SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.32 issue4Potential effects of mechanically removing macrophytes on the phytoplankton community of a subtropical reservoirThe presence of Fabaceae in the pollen profile of propolis produced in northeastern Brazil author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

Share


Acta Botanica Brasilica

Print version ISSN 0102-3306On-line version ISSN 1677-941X

Acta Bot. Bras. vol.32 no.4 Belo Horizonte Oct./Dec. 2018  Epub July 30, 2018

http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0102-33062018abb0031 

Article

Changes in the taxonomic structure of periphytic algae on a free-floating macrophyte (Utricularia foliosa L.) in relation to macrophyte richness over seasons

Thiago Rodrigues dos Santos1  * 
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8191-7827

Carla Ferragut1 
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4313-1436

1Núcleo de Pesquisa em Ecologia, Instituto de Botânica, 04301-902, São Paulo, SP, Brazil

ABSTRACT

Periphyton has a strong relationship with aquatic macrophytes, which are key components of spatial heterogeneity in the littoral zone. We evaluated the relationship between the community structure of periphytic algae on Utricularia foliosa and macrophyte richness and coverage and limnological variables in a shallow reservoir. Water sampling for physical, chemical and biological analyses was performed at sites with contrasting macrophyte coverage and richness in each of the four main seasons of the year. Periphytic algae were evaluated for density and species composition. High densities of diatoms and filamentous cyanobacteria in the periphyton were observed at sites with high macrophyte coverage and richness, while high abundances of flagellates of Chrysophyceae and Chlorophyceae were found at sites with low macrophyte richness. Light and nutrient availability were determining factors of the temporal variability of the periphytic algae community. We concluded that the interaction between seasonality and spatial heterogeneity (macrophyte community structure and limnological variables), explained the variability in species composition and algal density of the periphyton. Therefore, seasonality and spatial heterogeneity acted as determining factors for periphyton structure on a free-floating macrophyte with high structural complexity.

Keywords: epiphytic algae; limnological variables; macrophyte structure; spatial heterogeneity; species composition

Introduction

Periphytic communities play an important role in the functioning of lake and reservoir ecosystems, especially those that are shallow. At the scale of the ecosystem, biotic and abiotic factors can determine algal community structure in periphyton (Stevenson 1997). Among biotic factors, macrophytes are likely to have a strong influence on the development of periphyton. Besides providing areas for colonization, macrophytes can influence light and nutrient availability for the periphyton community (Moeller et al. 1988; Souza et al. 2015). Most studies recognize that seasonal variation in light and nutrient availability are determining factors of periphyton structure (Larned 2010), including changes between clear and turbid phases of shallow lakes (Cano et al. 2012). In addition, biotic and abiotic variables can vary spatially, which can promote the heterogeneous distribution of periphyton in the littoral zone. Spatial heterogeneity of nutrients is a mechanism that maintains periphytic algae species diversity (Pringle 1990). Nonetheless, spatial changes in the taxonomic structure of periphytic algae communities are still poorly understood, especially in tropical lakes and reservoirs.

We investigated the periphyton that occurs upon Utricularia foliosa, which is a free-floating, submerged, carnivorous, aquatic macrophyte that is widely distributed among tropical and subtropical aquatic ecosystems (Guisande et al. 2007; Walker 2004). Many ecological processes depend on submerged macrophytes, such as the retention of nutrients, the minimization of sediment resuspension, and the sedimentation of suspended matter, while they also compete, together with periphyton, with phytoplankton for nutrients and light (Kosten et al. 2009). Most research on the periphyton on Utricularia has focused on their prey-predator relationship (e.g. Manjarrés-Hernández et al. 2006), while few studies have addressed the taxonomic structure of the periphytic algal community (Díaz-Olarte et al. 2007; Santos et al. 2013). According to Díaz-Olarte et al. (2007), the abundance and species richness of periphytic algae on U. foliosa depend mostly on environmental conditions, rather than on mechanisms of facilitation by the plant. Santos et al. (2013) showed that the architecture (structure, size, and surface area) of Utricularia foliosa can be a determining factor of periphytic algae community structure. Thus, the architecture of Utricularia, combined with abiotic and biotic variables, influences periphyton biomass accumulation, nutrient status and algal biovolume.

