SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.25 issue6Metabolic changes induced by pre-administration of L-alanyl-glutamine and Omega-3 in Wistar rats subjected to sepsisUltrastructural evaluation of human keratinocyte growth and differentiation on a fibrin substrate author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

Share


Acta Cirurgica Brasileira

On-line version ISSN 1678-2674

Acta Cir. Bras. vol.25 no.6 São Paulo Nov./Dec. 2010

http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0102-86502010000600014 

14 – ORIGINAL ARTICLE
INVESTIGATIVE SURGERY

 

Comparison between actual and predicted postoperative stair-climbing test, walk test and spirometric values in patients undergoing lung resection1

 

Comparação dos testes de escada, caminhada e espirometria preditos com os obtidos no pós-operatório de ressecções pulmonares

 

 

Marcos Vinícius Cataneo PancieriI; Daniele Cristina CataneoII; Jair Cortez MontovaniIII; Antonio José Maria CataneoIV

IFellow Master degree of Surgery, UNESP, Botucatu-SP, Brazil
IIPhD, Assistant Professor, Thoracic Surgery Division, Department of Surgery, Botucatu School of Medicine, UNESP, Botucatu-SP, Brazil
IIIPhD, Associate Professor, Department of Otorrinolaryngology, Botucatu School of Medicine, UNESP, Botucatu-SP, Brazil
IVChairman Full Professor, Thoracic Surgery Division, Department of Surgery, Botucatu School of Medicine, UNESP, Botucatu-SP, Brazil

Correspondence

 

 


ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To assess whether the tests - Forced Expiratory Volume at one second (FEV1), 6-minute walk test (6MWT) and stair-climbing test (SCT) showed proportional changes after the resection of functioning lung.
METHODS: Candidates for pulmonary resection were included. Spirometry, 6MWT and SCT were performed preoperatively (pre) and at least 3 months after surgery (pos). SCT was performed on a staircase with a total ascent height of 12.16m. The time taken to climb the total height the fastest possible was defined as stair-climbing time (SCt). Number of functioning segments lost, was used to calculated predicted postoperative (ppo) tests values. Pre, ppo and pos values for each test were compared. Data were analyzed by repeated-measure ANOVA with significance level set at 5%.
RESULTS: A total of 40 patients were enrolled. Pulmonary resection results ranged from gain of 2 functioning segments to loss of 9. Pre, ppo and pos values were the following: preFEV1 = 2.6±0.8L, ppo FEV1 =2.3±0.8L, and pos FEV1=2.3±0.8L, (pre FEV1 > ppo FEV1 = pos FEV1); pre6MWT = 604±63m, ppo6MWT= 529±103m, pos6MWT= 599±74m (pre6MWT = pos6MWT > ppo6MWT); preSCt = 32.9±7.6s, ppoSCt = 37.8±12.1s, posSCt = 33.7±8.5s (preSCt = posSCt < ppoSCt).
CONCLUSION: In our group of patients, pulmonary resection led to loss of lung function measured by spirometry, but not to exercise capacity measured by stair-climbing and walk tests.

Key words: Respiratory Function Tests. Heart Function Tests. Spirometry.


RESUMO

OBJETIVO: Verificar se os testes: Volume Expiratório Forçado no 1º segundo (VEF1), Teste de Caminhada de 6 minutos (TC6) e Teste de Escada (TE) se alteram proporcionalmente ao pulmão funcionante ressecado.
MÉTODOS: Foram incluídos pacientes candidatos a toracotomia para ressecção pulmonar. No pré-operatório (pré) e no mínimo três meses após a cirurgia (pós), realizaram espirometria, TC6 e TE. O TE foi realizado em escada com 12,16m de altura. O tempo para subir todos os degraus o mais rápido possível foi chamado tempo de escada (tTE). Os cálculos dos valores dos testes preditos para o pós-operatório (ppo) foram realizados conforme o número de segmentos funcionantes perdidos. Os valores pré, ppo e pós foram comparados entre si para cada teste. Estatística: foi utilizada a análise de variância para medidas repetidas (ANOVA), com significância de 5%.
RESULTADOS: Foram estudados 40 pacientes. A ressecção pulmonar variou desde o ganho de dois segmentos funcionantes até a perda de 9. Os valores pré, ppo e pós foram respectivamente: VEF1 -pré = 2,6±0,8L, ppo = 2,3±0,8L, pós = 2,3±0,8L (VEF1pré > VEF1ppo = VEF1pós), TC6-pré = 604±63m, ppo = 529±103m, pós = 599±74m (TC6pré = TC6pós > TC6ppo), tTE-pré = 32,9±7,6s, ppo = 37,8±12,1s, pós = 33,7±8,5s (tTEpré = tTEpós < tTEppo).
CONCLUSÃO:
Nas ressecções pulmonares, este grupo de pacientes perdeu função pulmonar medida através da espirometria, mas não perdeu a capacidade de exercício, medida através dos testes de escada e caminhada.

