Increased atmospheric CO₂ changes the photosynthetic responses of Acrocomia aculeata (Arecaceae) to drought

ABSTRACT

Water availability is the main factor that explains current patterns of palm abundance. However, the interaction between water stress and increasing atmospheric CO₂ concentrations caused by climatic change and its effects on palm physiology remain poorly known. Macauba palm is a widespread Neotropical species commonly found in ecosystems subjected to seasonal drought and has potential use in oil production. The present work investigated the influence of increased CO₂ concentrations on photosynthetic responses to drought in macauba palm plants. Exposure to increased CO₂ concentrations led to up-regulation of photosynthesis through higher stomatal conductance and improved light and water use efficiency. Macauba palm plants under water stress, irrespective of CO₂ concentration, were able to maintain constant levels of proline and chlorophyll, while preventing oxidative damage. Plants grown at higher CO₂ concentrations were more capable of recovering from drought due to higher Rubisco carboxylation rate (Vc _max) and electron transport rate (J _max), which prevented a reduction in total dry mass at the end of the stress period. Stomatal control of photosynthesis, coupled with the prevention of severe damage under stress, would allow efficient biomass production by the macauba palm under future scenarios of climate change.

Keywords:
climate change; photosynthesis; palm; water stress; water use efficiency

Introduction

The effects of climate change on photosynthesis in C₃ plants are mainly related to the positive effect of increased atmospheric CO₂ concentration ([CO₂]) on the carboxylation capacity of Rubisco and to decreased transpiration rate (Long et al. 2004). Responses of leaf photosynthesis and transpiration to high [CO₂] conditions are due to the suppression of photorespiration and increased supply of Rubisco substrate, accompanied by the partial closure of the stomata (Ainsworth & Long 2005; Leakey et al. 2009). Although some initial stimulus of photosynthesis can be observed immediately upon exposure to high [CO₂], photosynthetic capacity is often reduced after a long-term growth at elevated CO₂ levels (Leakey et al. 2009; Córdoba et al. 2017). This photosynthetic acclimation in plants exposed to long-term high [CO₂] is commonly defined as down-regulation of photosynthesis, a process triggered by cumulative reduction in the content of Rubisco in leaves and the concomitant reduction in the photosynthetic electron transport rate (ETR), along with source-sink imbalance (Ainsworth et al. 2004; Long et al. 2004; Gamage et al. 2018). Plant productivity with elevated [CO₂] can also be limited by nutrient availability, since significant reductions in nitrogen concentration and increase in the C:N ratio are observed in plants exposed to high [CO₂]. However, the response of palm species to elevated [CO₂] remains poorly understood (Walther et al. 2007; Ibrahim et al. 2010; Renninger & Phillips 2016).

Increased air temperature and droughts can occur synergistically with increased [CO₂], which may be even more compromising to the survival of palm species (Renninger & Phillips 2016; Safronov et al. 2017; Dusenge et al. 2019). Therefore, the capacity to withstand or avoid water stress can dictate the resistance of palms to drought and their biogeographic distribution (Pinheiro & Chaves 2011; Renninger & Phillips 2016; Esquivel-Muelbert et al. 2017). Palm species richness is generally centered in tropical and subtropical ecosystems characterized by constant water availability and a warm climate (Bjorholm et al. 2005; Eiserhardt et al. 2011). Palms occurring in savanna environments generally have higher stomatal conductance (g _s) and lower water use efficiency than woody and herbaceous species (Rossatto & Franco 2017). However, some palm species are described as resistant to drought, including the macauba palm (Acrocomia aculeata), which is also distributed in dry regions throughout the American tropics (Oliveira et al. 2002; Gomes et al. 2008; Pires et al. 2013; Medeiros et al. 2015; Mota & Cano 2016). The macauba palm grows in large populations either in degraded or natural areas with relatively fertile soils and annual rainfall of less than 1,500 mm (Motta et al. 2002; Ratter et al. 2003). Besides having efficient response mechanisms for water deficit, such as efficient stomatal control, increased water use efficiency and rapid recovery after rehydration (Mota & Cano 2016; Oliveira et al. 2016), A. aculeata also exhibits considerable resilience to fire (Bicalho et al. 2016) and photosynthetic adjustments that allow its establishment in various light conditions (Dias et al. 2018).

While the effects of water scarcity on A. aculeata have been addressed by some works (Mota & Cano 2016; Oliveira et al. 2016), its interaction with increasing [CO₂] caused by climate change remain to be elucidated. This study tests the hypothesis that the response of macauba palm to reduced soil water content is attenuated by long-term increase in [CO₂]. With higher [CO₂], macauba palm plants under water deficit should sustain a satisfactory photosynthetic rate while preventing excessive water loss through partial stomatal closure and conservation of RWC in leaves. However, photosynthetic acclimation to increased [CO₂] (Ainsworth et al. 2004), along with reduced Rubisco carboxylation rate and impaired light utilization accentuated by drought, should prevent fast recovery of photosynthesis after rewatering in successive drought cycles. This study also tested the hypothesis that these physiological effects will impair vegetative growth of macauba palm resulting in less biomass accumulation, primarily in water-stressed plants. Thus, the aim of this work was to investigate the influence of increased [CO₂] on the responses of photosynthesis and biomass production under drought in macauba palm plants. We evaluated whether the capacity of stress response and recovery of photosynthesis after successive water stress cycles are influenced by rising [CO₂] due to adjustments in plant growth, carboxylation capacity, stomatal responses, water status, chlorophyll content, and light use efficiency of macauba palm plants.