Macrophytes play an important role in structuring communities, especially since they provide physical structure that increases habitat complexity and heterogeneity (Thomaz & Cunha 2010). Studies have also shown that changes in macrophyte richness can influence periphyton biomass (Engelhardt & Ritchie 2002) and taxonomic structure, on artificial substrate and Nymphaea (Souza et al. 2015; Pellegrini & Ferragut 2018). Thus, our objective was to analyze the relationship between periphyton on Utricularia foliosa and macrophyte richness and coverage, and limnological variables, over seasons in a shallow reservoir. Variation in macrophyte richness and limnological variables, mainly light and nutrient availability, were used to analyze spatial heterogeneity and its effects on periphyton. Since limnological conditions vary seasonally and spatially, along with macrophyte community structure, we hypothesized that the taxonomic structure of periphytic algae on U. foliosa would be influenced by seasonality and by changes in macrophyte community structure. We aimed to address the following questions: i) Does the taxonomic structure of the periphytic algae community on U. foliosa vary seasonally and spatially? ii) Do these changes vary among sites, with their varying levels of macrophyte richness, within the reservoir? By considering these questions, this study contributes to a better understanding of the relationship between periphyton and macrophytes on temporal and spatial scales in a shallow tropical reservoir.

Materials and methods

Study area

The study took place in Ninfeias Lake, an artificial reservoir located in Parque Estadual das Fontes do Ipiranga (PEFI), in the city of São Paulo, São Paulo State, Brazil (23º38’18.95”S 46º37’16.3”W). The reservoir is a shallow mesotrophic system with a surface area of 5,433 m2, a volume of 7,170 m3, a mean depth of 1.32 m, a maximum depth of 3.6 m, and a mean theoretical residence time of seven days (Bicudo et al. 2002).

Sampling design

Periphyton and water samples were collected at sites with the presence of only Utricularia foliosa L. (monospecific sites) and sites with other species of macrophytes. Samplings were performed in autumn (May, 2010), winter (July, 2010), spring (October, 2010) and summer (January, 2011). A total of 30-40 sites of 10 m2 were identified along a 1-km stretch of shoreline, each with distinct macrophyte species richness, as described in Souza et al. (2015). Sites were categorized as follows: Uf, U. foliosa sites; 2M, sites with two species of macrophytes (Nymphaea spp. and U. foliosa); 3M, sites with three species (Nymphaea spp., U. foliosa and Panicum repens L.); 4M, sites with four species (Nymphaea spp., U. foliosa, P. repens, Eleocharis acutangular (Roxb.) Schult., and/or Eichhornia azurea Kunth.). We randomly selected three sites from each category for a total of 12 sites to be sampled each season (48 samples).

Sampling occurred within 1 m2 areas demarcated by a square made of PVC pipe. Water and periphyton samples were collected and macrophyte coverage measured for each of the areas. The periphyton on U. foliosa was obtained from stem internodes. Very young and senescent plants were excluded from sampling to minimize the effects of differences in colonization time. The cut stems were placed in glass flasks, which were then placed in coolers with ice and protected from light, for transport to the laboratory. In the laboratory, the periphyton was carefully removed from stems by scraping with a brush with soft bristles and washing with distilled water. Sub-samples were used for quantitative analysis. We measured the length and width of stems to determine substrate area (cylinder area).

Variables analyzed

Periphyton subsamples were preserved with acetic Lugol’s solution for counting algae, which was performed with a Zeiss Axiovert inverted microscope, according to Utermöhl (1958). Counting was performed on transects with the count limit being defined using the species rarefaction curve and until 100 individuals of the most common species was reached (Ferragut et al. 2013). Descriptor species were considered those that contributed ≥ 10 % to total density. Species with a relative density equal to or greater than 50 % of the total sample density were considered dominant. Taxonomic samplings were preserved with 4 % formaldehyde solution, and permanent diatom slides were prepared according to Battarbee et al. (2001). The algae were classified according to life form type: colonial, flagellate, filamentous and unicellular (Graham & Wilcox 2000).

