Need for orthodontic treatment among Brazilian adolescents: evaluation based on public health

Abstracts

OBJECTIVE:

To identify the prevalence and the severity of malocclusions and to analyze factors associated with the need for orthodontic treatment of Brazilian adolescents.

METHODS:

This exploratory, cross-sectional study was carried out based on secondary data from the national epidemiological survey on oral health in Brazil (2002-2003). Socio-demographic conditions, self-perception, and the existence and degree of malocclusion, using the Dental Aesthetic Index, were evaluated in 16,833 adolescent Brazilians selected by probabilistic sample by conglomerates. The dependent variable need orthodontic treatment was estimated from the severity of malocclusion. The magnitude and direction of the association in bivariate and multivariate analyzes from a Robust Poisson regression was estimated.

RESULTS:

The majority of the adolescents needed orthodontic treatment (53.2%). In the multivariate analysis, the prevalence of the need for orthodontic treatment was larger among females, non-whites, those that perceived a need for treatment, and those that perceived their appearance as normal, bad, or very bad. The need for orthodontic treatment was smaller among those that lived in the Northeast and Central West macro-regions compared to those living in Southeast Brazil and it was also smaller among those that perceived their chewing to be normal or their oral health to be bad or very bad.

CONCLUSIONS:

There was a high prevalence of orthodontic treatment need among adolescents in Brazil and this need was associated with demographic and subjective issues. The high prevalence of orthodontic needs in adolescents is a challenge to the goals of Brazil's universal public health system.

Oral health; Malocclusion; Adolescent; Public health

OBJETIVO:

Identificar a prevalência e a gravidade das más oclusões e fatores associados com a necessidade de tratamento ortodôntico dos adolescentes brasileiros.

MÉTODOS:

Estudo transversal feito com base nos dados da pesquisa epidemiológica nacional em saúde bucal no Brasil (2002-2003). Condições sociodemográficas, autopercepção, existência e nível de gravidade da má oclusão, com o uso do Índice de Estética Dentária, foram avaliados em 16.833 adolescentes brasileiros selecionados por amostra probabilística por conglomerados. A variável dependente necessidade de tratamento ortodôntico foi estimada a partir da gravidade da má oclusão. A magnitude e a direção das associações nas análises bivariada e multivariada foram estimadas pela regressão de Poisson.

RESULTADOS:

A maioria dos adolescentes apresentou necessidade de tratamento ortodôntico (53,2%). Na análise multivariada, a prevalência da necessidade de tratamento ortodôntico foi maior entre as mulheres, os não brancos, aqueles que autopercebiam a necessidade de tratamento e aqueles que autopercebiam sua aparência como normal, ruim ou muito ruim. A necessidade de tratamento ortodôntico foi menor entre aqueles que viviam nas regiões Nordeste e Centro-Oeste em comparação com aqueles da Sudeste e também menor entre aqueles que autopercebiam sua mastigação como normal e sua saúde bucal como ruim ou muito ruim.

CONCLUSÕES:

O estudo identificou uma prevalência elevada da necessidade de tratamento ortodôntico em adolescentes no Brasil, associada com questões demográficas e subjetivas de saúde bucal. A alta prevalência de necessidades ortodônticas entre adolescentes é um desafio para o Sistema Único de Saúde (SUS) do Brasil.

Saúde bucal; Má oclusão; Adolescente; Saúde pública

Introduction

Brazil has great regional and social inequalities. To address such disparities, the New Constitution of Brazil (1988) recognized health as a right of each citizen and the responsibility of the government, and established the ideological basis for the creation of Brazil's universal public health care system, the Unified System of Health (SUS). This has increased access to healthcare for a great part of the Brazilian population.¹ At Brazil's 11th National Health Conference in 2000, the principles of comprehensive care, humanization and equity were restated as goals for the consolidation of SUS. Additionally, the need to strengthen collective actions regarding public health services and to assure governmental compliance with its responsibility to provide universal, comprehensive, and equitable health care to all Brazilians was stressed.^{1 - 3}

Previous studies have evaluated oral health status, indicating the need for implementation of health public policies for improvement of these conditions and universality of health, considering socioeconomic characteristics.^{4 - 6} Malocclusion, the third most prevalent oral pathology has been considered a priority in global public health and has many adverse consequences, such as psychosocial maladjustment, periodontal disease and unfavorable mastication.⁷

Malocclusions are not classified as diseases and are difficult to define, unlike other issues of oral health,⁸ highlighting the importance of a clear definition, as well as an improvement in diagnostic criteria for obtaining epidemiological data regarding these issues in order to facilitate the planning of public health prevention and care.⁹ Therefore, there was a need to develop an epidemiological instrument to identify and classify malocclusions and recognize the dental and aesthetic need for orthodontic treatment of a given population to compare such needs among populations or longitudinally. In response to this need, Jenny & Cons developed the Dental Aesthetic Index (DAI) in 1986.¹⁰ It quantifies aesthetic factors and clinical presentations, using both subjective and objective measures to produce a single numerical value that reflects all aspects of malocclusion.⁷ The DAI is composed of ten variables and results in a numerical value that classifies the individual on a scale of 13 to 80, which can be categorized into cutoff points.¹⁰ DAI has been proposed by the World Health Organization (WHO) for the evaluation of malocclusions at the age of 12 and in 15-19-year-old adolescents.