Materials and methods

Experimental conditions

The experiment was conducted in open-top chambers installed outside a greenhouse, as described by Silva et al. (Silva et al. 2012), located at the Federal University of Viçosa, Campus Florestal, Minas Gerais State, Brazil (575 m a.s.l., 19°53ʹ84ʺS 44°25ʹ68ʺE). Individual three-month-old saplings of Acrocomia aculeata (Jacq.) Lodd. Ex Mart were transplanted into 8-liter plastic pots filled with a mixture of soil, sand, and cattle manure (2:1:1) fertilized with 8 kg m^-3 simple superphosphate, 1 kg m^-3 ammonium sulfate and 0.3 kg m^-3 potassium chloride. Topdressing-fertilization was carried out during cultivation at 3-month intervals using 0.5 g urea, 0.5 g potassium chloride and 0.25 g magnesium sulfate per plant. The soil characteristics were the same as reported by Souza et al. (2016). Fifty-seven days after transplanting, when all 20 plants used in the experiment resumed growth as confirmed by the development of new leaves, 10 plants were exposed to treatments with increased CO₂ concentration [CO₂]₇₀₀ (700 μmol mol^˗1), while the other 10 plants remained in chambers with current CO₂ concentration [CO₂]₄₀₀ (400 μmol mol^˗1). Both groups were irrigated daily and the CO₂ concentration inside the chambers was monitored daily with a Testo 535 CO₂ measuring device (Testo SE & Co. KGaA, Campinas, Brazil).

Mean photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) measured inside and outside the open-top chambers was 1690 and 2070 μmol photons m^-2 s^-1, respectively, both measured at midday with the aid of a radiometer (model HD 2102.2, Delta OHM, Brazil). Mean ambient temperature (24.7 ± 0.77 ºC), relative humidity (50.1 ± 4.8 %) and vapor pressure deficit (1.59 ± 0.18 kPa) were measured using an infrared gas analyzer (IRGA; model LI-6400XT, Li-Cor Inc., Lincoln, NE, USA). After 320 days, five plants in each CO₂ treatment were exposed to water deficit by suppressing irrigation until net photosynthetic rate approximated 0 µmol m^˗2 s^˗1, at which point the plants were rehydrated to full recovery. The plants were exposed to three cycles of water withholding and rehydration. All measurements described below were made on the first fully-expanded pinnate leaf (using leaflets of the middle-leaf portion). The entire period of exposure to [CO₂] lasted 393 days.

Evaluation of photosynthetic responses to drought and CO ₂ concentrations

Leaf gas exchange during the entire period (74 days) of water deficit cycles was measured using a portable IRGA (LI-6400xt; LI-COR Inc., Lincoln, NE, USA). All treatments were measured from 8:00 to 11:00 at current CO₂ concentrations (ranging from 392 to 403 μmol CO₂ mol^˗1) with a light intensity of 1,200 µmol photons m^˗2 s^˗1 provided by the LI-6400xt internal light-emitting diode light source (6400-02B Red-Blue; Li-Cor Inc., USA). Net photosynthetic rate (A, µmol m^˗2 s^˗1), stomatal conductance (g _s, mol m^˗2 s^˗1), transpiration rate (E, mmol m^˗2 s^˗1), the ratio between intercellular and atmospheric CO₂ concentration (Ci/Ca), and instantaneous water use efficiency (W _t = A/E, µmol CO₂ mmol H₂O m^˗2 s^˗1) were evaluated. Simultaneously with gas exchange evaluation, chlorophyll a fluorescence was measured in light-acclimated leaves (1,200 µmol photons m^˗2 s^˗1 for 120 s) using an integrated fluorescence chamber (LI-6400-40; Li-Cor Inc., USA). Steady-state fluorescence yield (F) was measured following a saturating light pulse that was applied to achieve light-acclimated maximum fluorescence (F _m′). The actinic light was then turned off and far-red illumination was applied (2 µmol m^-2 s^-1) to measure light-acclimated minimum fluorescence (F ₀′). The effective quantum yield of PSII in the illuminated leaf was determined according to Genty et al. (1989) using the formula: φ_II = (F _m' - F/F _m'). Apparent electron transport rate (ETR) was calculated as: ETR = φ_II × PAR × I _A × 0.5; where 0.5 is the fraction of the excitation energy distribution in PSII (Melis et al. 1987), I _A is the leaflet absorptivity coefficient, and PAR is the photosynthetically active radiation.

Total leaf chlorophyll content was measured periodically in the same leaves used for gas exchange analysis using a ClorofiLOG portable chlorophyll meter (Falker, Porto Alegre, Brazil). Each leaflet was evaluated based on the mean of three measurements taken from the leaflet lamina, while avoiding the midrib region.

After the third water deficit cycle, the response of A to Ci (A vs Ci) was measured in all plants (n=5 in each treatment) changing the reference CO₂ concentration (400, 300, 200, 100, 50, 400, 500, 600, 700, 800, 1000, 1200, and 1300 μmol CO₂ mol^-1) under ambient temperature (23-25 ?C) and irradiance of 1,200 µmol photons m^-2 s^-1 using the CO₂ injector device of the LI-6400xt (6400-01 CO₂ injector; Li-Cor Inc., USA) equipped with 12-g high-pressure CO₂ cartridges. The maximum Rubisco (RuBP) carboxylation velocity (Vc _max), the electron transport rate associated with RuBP regeneration (J _max), and triose phosphate utilization (TPU) were calculated according to Sharkey et al. (2007). To avoid excessive stomatal effect on CO₂ diffusion, the A vs Ci curves were created one day after irrigation was resumed.

Measurements of leaflet water status in response to drought and rising CO ₂

The leaf water potential (Ψw) of the plants was measured at the end of each water deficit cycle (when photosynthesis reached 0 μmol m^-2 s^-1) using a pressure chamber (3005 Series, Soilmoisture Equipment Corp., Santa Barbara, USA) pressurized with nitrogen gas.

The determination of Ψw was done early in the morning (6:00 am) on the five plants of each treatment using leaflets opposite those used for gas exchange and fluorescence analysis. Leaflets were sectioned at the base and the central rib exposed with the aid of a sharp blade. The leaflets were then rolled and inserted into the rubber support in the pressure chamber. After measuring Ψw, the same leaflets were used to determine relative water content (RWC).

