SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.34 issue2Considerations about the Bibliometric Impact Factor. The BJCVS is on the Right TrackPostoperative Metabolic, Inflammation, and Atrial Fibrillation Control: a Relentless Battle author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

Share


Brazilian Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery

Print version ISSN 0102-7638On-line version ISSN 1678-9741

Braz. J. Cardiovasc. Surg. vol.34 no.2 São José do Rio Preto Mar./Apr. 2019

http://dx.doi.org/10.21470/1678-9741-2019-0090 

EDITORIAL

The SBCCV/SBCEC Standards and Guidelines for Perfusion Practice: A Landmark for Cardiopulmonary Bypass in Brazil

Gabriel Romero Liguori1  , MD
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8089-1477

1Laboratório de Cirurgia Cardiovascular e Fisiopatologia da Circulação (LIM-11), Instituto do Coração (InCor), Hospital das Clínicas HCFMUSP, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.

Since Gibbon successfully performed, in 1953, the first cardiac surgery under cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB), the technology became one of the most important pillars of cardiac surgery. In Brazil, the history of CPB begins with Dr. Hugo João Felipozzi. Felipozzi led the research that culminated in the construction of the first CPB machine produced in Brazil and the first open heart surgery in the country, in 1956, only three years after Gibbon's feat[1,2]. By the same time, Prof. Euryclides de Jesus Zerbini was leading the creation of a CPB workshop ("Oficina Coração-Pulmão Artificial") at the Clinics Hospital of the University of São Paulo Medical School (HCFMUSP), aiming the manufacture and maintenance of CPB machines and instruments[3]. This workshop, which was also the fruit of Prof. Adib Domingos Jatene labor, became the seed to what is, nowadays, the Heart Institute (InCor-HCFMUSP).

Although current CPB machines do not strongly differ from the original model proposed by Gibbon and used by the Brazilian pioneers, during the last decades several improvements were proposed in order to promote better outcomes after cardiac surgery with CPB[4,5]. Despite the significant advances in CPB systems, complications leading to postoperative morbidity and mortality still occur. For this reason, the establishment of standards and guidelines is just as crucial for the successful implementation of CPB as the scientific breakthroughs in the field.

The formulation and enforcement of such standards and guidelines is a fundamental responsibility of medical societies. In the current issue of the Brazilian Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery (BJCVS), the Department for Mechanical Circulatory Assistance (DECAM) of the Brazilian Society for Cardiovascular Surgery (SBCCV) and the Brazilian Society for Extracorporeal Circulation (SBCEC) jointly propose standards and guidelines for the perfusion practice in Brazil[6] The initiative is an international collaborative effort to propose the phased adoption of the American Society of Extracorporeal Technology's (AmSECT) recommendations in our country and serve as a compass for programs striving to improve perfusion processes[7]. The document focuses on the empowerment of perfusion as a profession with a focus on professional qualification and education standards, the standardization of perfusion practices, the establishment of mandatory safety devices, and the importance of non-technical skills and patient-centered teamwork.

The SBCCV/SBCEC Standards and Guidelines for Perfusion Practice are divided into two parts. The first, "Minimum Standards For Perfusion Practice in Brazil", lists seven standards identified as the minimum recommendation for perfusion practice. This section was developed as an outgrowth of an ongoing collaboration with the International Quality Improvement Collaborative for Congenital Heart Surgery (IQIC). The second, "Comprehensive Standards and Guidelines for Perfusion Practice in Brazil", was strongly based on the Report from AmSECT's, International Consortium for Evidence-Based Perfusion American Society of ExtraCorporeal Technology Standards and Guidelines for Perfusion Practice [8] and modified according to the Brazilian regulatory agencies' policies and recommendations. The first part of the document is a ready-to-implement set of practices which should be immediately adopted by all centers performing cardiac surgery. The second is a collection of in-depth practices to be adopted in the coming years by these same centers.

One of the most important efforts of Dr. Luiz Fernando Caneo and his colleagues while writing the document was to translate it to Portuguese. The translated version of the SBCCV/SBCEC Standards and Guidelines for Perfusion Practice will allow hundreds to thousands of perfusion professionals, which are not always familiarized with the English language, to read, understand, and apply the proposed recommendations. This effort will certainly impact the way these professionals perform their work and holds the potential to influence the culture and set new paradigms in the field. Hence, the document, although published in the English language, is accompanied by an annex containing the Portuguese version.

The Brazilian Society for Cardiovascular Surgery and the Brazilian Society for Extracorporeal Circulation endorse this document as their official position in regard to perfusion practices and strongly recommend its adoption at the earliest by all the centers performing cardiac surgery in Brazil.

REFERENCES

1 Leirner AA, Puig LB. Brazilian pioneers in artificial organs and heart surgery. Artif Organs. 2012 Jan;36(1):11-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1594.2011.01426.x. [ Links ]

2 Gomes WJ, Saba JC, Buffolo E. 50 anos de circulação extracorpórea no Brasil: Hugo J. Felipozzi, o pioneiro da circulação extracorpórea no Brasil. Rev Bras Cir Cardiovasc [Internet]. 2005 Dec [cited 2019 Mar 07];20(4):iii-viii. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0102-76382005000400002. [ Links ]

3 Stolf NAG, Braile DM. Euryclides de Jesus Zerbini: uma biografia. Rev Bras Circ Cardiovasc [Internet]. 2012 [cited 2019 Mar 07];27(1):137-47. Available from: http://www.scielo.br/pdf/rbccv/v27n1/v27n1a20.pdfLinks ]

4 Liguori GR, Kanas AF, Moreira LF. Managing the inflammatory response after cardiopulmonary bypass: review of the studies in animal models. Rev Bras Cir Cardiovasc. 2014 Jan-Mar;29(1):93-102. [ Links ]

5 Jameel S, Colah S, Klein AA. Recent advances in cardiopulmonary bypass techniques. Cont Educ Anaesth Crit Care Pain [Internet]. 2010 Feb [cited 2019 Mar 07];10(1):20-3. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1093/bjaceaccp/mkp042Links ]

6 Caneo LF, Matte G, Groom R, Neirotti RA, Pêgo-Fernandes PM, Mejia JAC, et al. The Brazilian Society for Cardiovascular Surgery (SBCCV) and Brazilian Society for Extracorporeal Circulation (SBCEC) Standards and Guidelines for Perfusion Practice. Braz J Cardiovasc Surg.2019;34(2):239-60. doi: 10.21470/1678-9741-2018-0347 [ Links ]

7 Matte GS. Global outreach to improve the provision of cardiopulmonary bypass for patients with congenital heart disease. Artif Organs. 2019 Jan;43(1):14-16. doi: 10.1111/aor.13374. [ Links ]

8 Baker RA, Bronson SL, Dickinson TA, Fitzgerald DC, Likosky DS, Mellas NB, et al. Report from AmSECT's International Consortium for Evidence-Based Perfusion: American Society of Extracorporeal Technology Standards and Guidelines for Perfusion Practice: 2013. J Extra Corpor Technol. 2013 Sep;45(3):156-66. [ Links ]

Creative Commons License This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.