Acessibilidade / Reportar erro

Histological features of peritoneal lavage with ropivacaine in rats with fecal peritonitis

Características histológicas da lavagem peritoneal com ropivacaína em ratos com peritonite fecal

Abstracts

PURPOSE: To evaluate the histological features in lungs, peritoneum and liver of rats subjected to fecal peritonitis and treated with peritoneal lavage with 0.2% ropivacaine. METHODS: Twenty Wistar rats were subjected to laparotomy 6 h after the fecal peritonitis induction with autogenous stool. Rats were randomly distributed into 4 groups: I - (n=5) Control, no treatment; II - (n=5) Drying of the abdominal cavity; III - (n=5) Abdominal cavity lavage with 3 ml 0.9% saline solution and drying; and IV - (n=5) Abdominal cavity lavage with 3 ml 0.2% ropivacaine and drying. The animals that died underwent necropsy, and the surviving ones were subjected to euthanasia on the 11th day post-surgery. Fragments of liver, lungs and peritoneum were removed for histological evaluation. RESULTS: The animals that received peritoneal lavage (groups III and IV) showed greater survival than the drying and control groups. Lavage with ropivacaine prevented death during the observed period. Peritoneal lavage with ropivacaine maintained the architecture of the lung, peritoneum and liver without any important histological alterations. The histopathological findings analyzed correlated with greater survival of group IV. CONCLUSION: Treatment of fecal peritonitis in rats with peritoneal lavage using 0.2% ropivacaine demonstrated a reduction in histopathological alterations related to inflammatory response and sepsis.

Peritonitis; Peritoneal Lavage; Anesthetics; Sepsis; Rats


OBJETIVO: Avaliar os aspectos histopatológicos em pulmões, peritônios e fígados de ratos submetidos à peritonite fecal e tratados com lavagem peritoneal com ropivacaína a 0,2%. MÉTODOS: Utilizou-se 20 ratos Wistar, submetidos à laparotomia 6 horas após a indução de peritonite fecal com fezes autógenas, distribuídos aleatoriamente em quatro grupos: I- (n=5) Controle, nenhum tratamento; II- (n=5) Enxugamento da cavidade abdominal; III- (n=5) Lavagem da cavidade abdominal com 3 ml de solução salina 0,9% e enxugamento ; IV- (n=5) Lavagem da cavidade abdominal com 3 ml de ropivacaína a 0,2% e enxugamento. Os animais que morreram foram necropsiados e os sobreviventes foram eutanasiados no 11º dia do pós-operatório. Retirou-se fragmentos do fígado, pulmões e do peritônio dos animais para estudo histopatológico. RESULTADOS: Os animais que receberam lavagem peritoneal (grupos III e IV) apresentaram maior sobrevida que os grupos enxugamento e controle. A lavagem com ropivacaína impediu o óbito no período avaliado. A lavagem peritoneal com ropivacaína manteve a arquitetura do pulmão, peritônio e fígado sem alterações histológicas importantes. Os achados histopatológicos analisados foram condizentes com o maior tempo de sobrevida no grupo IV. CONCLUSÃO: A lavagem peritoneal com ropivacaína a 0,2% no tratamento da peritonite fecal em ratos demonstrou reduzir as alterações histopatológicas relacionados à resposta inflamatória e sepse.

Peritonite; Lavagem Peritoneal; Anestésicos; Sepse; Ratos


16- ORIGINAL ARTICLE

PERITONEUM

Histological features of peritoneal lavage with ropivacaine in rats with fecal peritonitis1 Correspondence: Marco Célio Brocco Rua Pedro Luis Zanandréa, 55 29065-610 Vitória – ES Brasil Tel.: (55 27)3325-7300 / 9982-8816 mcbrocco@uol.com.br

Características histológicas da lavagem peritoneal com ropivacaína em ratos com peritonite fecal

Marcos Célio BroccoI; Renato Santiago GomezII; Danilo Nagib Salomão PauloIII; Carlos Eduardo David de AlmeidaIV; João Florêncio de Abreu BaptistaI

IAssociate Professor, Division of Anesthesiology, Department of Surgery, Espirito Santo Federal University, Brazil. Conception, design and scientific content of the study, manuscript writing

