SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.30 issue2Low-level laser therapy modulates musculoskeletal loss in a skin burn model in ratsPreconditioning with mono and polyunsaturated fatty acids and low-intensity electrical stimulation. Effects on skin repair in rats author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

  • text new page (beta)
  • English (pdf)
  • Article in xml format
  • How to cite this article
  • SciELO Analytics
  • Curriculum ScienTI
  • Automatic translation

Indicators

Related links

Share


Acta Cirurgica Brasileira

Print version ISSN 0102-8650On-line version ISSN 1678-2674

Acta Cir. Bras. vol.30 no.2 São Paulo Feb. 2015

http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0102-86502015002000003 

Original Articles

Which is the best route of administration for cell therapy in experimental model of small-for size syndrome in rats?1

Lucas Souto Nacif I  

Amanda Olivotti Ferreira II  

Durvanei Augusto Maria III  

Márcia Saldanha Kubrusly IV  

Nilza Molan V  

Eleazar Chaib VI  

Luiz Carneiro D'Albuquerque VII  

Wellington Andraus VIII  

IFellow PhD degree and MSc degree, Postgraduate Program in Medicine (Science in Gastroenterology), Department of Gastroenterology, School of Medicine, Medical Investigation Laboratory (LIM 37), University of Sao Paulo (USP), Brazil. Carried out all experimental and surgical procedures, acquisition of data, statistical analysis, drafted the manuscript

IIMSc degree, Biochemistry, Laboratory of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Biochemistry in Biotechnology Center, Butantan Institute, Sao Paulo-SP, Brazil. Acquisition of data, designed the preparation and characterization of stem cells of the liver

IIIAssociate Professor, Laboratory of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Biochemistry in Biotechnology Center, Butantan Institute, Sao Paulo-SP, Brazil. Designed the preparation and characterization of stem cells of the liver, critical revision

IVFellow PhD degree, Postgraduate Program in Medicine (Surgical Gastroenterology), Biochemistry in Liver and Gastrointestinal Transplant Division, Department of Gastroenterology, School of Medicine, LIM 37, USP, Sao Paulo-SP, Brazil. Statistical analysis, drafted the manuscript

VBiochemistry, Liver and Gastrointestinal Transplant Division, Department of Gastroenterology, School of Medicine, LIM 37, USP, Sao Paulo-SP, Brazil. Laboratory analysis, technical procedures

VIAssociate Professor, Liver and Gastrointestinal Transplant Division, Department of Gastroenterology, School of Medicine, LIM 37, USP, Sao Paulo-SP, Brazil. Design of the study, manuscript writing, critical revision

VIIFull Professor and Chairman, Liver and Gastrointestinal Transplant Division, Department of Gastroenterology, School of Medicine, LIM 37, USP, Sao Paulo-SP, Brazil. Conception and design of the study, manuscript writing, critical revision

VIIIAssistant Professor, Coordinator, Liver and Gastrointestinal Transplant Division, Department of Gastroenterology, School of Medicine, LIM 37, USP, Sao Paulo-SP, Brazil. Technical procedures, manuscript writing, critical revision

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

To evaluate which is the best route of administration for cell therapy in experimental rat model of small-for size syndrome.

METHODS:

A total of 40 rats underwent partial hepatectomy (70%) that induces the small-for-size syndrome and were divided into four groups of route administration: intravenous, intraperitoneal, enteral and tracheal. The small-for-size syndrome model was designed with extended partial hepatectomy (70%). The animals were divided into four groups of routes administration: intravenous (n=10) - intravenously through the dorsal vein of the penis; intraperitoneal (n=10) - intraperitoneally in the abdominal cavity; enteral (n=10) - oroenteral with the placement of a number 4 urethral probe and maintained at third duodenal portion; tracheal (n=10) - after tracheal intubation. We track the animals and monitor them for 21 days; during this follow-up we evaluated the result of cell therapy application tracking animals using ultrasound, radiography and PET-scan. Statistical analysis was performed using GraphPad Prism Software(r). Differences were considered significant with the p<0.05. Data are presented as the median and variation for continuous variables. Comparisons between groups were made using analysis of the imaging test by the researchers.

