Acessibilidade / Reportar erro

Unveiled diversity: Amazonian Campinaranas harbor twice the number of bryophyte species recorded in the last century

ABSTRACT

Campinaranas are unique vegetation patches in the Amazonian biome, characterized by white-sand soils with relatively low nutrient content and subject to periodic flooding coupled with fluctuating groundwater levels. This study aimed to produce a synopsis of the bryophyte flora in Campinarana habitats by combining information from the literature with new collections made in the Uatumã Sustainable Development Reserve (Balbina, Central Amazonia), and areas of the middle Uaupés river (São Gabriel da Cachoeira, upper Rio Negro). One hundred and forty-three species were identified among mosses and liverworts, of which 68 are reported for the first time in Campinaranas. The species Frullania rio-janeirensis, Ceratolejeunea filaria, Diplasiolejeunea cobrensis and Bazzania diversicuspis are new records for the state of Amazonas. These results reveal high species richness for Campinaranas and indicate the need for continued study in this underexplored Amazonian habitat. This study emphasizes the importance of carrying out floristic inventories in poorly known environments and of further studies with different approaches, such as ecological, phytogeographic and genetic efforts.

Keywords:
Amazon; bryophytes; Campinarana; rainforest; tropics

Introduction

Despite appearing homogeneous, Amazonia houses a wide variety of habitats favoring a vast diversity of life forms (Pires & Prance 1985Pires JM, Prance GT. 1985. The vegetation types of the Brazilian Amazon. In: Prance GT, Lovejoy TE. (eds.) Key Environments: Amazonia. 1st. edn. Oxford, Pergamon Press. p. 109-145.) which is increasingly subject to contemporary threats (Ellwanger et al. 2020Ellwanger JH, Kulmann-Leal B, Kaminski VL, et al. 2020. Beyond diversity loss and climate change: Impacts of Amazon deforestation on infectious diseases and public health. Annals of the Brazilian Academy of Sciences 92: 1-33. ).

Campinaranas are unique vegetation patches in the Amazonian biome, characterized by white-sand soils with relatively low nutrient content subject to periodic flooding coupled with fluctuating groundwater levels (Reichardt et al. 1975Reichardt K, Santos A, Nascimento-Filho V, Bacc OOS. 1975. Movimento de água subterrânea em ecossistema campina amazônica. Acta Amazonica 6: 229-290.; Anderson 1981Anderson AB. 1981. White-sand vegetation of Brazilian Amazonia. Biotropica 13: 199-210.; Adeney et al. 2016Adeney JM, Christensen NL, Vicentini A, Cohn-Haft M. 2016. White-sand ecosystems in Amazonia. Biotropica 48: 7-23. ).

White-sand ecosystems (including Campinaranas) covers approximately 5 % of the Amazon (Anderson 1981Anderson AB. 1981. White-sand vegetation of Brazilian Amazonia. Biotropica 13: 199-210.; Adeney et al. 2016Adeney JM, Christensen NL, Vicentini A, Cohn-Haft M. 2016. White-sand ecosystems in Amazonia. Biotropica 48: 7-23. ). In Brazil, Campinaranas form vast areas on the upper Rio Negro and across the state of Roraima, but occur as fragmented patches or vegetation islands surrounded by Terra Firme forest in the Central and Lower Amazonia Anderson 1981Anderson AB. 1981. White-sand vegetation of Brazilian Amazonia. Biotropica 13: 199-210.; Adeney et al. 2016Adeney JM, Christensen NL, Vicentini A, Cohn-Haft M. 2016. White-sand ecosystems in Amazonia. Biotropica 48: 7-23. ).

Campinaranas, as opposed to Terra Firme forests, are composed by vegetation with a high degree of sclerophylly, low canopy and low productivity (Coomes & Grubb 1996Coomes DA, Grubb PJ. 1996 Amazonian caatinga and related communities at La Esmeralda, Venezuela: forest structure, physiognomy and floristics, and control by soil factors. Vegetatio 122: 167-191.). Their species composition and distribution patterns have been the focus of several recent ecological studies, particularly analyzing the woody component such as trees and shrubs (García-Villacorta et al. 2016García-Villacorta R, Dexter KG, Pennington T. 2016. Amazonian white-sand forests show strong floristic links with surrounding oligotrophic habitats and the Guiana Shield. Biotropica 48: 47-57. ; Guevara et al. 2016Guevara JE, Damasco G, Baraloto C, et al. 2016. Low phylogenetic beta diversity and geographic neo-endemism in Amazonian white-sand forests. Biotropica 48: 34-46. ), or vascular epiphytes, especially orchids (Braga 1978Braga PI. 1978. Estudos da flora orquidológica do Estado do Amazonas III - X Brassocattleya rubyi Braga (Orchidaceae) híbrido natural novo da flora amazônica. Acta Amazonica 8: 371-378.; Prance 1996Prance GT. 1996. Islands in Amazonia. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, series B 351: 823-833.; Klein & Piedade 2019Klein VP, Piedade MTF. 2019. Orchidaceae occurring in white-sand ecosystems of the Uatumã Sustainable Development Reserve in Central Amazon. Phytotaxa 419: 113-148. ). These studies support the idea that Campinaranas harbor a typical assemblage of species related to the peculiarities of these environments. When compared to other vegetation types, they are less diverse but show a relatively high number of endemic, i.e. restricted, species. However, bryophytes (avascular plants) have not received the same attention as the other groups, being registered in these environments only in a few specific studies.

The first survey of bryophytes in Amazonian Campinarana was conducted by Lisboa (1976Lisboa RCL. 1976. Estudos sobre a vegetação das campinas amazônicas V: Brioecologia de uma campina amazônica. Acta Amazonica 6: 171-191.) in an area of Campina (a term used as a synonym for Campinarana) located at the km 62 of the Manaus-Caracaraí road. This author considered the bryophytes, with 34 species, a well-represented group in comparison with the 45 species of woody plants reported by Anderson et al. (1975Anderson AB, Prance GT, Albuquerque BWP. 1975. Estudos sobre a vegetação das campinas amazônicas III: a vegetação lenhosa da Campina da Reserva Biológica INPA SUFRAMA (Manaus Caracaraí, km 62). Acta Amazonica 5: 225-246.) for the same area. Earlier references of bryophytes in Amazonian Campinarana included only the genus Sphagnum (Ducke 1922Ducke A. 1922. Plantes Nouvelles ou Peu connues de la Région Amazonienne. Archivos do Jardim Botânico do Rio de Janeiro 3: 3-269.; Ducke & Black 1954Ducke A, Black GA. 1954. Notas sobre a fitogeografia da Amazônia brasileira. Boletim Técnico Instituto Agronômico do Norte 29: 1-62.; Egler 1960Egler WA. 1960. Contribuição ao conhecimento dos campos da Amazônia. 1 - Os campos do Ariramba. Boletim do Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi, Série Botânica 4: 1-36.).