Macrophyte species were counted and their coverage estimated at the sampling sites. Percentage coverage was determined using a grid of 100 squares of 10 cm x 10 cm within the 1 m2 area (Thomaz et al. 2004). A single observer conducted the macrophyte quantification for purposes of standardization.

Air temperature, solar radiation and rainfall data were provided by the Meteorological Station of the University of São Paulo (estacao.iag.usp.br). Water temperature, transparency (Secchi disk) and subaquatic radiation (LiCor LI-250A) were measured at each sampling site. Water samples were filtered under low pressure (<0.3 atm) with fiberglass filters (GF/F Whatman, Maidstone, UK) for analysis of dissolved nutrients. The following variables were analyzed on the day of sampling: electrical conductivity (conductivity meter Digimed); dissolved oxygen (DO, Golterman et al. 1978); alkalinity (Golterman & Clymo 1971); pH (pH meter Digimed); dissolved inorganic carbon, nitrite and nitrate (Mackereth et al. 1978); ammonium (Solorzano 1969); orthophosphate and total dissolved phosphorus (TDP) (Strickland & Parsons 1960); orthosilicate (Golterman et al. 1978); total nitrogen; and total phosphorus (Valderrama 1981).

Data analysis

We used permutational multivariate analysis of variance (Two-way PERMANOVA) to analyze changes in the species composition of periphytic algal communities among seasons and sites with different macrophyte richness. This analysis was performed using the Bray-Curtis distance measure and 4999 permutations in Past 3.14 (Hammer et al. 2001).

Redundancy analysis (RDA) was used to evaluate the relationships between the periphytic algae (relative density ≥ 1 % of total density) and environmental variables at sites with different macrophyte richness during the four seasons. This analysis was performed because the species ordering by DCA (detrended correspondence analysis) showed that the gradient length was < 2.0, indicating that the relationship between algal density and the environmental gradient was linear (Birks 2010). The main matrix was composed of the periphytic algae species that contributed ≥ 2 % to the total density, while the second matrix was composed of six abiotic variables, which were selected based on PCA (Principal Component Analysis). These analyses were performed using the covariance matrix with abiotic and biotic data transformed by logarithm log (x + 1). A Monte Carlo randomization test was performed, and we considered those axes with p < 0.05 as interpretable. Ordinations were performed using the PC-ORD 6.0 program (McCune & Mefford 2006).

Results

Abiotic variables

Table 1 shows the abiotic characterization of the water at the sites sampled in each of the four seasons.

Table 1  Mean values of water depth, temperature and nutrient concentration (n = 3) at sites with different macrophyte richness in the four seasons. Abbreviations: Uf: Utricularia foliosa sites, 2-4M sites 2-4 macrophyte species (Data of 2M, 3M e 4M sites obtained in Pellegrini & Ferragut 2018).  

