SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.23 issue4Paspalum L. (Poaceae: Panicoideae: Paniceae) in Pernambuco state, BrazilGlomus halonatum Rose & Trappe (Glomeromycota) in South America: comments on the morphological characteristics of the species author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

Share


Acta Botanica Brasilica

Print version ISSN 0102-3306

Acta Bot. Bras. vol.23 no.4 São Paulo Dec. 2009

http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0102-33062009000400025 

ARTICLES

 

Flower and fruit development of Parkia pendula (Fabaceae, Mimosoideae)

 

Desenvolvimento de flores e frutos de Parkia pendula (Fabaceae, Mimosoideae)

 

 

Daniel PiechowskiI,1; Gerhard GottsbergerII

IInstitute of Systematic Botany and Ecology, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany
IIBotanical Garden and Herbarium, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany

 

 


ABSTRACT

Parkia pendula occurs in Brazil in Amazonia and in the northeastern Atlantic Forest. In the latter, its buds, nectar, and seedpod gum are discussed to be keystone resources for the mammalian fauna. To enhance the knowledge about these important nourishment sources, the aim of this study was to detect and describe distinct phases in the flower and pod development. The study was conducted in a 306 ha forest fragment in Igarassu, Pernambuco, northeastern Brazil. Six morphometrical variables were measured weekly at five inflorescences of two individuals from September 2003 to January 2004. Eleven distinct developmental phases were identified in the 21 weeks lasting development from the very first inflorescences to mature pods and are described in detail. These phases are good predictors for the flowering and fruiting phenology of P. pendula, since they are easily distinguishable from the forest floor. Furthermore, highly synchronized abortions of inflorescences, buds, and pods were observed which support the previously assumed predator satiation defense strategy in Parkia.

Key words: abortion, Atlantic Forest, keystone resources, mammals, predator satiation


RESUMO

Parkia pendula ocorre no Brasil, tanto na Amazônia como na Mata Atlântica nordestina. Seus botões, néctar e goma da vagem são recursos chave para a mastofauna da Mata Atlântica nordestina. Para aumentar o conhecimento sobre estes importantes recursos alimentares, este estudo teve como objetivo detectar e descrever as diferentes fases de desenvolvimento de flores e frutos. Este trabalho foi realizado em um fragmento de Mata Atlântica de 306 ha em Igarassu, Pernambuco, Nordeste do Brasil. Entre setembro de 2003 e janeiro de 2004, seis variáveis morfométricas foram medidas semanalmente em cinco inflorescências de dois indivíduos. Onze fases distintas de desenvolvimento puderam ser identificadas e descritas em detalhe nas 21 semanas desde o desenvolvimento das primeiras inflorescências até as vagens maduras. Essas fases são boas preditoras da fenologia de floração e frutificação de P. pendula porque são distinguíveis facilmente do solo da floresta. Além disto, a observação de abortos sincronizados de inflorescências, botões e vagens corrobora a estratégia de defesa previamente sugerida para Parkia, de saciedade de predadores.

Palavras-chave: aborto, mamíferos, Mata Atlântica, recursos chaves, saciedade de predadores


 

 

Introduction

Parkia pendula (Willd.) Walp. (Fabaceae, Mimosoideae) is the most widely distributed Neotropical Parkia species (Hopkins 1986). In Brazil, it occurs in Amazonia as well as in the northeastern Atlantic Forest (Hopkins 1986). In the latter, it is a typical and abundant element of the flora with a much higher density than in the Amazonian forests (Ferraz et al. 2004, Guedes 1998, Piechowski & Gottsberger 2008, Siqueira et al. 2001).

Parkia pendula is pollinated by bats. Eleven phyllostomid bat species were recorded visiting P. pendula until now with Phyllostomus discolor Wagner being the main pollinator (Carvalho 1961, Hopkins 1984, Fischer 2000, Rodriguez-H. & Hopkins 2000, Piechowski et al. in press). Hundreds of bats can be encountered at a single flowering P. pendula tree (Hopkins 1984, Piechowski et al. in press). Beside bats, medium-sized non-flying mammals are attracted by the large nectar quantities of P. pendula (Hopkins 1984, Fischer 2000, Piechowski 2007a, b). The flowers are arranged in large capitula that are presented on long, stable axes underneath the flattened crowns, which therefore enables large bats like P. discolor to reach and pollinate the flowers. Two flower types occur at P. pendula capitula: fertile, hermaphrodite flowers as well as sterile, nectar-secreting ones (Piechowski et al. in press).