Griffin (1979Griffin D. 1979. Guia preliminar para as briófitas frequentes em Manaus e adjacências. Acta Amazonica 9: 1-67.) presented an annotated list of 147 bryophyte species collected in the greater Manaus region within a radius of 150 km of the capital of Amazonas State. Among the different vegetation types encompassed within his study area, Campinas harbored a bryophyte flora made up of 19 species with wide geographic distribution.

More recently, Sierra et al. (2018Sierra AM, Vanderpoorten A, Gradstein SR, Pereira MR, Bastos CJP, Zartman CE. 2018. Bryophytes of Jaú National Park (Amazonas, Brazil): Estimating species detectability and richness in a lowland Amazonian megareserve. The Bryologist 121: 571-588. ) presented a list of 150 species from different habitats in the Jaú National Park, Amazonas State, of which 34 occurred in Campinarana as well as other vegetation types, such as Terra Firme (upland) and Igapó forests (seasonally inundated blackwater forests).

Although commonly associated with preserved, humid and shaded places, bryophytes are also found in extreme environments such as deserts, pole regions and alpine elevations (Vittoz et al. 2010Vittoz P, Camenisch M, Mayor R, Miserere L, Vust M, Theurillat JP. 2010. Subalpine-nival gradient of species richness for vascular plants, bryophytes and lichens in the Swiss Inner Alps. Botanica Helvetica 120: 139-149. ; Bramley-Alves et al. 2014Bramley-Alves J, King DH, Robinson SA. 2014. Dominating the Antarctic environment: Bryophytes in a time of change. In: Hanson DT, Rice SK. (eds.) Photosynthesis in Bryophytes and early land plants. Advances in Photosynthesis and Respiration. Dordrecht, Springer. p. 309-324.; Smith & Stark 2014Smith RJ, Stark LR. 2014. Habitat vs. dispersal constraints on bryophyte diversity in the Mojave Desert, USA. Journal of Arid Environments 102: 76-81. ). Bryophytes are avascular plants composed of species assemblages sensitive to environmental gradients. It is therefore expected that bryophyte assemblages in Campinaranas should also show specific patterns when compared to those of the relatively well-known Terra Firme forest. However, there is a deep gap in the knowledge that prevents such analysis. Among the 576 species of bryophytes listed for the Amazonia in the records of the repository Flora do Brasil 2020 (BFG 2018BFG - The Brazil Flora Group. 2018. Brazilian Flora 2020: Innovation and collaboration to meet Target 1 of the Global Strategy for Plant Conservation (GSPC). Rodriguésia 69: 1513-1527. ), only 15 are reported to occur in Campinaranas. After almost half a century from the first inventories, the number of bryophytes species from Amazonian Campinaranas in BFG (2018)BFG - The Brazil Flora Group. 2018. Brazilian Flora 2020: Innovation and collaboration to meet Target 1 of the Global Strategy for Plant Conservation (GSPC). Rodriguésia 69: 1513-1527. is lower than the number of records provided by the literature, which highlights not only the need for more studies, but also the importance of a synthesis of the knowledge in this ecosystem type.

The fragmented nature of Campinaranas, the small area of their patches, and their susceptibility to anthropic disturbance place this vegetation type as one of the most threatened in the Amazonia (Silveira 2017Silveira M. 2017. O complexo vegetacional sobre areia branca no Alto Juruá. In: Brito TF, Silva RC, Oliveira SAV, Silveira M. (eds.) Complexo vegetacional sobre areia branca: Campinaranas do Sudoeste da Amazônia. Rio Branco, Editora da Universidade Federal do Acre - Edufac. p. 11-19.). The lack of connectivity between these small patches hinders the recovery of locally extinct species (Álvarez-Alonso et al. 2013Álvarez-Alonso J, Metz MR, Fine PVA. 2013. Habitat specialization by birds in Western Amazonian white-sand forests. Biotropica 45: 365-372. ). The increasing threat in Amazonia forest calls attention to the need to protect this fragile ecosystem (Adeney et al. 2016Adeney JM, Christensen NL, Vicentini A, Cohn-Haft M. 2016. White-sand ecosystems in Amazonia. Biotropica 48: 7-23. ).

Vascular plants depend on numerous factors for their establishment, but soil plays a predominant role. Bryophyte distribution, on the other hand, is mainly determined by niche and dispersal potential (Lönnel et al. 2012Lönnel N, Hylander K, Jonsson BG, Sundberg S. 2012. The fate of the missing spores-patterns of realized dispersal beyond the closest vicinity of a sporulating moss. PLOS ONE 7: e41987. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0041987.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.004...
; Mota-de-Oliveira & ter Steege 2015Mota-de-Oliveira S, ter Steege H. 2015. Bryophyte communities in the Amazon forest are regulated by height on the host tree and site elevation. Journal of Ecology, 103: 441-450. ; Barbé et al. 2016Barbé M, Chavel EE, Fenton NJ, et al. 2016. Dispersal of bryophytes and ferns is facilitated by small mammals in the boreal forest. Écoscience 23: 67-76. ; Garcia et al. 2020Garcia ET, Oliveira SM, Tavares-Martins ACC, Pôrto KC. 2020. Vertical gradient of epiphytic bryophytes in the Amazon: the rule and its exception. Cryptogamie, Bryologie 41: 55-65. ). Considering the richness recorded in the surrounding habitats, the low number of bryophyte species currently registered in Campinaranas is possibly a reflection of the lack of studies. In view of the bioindicator potential of these plants and the vulnerability of this type of ecosystem in Amazonia, assessing the bryophyte flora in these environments may contribute to the conservation of this biota.

The term Campinarana is associated with different phytophysiognomies called Campinarana Florestada (forested Campinarana), Campinarana Arborizada (wooded Campinarana), Campinarana Arbustiva (shrubby Campinarana) and Campinarana Gramíneo-lenhosa (grassy-woody Campinarana or Campina) (IBGE 2012IBGE - Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística. 2012. Manual técnico da vegetação brasileira. 2nd. edn. Rio de Janeiro, Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística - IBGE. ).

This study aimed to produce a synopsis of the bryophyte flora in Campinaranas, merging information from the literature and new collections in the Uatumã Sustainable Development Reserve (Balbina, Central Amazonia) and the vicinity of the Uaupés river (São Gabriel da Cachoeira, Upper Rio Negro).