Relative water content was evaluated in leaf discs (4.5 cm²) cut in duplicate. After determining fresh weight (FW), the leaflets were placed in Petri dishes containing deionized water at room temperature for 20 h, the time required for macauba leaflets to reach maximum turgidity. Turgid weight (TW) was then determined and the leaflets placed to dry at 65 °C for 48 h to determine dry weight (DW). These data were used to calculate RWC using the following formula:

$$RWC=\frac{\left(FW-DW\right)}{\left(TW-DW\right)}\times 100$$ (1)

Analysis of lipid peroxidation and proline concentration in macauba palm leaves under drought at different CO ₂ concentration

The concentration of thiobarbituric acid-reacting substances (TBARS), as final products of lipid peroxidation, was measured at the end of each drought cycle in leaflets from the same leaves used for gas exchange analysis. We used the method described by Du & Bramlage (1992), which accounts for interferences conferred by carbohydrates as described by Pinto et al. (2016). The results were expressed in ng of TBARS per mg of dry weight (ng mg^-1).

Proline concentration of leaves was evaluated in dried leaflets collected from the same leaves used for TBARS analysis at the period of maximum stress during the third water stress cycle. The leaflets were extracted in 80 % ethanol following the ninhydrin method for proline quantification (Bates et al. 1973).

Evaluation of morphological analysis and dry mass accumulation

At the end of the experiment, total leaf number, stem height (cm), total root length (cm), and mean diameter of stem base (cm) were measured in all plants. Stem dry mass (g), total leaf dry mass (g), total root dry mass (g) and plant total dry mass were also destructively measured at the end of the experiment in plants of both treatments, [CO₂]₄₀₀ and [CO2]₇₀₀. It is worth mentioning that the stem described here corresponds to the subterranean bulb or pseudocaule characteristic of young palms.

Experimental design and statistical analysis

A randomized block design was implemented following a 2 x 2 factorial scheme with two atmospheric CO₂ concentrations (400 and 700 μmol mol⁻¹) and two conditions of water supply (well-watered plants and water-stressed plants). Each treatment was comprised five replications. The data were subjected to two-way repeated-measures analysis of variance (ANOVA), and the means compared using Tukey’s test at 5 % significance level using SAEG 9.1 (Fundação Arthur Bernardes, UFV, 2007). All data were evaluated for homogeneity of variance and normality prior to the ANOVA (Cochran’s Q and Lilliefors tests, respectively).

Results

Photosynthetic responses of macauba palm to increased atmospheric CO ₂ concentration and cyclic drought

The treatment with [CO₂]₇₀₀ resulted in significantly (p < 0.05) higher values for net photosynthesis (A), stomatal conductance (g _s) and transpiration (E), when the isolated effect of [CO₂] was evaluated. The net photosynthetic rate approximated zero (maximum stress), regardless of the CO₂ concentration, after 25 days of exposure to drought during the first cycle of water stress (Fig. 1A and B).Recovery after rehydration in the first stress cycle was reached after two days for plants grown at [CO₂]₇₀₀, but was delayed by five days for plants grown at [CO₂]₄₀₀. The time when plants reached maximum stress levels in the second and third cycle was reduced to 14 days in both CO₂ treatments, but the photosynthetic rate was significantly lower in plants grown at [CO₂]₄₀₀. The recovery period after rehydration in the second cycle of water stress lasted four days, and was the same in both CO₂ treatments (Fig. 1).

Figure 1
Values of: A, B. net photosynthetic rate (A); C, D. stomatal conductance (g _s); E, F. transpiration rate (E) in macauba palm plants after long-term exposure to [CO₂]₇₀₀ (700 μmol mol^˗1) (left panels) and [CO₂]₄₀₀ (400 μmol mol^˗1) (right panels). Filled symbols represent plants exposed to cyclic drought and open symbols represent well-watered plants, both grown in open-top chambers. The dotted lines separate the three cycles of water deficit, which are listed at the bottom of the graphs (E and F). mfAsterisks indicate significant differences between well-watered and water stress treatments at each CO₂ concentration, according to Tukey’s test (p < 0.05). Means ± SE (n = 5).

Despite the observed differences between the successive cycles of water withholding and rehydration, no significant interaction was observed between drought and CO₂ treatment for A, g _s and E (Tab. 1). In contrast, a significant statistical interaction for C _i/C _a and W _t responses to water limitation was dependent on current CO₂ concentration during plant growth (Tab. 1). The plants exposed to [CO₂]₄₀₀ had a higher C _i/C _a ratio when challenged by water deficit. In addition, only the plants at [CO₂]₇₀₀ were able to maintain high W _t under drought conditions (Tab. 1).

Table 1
The ratio between internal and external CO₂ concentration (Ci/Ca), instantaneous water use efficiency (W _t; µmol_CO2 ^-1 mmol_H2O ^-1 m^-2 s^-1) and proline concentration (µmol g_DW ^-1) in macauba palm plants after exposure to increased CO₂ level (700 μmol mol^˗1) or ambient CO₂ concentration (400 μmol mol^˗1). The plants were grown in open-top chambers and exposed to cyclic drought (ws) or irrigated daily (ww).

		Ci/Ca	W t	Proline
700	ws	0.57 ± 0.27 Ab	5.34 ± 3.24 Aa	44.36 ± 6.63 Aa
	ww	0.65 ± 0.09 Aa	4.58 ± 1.57 Aa	50.02 ± 5.25 Aa
400	ws	0.76 ± 0.27 Aa	2.61 ± 2.52 Bb	40.18 ± 6.85 Aa
	ww	0.66 ± 0.19 Aa	4.32 ± 1.04 Aa	38.45 ± 6.96 Aa

• Means followed by the same letter in columns do not differ according to Tukey’s test at 5 % significance level. Capital letters compare treatments with different CO₂ concentrations and lower case letters compare treatments with different water levels. Means ± SE (n = 5).

