Epidemiological study on professional football injuries during the 2011 Copa America, Argentina

Abstracts

OBJECTIVE:

Develop an epidemiological study of injuries occurred among male professional football players during the Copa America 2011, held in Argentina.

METHODS:

We conducted a retrospective study of injuries sustained during the 43rd edition of the Copa America football in Argentina, in 2011. The lesions were evaluated by the medical department of the selections and reported to the CONMEBOL. The data were compiled and reported in accordance with rules established by the FIFA Medical Assessment and Research Centre (F-MARC) in 2005.

RESULTS:

There was a higher prevalence of lesions in the lower limbs. Thighs and knees were the most affected segments. The most frequent diagnoses were muscle injuries. The injuries were mostly minor degrees of severity and there was little difference in the prevalence of lesions according to the stages of the match, with slight predominance in the final 15 minutes. The incidence of lesions per 1,000 game hours was similar to the average found in the literature.

CONCLUSIONS:

The results obtained allowed us to outline a profile of the prevalence, distribution per body segment, minute in which occurred and severity of injuries in professional football players of participating teams in the Copa America 2011 in Argentina. The extreme rigor of referees may be partly attributed to the highly competitive nature of international tournaments. However, this results cannot be considered definitive because of the need to be compared to other epidemiological studies with same design using similar concepts and criteria.

Athletes; Football/injuries; Epidemiology

OBJETIVO:

Desenvolver estudo epidemiológico sobre as lesões ocorridas entre os jogadores profissionais de futebol masculino durante a Copa América de 2011, na Argentina.

MÉTODOS:

Fez-se estudo retrospectivo das lesões ocorridas durante a 43ª edição da Copa América de Futebol na Argentina, em 2011. As lesões foram avaliadas pelo departamento médico das seleções e reportadas à Conmebol. Os dados foram compilados e descritos de acordo com as normas estabelecidas pelo Centro de Pesquisas e Avaliações Médicas (F-Marc) da Fédération Internationale de Football Association (Fifa) em 2005.

RESULTADOS:

Ocorreu maior prevalência de lesões nos membros inferiores, sendo coxas e joelhos os segmentos mais acometidos. Os diagnósticos mais frequentes foram lesões musculares. As lesões apresentaram em sua maior parte grau leve de severidade e ocorreu pequena diferença na prevalência de lesões de acordo com as etapas da partida, havendo discreto predomínio nos 15 minutos finais. A incidência de lesões por 1.000 horas de jogo foi similar à média encontrada na literatura.

CONCLUSÕES:

A análise dos resultados obtidos permitiu traçar um perfil da prevalência, distribuição por segmento corporal, minuto em que ocorreram e severidade das lesões dos jogadores de futebol profissional das seleções participantes da Copa América de 2011 na Argentina. O maior rigor dos árbitros pode ser em parte atribuído à grande competitividade de torneios internacionais. Entretanto, esses resultados não podem ser considerados definitivos em virtude da necessidade de ser comparados a outros estudos epidemiológicos de mesmo espectro que usem conceitos e critérios semelhantes.

Atletas; Futebol/lesões; ; Epidemiologia

Introduction

Football (soccer) is the most popular type of sport worldwide. It has been estimated that at least 200,000 professional football players and 240 million amateur players practice this sport, which covers all age groups and both genders. It also presents a high injury rate.^{1 5}Approximately 80% of these individuals are male.^{6 7} It is a sport that involves much physical contact and short, fast discontinuous movements such as acceleration, deceleration, changes of direction, jumps and pivots. Because of these characteristics, it presents high numbers of injuries in absolute terms^{8 9} and has aroused great interest within the field of sports traumatology.

High-yield sports have gone through many changes over recent years, particularly in relation to increased physical demands and risk of injury. It has been estimated that the incidence of football injuries is around 10-15/1,000 hours of training, and can be four to six times greater during games, depending on the study design and the criteria used for defining and characterizing the injuries.¹⁰ This heterogeneity causes difficulty with regard to epidemiological analysis, data gathering and the uniformity of the diagnostic criteria and recovery time.

