SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.20 issue6Assessment of staging, prognosis and mortality of colorectal cancer by tumor markers: receptor erbB-2 and cadherinsOxidized tissue proteins after intestinal reperfusion injury in rats author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

  • English (pdf)
  • Article in xml format
  • How to cite this article
  • SciELO Analytics
  • Curriculum ScienTI
  • Automatic translation

Indicators

Related links

Share


Acta Cirurgica Brasileira

Print version ISSN 0102-8650On-line version ISSN 1678-2674

Acta Cir. Bras. vol.20 no.6 São Paulo Nov./Dec. 2005

https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-86502005000600006 

6 - ORIGINAL ARTICLE

 

Effects of different preservation temperatures and periods menisci cellularity in rabbits1

 

Efeitos de diferentes temperaturas e períodos de preservação na celularidade de meniscos em coelhos

 

 

Leandro José ReckersI; Djalma José FagundesII; Moisés CohenIII; José Luiz Pozzo RaymundoIV; Márcia Bento MoreiraV; Vanessa Carla PaivaVI

IPost-Graduated. Doctorate Degree
IIPhD Department of Surgery, São Paulo Federal University - SP Brazil
IIIPhD Department of Orthopedics, São Paulo Federal University-SP Brazil
IVPhD Department of Orthopedics, Pelotas Federal University –RS – Brazil
VVeterinary from Surgery and Experimentation Post-Graduate Program, São Paulo Federal University – SP – Brazil

Correspondence

 

 


ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Quantify the progressive decrease of the cellular viability of rabbit meniscus preserved for transplants over a 30 day period at different freezing temperatures.
METHODS:
180 menisci were removed from 45 rabbits. Menisci were frozen from 2 to 30 days at -7.2°Celsius -21.4°Celsius and -73°Celsius. Four menisci from each temperature were thawed every two days and the number of present cells was quantified.
RESULTS: On the 14th freezing day at –7.2°Celsius, there were 92.38% mean viable cells. However, as from the 16th day, there has been a significant 12% decrease (p = 0.001), as compared to 14th day mean. Mean cell viability at -21.4°Celsius and -73ºCelsius, until the 16th day was statistically similar. As from the 18th day at -21.4°Celsius, there has been significant cell count decrease (p < 0.001), especially from the 28th (54.5%) to the 30th (30%) freezing day. The number of viable cells at -73 0Celsius has shown insignificant 2.3% decrease (p = 1.000) from the 28th (40.2%) to the 30th (37.9%) day.
CONCLUSION:
The amount of viable meniscus cells is similar up to the 14th day of preservation, under any of the used temperatures. However, from the 14th day to the 30th day, the amount of viable cells is smaller in lower temperatures.

Key words: Freezing. Meniscus. Transplantation. Rabbits.


RESUMO

OBJETIVO: Quantificar a diminuição progressiva da viabilidade celular de meniscos de coelhos preservados para transplantes durante trinta dias em três temperaturas diferentes de congelamento.
MÉTODOS:
Retirou-se 180 meniscos de 45 coelhos. Os meniscos foram congelados, de dois até trinta dias, a -7,2°Celsius -21,4°Celsius e -73°Celsius. A cada dois dias, de cada temperatura, foram descongelados quatro meniscos e quantificou-se o número de células presentes.
RESULTADOS:
No 14º dia de congelamento a -7,2°Celsius, a média de células viáveis foi de 92,38%. Entretanto, a partir do 16º dia observou-se uma redução significante de 12% (p=0,001), comparando-se com a média no 14° dia. A média da viabilidade celular, nas temperaturas -21,4°Celsius e -73ºCelsius, até 16º dia apresentou comportamento estatisticamente semelhante. A partir do 18º dia na temperatura de -21,4°Celsius a redução do número de células foi significante (p<0,001), especialmente do 28° (54,5%) para o 30° dia (30%) de congelamento. O número de células viáveis a -73°Celsius mostrou uma redução não significante (p=1,000) de 2,3% no número de células viáveis do 28° (40,2%) ao 30° dia (37,9%).
CONCLUSÃO:
A quantidade de células de meniscos viáveis é semelhante até o décimo quarto dia de preservação, em qualquer das três temperaturas testadas. No entanto, à partir deste período até o trigésimo dia a quantidade de células viáveis é menor nas temperaturas mais baixas.