Malocclusion has been singled out as an important problem of oral health among adolescents in Brazil, with prevalence rates above 40%.^{11 , 12} At national level, besides the high prevalence, greater severity of malocclusion among teenagers has been associated with the worst socioeconomic conditions and subjective conditions of oral health, based on data from the epidemiological survey of the oral health conditions of the Brazilian population in 2010.¹³ In the years 2002 and 2003, upon the recommendation of WHO, the Ministry of Health in Brazil completed an epidemiological study of oral health conditions in Brazil called SB2000, currently renamed Project SB Brazil 2002-2003.¹⁴ Despite more than a decade after the achievement and dissemination of the results of the SB Brazil 2002-2003 and running a new survey in 2010, no studies were identified in the literature that recorded the prevalence of malocclusion and associated factors with the need for orthodontic treatment among Brazilian adolescents, not allowing comparisons and identification of improvements that have occurred over the years. In this context, this study examined the prevalence and severity of malocclusion and factors associated with the need for orthodontic treatment of Brazilian adolescents, using data from Project SB Brazil 2002-2003 and contextualizing those data within the public health movement in Brazil.

Method

This exploratory, cross-sectional study was carried out based on secondary data from the national epidemiological survey on oral health (SB Brazil 2002-2003). This survey, conducted by the Ministry of Health, investigated different oral health conditions of 108,921 Brazilians from different age groups (18-36 months of age, 5, 12, 15-19, 35-44 and 65-74 years old), living in 250 municipalities of urban and rural areas of all five geographical macro-regions of the country.

The participants were examined and interviewed in their homes. Data was collected regarding their socio-economic conditions, their use of dental services, and their self-perception of their oral health. Assessments of conditions and problems of oral health were based on criteria established by the World Health Organization (WHO) in 1997. A probabilistic cluster sample was used. In each macro-region of the country, cities were randomly selected based on their inclusion in five stratum defined by population size (less than 5,000 habitants, 5,001-10,000, 10,001-50,000, 50,001-100,000, and more than 100,000). All state capitals were included prior to the random sorting process, and hence were not included in this process. Following the random selection of cities, neighborhoods and households were also randomly selected. The response rate for the age group of 15-19 year olds was 84.5%, resulting in the inclusion of 16,833 adolescents in the survey.¹⁵ Dentists, who were trained and calibrated (k≥0,61) in accordance with the criteria established by the WHO in 1997, carried out at-home interviews and exams.¹⁴ The present study is based on data from this sample of adolescents between the ages of 15 and 19 years.

The dependent variable, the need for orthodontic treatment (NOT), was constructed based on the DAI (Table 1) and has four possible outcomes: lack of normality or mild malocclusions/no need for orthodontic treatment (DAI<25), defined malocclusion/elective NOT (DAI=26-30), severe malocclusion/highly desirable NOT (DAI=31-35), and very severe or disabling malocclusion/essential NOT (DAI>36).¹⁰ In accordance with the possible outcomes of DAI, this numerical score was categorized into two categories for the dependent variable of this study: no NOT (DAI<25) and NOT (DAI>25).¹¹

Table 1.
Descriptive analysis of Brazilians aged 15-19 years (2002-2003) according to demographic variables.

	n	%
Sex
Male	7,015	41.7
Female	9,818	58.3
Age
15-16	8,115	48.2
17-19	8,718	51.8
Self-reported skin color
White	7,071	42.1
Non-white	9,725	57.9
Place of residence
Rural	2,244	13.3
Urban	14,569	86.7
Brazilian macro-region
Southeast	2,981	17.7
North	3,877	23.0
Northeast	3,998	23.8
South	3,841	22.8
Midwest	2,136	12.7

The independent variables tested were socio-demographics (sex, age, self-reported race, place of residence, macro-region) and subjective conditions (self-perceived need for treatment, oral health, appearance, chewing perception, effect of oral health on relationships). The variable sex (male, female) was maintained in its original form from the original data bank, age was re-categorized into two sets (15-16 years old and 17-19 years old), self-declared skin color was re-categorized into white and non-white categories. Location of residence (urban or rural) and macro-region of Brazil (North, Northeast, South, Southeast, Central-West) were maintained in their original form.