Methodological variations give rise to significant differences in the results and make conclusions and comparisons between studies very difficult. With the aim of minimizing these discrepancies, a group of specialists at FIFA's Medical Assessment and Research Center (F-MARC) was brought together in 2005 and established a consensus by defining concepts and standard methodology for studies on football injuries.¹¹

Materials and methods

The concept used to defined football injuries was the same as chosen by Fuller et al.¹¹ for the FIFA consensus of 2005, i.e. describing them as any physical complaint sustained by a player that results from training or games, independent of any need for medical care or time off from activities.

The subjects of this investigation were the players in the 12 teams that took part in the 43^rd Copa America tournament, which was held in eight cities in Argentina between July 1 and 24, 2011, organized by Conmebol. During this period, the team studied played 26 games and each team participated in a minimum of three games, equivalent to the preliminary phase of the tournament, and a maximum of six games, if they participated in the final or the third-place playoff. The general data on the tournament are gathered together in Table 1.

Table 1
General data on the tournament.

Teams participating	12
Players per team	23
Goalkeepers per team	3
Total number of players	276
Total number of matches	26
Games with extra time	3
Minutes played	2,430
Players injured	26
Total number of injuries	63

• Source: Conmebol

The injuries were evaluated by each team's medical department at the ends of the games. The records containing the data relating to the type of injury, body segment affected, date of occurrence, severity and minute of the game in which they occurred were informed by the teams' physicians and were complied by a member of the tournament organization. Appendix A on the last page presents FIFA's standard form in Spanish that was used by the physicians during the competition.

Teams participating 12 Players per team 23 Goalkeepers per team 3 Total number of players 276 Total number of matches 26 Games with extra time 3 Minutes played 2,430 Players injured 26 Total number of injuries 63 Source: Conmebol

The severity of the injuries was subdivided according to the estimated recovery period in days, as follows. Grade I/ insignificant: no time off needed; grade II/minimal: 1 to 3 days off; grade III/mild: 4 to 7 days off; grade IV/moderate: 8 to 28 days off; grade V/severe: more than 28 days off; and grade VI/ career-terminating.¹¹ The final results from this study were assessed retrospectively and were grouped in accordance with FIFA's methods, including the segment classification, injury mechanism (trauma or overload) and diagnoses (Annex 1).

Results

There were 26 games, played over a 17-day period. Among these, the duration of 23 games was 90 minutes and three games lasted for 120 minutes, thus totaling 2,430 minutes of game. In total, 26 players suffered injuries, accumulating 63 injuries.

The type of injury most frequently sustained was bruising (25 cases), and the regions most frequently affected were the thighs (17 injuries) and knees (15 injuries). Table 2 and Fig. 1 present the injuries groups according to diagnosis, and Table 3 and Fig. 2 gather together the injuries according to the part of the body affected.

Table 2
Diagnosis.

Injury Cases	(n)
Bruise	25
Contracture	12
Tear	7
Synovitis	6
Sprain	4
Strain	3
Laceration	2
Others	3
Total	63

• Source: Conmebol

Table3 - Body segment affected.

Anatomical location Cases	(n)
Thigh	17
Knee	15
Ankle	10
Lower leg	8
Foot	4
Head/neck	2
Face	2
Lumbar spine	2
Chest	1
Shoulder	1
Hand	1
Total	63

• Fonte: Conmebol

Fig. 1
Diagnoses.

Fig. 2
Segment affected.

Among the 26 players injured, 13 (50%) suffered injuries due to contact, while the other 13 (50%) became hurt through indirect trauma. The referees considered that nine of the 13 cases of contact (69%) were fouls, but only one player was sent off.