Descritores: Congelamento. Meniscos. Transplante. Coelhos.


 

 

Introduction

Meniscal injuries, regardless of type, duration, physical activity or age, have been traditionally treated by total or partial removal1,2. In the impossibility of treating injured meniscus, and/or when its removal is imperative, the options are meniscal transplantation or meniscal prosthesis, still in the experimental stage2,3,4. A recent review has shown 86% to 91% satisfactory results in patients submitted to meniscal transplantation after meniscectomy5. Nevertheless, there is no consensus on the influence of transplanted meniscus cellularity – direct consequence of preservation on final outcomes. Different preservation techniques and storage periods have different effects on tissue biological and biochemical integrity5,6,7. Current menisci storage and preservation techniques are similar to other connective tissues and include: fresh method, fresh freezing, dry freezing and cryopreservation7,8,9,10,11,12. There are references in the literature on cell viability during frozen preservation of bones, ligaments and tendons13,14. A review of the subject could not find reports on frozen preservation of the meniscus itself. A cell viability study would provide more adequate guidance for the optimal moment to perform meniscal transplantations, both for those advocating the need for viable meniscal cells (frozen at minus 40 Celsius), and those advocating cell death (frozen as from minus 700 Celsius). So, our research aimed at evaluating the effects of three different freezing temperatures on meniscal cellularity of rabbits.

 

Methods

The experiment was evaluated and approved by the Research Ethics Committee, Universidade Federal de São Paulo – UNIFESP – EPM, protocol 0787/04 and involved 45 male albino rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculus,New Zealand strain), aged 6 to 8 months, mean weight 3250 grams, from which 180 meniscuses were aseptically collected (90 medial and 90 lateral). Specimens were randomly distributed in three groups: G I – Stored at minus 7.2º Celsius (n = 60); G II – stored at minus 21.4°Celsius (n = 60); G III – stored at minus 73°Celsius (n=60). Four specimens of each study group were sent for histological study every two days, from the 2nd to the 30th day.

Anesthetic procedure

Animals were premedicated with intramuscular 2.4 mg.Kg-1 acepromazine 1% and 4 mg.Kg-1 xilazine hydrochloride 2% in the same syringe (posterior thigh – semitendinous and semimembranosus muscles). Marginal auricular vein was used for 0.9% saline infusion, in addition to 0.5mL of anesthetic induction drugs (1:1 ketamine and xilazine). Animals were intubated with 2.5F tracheal tube without cuff. Anesthesia was maintained with 1.5% isoflurane in 2L/min constant flow with respiratory rate of 10 movements/min.

Surgical procedure

After tricotomy, procedure was started with anterior longitudinal knee incision of approximately 6cm; subcutaneous divulsion to expose medial articular capsule; and lateral patellar luxation. Mild valgus effort and knee flexion were enough to access and remove medial meniscus; total lateral meniscus removal was performed with varus effort, knee flexion, medial patellar luxation and tibial disinsertion of fibular collateral ligament. Surgery was completed by patellar luxation reduction and articular capsule, subcutaneous and skin suture with polyamide thread 4.0.

Material colleciton

Removed medial and lateral menisci were placed in small individual plastic bags sterilized with ethylene oxide, which were then placed in 6 x 9cm plastic jars also sterilized by the same method. Each set was immediately taken to storage in three different temperatures: minus 73º Celsius, minus 21.4°Celsius, and minus 7.2º Celsius.

