Acessibilidade / Reportar erro

The use of bone morphogenetic proteins (BMP) and pseudarthrosis, a literature review Work performed at the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital Dom Hélder Câmara, Recife, PE, Brazil.

ABSTRACT

Bone morphogenetic proteins (BMP) are multi-functional growth factors to promote bone healing with the proposal of less morbidity compared to the usual methods of bone graft harvest. Pseudoarthrosis occur when the fusion attempt fails, a solid fusion is not achieved, or there is motion across the segment leading to it, and it can be clinically symptomatic as pain, deformity, neurocompression, or hardware failure. BMPs are used at spinal fusion as a tool for the treatment of degenerative, traumatic, neoplastic and infectious conditions of the spine. This review shows that the use of BMPS is effective and secure when compared with iliac crest bone graft (ICGB); however, depending of the location of usage (cervical spine, lumbar spine or sacrum) and the medical status of the patient (presence of comorbidities, tobacco usage), it is more likely to exhibit complications. Therefore, the use of these proteins must be an informed decision of patient and physician preferences.

Keywords:
Bone morphogenetic protein 2; Bone morphogenetic proteins 7; Pseudarthrosis

RESUMO

Proteínas morfogenéticas do osso (Bone morphogenetic proteins [BMP]) são fatores de crescimento multifuncionais que promovem cicatrização óssea, propõem menos comorbidades comparada com os métodos usuais de colheita de enxerto ósseo. Pseudoartroses ocorrem quando a tentativa de fusão óssea falha, uma fusão sólida não é atingida ou quando há movimentação do segmento que leva à pseudoartrose, que pode ser clinicamente sintomática com dor, deformidade, neurocompressão ou falha na colocação de material de síntese. As BMPs são usadas em fusão colunar como ferramenta para o tratamento de trauma degenerativo, condições neoplásicas e infecciosas da coluna. A presente revisão da literatura mostra que o uso de BMPs é efetivo e seguro quando comparado com enxerto ósseo ilíaco. No entanto, a depender do local de uso (coluna cervical ou lombar ou sacro) e do estado médico do paciente (presença de comorbidades, tabagismo), é mais propício o aparecimento de complicações. Portanto, o uso dessas proteínas deve ser efetivado após uma decisão conjunta de preferências médicas e do paciente.

Palavras-chave:
morfogenéticas ósseas 2; Proteína morfogenética óssea 7; Pseudoartrose

Introduction

Bone morphogenetic proteins (BMP) are multi-functional growth factors that belong to the transforming growth factor beta (TGF-beta) superfamily, they were introduced in the medical scenario to promote bone healing with the proposal of less morbidity compared to the usual methods of bone graft harvest; it is the only bone inducer with level I of clinical evidence. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved its use in July of 2002 for anterior approaches of lumbar spine fusion procedures.

The spinal fusion is a tool for the treatment of degenerative, traumatic, neoplastic and infectious conditions of the spine, it can be achieved with interbody fusion, posterior or posterolateral fusion and circumferencial fusion. The most used examples of BMP's are recombinant human BMP-2 (rhBMP-2 is approved for anterior lumbar interbody fusions - ALIF) and recombinant human BMP-7 (rhBMP-7 has received a humanitarian device exemption for revision posterolateral lumbar fusion operation).

Implants containing BMP's are promising to its safety and it is as effective as iliac crest bone graft (ICBG). Adopting the use of it brings high costs and it has safety concerns with reported complication specifics to its use, including osteolysis, ectopic bone formation, radiculitis, cervical soft tissue swelling and pseudoarthrosis.

Nowadays the greatest use of BMP is for off label treatments as an adjunt to allograft or autograft bone - often replacing the use of ICBG in mandibular reconstruction, unspecific oral and maxillofacial facial surgeries, cervical spine fusion, pseudoarthrosis fusion. But it is still in the need of further investigation related to its collateral effects.

Pseudoarthrosis occur when the fusion attempt fails, a solid fusion is not achieved, or there is motion across the segment leading to it, and it can be clinically symptomatic as pain, deformity, neurocompression or hardware failure. There are two types: hypertrophic/hypercascular and atrophic/avascular, the last one is applicable osteoinductive treatment with BMP. This review intends to correlate and clarify the use of BMP's and its bias on pseudoarthrosis, when it is a correction or cause factor.

Methods

A qualitative systematic review of articles about the use of Bone Morphogenetic Protein in Pseudarthrosis was developed on a basis of preselected data. It was performed a search of literature from the online database BVS and SCOPUS from January 2006 to November 2015. The search was focused from the following terms: (1) 'Pseudarthrosis' {Medical Subject Headings} [MeSH term]; and (2) 'Bone Morphogenetic Proteins' {Medical Subject Headings} [MeSH term], these terms were chosen to define our central matter of the paper and all articles were evaluated with rigor to proper sampling.

The analysis of the articles follows predefined eligibility criteria. We adopt the following inclusion criteria: (1) original articles with full text online access; (2) From the relevant source titles: 'Spine', 'Injury', 'Spine Journal', 'Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery Series A', 'Journal of Neurosurgery Spine' and 'Journal of Orthopaedic Research'; (3) Observational, experimental or quasi-experimental studies; (4) Writings in English only; (5) Studies which focus on the use of BMP in pseudarthrosis.