IIAssociate Professor, Department of Surgery, Minas Gerais Federal University (UFMG), Brazil. Conception, design and scientific content of the study, manuscript writing

IIIFull Professor, EMESCAM, Espirito Santo, Brazil. Surgical procedures and critical revision

IVFellow Master degree, Surgical and Ophthalmological Applied Sciences Postgraduate Program, UFMG, Minas Gerais, Brazil. Manuscript writing and surgical procedures

Corresponde Correspondence: Marco Célio Brocco Rua Pedro Luis Zanandréa, 55 29065-610 Vitória – ES Brasil Tel.: (55 27)3325-7300 / 9982-8816 mcbrocco@uol.com.br

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To evaluate the histological features in lungs, peritoneum and liver of rats subjected to fecal peritonitis and treated with peritoneal lavage with 0.2% ropivacaine.

METHODS: Twenty Wistar rats were subjected to laparotomy 6 h after the fecal peritonitis induction with autogenous stool. Rats were randomly distributed into 4 groups: I - (n=5) Control, no treatment; II - (n=5) Drying of the abdominal cavity; III - (n=5) Abdominal cavity lavage with 3 ml 0.9% saline solution and drying; and IV - (n=5) Abdominal cavity lavage with 3 ml 0.2% ropivacaine and drying. The animals that died underwent necropsy, and the surviving ones were subjected to euthanasia on the 11th day post-surgery. Fragments of liver, lungs and peritoneum were removed for histological evaluation.

RESULTS: The animals that received peritoneal lavage (groups III and IV) showed greater survival than the drying and control groups. Lavage with ropivacaine prevented death during the observed period. Peritoneal lavage with ropivacaine maintained the architecture of the lung, peritoneum and liver without any important histological alterations. The histopathological findings analyzed correlated with greater survival of group IV.

CONCLUSION: Treatment of fecal peritonitis in rats with peritoneal lavage using 0.2% ropivacaine demonstrated a reduction in histopathological alterations related to inflammatory response and sepsis.

Key words: Peritonitis. Peritoneal Lavage. Anesthetics. Sepsis. Rats.

RESUMO

OBJETIVO: Avaliar os aspectos histopatológicos em pulmões, peritônios e fígados de ratos submetidos à peritonite fecal e tratados com lavagem peritoneal com ropivacaína a 0,2%.

MÉTODOS: Utilizou-se 20 ratos Wistar, submetidos à laparotomia 6 horas após a indução de peritonite fecal com fezes autógenas, distribuídos aleatoriamente em quatro grupos: I- (n=5) Controle, nenhum tratamento; II- (n=5) Enxugamento da cavidade abdominal; III- (n=5) Lavagem da cavidade abdominal com 3 ml de solução salina 0,9% e enxugamento ; IV- (n=5) Lavagem da cavidade abdominal com 3 ml de ropivacaína a 0,2% e enxugamento. Os animais que morreram foram necropsiados e os sobreviventes foram eutanasiados no 11º dia do pós-operatório. Retirou-se fragmentos do fígado, pulmões e do peritônio dos animais para estudo histopatológico.

RESULTADOS: Os animais que receberam lavagem peritoneal (grupos III e IV) apresentaram maior sobrevida que os grupos enxugamento e controle. A lavagem com ropivacaína impediu o óbito no período avaliado. A lavagem peritoneal com ropivacaína manteve a arquitetura do pulmão, peritônio e fígado sem alterações histológicas importantes. Os achados histopatológicos analisados foram condizentes com o maior tempo de sobrevida no grupo IV.

CONCLUSÃO: A lavagem peritoneal com ropivacaína a 0,2% no tratamento da peritonite fecal em ratos demonstrou reduzir as alterações histopatológicas relacionados à resposta inflamatória e sepse.

Palavras-chave: Peritonite. Lavagem Peritoneal. Anestésicos. Sepse. Ratos.

Introduction

The mortality and incidence rates of sepsis have increased in the last few years. In the United States, it is estimated that there is a yearly incidence of 750,000 septic patients with 28.6% mortality, which represents a cost US $16.7 billion dollars in healthcare1. Peritonitis is one of the most important causes of sepsis and death in operating rooms and intensive care units.