Materials and methods

Literature review

The species list was based on previously published checklists, floristic inventories, ecological studies and taxonomic monographs in Amazonia, from which the information specifically related to species occurring in Campinaranas was filtered (Spruce 1884Spruce R. 1884. Hepaticae Amazonicae et Andiane. Transactions and Proceedings of Society of Edinburgh 15: 1-308.; Griffin 1975Griffin D. 1975. The Bryology of a Brazilian campina forest. The Association of Southeastern Biologists Bulletin 22: 1-55.; Lisboa 1976Lisboa RCL. 1976. Estudos sobre a vegetação das campinas amazônicas V: Brioecologia de uma campina amazônica. Acta Amazonica 6: 171-191.; Reese 1993Reese WD. 1993. Calymperaceae. Flora Neotropica Monograph 58: 1-102.; Gradstein 1994Gradstein SR. 1994. Lejeuneaceae: Ptychantheae, Brachiolejeuneae. Flora Neotropica Monograph 62: 1-216.; Gradstein & Costa 2003Gradstein SR, Costa DP. 2003. The Hepaticae and Anthocerotae of Brazil. Memoirs of The New York Botanical Garden 88: 1-673.; Sierra et al. 2018Sierra AM, Vanderpoorten A, Gradstein SR, Pereira MR, Bastos CJP, Zartman CE. 2018. Bryophytes of Jaú National Park (Amazonas, Brazil): Estimating species detectability and richness in a lowland Amazonian megareserve. The Bryologist 121: 571-588. ; Pereira 2019Pereira MRS. 2019. Avanços florísticos e filogênicos de Calymperaceae Kindb. (Bryophyta) para Amazônia. PhD Thesis, Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia, Manaus.). Species specifically occurring in Campinaranas cited in BFG (2018)BFG - The Brazil Flora Group. 2018. Brazilian Flora 2020: Innovation and collaboration to meet Target 1 of the Global Strategy for Plant Conservation (GSPC). Rodriguésia 69: 1513-1527. were also included.

Sampling area

Collections were carried out in two areas: the Uatumã Sustainable Development Reserve (USDR hereafter) and in the vicinity of the Uaupés river in São Gabriel da Cachoeira (SGC hereafter). Both areas are located in the state of Amazonas (Fig. 1).

Figure 1
Map of the two study areas. A. Location of the two study areas in the Amazonas State and identification of Campinarana; B. Collection points along of the Uaupés river, municipality of São Gabriel da Cachoeira; C. Collection points in the Uatumã Sustainable Development Reserve, municipality of São Sebastião do Uatumã.

The USDR is located in the municipalities of Itapiranga and São Sebastião do Uatumã, Central Amazonia, comprising an area of 4,244 km2 along the Uatumã river basin. The reserve harbors four types of forests: Terra Firme, Várzea and Igapó, and Campinarana (Koury et al. 2012Koury CG, Rizzo E, Albuja MG. 2012. O turismo na Reserva de Desenvolvimento Sustentável do Uatumã: conjuntura atual e possibilidades de geração de renda para as comunidades locais. Manaus, Conservação e Desenvolvimento Sustentável - IDESAM.). Collections were made in areas of Campinarana Arbustiva, in which herbs and shrubs predominate distributed among low trees up to 7 m tall and a clean and sometimes open understory; Campinarana Arborizada, which is a non-forested formation but with some trees that reach 12 m; and Campinarana Florestada with trees over 20 m high and an understory with the presence of palm trees (Fig. 2). The study area in SGC comprised trails along the Uaupés river, covering approximately 191.1 km of Campinarana Florestada.

Figure 2
Field images of the collection areas in different physiognomies of Campinarana in the Amazonia. Campinarana arbustiva in aerial (A) and understory (B and C) view. Campinarana arborizada seen from the understory (D and E) and general (F) view. Campinarana florestada in general view (G). Photos: Antônio Huxley Melo do Nascimento (A) and Charles E. Zartman (B-G).

Bryophyte collections

In the USDR, collections were performed in the vertical and horizontal gradient of the forest, covering a distance of approximately 2.18 km, including all Campinaranas.

In the vicinity of the Uaupés river in SGC, collections were made along trails in an opportunistic manner, including only the understory and maximizing the number of species sampled. Although canopy samples were not included, bryophytes growing on recently fallen branches were collected.

In the two study areas, all available substrates were explored, namely, living tree trunks, logs, rocks, soil and leaves (Fig. 3). The collection followed the techniques described by Yano (1984Yano O. 1984. Briófitas. In: Fidalgo O, Bononi VLR. (eds.) Técnicas de coleta, preservação e herborização de material botânico. São Paulo, Instituto de Botânica.) and the specimens were sun dried.

Figure 3
Substrates colonized by bryophytes in the study area. A. Soil in Campinarana arbustiva; B. Termite mound; C. Tree trunk; D. Tree branch; E. Living leaf; F. Understory of a Campinarana arbustiva; G. Tree climber collecting samples in the canopy in a Campinarana florestada. All photos by Charles E. Zartman.