Microscopic study

After the freezing period determined for each group, four menisci were removed from their freezers and maintained in room temperature for 20 minutes until complete thawing. Next, they were aseptically removed from their bags and immersed in individual bottles with 10% formalin, where they remained for 48 hours. Histological processing has included: longitudinal cross-section of the largest meniscus axis, specimens blocking with paraffin, section with rotating microtome adjusted to 4 mm thickness, preparation of blades and staining with hematoxylin-eosin (HE). Histological description and readings were performed by pathologist blind to the origin of the groups, who has evaluated the following cell types: fibroblasts, fibrocondrocytes, condrocytes and pyknosis (cell death). All randomly collected cell types were identified and counted for each sample. Histological plates were analyzed by computer image analysis system consisting of a Nikon FDX – 35 video camera coupled to a Nikon optic microscope (Eclipse 800), with multicolor objectives transmitting images to a Pentium MMX MHz PC with 64 megabytes of RAM, operating under Windows and equipped with digitizing board and Image-Pro Plus software.

Statistical analysis

Significance level 0.05 (a = 5%) was adopted in all statistical tests, and descriptive values (p) below this value were considered significant. Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) with one fixed factor was applied to the experiment at -7.2 0Celsius to evaluate differences between freezing periods (in days) and the percentage of viable cells. Differences were located by Bonferroni's multiple comparisons tests. Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) with two fixed factors was applied to experiments at -21.4ºCelsius and -73ºCelsius aiming at comparing both temperatures and evaluate differences between freezing times (in days) and percentage of viable cells. Polynomial Regression Analysis was applied to experiments at -21.4ºCelsius and -73ºCelsius with best curve adjustment for percentage of viable cells as a function of freezing time as from 16 days.

 

Results

Quality of cells studied from the 2nd to the 6th day was not significantly different in morphology, what could be confirmed by readings from 2nd (Figure 1), 8th (Figure 2) and 16th day (Figure 3). However, from the 26th to the 30th day (Figures. 4 and 5), changes are highly evident. Qualitative cell analysis has not shown predominance of changes among different cell types, so results of cell viability are presented altogether (Figure 1). As from the 6th observation day, curves presented behavior curves which were better evaluated by polynomial regression curves. Regression model was statistically significant (p < 0.001) with 89.7% explanation coefficient for -7.2º C (Figure 7), showing adequate adjustment; regression model was statistically significant (p < 0.001) with 94.7% explanation coefficient for -21.4º C (Figure 8), showing very good adjustment; and regression model was statistically significant (p < 0.001) with 97.1% explanation coefficient for -73º C (Figure 9), showing very good adjustment.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Discussion