In peritonitis, sepsis occurs when an infectious intra­abdominal focus unleashes a systemic inflammatory response. Such a response is characterized by the activation of several systems, including complement, coagulation, kinins and fibrinolysis, cells (endothelial, leucocytes, monocytes, macrophages and mastocytes), and the release of mediators (free oxygen radicals, histamine, eicosanoids, coagulation factors, and cytokines)2,3.

The classic treatment of peritonitis is the mechanical removal of the contaminants, restoration of anatomical integrity, and systemic administration of antimicrobial drugs. The indiscriminate use of antimicrobials has contributed to the development of resistance in several strains of microorganisms. In 1946 in the United States, only 5% of staphylococci isolated from American hospitals were penicillin-resistant. In 1949, 1950, and 1959, the penicillin resistance of hospital cultures was described as 29, 50, and 80%, respectively. Currently, more than 80% of S. aureus isolated from hospitalized patients in Brazil and approximately 70% of cultures isolated from patients in the community are resistant to the natural penicillins.4

The increasing incidence of bacterial resistance associated with the difficulty of developing new antibiotics has directed studies in the use of alternative techniques in the treatment of peritonitis. Several studies investigate the modulation of the inflammatory response with the goal of increasing survival and reducing sepsis mortality. Several publications reported a broad range of anti-inflammatory actions of local anesthetics through their effects on the cells of the immune system as well as platelets, erythrocytes, and the microorganism itself5. Indeed, such agents have been utilized in the treatment of several conditions linked to inflammatory processes like interstitial cystitis, ulcerative proctitis, arthritis, herpetic infections and burns6.

The anti-inflammatory mechanism of local anesthetic action is not completely understood, but it seems to encompass a reversible interaction with the proteins and lipids of the plasma membrane as well as the regulation of metabolic cellular activity, migration, exocytosis, and phagocytosis. Thus, in our present study, we investigated the histological characteristics of liver, lung, and peritoneum fragments of rats subjected to fecal peritonitis stimulated by autogenous feces and treated with lavage of the abdominal cavity with 0.2% ropivacaine.

Methods

This study was approved by the Ethics in Research Committee of the School of Medicine of the Federal University of Minas Gerais State (UFMG) and was assigned protocol number 028/09 (COEP-CETEA). Twenty male Wistar rats originating from the EMESCAM Research Center ranged in weight between 280 and 320 g were operated on and randomly distributed into four groups of five animals each.

These animals were housed in cages of five animals each under constant environmental conditions and were fed an appropriate diet (Nuvital®) and water ad libitum. Animals were allowed a period of seven days of acclimatization before the experiment was initiated.

The animals were anesthetized by intramuscular injection of (S+) ketamine chlorhydrate (Cristalia®, Sao Paulo, Brazil) at a dose of 10 mg/kg animal weight7 in the anterior aspect of the right leg. A 16G teflon catheter was subsequently placed in the left inferior abdominal quadrant. Next, a suspension of autogenous fecal material, prepared by dilution of 2 g freshly passed feces in 17 ml saline solution, was injected into the abdominal cavity. Prior to the injection, the suspension was filtered through gauze to allow free flow though the needle. Of this suspension, 10 mL/kg animal weight was injected into the abdominal cavity7.

Six hours after the peritonitis induction, the rats were anesthetized with a mixture of xylazine chlorhydrate (10 mg/kg; Lab. König. SA®, Argentina) and (S+) ketamine chlorhydrate (50 mg/kg; Cristalia®, Sao Paulo, Brazil) and subjected to median laparotomy with an incision of approximately 2 cm in length, after which abdominal cavity examination was performed.

The animals were divided in the following groups:

Group I - (n=5) Control, no treatment; Group II - (n=5) tender drying of the contents of the abdominal cavity with dry gauze; Group III - (n=5) abdominal cavity lavage with 3 mL 0.9% saline solution and drying; and Group IV - (n=5) abdominal cavity lavage with 3 mL 0.2% ropivacaine and drying. In groups III and IV, saline solution (group III) or 0.2% ropivacaine (group IV) was injected in the cavity after drying of the abdominal cavity with dry gauze and left there for 3 minutes. During this time, the solution was carefully handled between the abdominal viscera to allow for greater contact with the peritoneum. After this procedure, the peritoneal fluid was gently dried off with dry gauze to remove the maximum amount of fluid. The abdominal wall was stitched in a single plane using mononylon (4-0).