The exposure of macauba palm to [CO₂]₇₀₀ resulted in higher effective quantum yield (φ_II) of PSII and ETR (Fig. 2). The soil water deficit in the three consecutive stress cycles reduced φ_II, ETR and photochemical quenching (q _L) (Fig. 2). The effect of water deficit on the photochemical capacity of the plants was more severe in the second and third cycle, reaching lower values of φ_II, ETR, and q _L mainly in plants grown at [CO₂]₄₀₀ (Fig. 2). Despite changes in chlorophyll fluorescence response, drought did not impair total chlorophyll content of the leaflets, but a significant increase in chlorophyll was found in plants grown at [CO₂]₇₀₀ (Fig. S1 in supplementary material).

Figure 2
A, B. Effective quantum yield of PSII (φ_II); C, D. photochemical quenching (qL); E, F. electron transport rate (ETR) in macauba palm plants after long-term exposure to [CO₂]₇₀₀ (700 μmol mol^˗1) (left panels) and [CO₂]₄₀₀ (400 μmol mol^˗1) (right panels). Filled symbols represent plants exposed to cyclic drought and open symbols represent well-watered plants, both grown in open-top chambers. The dotted lines separate the three cycles of water deficit, which are listed at the bottom of the graphs (E and F). Asterisks indicate significant differences between well-watered and water stress treatments at each CO₂ concentration, according to Tukey’s test (p < 0.05). Means ± SE (n = 5).

The CO₂ response curves evaluated after the third water deficit cycle showed significantly higher Rubisco carboxylation velocity (Vc _max) and electron transport rate associated with RuBP regeneration (J _max) in plants grown at [CO₂]₇₀₀ (Fig. 3). However, when plants were subjected to water stress at both CO₂ concentrations, the Vc _max was reduced significantly (Fig. 3A, B), while the reduction of J _max was not significant (Fig. 3C, D). The TPU in photosynthesis was not affected by drought or CO₂ concentration (Fig. 3E, F).

Figure 3
A, B. Maximum Rubisco carboxylation velocity (Vc _max); C, D. electron transport rate (J _max); E, F. triose phosphate utilization (TPU) in macauba palm plants after long-term exposure to [CO₂]₇₀₀ (700 μmol mol^˗1) (left panels) and [CO₂]₄₀₀ (400 μmol mol^˗1) (right panels). Filled columns represent plants exposed to cyclic drought and open columns represent well-watered plants, both grown in open-top chambers. Uppercase letters compare treatments with different CO₂ concentrations and lowercase letters compare treatments with different water levels according to Tukey’s test (p < 0.05). Means ± SE (n = 5).

Changes in leaflet water status in response to drought and rising CO ₂ levels

The RWC was increased significantly in leaflets of plants grown at [CO₂]₇₀₀ (Fig. 4A, B). In addition, isolated effects of drought on RWC were observed in the three water stress cycles. At the end of the third cycle, the reduction of RWC in response to drought was more severe in plants grown at [CO₂]₄₀₀ than in plants grown at [CO₂]₇₀₀ (Fig. 4B ). In contrast, leaflet water potential (Ψ_w) was reduced by the cyclic drought but not by the CO₂ treatments (Fig. 4C, D). The plants grown in open-top chambers at [CO₂]₄₀₀ and exposed to water stress showed significantly lower values of Ψ_w in the second and third cycle of stress compared to plants grown at [CO₂]₇₀₀ (Fig. 4C, D).

Figure 4
A, B. Relative leaf water content (RWC); C, D. leaf water potential ((_w) in macauba palm plants after long-term exposure to [CO₂]₇₀₀ (700 μmol mol^˗1) (left panels) and [CO₂]₄₀₀ (400 μmol mol^˗1) (right panels). The plants were grown in open-top chambers and exposed to cyclical drought (filled columns) or irrigated daily (open columns). Uppercase letters compare treatments with different CO₂ concentrations and lowercase letters compare treatments with different water levels according to Tukey’s test (p < 0.05). Means ± SE (n = 5).

Water deficit and increased CO ₂ concentration did not lead to oxidative damage or proline accumulation

No significant differences were found in lipid peroxidation (Fig. S2 in supplementary material) or proline concentration (Tab. 1) in tissues of macauba palm leaflets in response to cyclic drought or increased CO₂ atmospheric concentration.

Morphological adjustments and dry mass accumulation in plants in response to CO ₂ and cyclic drought

A significant interaction between drought exposure and CO₂ concentration was observed for stem length and total dry mass accumulation (Tab. 2). Only plants grown at [CO₂]₇₀₀ did not exhibit reduced stem length and total biomass in response to drought. In addition, the stems of water-stressed plants at [CO₂]₇₀₀ were longer compared to those of water-stressed plants at [CO₂]₄₀₀ (Tab. 2). The [CO₂]₇₀₀ increased significantly the leaf number and stem dry mass of A. aculeata. Nonetheless, water stress cycles caused a reduction in leaf and root dry mass, regardless of CO₂ concentration. No significant changes in root length were observed as a response to drought or CO₂ levels.

Table 2
Morphological traits and dry mass accumulation in macauba palm plants after exposure to increased CO₂ level (700 μmol mol^˗1) or ambient CO₂ concentration (400 μmol mol^˗1). The plants were grown in open-top chambers and exposed to cyclic drought (ws) or irrigated daily (ww).

		Length (cm-1)		Leaf number	Dry mass (g-1)
		Stem	Root		Leaves	Stem	Root	Total
700	ws	39.0 ± 3.39 Aa	34.0 ± 4.49 Aa	5.8 ± 0.37 Aa	31.81 ± 3.47 Ab	43.33 ± 6.68 Aa	37.86 ± 2.34 Ab	113.00 ± 11.47 Aa
	ww	37.0 ± 3.70 Aa	34.4 ± 2.52 Aa	6.2 ± 0.20 Aa	40.31 ± 4.51 Aa	55.23 ± 6.65 Aa	44.79 ± 6.12 Aa	140.33 ± 12.68 Aa
400	ws	26.4 ± 2.23 Bb	33.6 ± 2.04 Aa	4.8 ± 0.20 Ba	31.58 ± 1.94 Ab	28.36 ± 2.64 Ba	37.65 ± 3.42 Ab	97.59 ± 4.93 Ab
	ww	33.10 ± 0.98 Aa	40.8 ± 4.55 Aa	5.6 ± 0.40 Ba	39.94 ± 3.08 Aa	37.83 ± 6.43 Ba	55.73 ± 3.45 Aa	133.50 ± 9.93 Aa

• Means followed by the same letter in columns do not differ according to Tukey’s test at 5 % significance level. Capital letters compare treatments with different CO₂ concentrations and lower case letters compare treatments with different levels of water. Means ± SE (n = 5).

