceedingly high cooling/warming rates and highly viscose and concentrated vitrification solution (Smorag and Gajda, 1994; Vajta and Kuwayama, 2006). Some strategies such as reduction of vitrification solution volume (minimum volume, <1µL) and direct contact with liquid nitrogen or slush liquid nitrogen help to obtain necessary high cooling/warming rates (Yavin and Arav, 2007). The minimum volume-direct contact approach has been employed for cryopreservation of extremely chill sensitive Drosophila eggs by loading them on electron microscopy grids (Mazur et al., 1992). Later on, Kuwayama et al. (2005a) invented the Cryotop method with the same technology like electron microscopy grid. The Cryotop technology allows loading of oocytes or embryos with minimum vitrification solution. Direct contact of minimized vitrification solution (~0.1µL) to liquid nitrogen results in exceedingly high cooling rate (>23,000ºC). Thereafter, the danger zone temperatures (15ºC to -5ºC) which attribute in chilling injury are easily skipped. Furthermore, minimizing of vitrification solution around the sample and direct contact facilitate achieving of extremely high warming rates (>42,000ºC), which has been found that it is more important to be fast enough and prevent devitrification at the time of warming (Isachenko et al., 2005a; Isachenko et al., 2005b). Cryotop have shown its superiority to OPS for vitrification of immature pig (Liu et al., 2008), human (Kuwayama et al., 2005b), and matured bovine oocytes (Morato et al., 2008), but there is still a gap of information for vitrification of immature bovine oocytes using different cryodevices.
Other issues that may profoundly affect the vitrification results are the species and developmental stages of oocyte or embryos. The reason is that permeability and sensitivity of gametes and embryos are different with relation to the species and developmental stages (Hochi et al., 1998; Men et al., 2002; Magnusson et al., 2008). Previous studies have shown that MII bovine oocytes have greater permeability to cryoprotectants and water than GV oocytes (Agca et al., 1998).
The aim of the present study is to compare the efficiency of three cryodevices namely open-pulled straw (OPS), electron microscopy grid (EMG), and Cryotop on the viability, cleavage, and blastocyst rates of immature bovine oocytes.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
Unless otherwise indicated, all chemicals were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA).
Ovaries were collected from local abattoirs and transported to the laboratory within three hours at 34-36ºC in phosphate-buffer saline (PBS; P-4417) containing penicillin-streptomycin (100,000IU of penicillin and 100mg of streptomycin per liter). Cumulus-oocyte complexes (COC) were obtained by slicing method in tissue culture medium 199 (Medium199, 12340; Gibco) containing 25mM HEPES, Earl's salts, L-glutamine, and 2mg/mL sodium bicarbonate modified by the addition of 4mg/mL bovine serum albumin (BSA, fraction V, A-3311) and gentamycin 50µg/mL (G-1264).
Recovered oocytes were washed twice in holding solution (HS, Hepes-buffered TCM medium supplemented with 20% fetal calf serum, FCS) and kept there for about 15min. Groups of four COC were incubated in the first vitrification solution (VS1: 10% DMSO and 10% EG in WS) for 35-40sec and then transferred to the second vitrification solution (VS2: 20% DMSO, 20% EG, and 0.5M sucrose in WS) for 25sec. Instantly, oocytes were loaded on cryodevices including OPS, EMG, and Cryotop (Kitazato Supply Co, Fujinomiya, Japan) and submerged into liquid nitrogen (LN2) for storage. The time of exposure from VS2 to LN2 was not longer than 30s. Vitrified samples were maintained in LN2 for at least 10 days.
Immediately after removing of cryodevices from LN2, they were submerged in 3-mL pre-warmed (39ºC) HS plus 0.25M sucrose (T1) and smoothly tried to remove oocytes from cryodevices. Immature oocytes were left in T1 for 5min and then transferred to HS plus 0.15M sucrose solution for 5min. Finally, the immature oocytes were washed twice in HM for 5min each and processed for in vitro maturation, fertilization, and culture.
Immature oocytes were washed two times in medium 199 supplemented with 4mg/mL BSA and washed again in maturation solution containing Hepes-buffered medium 199 supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum, 0.2mM sodium pyruvate (P-5280), 50µL/mL Gentamycin (G-1264), and 1µg/mL oestradiol-17β (E-8875). Approximately 20-30 oocytes were incubated in 400µL of maturation solution under mineral oil in 4-well plates for 22-24h at 38.5ºC under 5% CO2 atmosphere with high humidity. The vitrified BCB-test separated oocytes also underwent the same maturation process with control group after warming.