The Peruvian team did not send in the data relating to the minute of the game at which the injury occurred, nor did they inform the length of time off that these players needed, as estimates for injury severity. In individual terms, four Peruvian players suffered four injuries each, and these were the players who individually presented the greatest numbers of injuries. The Peruvian team was also the one that had the greatest number of injuries, totaling 35. Two Chilean players suffered injuries in the game against Peru and the time during the game at which these occurred was also not informed.

In relation to the minute of the game, 26 injuries were reported. Of these, 13 (50%) occurred during the first half, 12 (46%) occurred during the second half and one (4%) occurred during extra time. The injuries suffered by players of the Peruvian team were excluded from the statistics, because the minute at which they occurred was not specified.

The halves of the game were subdivided into 15-minute periods and extra time. The period with the greatest number of injuries was from the 76^th to the 90^th minute of the game, with a total of seven injuries (27%). The distribution of the injuries according to period of the game is shown in Fig. 3.

Fig. 3
Injury distribution according to period of the game.

The estimated number of injuries according to the duration of the activity was 70.7 per 1,000 hours of game, and the incidence of injuries per tournament game was 2.42 over the duration of the competition.

With regard to the prevalence per region of the body, it was seen that 54 (85.7%) of the injuries occurred in the lower limbs and nine (14.3%) occurred elsewhere in the body. Two (3.3%) occurred in the arms, three (4.7%) in the trunk region and four (6.3%) in the head and neck.

Bruises accounted for 39% of all of the injuries (25 in total), followed by muscle contractures with 19% (12 in total). It was noted that nine of the 25 bruises (36%) occurred in the knee, which was the segment most affected. The distribution of these injuries according to body segment is presented in Table 4 and Fig. 4. In relation to muscle contractures, the segment most affected was the thigh, accounting for seven of the 12 injuries (58%), while three (25%) occurred in the calf. The adductor muscles were more frequently involved in the thigh, accounting for three of the seven injuries (43%).

Table 4
Distribution of bruises according to body segment.

Segment	Cases
Knee	9
Lower leg	4
Thigh	3
Ankle	2
Foot	2
Face	2
Chest	1
Hand	1
Shoulder	1
Total	25

• Source: Conmebol

Fig. 4
Injury distribution according to period of the game.

The distribution of the injuries according to severity showed that grade II/minimal injuries (nine cases) were responsible for 32.14% of the total, followed by grade IV/ moderate injuries (eight cases), with 28.58%. Grade V/severe injuries (one case) accounted for only 3.58%, thus totaling 28 injuries reported.The Peruvian team was excluded from these statistics because data relating to severity were not provided in detail.

Fig. 5 shows the distribution of the injuries according to severity. The incidence of the different types of injury according to the players' positions on the pitch was not evaluated.

Fig. 5
Injury distribution according to severity.

Discussion

Several epidemiological studies on the incidence and causes of football injuries have been conducted,^{1 2 5 7 11}with the aim of reducing the morbidity in these cases and increasing the players' safety. Methodological problems relating to these investigations were described in detail by Finch et al.,¹² Jung and Dvorak¹³ and Noyes et al.,¹⁴ and these included differences in the concepts used, differences relating to data-gathering and lack of uniformity regarding diagnostic criteria and recovery time. A variety of risk factors and preventive measures have been cited,^{15 17} but few groups have investigated the real effectiveness of such measures.^{18 27} Previous injuries and inadequate rehabilitation were indicated as risk factors for future injuries by Dvorak et al.¹⁵ and Hawkins et al.,²⁸ and up to 25% of the cases are recurrent injuries.^{29 30}

Younger football players present greater incidence of injuries to the arms, head and face than the average.³¹Sullivan et al.³² suggested that the more reckless behavior of these players during sports activities is the main explanation for this finding. In the legs, too, it is noticeable that there is greater incidence of bruises among young players. Most of these are caused by trauma, although it is observed that over the football season, up to 34% of the injuries are due to overload.³⁰

With regard to prevalence according to diagnosis, bruises, strains and sprains are the injuries most frequently encountered in the literature.^{33 35} Our study found similar results, given that in addition to showing that leg injuries formed the absolute majority, the types more found were bruises and contractures. Since most of the injuries occurred in the muscles of the thigh and lower leg, the results obtained were concordant, given that they showed that the thigh muscles were the main injury site.