Discussion

The higher photosynthetic responses linked to stomatal control in macauba palm leaves under water stress and [CO₂]₇₀₀ indicate no down-regulation of photosynthesis as commonly reported (Ainsworth & Long 2005; Leakey et al. 2009; Córdoba et al. 2017). In general, the stimulation of photosynthesis may cease partially or totally due to negative feedback effects, but the implications of exposure to high [CO₂] on trees are less clear compared to the responses of herbaceous species (Poorter & Navas 2003; Way et al. 2015; Ågren & Kattge 2017). In most plant species, stomatal apertures shorten after exposure to high [CO₂], which, together with TPU limitation, might contribute to downward acclimation of photosynthesis after plants are exposed to high [CO₂] (Ainsworth & Rogers 2007). Unlike for herbaceous plants, in tree species, due to their longer lifespan, this down-regulation of photosynthesis caused by stomatal conductance is not immediately evident at high [CO₂] (Curtis & Wang 1998; Gunderson & Wullschleger 1994; Medlyn et al. 2001). Persistent stimulation of photosynthesis in trees experiencing increased [CO₂] has been commonly reported (Way et al. 2015; Quentin et al. 2015; Gunderson & Wullschleger 1994), but only a few studies evaluated the photosynthetic responses of palm species to CO₂ enrichment (Ibrahim et al. 2010; Aranjuelo et al. 2009). Improved photosynthetic response, higher stomatal conductance, and greater light and water use efficiency by macauba palm indicated up-regulation of photosynthesis under long-term [CO₂]₇₀₀. This observation contradicts our hypothesis, which posited that long-term increment of [CO₂] would weaken the response of macauba palm to drought stress.

The up-regulation of macauba palm photosynthesis was also confirmed by the CO₂-response curves (A vs Ci) and the higher Vc _max and J _max in plants grown at [CO₂]₇₀₀. Gunderson & Wullschleger (1994) compiled a series of A vs Ci curves from tree species grown either at current CO₂ or high [CO₂] and estimated that Vc _max and J _max were somewhat lower in most plants grown at high [CO₂]; whereas photosynthesis in a few species was up-regulated, no palm species was evaluated. In contrast to macauba palm, which exhibits fast growth in a range of fertilization management, the slow-growing palm Chamaerops humilis exposed to long-term high [CO₂] exhibited lower Vc _max and J _max in comparison with plants exposed to current CO₂ (Aranjuelo et al. 2009). The lower photosynthetic capacity of this palm species under high [CO₂] was attributed to its inability to increase sink strength to balance the enhanced carbohydrate supply (Aranjuelo et al. 2009).

The higher W _t observed in macauba palm leaves at [CO₂]₇₀₀ is due to increased photosynthetic capacity of the plants. In contrast, higher W _t in several tree species under high [CO₂] has been commonly related to reduced stomatal conductance (Gessler et al. 2014; Werner et al. 2012). The increase in leaf photosynthesis simultaneously with W _t may stimulate biomass accumulation in palm species (Ibrahim et al. 2010). Moreover, under water stress conditions, the lower C _i/C _a that was detected only in plants grown at [CO₂]₇₀₀ indicates that stomatal pore shortening restricted CO₂ diffusion into the mesophyll, compromising carbon assimilation. In contrast, increased C _i/C _a ratio under severe water stress, as observed in plants grown at [CO₂]₄₀₀, confirms the absence of stomatal limitation to photosynthesis (Chaves & Oliveira 2004).

One of the first physiological processes affected by water stress is stomatal conductance (Cornic 2000). Stomatal conductance in palms has been shown to be sensitive to increasing leaf-to-air vapor pressure deficit (VPD), leading to greater stomatal closure, increased temperature and potential limitation of carbon gain (Renninger & Phillips 2016). In addition, stomatal sensitivity to VPD does not change in plants grown in high [CO₂] (Medlyn et al. 2001). Lower photosynthetic capacity under drought conditions has been reported for other palm species (Oliveira et al. 2002; Gomes et al. 2008; Suresh et al. 2010; Passos et al. 2009; Silva et al. 2017; Silvestre et al. 2017). However, unlike most palms, macauba palm is naturally found in environments characterized by seasonal drought and high temperatures (Pires et al. 2013) and therefore is able to adjust to, and recover from, water stress (Mota & Cano 2016). In several plant species exposed to harsher drought conditions, other processes not related to stomata are commonly impaired, such as Rubisco carboxylation activity, RuBP regeneration, ATP supply, and light use efficiency (Flexas & Medrano 2002; Lawlor 2002; Chaves & Oliveira 2004; Grassi & Magnani 2005). Thus, macauba palm plants under water stress, irrespective of CO₂ concentration, were able to maintain constant proline and chlorophyll contents and TBARS accumulation even after the slight reduction in VC _max. It is noteworthy that plants grown at [CO₂]₇₀₀ were more capable of recovering from drought due to higher VC _max and J _max (Fig. 3) and thus avoid reduction in total dry mass at the end of the stress period (Tab. 2).