Exclusion criteria were: (1) other projects, such as case reports, case series, literature review and comments, (2) The non-original studies, including editorials, comments, prefaces, brief comments and letter to the editor; (3) Productions that did not accomplish the proposed theme; and (4) the articles in which the objective of the study did not matched the theme purposed by the systematic review in question.

We found applicable 85 articles that, when screened, resulted in 24 articles that met the criteria of evidence and were included in this review (Table 1).

Table 1-
The use of bone morphogenetic proteins and pseudarthrosis review.

Discussion

BMPs were developed with the goal of improving clinical outcomes through the promotion of bony healing and reducing morbidity from ICBG (still considered 'gold standard' to multilevel spine fusion).11. Mulconrey DS, Bridwell KH, Flynn J, Cronen GA, Rose PS. Bone Morphogenetic Protein (RhBMP-2) as a substitute for iliac crest bone graft in multilevel adult spinal deformity surgery: minimum two- year evaluation of fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008;33(20):2153-9.;22. Dagostino PR, Whitmore RG, Smith GA, Maltenfort MG, Ratliff JK. Impact of bone morphogenetic proteins on frequency of revision surgery, use of autograft bone, and total hospital charges in surgery for lumbar degenerative disease: review of the nationwide inpatient sample from 2002 to 2008. Spine J. 2014;14(1):20-30. Spinal fusion procedure is indicated for a variety of pathological states including spinal instability secondary to trauma, infection, or neoplasm as well as intractable axial pain caused by degenerative disorders.33. Lina IA, Puvanesarajah V, Liauw JA, Lo S-L, Santiago-Dieppa DR, Hwang L, et al. Quantitative study of parathyroid hormone (1-34) and bone morphogenetic protein-2 on spinal fusion outcomes in a rabbit model of lumbar dorsolateral intertransverse process arthrodesis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) . 2014;39(5):347-55. Achieving fusion is difficult because of poor local bone quality and long fusions have a negative variable that inhibits a solid fusion, and the BMP is been researched as a potential solution for this problem.

Bone morphogenetic and osteogenetic proteins are multifunctional growth factors that belong to the transforming growth factor-b superfamily. Although osteogenetic proteins are primarily considered osteogenic factors, further investigations have shown that these proteins are also essential for embryogenesis and organogenesis, and that they have pleiotropic roles in cell growth, differentiation, migration, and apoptosis. The most used examples of BMP's are rhBMP-2 (approved for anterior lumbar interbody fusions - ALIF) and rhBMP-7 (has received a humanitarian device exemption approval for repair of lumbar pseudarthrosis).

By July of 2002, the FDA approved the use of rhBMP-2 combined with a biologic carrier of collagen (bovine type I collagen) as a substitute for single level ALIF.11. Mulconrey DS, Bridwell KH, Flynn J, Cronen GA, Rose PS. Bone Morphogenetic Protein (RhBMP-2) as a substitute for iliac crest bone graft in multilevel adult spinal deformity surgery: minimum two- year evaluation of fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008;33(20):2153-9.;22. Dagostino PR, Whitmore RG, Smith GA, Maltenfort MG, Ratliff JK. Impact of bone morphogenetic proteins on frequency of revision surgery, use of autograft bone, and total hospital charges in surgery for lumbar degenerative disease: review of the nationwide inpatient sample from 2002 to 2008. Spine J. 2014;14(1):20-30.;44. Singh K, Nandyala SV, Marquez- Lara A, Cha TD, Khan SN, Fineberg SJ, et al. Clinical sequelae after rhBMP-2 use in a minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. Spine J . 2013;13(9):1118-25.;55. Hoffmann MF, Jones CB, Sietsema DL. Complications of rhBMP-2 utilization for posterolateral lumbar fusions requiring reoperation: a single practice, retrospective case series report. Spine J . 2013;13(10):1244-52.;66. Veillette CJH, McKee MD. Growth factors - BMPs, DBMs, and buffy coat products: are there any proven differences amongst them? Injury. 2007;38 Suppl. 1:S38-48. According to Nadyala et al.77. Nandyala SV, Marquez- Lara A, Fineberg SJ, Pelton M, Singh K. Prospective, randomized, controlled trial of silicate-substituted calcium phosphate versus rhBMP-2 in a minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) . 2014;39(3):185-91. the rhBMPs are currently the most effective osteobiologic agents to increase the rate of arthrodesis but are often used as an off label application. Mulconrey et al.11. Mulconrey DS, Bridwell KH, Flynn J, Cronen GA, Rose PS. Bone Morphogenetic Protein (RhBMP-2) as a substitute for iliac crest bone graft in multilevel adult spinal deformity surgery: minimum two- year evaluation of fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008;33(20):2153-9. describes sustainable results of success, by multiple centers, demonstrating to be superior to ICBG for ALIF. Its use had a rapidly increasing in the United States, despite the initial high costs.55. Hoffmann MF, Jones CB, Sietsema DL. Complications of rhBMP-2 utilization for posterolateral lumbar fusions requiring reoperation: a single practice, retrospective case series report. Spine J . 2013;13(10):1244-52.