Identification and classification

The identification was based on specialized literature (Yano 1992Yano O. 1992. Leucobryaceae (Bryopsida) do Brasil. PhD Thesis, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo.; Ireland & Buck 1994Ireland RR, Buck WR. 1994. Stereophyllaceae. Flora Neotropica Monograph 65: 1-49.; He 1999He XL. 1999. A taxonomic monograph of the genus Pycnolejeunea (Lejeuneaceae, Hepaticae). Acta Botanica Fennica 163: 1-77.; Ilkiu-Borges 2006Ilkiu-Borges AL .2006. A taxonomic monograph of the genus Prionolejeunea (Lejeuneaceae Jungermanniopsida). Göttingen, Cuvillier Verlag.; Gradstein et al. 2001Gradstein SR, Churchill SP, Salazar-Allen N. 2001. Guide to the bryophytes of tropical America. Memoirs of The New York Botanical Garden 86: 1-577.; Buck 2003Buck WR. 2003. Guide to the Plants of Central French Guiana - Part 3. Mosses. Memoirs of The New York Botanical Garden 76: 26-123.; Dauphin 2003Dauphin G. 2003. Ceratolejeunea (Lejeuneaceae: Lejeuneoideae). Flora Neotropica Monograph 90: 1-86.; Gradstein & Costa 2003Gradstein SR, Costa DP. 2003. The Hepaticae and Anthocerotae of Brazil. Memoirs of The New York Botanical Garden 88: 1-673.; Ilkiu-Borges & Lisboa 2004Ilkiu-Borges AL, Lisboa RCL. 2004. Os gêneros Cyclolejeunea, Haplolejeunea, Harpalejeunea, Lepidolejeunea e Rectolejeunea (Lejeuneaceae, Hepaticae) na Estação Científica Ferreira Penna, Pará, Brasil. Acta Botanica Brasilica 18: 539-555.; Gradstein & Ilkiu-Borges 2009Gradstein SR, Ilkiu-Borges AL. 2009. Guide to the plants of Central French Guiana. Part 4. Liverworts and hornworts. Memoirs of The New York Botanical Garden 76: 1-140., 2015Gradstein SR, Ilkiu-Borges AL. 2015. A taxonomic revision of the genus Odontoschisma (Marchantiophyta: Cephaloziaceae). Nova Hedwigia 100: 15-100. ; Bastos 2012Bastos CJP. 2012. Taxonomia e distribuição de Cheilolejeunea aneogyna (Spruce) A. Evans (Lejeuneaceae, Marchnatiophyta). Acta Botanica Brasilica 26: 709-713. ; Pócs et al. 2014Pócs T, Bernecker A, Tixier P. 2014. Synopsis and key to species of Neotropical Cololeijeunea (Lejeuneaceae). Acta Botanica Hungarica 56: 185-226. ; Shi & Zhu 2015Shi XQ, Zhu RL. 2015. A revision of Archilejeunea s.str. (Lejeuneaceae, Marchantiophyta). Nova Hedwigia 100: 589-601. ; Bastos et al. 2016Bastos CJP, Sierra AM, Zartman CE. 2016. Three new species of Cheilolejeunea (Spruce) Steph. (Marchantiophyta, Lejeuneaceae) from northern Brazil. Phytotaxa 277: 36-46. ; Gradstein 2016Gradstein SR. 2016. The genus Plagiochila (Marchantiophyta) in Colombia. Revista de La Academia Colombiana de Ciencias Exactas, Físicas y Naturales 40: 104-136. ; 2017Gradstein SR. 2017. Bazzania (Marchantiophyta) in South America. Nova Hedwigia 105: 1-24. ; Bastos & Zartman 2017Bastos CJP, Zartman CE. 2017. A new species of Pycnolejeunea (Marchantiophyta, Lejeuneaceae) from Brazil. Neodiversity 10: 1-6. ; Lima et al. 2018Lima E, Oliveira-da-Silva FR, Ilkiu-Borges AL. 2018. Flora das cangas da Serra dos Carajás, Pará, Brasil: Frullaniaceae. Rodriguésia 69: 973-981. ; Oliveira-da-Silva & Ilkiu-Borges 2018Oliveira-da-Silva FR, Ilkiu-Borges AL. 2018. Briófitas (Bryophyta e Marchantiophyta) das cangas da Serra dos Carajás, Pará, Brasil. Rodriguésia 69: 1405-1416. ; Bastos & Gradstein 2020Bastos CJP, Gradstein SR. 2020. The genus Cheilolejeunea (Marchantiophyta: Lejeuneaceae) in tropical America. Nova Hedwigia 111: 287-335.) and/or on the analysis by specialists. The classification system adopted was the one of Crandall-Stotler et al. (2009Crandall-Stotler B, Stotler R, Long D. 2009. Morphology and classification of the Marchantiophyta. In: Goffinet B, Shaw AJ. Bryophyte Biology. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. p. 1-54.) for Marchantiophyta and Goffinet et al. (2009Goffinet B, Buck WR, Shaw JA. 2009. Morphology, anatomy, and classification of the Bryophyta. In: Goffinet B, Shaw AJ. (eds.) Bryophyte Biology . Cambridge, Cambridge University Press . p. 55-138.) for Bryophyta, with updates by Carvalho-Silva et al. (2017Carvalho-Silva M, Stech M, Soares-Silva LH, et al. 2017. A molecular phylogeny of the Sematophyllaceae sl (Hypnales) based on plastid, mitochondrial and nuclear markers, and its taxonomic implications. Taxon 66: 811-831. ) for Sematophyllaceae and Shi et al. (2015)Shi XQ, Gradstein SR, Zhu RL. 2015. Type studies on Archilejeunea (Lejeuneaceae, Marchantiophyta): Five new synonyms and a new combination. Phytotaxa 195: 248-250. doi: 10.11646/phytotaxa.195.3.5.
https://doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.195.3...
for the genus Dibrachiella.

The specimens were classified according to the substrate from which they were collected: corticolous - on barks of living trees; epixylous - on decaying wood; epiphyllous - on leaves; saxicolous - on rocks; and terricolous - on soil (Robbins 1952Robbins RG. 1952. Bryophyta Ecology of a dune area in New Zealand vegetation. Acta Geobotânica 4: 1-131.). As for the world distribution patterns, the species were classified as Pantropical, Neotropical, Afro-american, Amazonia, Amazonia-Guianas, Endemic in Brazil, Holartic regions, Madagascar, S Europe, SW Asia, Tropical South-American, and Trinidad (Fulford 1966Fulford MH. 1966. Manual of the leafy Hepaticae of Latin America. Memoirs of The New York Botanical Garden 11: 173-276.; Reese 1993Reese WD. 1993. Calymperaceae. Flora Neotropica Monograph 58: 1-102.; Gradstein & Costa 2003Gradstein SR, Costa DP. 2003. The Hepaticae and Anthocerotae of Brazil. Memoirs of The New York Botanical Garden 88: 1-673.; Santos & Costa 2010Santos ND, Costa DP. 2010. Phytogeography of the liverwort flora of the Atlantic Forest of southeastern Brazil. Journal of Bryology 32: 9-22. ; Gradstein & Uribe 2011Gradstein SR, Uribe J. 2011. A synopsis of the Frullaniaceae (Marchantiophyta) from Colombia. Caldasia 33: 367-396.; Santos et al. 2011Santos ND, Costa DP, Kinoshita LS, Shepherd GJ. 2011. Aspectos brioflorísticos e fitogeográficos de duas formações costeiras de Floresta Atlântica da Serra do Mar, Ubatuba/ SP, Brasil. Biota Neotropica 11: 425-438. ; Gradstein 2013Gradstein SR. 2013. Afro-Amerian Hepatics revisited. Polish Botanical Journal 58: 149 -177.; Heirinchs et al. 2015; Carmo & Peralta 2016Carmo DM, Peralta DF. 2016. Survey of bryophytes in Serra da Canastra National Park, Minas Gerais, Brazil. Acta Botanica Brasilica 30: 254-265. ; Pócs 2016Pócs T. 2016. Contribution to the bryoflora of Australia. VI. The genus Cololejeunea (Spruce) Steph. (Lejeuneaceae, Marchantiophyta). Polish Botanical Journal 61: 205-229. ; Gradstein 2017Gradstein SR. 2017. Bazzania (Marchantiophyta) in South America. Nova Hedwigia 105: 1-24. ; BFG 2018BFG - The Brazil Flora Group. 2018. Brazilian Flora 2020: Innovation and collaboration to meet Target 1 of the Global Strategy for Plant Conservation (GSPC). Rodriguésia 69: 1513-1527. ; Pereira 2019Pereira MRS. 2019. Avanços florísticos e filogênicos de Calymperaceae Kindb. (Bryophyta) para Amazônia. PhD Thesis, Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia, Manaus.).

Exsiccates will be deposited in the INPA herbarium from the Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia.