In addition, the better response to drought by macauba palm plants grown in [CO₂]₇₀₀ was emphasized by the values of RWC and (_w measured throughout the successive water deficit cycles and by the lower photochemical capacity of plants at [CO₂]₄₀₀ and under water stress. The immediate change in RWC during the first water stress cycle was similar between water-stressed plants at both CO₂ concentrations; however, in the third water stress cycle, RWC increased slightly in plants grown at [CO₂]₇₀₀, but decreased significantly in plants grown at [CO₂]₄₀₀. The lower leaf water potential for plants grown at [CO₂]₇₀₀ in the first water stress cycle might be related to the accumulation of osmotically active solutes, such as sucrose derived from greater photosynthesis. Carbohydrate accumulation and sink imbalance is often associated with down-regulation of photosynthesis in plants under increased [CO₂] (Córdoba et al. 2017; Gamage et al. 2018), which has negative effects on electron transport capacity and photoinhibition (Pammenter et al. 1993; Adams et al. 2013). Nevertheless, it is remarkable that the long-term exposure of macauba palms to [CO₂]₇₀₀ resulted in higher φ_II and ETR and prevented photoinhibition of photosynthesis and damage due to oxidative stress under severe water deprivation, as assessed by TBARS values (Fig. S2 in supplementary material). The effective prevention of oxidative damage might be the result of enzymatic and non-enzymatic antioxidant mechanisms activated by water stress coupled with regulatory processes of energy partitioning that allow fast recovery of the photochemical capacity of macauba palm photosynthesis.

This capacity of macauba palms for fast recovery of photosynthesis after resuming watering is an important trait that indicates drought tolerance (Pinheiro & Chaves 2011) and contributes to higher productivity in a changing environment. Moreover, macauba palm plants presented efficient mechanisms to avoid metabolic damage upon water stress as indicated by stable values of lipid peroxidation and chlorophyll content. Oxidative damage and chlorophyll degradation under water stress may impair fast recovery by plants and lead to higher mortality as drought severity increases (Chaves et al. 2009). The complete recovery of photosynthesis after drought in macauba palm indicates that photochemical and biochemical traits were not severely affected by water stress (Cornic 2000). Accumulation of abscisic acid in leaves suppresses photosynthetic recovery through lowering stomatal conductance after drought, as observed for the dwarf coconut (Gomes et al. 2006) and the oil palm (Silva et al. 2017). Despite the low leaflet water potential (Ψ_w = -2 MPa) for macauba palms in the first water stress cycle, the time for complete recovery of plants was short. This suggests the presence of an efficient mechanism of stomatal control of photosynthesis that is coupled with prevention of severe damage under stress. This mechanism may allow efficient biomass allocation in future scenarios of climate change, as confirmed by our results regarding morphological adjustments and dry mass accumulation.

The stimuli to photosynthesis due to [CO₂]₇₀₀ resulted in more efficient biomass accumulation in water-stressed macauba palm plants. This response is not related to improved water uptake resulting from high biomass allocation in roots under water stress, which has been suggested as an adaptive strategy in some tree species (Khurana & Singh 2002). This is supported by the fact that the main morphological adjustments of macauba palms to CO₂ levels occurred in aboveground organs, as highlighted by the lower root-to-shoot ratio in plants at [CO₂]₇₀₀ (data not shown). The effects of water stress on biomass accumulation may be attenuated due to high [CO₂], as reported for plants from seasonally dry environments (Souza et al. 2016). The palm species Elaeis guineensis and Chamaerops humilis grown under increased [CO₂] had higher plant biomass, leaf area and relative growth rate than individuals under current CO₂ (Ibrahim et al. 2010; Aranjuelo et al. 2009). The greater leaf number and biomass allocation in the stem of macauba palm in response to the high [CO₂] might be linked to improved light capture by the whole plant (Chazdon 1986; Takenaka et al. 2001), which is coupled to higher light use efficiency (higher ETR and φ_II). Improved carbon assimilation may contribute to competition and establishment of this species in a changing environment.

Conclusion

Long-term exposure to [CO₂]₇₀₀ resulted in up-regulation of photosynthesis in macauba palm through some morphological and physiological adjustments including increased stomatal conductance, increased Rubisco carboxylation, increased light use efficiency, and increased above ground biomass production. The [CO₂]₇₀₀ changed the responses of macauba palms to cyclic drought. Macauba palm plants under conditions of [CO₂]₇₀₀ exhibited a faster recovery time after rehydration, maintained RWC during successive water stress cycles, and were able to prevent reduction of total dry mass. The effective responses of macauba palm to drought and [CO₂]₇₀₀ reveal that this plant has the potential to adjust to future climate change encompassing increased atmospheric CO₂.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais (FAPEMIG) (grant number APQ-01244-13 to EGP and APQ-00281-11 to JPS) and Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq) (grant number 470116/2013-7 to EGP). E. G. Pereira also thanks CNPq for a research productivity grant (311532/2017-9).

