SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.29 issue1Plant growth analysis and seed vigor expression: effects of soil waterlogging during rye plant developmentDiversity of bryophytes in priority areas for conservation in the Atlantic forest of northeast Brazil author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

Share


Acta Botanica Brasilica

Print version ISSN 0102-3306

Acta Bot. Bras. vol.29 no.1 Belo Horizonte Jan./Mar. 2015

http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0102-33062014abb3609 

Articles

Embryology of Ageratum conyzoides L. and A. fastigiatum R.M. King & H. Rob. (Asteraceae)

Rafael de Oliveira Franca 1  

Orlando Cavalari De-Paula 1  

Renata Carmo-Oliveira 1  

Juliana Marzinek 1   2  

1Instituto de Biologia, Universidade Federal de Uberlândia, Uberlândia, Minas Gerais, Brasil

ABSTRACT

Ageratum has a complex circumscription, and recent studies have indicated its polyphyletism. The genus has been placed in the tribe Eupatorieae whose embryology is not fully known. Embryological data are conservative and important indicators of phylogenetic relationships and can improve family relationships. This study presents, for the first time in Eupatorieae, embryological data for Ageratum conyzoides and A. fastigiatum. Both species have common features of the family such as a unitegmic anatropous ovule, basal placentation, secretory tapetum, Polygonum megagametophyte, and Asterad embryogenesis. The data obtained reinforce the heterogeneity of the family embryology and show, for the first time, the anther wall development of the monocotyledonous type for Asteraceae. The species studied show also differences between themselves. A. conyzoides has bisporangiated and introrse anthers, conspicuous pappus, and cypselae with trichomes on the ribs, whereas A. fastigiatum has tetrasporangiate and latrorse anthers, pappus absent at maturity, and glabrous cypselae. The data presented support recent phylogenetic molecular studies, suggesting the replacement of A. fastigiatum to another genus along with Gyptidinae.

Key words: Compositae; embryogenesis; Eupatorieae; ontogeny; phytomelanin

Introduction

Ageratum comprises approximately 29 species (King & Robinson 1987) in the Americas and adjacent West Indies, and A. conyzoides is a pantropical introduced weed (Johnson 1971). The species name is derived from the Greek a (=not) and geras (=old age) due to the longevity of their flowers (Johnson 1971therein). The genus is characterized can be recognized by a conical receptacle, leaves with large glandular punctuations, large anther appendages, and cypselae with distinct and contorted carpopodia (King & Robinson 1987). Ageratum is the best known genus in the tribe Eupatorieae (King & Robinson 1987), and its members have been cultivated in Europe since the seventeenth century as an ornamental species, while some species are used in traditional medicine to treat a variety of diseases (Johnson 1971 therein).

The delimitation of the genus Ageratum is complex and it has been discussed since the seventeenth century, mainly based on pappus morphology. In the current circumscription, this genus comprises species with pappus that have a distinct five-dome or cup format and connate scales (Johnson 1971). Hattori (2013), studying the phylogeny of several subtribes inside Eupatorieae, observed Ageratum in two separate terminals, suggesting a new combination of A. fastigiatum to another genus.

The embryology of Asteraceae is heterogeneous and does not show a fixed structural pattern that separates the family from other angiosperms (Johri et al. 1992). Embryology in Eupatorieae is focused only on the fruit, seed (Pandey & Singh 1983; Marzinek & Oliveira 2010; Marzinek et al. 2010), and female gametophyte development (Holmgren 1919; Bertasso-Borges & Coleman 2005).

Embryological data are constant for genera, making may be useful in determining taxonomic relationships within families, genera, or species (Palser 1975; Stuessy 2009). Thus, this study aims to investigate the embryology of A. conyzoides and A. fastigiatum, thereby testing the phylogenetic hypothesis of Hattori (2013) with an ontogenetic approach.

Materials and methods

Flower buds, flowers, and fruits in various stages of development from Ageratum conyzoides (Gardner) R.M. King & H. Rob. and Ageratum fastigiatum L. were collected in Uberlândia, Minas Gerais, Brazil (19º10'942"S, 48º23'61"W and 19º11'026"S, 48°23'804"W). The voucher was incorporated into the Herbarium Uberlandense (HUFU) under accession numbers 20,142 for A. conyzoides and 57,943 for A. fastigiatum.