RESULTS:

All four groups underwent partial hepatectomy of 70% liver tissue targeting the same weight of resected liver. Initially the PET-scan tests showed similarity in administered cells by different routes. However, in few days the route of intravenous administration showed to be the most appropriated to lead cells to the liver followed by enteral. The tracheal and peritoneal routes were not as much successful for this goal.

CONCLUSION:

The intravenous route is the best one to cell therapy in experimental rat model of small-for size-syndrome.

Key words: Liver Regeneration; Disease Models, Animal; Stem Cells; Rats

Introduction

The Small-for-Size Syndrome (SSS) is seen more often if the transplanted segment of the donor is <30% liver or <0.8% of body weight of the recipient1. The SSS is a complex process resulting primarily from ischemia-reperfusion injury (IRI) and portal hypertension associated with mismatch between the graft and recipient size. In the initial period, the molecular events associated with subsequent apoptosis, necrosis, proliferation and regeneration appeared in specific patterns of protein expression2-4.

The diagnosis of SSS graft is generally based on persistent hyperbilirubinemia, coagulopathy, massive ascites during subacute phase post-transplant or extensive hepatic resection2 , 5. Living donor liver transplantation can reduce the discrepancy between the number of patients on the waiting list for transplantation and the number of donor organs available.

Stem cells have three properties: self-renewal, proliferation and differentiation. They have the potential to generate large numbers of mature cells continuously throughout life6 , 7. The term refers to cells having ability to generate daughter cells with characteristics similar to the mother cell, as well as differentiate into specialized cells6 , 7. Stem cells are able to differentiate into all cell types and can be used in replacement therapies for various diseases. Embryonic and fetal liver cell lines can be an important tool for cell therapy in patients with liver disease source, as they have a high rate of differentiation into hepatocytes and bile duct cells. Although there are numerous published papers on the administration of stem cells, none of them evaluate the best route of administration. The aim of this study was to evaluate which is the best route of administration for cell therapy in experimental rat model of liver regeneration on small-for size-syndrome.

Methods

The study was designed in accordance with the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of University of São Paulo. This project was approved by the Ethics Committee, for the the Guidelines of Animal Experimentation of the University of São Paulo School of Medicine, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.

A total of 40 rats male Sprague-Dawley (SD) rats (200-250g, Biotechnology Center, Butantan Institute) were housed at 19°C ± 3°C with a 12-h (06:00-18:00 hours) artificial light cycle. Two or three animals from the same treatment group were housed per cage. The animals had free access to tap water and standard food during the entire experiment. Food intake was not measured.

Study design

The animals underwent an extended partial hepatectomy (70%) that induce the small-for-size syndrome and were divided into four groups of routes administration (Figure 1): intravenous (n=10) - intravenously through the dorsal vein of the penis; intraperitoneal (n=10) - intraperitoneally in the abdominal cavity; enteral (n=10) - oroenteral with the placement of a number 4 urethral probe and maintained at third duodenal portion; tracheal (n=10) - after tracheal intubation (Figure 2). We track the animals and monitor them for 21 days; during this follow-up we evaluated the result of cell therapy application tracking animals using ultrasound, radiography and PET-scan. All procedures began with the intraperitoneal anesthesia using 5% ketamine hydrochloride 30 mg/kg (Ketalar(r), Cristália). Animals were kept warm with a 45W, 127V halogen bulb and body temperature was monitored using a rectal digital thermometer (YSI 4000A Precision Thermometer, USA) and maintained between 35°C and 37°C.

Figure 1. The study design for four groups of different routes administration in experimental small-for-size syndrome. 