References

• Adams WW, Muller O, Cohu CM, Demmig-Adams B. 2013. May photoinhibition be a consequence, rather than a cause, of limited plant productivity? Photosynthesis Research 117: 31-44.
• Ågren GI, Kattge J. 2017. Nitrogen productivity and allocation responses of 12 important tree species to increased CO₂ Trees 31: 617-621.
• Ainsworth EA, Long SP. 2005. What have we learned from 15 years of free-air CO₂ enrichment (FACE)? A meta-analytic review of the responses of photosynthesis, canopy properties and plant production to rising CO₂ New Phytologist 165: 351-372.
• Ainsworth EA, Rogers A. 2007. The response of photosynthesis and stomatal conductance to rising [CO₂]: mechanisms and environmental interactions. Plant, Cell & Environment 30: 258-270.
• Ainsworth EA, Rogers A, Nelson R, Long SP. 2004. Testing the “source-sink” hypothesis of down-regulation of photosynthesis in elevated [CO₂] in the field with single gene substitutions in Glycine max Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 122: 85-94.
• Aranjuelo I, Pardo A, Biel C, Savé R, Azcón-Bieto J, Nogués S. 2009. Leaf carbon management in slow-growing plants exposed to elevated CO₂ Global Change Biology 15: 97-109.
• Bates LS, Waldren RP, Teare ID. 1973. Rapid determination of free proline for water-stress studies. Plant and Soil 39: 205-207.
• Bicalho EM, Rosa BL, Souza AE, Rios CO, Pereira EG. 2016. Do the structures of macaw palm fruit protect seeds in a fire-prone environment? Acta Botanica Brasilica 30: 540-548.
• Bjorholm S, Svenning J-C, Skov F, Balslev H. 2005. Environmental and spatial controls of palm (Arecaceae) species richness across the Americas. Global Ecology and Biogeography 14: 423-429.
• Chaves M, Flexas J, Pinheiro C. 2009. Photosynthesis under drought and salt stress: regulation mechanisms from whole plant to cell. Annals of Botany 103: 551-560.
• Chaves M, Oliveira M. 2004. Mechanisms underlying plant resilience to water deficits: prospects for water-saving agriculture. Journal of Experimental Botany 55: 2365-2384.
• Chazdon RL. 1986. The costs of leaf support in understory palms: economy versus safety. The American Naturalist 127: 9-30.
• Córdoba J, Pérez P, Morcuende R, Molina-Cano JL, Martinez-Carrasco R. 2017. Acclimation to elevated CO₂ is improved by low Rubisco and carbohydrate content, and enhanced Rubisco transcripts in the G132 barley mutant. Environmental and Experimental Botany 137: 36-48.
• Cornic G. 2000. Drought stress inhibits photosynthesis by decreasing stomatal aperture-not by affecting ATP synthesis. Trends in Plant Science 5: 187-188.
• Curtis PS, Wang X. 1998. A meta-analysis of elevated CO₂ effects on woody plant mass, form, and physiology. Oecologia 113: 299-313.
• Dias AN, Siqueira-Silva AI, Souza JP, Kuki KN, Pereira EG. 2018. Acclimation responses of macaw palm seedlings to contrasting light environments. Scientific Reports 8: doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-33553-1.
  » https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-33553-1
• Du Z, Bramlage WJ. 1992. Modified thiobarbituric acid assay for measuring lipid oxidation in sugar-rich plant tissue extracts. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 40: 1566-1570.
• Dusenge ME, Duarte AG, Way DA. 2019. Plant carbon metabolism and climate change: elevated CO₂ and temperature impacts on photosynthesis, photorespiration and respiration. New Phytologist 221: 32-49.
• Eiserhardt WL, Svenning J-C, Kissling WD, Balslev H. 2011. Geographical ecology of the palms (Arecaceae): determinants of diversity and distributions across spatial scales. Annals of Botany 108: 1391-1416.
• Esquivel-Muelbert A, Galbraith D, Dexter KG, et al 2017. Biogeographic distributions of neotropical trees reflect their directly measured drought tolerances. Scientific Reports 7: 8334 . doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-08105-8
  » https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-08105-8
• Flexas J, Medrano H. 2002. Drought‐inhibition of photosynthesis in C3 plants: stomatal and non‐stomatal limitations revisited. Annals of Botany 89: 183-189.
• Gamage D, Thompson M, Sutherland M, Hirotsu N, Makino A, Seneweera S. 2018. New insights into the cellular mechanisms of plant growth at elevated atmospheric carbon dioxide concentrations. Plant, Cell & Environment 41: 1233-1246.
• Genty B, Briantais JM, Baker NR. 1989. The relationship between the quantum yield of photosynthetic electron transport and quenching of chlorophyll fluorescence. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 990: 87-92.
• Gessler A, Ferrio JP, Hommel R, Treydte K, Werner RA, Monson RK. 2014. Stable isotopes in tree rings: towards a mechanistic understanding of isotope fractionation and mixing processes from the leaves to the wood. Tree Physiology 34: 796-818.
• Gomes FP, Oliva MA, Mielke M, Almeida AF, Leite H. 2006. Photosynthetic irradiance-response in leaves of dwarf coconut palm (Cocos nucifera L.‘nana’, Arecaceae): comparison of three models. Scientia Horticulturae 109: 101-105.
• Gomes FP, Oliva MA, Mielke MS, Almeida AAF, Leite HG, Aquino LA. 2008. Photosynthetic limitations in leaves of young Brazilian Green Dwarf coconut (Cocos nucifera L.‘nana’) palm under well-watered conditions or recovering from drought stress. Environmental and Experimental Botany 62: 195-204.
• Grassi G, Magnani F. 2005. Stomatal, mesophyll conductance and biochemical limitations to photosynthesis as affected by drought and leaf ontogeny in ash and oak trees. Plant, Cell & Environment 28: 834-849.
• Gunderson CA, Wullschleger SD. 1994. Photosynthetic acclimation in trees to rising atmospheric CO₂: A broader perspective. Photosynthesis Research 39: 369-388.
• Ibrahim MH, Jaafar HZE, Harun MH, Yusop MR. 2010. Changes in growth and photosynthetic patterns of oil palm (Elaeis guineensis Jacq.) seedlings exposed to short-term CO₂ enrichment in a closed top chamber. Acta Physiologiae Plantarum 32: 305-313.
• Khurana E, Singh JS. 2002. Ecology of seed and seedling growth for conservation and restoration of tropical dry forest: a review. Environmental Conservation 28: 39-52.
• Lawlor DW. 2002. Limitation to photosynthesis in water‐stressed leaves: stomata vs. metabolism and the role of ATP. Annals of Botany 89: 871-885.
