SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.23 issue4Phenobarbital influence on neuromuscular block produced by rocuronium in ratsComparative study of the healing process of the aponeurosis of the anterior abdominal wall of rats after wound closure using 3-0 nylon suture and N-butil-2-cyanoacrylate tissue adhesive author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Article

Indicators

Related links

Share


Acta Cirurgica Brasileira

On-line version ISSN 1678-2674

Acta Cir. Bras. vol.23 no.4 São Paulo July/Aug. 2008

http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0102-86502008000400009 

9 - ORIGINAL ARTICLE
PERITONEUM

 

Comparative study between parietal peritoneum suture and nonsuture in midline laparotomies in rats1

 

Estudo comparativo entre sutura e não sutura do peritônio parietal nas laparotomias medianas em ratos

 

 

Arildo de Toledo VianaI; Fernanda Vasquez DaudII; Andréia BonizziaIII; Paulo Henrique Fogaça de BarrosIV; Eduardo Sauerbronn GouvêaIV

IAssociate Professor, Chief Division of Operative Technique and Experimental Surgery, Faculty of Medical Sciences Santa Casa of São Paulo, Brazil
IIAssistant Professor, Felow PhD degree in Health Sciences, Faculty of Medical Sciences Santa Casa of São Paulo, Brazil
IIIBiologist, Felow Master degree in Health Sciences, Faculty of Medical Sciences Santa Casa of São Paulo, Brazil
IVGraduate student, Faculty of Medical Sciences Santa Casa of São Paulo, Brazil

Correspondence

 

 


ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Compare the parietal peritoneum suture and nonsuture in midline laparotomies in rats, as for the formation of adhesions.
METHODS: 40 adult albino Wistar rats (20 males and 20 females) underwent a surgery, weighing between 350 and 400 grams. After anesthesia, a midline laparotomy was performed, followed by cavity closure with and without peritoneum suture. After 40 days, the rats underwent a new surgery in order to verify the peritoneum and check if there were any adhesions, and the rats were then sacrificed.
RESULTS: Statistical analysis showed there was no significant difference between the adhesions occurring or not with peritoneal suture or nonsuture, including in relation to the rats' gender.
CONCLUSION: Closing the peritoneum or not does not interfere with the formation of adhesions after midline laparotomies in rats from both genders.

Key words: Peritoneum. Adhesions. Sutures. Rats.


RESUMO

OBJETIVO: Comparar a sutura e não sutura do peritônio parietal nas laparotomias medianas em ratos, quanto à formação de aderências.
MÉTODOS: Foram operados 40 ratos albinos Wistar (20 machos e 20 fêmeas), adultos, pesando entre 350 e 400 gramas. Após a anestesia, foi realizada laparotomia mediana seguida de fechamento da cavidade com sutura do peritônio e sem sutura do peritônio. Após 40 dias, os animais foram re-operados para a inspeção do peritônio e a constatação da presença ou não de aderências e, em seguida, sacrificados.
RESULTADOS: A análise estatística demonstrou que não houve diferença significativa entre a ocorrência ou não de aderências com sutura e não sutura do peritônio, nem com relação ao sexo dos animais operados.
CONCLUSÃO: O fechamento ou não do peritônio não interfere na formação de aderências após laparotomias medianas em ratos de ambos os sexos.

Descritores: Peritônio. Aderências. Suturas. Ratos.


 

 

Introduction

Currently, the surgical technique used by a large number of obstetricians and gynecologists is performed by not closing the visceral and/or the parietal peritoneum. Literature indicates experimental works and observations in humans discussing the issue.

There are a lot of thoughts on what is the best method for the synthesis of the abdominal wall after a laparotomy. One of the issues involved is the variability in the individual answer to the initial surgical aggression, with a possible formation of adhesions in the scar, which may lead to obstructive abdominal conditions, sometimes with catastrophic consequences1. Infertility and pain are other sequels that might occur2.

Complications are long-term and unpredictable, and adhesions have a great impact in post-surgery over the surgical routine and the hospital resources, resulting in considerable health expenses2.

Post-surgical adhesions are developed after a trauma to the mesothelium, which is frequently damaged after surgical manipulation and contact with the instruments, strange bodies as suture material, glove dust and dissection. Adhesions result from the normal peritoneum answer during the healing of the wound, and develop from the first five to seven days after the injury2.

In order to evaluate the possible involvement of the peritoneum in adhesion after laparotomies cases, studies with rats were performed comparing the suture or nonsuture of the peritonium1,3.

The objective of the work herein was to compare the parietal peritoneum suture and nonsuture in midline laparotomies in rats, regarding the formation of adhesions.