Descritores: Testes de Função Respiratória. Testes de Função Cardíaca. Espirometria.


 

 

Introduction

Isolated thoracotomy is known to reduce pulmonary volumes and capacity for several weeks after surgery. In a resection of functioning lung tissue, such a reduction is permanent. Thus, surgery may be contraindicated when predicted postoperative (ppo) lung volumes are minimal and not compatible with life. According to some investigators, ppo values are lower than actual postoperative values1, this can carry surgery contraindications in patients that could tolerate the surgery. The results of exercise tests have been considered stronger prognostic predictors than spirometry, which only assesses lungs at resting and is, therefore, recommended for preoperative screening2. A very efficient test for the evaluation of exercise performance is ergospirometry. However, few are the centers where ergospirometers are available. Other tests, such as the stair-climbing test (SCT), the 6-minute walk test (6MWT) or the 12-minute walk test (12MWT), are not so efficient, but can be undertaken nearly everywhere.

SCT was described as predictive of surgical risk in 1961 by Souders et al.3, for whom the inability to climb two flights of stairs indicated high mortality risk. In 1987, SCT was demonstrated to be comparable to spirometry4. In the 1990s, a number of investigators reported its use to measure preoperative cardiopulmonary performance. Olsen et al.5 reported that patients unable to climb three flights of stairs had a high surgical risk. Holden et al.6, in turn, classified risk according to the number of steps climbed, while Pate et al.7 established the height achieved without encouragement as the test parameter.

In 2007, Cataneo and Cataneo8 suggested the use of the parameter stair-climbing time (SCt), defined as the time taken to climb a stairway of known height with verbal encouragement. They demonstrated that, in comparison with VO2 max measured by ergospirometry, SCt had good accuracy. In the same year, Brunelli et al.9 associated the height achieved with postoperative morbidity and mortality. They demonstrated that patients climbing less than 12 m had higher rates of cardiopulmonary complications, and concluded that SCT is very good in stratifying surgical risk and should be used in all candidates for lung resection, as it is simple, inexpensive and effective, but large prospective studies need to be undertaken before stair climbing can be advocated in a standardized way. Cataneo et al.10 also showed that beyond SCt, the 6MWT had good accuracy when compared with the VO2max of ergoespirometry and SCt and 6MWT combined showed nearly 100% sensitivity or specificity.

In this study, ppo FEV1 was preoperatively calculated based on the amount of functioning parenchyma to be resected. In the literature, however, no means to calculate SCT and 6MWT ppo values are reported.

The main aim of this study was to assess whether FEV1, 6MWT and SCT showed proportional loss of function following pulmonary resection.

 

Methods

After approval by the Research Ethics Committee of Botucatu Medical School–UNESP, all candidates for thoracotomy for pulmonary resection, who were older than 18 years of age, and hospitalized in the Thoracic Surgery Ward of Botucatu Medical School Hospital, were invited to participate in this study. Exclusion criteria included severe arterial hypertension (systolic arterial pressure > 200mmHg and diastolic arterial pressure > 110mmHg), decompensated heart failure, infarction within the past 90 days instable angina, decompensated COPD, electrocardiogram showing complete left bundle branch block, walking difficulty (orthopedic, neurological, vascular abnormalities), inability to undergo the walk test and any acute condition.

Spirometry was followed by 6MWT and SCT. An obligatory rest period of 20 minutes was observed between 6MWT and SCT. Because inability to complete the walk test was an exclusion criterion, 6MWT was performed before SCT.