• Leakey ADB, Ainsworth EA, Bernacchi CJ, Rogers A, Long SP, Ort DR. 2009. Elevated CO₂ effects on plant carbon, nitrogen, and water relations: six important lessons from FACE. Journal of Experimental Botany 60: 2859-2876.
• Long SP, Ainsworth EA, Rogers A, Ort DR. 2004. Rising atmospheric carbon dioxide: plants FACE the Future. Annual Review of Plant Biology 55: 591-628.
• Medeiros MJ, Oliveira DS, Oliveira MT, Willadino L, Houllou L, Santos MG. 2015. Ecophysiological, anatomical and biochemical aspects of in vitro culture of zygotic Syagrus coronata embryos and of young plants under drought stress. Trees 29: 1219-1233.
• Medlyn BE, Barton CVM, Broadmeadow MSJ, et al 2001. Stomatal conductance of forest species after long-term exposure to elevated CO₂ concentration: a synthesis. New Phytologist 149: 247-264.
• Melis A, Spangfort M, Andersson B. 1987. Light-absorption and electron-transport balance between photosystem II and photosystem I in spinach chloroplasts. Photochemistry and Photobiology 45: 129-136.
• Mota CS, Cano MAO. 2016. Matter accumulation and photosynthetic responses of macaw palm to cyclical drought. Revista Caatinga 29: 850-858.
• Motta Pd, Curi N, Oliveira-Filho Ad, Gomes JBV. 2002. Ocorrência da macaúba em Minas Gerais: relação com atributos climáticos, pedológicos e vegetacionais. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira 37: 1023-1031.
• Oliveira D, Medeiros M, Pereira S, et al 2016. Ecophysiological leaf traits of native and exotic palm tree species under semi-arid conditions. Bragantia 75: 128-134.
• Oliveira MAJ, Bovi MLA, Machado EC, Gomes MMA, Habermann G, Rodrigues JD. 2002. Fotossíntese, condutância estomática e transpiração em pupunheira sob deficiência hídrica. Scientia Agricola 59: 59-63.
• Pammenter NW, Loreto F, Sharkey TD. 1993. End product feedback effects on photosynthetic electron transport. Photosynthesis Research 35: 5-14.
• Passos E, Prado C, Aragao W. 2009. The influence of vapour pressure deficit on leaf water relations of Cocos nucifera in northeast Brazil. Experimental Agriculture 45: 93-106.
• Pinheiro C, Chaves M. 2011. Photosynthesis and drought: can we make metabolic connections from available data? Journal of Experimental Botany 62: 869-882.
• Pinto SS, Souza AE, Oliva MA, Pereira EG. 2016. Oxidative damage and photosynthetic impairment in tropical rice cultivars upon exposure to excess iron. Scientia Agricola 73: 217-226.
• Pires TP, Souza ES, Kuki KN, Motoike SY. 2013. Ecophysiological traits of the macaw palm: a contribution towards the domestication of a novel oil crop. Industrial Crops and Products 44: 200-210.
• Poorter H, Navas ML. 2003. Plant growth and competition at elevated CO₂: on winners, losers and functional groups. New Phytologist 157: 175-198.
• Quentin AG, Crous KY, Barton CVM, Ellsworth DS. 2015. Photosynthetic enhancement by elevated CO₂ depends on seasonal temperatures for warmed and non-warmed Eucalyptus globulus trees. Tree Physiology 35: 1249-1263.
• Ratter JA, Bridgewater S, Ribeiro JF. 2003. Analysis of the floristic composition of the Brazilian Cerrado vegetation III: comparison of the woody vegetation of 376 areas. Edinburgh Journal of Botany 60: 57-109.
• Renninger HJ, Phillips NG. 2016. Palm physiology and distribution in response to global environmental change. In: Goldstein G, Santiago LS. (eds.) Tropical tree physiology: adaptations and responses in a changing environment. Cham, Springer International Publishing. p. 67-101.
• Rossatto DR, Franco AC. 2017. Expanding our understanding of leaf functional syndromes in savanna systems: the role of plant growth form. Oecologia 183: 953-962.
• Safronov O, Kreuzwieser J, Haberer G, et al 2017. Detecting early signs of heat and drought stress in Phoenix dactylifera (date palm). PLOS ONE 12: e0177883. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0177883
  » https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0177883
• Sharkey TD, Bernacchi CJ, Farquhar GD, Singsaas EL. 2007. Fitting photosynthetic carbon dioxide response curves for C3 leaves. Plant, Cell & Environment 30: 1035-1040.
• Silva JB, Ferreira PA, Pereira EG, Costa LC, Miranda GV. 2012. Development of experimental structure and influence of high CO₂ concentration in maize crop. Engenharia Agricola 32: 306-314.
• Silva PA, Cosme VS, Rodrigues KCB, et al 2017. Drought tolerance in two oil palm hybrids as related to adjustments in carbon metabolism and vegetative growth. Acta Physiologiae Plantarum 39: 58. doi: 10.1007/s11738-017-2354-4
  » https://doi.org/10.1007/s11738-017-2354-4
• Silvestre WVD, Silva PA, Palheta LF, et al 2017. Differential tolerance to water deficit in two açaí (Euterpe oleracea Mart.) plant materials. Acta Physiologiae Plantarum 39: 4. doi: 10.1007/s11738-016-2301-9
  » https://doi.org/10.1007/s11738-016-2301-9
• Souza JP, Melo NMJ, Pereira EG, Halfeld AD, Gomes IN, Prado CHBA. 2016. Responses of woody Cerrado species to rising atmospheric CO₂ concentration and water stress: gains and losses. Functional Plant Biology 43: 1183-1193.
• Suresh K, Nagamani C, Ramachandrudu K, Mathur R. 2010. Gas-exchange characteristics, leaf water potential and chlorophyll a fluorescence in oil palm (Elaeis guineensis Jacq.) seedlings under water stress and recovery. Photosynthetica 48: 430-436.
• Takenaka A, Takahashi K, Kohyama T. 2001. Optimal leaf display and biomass partitioning for efficient light capture in an understorey palm, Licuala arbuscula Functional Ecology 15: 660-668.
• Walther GR, Gritti ES, Berger S, Hickler T, Tang Z, Sykes MT. 2007. Palms tracking climate change. Global Ecology and Biogeography 16: 801-809.
• Way DA, Oren RAM, Kroner Y. 2015. The space-time continuum: the effects of elevated CO₂ and temperature on trees and the importance of scaling. Plant, Cell & Environment 38: 991-1007.
• Werner C, Schnyder H, Cuntz M, et al 2012. Progress and challenges in using stable isotopes to trace plant carbon and water relations across scales. Biogeosciences 9: 3083-3111

Publication Dates

• Publication in this collection
  12 Sept 2019
• Date of issue
  Jul-Sep 2019

History

• Received
  18 Feb 2019
• Accepted
  13 May 2019