Autumn Winter Spring Summer
Uf 2M 3M 4M Uf 2M 3M 4M Uf 2M 3M 4M Uf 2M 3M 4M
Conductivity (µS cm-2) 57.4 57.5 56.8 57.3 56.7 56.7 54.1 57.0 53.6 56.8 57.1 58.0 47.6 46.8 46.2 49.6
Dissolved Oxygen (mg L-1) 3.9 3.0 3.9 4.4 4.4 4.8 5.6 6.0 4.4 4.6 4.1 4.5 2.2 6.5 1.8 3.2
Free CO2 (mg L-1) 16.4 16.7 14.0 13.4 16.4 16.7 14.0 13.4 32.4 15.0 23.3 21.7 9.5 7.0 11.6 11.3
HCO3 (mg L-1) 12.0 13.7 12.4 11.4 16.0 13.9 15.9 9.4 17.6 17.6 17.4 16.5 16.3 15.9 18.1 15.2
pH 6.1 6.1 6.2 6.2 6.0 6.2 6.1 5.9 6.5 6.6 6.4 6.4 6.1 6.1 6.1 6.1
Nitrogen Inorganic Dissolved (µg L-1) 1316 1172 1264 1550 670 1322 520 1072 178 194 143 320 611 585 317 922
Orthosilicate (mg L-1) 2.4 2.1 2.3 2.3 3.16 2.95 3.09 3.38 2.26 2.52 2.44 2.03 2.99 3.08 3.00 3.23
Subaquatic radiation (µmol m2 s2) 268.5 173.3 160.1 153.0 353.9 155.9 222.7 163.8 698.8 1197.5 927.5 1031.8 76.6 250.4 415.4 503.6
Total Dissolved Phosphorus (µg L-1) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.7 5.2 6.3 6.1 5.9 7.2 5.7 8.9
Total Phosphorus (µg L-1) 20.9 14.4 23.3 28.4 9.8 7.2 10.6 9.9 10.5 8.5 12.8 13.3 14.3 13.1 15.9 17.9
Total Nitrogen (µg L-1) 2558 1495 2175 2606 774 1504 943 1146 375 331 305 490 563 582 364 926
Temperature (°C) 22.0 22.5 22.0 22.0 18.1 19.7 18.7 19.1 21.6 22.8 21.9 21.5 24.9 24.9 25.0 24.1
Water Depth (m) 0.6 0.7 0.7 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.6 1.1 0.4 0.4 0.8 1.1 0.7 0.7

Utricularia foliosa

Regarding total macrophyte coverage, U. foliosa coverage was higher in spring and summer than in autumn and winter (Fig. 1).

Figure 1  Seasonal variation of Utricularia foliosa coverage and other macrophyte species at sites with different macrophyte richness in the four seasons (n = 3; Uf - U. foliosa; 2-4M = 2-4 macrophytes species). 

Periphyton

In total, 188 algal and cyanobacterial taxa were identified in the periphyton on U. foliosa: 65 Chlorophyceae; 49 Zygnematophyceae; 26 Bacillariophyceae; 15 Cyanobacteria; 14 Euglenophyceae; nine Chrysophyceae; four Xanthophyceae; three Cryptophyceae; two Oedogoniophyceae; and one Dinophyceae.

Based on algal class density, Bacillariophyceae, Chlorophyceae and Chrysophyceae were the most representative classes during the study period (Fig. 2A). Flagellate was the predominant life form of the periphyton at all sites (41-84 %), except in summer when the density of unicellular forms increased at Uf, 2M and 3M sites (Fig. 2B).

Figure 2  Relative density of algae classes (A) and life forms (B) in periphyton on Utricularia foliosa at sites with different macrophyte richness in four seasons (Uf = U. foliosa; 2-4M = 2 - 4 macrophyte species). 

The highest total density of periphytic algae was found at Uf sites in all seasons. The density of the descriptor species of the periphytic algae community on U. foliosa varied among seasons and sites with different macrophyte richness (Fig. 3A). The chrysophyte Chromulina elegans was the most abundant species in all seasons and at all sites, but its relative density varied among sites with different macrophyte richness (26-70 %). This species was dominant at Uf sites in autumn, winter and spring, 4M sites in autumn and spring and 2M sites in spring. The chlorophytes Chlamydomonas sagittula and Chlamydomonas epibiotica were more abundant at 3M and 4M sites in spring and summer (11-18 %). Other species also showed high relative density in summer, such as the cyanobacteria Pseudanabaena galeata and Synechoccocus nidulans at Uf sites (<11 %) and the diatoms Navicula cryptotenella and Frustulia crassinervia at 2M and 3M sites (13-17 %). A higher density of the cyanobacterium Anagnostidinema amphibium was found at Uf and 4M sites (26 % and 57 %, respectively) in spring (Fig. 3B).

Figure 3  Density of periphytic descriptor species (A) and Anagnostidinema amphibium (B) on U. foliosa at sites with different macrophyte richness in the four seasons (Uf = U. foliosa; 2 - 4M = 2-4 macrophyte species). 

Two-way PERMANOVA indicated that the species composition of the periphytic algal community on U. foliosa was significantly influenced by both season (F= 2.61; p = 0.0002) and the macrophyte richness of the site (F= 4.34; p = 0.0002); the interaction between space and time was significant (F= 0.58; p = 0.0002).