Results and discussion

Collections from the USDR, margins of the Uaupés river in SGC, and different Amazonian Campinaranas reported by Lisboa (1976Lisboa RCL. 1976. Estudos sobre a vegetação das campinas amazônicas V: Brioecologia de uma campina amazônica. Acta Amazonica 6: 171-191.), Griffin (1979Griffin D. 1979. Guia preliminar para as briófitas frequentes em Manaus e adjacências. Acta Amazonica 9: 1-67.), Sierra et al. (2018Sierra AM, Vanderpoorten A, Gradstein SR, Pereira MR, Bastos CJP, Zartman CE. 2018. Bryophytes of Jaú National Park (Amazonas, Brazil): Estimating species detectability and richness in a lowland Amazonian megareserve. The Bryologist 121: 571-588. ) and BFG (2018)BFG - The Brazil Flora Group. 2018. Brazilian Flora 2020: Innovation and collaboration to meet Target 1 of the Global Strategy for Plant Conservation (GSPC). Rodriguésia 69: 1513-1527. resulted in a list of 143 species, of which 68 % are liverworts (97 spp., 42 genera, 10 families) and 32 % mosses (46 spp., 24 genera, 13 families) (Tab. 1).

Table 1
List of bryophyte species in the Amazonian Campinarana, with an indication of world distribution, Brazilian phytogeographic domains, substrates, voucher of the collections, and references consulted. AM: Amazonia. CA: Caatinga. CE: Cerrado. AF: Atlantic Forest. PA: Pampa. PN: Pantanal. C: Corticolous. Ep: Epiphyllous. Ex: Epixylic. S: Saxicolous. T: Terricolous. USDR: Uatumã Sustainable Development Reserve. SGC: São Gabriel da Cachoeira. *New occurrence for the state of Amazonas. ** First record in Campinarana in Central Amazonia.

A total of 116 species were identified in the 1273 specimens collected in Campinaranas of the USDR and SGC, and 68 of them are reported for the first time in this vegetation. Frullania rio-janeirensis, Ceratolejeunea filaria, Diplasiolejeunea cobrensis and Bazzania diversicuspis are new records for the state of Amazonas. These results reveal a high richness of species in Campinaranas and indicate the need for systematized sampling effort in this yet unexplored ecosystem.

Of the total of 143 species found in Campinaranas, 46 were recorded during the new collections and in the literature, whereas 20 are found in literature records only. Six species were solely reported by Lisboa (1976Lisboa RCL. 1976. Estudos sobre a vegetação das campinas amazônicas V: Brioecologia de uma campina amazônica. Acta Amazonica 6: 171-191.), seven by Griffin (1979Griffin D. 1979. Guia preliminar para as briófitas frequentes em Manaus e adjacências. Acta Amazonica 9: 1-67.), six by Sierra et al. (2018Sierra AM, Vanderpoorten A, Gradstein SR, Pereira MR, Bastos CJP, Zartman CE. 2018. Bryophytes of Jaú National Park (Amazonas, Brazil): Estimating species detectability and richness in a lowland Amazonian megareserve. The Bryologist 121: 571-588. ) and eight were exclusive to the list of BFG (2018)BFG - The Brazil Flora Group. 2018. Brazilian Flora 2020: Innovation and collaboration to meet Target 1 of the Global Strategy for Plant Conservation (GSPC). Rodriguésia 69: 1513-1527. . Some species were taxonomically updated, such as Cheilolejeunea clausa (cited as Eusmolejeunea suaveolens Spruce in Lisboa 1976), Frullania kunzei and Frullania intumescens (cited as Frullania neesi Lindb. and Frullania montagnei Gottsche in Griffin 1979, respectively).

In relation to the species registered in BFG (2018)BFG - The Brazil Flora Group. 2018. Brazilian Flora 2020: Innovation and collaboration to meet Target 1 of the Global Strategy for Plant Conservation (GSPC). Rodriguésia 69: 1513-1527. for Amazonian Campinaranas (15 spp.), our list represents an addition of 128 species. In comparison with the current number of species registered by BFG (2018)BFG - The Brazil Flora Group. 2018. Brazilian Flora 2020: Innovation and collaboration to meet Target 1 of the Global Strategy for Plant Conservation (GSPC). Rodriguésia 69: 1513-1527. for Terra Firme forest, the most investigated Amazonian vegetation type, Campinaranas harbor ca. 32 % of the total richness of this environment. An early study on bryophytes in different Amazonian vegetation types in Colombia already indicated that species richness in white sand forests was not much lower than in other environments (Benavides et al. 2006Benavides JC, Duque A, Duivenvoorden JF, Cleef AM. 2006. Species richness and distribution of understory bryophytes in different forest types in Colombia Amazonia. Journal of Bryology 28: 182-189.). Using comparable sampling effort, the authors registered 32 species in the white-sand areas and 45 species in terra firme forests. According to Adeney et al. (2016Adeney JM, Christensen NL, Vicentini A, Cohn-Haft M. 2016. White-sand ecosystems in Amazonia. Biotropica 48: 7-23. ), Campinaranas patches are usually overlooked because they are embedded in Terra Firme forests and therefore hardly detected in satellite images. Consequently, the number of species that occur in this vegetation type across the Amazon is also likely to be underestimated, especially of plant groups such as bryophytes.

Our results showed Lejeuneaceae as the most species rich family (64 spp.), followed by Calymperaceae (20 spp.), Lepidoziaceae (14 spp.), Sematophyllaceae (6 spp.) and Frullaniaceae (7 spp.) (Fig. 4). Lejeuneaceae is among the largest liverwort families and has a wide distribution, with a range of occurrence from rainforests to open formations, from lowlands to mountain ecosystems (Gradstein 1994Gradstein SR. 1994. Lejeuneaceae: Ptychantheae, Brachiolejeuneae. Flora Neotropica Monograph 62: 1-216.; Gradstein et al. 2001Gradstein SR, Churchill SP, Salazar-Allen N. 2001. Guide to the bryophytes of tropical America. Memoirs of The New York Botanical Garden 86: 1-577.; Carmo & Peralta 2016Carmo DM, Peralta DF. 2016. Survey of bryophytes in Serra da Canastra National Park, Minas Gerais, Brazil. Acta Botanica Brasilica 30: 254-265. ; Oliveira-da-Silva & Ilkiu-Borges 2018Oliveira-da-Silva FR, Ilkiu-Borges AL. 2018. Briófitas (Bryophyta e Marchantiophyta) das cangas da Serra dos Carajás, Pará, Brasil. Rodriguésia 69: 1405-1416. ). Lepidoziaceae is also a widely worldwide distributed family and in Brazil has been reported in the majority of the phytogeographic domains (Amazonia, Caatinga, Cerrado and Atlantic Forest) (Gradstein & Costa 2003Gradstein SR, Costa DP. 2003. The Hepaticae and Anthocerotae of Brazil. Memoirs of The New York Botanical Garden 88: 1-673.; BFG 2018BFG - The Brazil Flora Group. 2018. Brazilian Flora 2020: Innovation and collaboration to meet Target 1 of the Global Strategy for Plant Conservation (GSPC). Rodriguésia 69: 1513-1527. ). In turn, Frullaniaceae is a well-represented family in open vegetation types such as restinga, savanna, as well as in the understory and canopy of dense forest (Gradstein & Costa 2003Gradstein SR, Costa DP. 2003. The Hepaticae and Anthocerotae of Brazil. Memoirs of The New York Botanical Garden 88: 1-673.). These liverwort families were expected to occur in our study in view of the many types of Campinarana present in the USDR, varying from a grassy-woody Campinaranas with high luminosity and open understory to shaded forested Campinaranas with a species-rich understory and greater variety of substrates, including living leaves and decaying branches.