Samples were fixed in FAA50 (Johansen 1940), stored in 50% alcohol (Berlyn & Miksche 1976), and embedded in methyl methacrylate-based. The material was 2-8µm thick on a rotary microtome. Sections were stained with toluidine blue at pH 4.7 with acetate buffer (O'Brien et al. 1964modified), and mounted with synthetic mounting media. The slides produced were analysed and documented on Olympus BX51 light microscope.

The results were described following Marzinek & Oliveira (2010), while embryo development description was based on Johri et al. (1992).

Results

Microsporangium

In the early stages, the anther is formed by homogeneous meristematic cells surrounded by the protoderm (Fig. 1A). The cells of the primary parietal layer has hypodermic origin. They divide periclinally resulting in two secondary parietal layers. The outer secondary parietal layer differentiates directly into the endothecium. The cells of the inner secondary parietal layer undergo periclinal divisions forming the middle layer (externally) and tapetum (internally) (Fig. 1B).

Figure 1. Transversal (A-C, F-H) and longitudinal sections (D-E, I, J) of the floral buds and flowers at anthesis of Ageratum. A Young anther of A. fastigiatum, showing the divisions of the primary parietal layer. B Anther of A. conyzoides, note two abaxial sporangia and two remnants of adaxial sporangia. C Detail of the anther wall of A. fastigiatum with persistent epidermis and radial thickening of the endothecium. D-E Simultaneous cytokinesis and tetrahedral tetrad of the microspores of A. fastigiatum. F Anther of the A. fastigiatum under polarized light showing styloid crystals. G General view of the anther of A. fastigiatum showing lateral anther dehiscence. H General aspect of the anther of A. conyzoides showing introrse dehiscence. I-J Detail of the pollen grains of A. fastigiatum with the vegetative cell and two elongated gametes. an anther, arrow: periclinal division of the primary parietal layer, arrowhead stomium, mm microspore mother cell, cr styloid crystal, dy dyad, en endothecium, ep epidermis, ga gamete, ip inner secondary parietal layer, ml middle layer, op outer secondary parietal layer, pe petal, st stigma, ta tapetum, te tetrad of microspores vc vegetative cell 

The protoderm differentiates in the epidermis persisting at maturity and its cells are periclinally elongated. Endothecium cells are also elongated and radially thickened (Fig. 1C). The middle layer is ephemeral. The tapetum has cells with dense cytoplasm and many fused nuclei (Fig. 1D). During development, the tapetum is projected toward the anther locule involving the microspores (Fig. 1D-F). Styloid crystals are observed in all layers of the developing anther (Fig. 1F). At the stage of pollen dispersal, only the epidermis and endothecium remain. Anther dehiscence of A. fastigiatum is latrorse (Fig. 1G) and is introrse in A. conyzoides (Fig. 1H).

Ageratum conyzoides has two functional abaxial sporangia, whereas the adaxial sporangia are rarely presented (Fig. 1B) and A. fastigiatum has four functional sporangia (Fig. 1F).

Microsporocytes undergo simultaneous meiosis generating tetrahedral tetrads (Fig. 1D-E) and each microspore produces a tricellular pollen grain with elongated gametes (Fig. 1I) and evident exine (Fig. 1J).

Ovary

The ovary is inferior bicarpelar, syncarpous, and unilocular (Fig. 2A-B). The outer epidermis is uniseriated with trichomes on the ribs only in A. conyzoides (Fig. 2C-D).

Figure 2. Transversal (B-E, I) and longitudinal sections (A, F-H, J-N) of the floral buds and flowers at anthesis of Ageratum. A-B Overview of the flower bud of A. fastigiatum. C Glabrous ribs of A. fastigiatum. D Ribs with trichomes of A. conyzoides. E-F Ovary of A. fastigiatum. G Detail of the asymmetric carpopodium of A. fastigiatum. H Detail of the asymmetric carpopodium of A. conyzoides. I-J Ovule of A. fastigiatum with differentiated endothelium. K Ovule, note early development of the megaspore mother cell below the nucellar epidermis of A. fastigiatum. L Ovule showing the linear tetrad of megaspores of A. fastigiatum. M Detail of the ovule of A. fastigiatum, note chalazal functional megaspore and three microspores degenerating. N Megagametophyte of A. fastigiatum. an antipodes, arrowhead nucellus, ca carpopodium, dm degenerated megaspore, en endothelium, ep epidermis, fd floral disk, fm functional megaspore, ie inner epidermis, im inner mesophyll, mc middle cell, me megaspore, mm megaspore mother cell, ne nectary, nu nucellus, oe outer epidermis, om outer mesophyll, oo egg cell, ov ovule, ow ovary wall, pe petal, rb rapheal bundle, ri rib, st style, sy synergids, tr trichome 