RDA was performed with six abiotic variables and 46 periphytic algal species on U. foliosa (Fig. 4, Tab. 2). The eigenvalues for axes 1 ((= 8.83) and 2 (( = 4.15) explained 28.2 % of the total variability. The high species-environment correlation for axes 1 (r = 0.98) and 2 (r = 0.89) indicated a strong relationship between species distribution and environmental variables. A Monte Carlo randomization test showed that both axes are interpretable (p < 0.05). The interest correlations showed that TDP, subaquatic radiation and temperature were the most important variables in the ordination axis 1 (r > 0.8). The first ordination axis represented seasonality, showing that spring and summer samplings were associated with higher values of subaquatic radiation, temperature and TDP (r > - 0.9). On the positive side of axis 1, the winter and autumn samplings were correlated with high ammonium concentration (r = 0.6). In relation to axis 1, Chlamydomonas planctogloea, Cryptomonas erosa, Aphanocapsa elachista, Leptolyngbya tenuis, Desmodesmus spinosus, and Coenochloris fotti were correlated with autumn and winter (r > 0.6), while Trachelomonas curta, Frustulia rhomboides, Protocryptomonas ellipsoidea, and Monoraphidium tortile were correlated with spring and summer (r > 0.5).

Table 2  Pearson correlation of periphytic algae density on Utricularia foliosa with RDA axes 1 and 2, and their respective codes. 

Taxa Code Axis 1 Axis 2
Aphanocapsa elachista West & G.S.West Aela -0.771 -0.358
Chlamydomonas planctogloea Skuja Cpla -0.884 -0.286
Closterium dianae Ehrenberg ex Ralfs Cdia -0.309 0.504
Coenochloris fottii (Hindák) Komárek Cfot -0.606 -0.328
Cosmarium sp. Cosm 0.454 -0.593
Cryptomonas erosa Ehrenberg Cero -0.846 -0.139
Cymbopleura naviculiformis (Auerswald ex Heiberg) Krammer Cnav -0.576 0.541
Desmodesmus spinosus (Chodat) E.Hegewald Dspi -0.647 0.027
Eunotia sudetica Otto Müller Esud -0.184 0.655
Frustulia rhomboides (Ehrenberg) De Toni Frho 0.619 -0.199
Leptolyngbya tenuis (Gomont) Anagnostidis & Komárek Lten -0.764 -0.205
Monoraphidium irregulare (G.M.Smith) Komárková-Legnerová Mirr 0.478 -0.548
Monoraphidium tortile (West & G.S.West) Komárková-Legnerová Mtor 0.840 0.422
Oedogonium sp. Oedo -0.564 -0.084
Protocryptomonas ellipsoidea Skv. ex Castro, C. Bicudo & D. Bicudo Peli 0.756 -0.205
Synechocystis aquatilis Sauvageau Saqu -0.518 -0.106
Trachelomonas curta A.M.Cunha Tcur 0.515 0.054

Figure 4  RDA diagram of periphytic algae species on Utricularia foliosa and six environmental variables. Score abbreviations: first letters refers to season (A-autumn, W-winter, Sp-spring, S-summer) and second letters indicates site categories (Uf - U. foliosa sites; 2-4M = 2-4 macrophytes species). Vector: NH4=N-NH4, Temp=water temperature, NO3=N-NO3, PO4=P-PO4, Rad=subaquatic radiation, HCO3=Bicarbonate. Species correlation with axes 1 and 2, and the respective codes are given in Table 2