The study of Klimo et al.88. Klimo P Jr, Peelle MW. Use of polyetheretherketone spacer and recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 in the cervical spine: a radiographic analysis. Spine J . 2009;9(12):959-66. has demonstrated that the fusion process using rhBMP-2 is a dynamic one, with osteolysis dominating the initial phase, leading to end-plate resorption and consequently loss of some of the disk space height and sagittal alignment that was achieved with surgery. The rhBMP-7 has been documented as a potential treatment alternative for different diseases, including bone disease, stroke, inflammatory bowel disease, prostate cancer, and chronic renal disease.99. Furlan JC, Perrin RG, Govender PV, Petrenko Y, Massicotte EM, Rampersaud YR, et al. Use of osteogenic protein-1 in patients at high risk for spinal pseudarthrosis: a prospective cohort study assessing safety, health- related quality of life, and radiographic fusion. J Neurosurg Spine. 2007;7(5):486-95. More explicitly, rhBMP-7 plays an important role in bone formation by inducing differentiation of pluripotent mesenchymal cells into active osteoblasts, Furlan et al.99. Furlan JC, Perrin RG, Govender PV, Petrenko Y, Massicotte EM, Rampersaud YR, et al. Use of osteogenic protein-1 in patients at high risk for spinal pseudarthrosis: a prospective cohort study assessing safety, health- related quality of life, and radiographic fusion. J Neurosurg Spine. 2007;7(5):486-95. concludes that it can induce a stable, mature, posterolateral spinal fusion mass more rapidly than an autologous bone graft, and the resulting fusion mass may be biomechanically stiffer in the early stages (up to 3 months) of healing.

BMP had a 98% vs. ICBG 76% of fusion rate, once been extended its use to off label posterior spinal fusion, anterior/posterior cervical fusion. To Mulconrey et al.11. Mulconrey DS, Bridwell KH, Flynn J, Cronen GA, Rose PS. Bone Morphogenetic Protein (RhBMP-2) as a substitute for iliac crest bone graft in multilevel adult spinal deformity surgery: minimum two- year evaluation of fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008;33(20):2153-9. at a single level research of 2 years, BMP demonstrate a superior posterolateral spinal fusion rate (88%) than ICBG (73%). Those patients had decreased blood loss, shorter length of surgery and shorter hospital stay.11. Mulconrey DS, Bridwell KH, Flynn J, Cronen GA, Rose PS. Bone Morphogenetic Protein (RhBMP-2) as a substitute for iliac crest bone graft in multilevel adult spinal deformity surgery: minimum two- year evaluation of fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008;33(20):2153-9.;1010. Lu DC, Tumialán LM, Chou D. Multilevel anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with and without rhBMP-2: a comparison of dysphagia rates and outcomes in 150 patients - clinical article. J Neurosurg Spine . 2013;18(1):43-9. According to Hoffmann et al.55. Hoffmann MF, Jones CB, Sietsema DL. Complications of rhBMP-2 utilization for posterolateral lumbar fusions requiring reoperation: a single practice, retrospective case series report. Spine J . 2013;13(10):1244-52. rhBMP-2 is more effective with a reduction in radiographic nonunion compared with BMP-7, demineralized bone matrix, and activated growth factor.

It must be evaluated all the variables in the spinal fusion, the detrimental factors to fusion are medical comorbidities, tobacco use, preoperative pseudarthrosis, preoperative laminectomy, age, increasing number of surgical levels. Others are osteoporosis, minimal local bone graft, previous and long fusion.1 Failures have been attributed to poor vascularity of a scarred fusion bed and persistence of systemic inhibitors, such as nicotine.1111. White AP, Maak TG, Prince D, Vaccaro AR, Albert TJ, Hilibrand AS, et al. Osteogenic protein-1 induced gene expression: evaluation in a posterolateral spinal pseudarthrosis model. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) . 2006;31(22):2550-5. To Furlan et al.99. Furlan JC, Perrin RG, Govender PV, Petrenko Y, Massicotte EM, Rampersaud YR, et al. Use of osteogenic protein-1 in patients at high risk for spinal pseudarthrosis: a prospective cohort study assessing safety, health- related quality of life, and radiographic fusion. J Neurosurg Spine. 2007;7(5):486-95. the population at risk for a spinal nonunion are patients with connective tissue disorders, individuals with a history of major diseases that could adversely affect bone healing, patients receiving medications that negatively affect bone healing, patients with a history of previous nonunion fusions, and/or patients with limited availability or poor quality of autogenous bone graft.