The mesophyll has two regions (Fig. 2E-F). The outer two layers of mesophyll have bulky (Fig. 2E), slightly longitudinally elongated cells (Fig. 2F). The internal mesophyll has four to six layers of varying diameters (Fig. 2E) and longitudinally elongated cells (Fig. 2F). Five procambial bundles accompany the ribs (Fig. 2B-D). The inner epidermis is uniseriate (Fig. 2E-F). At the base of the ovary, there is a protuberance with parenchyma cells that have various shapes constituting the carpopodium. In both species, the carpopodium is asymmetric (Fig. 2A, G, H).

Ovule

The ovule is anatropous, unitegmic, and tenuinucellate with basal placentation (Fig. 2A). The outer integument epidermis is uniseriate with cuboidal, juxtaposed cells and an evident nucleus. The mesophyll comprises approximately nine layers of cells (Fig. 2I-J). A procambial bundle crosses through the raphe and extends to the middle portion of the anti-raphe. The inner epidermis has one to two layers of cells with dense cytoplasm, large nuclei, and distinct nucleoli constituting the endothelium (Fig. 2J).

The nucellus has only one archesporial cell differentiating directly into the megaspore mother cell, just below the epidermis (Fig. 2K). The megaspore mother cell undergoes meiosis, giving rise to a linear tetrad of megaspores (Fig. 2L), and only the chalazal megaspore remains functional (Fig. 2M). The embryo sac is monosporic and 7-celled or a Polygonumtype megagametophyte. The nucellus remnants occur around the embryo sac (Fig. 2N).

Fertilization, embryo, and endosperm

Fertilization is micropylar with pollen tube entering into the one synergid (Fig. 3A). The egg cell and one of the gametes join to form the zygote (Fig. 3B). The other gamete merges with the fused nuclei of the middle cell forming the first cell of the endosperm (Fig. 3A). The first cell of the endosperm divides forming walls between the nuclei (Fig. 3B-D). The zygote undergoes a transverse division generating basal and apical cells (Fig. 3C). Basal cell undergo transverse division and each gives rise to two daughter cells (ciand m) (Fig. 3D). The ci cell is transversely divided into n and n' and divides again giving rise to n, an o, and p cells, resulting in the suspensor (Fig. 3E-H). The m cell undergoes two longitudinal divisions giving rise to the quadrant m that will in turn give rise to the hypocotyl and radicle (Fig. 3D-G). The apical cell undergoes three longitudinal divisions forming the octant q, responsible for formation of cotyledons, epicotyl, and plumule (Fig. 3D-G). After successive divisions the embryo has a globular shape (Fig. 3H). The mature embryo is axial and occupies the whole seminal chamber (Fig. 3I). The embryo axis is straight, and the plumule is poorly differentiated.

Figure 3. Longitudinal sections of the seeds of Ageratum fastigiatum (A-D, F-I) and A. conyzoides (E). A-H Immature seeds. A Fertilization of egg cell and middle cell, noted synergid increased density of the cytoplasm and polar nuclei of middle cell fused (arrow). B Early zygote and first cell of the endosperm. C Proembryo resulting from the transversal division of the zygote resulting in an apical cell (ca) and basal cell (cb). D Embryo with four cells, noted q cells originated from a longitudinal division of the apical cell (ca), m and ci resulting from a transverse division of the basal cell (cb). E-F Embryo with 8 cells showing two cells q, two m cells, n and n' derived from a transverse division of ci. G Embryo with 16 cells, which 8 q cells, 4 m, 2 n, o and p result of transversal division of n' cell. H Globular embryo with suspensor. I Mature seed showing embryo with embryo axis straight and two convex planes cotyledons. co cotyledon, ea embryo axis, er endosperm, ga gamete, mc middle cell, oo egg cell, pl plumule, su suspensor, sy synergid, zy zygote 

Fruit and seed

During fruit development, the outer epidermis develops the exocarp, the mesophyll develops in mesocarp, and endocarp originates from the inner epidermis of the ovary.