 

Methods

The essay was approved by the Animal Experimentation Ethics Committee of the Medical Sciences College of Santa Casa de São Paulo (protocol nº 144), being performed at the Surgical Technical and Experimental Surgery Unit (UTECE, Unidade de Técnica Cirúrgica e Cirurgia Experimental) of the Medical Sciences College of Santa Casa de São Paulo.

Forty adult albino Wistar rats (20 males and 20 females), weighing between 350 and 400 grams, underwent a surgery in the Surgical Technical and Experimental Surgery Unit (UTECE) of the Medical Sciences College of Santa Casa de São Paulo. The animals received food and water ad libitum, in an artificial light environment in a 12-hour dark-light cycle. Anesthesia was performed with ketamin (75 mg/Kg) and xilasin (5 mg/Kg) via intra peritoneum. Initially, only the male rats were operated, with midline laparotomy of 4.0 cm, followed by a closure of the abdominal cavity with and without peritoneal suture, alternately.

When the peritoneum was closed, we performed a continuous suture with poligregarpone 25 (Monocryl 4-0). The cavity was closed by approaching the aponeurosis lip by lip with the same string, and the skin with a nylon 4-0 string, in separated stitches.

Then, 20 females underwent a surgery, using the same technique.

After 40 days, the animals underwent a new surgery, and their abdominal cavity was opened through a paramedian incision to the right, parallel to the original one, and two transversal incisions from the edges of the paramedian incision, thus forming a "window" that allowed the inner part of the cavity to be observed, making the verification of the peritoneum and the presence of adhesion easy (Figure 1).

 

 

Wistar rats received a lethal dose of potassium chloride at 19.1% after that surgery still under the anesthetic effect.

For the statistical analysis of this study, the Qui-Square Test was used, and p< 0.05 significant values were considered.

 

Results

Adhesions found occurred between the epyplon and the peritoneal tissue in the abdominal wall (Figure 2). There was a full reconstitution of the parietal peritoneal tissue in all animals (Figure 3).

 

 

 

 

In the male group, we found more adhesions in animals with peritoneal suture (3 cases) than in animals where the peritoneum was not sutured (2 cases), as well as in the female group, with 8 cases for peritoneal suture, than in animals where the peritoneum was not sutured (4 cases).

The statistical analysis of those results performed through the Qui-Square Test method showed that there were no significant differences between the occurrence of adhesions or not, either with peritoneal suture or nonsuture, neither related to the gender of the rats that underwent surgeries (Table 1).

 

 

For a freedom degree level 1, probability is 0.20. Therefore, results are not significant. A p > 0.05 value was determined through a Qui-Square Test, so there was no significant difference between the peritoneal closure or not, and the presence of adhesions.

 

Discussion

By studying the bibliography quoted, we realized there is a lot of controversy around that subject and a significant difference between the experimental works and the works performed with human subject observations.

Paradoxally, works on the subject are profusely larger in human observation than animals.

The abdominal cavity is the way for all the celomic surgeries, as well as for most procedures in retroperitoneal areas. As a consequence, incision and suture in the abdominal wall is one of the most common exercises in surgical practice4.

The basic principle of surgical incision closure is to restore the shape and function of the abdominal wall after surgical procedures5.

It is suggested that the mass suture, involving the peritoneum and the muscles, comprises a finer technique that suturing the abdominal wall by layers6,7.

The formation of adhesions during the post-surgery period is a common complication in abdominal surgeries8, and peritoneal adhesions are the largest cause of morbidity9.

The study herein aimed at evaluating the influence of both peritoneal suture and nonsuture of rats in the formation of adhesions. Despite the exhaustive bibliographic research, we did not find a significant number of articles in literature that addressed the subject specifically in rats, and only related to peritoneal suture or nonsuture.

There are authors that suggest that peritoneal suture might increase the formation of adhesions10,11. In a study involving Wistar rats, laparotomies and friction of organs with dry gauze were performed, resulting in a significantly larger number of adhesions in the sutured peritoneum group3.

Another work comparing peritoneum-aponeurotic suture and nonsuture in rats has evidenced the presence of adhesion in both groups, without a significant difference1. The standardization of an experimental model in adhesion formation was also researched in rats, which were found in large numbers when the peritoneal wound was sutured8.

Literature presents similar essays performed in other kinds of animals, like rabbits and dogs, showing conflicting results in relation to the formation of adherences, according to the species studied12,13,14.

In humans, the works presented focus only the results obtained by not closing the peritoneum in caesarean sections or gynecological surgeries, without stating any data for comparison.