Singh et al.44. Singh K, Nandyala SV, Marquez- Lara A, Cha TD, Khan SN, Fineberg SJ, et al. Clinical sequelae after rhBMP-2 use in a minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. Spine J . 2013;13(9):1118-25. and Hsu et al.1212. Hsu WK, Polavarapu M, Riaz R, Roc GC, Stock SR, Glicksman ZS, et al. Nanocomposite therapy as a more efficacious and less inflammatory alternative to bone morphogenetic protein-2 in a rodent arthrodesis model. J Orthop Res. 2011;29(12):1812-9. emphasizes that applying BMP is not without risk, the FDA in 2008 issued a public health warning to its use in cervical spine fusion alerting to wound complications, dysphonia, dysphagia and ectopic bone formation. In the lumbar spine, reports have demonstrated radiculitis, pseudarthrosis, seroma/hematoma formation, and heterotopic ossification with rhBMP-2 use. Apprehension about its pro-oncogenic potential has limited its use in the pediatric population, although this trend may be changing.22. Dagostino PR, Whitmore RG, Smith GA, Maltenfort MG, Ratliff JK. Impact of bone morphogenetic proteins on frequency of revision surgery, use of autograft bone, and total hospital charges in surgery for lumbar degenerative disease: review of the nationwide inpatient sample from 2002 to 2008. Spine J. 2014;14(1):20-30.;55. Hoffmann MF, Jones CB, Sietsema DL. Complications of rhBMP-2 utilization for posterolateral lumbar fusions requiring reoperation: a single practice, retrospective case series report. Spine J . 2013;13(10):1244-52.;1212. Hsu WK, Polavarapu M, Riaz R, Roc GC, Stock SR, Glicksman ZS, et al. Nanocomposite therapy as a more efficacious and less inflammatory alternative to bone morphogenetic protein-2 in a rodent arthrodesis model. J Orthop Res. 2011;29(12):1812-9. Both Singh et al.44. Singh K, Nandyala SV, Marquez- Lara A, Cha TD, Khan SN, Fineberg SJ, et al. Clinical sequelae after rhBMP-2 use in a minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. Spine J . 2013;13(9):1118-25. and Hoffmann et al.55. Hoffmann MF, Jones CB, Sietsema DL. Complications of rhBMP-2 utilization for posterolateral lumbar fusions requiring reoperation: a single practice, retrospective case series report. Spine J . 2013;13(10):1244-52. groups theorizes that the lack of postoperative dead space in Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIFs) surgery may lead to an inflammatory state because of the high concentration of BMP-2, resulting in edema and seroma, theoretically inducing radiculitis, vertebral osteolysis and neuroforaminal bone growth.44. Singh K, Nandyala SV, Marquez- Lara A, Cha TD, Khan SN, Fineberg SJ, et al. Clinical sequelae after rhBMP-2 use in a minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. Spine J . 2013;13(9):1118-25.;55. Hoffmann MF, Jones CB, Sietsema DL. Complications of rhBMP-2 utilization for posterolateral lumbar fusions requiring reoperation: a single practice, retrospective case series report. Spine J . 2013;13(10):1244-52.

Pyogenic vertebral osteomyelitis is one of less common complications after spinal fusion, present late or in patients with multiple medical morbidities such as diabetes, HIV or rheumatoid conditions; the use of BMPs to correct this hostile environment of pyogenic infection it is proven effective managed by circumferential instrumented fusion in combination with antibiotics, according to Allen et al.1313. Allen RT, Lee Y, Stimson E, Garfin SR. Bone morphogenetic protein-2 (BMP-2) in the treatment of pyogenic vertebral osteomyelitis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) . 2007;32(26): 2996-3006. it has good evidence of bony fusion, no infection recurrence and the patients had clinical improvement.

Hoffmann et al.55. Hoffmann MF, Jones CB, Sietsema DL. Complications of rhBMP-2 utilization for posterolateral lumbar fusions requiring reoperation: a single practice, retrospective case series report. Spine J . 2013;13(10):1244-52. affirms that there is no significant authentic immunologic antibody response to rhBMP-2 or type I bovine collagen, and the reexposure does not lead to a symptomatic antibody formation according to serology testing.

Pseudoarthrosis occur when the fusion attempt fails, a solid fusion is not achieved, or there is motion across the segment leading to it, and it can be clinically symptomatic as pain, deformity, neurocompression or hardware failure. The risks factors are: osteoporosis, cervical kyphotic deformity, revision fusion surgery, multilevel surgery, or a history of smoking.10 Adogwa et al.14 suggests that revision surgery of lumbar arthrodesis for symptomatic pseudarthrosis is a viable treatment that improves low-back pain, disability and quality of life. Pseudarthrosis after spine fusion leads to poor clinical outcomes and a significant cost to patients and the healthcare system.1212. Hsu WK, Polavarapu M, Riaz R, Roc GC, Stock SR, Glicksman ZS, et al. Nanocomposite therapy as a more efficacious and less inflammatory alternative to bone morphogenetic protein-2 in a rodent arthrodesis model. J Orthop Res. 2011;29(12):1812-9.

The study of Lu et al.1010. Lu DC, Tumialán LM, Chou D. Multilevel anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with and without rhBMP-2: a comparison of dysphagia rates and outcomes in 150 patients - clinical article. J Neurosurg Spine . 2013;18(1):43-9. says it is interesting to note that a majority (63%) of the allograft cohort patients who exhibited pseudarthrosis were smokers, whereas all the patients who were in the BMP group had a solid fusion regardless of smoking status. The use of rhBMP-2 appears to reduce the risk of pseudarthrosis, but this benefit is most pronounced in patients treated with 4-level anterior cervical discectomy fusion (ACDF) who are smokers.