The exocarp remains unchanged. The outer mesocarp exhibits increased cells with large vacuoles. Between the outer and inner mesocarp, there is a partial separation of the cells forming a space schizogenous with projections of inner mesocarp connecting the two layers. The schizogenous space is filled by the secretion of phytomelanin. The inner mesocarp is formed of only one fibre layer, while the other layers were crushed by the seed growth (Fig. 4A-E).

Figure 4. Transversal (A, C-D) and longitudinal sections (B, E-I) of the floral buds, flowers, and fruits of Ageratum. A-B Immature fruit of Ageratum showing the early formation of schizogenous space. A A. fastigiatum. B A. conyzoides. C-E Immature fruit of Ageratum, note schizogenous space filled by phytomelanin. C A. conyzoides. D-E A. fastigiatum. F-G Carpopodium of Ageratum. F A. fastigiatum. G A. conyzoides. H-I Floral disk of Ageratum. H A. fastigiatum, note persistent pappus. I A. conyzoides. arrow crashed layer (part of the inner mesocarp, endocarp, and integument), arrowhead phytomelanin, asterisk fibre layer, em embryo, er endosperm, ex exocarp, fd floral disk, im inner mesocarp, in integument, om outer mesocarp, pa pappus 

At maturity, both the carpopodium (Fig. 4F-G) and the floral disk (Fig. 4H-I) show lignification. The pappus is lacking in A. fastigiatum and persistent in A. conyzoides (Fig. 4H-I). The exotesta shows no modifications. The internal mesotesta and endotesta are crushed (Fig. 4C-E). The endosperm cells are persistent, with one to three cell layers surrounding the embryo (Fig. 4E).

Discussion

In A. fastigiatum and A. conyzoides, the outer secondary parietal layer originates directly into the endothecium and the inner develops a middle layer and tapetum. This pattern of anther wall development is the monocotyledonous type and is the first record for Asteraceae. In the family, the pattern described until now has been dicotyledonous (Davis 1966; Johri et al. 1992; Gotelli et al. 2008; Liu et al. 2011).

Both species of Ageratum present an endothecium with radial thickening. In Eupatorieae, the same type of thickening was observed as in Eupatorium cannabinum (Dormer 1962). The presence of crystals in the tapetum, as found in the studied species, is poorly explored in embryological studies of the Asteraceae family and has been previously reported only in Helianthus (Meric & Dane 2004). The presence of crystals does not necessarily represent patterns in different taxonomic levels (Buss Jr & Lersten 1972; Prychid & Rudall 1999; De-Paula & Sajo 2011).

According to Davis (1966), tetrasporangiate anthers are common in the family. A. fastigiatum presented tetrasporangiated anthers, and A. conyzoides presented bisporangiated anthers. The position of the anther opening also differs between the two species. In A. fastigiatum, the anther is latrorse but is introrse in A. conyzoides.

The tapetum cells of both Ageratum species protrude toward the anther locule and possess fused nuclei. Multinucleated amoeboidal tapetum is the most common type in Compositae (Johri et al. 1992); it has also been observed in Carduoideae (Yeung et al. 2011), Senecioneae (Pullaiah 1983; Lakshmi & Pullaiah 1987), Gnaphalieae (Davis 1962a; Pullaiah 1979), Astereae (Davis 1968), Anthemideae (Davis 1962b; Li et al. 2010), Inuleae (Pullaiah 1979), and Heliantheae (Gotelli et al. 2008). Secretory tapetum occurs in Pertyeae (Kapil & Sethi 1962), Cichorieae (Sood et al. 2000; Yurukova-Grancharova et al. 2006), and Vernonieae (Tiagi & Tamni 1963).

Simultaneous cytokinesis was recorded for both species of Ageratum and according to Davis (1966), is considered the main type of cytokinesis in the family.

As previously described for the family, both species have an anatropous and unitegmic ovule with basal placentation (Davis 1966; Johri et al. 1992).

Ageratum conyzoides and A. fastigiatum present the monosporic Polygonummegagametophyte type, which has been observed in Eupatorium (Holmgren 1919; Bertasso-Borges & Coleman 2005) and for most Asteraceae species (Davis 1962a; Johri et al. 1992). The bisporic Allium type was found in Gnaphalieae, Anthemideae, Astereae, and Heliantheae: the Adoxa type in Heliantheae, the Drusa type in Gnaphalieae, Anthemideae, and Astereae, and the Fritillaria type in Heliantheae (Davis 1966).