Figure 2. The four groups of different routes of administration in experimental small-for-size syndrome. A. Intravenous; B. Intraperitoneal; C. Enteral; D. Tracheal. 

All animals were anesthetized and underwent a surgical intervention with median laparotomy extending for approximately 4 cm from the xiphoid process; the left and median liver lobes were removed after the central ligature with 4-0 cotton. The right upper, middle and lower lobes were ligated in the common right lobe pedicle of the liver using cotton yarn performing ischemia and subsequent necrosis. Both lobes of the liver and the liver tissue pieces around the intrahepatic portion of the inferior vena cava remained together. These two hepatic lobes represent about 30% of the total liver mass (Figure 3). The remnant liver was confirmed with weight measurements. The abdominal incision was sutured with Mononylon(r) 4.0.

Figure 3. Surgical technique of experimental small-for-size syndrome in rats. 

Incorporation of Propidium Iodide (PI) and reading sample

The fixed and previously stored samples were centrifuged at 2000 rpm for 5 minutes. The supernatant was discarded, the cells resuspended in 1 ml flow cytometry buffer and centrifuged again. After centrifugation, the supernatant was discarded and the cells resuspended in PI solution prepared from 5 ml PBS (sodium phosphate buffer pH 7.4) to which were added 100 5μL Triton (0.01% v/v) and 50μL of RNAse (2mg/mL) and 20μL of propidium iodide (5mg/mL). Then, if the held data acquisition FACSCalibur flow cytometer on 10.000 events for analysis and Win Mdi 2.8 program was used.

Evaluation of routs administration of stem cell in rats

Initially, we performed the analysis in the seventh day after surgery; follow by second analysis in fifteenth day and subsequent twentieth day for establishing and detecting the stem cell by PET-scan, ultrasonography and radiography for each route administration group.

Literature review

A literature review was performed with the Mesh-terms "Liver regeneration"; "Disease models, Animal"; "Stem cells" and "Rats". The electronic search was held of the Medline-PubMed, in English. The search was completed in September 2014.

Statistics

Statistical analysis was performed using GraphPad Prism Software(r). Differences were considered significant with the p<0.05. Data are presented as the median and variation for continuous variables. Comparisons between groups were made using analysis of the imaging test by the researchers.

Results

A total of 40 rats underwent partial hepatectomy that induces the small-for-size syndrome and the four groups of routes administration were evaluated in three moments (seventh, fifteenth and twenty-first day). They were carried out as follows: intravenous group (n=10), intraperitoneal group (n=10), enteral group (n=10) and tracheal group (n=10).

All four groups underwent partial hepatectomy of 70% liver tissue targeting the same weight of resected liver. The routes of administration for cell therapy in experimental rat model of small-for size syndrome for each group were evaluated using ultrasound, radiography and displayed below the PET-scan (Figure 4). During follow-up of twenty-one days, the cells remained alive after administration in all groups showed by PET-scan.

Figure 4. PET-scan evaluation of the route of administration for cell therapy in experimental rat model of small-for size-syndrome. A. Intravenous; B. Peritoneal; C. Tracheal; D. Enteral. Note: The animal above is the twenty-first day and down the fifteenth day post administration. 

Initially it was observed in PET-scan tests a similarity between administered cells by different routes. However, after few days the intravenous route showed to be more appropriated to lead cells to the liver, followed by enteral route. The tracheal and peritoneal routes were not as much efficient for this ultimate goal. The evaluation by ultrasound and radiography of the rats, in the different groups showed no differences to show the marked stem cell (Figure 5).

Figure 5. The ultrasound and radiography evaluation the route of administration for cell therapy in experimental rat model of small-for size syndrome. Note: The animal above is the twenty-first day post administration. 

In the laboratory analysis, we observed an elevation of liver enzymes (AST and ALT), slight change of total and direct bilirubin, and extending the coagulation time. Forty percent of the cases presented incoagulable value in the sample (Table 1).