Approximately 28% of the injuries occurred during foul tackles, and this proportion is even higher in international competitions.³⁶ In another study, Fuller et al.³⁷ pointed out that referees consider 47% of the tackles responsible for cases of injury to be fouls. The data gathered in the present study indicate that the referees were more rigorous during the Copa America, such that 69% of these cases were considered to be fouls. Traditionally, it is observed that referees are less tolerant in international games with regard to physical contact between players, although the reasons for this have not been discussed.

Determining the exact time during the game at which injuries occur is also fundamental, given that the great majority of them occur in the first and last 15 minutes of the game.³⁸ In this regard, the present study found similar results, given that most of the injuries occurred during the last 15 minutes of the game. The estimate for the number of injuries according to the duration of the activity was 70.7 for every 1,000 hours of game, and this was compatible with the data in the literature (40-90/1,000 hours of game).¹⁰ The large number of injuries observed may reflect greater intensity of the matches because of the extremely competitive nature of tournaments between nations. However, further studies are needed in order to confirm this finding.

The classification of the injury severity generally reflects the length of the player's time off. One model that has traditionally been used³⁰divides injuries into grades I, II and III, such that grade I includes time off < 7 days, grade II between 7 and 28 days and grade III > 28 days. Another classification that has commonly been used separates injuries into trauma and overload types.Van Mechelen et al.³⁹defined acute injuries as those that were caused by a single traumatic event and overload injuries as those caused by repetitive microtrauma. The present study was based on the FIFA consensus of 2005, which divides injuries into six categories, and it demonstrated that the majority were classified as mild injuries with time off of no more than three days. This finding is concordant with the general findings in the literature.

It has also been observed in some epidemiological studies that the risk of injury varies from one player to another according to their playing positions.^{34 40} However, with the advent of modern football, in which the players hardly maintain fixed positions at all, this situation has changed.

This can be confirmed from the studies by Ekstrand et al.^{5 41} and McMaster et al.,³⁴ which did not find any significant difference in player position with regard to the incidence of injury. Goalkeepers account for the majority of arm injuries, given that this is the only playing position in which these limbs are used to perform the function.⁴²The present study did not take injured players' positions into account because of the scarcity of pertinent information.

Certain methodological limitations of the present study need to be pointed out.There is a possibility that the outcome information may have been biased, given that precise data on injuries could have been altered or even omitted by the teams' physicians. The information obtained in relation to injuries that occurred during games played by the Peruvian team were incomplete, thus making it impossible to include data relating to the time during the game at which the injury occurred and relating to estimated severity according to the time off. The effect of these potential biases of information on the prevalences detected therefore cannot be adequately estimated. Furthermore, the small size of the sample of players and matches and the cross-sectional nature of this study impede establishment of an unequivocal cause-effect relationship. We also emphasize that this was the first study conducted at this level involving Conmebol.

Conclusions

The analysis on the results obtained from the present study made it possible to outline a profile for the prevalence, distribution according to body segment, time of occurrence and severity of injuries among professional football players in the national teams that took part in the Copa America in Argentina in 2011.

The great majority of the findings from this study are concordant with the data obtained from other epidemiological studies involving football injuries.There was greater prevalence of injuries in the lower limbs; the most frequent diagnoses were muscle injuries and most of the injuries were of mild grade of severity. Moreover, injuries occurred slightly more often during the last 15 minutes of the match. These observations indicate that the statistics on such studies have an unvarying and predictable pattern. There was coherence in the data obtained in relation the incidence of injuries per 1,000 hours of game.