Regardless of their origin, mechanism or extension, meniscal injuries are preferably treated aiming at restoring meniscus anatomic and functional integrity. Total or partial meniscus removal, when its restoration is unfeasible, is associated to joint degenerative processes which will invariably result in variable degrees of joint involvement10,12,13. So, the search for an alternative to this fibrocartilaginous tissue is still a challenge for orthopedic surgery. Homologous tissue replacement, that is, fibrocartilage of no beating donor or of multiple beating donors, has the advantage of using tissue morphologically similar to the tissue being replaced. Disadvantages are the possibility of the graft being a vector for infectious diseases and for tissue immune rejection processes14,15,16. The ideal would be a tissue which could maintain its physico-chemical profile and still be free from pathogenic agents. Simultaneously, this material would have to be prepared and stored for a reasonable period before being used. The fresh preservation method refers to menisci which, after removal, remain for 2 to 5 days at plus 40C, corresponding to typical home refrigerator temperature17,18,19,20. Limiting factor is the short period it is available for grafting. Deep freezing implies tissue storage and freezing at negative temperatures as from 00 Celsius. It is a simple and widely used method to preserve menisci. In reviewing biomedical literature, it has been observed that there is no consensus and consistent basis for choosing the preservation method, especially in terms of temperature and meniscus cell viability. We decided then to investigate, in experimental animal model, the effects of three different temperatures in meniscal cells survival. Group I results show that up to 16 days, mean cell preservation varied from 99.83% to 80.38% and that as from the 18th until the 30th day, there has been a sharper decrease. Even so, there were mean 34.85% viable cells at the end of the period (Figure 6). This may show that authors advocating fresh meniscus transplantation may be offering, if the model is applied to humans, a high number of cells with antigenic potential to the receptor. Rejection does not seem to be a problem, since very few blood vessels and matrix density are unfavorable factors for immune-rejection processes3. Groups II and III results show similar behavior until the 16th day in mean viable cells as compared to freezing at minus 21.4 or minus 730C (Figure 6). Figure 6 shows that curves with means and standard deviations are super imposable and may be analyzed as a single group. Based on this experimental model, this means that authors advocating freezing preservation may give up deep freezing (-73 0Celsius) since lower freezing temperatures (-21.4 0Celsius) lead to similar results. Figure 6 shows that mean viable cells has similarly decreased as compared to Group I, from the 2nd to the 16th day, varying from 97.63% to 83.68%. This means that meniscal transplantation in any of the three studied temperatures carries a considerable population of donor cells until the 16th day. As from the 18th until the 30th day, mean viable cells decrease was significantly higher in specimens submitted to deep freezing. Group II means were superimposed to Group I means, but were significantly lower as compared to Group III means. So, deep freezing provides lower viable cells means as compared to higher freezing temperatures. Notwithstanding this lower number of viable cells, they were still approximately 30% after 30 preservation days. Polynomial regression curves plotted as from collected data show this relationship in a clearer way (Figures. 7, 8 and 9). Cellularity decrease at the three temperatures until the 16th day is similar. Variations as from the 18th day are mild, however significant. Viability decrease in Group I is close to linear decrease, however significantly steeper as compared to Groups II and III. Decrease in Group III is linear, meaning a constant and equitable decrease day by day. In group III, this decrease is a second degree polynomial decrease, where there is constant viability decrease, but in lower numbers every day, with marked decrease only during the last observation days, when it is superimposed to levels observed for the other groups. Findings of this systematized cell viability study have no correspondence with any other study we could find in the literature. In general terms, this study allows us to conclude that, regardless of freezing method, cellularity decrease is similar until the 16th day with approximately 80% of viable cells. From the 18th to the 30th day, cellularity decrease varies according to the freezing method, but all end up with approximately 30% of viable cells. In addition to quantifying by cell count (condrocytes, fibrocondrocytes, fibroblasts and pyknosis) it was possible to follow qualitative morphological changes of the preserved meniscus. From 2 to 16 days, there were no significant changes on cell organization and structural arrangement, and pyknosis rate was low. As from the 18th day, changes became more evident with increased pyknosis and structural disarrangement of cell organization and composition. It was possible to identify tortuosity in fibrocondrocytes and fibroblasts organization, dissociation among cells filled by interstitial fluid or edema, and mild cell volume increase with loss of spindle shape. In summary, signs of cell necrosis by liquefaction have increased, leaving just the amorphous tissue corresponding to inorganic matrix. This study was just an evaluation to characterize remaining preserved menisci cells by hematoxylin eosin staining. This same material could be submitted to other methods, such as pricro-sirius red or polarization microscopy for collagen identification. Immune-histochemical methods may be used to identify and quantify inorganic matrix constituents. Research may continue investigating macroscopic and physico-chemical qualities of preserved menisci to evaluate tensile strength, deformation and breaking resistance. Matrix composition variation according to preservation period, measured by chondroitin-sulfuric acid or other elements is a feasible alternative to evaluate graft adequacy according to freezing methods. Apoptosis rate is also an alternative to evaluate the behavior of remaining cells to be transplanted to the donor. Remaining cells antigenic ability may be tested in "in vitro" or in animal models. Most attractive perspective is the study of preserved menisci to be submitted to homologous transplantation and evaluate graft re-population. The continuity of this research line opens perspectives for systematic investigation of preserved grafts, not only menisci, but also other connective tissues.

 

Conclusion

The amount of viable meniscus cells is similar up to the 14th day of preservation, under any of the used temperatures. However, from the 14th day to the 30th day, the amount of viable cells is smaller in lower temperatures.