Beside its fl owers, P. pendula is also known for its unique seed-dispersal mechanism. The pods of P. pendula (together with that of its close congener Parkia paraensis Ducke) secrete large quantities of a sticky amber-colored gum, into which the seeds are released after dehiscence of the pods (Hopkins & Hopkins 1983). Therefore, seed shedding is prolonged for several months and desynchronized between the trees (Oliveira et al. 2006). The gum is a source of protein, carbohydrates, calcium, and magnesium for parrots and primates, which act thereby as seed dispersers (Anderson & Pinto 1985, Peres 2000).

Due to the high attractiveness of nectar and seedpod gum, this tree species is discussed to be a keystone species for the mammalian fauna of northeastern Atlantic Forest fragments (Piechowski 2007b). The goal of the present study was to detect, describe, and quantify distinct phases in the flower and pod development, to enhance the knowledge about these important nourishment sources.

 

Material and methods

Study site - The study was conducted in the 306 ha fragment of Atlantic Forest, locally known as Mata de Piedade (7º50'23''S, 34º59'54''W). This forest is located on the property of the sugarcane factory Usina São José S/A, Igarassu, PE, northeastern Brazil. The climate of this region is characterized by a rainy season from April to August and a dry period from November to December and is therefore noticeably seasonal (CPRH 2003). The annual precipitation is 1,520 mm but shows strong inter-annual and spatial variations (Schessl et al. 2008). The annual air temperature is relatively constant at approximately 25ºC (CPRH 2003, Schessl et al. 2008). The bedrock is a Tertiary conglomerate on beach-ridged terraces of the Barreiras group with a sandy to loamy red-yellow podzolic topsoil (Dominguez et al. 1990, Schessl et al. 2008). The Piedade fragment is mainly located on a plain plateau at an altitude of 110 m, only the northern part and a flooded valley have an altitude of approximately 30 m.

The height of the close canopy is approximately 20 m; some emergent trees reach 35 m in height. Among tree species, there is a tendency towards deciduousness during the dry season, wherefore this forest may be characterized as a semi-evergreen rainforest (Schessl et al. 2008). The trees with the highest importance value indices (IVI) are Tapirira guianensis Aubl. (Anacardiaceae), Pogonophora schomburgkiana Miers ex Benth. (Euphorbiaceae), Sclerolobium densiflorum Benth. (Fabaceae), and Parkia pendula (Silva et al. 2008). The matrix surrounding the Piedade fragment consists of a uniform sugarcane monoculture.

Data collecting - Data were sampled weekly between September 2003 and January 2004 at five inflorescences of two adult P. pendula individuals (dbh: 58.3 and 58.2 cm; height: 16 and 19.5 m, respectively). Access to the inflorescences was achieved using the single rope technique (Barker 1997). To detect distinct developmental phases, the following six morphometrical variables were measured: a) length of the composed inflorescence, b) number of capitula per inflorescence, c) peduncle length, d) capitulum diameter, e) number of pods per capitulum, and f) mean pod length. Morphometrical variables were measured starting in the 6th week of inflorescence development due to the high rate of abortion during the first five weeks. The capitulum diameter was measured with a caliper to the nearest mm; all other variables were measured to the nearest cm using a tape measure. Additionally, the color of all generative structures was determined using the color-plates by Kornerup & Wanscher (1981). Morphological terms were used following Hopkins (1986). Specimens were deposited at the herbarium UFP of the Universidade Federal de Pernambuco (UFPE). Complementary studies on the pollination biology including nectar and scent chemistry were published elsewhere (Piechowski et al. in press).