Pseudoarthrosis is one of the most common complications after long adult spinal fusion to the sacrum and typically occurs at the thoracolumbar and lumbosacral junctions.1515. Kim HJ, Buchowski JM, Zebala LP, Dickson DD, Koester L, Bridwell KH. RhBMP-2 Is superior to iliac crest bone graft for long fusions to the sacrum in adult spinal deformity. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) . 2013;38(14):1209-15. Is a major limitation of multilevel anterior cervical fusion, traditional techniques have a 20% of patients who develop pseudarthrosis, one strategy used to help decrease the rate of it is to have posterior instrumentation to increase the rigidity of the construct, however it adds morbidity by increase the time of surgery. Frenkel et al.1616. Frenkel MB, Cahill KS, Javahary RJ, Zacur G, Green BA, Levi AD. Fusion rates in multilevel, instrumented anterior cervical fusion for degenerative disease with and without the use of bone morphogenetic protein. J Neurosurg Spine . 2013;18(3):269-73. demonstrate that BMP usage in anterior cervical approach has almost 100% rate of solid arthrodesis regardless of level, but its study does not have statistical significance.

According to Singh et al.44. Singh K, Nandyala SV, Marquez- Lara A, Cha TD, Khan SN, Fineberg SJ, et al. Clinical sequelae after rhBMP-2 use in a minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. Spine J . 2013;13(9):1118-25. 6.8% of patients who underwent a MIS-TLIF procedure were identified as having pseudarthrosis, they all were clinically symptomatic and underwent a revision arthrodesis - a contralateral MIS-TLIF. Patients with revision surgery because of pseudarthrosis are younger than those who did not have a revision (p < .001), it is a group of patients with a high prevalence of smokers compared with the ones who did not need revision (41.3% vs. 26.7%, p < .054). The need for review procedure for those patients costs an average of $20,267 (American dollars) of hospital direct costs and physician charges.

Pseudarthrosis at L5-S1 is one of the most common complications of long fusions to the sacrum in adult deformity surgery. Strategies for decreasing it include interbody fusion, use of BMP-2 at the lumbosacral junction, and the use of sacro-pelvic fixation, individually or in combination.1717. Annis P, Brodke DS, Spiker WR, Daubs MD, Lawrence BD. The fate of L5-S1 with low-dose BMP-2 and pelvic fixation, with or without interbody fusion, in adult deformity surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) . 2015;40(11):E634-9. The repair in the lumbar spine presents a challenging surgical problem with high failure rates been reported, resulting from poor vascularity in a scarred fusion bed, inadequate posterior bony surface area, loss of sagittal alignment, and exposure to adverse systemic factors such as nicotine. Higher fusion rates were noted with rhBMP-7 than autograft in this setting (82% vs. 42%) in those cases. Another potential bone graft alternative that has been extensively studied is rhBMP-2, demonstrated by Lawrence et al.1818. Lawrence JP, Waked W, Gillon TJ, White AP, Spock CR, Biswas D, et al. rhBMP-2 (ACS and CRM formulations) overcomes pseudarthrosis in a New Zealand white rabbit posterolateral fusion model. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) . 2007;32(11): 1206-13. to overcome the inhibitory effects of nicotine in a model of primary spinal fusion and appears to be an effective alternative in its preclinical model for a scenario with innumerous risk factors for pseudarthrosis repair.

Future studies should be conducted to elucidate the underlying control over the observed gene expression involved in pseudarthrosis, the expression of certain osteogenic and angiogenic genes that have been previously demonstrated to be inhibited by nicotine. For the White et al.1111. White AP, Maak TG, Prince D, Vaccaro AR, Albert TJ, Hilibrand AS, et al. Osteogenic protein-1 induced gene expression: evaluation in a posterolateral spinal pseudarthrosis model. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) . 2006;31(22):2550-5. model it had up-regulation in the implantation of osteogenic protein-1 at the pseudarthrosis site. Gene expression data supported the hypothesis that the discrepancy in fusion success may be due to osteogenic protein-1's ability to up-regulate osteogenic and angiogenic cytokines required for fusion, and, thus, overcome nicotine's inhibition of local gene expression.

According to Mulconrey et al.11. Mulconrey DS, Bridwell KH, Flynn J, Cronen GA, Rose PS. Bone Morphogenetic Protein (RhBMP-2) as a substitute for iliac crest bone graft in multilevel adult spinal deformity surgery: minimum two- year evaluation of fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008;33(20):2153-9. rhBMP-2 has the ability to create solid fusion in the presence of negative variables and in multilevel spinal fusion, eliminating the necessity for iliac crest bone graft, to Hoffmann et al.55. Hoffmann MF, Jones CB, Sietsema DL. Complications of rhBMP-2 utilization for posterolateral lumbar fusions requiring reoperation: a single practice, retrospective case series report. Spine J . 2013;13(10):1244-52. non-union rates in lumbar spine fusion with rhBMP-2 are low, a high dosage (>12 mg) is associated with higher chance of postoperative seroma and infection requiring invasive intervention, such as reutilization of it.