 

References

1. Wirth CJ, Peters G, Milachowski KA, Weismeier KG, Kohn D. Long term results of meniscal allograft transplantation. Am J Sports Med. 2002;30(2):174-81.        [ Links ]

2. Sekiya JK, Giffin R, Irrgang JJ, Fu FH, Harner CD. Clinical outcomes after combined meniscal allograft transplantation and anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 2003;31(6):896-905.        [ Links ]

3. Rijk PC. Meniscal allograft part I: Background, results, graft selection, preservation, and surgical considerations. Arthroscopy. 2004;20(7):728-43.        [ Links ]

4. Hamlet W, Liu SH, Yang R. Destruction of a cryopreserved meniscal allograft: a case for acute rejection. Arthroscopy. 1997;13:517-21.        [ Links ]

5. Ellingson CI, Sekiya JK. Current opinion in meniscal allograft transplantation. Curr Opin Orthop. 2004;15(2):79-85.        [ Links ]

6. Peters G, Wirth CJ. The current state of meniscal allograft transplantation and replacement. Knee. 2003;10:19-31.        [ Links ]

7. Fabbriciani C, Lucania L, Milano G, Pannia AS, Evangelisti M. Meniscal allografts cryopreservation vs deep frozen technique. An experimental study in goats. Arthrocopy. 1997;5:124-34.        [ Links ]

8. Friedman MD. Meniscal Allografts. Arthroscopy. 2003;18:33-9.        [ Links ]

9. Tom JA, Rodeo SA. Soft tissue allografts for knee reconstruction in sports medicine. Clin Orthop. 2002;(402):135-56.        [ Links ]

10. Vangsness CT, Garcia IA, Mills CR, Kainer MA, Roberts MR, Moore TM. Allograft transplantation in the knee: tissue regulation, procurement, processing, and sterilization. Am J Sports Med. 2003;31(3):474-81.        [ Links ]

11. Debeer P, Decorte R, Bellemans J. DNA analysis of a transplanted cryopreserved meniscal allograft. Arthroscopy. 2000;16(1):71-5.        [ Links ]

12. Graf Jr, KW, Sekiya JK, Wojtys EM. Long-term results after combined medial meniscal allograft transplantation and anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: minimum 8,5 year follow-up study. Arthroscopy. 2004;20(2):129-40.        [ Links ]

13. Felix NA, Paulos LE. Current status of meniscal transplantation. Knee. 2003;10:13-7.        [ Links ]

14. Johnson LL, Feagin JR, JA. Autogenous tendon graft substitution for absent knee joint meniscus: a pilot study. Arthroscopy. 2000;16:191-6.        [ Links ]

15. Sgaglione NA, Steadman R, Shafter B, Miller MD, Fu FH. Current concepts in meniscus surgery: resection to replacement. Arthroscopy. 2003;19(10):161-88.        [ Links ]

16. Milachowski KA, Weismeier K, Wirth CJ. Homologous meniscus transplantation: Experimental and clinical results. Int Orthop. 1989;13:1-11.        [ Links ]

17. Carter TR. Osteocondral allograft transplantation. Sports medicine and arthroscopy review 2004;11(4):264-71.        [ Links ]

18. Rijk PC, van Noorden CJF. Structural analysis of meniscal allograft after immediate and delayed transplantation in rabbits. Arthroscopy. 2002;18:995-1001.        [ Links ]

19. Ochi M, Ishida O, Daisaku H, Ikuda Y, Akiyama M. Immune response to fresh meniscal allografts in mice. J Surg Res. 1995;58:478-84.        [ Links ]

20. Ball S, Amiel D, Williams S, Tontz W, Chen A, Sah R, Bugbee W. The effects storage on fresh human osteochondral allografts. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;1(418):246-52.        [ Links ]

 

 

Correspondence to
Leandro José Reckers
Rua Dr. Altino Arantes, 958/42
04042-004 São Paulo – SP Brazil
Phone: (55 11)5599-4645
Fax: (55 11)5571-0233
leandroreckers@uol.com.br

Received: May 11, 2005
Review: June 14, 2005
Accepted: July 15, 2005
Conflict of interest: none
Financial source: CAPES

 

 

1. Research from Surgery and Experimentation Post-Graduate Program of São Paulo Federal University/Escola Paulista de Medicina. – São Paulo – Brazil.

Creative Commons License All the contents of this journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License