 

Results

Eleven distinct developmental phases could easily be identified in the 21 weeks lasting development of Parkia pendula from the very first inflorescence buds to mature pods (Fig. 1; Tab. 1) and are described in the following. The inflorescence abortion rate was very high during the first five weeks of bud ripening. Nevertheless, there were clear differences between the inflorescence buds of the first two weeks compared with older ones. During the first two weeks (initial phase), the inflorescence bracts opened. The whole inflorescences were very compact (<5 cm total length) and all capitulum buds were still completely enclosed by capitular bracts (Fig. 1a). The elongating phase (weeks 3-7) was characterized by the elongating of the primary axes of the compound inflorescences whereas the peduncles were still relatively short. The number of capitulum buds (and peduncles) decreased dramatically (Tab. 1) during this fiveweek-lasting period. The capitular bracts of the remaining capitulum buds opened (Fig. 1b) and the final inflorescence and peduncle length as well as the final number of capitula per inflorescence (Tab. 1; Fig. 1c, d) was reached during the pre-flowering phase (weeks 8-10). The capitulum buds started emitting odor during the last week of this developmental phase. The following flowering phase (11th week) comprised the day before the one night of flowering as well as the following days until all unfertilized flowers were aborted (Fig. 1e-g). Due to the open flowers, the capitulum diameter increased significantly (Tab. 1). Opening started around noon of the day before the single flowering night of every capitulum (i.e., ca. 30 h before start of the nectar production) when the subtending bracts of the nectarsecreting flowers lifted slightly and the styles elongated, wherefore the capitula looked somehow linty (Fig. 1e). The fertile flowers opened 24 h later, i.e., around noon before the flowering night. The well-exserted bright red colored anthers and the apical part of the filaments caused the red color of the capitula. The time of anther opening corresponded always with the starting of the nectar production around dusk. After anther opening, the red color became a yellowish tone due to the openly presented yellow-colored polyads. Additionally, large nectar drops accumulated at the styles of the nectarsecreting flowers soon after dusk (Fig 1f). The pale styles of the fertile flowers elongated between 20:00 h and 21:00 h and exceeded the anthers. The anthers were getting darker with proceeding time. Therefore, the color and brightness of the capitula changed from bright red via red with a yellowish tone to dark purple-red during the one night of anthesis.

Most flowers were aborted during the next three to four days; only 50 to 100 flowers remained at the olive-green receptacle (Fig. 1g). A small fraction of these flowers developed into small, olive-green pods (reduction phase, weeks 12 and 13; Fig. 1h), and just every seventh of these latter proceeded its development (Tab. 1). These pods grew strongly during the following 14th week (growth phase; Fig. 1i). The color of the pods changed to reddish-brown (Tab. 1) during the growth phase and turned into deep green thereafter (unripe phase). The fruits reached their final length and final number per capitulum in the unripe phase (weeks 15-17; Tab. 1). After these three weeks, they entered the gum-producing phase, during which they produced a very sticky exudate, especially at the thickened ventral sutures (Fig. 1j). This gum-producing phase lasted two weeks (weeks 18 and 19) before gum production stopped and the pods began to dry out. The pre-dispersal phase lasted for two weeks (weeks 20 and 21). The pods were dry and dark and the gum was still attached. The following dispersal phase lasted for several weeks, depending on the strength of precipitation since heavy rainfall washes off the water-soluble gum. Although the pods were open, a huge number of seeds remained on the pods glued to the very sticky exudate (Fig. 1k) or was still being connected with the pod by their funicles. The pods often remained for several months still attached on the tree after releasing all the seeds (post-dispersal phase).

 

Discussion

The described phases in the development of flowers and buds of Parkia pendula were very distinct and were clearly distinguishable with binoculars. Together with the observed temporal pattern, they are therefore good predictors of flowering and fruiting of P. pendula. Furthermore, observations on Parkia platycephala Benth. (D. Piechowski, unpubl. data) suggest that these phases and their temporal pattern may also hold true for the development of other Parkia species, at least for the section Platyparkia. The short flowering period of individual trees (Piechowski 2007b) as well as the fruiting time may therefore be estimated long in advance.