Discussion

Our results showed that the taxonomic structure of the periphytic algae community on Utricularia foliosa changed among seasons and sites with different macrophyte richness, evidencing the heterogeneous distribution of the periphyton in the littoral zone. However, periphyton structure was determined by the interaction of factors, specifically seasonality and macrophyte richness in the reservoir. The influence of seasonality on the periphyton on macrophytes has been commonly reported for temperate lakes (e.g. Messyasz & Kuczyńska-Kippen 2006; Cano et al. 2012) and in Brazilian lakes and reservoirs (e.g. Felisberto & Rodrigues 2005; Pellegrini & Ferragut 2012). In the current reservoir, previous studies reported a negative relationship between periphytic algal density on Nymphaea and artificial substrate and total macrophyte coverage, since high coverage caused strong shading of the periphyton (Souza et al. 2015). Therefore, as observed on artificial substrate, periphyton on U. foliosa also differed among sites with different macrophyte richness in the four main seasons, evidencing temporally and spatially different habitat structures in the reservoir. Variation in macrophyte richness and coverage played significant roles in the taxonomic structure of the periphytic algae community on free-floating macrophytes.

Light and nutrient availability were determining factors for the temporal variability of the periphytic algae community on U. foliosa. Therefore, our results showed the strong influence of seasonal changes in limnological conditions on structural changes in periphytic algae community for all site categories. Although seasonality presented the greatest weight in the organization of algal assemblages of the periphyton, we found significant differences in species composition among the site categories. According to Souza et al. (2015) found that high macrophyte coverage influenced light availability for the periphyton in the studied reservoir. Although macrophyte architecture may favor periphyton development (Santos et al. 2013), algal density on U. foliosa was higher at monospecific sites. At the multispecies sites (2-4M), the most abundant macrophyte was Nymphaea spp., which can shade periphyton due to its large floating leaves. In comparison to Nymphaea spp., U. foliosa does not drastically reduce light availability to the periphyton via shading (Laugaste & Reunanen 2005). Studies have reported an inverse relationship between macrophyte coverage and algal density in periphyton on artificial substrate and Nymphaea (e.g. Souza et al. 2015). Thus, increased macrophyte richness and coverage did not favor the growth of periphytic algae on U. foliosa in all seasons.

We found a high predominance of flagellated forms, which indicates the high participation of algae loosely adhered to the periphyton on U. foliosa. In relation to the flagellate forms, the chrysophyte Chromulina elegans was the most representative species in the periphyton structure at all sites and in all seasons (except 4M sites / summer). This species is a nanoplanktonic algae, and has a high surface area:volume ratio, which allows greater uptake of nutrients (Happey-Wood 1988). Moreover, the cyanobacterium Anagnostidinema amphibium was found to be associated with the periphyton at Uf and 4M sites in spring, when metaphyton is generally abundant in the shallowest parts of the littoral zone. In the studied reservoir, this species forms dense masses (metaphyton) in the macrophyte stands or occurs floating freely (T Rodrigues et al. unpubl. res.). In addition, the depths of the Uf and 4M sites were lowest in the spring, which certainly favored a greater association between metaphyton and periphyton on Utricularia foliosa. A strong association between metaphyton and the epiphyton on Utricularia purpurea was observed in the Florida Everglades, where the green algae Spirogyra was more representative in the metaphyton and epiphyton during the wet season (McCormick et al. 1998). The growth form of Anagnostidinema amphibium is filamentous, which is an efficient adaptive strategy for periphyton that develops on macrophytes that move freely through the reservoir, as is the case with U. foliosa.

Conclusions

We conclude that variability in the species composition and algal density of the periphyton on U. foliosa were related to seasonality and the spatial heterogeneity of the environmental conditions. Spatial differences in limnological conditions and macrophyte community structure were determinant for the periphytic algae community structure, as evidenced by the heterogeneous distribution of the periphyton in the littoral zone. As hypothesized, the community structure of periphytic algal was influenced by seasonality and differences in macrophyte community structure. Therefore, despite the recognized host macrophyte influence (e.g. Burkholder 1996), the periphyton on U. foliosa was influenced by environmental conditions on temporal and spatial scales. Our findings increase understanding of the factors driving periphyton structure on Utricularia foliosa, a macrophyte that is widely distributed among Brazilian reservoirs.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge the FAPESP (Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo) for a master degree scholarship to T.R. Santos (Grant no 2009/11721-5) and financial support (Grant no 2009/52253-4). We are grateful to all the students and technicians involved in the laboratory and fieldwork.