Table 1. Findings of the laboratory biochemical. 

Parameters
AST(U/L)    150.44 (range, 122 – 210)
ALT(U/L)  45.44 (range,  26-70)
TB (U/L) 0.065 (range, 0.01 – 0.1)
DB (U/L) 0.021 (range, 0.01 – 0.04)
AP (U/L) 121.15 (range, 28.4 – 255)
GGT (U/L) 1.3 (range, 0.8 – 2.1)
PT (%)*  65.2 (range, 27 – 81)
INR range* 1.53 (range, 1.14 – 2.86)

Note: The median and variation. AST, aspartate transaminase; ALT, alanine transaminase; TB, total bilirubin; BD, direct bilirubin; GGT, gamma glutamyl transferase; AP, alkaline phosphatase; PT, prothrombin time; INR range. *Forty percent of the cases presented incoagulable value in the sample and INR>5.

A literature review was performed with the Mesh-terms: "Liver regeneration"; "Disease models, Animal"; "Stem cells" and "Rats" in order to see the administration route used by the authors in this specific field. The initial review search showed 69 articles in Medline-PubMed with the specific Mesh-terms and we analyzed the methods used in each abstract as showed in Figure 6.

Figure 6. The literature review performed with the Mesh-terms: Liver regeneration; Disease models, Animal; Stem cells and Rats showed 69 articles in Medline-PubMed. 

Discussion

To our knowledge, this is the first study that evaluates the routs of stem cells administration in an experimental rat model. Although authors use published references to copy methods, it is indeed important to know which is the best route to cell therapy administration or transplantation in experimental models of liver regeneration. All four groups underwent partial hepatectomy of 70% targeting the same weight of resected liver. Initially, we observed in PET-scan tests a similarity in administered cells by different routes, but after 21 days the intravenous route administration showed to be the best one, with a bigger amount of cells in the liver site.

It is interesting to notice that the enteral route was better than peritoneal and tracheal routes, and it showed to be also a good route of administration. Other important point is that the enteral route of administration (gavage tube) was placed after the stomach, preventing the acid acting on the cells.

It is remarkable that the tracheal route group showed a representative amount of viable marked stem cells in the liver. Although we did not find any study using this way of administration in our review, this is also an option for specific studies, and it demonstrates the high absorption capacity of the animal in different sites when stem cells are administrated. By the literature review with 69 articles in Medline-PubMed, the most common route of infusion was intravenous in 62% of specific articles, followed by intraesplenic (12%) and intraperitoneal (12%).

Salomone et al.6 showed the efficacy of stem cell transplantation in rats with acetaminophen liver injury on Sprague-Dawley rats that were administrated 300mg/kg of acetaminophen intraperitoneally. The therapy was performed in six rats that received the infusion of stem cells via the caudal vein. They injected around 200.000 cells suspended in 1 mL of saline solution and six rats were administrated only saline. In this study, as an example, the authors used the intravenous administration.

The hepatocyte transplantation in animal models showed the intraportal route has been used in animal models of metabolic liver disorders. However, the peritoneal cavity and subcutaneous tissues have been investigated and these sites do not efficiently support cell viability for long periods because the transplanted cells have no direct and instant access to oxygen and nutrients8. Another study demonstrated the contribution of mature hepatocytes to small hepatocyte-like progenitor cells in retrorsine-exposed rats with chimeric livers that was administrated via intraportal7.

The spleen has proven to be also a good site for hepatocyte engraftment. The hepatocytes infused into the portal vein or infused into the spleen undergo blood flow-mediated translocation to the hepatic sinusoids. However, a large proportion remains in the spleen, which can serve as a site for long-term survival and function of engrafted hepatocytes. Intrasplenic hepatocyte transplantation has been performed in animal models of chronic liver failure8.

