SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.31 suppl.1Debate on the paper by Diez RouxDebate on the paper by Diez Roux author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

Share


Cadernos de Saúde Pública

Print version ISSN 0102-311XOn-line version ISSN 1678-4464

Cad. Saúde Pública vol.31  supl.1 Rio de Janeiro Nov. 2015

http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0102-311XCO02S115 

DEBATE

Debate on the paper by Diez Roux

Debate sobre o artigo de Diez Roux

Debate acerca del artículo de Diez Roux

Paulo Saldiva1  2 

Nilmara de Oliveira Alves2 

Mariana Veras3  5 

1Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brasil.

2Instituto Nacional de Análise Integrada do Risco Ambiental, São Paulo, Brasil. pepino@usp.br

2Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brasil. nilmaraoalves@gmail.com

3Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brasil.

5Instituto Nacional de Análise Integrada do Risco Ambiental, São Paulo, Brasil. verasine@gmail.com

Addressing the complexity of urban living: a new opportunity to improve public health

The paper by Diez Roux addresses the need to employ a systemic approach to understand urban health determinants, a basic condition for creating solid and positive public health policies. Cities are increasingly becoming human beings’ natural habitat. Throughout history, urban living was consistently associated with adverse health conditions. Poor sanitation in crowded human settlements provided the perfect scenario for the development of cholera and other enteric diseases. In cities, yellow fever, smallpox, and bubonic plague killed millions of people. Cities also created the conditions for modern epidemiology after John Snow controlled a cholera outbreak in London by closing down a public water well 1. Thus, cities have long demanded an ecosystem approach to improve public health, mostly focused on infectious diseases. Today’s cities face new health problems, since chronic non-communicable diseases are more prevalent in urban areas and are modified by them. Mental illness, obesity, diabetes, cardiovascular disease, and cancer all display an urban-rural risk gradient 2,3,4. To address these questions, health professionals are again facing the need to think and plan actions based on ecosystem premises. In fact, health should be considered a primary delineator of urban development and management, and health professionals must engage in the process of adding to Plato’s utopian ideal city based on politics, ethics, and social relations, a fourth parameter: human health 5,6.

Worldwide, nearly 17.5 million people die per year from cardiovascular diseases 7. Chronic non-communicable diseases have multiple factors (genetic, epigenetic, behavioral, and environmental). In this context, conditions that are more frequent in the urban setting such as air pollution, social stress, and climate changes (heat islands, for instance) should be considered important health determinants and included in the policymaking and planning process to effectively contribute to health promotion at all social levels.

Urban agglomerates are responsible for a large share of pollutants. To understand the urban process, we must view cities not simply as places in space but as systems of networks and flows. The “human ecology” concept includes a systems-based approach that enables an integrated view of the urban environment and public health 8,9.

According to William Rouse 10, the Earth is reflected as a collection of different systems on different scales: environment, population, industry, and government (Figure 1).

Figure 1 A systems approach to cities includes four key elements: environment, population, industry, and government. Acting together, this approach allows an integrated view of direct and indirect health impacts. 

Let us explore, for example, the possible paths by which urban living contributes to cardiovascular disease. Cities experienced social and technological changes that ultimately created a dominant human habitat: long time spent in traffic, long working hours, airborne pollutants, stress, and easy access to high-fat/high-sugar/high-sodium foods combined with sedentary lifestyle and poor eating habits. These factors contribute directly or indirectly (by modifying) the risks of heart diseases.

From this perspective, air pollution has become part of modern living, and exposures are associated with numerous manifestations of heart disease, indicating that it not only exacerbates existing heart conditions but also appears to play a role in the development of diseases 11. Air pollution ranks ninth among modifiable disease risk factors, and the risk of air pollution exceeds other well-known risk factors such as physical inactivity, high-sodium diet, high cholesterol, and drug use.

Moreover, the intensification of weather and climate extremes, the most visible impact of global warming on our everyday lives, can contribute to increasing the incidence of myocardial infarction, especially in the elderly 12,13.

Thus, in order to reduce the prevalence of cardiovascular disease, health professionals should face the complexity of the urban system, which encompasses factors not usually viewed as health determinants, such as urban planning, public transportation, and fuel policies. Other simulations could be developed for cancer, obesity, and diabetes, conditions influenced significantly by urban living.

Importantly, different factors (social, behavioral, physiological, environmental, psychological, and lifestyle) interact to determine and affect the health status of individuals and communities in a way that allows many opportunities for positive health interventions, for example, e.g. different public polices for the environment, transportation, and energy generation. This complexity of the urban scenario creates both challenges and opportunities. Diez Roux invites us as health professionals to incorporate a broader and more integrated approach when addressing health problems, so that her article is both timely and necessary.

REFERENCES

1. Paneth N. Assessing the contributions of John Snow to epidemiology: 150 years after removal of the Broad Street pump handle. Epidemiology 2004; 15:514-6. [ Links ]

2. World Health Organization. Global status report on noncommunicable diseases 2010: description of the global burden of NCDs, their risk factors and determinants. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2011. [ Links ]

3. Monroe AC, Ricketts TC, Savitz LA. Cancer in rural versus urban populations: a review. J Rural Health 1992; 8:212-20. [ Links ]

4. Barker DJP. Fetal origins of coronary heart disease. BMJ 1995; 311:171-4. [ Links ]

5. Anstey MHR. Climate change and health: what’s the problem? Global Health 2013; 9:4. [ Links ]

6. Bezirtzoglou C, Dekas K, Charvalos E. Climate changes, environment and infection: facts, scenarios and growing awareness from the public health community within Europe. Anaerobe 2011; 17:337-40. [ Links ]

7. World Health Organization. Global status report on noncommunicable diseases 2014. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2014. [ Links ]

8. Fleming ML, Tenkate T, Gould T. Ecological sustainability: what role for public health education? Int J Environ Res Public Health 2009; 6:2028-40. [ Links ]

9. McMichael AJ. Will considerations of environmental sustainability revitalise the policy links between the urban environment and health? N S W Public Health Bull 2007; 18:41-5. [ Links ]

10. Rouse W. Earth as a system. In: National Research Council, editor. Can Earth’s and society’s systems meet the needs of 10 billion people? Washington DC: The National Academies Press; 2014. p. 20-3. [ Links ]

11. Newby DE, Mannucci PM, Tell GS, Baccarelli AA, Brook RD, Donaldson K, et al. Expert position paper on air pollution and cardiovascular disease. Eur Heart J 2015; 36:83-93b. [ Links ]

12. Guerrero-Bosagna C, Jensen P. Globalization, climate change, and transgenerational epigenetic inheritance: will our descendants be at risk? Clin Epigenetics 2015; 7:8. [ Links ]

13. Madrigano J, Mittleman MA, Baccarelli A, Goldberg R, Melly S, von Klot S, et al. Temperature, myocardial infarction, and mortality: effect modification by individual- and area-level characteristics. Epidemiology 2013; 24:439-46. [ Links ]

Creative Commons License This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.