Figure 4
Species richness of bryophyte families in Amazonian Campinaranas.

Among acrocarpous mosses, Calymperaceae was the most representative family with 20 species and Syrrhopodon Schwägr. was the genus with the largest number of species (10 spp.). The same result was recorded by PHM Sobreira (2018 unpubl. res.), who investigated the richness and composition of bryophyte and fern species in Campinarana and Terra Firme forest from two sites in Central Amazonia. Calymperaceae has high ecological and taxonomic importance in the Neotropics. More than half of its species reported to the Neotropics occur in the Brazilian Amazonia, where it is well represented in many of its ecosystems, including Campinaranas (Lisboa 1976Lisboa RCL. 1976. Estudos sobre a vegetação das campinas amazônicas V: Brioecologia de uma campina amazônica. Acta Amazonica 6: 171-191.; Gradstein et al. 2001Gradstein SR, Churchill SP, Salazar-Allen N. 2001. Guide to the bryophytes of tropical America. Memoirs of The New York Botanical Garden 86: 1-577.; Pereira 2019Pereira MRS. 2019. Avanços florísticos e filogênicos de Calymperaceae Kindb. (Bryophyta) para Amazônia. PhD Thesis, Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia, Manaus.). This family has a high rate of endemism and successfully colonizes different habitats, which is reflected on its high morphological variation (Reese 1993Reese WD. 1993. Calymperaceae. Flora Neotropica Monograph 58: 1-102.; Pereira 2019Pereira MRS. 2019. Avanços florísticos e filogênicos de Calymperaceae Kindb. (Bryophyta) para Amazônia. PhD Thesis, Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia, Manaus.).

Corticolous bryophytes predominated in Amazonian Campinaranas. In this study, 116 were found on living tree trunks, 28 on decaying trunks, 18 on living leaves, 28 on rocks, and 26 on soil (Fig. 5). Some species were collected on more than one type of substrate, such as Calypogeia tenax, found growing on both decaying logs in SGC and rocks in the Jaú National Park (Sierra et al. 2018Sierra AM, Vanderpoorten A, Gradstein SR, Pereira MR, Bastos CJP, Zartman CE. 2018. Bryophytes of Jaú National Park (Amazonas, Brazil): Estimating species detectability and richness in a lowland Amazonian megareserve. The Bryologist 121: 571-588. ), and Ceratolejeunea coarina collected on both living trunks and living leaves in the USDR. The high colonization of living trunks by bryophytes can be explained by the great availability of this substrate in tropical forests (Richards 1984Richards WP. 1984. The ecology of tropical forest bryophytes. In: Schuster RM. (ed.) New Manual of Bryology. Japan, Hattori Botanical Laboratory. p. 1233-1270.). Favored by high humidity of tropical environments, this substrate provides ideal microclimatic conditions for the development of bryophytes (Frahm 2003Frahm JP. 2003. Manual of tropical bryology. Tropical Bryology 23: 1-196.).

Figure 5
Distribution of species according to the substrates that they were collected in Amazonian Campinaranas.

The bryophytes listed in this study present predominantly Neotropical distribution pattern (70 spp.), but also South American (13 spp.), Pantropical (15 spp.), Amazonian (14 spp.), Endemic to Brazil (03 spp.), Afroamerican (11 spp.), distribution in Amazonian-Guyanas (6 spp.), Tropical South American (5 spp.), Amazonian (+ Bahia) (2 spp.), and Amazonian (+ Costa Rica), S Europe, SW Asia and Trinidad (one species each).

Twenty-nine species are in Brazil exclusive to the Amazonian domain. Among them, the species Calypogeia tenax, Mnioloma caespitosa, Archilejeunea ludoviciana, Cheilolejeunea asperifolia, C. fragrantíssima, C. neblinensis, C. papulosa, Diplasiolejeunea buckii, Drepanolejeunea polyrhiza, Pycnolejeunea remotistipula, Verdoornianthus marsupiifolius, Micropterygium parvistipulum, Pteropsiella frondiformis, Telaranea pecten, Calymperes bartramii, Octoblepharum stramineum, Syrrhopodon annotinus, S. fimbriatus and S. flexifolius were thus far known from Terra Firme forest only, and had, therefore, their range of distribution extended to Campinarana vegetation with the present work.

This study emphasizes the importance of carrying out floristic inventories in poorly known environments and of further studies with different approaches, such as ecological, phytogeographic and genetic.

Acknowledgements

We thank to the PPG-Botânica and INPA for providing the infrastructure for species identification; the INPA/MAUA Group, PELD (CNPq/CAPES/FAPS/BC, process 441590/2016-0), FAPEAM (PELD/FAPEAM, process 062.01357/2017), LBA Experiment in Amazonia, and the staff of the ATTO Project for financial and logistic support in the fieldwork; to the Fúvio Rubens Oliveira-da-Silva and S.R. Gradstein for critically reading the manuscript. This study was financed in part by the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior - Brasil (CAPES) Finance Code 001.