Ultimately, the intravenous route of administration was more appropriate to aim in the liver place, followed by enteral. All four routes tested showed to lead cells to the liver even the tracheal route. The intravenous route, as the most used, confirmed to be the best route for cells administration in rats models for liver regeneration.

Conclusion

The intravenous route is the best one to cell therapy in experimental rat model of small-for size-syndrome.

References

1. Nishizaki T, Ikegami T, Hiroshige S, Hashimoto K, Uchiyama H, Yoshizumi T, Kishikawa K, Shimada M, Sugimachi K.Small graft for living donor liver transplantation. Ann Surg. 2001;233:575-80. PMID: 11303141. [ Links ]

2. Wu J, Tang Q, Shen J, Yao A, Wang F, Pu L, Yu Y, Li X, Li G, Zhang F, Sun B, Kong L, Li D, Zhang Y, Guo X, Wang X. Comparative proteome profile during the early period of small-for-size liver transplantation in rats revealed the protective role of Prdx5. J Hepatol. 2010 Jul;53(1):73-83. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2010.01.032. [ Links ]

3. Di Domenico S, Santori G, Traverso N, Balbis E, Furfaro A, Grillo F, Gentile R, Bocca B, Gelli M, Andorno E, Dahame A, Cottalasso D, Valente U. Early effects of portal flow modulation after extended liver resection in rat. Dig Liver Dis. 2011 Oct;43(10):814-22. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2011.05.018. [ Links ]

4. Hessheimer AJ, Escobar B, Muñoz J, Flores E, Gracia-Sancho J, Taurá P, Fuster J, Rimola A, García-Valdecasas JC, Fondevila C. Somatostatin therapy protects porcine livers in small-for-size liver transplantation. Am J Transplant. 2014 Aug;14(8):1806-16. doi: 10.1111/ajt.12758. [ Links ]

5. Li J, Liang L, Ma T, Yu X, Chen W, Xu G, Liang T. Sinusoidal microcirculatory changes after small-for size liver transplantation in rats. Transplant Int. 2010 Sep;23(9):924-33. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-2277.2010.01058.x. [ Links ]

6. Salomone F, Barbagallo I, Puzzo L, Piazza C, Li Volti G. Efficacy of adipose tissue-mesenchymal stem cell transplantation in rats with acetaminophen liver injury. Stem Cell Res. 2013 Nov;11(3):1037-44. doi: 10.1016/j.scr.2013.07.003. [ Links ]

7. Chen YH, Chang MH, Chien CS, Wu SH, Yu CH, Chen HL. Contribution of mature hepatocytes to small hepatocyte-like progenitor cells in retrorsine-exposed rats with chimeric livers. Hepatology. 2013 Mar;57(3):1215-24. doi: 10.1002/hep.26104. [ Links ]

8. Weber A, Groyer-Picard MT, Franco D, Dagher I. Hepatocyte transplantation in animal models. Liver Transplant. 2009 Jan;15(1):7-14. doi: 10.1002/lt.21670. [ Links ]

Financial source: none

1Research performed at Liver and Gastrointestinal Transplant Division, Department of Gastroenterology, School of Medicine, Medical Investigation Laboratory (LIM 37), University of Sao Paulo (USP) and Biotechnology Center, Butantan Institute, Sao Paulo-SP, Brazil. Part of PhD degree thesis, Postgraduate Program in Medicine (Science in Gastroenterology). Tutor: Wellington Andraus.

Received: October 28, 2014; Revised: December 26, 2014; Accepted: January 20, 2015

Correspondence: Wellington Andraus Divisão de Transplantes de Fígado e Órgãos do Aparelho Digestivo Departamento de Gastroenterologia-USP Rua Dr. Enéas de Carvalho Aguiar, 255/9º andar, salas 9113/9114 05403-900 São Paulo - SP Brasil Tel.: (55 11)2661-3323 Fax: (55 11)2661-9008 wellington@usp.br

Conflict of interest: none

Creative Commons License This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.