Additionally, the data clearly showed a three times repeated temporally correlated pattern of an enormous abortion of reproductive organs followed by a very fast development of the remaining ones. These highly synchronized events occurred on three morphological levels: the inflorescence-level, the capitulum-level, and the pod-level. The reduction on capitulum-level is also described by Hopkins (1986) but she did not observe the high synchronization within the whole reproduction process: capitulum buds were aborted only in the short time between the growth of the primary axes and peduncle elongation and not during all bud phases. This kind of highly synchronized abortion during the early developmental stages of reproductive organs is well documented for the fruit abscission in several species (Stephenson 1981). Reallocation of limited resources is generally suspected to be the proximate reason for these abortions since resources are usually translocated out of the aborted organ before abscission and the remaining fruits benefit from these 'surplus resources' (Stephenson 1981). A possible ultimate reason for the overproduction and later abscission might be predator satiation (Janzen 1971), which for Parkia was already hypothesized earlier by Hopkins & Hopkins (1983) to be a defense strategy against the high seed-beetle diversity at Parkia in the Amazon basin (Hopkins 1983). Besides invertebrates, the Brazilian porcupine (Coendou prehensilis L.) was identified as a common herbivore of P. pendula buds (Piechowski 2007b).

 

Acknowledgements

Contribution of the project "Sustainability of remnants of the Atlantic rainforest in Pernambuco and its implications for conservation and local development", a Brazilian-German scientific cooperation within the program "Science and Technology for the Atlantic Rainforest" funded by CNPq (590039/2006-7) and BMBF (01 LB 0203 A1). The Usina São José S.A. / Grupo Cavalcanti Petribú kindly allowed access to their properties and supported fieldwork logistically. We are grateful to Johannes Piechowski for drawing the illustrations, to Paula Koeler Lira for her kind help with the resumo, to Simone Goda Sporn for providing us with literature on fruit abortion, and two anonymous reviewers for valuable comments on the manuscript.

 

References

Anderson, D.M.W. & Pinto, G.L. 1985. Gum polysaccharides from three Parkia species. Phytochemistry 24(1): 77-79.         [ Links ]

Barker, M. 1997. An update on low-tech methods for forest canopy access and on sampling a forest canopy. Selbyana 18(1): 61-71.         [ Links ]

Carvalho, C.T. 1961. Sobre os habitos alimentares de Phillostomídeos (Mammalia, Chiroptera). Revista de Biología Tropical 9(1): 53-60.         [ Links ]

Companhia Pernambucana do Meio Ambiente (CPRH). 2003. Diagnóstico Socioambiental do Litoral Norte de Pernambuco. Recife. CPRH.         [ Links ]

Dominguez, J.M.L.; Bittencourt, A.C.S.P.; Leão, Z.M.A.N. & Azevedo, A.E.G. 1990. Geologia quaternária costeiro do estado de Pernambuco. Revista Brasileira de Geociências 20(2): 208-215.         [ Links ]

Ferraz, E.M.N.; Araújo, E.L. & Silva, S.I. 2004. Floristic similarities between lowland and montane areas of Atlantic coastal forest in northeastern Brazil. Plant Ecology 174(1): 59-70.         [ Links ]

Fischer, E.A. 2000. Polinização por morcegos Glossophaginae versus Phyllostominae em floresta de terra firme na Amazônia central. Doctoral Thesis. Universidade Estadual de Campinas.         [ Links ]

Guedes, M.L.S. 1998. A vegetacão fanerogâmica da Reserva Ecológica de Dois Irmãos. Pp. 157-172. In: I. C. Machado; A. V. Lopes & K. C. Porto (eds.). Reserva Ecológica de Dois Irmãos: Estudos emum Remanescente de Mata Atlântica em Área Urbana (Recife - Pernambuco - Brasil). Recife, Editora Universitária da UFPE.         [ Links ]

Hopkins, H.C.F. & Hopkins, M.J.G. 1983. Fruit and seed biology of the Neotropical species of Parkia. Pp. 197-209. In: S. L. Sutton; T. C. Whitmore & A. C. Chadwick (eds.). Tropical Rain Forest: Ecology and Management. Oxford, London, Edinburgh, Blackwell.         [ Links ]