References

  • Adeney JM, Christensen NL, Vicentini A, Cohn-Haft M. 2016. White-sand ecosystems in Amazonia. Biotropica 48: 7-23.
  • Álvarez-Alonso J, Metz MR, Fine PVA. 2013. Habitat specialization by birds in Western Amazonian white-sand forests. Biotropica 45: 365-372.
  • Anderson AB, Prance GT, Albuquerque BWP. 1975. Estudos sobre a vegetação das campinas amazônicas III: a vegetação lenhosa da Campina da Reserva Biológica INPA SUFRAMA (Manaus Caracaraí, km 62). Acta Amazonica 5: 225-246.
  • Anderson AB. 1981. White-sand vegetation of Brazilian Amazonia. Biotropica 13: 199-210.
  • Barbé M, Chavel EE, Fenton NJ, et al 2016. Dispersal of bryophytes and ferns is facilitated by small mammals in the boreal forest. Écoscience 23: 67-76.
  • Bastos CJP, Sierra AM, Zartman CE. 2016. Three new species of Cheilolejeunea (Spruce) Steph. (Marchantiophyta, Lejeuneaceae) from northern Brazil. Phytotaxa 277: 36-46.
  • Bastos CJP, Zartman CE. 2017. A new species of Pycnolejeunea (Marchantiophyta, Lejeuneaceae) from Brazil. Neodiversity 10: 1-6.
  • Bastos CJP, Gradstein SR. 2020. The genus Cheilolejeunea (Marchantiophyta: Lejeuneaceae) in tropical America. Nova Hedwigia 111: 287-335.
  • Bastos CJP. 2012. Taxonomia e distribuição de Cheilolejeunea aneogyna (Spruce) A. Evans (Lejeuneaceae, Marchnatiophyta). Acta Botanica Brasilica 26: 709-713.
  • Benavides JC, Duque A, Duivenvoorden JF, Cleef AM. 2006. Species richness and distribution of understory bryophytes in different forest types in Colombia Amazonia. Journal of Bryology 28: 182-189.
  • BFG - The Brazil Flora Group. 2018. Brazilian Flora 2020: Innovation and collaboration to meet Target 1 of the Global Strategy for Plant Conservation (GSPC). Rodriguésia 69: 1513-1527.
  • Braga PI. 1978. Estudos da flora orquidológica do Estado do Amazonas III - X Brassocattleya rubyi Braga (Orchidaceae) híbrido natural novo da flora amazônica. Acta Amazonica 8: 371-378.
  • Bramley-Alves J, King DH, Robinson SA. 2014. Dominating the Antarctic environment: Bryophytes in a time of change. In: Hanson DT, Rice SK. (eds.) Photosynthesis in Bryophytes and early land plants. Advances in Photosynthesis and Respiration. Dordrecht, Springer. p. 309-324.
  • Buck WR. 2003. Guide to the Plants of Central French Guiana - Part 3. Mosses. Memoirs of The New York Botanical Garden 76: 26-123.
  • Carmo DM, Peralta DF. 2016. Survey of bryophytes in Serra da Canastra National Park, Minas Gerais, Brazil. Acta Botanica Brasilica 30: 254-265.
  • Carvalho-Silva M, Stech M, Soares-Silva LH, et al 2017. A molecular phylogeny of the Sematophyllaceae sl (Hypnales) based on plastid, mitochondrial and nuclear markers, and its taxonomic implications. Taxon 66: 811-831.
  • Coomes DA, Grubb PJ. 1996 Amazonian caatinga and related communities at La Esmeralda, Venezuela: forest structure, physiognomy and floristics, and control by soil factors. Vegetatio 122: 167-191.
  • Crandall-Stotler B, Stotler R, Long D. 2009. Morphology and classification of the Marchantiophyta. In: Goffinet B, Shaw AJ. Bryophyte Biology. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. p. 1-54.
  • Dauphin G. 2003. Ceratolejeunea (Lejeuneaceae: Lejeuneoideae). Flora Neotropica Monograph 90: 1-86.
  • Ducke A, Black GA. 1954. Notas sobre a fitogeografia da Amazônia brasileira. Boletim Técnico Instituto Agronômico do Norte 29: 1-62.
  • Ducke A. 1922. Plantes Nouvelles ou Peu connues de la Région Amazonienne. Archivos do Jardim Botânico do Rio de Janeiro 3: 3-269.
  • Ellwanger JH, Kulmann-Leal B, Kaminski VL, et al 2020. Beyond diversity loss and climate change: Impacts of Amazon deforestation on infectious diseases and public health. Annals of the Brazilian Academy of Sciences 92: 1-33.
  • Egler WA. 1960. Contribuição ao conhecimento dos campos da Amazônia. 1 - Os campos do Ariramba. Boletim do Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi, Série Botânica 4: 1-36.
  • Frahm JP. 2003. Manual of tropical bryology. Tropical Bryology 23: 1-196.
  • Fulford MH. 1966. Manual of the leafy Hepaticae of Latin America. Memoirs of The New York Botanical Garden 11: 173-276.
  • Garcia ET, Oliveira SM, Tavares-Martins ACC, Pôrto KC. 2020. Vertical gradient of epiphytic bryophytes in the Amazon: the rule and its exception. Cryptogamie, Bryologie 41: 55-65.
  • García-Villacorta R, Dexter KG, Pennington T. 2016. Amazonian white-sand forests show strong floristic links with surrounding oligotrophic habitats and the Guiana Shield. Biotropica 48: 47-57.
  • Goffinet B, Buck WR, Shaw JA. 2009. Morphology, anatomy, and classification of the Bryophyta. In: Goffinet B, Shaw AJ. (eds.) Bryophyte Biology . Cambridge, Cambridge University Press . p. 55-138.
  • Gradstein SR, Churchill SP, Salazar-Allen N. 2001. Guide to the bryophytes of tropical America. Memoirs of The New York Botanical Garden 86: 1-577.
  • Gradstein SR, Costa DP. 2003. The Hepaticae and Anthocerotae of Brazil. Memoirs of The New York Botanical Garden 88: 1-673.
  • Gradstein SR, Ilkiu-Borges AL. 2009. Guide to the plants of Central French Guiana. Part 4. Liverworts and hornworts. Memoirs of The New York Botanical Garden 76: 1-140.
  • Gradstein SR, Ilkiu-Borges AL. 2015. A taxonomic revision of the genus Odontoschisma (Marchantiophyta: Cephaloziaceae). Nova Hedwigia 100: 15-100.
  • Gradstein SR, Uribe J. 2011. A synopsis of the Frullaniaceae (Marchantiophyta) from Colombia. Caldasia 33: 367-396.
  • Gradstein SR. 1994. Lejeuneaceae: Ptychantheae, Brachiolejeuneae. Flora Neotropica Monograph 62: 1-216.
  • Gradstein SR. 2013. Afro-Amerian Hepatics revisited. Polish Botanical Journal 58: 149 -177.
  • Gradstein SR. 2016. The genus Plagiochila (Marchantiophyta) in Colombia. Revista de La Academia Colombiana de Ciencias Exactas, Físicas y Naturales 40: 104-136.
  • Gradstein SR. 2017. Bazzania (Marchantiophyta) in South America. Nova Hedwigia 105: 1-24.
  • Griffin D. 1975. The Bryology of a Brazilian campina forest. The Association of Southeastern Biologists Bulletin 22: 1-55.
  • Griffin D. 1979. Guia preliminar para as briófitas frequentes em Manaus e adjacências. Acta Amazonica 9: 1-67.