Data collected before and after exercise testing included: arterial blood pressure, respiratory rate, heart rate (HR) and oxygen saturation (O2Sat). HR and O2Sat were monitored throughout testing. O2Sat was measured with a portable digital pulse oxymeter (Nonin Onyx 9500-Fingerpulsoximeter)®.

All three tests (spirometry, SCT and 6MWT) were repeated at least 3 months after surgery, when pulmonary volumes and capacity were expected to be no longer reduced as a result of thoracotomy.

Spirometry was performed according to the American Thoracic Society guidelines (ATS). A Med-Graphics Pulmonary Function System 1070 was used with the patient in the sitting position. Forced vital capacity was measured at least three times choosing the curve with the highest FEV1.

The 6-minute walk test, which was also performed according to ATS guidelines, consisted of measuring the distance covered by the patient in meters after six minutes of encouraged walking in the shade along a flat 120-m corridor.

SCT was based on our previous study8,10. It was performed in the shade, on a staircase of 30º in incline which consisted of six flights, each flight having twelve steps (72 steps in total) measuring 16.9cm. Total ascent height was 12.16m. Patients were asked to climb all the steps in the shortest possible time with verbal encouragement between flights. Testing was stopped only for fatigue, limiting dyspnea, thoracic pain, or exhaustion. The time taken to climb the stairs (SCt) was expressed in seconds.

Functioning and non-functioning pulmonary segment: a pulmonary segment was considered non-functioning when atelectasis, fibroatelectasis, tumor or peri-tumor radiopacity were radiologically detected; and bronchial obstruction > 75% at bronchoscopy. Half of the segment was considered functional if obstructions ranged from 50 to 75%, whereas the entire segment was considered as functional when obstructions were < 50% and peripheral radiological abnormalities were absent. The total number of functioning segments (FS) was assumed to be 19 (10 in the right lung and 9 in the left lung).

Calculation of ppo values: the predicted postoperative values (ppoV) for FEV1 and the distance walked in the 6MWT were calculated by rule of three direct using the values obtained preoperatively (pre V) as follows: ppoV = preV x (FS – resected FS) ÷ FS. Predicted postoperative stair-climbing time (ppoSCt) was estimated by rule of three inverse as follows: ppoSCt = preSCt x FS ÷ (FS – resected FS), where preSCt is preoperative stair-climbing time.

Statistical analysis: pre and postoperative results were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Spirometric, 6MWT and SCT data were compared using parametric statistics. Preoperative, postoperative and ppo FEV1, 6MWT distance and SCt were compared by parametric repetead-measures ANOVA with significance level set at 5%.

Statistical analysis was conducted for all patients in one group and also for patients separated as 2 groups (loss of < 4 functioning segments and loss of > 4 functioning segments).

Correlations between ppo and postoperative values for each variable were tested estimating r-values and linear regressions.

 

Results

A total of 40 patients were assessed before and after surgery. Patient age ranged from 18 to 70 years (mean±SD = 48±16). Twenty-two were male, 35 had lung cancer and 5 had lung infectious sequelae. FEV1 mean ± SD was 84.0 ± 25.3%. Both pre-and postoperatively, three patients showed desaturation > 4% during exercise testing, though no clinical repercussions were deemed extreme enough to terminate the test.

Number of functioning segments after surgery: in only one case, two segments were gained due to bronchial patency by sleeve resection. In eight cases, there was no segment loss as all segments resected were already non-functioning before resection. The number of segments lost was one in 11 cases, two in five cases, three in one case, four in three cases, five in nine cases, seven in one case, and nine in one case.

FEV1 postoperative was smaller than FEV1 preoperative, but 6MWT postoperative and SCt postoperative were similar to 6MWT preoperative and SCt preoperative. FEV1, 6MWT distance and SCt preoperative (pre), predicted postoperative (ppo), and postoperative (pos) values expressed as mean and standard deviation, as well as p-values and test interpretation for all patients in one group are shown in Table 1.

 

 

The analysis of the patients separated into two groups revealed no statistical difference in pre, ppo and pos FEV1, 6MWT distance and SCt when the number of resected segments was less than four. However, when four or more segments were resected, the statistical interpretation was the same as that for all patients in one group.