For the purpose of maturation determination, 24 hours after maturation, oocytes were denuded using 0.1% (w/v) hyaluronidase (Type 1-S) in Hepes-buffered medium 199 by vortexing. The cumulus-free oocytes were fixed in aceto-ethanol mixture (1:3, v/v) at 5ºC for 24 hours. Once fixed, oocytes in groups from five to 10 were mounted on slides. Cover-slip with four spots of silicon glued at the corners was gently pressed down until it touched and secured the oocytes. Afterward, aceto-lacmoid stain was passed under the cover-slip and remained there for 5min followed by staining. A decolorizing solution (aceto-glycerol) was passed through to remove the stain residuals. Stained oocytes were examined under stereomicroscope (40x) for determination of nuclear stages.
The fertilization method was previously described by Parrish et al. (1988) with some modifications. Briefly, matured oocytes were washed three times in tyrode's albumin lactate pyruvate buffered with HEPES (Talp-Hepes) and twice in fertilization medium. Viable spermatozoa were obtained by centrifugation of frozen-thawed spermatozoa on Bovipure (Nidacon International AB, Gothenburg, Sweden) discontinuous density gradient (2mL of top-layer over 2mL of bottom-layer) for 20min at 300 x g at room temperature. Viable spermatozoa, collected at the bottom of the tube, were washed with 5mL of sperm-TALP supplemented by 6mg/mL BSA (fraction V, A-3311) and centrifuged for 10min at 300 x g. After centrifugation, 150µL of the pellet were selected. Spermatozoa were counted in a hemacytometer and diluted in the appropriate volume of IVF-Talp to give a concentration of 1x106 spermatozoa/mL. IVM-oocytes were transferred in groups of up to seven into 50µL of fertilization solution supplemented with 10 µg/mL heparin-sodium salt (Sigma, H-3393). Spermatozoa suspension was added to each fertilization droplet. Oocytes and sperms were incubated for 18h at 38.5ºC in 5% CO2 in humidified air.
Eighteen hours after IVF, oocytes were freed of cumulus cells by high speed vortexing and washed twice in Talp-Hepes and culture medium. For each well, 10-15 oocytes were transferred to 400µL of synthetic oviductal fluid (SOFaaci) supplemented with 5% adult bovine serum (B-9433) and 1µg/mL gentamycin under mineral oil. Every two days after transfer to culture medium, 200µL of culture medium were replenished with 200µL fresh incubated SOF medium. Cleavage and blastocyst rates were recorded at 48h, seven and nine days post insemination, respectively.
Two experiments were performed to find out the in vitro viability of immature oocytes after vitrification using EMG, cryotop, and OPS. In the first experiment, some of the vitrified/warmed immature oocytes were matured and freed of cumulus cells at 22-24h of maturation. Oocytes were monitored for the presence of polar body. Afterward, the oocytes were fixed and stained. Nuclear maturation stages for each group were determined under the light microscope. In the second experiment, survivability, cleavage (>8-cell), and blastocyst rates were evaluated at 24h after IVM, 40-48h post insemination (hpi), 4-5 days post insemination (dpi), and 7-10 dpi, respectively.
All experiments were repeated six times. Significant differences among treatments were revealed by non parametric one-way analysis of variance followed by Duncan's multiple range test for mean comparisons (P<0.05) using SAS software ver. 9.1 (SAS Inst., Cary, NC).
Polar body assessment of denuded oocytes revealed that vitrification using Cryotop increased the percentage of oocytes with extruded polar body (P<0.05; Table 1). Polar body rate was significantly lower in Cryotop when compared with control group (P<0.05). Although degeneration happened in higher rate in OPS group (P<0.05), control group showed the least degeneration followed by Cryotop. There was no significant difference regarding the absence of polar body (PB-) between OPS, Cryotop, and EMG groups (P>0.05), but control group represented the lowest percentage of PB- compared with other groups (P<0.05; Table 1).
Vitrified/warmed immature oocytes in Cryotop group were seen in MII stage of maturation (58%), significantly higher compared with EMG and OPS groups (46% and 35%, respectively). Oocytes in Cryotop and EMG groups tended to pursue their maturation and had less germinal vesicle (GV) stage oocytes in comparison to OPS group (P<0.05; Table 2). There was no significant difference in percentage of GVBD-MI among all groups. In comparison with the other groups, the least GV and GVBD-MI rate resulted from control group (P<0.05).