Hydration was performed with one subcutaneous 5-mL injection of 0.9% saline solution every 24 h for two days. Analgesia was performed with subcutaneous injection of nalbuphine chlorhydrate (0.3 mg/kg animal weight) every 8 h for 2 days.

The animals that died underwent necropsy, and those that survived were euthanatized on the 11th day post-surgery with an intra-peritoneal injection of 50 mg/kg pentobarbital.

Besides survival time, liver, lung, and peritoneum fragments of the dead and euthanized animals were evaluated by histopathological studies. Collected material was fixed in 10% formaldehyde and stored in a volume of solution corresponding to 10 times the volume of the sample. Material was prepared in a Lupe® processor with 11 washes, embedded in paraffin blocks, and cut with a microtome (SLE®) at 2.5 microns followed by hematoxylin/eosin staining.

Results

Figure 1 shows that the survival of animals when peritoneal lavage was performed was greater than that of the control and drying groups. The survival curve shows a mortality of 100% in 12 hours for the animals in group I and 16 hours for the animals in group II. Group III presented 60% mortality in 24 hours. Ropivacaine lavage prevented death until the last day of monitoring in all animals in this group.


The lung fragments of the rats that did not receive treatment (Group I - control) presented with diffuse bronchopneumonia, filling of the alveolar spaces by macrophages and monocytes, diffuse alveolar hemorrhage, and thickening of alveolar septa (Figure 2A). The presence of an intense lymphohistoplasmacytic and neutrophilic exudate in the interior of the respiratory bronchioli (Figure 2B) was also observed. Macrophage foam cells and neutrophils were present within alveolar spaces (Figure 2C). In addition, several hemosiderophages were visualized in the lung parenchyma (Figure 2D).


The fragments extracted from the peritoneum of animals in the control group presented characteristics of diffuse peritonitis (Figure 3A) with intense neutrophilic and plasmacytic infiltrate (Figure 3B and C).


The fragments of rat liver in this group presented with marked acute inflammatory reaction with fibrino-necro-leukocytic exudate in the visceral peritoneum and hepatic capsule surrounding fecal-like material (Figure 4).


The animals in the drying group presented with characteristics of pulmonary lesions similar to those of the control group, with diffuse bronchopneumonia and filling of the alveolar spaces with macrophages, neutrophils, and monocytes (Figure 5) in addition to diffuse alveolar hemorrhage and thickening of alveolar septa.


The fragments extracted from liver and peritoneum of the animals in the drying group also presented characteristics similar to the control group, with intense intra-parenchymal hepatic infiltrate of mononuclear cells (Figure 6) and intense diffuse fibrino-purulent peritonitis (Figure 7).



The animals in group III presented lungs with preserved architecture, intact alveolar spaces, and discrete and nonspecific alterations (Figure 8A). Pulmonary parenchyma was found with lymphocytic infiltrate in peribronchial nodular disposition (Figure 8B).


The histological sections of the liver also presented preserved architecture with a discrete mononuclear infiltrate (Figure 9). The peritoneum fragments of the animals in this group presented discrete histological alterations (Figure 10A) with neutrophilic and plasmacytic exudate (Figure 10B).



The animals in group IV presented lungs with preserved architecture and intact alveolar spaces that were discrete and nonspecific within the limits of normalcy (Figure 11). The fragments of the visceral peritoneum presented discrete and nonspecific alterations as well (Figure 12). We did not observe any inflammatory response in the several histological sections examined. The hepatic fragments were found to be within the limits of normalcy (Figure 13).




Discussion

Previous studies demonstrated a reduction in rat fecal peritonitis mortality when the animals were treated with lavage containing lidocaine8 and bupivacaine9. Ropivacaine, despite presenting an anti-inflammatory and antimicrobial effect more discrete than the other anesthetics10, also prevented group IV mortality. The histological characteristics of the fragments of the organs evaluated are consistent with the greater survival of group IV animals.