The correlations between ppo and actual pos FEV1, 6MWT distance and SCt are depicted in Figures 1, 2 and 3, respectively. The best correlation was between ppo FEV1 and pos FEV1, and the worst correlation was between ppo 6MWT and pos 6MWT.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Discussion

Of the three parameters assessed in this study, FEV1 showed the best linear correlation between predicted and actual postoperative values. No significant differences were observed between ppo and postoperative FEV1. Thus, considering exclusively the functioning pulmonary segments as lost when calculating ppo FEV1, seems to be acceptable. To date, the majority of studies available do not make it clear whether only functioning segments are considered as lost when ppo function is calculated. When functioning and non-functioning segments removed are taken into account, the predicted postoperative value is likely to be smaller than the actual postoperative value. Zeiher et al.1, in a retrospective study, demonstrated that ppoFEV1 underestimates the actual postoperative FEV1 by 250 ml in patients undergoing lobectomy, and proposed adding 250 ml to the calculated ppo value. These findings were probably caused by the non-separation of functioning from non-functioning resected segments. Counting an occluded segment as a functioning segment removed does yield a lower ppo value, but, rather than underestimation, this is a case of miscalculation. In the case of exercise tests, however, the rather weak correlations found indicate that postoperative performance depends on factors other than pulmonary volumes. The fact that the actual postoperative values for 6MWT and SCT variables were higher than those predicted favors those patients who are taken to surgery with minimum ppo values.

Scintillography can increase the sensitivity of the method as calculation using simple arithmetic mean assumes that each segment represents 1/19 of the lung function. This would be close to be correct if scintillographic uptake were the same for each segment. However, if uptake is greater on one side than on the other, the functioning segment removed from the side with greater uptake would be more functional than the segment on the side with lower uptake. In this case, the weighted mean should be used for calculation. In this study, there was no case requiring scintillography, so all functioning segments were considered to equally contribute for pulmonary function.

Even though the risk of complications after pulmonary resection has already been demonstrated to be higher as ppoFEV1 decreases11, other studies have not yielded the same results12. FEV1, as well as other spirometric values are assessed in lungs at resting, not taking into account the physical stress caused by surgery or the physical effort required by daily activities. This indicates that spirometry alone is not adequate to predict surgical risk. The literature has lately shown that the maximum oxygen uptake measured during exercising by ergospirometry is the ideal predictor of surgical risk12. Nonetheless, few are the centers where an ergospirometer is available. Given that stair-climbing and walk tests have already proven to be good predictors of surgical risk6,9,10,13, and that stair-climbing time accuracy is good as compared with VO2max measured by ergospirometry8,10, the use of these tests, which are low-cost and readily available in all centers, deserve consideration.

The 6-minute walk test can be easily performed because of the familiarity of the patients with this form of exercise. Indeed, it can be used with most patients, including the elderly with lower levels of understanding that are unable to undergo treadmill or cycloergometric testing.

In a systematic review of walk tests14, it was observed that the 6MWT was most commonly employed in patients with COPD or heart failure, and less frequently in cases of surgery. In these studies, the distance walked strongly correlated with VO2max measured on a cycle ergometer or treadmill. Some investigators have shown that when the distance walked was 300m or less, the risk of mortality or hospitalization was likely to increase.

Stair-climbing test performance has been diversely assessed. Results have been reported in several ways, from height reached in numbers of flights climbed without encouragement3-6, to the number of steps climbed with encouragement to climb the fastest possible8,10,15. These differences in method have made it difficult to compare the results obtained across different centers. Nonetheless, regardless of the approach used, this test has been very helpful.

Brunelli et al.13 showed that stair climbing was the best predictor of mortality or severe cardiopulmonary complications after lung resection. However, they clearly stated that patients should climb at a pace of their own choice with no concern about speed9,13. Koegelenberg et al.15 and Cataneo et al.8,10, in turn, focused on the speed of ascent. They used a stairway of known height with stair-climbing time as the variable, whereas Brunelli et al.9,13 focused on the height achieved. Anyway, both approaches were found to be valid. However, when patients are allowed to climb at their own pace without encouragement, very high staircases are needed because exhaustion is height-limited. On the other hand, when the focus is on time and patients are encouraged to climb as rapid as possible, lower stairways can be used because, in this case, exhaustion is speed-limited.