Table 3 provides the results obtained from viability, cleavage (>8 cells), and blastocyst rates of vitrified/warmed immature bovine oocytes. It is apparent from this table that oocytes from Cryotop and EMG group (90% and 89%, respectively) had significantly higher viability compared with OPS group (79%; P<0.05). However, viability rate of control group (100%) was significantly higher than treated groups. Some of the treated oocytes lost their survivability during IVF. Presence of multiple spermatozoa in the perivitelline space of vitrified/warmed oocytes was also noticeable. The rate of cleaved oocytes was significantly higher in the Cryotop group (40.21±4.21%) compared to EMG and OPS (33.29±1.35 and 30.94±1.61, respectively), but there was no difference between EMG and OPS groups. Developmental rate of embryos to 8-cell or beyond was significantly higher (P<0.05) in Cryotop group (23.33±1.62%) than other groups (17.15±3.22%, 12.91±2.00% for OPS and EMG, respectively). Although, no significant difference in blastocyst formation was revealed among treated groups (P<0.05), Cryotop resulted in higher percentage of blastocyst rate compared with other groups (P>0.05; Table 3). All of the mean rates for vitrified/warmed immature oocytes were significantly lower than that of control group (P<0.05).
In this study, three efficient cryodevices used for vitrification of immature bovine oocytes were compared. The reason was to standardize usage of a cryodevice, which results in a higher cooling/warming rate, better protection, and higher viability after warming. Cryotop resulted in higher viability compared to other treated groups.
Survivability of immature bovine oocytes was assessed by recovery of oocytes after warming, existence of polar body, and by staining for nuclear maturation. Nuclear maturation rate of vitrified immature oocytes by Cryotop device was comparably higher than other cryodevices demonstrating the ability of immature oocytes to survive vitrification. Nuclear maturity of vitrified immature bovine oocytes were comparably lower in previous published studies (Cetin and Bastan, 2006; Yamada et al., 2007) than in this experiment.
Two major obstacles which are overcome by vitrification procedure are ice crystal formation and chilling injury (Vajta and Kuwayama, 2006). Chilling injury mostly affects cytoskeleton and cell membranes including oolema and membrane of organelles (Morato et al., 2008). For vitrification process and prevention of intracellular ice formation, two main approaches are necessary, which are high concentrations of permeating cryoprotectants (CPA, around 6-8M) and high cooling/warming rates. The higher viability resulted from Cryotop and EMG represents improvements over the rates obtained by OPS device and can be attributed to the higher cooling/warming rates obtained using the Cryotop and EMG technologies. EMG has been employed for cryopreservation of extremely chill sensitive Drosophila eggs by loading them on EMG (Mazur et al., 1992). It has been said that the basis of Cryotop device was obtained from EMG device. On the other hand, the Cryotop technology (Kuwayama et al., 2005a) allows loading of oocytes or embryos with minimum vitrification solution. Even after mounting of sample on Cryotop, the excessive amount of vitrification solution is aspirated. Direct contact of minimized vitrification solution (~0.1µL) to liquid nitrogen results in exceedingly high cooling rate (>23,000ºC). Thereafter, the danger zone temperatures (15 to -5ºC) which attributed in chilling injury are easily skipped. Furthermore, minimizing of vitrification solution around the sample facilitates achieving of extremely high warming rates (>42,000ºC), which has been found that it is more important to be fast enough and prevent devitrification at the time of warming (Isachenko et al., 2005a; Isachenko et al., 2005b).
The percentage of cleaved oocytes and >8cell-embryos were higher in Cryotop followed by EMG. Hence, it seems that Cryotop could better preserve the cell structure and consequently fertilization capacity of vitrified immature oocytes. However, these results were significantly lower than those of fresh immature oocytes (control group). This reduction in cleavage rate of EMG group oocytes and subsequent development of them might be a result of mishandling of the device in which the EMG is tiny and has to be delicately handled. At the time of warming, some of them were positioned face down and subsequently damaged the oocytes. During that time, EMG should be handled using a fine forceps, pre-equilibrated in liquid nitrogen. In some cases, because of boiling of liquid nitrogen and searching for tiny grid and also transmission of body temperature to the forceps, its temperature goes up, and at the time of grabbing the grid, which creates a temperature shock and may cause devitrification. These results therefore need to be interpreted with caution.
Although the percentage of blastocyst formation was not significantly different, Cryotop resulted in higher blastocyst rate and showed its superiority over the other two cryodevices. However, comparison of blastocyst formation among treated groups and fresh group indicated that damage resulted from vitrification could compromise the viability and subsequent development of the vitrified immature oocytes. These results are consistent with the results from Morato et al. (2008) and Chian et al. (2004) which reported the superiority of Cryotop versus OPS.
In conclusion, the minimum volume-direct contact approach employed for Cryotop technology may provide enough support for vitrification of immature bovine oocytes. Further studies to employ Cryotop technology using its improved vitrification solution needs to be performed, which may provide better environment for vitrification of immature bovine oocytes and its subsequent development.