  • Guevara JE, Damasco G, Baraloto C, et al 2016. Low phylogenetic beta diversity and geographic neo-endemism in Amazonian white-sand forests. Biotropica 48: 34-46.
  • He XL. 1999. A taxonomic monograph of the genus Pycnolejeunea (Lejeuneaceae, Hepaticae). Acta Botanica Fennica 163: 1-77.
  • IBGE - Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística. 2012. Manual técnico da vegetação brasileira. 2nd. edn. Rio de Janeiro, Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística - IBGE.
  • Ilkiu-Borges AL .2006. A taxonomic monograph of the genus Prionolejeunea (Lejeuneaceae Jungermanniopsida). Göttingen, Cuvillier Verlag.
  • Ilkiu-Borges AL, Lisboa RCL. 2004. Os gêneros Cyclolejeunea, Haplolejeunea, Harpalejeunea, Lepidolejeunea e Rectolejeunea (Lejeuneaceae, Hepaticae) na Estação Científica Ferreira Penna, Pará, Brasil. Acta Botanica Brasilica 18: 539-555.
  • Ireland RR, Buck WR. 1994. Stereophyllaceae. Flora Neotropica Monograph 65: 1-49.
  • Klein VP, Piedade MTF. 2019. Orchidaceae occurring in white-sand ecosystems of the Uatumã Sustainable Development Reserve in Central Amazon. Phytotaxa 419: 113-148.
  • Koury CG, Rizzo E, Albuja MG. 2012. O turismo na Reserva de Desenvolvimento Sustentável do Uatumã: conjuntura atual e possibilidades de geração de renda para as comunidades locais. Manaus, Conservação e Desenvolvimento Sustentável - IDESAM.
  • Lima E, Oliveira-da-Silva FR, Ilkiu-Borges AL. 2018. Flora das cangas da Serra dos Carajás, Pará, Brasil: Frullaniaceae. Rodriguésia 69: 973-981.
  • Lisboa RCL. 1976. Estudos sobre a vegetação das campinas amazônicas V: Brioecologia de uma campina amazônica. Acta Amazonica 6: 171-191.
  • Lönnel N, Hylander K, Jonsson BG, Sundberg S. 2012. The fate of the missing spores-patterns of realized dispersal beyond the closest vicinity of a sporulating moss. PLOS ONE 7: e41987. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0041987.
    » https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0041987
  • Mota-de-Oliveira S, ter Steege H. 2015. Bryophyte communities in the Amazon forest are regulated by height on the host tree and site elevation. Journal of Ecology, 103: 441-450.
  • Oliveira-da-Silva FR, Ilkiu-Borges AL. 2018. Briófitas (Bryophyta e Marchantiophyta) das cangas da Serra dos Carajás, Pará, Brasil. Rodriguésia 69: 1405-1416.
  • Pereira MRS. 2019. Avanços florísticos e filogênicos de Calymperaceae Kindb. (Bryophyta) para Amazônia. PhD Thesis, Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia, Manaus.
  • Pires JM, Prance GT. 1985. The vegetation types of the Brazilian Amazon. In: Prance GT, Lovejoy TE. (eds.) Key Environments: Amazonia. 1st. edn. Oxford, Pergamon Press. p. 109-145.
  • Pócs T, Bernecker A, Tixier P. 2014. Synopsis and key to species of Neotropical Cololeijeunea (Lejeuneaceae). Acta Botanica Hungarica 56: 185-226.
  • Pócs T. 2016. Contribution to the bryoflora of Australia. VI. The genus Cololejeunea (Spruce) Steph. (Lejeuneaceae, Marchantiophyta). Polish Botanical Journal 61: 205-229.
  • Prance GT. 1996. Islands in Amazonia. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, series B 351: 823-833.
  • Reese WD. 1993. Calymperaceae. Flora Neotropica Monograph 58: 1-102.
  • Reichardt K, Santos A, Nascimento-Filho V, Bacc OOS. 1975. Movimento de água subterrânea em ecossistema campina amazônica. Acta Amazonica 6: 229-290.
  • Richards WP. 1984. The ecology of tropical forest bryophytes. In: Schuster RM. (ed.) New Manual of Bryology. Japan, Hattori Botanical Laboratory. p. 1233-1270.
  • Robbins RG. 1952. Bryophyta Ecology of a dune area in New Zealand vegetation. Acta Geobotânica 4: 1-131.
  • Santos ND, Costa DP, Kinoshita LS, Shepherd GJ. 2011. Aspectos brioflorísticos e fitogeográficos de duas formações costeiras de Floresta Atlântica da Serra do Mar, Ubatuba/ SP, Brasil. Biota Neotropica 11: 425-438.
  • Santos ND, Costa DP. 2010. Phytogeography of the liverwort flora of the Atlantic Forest of southeastern Brazil. Journal of Bryology 32: 9-22.
  • Shi XQ, Zhu RL. 2015. A revision of Archilejeunea s.str. (Lejeuneaceae, Marchantiophyta). Nova Hedwigia 100: 589-601.
  • Shi XQ, Gradstein SR, Zhu RL. 2015. Type studies on Archilejeunea (Lejeuneaceae, Marchantiophyta): Five new synonyms and a new combination. Phytotaxa 195: 248-250. doi: 10.11646/phytotaxa.195.3.5.
    » https://doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.195.3.5
  • Sierra AM, Vanderpoorten A, Gradstein SR, Pereira MR, Bastos CJP, Zartman CE. 2018. Bryophytes of Jaú National Park (Amazonas, Brazil): Estimating species detectability and richness in a lowland Amazonian megareserve. The Bryologist 121: 571-588.
  • Silveira M. 2017. O complexo vegetacional sobre areia branca no Alto Juruá. In: Brito TF, Silva RC, Oliveira SAV, Silveira M. (eds.) Complexo vegetacional sobre areia branca: Campinaranas do Sudoeste da Amazônia. Rio Branco, Editora da Universidade Federal do Acre - Edufac. p. 11-19.
  • Smith RJ, Stark LR. 2014. Habitat vs. dispersal constraints on bryophyte diversity in the Mojave Desert, USA. Journal of Arid Environments 102: 76-81.
  • Spruce R. 1884. Hepaticae Amazonicae et Andiane. Transactions and Proceedings of Society of Edinburgh 15: 1-308.
  • Vittoz P, Camenisch M, Mayor R, Miserere L, Vust M, Theurillat JP. 2010. Subalpine-nival gradient of species richness for vascular plants, bryophytes and lichens in the Swiss Inner Alps. Botanica Helvetica 120: 139-149.
  • Yano O. 1984. Briófitas. In: Fidalgo O, Bononi VLR. (eds.) Técnicas de coleta, preservação e herborização de material botânico. São Paulo, Instituto de Botânica.
  • Yano O. 1992. Leucobryaceae (Bryopsida) do Brasil. PhD Thesis, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo.

Publication Dates

  • Publication in this collection
    12 Nov 2021
  • Date of issue
    Jul-Sep 2021

History

  • Received
    21 Sept 2020
  • Accepted
    18 Nov 2020
Sociedade Botânica do Brasil SCLN 307 - Bloco B - Sala 218 - Ed. Constrol Center Asa Norte CEP: 70746-520 Brasília/DF. - Alta Floresta - MT - Brazil
E-mail: acta@botanica.org.br