References

Battarbee RW, Jones V, Flower RJ, et al. 2001. Diatoms. In: Smol JP, Birks HJB, Last WM. (eds.) Tracking environmental change using lake sediments. Vol. 3. London, Kluwer Academic Publishers. p. 155-203. [ Links ]

Bicudo CEM, Carmo CF, Bicudo DC, et al. 2002. Morfologia e morfometria de três reservatórios do PEFI. In: Bicudo DC, Forti MC, Bicudo CEM. (eds.) Parque Estadual das Fontes do Ipiranga: unidade de conservação ameaçada pela urbanização de São Paulo. São Paulo, Secretaria do Meio Ambiente do Estado de São Paulo. p. 141-158. [ Links ]

Birks HJB. 2010. Numerical methods for the analysis of diatom assemblage data. In: Smol JP, Stoerme EF. (eds.) The diatoms: Applications for the environmental and earth science. 2nd. edn. New York, Cambridge University Press. p. 23-54. [ Links ]

Burkholder JM. 1996. Interaction of benthic algae with their substrata. In: Stevenson RJ, Bothwell ML, Lowe RL. (eds.) Algal ecology: freshwater benthic ecosystems. San Diego, Academic Press. p. 253-298. [ Links ]

Cano M, Casco M, Claps M. 2012. Effect of environmental variables on epiphyton in a Pampean lake with stable turbid-and clear-water states. Aquatic Biology 15: 47-59. [ Links ]

Díaz-Olarte J, Valoyes-Valois V, Guisande C, et al. 2007. Periphyton and phytoplankton associated with the tropical carnivorous plant Utricularia foliosa. Aquatic Botany 87: 285-291. [ Links ]

Engelhardt KAM, Ritchie ME. 2002. The effect of aquatic plant species richness on wetland ecosystem functioning. Ecology 83: 2911-2924. [ Links ]

Felisberto SA, Rodrigues L. 2005. Influência do gradiente longitudinal (rio-barragem) na similaridade das comunidades de desmídias perifíticas. Revista Brasileira de Botânica 28: 241-254. [ Links ]

Ferragut C, Bicudo DC, Vercellino IS. 2013. Amostragem e medidas de estrutura da comunidade perifítica. In: Schwarzbold A, Burliga AL, Torgan LC. (eds.) Ecologia do perifíton. São Carlos, Rima. p. 157-177. [ Links ]

Golterman HL, Clymo RS. 1971. Methods for chemical analysis of freshwaters. Oxford/London, Blackwell Scientific Publications. [ Links ]

Golterman HL, Clymo RS, Ohmstad MAM. 1978. Methods for physical and chemical analysis of freshwaters. Oxford/London, Blackwell Scientific Publications. [ Links ]

Graham LE, Wilcox LW. 2000. Algae. New Jersey, Prentice Hall. [ Links ]

Guisande C, Granado-Lorencio C, Andrade-Sossa C, Duque SR. 2007. Bladderworts. Functional Plant Science and Biotechnology 1: 58-68. [ Links ]

Hammer O, Harper DAT, Ryan PD. 2001. PAST: Paleontological Statistics software package for education and data analysis. Palaeontologia Electronica 4: 1-9. [ Links ]

Happey-Wood, C.M. 1988. Ecology of freshwater planktonic green algae. In: Sandgren CD. (ed.). Growth and reproductive strategies of freshwater phytoplankton. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. p. 103-133Inserir páginas. [ Links ]

Kosten S, Lacerot G, Jeppesen E, et al. 2009. Effects of submerged vegetation on water clarity across climates. Ecosystems 12: 1117-1129. [ Links ]

Larned ST. 2010. A prospectus for periphyton: recent and future ecological research. Journal North American Benthological Society 29: 182-206. [ Links ]

Laugaste R, Reunanen M. 2005. The composition and density of epiphyton on some macrophyte species in the partly meromictic Lake Verevi. Hydrobiologia 547: 137-150. [ Links ]

Mackereth FJH, Heron J, Talling JF. 1978. Water analysis: some revised methods for limnologists. London, Titus Wilson and Son Ltda. [ Links ]