In our center, there are few stair flights, but the measurement of time makes it possible to compare our results with those obtained in any other study also using time as a variable. Time correlates with the constant height achieved, allowing the calculation of average speed. An analogy might be established between SCT and 6MWT: while the first focuses on a fixed height to assess time, the latter focuses on a fixed time to measure distance.

In this study, FEV1 could be roughly calculated on the basis of the number of functioning segments lost. However, stratifying the patients into 2 groups according to the number of functioning segments removed revealed that FEV1 calculation was more precise when the number of segments was 4 or more. Similarly, other investigators have reported a strong correlation between predicted and actual postoperative values when more than 3 segments were resected, and no correlation when resections were smaller16, but they did not make it clear whether functioning segments alone were considered as lost. Among our patients, no significant difference between ppo and postoperative values was found after small resections, even when only resected functioning segments were taken into account. Perhaps, differences were so slight that significance would not be reached unless a much larger number of patients were assessed, but the calculation of such small losses did not reveal any significant difference between preoperative and ppo values either. This probably occurred because, in many cases, the segments resected were already not functioning before surgery and, therefore, could not be considered as lost. Even more sophisticated calculation methods using ventilation and perfusion scintillography have not been able to adequately predict ppoFEV117.

Several permanent or transient reasons could hinder the adequate prediction of lung volumes by spirometry after pulmonary resection. Ventilation disorders induced by secretion, atelectasis, edema, infection or even physiological alveolar collapse can alter lung function.

The fact that preoperative exercise testing parameters remained similar to those measured after resection shows that, in spite of FEV1 loss, our patients kept their exercise capacity, being able to perform the less stressing 6MWT as well as the more vigorous SCT.

Similar findings have been reported by others who observed that, although FEV1 and VO2max values decreased after pulmonary resection, the correlation between FEV1 fall and VO2max fall was weak. Thus, they concluded that fall in FEV1 was a poor predictor of the fall in exercise capacity after lung resection, and that lobectomy had little or no effect on VO2max18. Notwithstanding, recent studies have stressed the importance of exercise testing even for the prediction of hospital costs13,19. These investigators showed that reduced exercise capacity is associated with longer hospital stays and costs among patients undergoing pulmonary resection.

It is probable that the postoperative exercise test results reported here remained at preoperative levels because the performance of our patients was well within the acceptable range, in contrast with the patients studied by Brunelli et al.13, who were not able to climb 12m at their own pace, and thus generated a 2.5-fold increase in hospital costs as compared with those who climbed 22m. Indeed, patients with no cardiopulmonary reserve require better preoperative support.

 

Conclusion

This study demonstrated that, anatomical calculations could accurately predict postoperative FEV1 values, but overestimated the loss of exercise capacity as measured by stair-climbing test and 6 minute walk test.

 

References

1. Zeiher BG, Gross TJ, Kerny JA, Lanza LA, Peterson MW. Predicting postoperative pulmonary function in patients undergoing lung resection. Chest. 1995;108:68-72.         [ Links ]

2. Ferraza AM, Martolini D, Valli G, Palange P. Cardiopulmonary exercise testing in the functional and prognostic evaluation of patients with pulmonary diseases. Respiration. 2009;77:3-17.         [ Links ]

3. Souders CR. Clinical evaluation of the patient for thoracic surgery. Surg Clin North Am. 1961;41:545-56.         [ Links ]

4. Bolton JWR, Weiman DS, Haynes JL, Hornung CA, Olsen GN, Almond CH. Stair climbing as an indicator of pulmonary function. Chest. 1987;92:783-8.         [ Links ]

5. Olsen GN, Bolton JWR, Weiman DS, Hornung CA. Stair climbing as an exercise test to predict the postoperative complications of lung resection: two years' experience. Chest. 1991;99:587-90.         [ Links ]

6. Holden DA, Rice TW, Stelmach K, Meeker DP. Exercise testing, 6 minute walk, and stair climb in the evaluation of patients at high risk for pulmonary resection. Chest. 1992;102:1774-9.         [ Links ]

7. Pate P, Tenholder MF, Griffin JP, Eastridge CE, Weiman DS. Preoperative assessment of the high-risk patient for lung resection. Ann Thorac Surg. 1996;61:1494-500.         [ Links ]