The experimental studies analyzed did not present any appropriate models in order to establish a relation between the data obtained and the observations in humans, which are performed in caesarean sections, a situation that was not taken into consideration in experimental studies.

As for the peritoneal suture or nonsuture when closing the abdominal cavity in gynecological surgeries, results indicated in literature show that there might be a reduction of around six minutes in time, saving in suture wires and other doubtful data, such as the decrease in pain and post-surgical hospital stay.

Cochrane Library conclusions15, indicate and suggest that "...more researches must be performed on the long-term benefits or complications, related to the non-closure of the peritoneum in caesarian sections, and new reviews are expected to be published, as well as more studies should be evaluated".

 

Conclusion

There was no significant difference in relation to the formation of adhesions when comparing peritoneal suture and nonsuture in rats, as well as in relation to the rats gender.

 

References

1. Biondo-Simões MLP, Marques LO, Adur RC, Cavazzana W, Lima EB. Closure x non-closure of the peritoneum and the adhesions formation: experimental study in rats. Rev Bras Cir. 1996;86(6):303-5.         [ Links ]

2. Holmdahl L, Risberg B, Beck DE, Burns JW, Chegini N, diZerega GS, Ellis H. Adhesions: pathogenesis and prevention-panel discussion and summary. Eur J Surg Suppl 1997;(577):56-2.         [ Links ]

3. Kyzer S, Bayer I, Turani H, Chaimoff C. The influence of peritoneal closure on formation of intraperitoneal adhesions: an experimental study. Int J Tissue React. 1986;8(5):355-9.         [ Links ]

4. Fry DE, Osler T. Abdominal wall considerations and complications in reoperative surgery: review. Surg Clin North Am. 1991;71(1):1-11.         [ Links ]

5. Wadstrom J, Gerdin B. Closure of the abdominal wall; how and why? Clinical review. Acta Cir Scand. 1990;156(1):75-82.         [ Links ]

6. Jones TE, Newell ET Jr, Brubaker RE. The use of alloy steel wire in the closure of abdominal wounds. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1941;72:1056-9.         [ Links ]

7. Ceydeli A, Rucinski J, Wise L. Finding the best abdominal closure: an evidence-based review of the literature. Curr Surg 2005;62(2):220-5.         [ Links ]

8. Holmdahl L, al Jabreen M, Risberg B. Experimental models for quantitative studies on adhesion formation in rats and rabbits. Eur Surg Res. 1994;26(4):248-6.         [ Links ]

9. O'Leary DP, Coakley JB. The influence of suturing and sepsis on the development of postoperative peritoneal adhesions. Am R Coll Surg Engl. 1992;74(2):134-7.         [ Links ]

10. diZerega GS, Campeau JD. Peritoneal repair and post-surgical adhesion formation. Hum Reprod Update. 2001;7(6):547-55.         [ Links ]

11. Kapur ML, Daneswar A, Chopra P. Evaluation of peritoneal closure at laparotomy. Am J Surg. 1979;137(5):650-2.         [ Links ]

12. Milewczyk M. Experimental studies on the development of peritoneal adhesions in cases of suturing and non-suturing of the parietal peritoneum in rabbits. Ginekol Pol. 1989;60(1):1-6.         [ Links ]

13. Silva MAC, Bassi DG, Paula PR, Cauduro AB, Moura LAR, Novo NF, Speranzini MB. Influence of peritonel suturing on adhesion formation at the scar of the laparotomy wound: experimental study in dogs. Acta Cir Bras. 1990;5(2):71-4.         [ Links ]

14. Salgado MI, Petroianu A, Burgarelli GL, Nunes CB, Alberti LR, Vasconcellos LS. Abdominal wall morphology and healing resistance after longitudinal and transversal laparotomy in rabbits. Rev Col Bras Cir. 2007;34(4):232-6.         [ Links ]

15. Bamigboye AA, Hofmeyr GJ. Closure versus non-closure of the peritoneum at caesarean section (Review). Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 (4) [serial on line] Available from: http://cochrane.bvsalud.org/portal [accessed 14 fev 2008]         [ Links ].

 

 

Correspondence:
Arildo de Toledo Viana
Rua Abílio Soares, 666/123ª
05040-002 São Paulo - SP Brazil
Phone: 55-11 3051 6483
labutece@santacasasp.org.br

Received: January 21, 2008
Review: February 18, 2008
Accepted: April 23, 2008
Conflict of interest: none
Financial source: none

 

 

1 Research performed at Division of Operative Technique and Experimental Surgery, Faculty of Medical Sciences Santa Casa of São Paulo, Brazil.