Frenkel et al.1616. Frenkel MB, Cahill KS, Javahary RJ, Zacur G, Green BA, Levi AD. Fusion rates in multilevel, instrumented anterior cervical fusion for degenerative disease with and without the use of bone morphogenetic protein. J Neurosurg Spine . 2013;18(3):269-73. indicates that cervical fusion approach with BMP its possible without increase in complication rates if using lower doses of BMP, following the safety concern of the FDA notification, any multilevel anterior cervical procedure, even without BMP, can lead to dysphagia and airway problems. Although according to Lu et al.1010. Lu DC, Tumialán LM, Chou D. Multilevel anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with and without rhBMP-2: a comparison of dysphagia rates and outcomes in 150 patients - clinical article. J Neurosurg Spine . 2013;18(1):43-9. the use of rhBMP-2 in patients undergoing 2-level ACDF significantly increases the severity of dysphagia, without affecting the overall incidence of it. MIS-TLIFs showed neural compromise by a case series evaluated,11. Mulconrey DS, Bridwell KH, Flynn J, Cronen GA, Rose PS. Bone Morphogenetic Protein (RhBMP-2) as a substitute for iliac crest bone graft in multilevel adult spinal deformity surgery: minimum two- year evaluation of fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008;33(20):2153-9. although rhBMP-2 is effective for arthrodesis in the unilateral MIS-TLIF the complication of this off-label usage are present - neuroforaminal bone growth, osteolysis and pseudarthrosis.44. Singh K, Nandyala SV, Marquez- Lara A, Cha TD, Khan SN, Fineberg SJ, et al. Clinical sequelae after rhBMP-2 use in a minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. Spine J . 2013;13(9):1118-25.

Kim et al.1515. Kim HJ, Buchowski JM, Zebala LP, Dickson DD, Koester L, Bridwell KH. RhBMP-2 Is superior to iliac crest bone graft for long fusions to the sacrum in adult spinal deformity. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) . 2013;38(14):1209-15. confirms that BMP is superior to ICBG in achieving fusion in long constructs in adult deformity surgery. The rate of pseudarthrosis was significantly higher in the ICBG group than BMP group, the concentration and dosage of rhBMP-2 used seems to have an effect on the rate of fusion and pseudarthrosis rate because no patient receiving more than 5 mg per level had apparent or detected pseudarthrosis (n = 20/20).

To Buttermann1919. Buttermann GR. Prospective nonrandomized comparison of an allograft with bone morphogenic protein versus an iliac- crest autograft in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. Spine J . 2008;8(3):426-35. (2008) BMP seems to have greater indication in patients having three- or greater-level ACDF, patients who are undergoing revision, patients who have morbid obesity or diabetics and are at risk of bone graft site complications, and patients who have osteoporosis in which the iliac-crest bone graft itself may be subject to collapse or exhibits a risk of subsidence.

Veillete and McKee66. Veillette CJH, McKee MD. Growth factors - BMPs, DBMs, and buffy coat products: are there any proven differences amongst them? Injury. 2007;38 Suppl. 1:S38-48. agree that for lumbar spine fusion the use of BMP showed an increased fusion rate, with a decrease of revision procedures in the same period, but it has no correlation with decrease in the use of ICBG and the use of BMP correlates with substantial increase in hospital chargers. It may question financial justification. Kim et al.1515. Kim HJ, Buchowski JM, Zebala LP, Dickson DD, Koester L, Bridwell KH. RhBMP-2 Is superior to iliac crest bone graft for long fusions to the sacrum in adult spinal deformity. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) . 2013;38(14):1209-15. justify that for long fusions to the sacrum BMP use significantly decreases pseudarthrosis rates in this patient population when compared with ICBG alone. Which corroborates with Annis et al.1717. Annis P, Brodke DS, Spiker WR, Daubs MD, Lawrence BD. The fate of L5-S1 with low-dose BMP-2 and pelvic fixation, with or without interbody fusion, in adult deformity surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) . 2015;40(11):E634-9. study where the use of low dose of BMP-2 at the L5-S1 level in combination with sacro-pelvic fixation achieved satisfactory fusion rates in adult deformity surgery.

Currently, most of the burden of the increased costs is borne by the hospitals and surgeon providers. However, over the long term, the costs may be similar and have yet to be determined conclusively.1919. Buttermann GR. Prospective nonrandomized comparison of an allograft with bone morphogenic protein versus an iliac- crest autograft in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. Spine J . 2008;8(3):426-35. The future market for BMP-2 in lumbar fusion surgery will depend on the clinical significance of increased fusion in the context of possible side effects and cost considerations, as well as the potential arrival of newer and safer fusion-promoting agents.2020. Mannion RJ, Nowitzke AM, Wood MJ. Promoting fusion in minimally invasive lumbar interbody stabilization with low-dose bone morphogenic protein-2 - but what is the cost? Spine J . 2011;11(6):527-33. To Frenkel et al.1616. Frenkel MB, Cahill KS, Javahary RJ, Zacur G, Green BA, Levi AD. Fusion rates in multilevel, instrumented anterior cervical fusion for degenerative disease with and without the use of bone morphogenetic protein. J Neurosurg Spine . 2013;18(3):269-73. the BMP-group has a faster fusion progress in a 3-month follow-up than in non-BMP group.