Manjarrés-Hernández A, Guisande C, Torres NN, et al. 2006. Temporal and spatial change of the investment in carnivory of the tropical Utricularia foliosa. Aquatic Botany 85: 212-218. [ Links ]

McCormick PV, Shuford III RBE, Backus JG, Kennedy WC. 1998. Spatial and seasonal patterns of periphyton biomass and productivity in the northern Everglades, Florida, U.S.A. Hydrobiologia 362: 185-208 [ Links ]

McCune B, Mefford MJ. 2006. PC-ORD, version 5.0, Multivariate analysis of ecological data. Glaneden Beach, MjM Solfware Desing. [ Links ]

Messyasz B, Kuczyńska-Kippen N. 2006. Periphytic algal communities: A comparison of Typha angustifolia L. and Chara tomentosa L. beds in three shallow lakes (West Poland). Polish Journal of Ecology 54: 15-27. [ Links ]

Moeller RE, Burkholder JM, Wetzel RG. 1988. Significance of sedimentary phosphorus to a rooted submersed macrophyte (Najas flexilis (Willd.) Rostk. and Schmidt) and its algal epiphytes. Aquatic Botany 32: 261-281. [ Links ]

Pellegrini BG, Ferragut C. 2012. Variação sazonal e sucessional da comunidade de algas perifíticas em substrato natural em um reservatório mesotrófico tropical. Acta Botanica Brasilica 26: 807-818. [ Links ]

Pellegrini BG, Ferragut C. 2018. Associations between epiphyton species composition and macrophyte diversity in a shallow tropical reservoir. Fundamental and Applied Limnology 191: 111-122. [ Links ]

Pringle CM. 1990. Nutrient spatial heterogeneity: effects on community structure, physiognomy, and diversity of stream algae. Ecology 71: 905-920. [ Links ]

Santos TR, Ferragut C, Bicudo CEM. 2013. Does macrophyte architecture influence periphyton? Relationships among Utricularia foliosa, periphyton assemblage structure and its nutrient (C, N, P) status. Hydrobiologia 714: 71-83. [ Links ]

Solorzano L. 1969. Determination of ammonia in natural waters by the phenolhypochlorite method. Limnology and Oceanography 14: 799-801. [ Links ]

Souza ML, Pellegrini BG, Ferragut C. 2015. Periphytic algal community structure in relation to seasonal variation and macrophyte richness in a shallow tropical reservoir. Hydrobiologia 755: 183-196. [ Links ]

Stevenson RJ. 1997. Scale-dependent determinants and consequences of benthic algal heterogeneity. Journal of North American Benthological Society 16: 248-262. [ Links ]

Strickland JDH, Parsons TR. 1960. A manual of seawater analysis. Journal of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada 125: 1-185. [ Links ]

Thomaz SM, Bini LM, Pagioro TA. 2004. Métodos em Limnologia: macrófitas aquáticas. In: Bicudo CEM, Bicudo DC. (eds.) Amostragem em Limnologia. São Carlos, RimaEditora. p. 193-212. [ Links ]

Thomaz SM, Cunha ER. 2010. The role of macrophytes in habitat structuring in aquatic ecosystems: methods of measurement, causes and consequences on animal assemblages composition and biodiversity. Acta Limnologica Brasiliensia 22: 218-236. [ Links ]

Utermöhl H. 1958. Zur Vervolkomnung der quantitative phytoplankton: metodik. Internationale Vereinigung für Theoretische und Angewandte Limnologie 9: 1-38. [ Links ]

Valderrama GC. 1981. The simultaneous analysis of total nitrogen and total phosphorus in natural waters. Marine Chemistry 10: 109-112. [ Links ]

Walker I. 2004. Trophic interactions within the in Utricularia habitat the reservoir of the Balbina hydroelectric power plant (Amazonas, Brazil). Acta Limnologica Brasiliensia 16: 183-191. [ Links ]

Received: January 29, 2018; Accepted: May 09, 2018

* Corresponding author: thiagos88@gmail.com

Creative Commons License This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License