SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.37 issue2Comparison between self-reported and accelerometer-derived measurements for classifying children and adolescents as physically active in ChileA broad look at public mental health author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

Share


Cadernos de Saúde Pública

Print version ISSN 0102-311XOn-line version ISSN 1678-4464

Cad. Saúde Pública vol.37 no.2 Rio de Janeiro  2021  Epub Feb 22, 2021

https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-311x00003621 

LETTER

COVID-19 pandemic after the vaccine: the importance of continuing to implement basic primary prevention

A pandemia de COVID-19 após a vacina: a importância de continuar a implementar a prevenção primária básica

La pandemia de COVID-19 tras la vacuna: la importancia de continuar implementando prevención primaria básica

1 Department of Anatomical, Histological, Forensic and Orthopaedic Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.


The study of Lima-Costa et al. 1 analyzed the application of social distancing, the use of face masks, and handwashing among participants in the Brazilian Longitudinal Study of Aging (ELSI-Brazil) between May 26 and June 8, 2020. The results show a poor application of social distancing but sufficient use of face masks and handwashing. Therefore, it is useful to assess the importance of these preventive measures after the effective vaccination against SARS-CoV-2.

The COVID-19 pandemic has caused multiple problems worldwide, with severe consequences for national health systems and public health 2,3,4.

Research centers around the world have made considerable efforts to find an effective vaccine against SARS-CoV-2. Nonetheless, a heated bioethical debate concerning the development of the vaccine has taken place. In December 2020, the U.S. Food and Drug Adminsitration (FDA) approved the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine 5. In the same month, the European Medicines Agency (EMA) also approved this vaccine 6. Soon after, in a significant part of the world, mass vaccination programs started.

The Pfizer vaccine (Bnt162b2) is a nucleoside-modified RNA vaccine that encodes a prefusion-stabilized, membrane-anchored SARS-CoV-2 full-length spike protein; it seems that this vaccine can prevent infection with COVID-19 and, to date, it is estimated to be 95% effective 5.

Nevertheless, doubts about the vaccine’s ability to prevent the virus’ spread on its own persist. It is yet unclear whether the immunized subjects will be able to infect other individuals. Therefore, it is impossible to say whether the vaccinated citizens will develop any asymptomatic infections and transmit SARS-CoV-2 7.

A public health issue of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine relates to the need for two doses within 21 days to reach a preventive efficacy of about 95% 5. Thus, for this timeframe, the vaccinated subject will still be exposed and can potentially spread the infection. Another public health issue may arise if an increasing number of individuals fail to undergo the second vaccine dose. Finally, it is essential to remember any viral variants could make the vaccine less effective or ineffective.

Thus, it is essential to continue to use the preventive measures that, to date, are the only ones that have guaranteed good results in avoiding the spread of SARS-CoV-2: wearing masks, social distancing, and contact tracing 8. Underestimating the importance of preventive tools could be a dangerous mistake with severe consequences for national health systems. It is imperative to maintain a high level of attention at this critical stage, at least until the effects of vaccination on global health are apparent and herd immunity is reached. The vaccine is currently considered an additional tool in the fight against COVID-19, not its the final solution. As such, there is a risk that the tool that could help us rise above the health crisis causes a boomerang effect with devastating consequences to public health and national health systems.

__________

1. Lima-Costa MF, Mambrini JVM, Andrade FB, Peixoto SWV, Macinko J. Social distancing, use of face masks and hand washing among participants in the Brazilian Longitudinal Study of Aging: the ELSI-COVID-19 initiative. Cad Saúde Pública 2020; 36 Suppl 3:e00193920. [ Links ]

2. Cioffi A. Professional autonomy and liability of the resident doctor: between the hammer and the anvil. J Forensic Leg Med 2020; 72:101965. [ Links ]

3. Montanari Vergallo G, Bersani G, Rinaldi R. CoViD-19 and psychiatry: can mental illness justify further exceptions to the obligation to stay at home? Riv Psichiatr 2020; 55:245-9. [ Links ]

4. Cioffi A, Rinaldi R. COVID-19 and healthcare-associated infections. Int J Risk Saf Med 2020; 31:181-2. [ Links ]

5. FDA Briefing Document. Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine. https://www.fda.gov/media/144245/download (accessed on 10/Dec/2020). [ Links ]

6. EMA recommends first COVID-19 vaccine for authorisation in the EU. https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/news/ema-recommends-first-covid-19-vaccine-authorisation-eu (accessed on 21/Dec/2020). [ Links ]

7. Polack FP, Thomas SJ, Kitchin N, Absalon J, Gurtman A, Lockhart S, et al. Safety and efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine. N Engl J Med 2020; 383:2603-15. [ Links ]

8. Cioffi A. The decline of COVID-19-related deaths and the risk of underestimating the pandemic. Ethics Med Public Health 2020; 15:100601. [ Links ]

Received: January 08, 2021; Accepted: January 15, 2021

Correspondence A. Cioffi Department of Anatomical, Histological, Forensic and Orthopaedic Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome. Viale Regina Elena 336, Rome - 00161, Italy. an.cioffi19@gmail.com

Additional information

ORCID: Andrea Cioffi (0000-0001-5163-9558).

Conflict of interests

The author declares no conflict of interests.

Creative Commons License This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License