The efficacy of TLIF with BMP is supported in the large series with long-term follow-up of Crandal et al.2121. Crandall DG, Revella J, Patterson J, Huish E, Chang M, McLemore R. Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with rhBMP-2 in spinal deformity, spondylolisthesis, and degenerative disease - part 1: large series diagnosis related outcomes and complications with 2- to 9 -year follow- up. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) . 2013;38(13):1128-36. Reliable fusion and improved outcomes can be expected in adults undergoing TLIF for deformity, spondylolisthesis, and degenerative disease. Most complications occurred in patients with deformity.

Furlan et al.99. Furlan JC, Perrin RG, Govender PV, Petrenko Y, Massicotte EM, Rampersaud YR, et al. Use of osteogenic protein-1 in patients at high risk for spinal pseudarthrosis: a prospective cohort study assessing safety, health- related quality of life, and radiographic fusion. J Neurosurg Spine. 2007;7(5):486-95. results suggest that the use of rhBMP-7 is safe and may contribute to high fusion rates, as demonstrated by radiographs, reduced levels of disability, and improved quality of life in patients considered to be at a high risk for developing a nonunion after spinal reconstructive surgery. At Theologis et al.2222. Theologis AA, Tabaraee E, Lin T, Lubicky J, Diab M. Type of bone graft or substitute does not affect outcome of spine fusion with instrumentation for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) . 2015;40(17):1345-51. study shows no difference in outcomes between autogenous iliac crest, allogeneic bone graft, and bone substitutes in primary posterior spine fusion with instrumentation in idiopathic scoliosis. This study contributes to the growing body of evidence that rhBMP-7 is safe for surgical use in the clinical arena. The use of an rhBMP-7 implant may be a contributing factor to the elevated rate of radiographic fusion, improved quality of life, and reduced degree of disability after spinal fusion that was observed in its group of patients at a high risk for developing pseudarthrosis. It does not confer additional benefit when bone fusion is likely to occur in a normal fashion; however, in patients with one or more risk factors for impaired bone healing, the adjuvant use of it may negate these effects, allowing adequate bone fusion to occur.

Crandall et al.2323. Crandall DG, Revella J, Patterson J, Huish E, Chang M, McLemore R. Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with rhBMP-2 in spinal deformity, spondylolisthesis, and degenerative disease - part 2: BMP dosage- related complications and long-term outcomes in 509 patients. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) . 2013;38(13):1137-45. five-year follow-up after TLIF with BMP, confirms effective arthrodesis in short and long fusions, both primary and revision surgeries. Most complications occurred in deformity patients, the BMP-related ones (seroma, ectopic bone) were rare.

Even with very low dose BMP used in the study of Mannion et al.2020. Mannion RJ, Nowitzke AM, Wood MJ. Promoting fusion in minimally invasive lumbar interbody stabilization with low-dose bone morphogenic protein-2 - but what is the cost? Spine J . 2011;11(6):527-33. complications related to BMP usage were not avoided completely, it was observed asymptomatic heterotopic ossification and two cases of perineural cyst formation, one of whom required revision. Hoffmann et al.55. Hoffmann MF, Jones CB, Sietsema DL. Complications of rhBMP-2 utilization for posterolateral lumbar fusions requiring reoperation: a single practice, retrospective case series report. Spine J . 2013;13(10):1244-52. points out the need of additional research to determine dose dependency and genetic predisposition to react to BMPs, such as over (ectopic bone and seroma) or underreaction (nonunion).

Final remarks

Our review shows that the use of BMPs is effective and secure compared to ICGB, but depending of the location of usage (cervical spine, lumbar spine or sacrum) and the medical status of the patient (presence of comorbidities, tobacco usage) its more probable to exhibit complications, such as neuroforaminal bone growth, osteolysis, pseudarthrosis, seroma, hematoma. This data determine that the usage of BMPs must be an agreement between patient and physician, an informed decision discussing the benefits and risks of BMP for each case.