However, the referees' rigor in relation to physical contact between the players was much greater than the average found in the literature. This may reflect discrepancies in the methodology used, between the different studies, as well as suggesting that there is greater intensity and competitiveness in games in tournaments between nations. The conflicting results cannot be considered to be definitive, since they need to be compared with other epidemiological studies that use similar designs and concepts.

REFERENCES

• ¹
  Inklaar H. Soccer injuries. Incidence and severity. Sports Med. 1994;18(1):55-73.
• ²
  Inklaar H. Soccer injuries II. Aetiology and prevention. Sports Med. 1994;18(2):81-93.
• ³
  Tucker AM. Common soccer injuries. Diagnosis, treatment and rehabilitation. Sports Med. 1997;25(1):21-32.
• ⁴
  Hoy K, Lindblad BE, Terkelsen CJ, Helleland HE, Terkelsen CJ. European soccer injuries. Am J Sports Med. 1992;20(3):318-22.
• ⁵
  Ekstrand J, Gillquist J. The avoidability of soccer injuries. Int J Sports Med. 1983;4(2):1424-8.
• ⁶
  Timpka T, Risto O, Bjormsjo M. Boys soccer league injuries: a community-based study of time-loss from sports participation and long-term sequelae. Eur J Public Health. 2008;18(1):19-24.
• ⁷
  Junge A, Dvorak J. Soccer injuries: a review on incidence and prevention. Sports Med. 2004;34(13):929-38.
• ⁸
  Matsudo V, Martin V. Lesões no futebol profissional. Projeto Piloto. Ambito Med Desp. 1995;12:5-10.
• ⁹
  Keller CS, Noyes FR, Bencher CR. The medical aspects of soccer injury epidemiology. Am J Sports Med. 1987;15(3):230-7.
• ¹⁰
  Paus V, Torrengo F, Del Compare P. Incidence of injuries in juvenile soccer players. Rev Asoc Argent Traumatol Deporte. 2003;10(1):28-34.
• ¹¹
  Fuller CW, Ekstrand J, Junge A, Andersen TE, Bahr R, Dvorak J, et al. Consensus statement on injury definitions and data collection procedures in studies of football (soccer) injuries. Br J Sports Med. 2006;40:193-201.
• ¹²
  Finch CF. An overview of some definitional issues for sports injury surveillance. Sports Med. 1997;24(3):157-63.
• ¹³
  Junge A, Dvorak J. Influence of definition and data collection on the incidence of injuries in football. Am J Sports Med. 2000;28(Suppl 5):S40-6.
• ¹⁴
  Noyes FR, Lindenfeld TN, Marshall MT. What determines an athletic injury (definition)? Who determines an injury (occurrence)? Am J Sports Med. 1988;16(Suppl 1):S65-8.
• ¹⁵
  Dvorak J, Junge A, Chomiak J, Graf-Baumann T, Peterson L, Rösch D et al. Risk factor analysis for injuries in football players: possibilities for a prevention program. Am J Sports Med. 2000;28(Suppl 5):S69-74.
• ¹⁶
  Engström BK, Renstrom PA. How can injuries be prevented in the World Cup soccer athlete? Clin Sports Med. 1998;17(4):755-68.
• ¹⁷
  Taimela S, Kujala UM, Osterman K. Intrinsic risk factors and athletic injuries. Sports Med. 1990;9(4):205-15.
• ¹⁸
  Askling C, Karlsson J, Thorstensson A. Hamstring injury occurrence in elite soccer players after preseason strength training with eccentric overload. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2003;13(4):244-50.
• ¹⁹
  Caraffa A, Cerulli G, Projetti M, Aisa G, Rizzo A. Prevention of anterior cruciate ligament injuries in soccer: a prospective controlled study of proprioceptive training. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 1996;4(1):19-21.
• ²⁰