The cellular endosperm was observed in the species studied and is consistent with findings for the tribe (Pandey & Singh 1983; Marzinek & Oliveira 2010), it has also been found in Senecioneae (Pullaiah 1983; Lakshmi & Pullaiah 1987), Gnaphalieae (Davis 1961; 1962a), Anthemideae (Davis 1962b), Inuleae (Pullaiah 1979), and Tageteae (Misra 1964). Nuclear endosperm was found in Mutisieae (Devi 1957), Cichorieae (Yurukova-Grancharova et al. 2006), and Vernonieae (Sharma & Murty 1978). The Astereae tribe presents both types of endosperm development: nuclear in Erigeron bonariensis and cellular in Felicia bergeriana (Sharma & Murty 1978) and Brachycome ciliares (Davis 1964).

The embryogenesis of both species is the Asterad type, in which basal and apical cells participate in the formation of the embryo as previously described for Compositae (Davis 1966; Johri et al. 1992).

The pericarp of A. conyzoides and A. fastigiatum follows the pattern of the development observed in Eupatorieae, with the outer mesocarp presenting cells and large vacuoles and a phytomelanin layer and fibres (Marzinek & Oliveira 2010; De-Paula et al. 2013). Phytomelanin was observed in some tribes of Asteraceae such as Carduoideae (Pandey & Singh 1982), Vernonieae (Basak & Mukherjee 2003; Loeuille et al. 2013), Gnaphalieae (Davis 1962a), Anthemideae (Aguado et al. 2011), Heliantheae (Maheshwari & Srinivasan 1944), and Eupatorieae (Pandey & Singh 1983; Marzinek & Oliveira 2010). According to De-Paula et al. (2013), the fibres of the pericarp are directly responsible for secreting phytomelanin in Praxelis diffusa; this fact will probably also be true in Ageratum, where phytomelanin is observed primarily near the fibres.

In both species studied, vascular bundles correspond to the salient region of fruit called ribs in Eupatorieae, and both species are able to have bundles without ribs. Reinforcing the taxonomic importance for this feature, the ribs of A. conyzoides possess trichomes, and A. fastigiatum has glabrous ribs. Another important feature is the pappus, present in A. conyzoides and lacking at maturity in A. fastigiatum. The presence or absence of the papus shows an important feature for a new circumscription of the genus.

Carpopodium promotes fruit abscission at the dispersion. Haque & Godward (1984) associated the asymmetry of carpopodium with presence of the pappus, but this was not observed in this study in which A. fastigiatum features a symmetrical carpopodium and the pappus is absent; A. conyzoides has a weakly asymmetric carpopodium and persistent pappus.

The results of this study confirm the heterogeneity of embryological processes in the Asteraceae family. Common features to the family, but not exclusive, have been observed as the unitegmic anatropous ovule, basal placentation, secretory tapetum, Polygonum megagametophyte type, and embryogenesis of the Asterad type. Other features expressed the homogeneity of embryological data within the tribes, such as the radial thickening of the endothecium and development of the pericarp typical for Eupatorieae. The monocotyledonous anther development type reported for the Ageratum species studied here, and not yet described for Asteraceae, is emerging as an important feature for the tribe. Because this was the first study to describe this type of development for the family, more studies are needed to assess the true potential of this feature for Eupatorieae. Both species showed distinguishing features: A. fastigiatum with a tetrasporangiate and latrorse anther and A. conyzoides with a bisporangiate and introrse anther. In addition to the anther, the presence of the pappus and trichomes in the ribs can separate A. conyzoides from A. fastigiatum, corroborating the phylogenetic hypothesis of Hattori (2013) that suggests that Ageratum should be segregated into two distinct clades: one with A. conyzoides, which is widely distributed in the Americas, and one with A. fastigiatum, which, along with Gyptidinae, is exclusively distributed in Brazil.

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Jimi N. Nakajima and Eric K. O. Hattori for identifying the plants, FAPEMIG (process no. APQ 02127-09) for financial support, and two anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments.