The local anesthetics seem to act in several steps of the inflammatory cascade. Several studies demonstrated a reversible and dose-dependent reduction in the adhesion of leukocytes to the vascular walls11,12. Leukocyte migration also seemed to be affected by the anesthetics, most likely due to the action in the cytoskeleton or by attenuation of the release of chemotaxis agents by the leukocytes13.

The local anesthetics produce a reversible and dose-dependent inhibition of granulocyte phagocytosis. Systemic intravenous administration of lidocaine at the recommended doses for anti-arrhythmic treatment significantly lowered the phagocytic activity of leukocytes of the synovial fluid of articulations with synovitis14. However, experiments with ropivacaine demonstrated discrete or null effects on the phagocytic activity of granulocytes, in contrast to other local anesthetics10. The most likely mechanism to explain the inhibition of phagocytic activity is the decrease in expression of the receptor at the surface of leucocytes15 and inhibition of the activity of actin-myosin filaments16.

Despite the controversy surrounding the efficacy of peritoneal lavage in the medical literature17,18, our present experiment has shown that peritoneal lavage does lower mortality. The local anesthetics increase survival in several studies on experimental models with mice19 and dogs20 even when administered systemically.

Besides the modulatory effects of inflammation, the local anesthetics have proven antimicrobial action. Data in the literature shows that the antimicrobial potency of local anesthetics is essentially correlated with the concentration and, to a lesser degree, the chemical structure, and these anesthetics might be effective against most bacteria when the concentrations are sufficiently high21.

The precise mechanism of antibacterial action is not yet clear but can be correlated to the interaction between local anesthetics with the bacterial wall or with macromolecules at the cellular surface of bacteria. Electrostatic interactions between local cationic anesthetics and anionic components in the membrane could contribute to functional alterations at the cellular membrane level, reducing membrane fluidity22.

Conclusion

The peritoneal lavage with 0.2% ropivacaine, which was used in the treatment of fecally-induced peritonitis with autogenous stool in rats, was shown to decrease the histopathological findings related to the inflammatory response and sepsis.

Received: September 27, 2011

Review: November 29, 2011

Accepted: December 23, 2011

Conflict of interest: none

Financial source: none

1 Research performed at the Laboratory of the Division of Surgical Principles, Department of Surgery, School of Science, Santa Casa de Misericordia de Vitoria (EMESCAM), Espirito Santo, Brazil.