Hopkins, H.C.F. 1984. Floral biology and pollination ecology of the Neotropical species of Parkia. Journal of Ecology 72(1): 1-23.         [ Links ]

Hopkins, H.C.F. 1986. Parkia (Leguminosae: Mimosoideae). Flora Neotropica 43. New York. New York Botanical Garden.         [ Links ]

Hopkins, M.J.G. 1983. Unusual diversities of seed beetles (Coleoptera: Bruchidae) on Parkia (Leguminosae: Mimosoideae) in Brazil. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 19(4): 329-338.         [ Links ]

Janzen, D.H. 1971. Seed predation by animals. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 2(1): 465-492.         [ Links ]

Kornerup, A. & Wanscher, J.H. 1981. Taschenlexikon der Farben - 1440 Farbnuancen und 600 Farbnamen. Zürich, Göttingen. Muster-Schmidt.         [ Links ]

Oliveira, M.C.P.; Ferraz, I.D.K. & Oliveira, G.J. 2006. Dispersão e superação da dormência de sementes de Parkia pendula (Willd.) Walp. (visgueiro) na Amazônia Central, AM, Brasil. Hoehnea 33(4): 485-493.         [ Links ]

Peres, C.A. 2000. Identifying keystone plant resources in tropical forests: the case of gum from Parkia pods. Journal of Tropical Ecology 16(2): 287-317.         [ Links ]

Piechowski, D. 2007a. Bat visits and changes in floral nectar during anthesis of Parkia pendula (Mimosaceae). Phyton (Horn, Austria) 46(2): 203-204.         [ Links ]

Piechowski, D. 2007b. Reproductive ecology, seedling performance, and population structure of Parkia pendula in an Atlantic Forest fragment in northeastern Brazil. Doctoral Thesis. Ulm University.         [ Links ]

Piechowski, D.; Dötterl, S. & Gottsberger, G. in press. Pollination biology and floral scent chemistry of the Neotropical chiropterophilous Parkia pendula. Plant Biology.         [ Links ]

Piechowski, D. & Gottsberger, G. 2008. Edge effects on germination, seedling establishment, and population structure of Parkia pendula in an Atlantic Forest fragment, NE Brazil. Bioremediation, Biodiversity and Bioavailability 2(1): 56-61.         [ Links ]

Rodriguez-H., B. & Hopkins, M.J.G. 2000. Ametrida centurio visiting flowers of Parkia pendula (Mimosaceae) in Brazil. Bat Research News 41(3): 70-71.         [ Links ]

Schessl, M.; Silva, W.L. & Gottsberger, G. 2008. Effects of fragmentation on forest structure and litter dynamics in Atlantic rainforest in Pernambuco, Brazil. Flora 203(3): 215-228.         [ Links ]

Silva, H.C.H.; Lins-e-Silva, A.C.B.; Gomes, J.S. & Rodal, M.J.N. 2008. The effect of internal and external edges on vegetation physiognomy and structure in a remnant of Atlantic lowland rainforest in Brazil. Bioremediation, Biodiversity and Bioavailability 2(1): 47-55.         [ Links ]

Siqueira, D.R.; Rodal, M.J.N.; Lins-e-Silva, A.C.B. & Melo, A.L. 2001. Physiognomy, structure, and floristics in an area of Atlantic Forest in Northeast Brazil. Pp. 11-27. In: G. Gottsberger & S. Liede (eds.). Life Forms and Dynamics in Tropical Forests. Berlin, Stuttgart, J. Cramer Gebr. Borntraeger Verlagsbuchhandlung.         [ Links ]

Stephenson, A.G. 1981. Flower and fruit abortion: proximate causes and ultimate functions. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 12(1): 253-279.         [ Links ]

 

 

Received: October 29, 2008
Accepted: April 28, 2009

 

 

1 Corresponding author: danielpiechowski@web.de

Creative Commons License All the contents of this journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License