  Ekstrand J, Gillquist J, Liljedahl SO. Prevention of soccer injuries: supervision by doctor and physiotherapist. Am J Sports Med. 1983;11(3):116-20.
• ²¹
  Heidt RS Jr, Sweeterman LM, Carlonas RL, Traub JA, Tekulve FX. Avoidance of soccer injuries with preseason conditioning. Am J Sports Med. 2000;28(5):659-62.
• ²²
  Hewett TE, Lindenfeld TN, Riccobene JV, Noyes FR. The effect of neuromuscular training on the incidence of knee injury in female athletes: a prospective study. Am J Sports Med. 1999;27(6):699-706.
• ²³
  Junge A, Rosch D, Peterson L, Graf-Baumann T, Dvorak J. Prevention of soccer injuries: a prospective intervention study in youth amateur players. Am J Sports Med. 2002;30(5):652-9.
• ²⁴
  Mandelbaum BR. ACL tears in female athletes: the challenge of prevention with neuromuscular training programs. In: Annual proceedings from the AAOS Meeting: New Orleans, 2003.
• ²⁵
  Söderman K, Werner S, Pietila T, Engström B, Alfredson H. Balance board training: prevention of traumatic injuries of the lower extremities in female soccer players? A prospective randomized intervention study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2000;8(6):356-63.
• ²⁶
  Surve I, Schwellnus MP, Noakes T, Lombard C. A fivefold reduction in the incidence of recurrent ankle sprains in soccer players using the Sport-Stirrup orthosis. Am J Sports Med. 1994;22(5):601-6.
• ²⁷
  Tropp H, Askling C, Gillquist J. Prevention of ankle sprains. Am J Sports Med. 1985;13(4):259-62.
• ²⁸
  Hawkins RD, Hulse MA, Wilkinson C, Hodson A, Gibson M. The association football medical research programme: an audit of injuries in professional football. Br J Sports Med. 2001;35(1):43-7.
• ²⁹
  Nielsen AB, Yde J. Epidemiology and traumatology of injuries in soccer. Am J Sports Med. 1989;17(6):803-7.
• ³⁰
  Hawkins RD, Fuller CW. A prospective epidemiological study of injuries in four English professional football clubs. Br J Sports Med. 1999;33(3):196-203.
• ³¹
  Hoff GL, Martin A. Outdoor and indoor soccer: injures among youth player. Am J.Sports Med. 1986;14:231-3.
• ³²
  Sullivan JA, Gross RH, Grana WA, Garcia-Moral CA. Evaluation of injuries in youth soccer. Am J Sports Med. 1980;8(5):325-7.
• ³³
  S Schmidt-Olsen, L K Bünemann, V Lade, J O Brassøe. Soccer injuries of youth. Int. J Sports Med. 1985;19(3):161-4.
• ³⁴
  McMaster W. Injuries in Soccer. Am J Sports Med. 1978;6(6):354-7.
• ³⁵
  Ekstrand J, Nigg N. Surface-related injuries in soccer. Sports Med. 1989;8(1):56-62.
• ³⁶
  Junge A, Dvorak J, Graf-Baumann T, Peterson L. Football injuries during Fifa tournaments and the Olympic Games, 1998-2001: development and implementation of an injuryreporting system. Am J Sports Med. 2004;32(Suppl 1):80S-9S.
• ³⁷
  Fuller C, Junge A, Dvorak J. An assessment of football referees decisions in incidents leading to player injuries. Am J Sports Med. 2004;32(Suppl 1):17S-2S.
• ³⁸
  Rahnama N, Reilly T, Lees A. Injury risk associated with playing actions during competitive soccer. Br J Sports Med. 2002;36(5):354-9.
• ³⁹
  Van Mechelen W. Sports injury surveillance systems. 'One size fits all'? Sports Med. 1997;24(3):164-8.
• ⁴⁰
  Engströn B, Johanson C, Tornkusist H. Soccer injuries among elite female players. Am J Sports Med. 1991;19:273-5.

Publication Dates

• Publication in this collection
  Apr 2013

History

• Received
  14 June 2012
• Accepted
  03 Sept 2012