  • 1. Angus DC, Linde-Zwirble WT, Lidicker J, Clermont G, Carcillo J, Pinsky MR. Epidemiology of severe sepsis in the United States: analysis of incidence, outcome, and associated costs of care. Crit Care Med. 2001;29:1303-10.
  • 2. Garrido AG, Figueiredo LFP, Rocha and Silva M. Experimental models of sepsis and septic shock. Acta Cir Bras. 2004;19:82-8.
  • 3. Dellinger RP. Inflammation and coagulation: implications for the septic patient. Clin Infect Dis. 2003;36:1259-65.
  • 4. Tavares, W. Problem gram-positive bacteria: resistance in staphylococci, enterococci, and pneumococci to antimicrobial drugs. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop. 2000;33:281-301.
  • 5. Batai I, Kerenyi M, Tekeres M. The impact of drugs used in anesthesia on bacteria. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 1999;16:425-40.
  • 6. Cassuto J, Sinclair R, Bonderovic M. Anti-inflammatory properties of local anesthetics and their present and potential clinical implications. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2006;50:265-82.
  • 7. Petroianu A, Carvalho and Carneiro BGM, Rodrigues FHOC, Rocha RF. Assessment of peritoneal reinfection after fecal peritonitis in rats. Rev Col Bras Cir. 2004;31:90-4.
  • 8. Brocco MC, Paulo DN, Baptista JF, Ferrari TA, de Azevedo TC, da Silva AL. Effects of peritoneal lavage with lidocaine on survival of rats with fecal peritonitis. Acta Cir Bras. 2008;23:42-7.
  • 9. Brocco MC, Paulo DN, Baptista JF, Carraretto AR, Ferrari TA, de Azevedo TC, da Silva AL. Effects of peritoneal lavage with bupivacaine on survival of mice with fecal peritonitis. Rev Bras Anestesiol. 2008;58:474-9.
  • 10. Kiefer RT, Ploppa A, Krueger WA, Plank M, Nohé B, Haeberle HA, Unertl K, Dieterich HJ. Local anesthetics impair human granulocyte phagocytosis activity, oxidative burst, and CD11b expression in response to Staphylococcus aureus. Anesthesiology. 2003;98:842-8.
  • 11. Schmidt W, Schmidt H, Bauer H, Gebhard MM, Martin E. Influence of lidocaine on endotoxin-induced leukocyte endothelial cell adhesion and macromolecular leakage in vivo. Anesthesiology. 1997;87:617-24.
  • 12. Azuma Y, Shinohara M, Wang PL, Suese Y, Yasuda H, Ohura K. Comparison of inhibitory effects of local anesthetics on immune functions of neutrophils. Int J Immunopharmacol. 2000;22:789-96.
  • 13. Mio Y, Fukuda N, Kusakari Y, Tanifuji Y, Kurihara S. Bupivacaine attenuates contractility by decreasing sensitivity of myofilaments to Ca2+ in rat ventricular muscle. Anesthesiology. 2002;97:1168-77.
  • 14. Paul H, Clayburne G, Schumacher HR. Lidocaine inhibits leukocyte migration and phagocytosis in monosodium urate crystal-induced synovitis in dogs. J Rheumatol. 1983;10:434-9.
  • 15. Welters ID, Menzebach A, Langefeld TW, Menzebach M, Hempelmann G. Inhibitory effects of S-(-) and R-(þ) bupivacaine on neutrophil function. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2001;45:570-5.
  • 16. Tsuda Y, Mashimo T, Yoshiya I, Kaseda K, Harada Y, Yanagida T. Direct inhibition of the actomyosin motility by local anesthetics in vitro. Biophys J. 1996;71:2733-41.
  • 17. Whiteside OJ, Tytherleigh MG, Thrush S, Farouk R, Galland RB. Intra-operative peritoneal lavage - who does it and why? Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2005;87:225-8.
  • 18. Torres OJM, Macedo EL, Melo TCM, Costa JVG, Nunes PMS, Viana RMM, Dietz UA. Fecal peritonitis in rats: efficacy of peritoneal lavage with a solution of sodium chloride 0.9%. Acta Cir Bras. 1999;14:65-8.
  • 19. Gallos G, Jones DR, Nasr SH, Emala CW, Lee HT. Local anesthetics reduce mortality and protect against renal and hepatic dysfunction in murine septic peritonitis. Anesthesiology. 2004;101:902-11.
  • 20. Fletcher JR, Ramwell PW. E. coli endotoxin shock in the dog; treatment with lidocaine or indomethacin. Br J Pharmacol. 1978;64:85-91.
  • 21. Feldman JM, Chapin-Robertson K, Turner J. Do agents used for epidural analgesia have antimicrobial properties? Reg Anesth. 1994;19:43-7.
  • 22. Tanji K, Ohta Y, Kawato S, Mizushima T, Natori S, Sekimizu K. Decrease by psychotropic drugs and local anaesthetics of membrane fluidity measured by fluorescence anisotropy in Escherichia coli. J Pharm Pharmacol. 1992;44:1036-7.
  • Correspondence:
    Marco Célio Brocco
    Rua Pedro Luis Zanandréa, 55
    29065-610 Vitória – ES Brasil
    Tel.: (55 27)3325-7300 / 9982-8816
  • Publication Dates

    • Publication in this collection
      27 Feb 2012
    • Date of issue
      Feb 2012

    History

    • Received
      27 Sept 2011
    • Accepted
      23 Dec 2011
    • Reviewed
      29 Nov 2011
    Sociedade Brasileira para o Desenvolvimento da Pesquisa em Cirurgia https://actacirbras.com.br/ - São Paulo - SP - Brazil
    E-mail: actacirbras@gmail.com