REFERENCES

Aguado M, Martínez-Sánchez JJ, Reig-Armiñana J, et al. 2011. Morphology, anatomy and germination response of heteromorphic achenes of Anthemis chrysantha J. Gay (Asteraceae), a critically endangered species. Seed Science Research 21: 283-294. [ Links ]

Basak N, Mukherjee SK. 2003. Taxonomic significance of cypselar features in some species of Vernonia. Journal of Hill Research 16: 9-15. [ Links ]

Berlyn GP, Miksche JP. 1976. Botanical microtechnique and cytochemistry. Iowa, Iowa State University Press, Ames. [ Links ]

Bertasso-Borges MS, Coleman JR. 2005. Cytogenetics and embryology of Eupatorium laevigatum (Compositae). Genetics and Molecular Biology 28: 123-128. [ Links ]

Buss PAJ, Lersten NR. 1972. Crystals in tapetal cells of the Leguminosae. Botanical Journal of Linnean Society 65: 81-85. [ Links ]

Davis GL. 1961. The life history of Podolepis jaceoides (Sims) Voss - II. Megasporogenesis, female gametophyte and embryogeny. Phytomorphology 11: 206-219. [ Links ]

Davis GL. 1962a. Embryological studies in the Compositae: II. Sporogenesis, gametogenesis and embriogeny in Ammobium alatum. Australian Journal of Botany 10: 65-76. [ Links ]

Davis GL. 1962b. Embryological studies in the Compositae. I. Sporogenesis, gametogenesis, and embryogeny in Cotula australis (Lees.) Hook. F. Australian Journal of Botany 10: 1-12. [ Links ]

Davis GL. 1964. Embryological studies in the Compositae. IV. Sporogenesis, gametogenesis, and embryogeny in Brachycome ciliaris (Labill.) Less. Australian Journal of Botany 12: 142-151. [ Links ]

Davis GL. 1966. Systematic Embryology of the Angiosperms. New York, John Wiley Sons. [ Links ]

Davis GL. 1968. Apomixis and abnormal anther development in Calotis lappulaceae Benth. Australian Journal of Botany 16: 1-17. [ Links ]

De-Paula OC, Sajo MG. 2011. Morphology and development of anthers and ovules in Croton and Astraea (Euphorbiaceae). Nordic Journal of Botany 29: 505-511. [ Links ]

De-Paula OC, Marzinek J, Oliveira DMT, Machado SRM. 2013. The role od fibers and the hypodermis in Compositae melanin secretion. Micron 44: 312-316. [ Links ]

Devi MH. 1957. Embryological studies in Compositae III: Gerbera jamesonii Bolus. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 46: 69-74. [ Links ]

Dormer KJ. 1962. The fibrous layers in the anthers of the Compositae. New Phytologist 61: 150-163. [ Links ]

Gotelli M, Galati B, Medan D. 2008. Embryology of Helianthus annus (Asteraceae). Annales Botanici Fennici 45: 81-96. [ Links ]

Haque MZ, Godward MBE. 1984. New records of the carpopodium in Compositae and its taxonomic use. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 89: 321-340. [ Links ]

Hattori EKO. 2013. Filogenia Molecular da subtribo Disynaphiinae (Eupatorieae: Asteraceae), tratamento taxonômico e sinopse de Symphyopappus e anatomia floral do clado Grazielia/Symphyopappus. PhD Thesis, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Brazil. [ Links ]

Holmgren I. 1919. Zytologische studien über die Fortpflanzing bei den gattungen Erigeron und Eupatorium. Kongl Svenska Vetenskapsakad Handl 59: 1-118. [ Links ]

Johansen DA. 1940. Plant microtechnique. New York, McGraw-Hill Book Company Inc. [ Links ]

Johnson MF. 1971. A monograph of the genus Ageratum L. (Compositae-Eupatorieae) . Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 58: 6-88. [ Links ]

Johri BMK, Ambegaokar B, Srivastava PS. 1992. Comparative embryology of angiosperms, vol 2. Berlin, Springer-Verlag. [ Links ]

Kapil RN, Sethi B. 1962 Gametogenesis and seed development in Ainsliaea aptera DC. Phytomorphology 12: 222-234. [ Links ]

King RM, Robinson H. 1987. The genera of the Eupatorieae (Asteraceae). Kansas, Missouri Botanical Garden. [ Links ]

Lakshmi PS, Pullaiah T. 1987. Embryology of Senecio tenuifolius Burm. F. (Asteraceae). Taiwania 32: 208-213. [ Links ]