References

  • 1
    Mulconrey DS, Bridwell KH, Flynn J, Cronen GA, Rose PS. Bone Morphogenetic Protein (RhBMP-2) as a substitute for iliac crest bone graft in multilevel adult spinal deformity surgery: minimum two- year evaluation of fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008;33(20):2153-9.
  • 2
    Dagostino PR, Whitmore RG, Smith GA, Maltenfort MG, Ratliff JK. Impact of bone morphogenetic proteins on frequency of revision surgery, use of autograft bone, and total hospital charges in surgery for lumbar degenerative disease: review of the nationwide inpatient sample from 2002 to 2008. Spine J. 2014;14(1):20-30.
  • 3
    Lina IA, Puvanesarajah V, Liauw JA, Lo S-L, Santiago-Dieppa DR, Hwang L, et al. Quantitative study of parathyroid hormone (1-34) and bone morphogenetic protein-2 on spinal fusion outcomes in a rabbit model of lumbar dorsolateral intertransverse process arthrodesis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) . 2014;39(5):347-55.
  • 4
    Singh K, Nandyala SV, Marquez- Lara A, Cha TD, Khan SN, Fineberg SJ, et al. Clinical sequelae after rhBMP-2 use in a minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. Spine J . 2013;13(9):1118-25.
  • 5
    Hoffmann MF, Jones CB, Sietsema DL. Complications of rhBMP-2 utilization for posterolateral lumbar fusions requiring reoperation: a single practice, retrospective case series report. Spine J . 2013;13(10):1244-52.
  • 6
    Veillette CJH, McKee MD. Growth factors - BMPs, DBMs, and buffy coat products: are there any proven differences amongst them? Injury. 2007;38 Suppl. 1:S38-48.
  • 7
    Nandyala SV, Marquez- Lara A, Fineberg SJ, Pelton M, Singh K. Prospective, randomized, controlled trial of silicate-substituted calcium phosphate versus rhBMP-2 in a minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) . 2014;39(3):185-91.
  • 8
    Klimo P Jr, Peelle MW. Use of polyetheretherketone spacer and recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 in the cervical spine: a radiographic analysis. Spine J . 2009;9(12):959-66.
  • 9
    Furlan JC, Perrin RG, Govender PV, Petrenko Y, Massicotte EM, Rampersaud YR, et al. Use of osteogenic protein-1 in patients at high risk for spinal pseudarthrosis: a prospective cohort study assessing safety, health- related quality of life, and radiographic fusion. J Neurosurg Spine. 2007;7(5):486-95.
  • 10
    Lu DC, Tumialán LM, Chou D. Multilevel anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with and without rhBMP-2: a comparison of dysphagia rates and outcomes in 150 patients - clinical article. J Neurosurg Spine . 2013;18(1):43-9.
  • 11
    White AP, Maak TG, Prince D, Vaccaro AR, Albert TJ, Hilibrand AS, et al. Osteogenic protein-1 induced gene expression: evaluation in a posterolateral spinal pseudarthrosis model. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) . 2006;31(22):2550-5.
  • 12
    Hsu WK, Polavarapu M, Riaz R, Roc GC, Stock SR, Glicksman ZS, et al. Nanocomposite therapy as a more efficacious and less inflammatory alternative to bone morphogenetic protein-2 in a rodent arthrodesis model. J Orthop Res. 2011;29(12):1812-9.
  • 13
    Allen RT, Lee Y, Stimson E, Garfin SR. Bone morphogenetic protein-2 (BMP-2) in the treatment of pyogenic vertebral osteomyelitis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) . 2007;32(26): 2996-3006.
  • 14
    Adogwa O, Parker SL, Shau D, Mendelhall SK, Cheng J, Aaronson O, et al. Long -term outcomes of revision fusion for lumbar pseudarthrosis: clinical article. J Neurosurg Spine . 2011;15(4):393-8.
  • 15
    Kim HJ, Buchowski JM, Zebala LP, Dickson DD, Koester L, Bridwell KH. RhBMP-2 Is superior to iliac crest bone graft for long fusions to the sacrum in adult spinal deformity. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) . 2013;38(14):1209-15.
  • 16
    Frenkel MB, Cahill KS, Javahary RJ, Zacur G, Green BA, Levi AD. Fusion rates in multilevel, instrumented anterior cervical fusion for degenerative disease with and without the use of bone morphogenetic protein. J Neurosurg Spine . 2013;18(3):269-73.
  • 17
    Annis P, Brodke DS, Spiker WR, Daubs MD, Lawrence BD. The fate of L5-S1 with low-dose BMP-2 and pelvic fixation, with or without interbody fusion, in adult deformity surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) . 2015;40(11):E634-9.
  • 18
    Lawrence JP, Waked W, Gillon TJ, White AP, Spock CR, Biswas D, et al. rhBMP-2 (ACS and CRM formulations) overcomes pseudarthrosis in a New Zealand white rabbit posterolateral fusion model. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) . 2007;32(11): 1206-13.
  • 19
    Buttermann GR. Prospective nonrandomized comparison of an allograft with bone morphogenic protein versus an iliac- crest autograft in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. Spine J . 2008;8(3):426-35.
  • 20
    Mannion RJ, Nowitzke AM, Wood MJ. Promoting fusion in minimally invasive lumbar interbody stabilization with low-dose bone morphogenic protein-2 - but what is the cost? Spine J . 2011;11(6):527-33.
  • 21
    Crandall DG, Revella J, Patterson J, Huish E, Chang M, McLemore R. Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with rhBMP-2 in spinal deformity, spondylolisthesis, and degenerative disease - part 1: large series diagnosis related outcomes and complications with 2- to 9 -year follow- up. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) . 2013;38(13):1128-36.
  • 22
    Theologis AA, Tabaraee E, Lin T, Lubicky J, Diab M. Type of bone graft or substitute does not affect outcome of spine fusion with instrumentation for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) . 2015;40(17):1345-51.
  • 23
    Crandall DG, Revella J, Patterson J, Huish E, Chang M, McLemore R. Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with rhBMP-2 in spinal deformity, spondylolisthesis, and degenerative disease - part 2: BMP dosage- related complications and long-term outcomes in 509 patients. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) . 2013;38(13):1137-45.
  • Work performed at the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital Dom Hélder Câmara, Recife, PE, Brazil.

Publication Dates

  • Publication in this collection
    Mar-Apr 2017

History

  • Received
    05 Feb 2016
  • Accepted
    07 Mar 2016
Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia Al. Lorena, 427 14º andar, 01424-000 São Paulo - SP - Brasil, Tel.: 55 11 2137-5400 - São Paulo - SP - Brazil
E-mail: rbo@sbot.org.br