This research was supported by a grant from the National Institute of Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology (NIGEB), Ministry of Science, Technology, and Innovation, Iran (vote no. 382), - Dr. Morteza Daliri.
AGCA, Y.; MONSON, R.L.; NORTHEY, D.L. et al. Normal calves from transfer of biopsied sexed and vitrified IVP bovine embryos. Theriogenology, v.50, p.129-145, 1998. [ Links ]
CETIN, Y.; BASTAN, A. Cryopreservation of immature bovine oocytes by vitrification in straws. Anim. Reprod. Sci., v.92, p.29-36, 2006. [ Links ]
CHIAN, R.-C.; KUWAYAMA, M.; TAN, L. et al. High survival rate of bovine oocytes matured in vitro following vitrification. J. Reprod. Dev., v.50, p.685-696, 2004. [ Links ]
HOCHI, S.; ITO, K.; HIRABAYASHI, M. et al. Effect of nuclear stages during IVM on the survival of vitrified-warmed bovine oocytes. Theriogenology, v.49, p.787-796, 1998. [ Links ]
ISACHENKO, V.; MONTAG, M.; ISACHENKO, E. et al. Vitrification of mouse pronuclear embryos after polar body biopsy without direct contact with liquid nitrogen. Fert. Steril., v.84, p.1011-1016, 2005a. [ Links ]
ISACHENKO, V.; MONTAG, M.; ISACHENKO, E. et al. Aseptic technology of vitrification of human pronuclear oocytes using open-pulled straws. Hum. Reprod., v.20, p.492-496, 2005b. [ Links ]
KUWAYAMA, M.; VAJTA, G.; KATO, O. et al. Highly efficient vitrification method for cryopreservation of human oocytes. Reprod. Biomed. Online, v.11, p.300-308, 2005a. [ Links ]
KUWAYAMA, M.; VAJTA, G.; KATO, O. et al. Highly efficient vitrification method for cryopreservation of human oocytes. Reprod. Biomed. Online, v.11, p.300-308, 2005b. [ Links ]
LIU, Y.; DU, Y.; LIN, L. et al. Comparison of efficiency of open pulled straw (OPS) and Cryotop vitrification for cryopreservation of in vitro matured pig oocytes. CryoLetters, v.29, p.315-320, 2008. [ Links ]
MAGNUSSON, V.; FEITOSA, W.B.; GOISSIS, M.D. et al. Bovine oocyte vitrification: Effect of ethylene glycol concentrations and meiotic stages. Anim. Reprod. Sci., v.106, p.265-273, 2008. [ Links ]
MAZUR, P.; COLE, K.; HALL, J. et al. Cryobiological preservation of Drosophila embryos. Science, v.258, p.1932-1935, 1992. [ Links ]
MEN, H.; MONSON, R.L.; RUTLEDGE, J.J. Effect of meiotic stages and maturation protocols on bovine oocyte's resistance to cryopreservation. Theriogenology, v.57, p.1095-1103, 2002. [ Links ]
MORATO, R.; IZQUIERDO, D.; PARAMIO, M.T. et al. Cryotops versus open-pulled straws (OPS) as carriers for the cryopreservation of bovine oocytes: effects on spindle and chromosome configuration and embryo development. Cryobiology, v.57, p.137-141, 2008. [ Links ]
PARRISH, J.J.; SUSKO-PARRISH, J.; WINER, M.A. et al. Capacitation of bovine sperm by heparin. Biol. Reprod., v.38, p.1171-1180, 1988. [ Links ]
RALL, W.F.; FAHY, G.M. Ice-free cryopreservation of mouse embryos at -196 [deg]C by vitrification. Nature, v.313, p.573-575, 1985. [ Links ]
SMORAG, Z.; GAJDA, B. Cryopreservation of mammalian ova and embryos by vitrification. Biotech. Adv., v.12, p.449-465, 1994. [ Links ]
VAJTA, G.; KUWAYAMA, M. Improving cryopreservation systems. Theriogenology, v.65, p.236-244, 2006. [ Links ]
YAMADA, C.; CAETANO, H.V.A.; SIMÕES, R. et al. Immature bovine oocyte cryopreservation: Comparison of different associations with ethylene glycol, glycerol and dimethylsulfoxide. Anim. Reprod. Sci., v.99, p.384-388, 2007. [ Links ]
YAVIN, S.; ARAV, A. Measurement of essential physical properties of vitrification solutions. Theriogenology, v.67, p.81-89, 2007. [ Links ]
Recebido em 19 de julho de 2010
Aceito em 10 de janeiro de 2011