Li F, Chen S, Chen F, et al. 2010. Anther wall development, microsporogenesis and microgametogenesis in male fertile and sterile chrysanthemum (Chrysanthemum morifolium Ramat., Asteraceae). Scientia Horticulturae 126: 261-267. [ Links ]

Liu JX, Wang M, Chen BX, Jin P, Li JY, Zeng K. 2011. Microsporogenesis, microgametogenesis, and pollen morphology of Ambrosia artemisiifolia L. in China. Plant Systematic and Evolution 298: 1-8. [ Links ]

Loeuille B, Nakajima JN, Oliveira DMT, Semir J, Pirani JR. 2013. Two new species of Heterocoma (Asteraceae: Vernonieae) and a broadened concept of the genus. Systematic Botany 38: 242-252. [ Links ]

Maheshwari P, Srinivasan R. 1944. A contribution to the embryology of Rudbeckia bicolor Nutt. New Phytologist 43: 135-142. [ Links ]

Marzinek J, De-Paula OC, Oliveira DMT. 2010. The ribs of Eupatorieae (Asteraceae): of wide taxonomic value or reliable characters only among certain groups? Plant Systematics and Evolution 285: 127-130. [ Links ]

Marzinek J, Oliveira DMT. 2010. Structure and ontogeny of the pericarp of six Eupatorieae (Asteraceae) with ecological and taxonomic considerations. Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências 82: 279-291. [ Links ]

Meric C, Dane F. 2004. Calcium oxalate crystals in floral organs of Helianthus annuus L. and H. tuberosus L. (Asteraceae). Acta Biologica Szegediensis 48: 19-23. [ Links ]

Misra S. 1964. Floral morphology of the family Compositae. 2. Development of the seed and fruit in Flaveria repanda. Botanical Magazin Tokyo 77: 290-296. [ Links ]

O'Brien TP, Feder N, McCully ME. 1964 Polychromatic staining of plant cell walls by toluidine blue O. Protoplasma 59: 368-373. [ Links ]

Palser B. 1975. The bases of angiosperm phylogeny: embryology. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 62: 621-646. [ Links ]

Pandey AK, Singh RP. 1982. Development and structure of seeds and fruits in the Compositae, tribe Senecioneae. Botanische Jahrbucher fur Systematik, Pflanzengeschichte und Pflanzengeographie 103: 413-422. [ Links ]

Pandey AK, Singh RP. 1983. Development and structure of seeds and fruits in Compositae: tribe Eupatorieae. Journal of the Indian Botanical Society 62: 276-281. [ Links ]

Prychid CJ, Rudall PJ. 1999. Calcium oxalate crystals in Monocotyledons: a revision their structure and systematics. Annals of Botany 84: 725-739. [ Links ]

Pullaiah T. 1979. Studies in the embryology of Compositae. IV. The tribe Inuleae. American Journal of Botany 66: 1119-1127. [ Links ]

Pullaiah T. 1983. Studies in the embryology of Senecioneae (Compositae). Plant Systematics and Evolution 142: 61-70. [ Links ]

Sharma HP, Murtym YSM. 1978. Embryological studies in the Compositae Astereae-II. Proceedings of the Indian Academy of Sciences Plant Sciences B 87: 149-156. [ Links ]

Sood SK, Sood P, Kumar N. 2000. Investigations on embryology and developmental anatomy of achenes in Lactuca dissecta D. Don (Asteraceae). Phytomorphology 50: 59-68. [ Links ]

Stuessy TF. 2009. Plant taxonomy: the systematic evaluation of comparative data. New York, Columbia University Press. [ Links ]

Tiagi B, Tamni S. 1963. Floral morphology and embryology of Vernonia cinerascens and V. cinerea. Agra University Journal of Research 12: 123-135. [ Links ]

Yeung EC, Oinam GS, Yeung SS, Harry I. 2011. Anther, pollen and tapetum development in saflower, Carthamus tinctorius L. Sexual Plant Reproduction 24: 307-317. [ Links ]

Yurukova-Grancharova P, Robeva-Davidova P, Vladimirov V. 2006. On the embryology and mode of reproduction of selected diploid species of Hieracium sl (Asteraceae) from Bulgaria. Flora 201: 668-675. [ Links ]

Received: April 29, 2014; Accepted: July 01, 2014

2 Author for correspondence: jmarzinek@gmail.com

Creative Commons License This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.