8. Cataneo DC, Cataneo AJ. Accuracy of the stair climbing test using maximal oxygen uptake as the gold standard. J Bras Pneumol. 2007;33(2):128-33. Available from URL: http://www.jornaldepneumologia.com.br/english/artigo_detalhes.asp?id=406        [ Links ]

9. Brunelli A, Socci L, Refai M, Salati M, Xiumé F, Sabbatini A. Quality of life before and after major lung resection for lung cancer: a prospective follow-up analysis. Ann Thorac Surg. 2007;84:410-6.         [ Links ]

10. Cataneo DC, Kobayasi S, Carvalho LR, Paccanaro RC, Cataneo AJM. Accuracy of six minute walk test, stair test and spirometry using maximal oxygen uptake as gold standard. Acta Cir Bras. [serial on the Internet] 2010 Mar-Apr;25(2). Available from URL: http://www.scielo.br/acb        [ Links ]

11. Kearney DJ, Lee TH, Reilly JJ, DeCamp MM, Sugarbaker DJ. Assessment of operative risk in patients undergoing lung resection: importance of predicted pulmonary function. Chest. 1994;105:75-9.         [ Links ]

12. Win T, Jackson A, Sharples L, Groves AM, Wells FC, Ritchie AJ, Laroche CM. Cardiopulmonary exercise tests and lung cancer surgical outcome. Chest. 2005;127:1159-65.         [ Links ]

13. Brunelli A, Refai M, Xiumé F, Salati M, Sciarra V, Socci L, Sabbatini A. Performance at symptom-limited stair-climbing test is associated with increased cardiopulmonary complications, mortality, and costs after major lung resection. Ann Thorac Surg. 2008;86:240-8.         [ Links ]

14. Solway S, Brooks D, Lacasse Y, Thomas S. A qualitative systematic overview of the measurement properties of functional walk tests used in the cardiorespiratory domain. Chest. 2001;119:256-70.         [ Links ]

15. Koegelenberg CFN, Diacon AH, Irani S, Bolliger CT. Stair climbing in the functional assessment of lung resection candidates. Respiration. 2008;75:374-9.         [ Links ]

16. Ali MK, Mountain CF, Ewer MS, Johnston D, Haynie TP. Predicting loss of pulmonary function after pulmonary resection for bronchogenic carcinoma. Chest. 1980;77(3):337-42.         [ Links ]

17. Ladurie ML, Ranson-Bitker B. Uncertainties in the expected value for forced expiratory volume in one second after surgery. Chest. 1986;90:222-8.         [ Links ]

18. Pelletier C, Lapointe L, Leblanc P. Effects of lung resection on pulmonary function and exercise capacity. Thorax. 1990;45:497-502.         [ Links ]

19. Weinstein H, Bates AT, Spaltro BE, Thaler HT, Steingart RM. Influence of preoperative exercise capacity on length of stay after thoracic cancer surgery. Ann Thorac Surg. 2007;84:197-202.         [ Links ]

 

Acknowledgment

We thank the Research Support Group of the Botucatu School of Medicine, UNESP for language revision.

 

 

Correspondence:
Antonio José Maria Cataneo
Disciplina de Cirurgia Torácica-Departamento de Cirurgia e Ortopedia
Faculdade de Medicina de Botucatú-UNESP
18.618-970 Botucatú-SP Brasil
Phone: (55 14)3811-6230
Fax: (55 14)3815-7615
acataneo@fmb.unesp.br

Received: March 23, 2010
Review: May 20, 2010
Accepted: June 24, 2010

Conflict of interest: none
Financial source: none

 

 

How to cite this article
Pancieri MVC, Cataneo DC, Montovani JC, Cataneo AJM. Comparison between actual and predicted postoperative stair-climbing test, walk test and spirometric values in patients undergoing lung resection. Acta Cir Bras. [serial on the Internet] 2010 Nov-Dec;25(6). Available from URL: http://www.scielo.br/acb
*Color figures available from www.scielo.br/acb
1 Research performed at Postgraduate Program on General Basis of Surgery, Botucatu School of Medicine, Sao Paulo State University (UNESP), Brazil.

Creative Commons License All the contents of this journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License