Factors associated with the dependent variable were identified. Analyses were conducted using the software PASW (r) (Predictive Analytics Software) version 17.0 for Windows (Statistics for Windows, Version 17.0. SPSS Inc. Chicago, EUA). Significant associations between dependent and independent variables were verified using the chi-square test considering the value for rejection of the null hypothesis to be p<0.05 in bivariate analysis. The magnitude and direction of the association in bivariate and multivariate analyses from a Robust Poisson regression were estimated, and a prevalence ratio (PR) with a confidence interval of 95% was calculated. Data collection was conducted in accordance with the ethical principles contained in the Resolution of the National Health Advisory Board (CNS), nº 196/95, nº 581/2000 of the Brazilian Ministry of Health.¹⁴

Results

The majority of the 16,833 adolescents were females between 17 and 19 years old, self-identified as white and living in urban zones (Table 1). Regarding the subjective conditions, most of the adolescents perceived the need for treatment and their oral health as good or excellent (Table 2). There was a greater prevalence of crowding and abnormal molar ratios in the evaluation of components of the DAI. The prevalence of need for orthodontic treatment was 53.2% (Table 3).

Table 2.
Descriptive analysis of Brazilians aged 15-19 years (2002-2003) according to subjective variables

	n	%
Self-perceived need for treatment
No	3,811	22.9
Yes	12,810	77.1
Self-perceived oral health status
Great/good	8,408	53.0
Normal	5,673	35.8
Bad/very bad	1,780	11.2
Self-perception of appearance
Great/good	9,264	58.4
Normal	4,789	30.2
Bad/very bad	1,815	11.4
Self-perception of chewing
Great/good	12,293	76.4
Normal	2,706	16.8
Bad/very bad	1,091	6.8
Self-perception of speech
Great/good	13,630	85.7
Normal	1,734	10.9
Bad/very bad	535	3.4
Self-perception of relationships
Not affected	11,871	79.3
Affected	3,104	20.7

Table 3.
Descriptive analysis of Brazilians aged 15-19 years (2002-2003) according to DENTAL AESTHETIC INDEX variables.

	n	%
Crowding in the anterior segment of the jaw
None	10,042	59.7
One segment	4,189	24.9
Two segments	2,602	15.4
Misalignment of the anterior upper jaw
<2 mm	15,262	91.7
≥2 mm	1,384	8.3
Misalignment of the anterior lower jaw
<2 mm	16,058	96.2
≥2 mm	634	3.8
Maxillary overjet
<4 mm	13,475	82.5
≥4 mm	2,857	17.5
Mandibular overjet
<4 mm	16,673	99.8
≥4 mm	33	0.2
Anterior spacing
None	13,237	78.6
One segment	2,564	15.2
Two segments	1,032	6.1
Medial diastema (gaps)
0 mm	14,185	85.6
≥1 mm	2,389	14.4
Number of missing teeth in upper jaw
None	16,002	95.1
One or more	831	4.9
Number of missing teeth in lower jaw
None	16,343	97.1
One or more	490	2.9
Anterior open bite
<3 mm	16,137	95.9
≥3 mm	612	3.6
Molar ratios
Normal	7,918	47.0
Half cusp	5,996	35.6
Full cusp	2,518	15.0
Normative need for orthodontic treatment
Absent	7,873	46.8
Present	8,960	53.2

In the bivariate analysis, the need of orthodontic treatment was associated with the following variables: sex, skin color, macro-region, and self-reporting of the need for treatment, oral health, chewing, speech, and relationships with others (Table 4).

Table 4.
Bivariate analysis of factors associated with the necessity for orthodontic treatment in 15-19 year old Brazilians, 2002-2003.

	Yes		No		PR (95%CI)	p
	n	%	n	%
Sex
Male	3,819	54.4	3,196	45.6	1
Female	5,141	52.4	4,677	47.6	1.01 (1.00-1.02)	<0.01
Age
15-16	4,338	53.5	3,777	46.5	1
17-19	4,622	53.0	4,096	47.0	0.99 (0.98-1.00)	0.56
Self-declared skin color
White	3,690	52.2	3,381	47.8	1
Non-white	5,254	54.0	4,471	46.0	1.01 (1.00-1.02)	0.01
Location of residence
Rural	1,199	53.4	1,045	46.6	1
Urban	7,753	53.2	6,816	46.8	1.00 (0.98-1.01)	0.84
Brazilian macro-region
Southeast	1,616	54.2	1,365	45.8	1
North	2,083	53.7	1,794	46.3	0.99 (0.98-1.01)	0.69
Northeast	2,134	53.4	1,864	46.6	0.99 (0.97-1.01)	0.49
South	2,068	53.8	1,773	46.2	0.99 (0.98-1.01)	0.76
Midwest	1,059	49.6	1,077	50.4	0.97 (0.95-0.98)	<0.01
Self-per2ception of need for treatment
No	1,862	48.9	1,949	51.1	1
Yes	6,992	54.6	5,818	45.4	1.03 (1.02-1.05)	<0.01
Self-perception of oral health status
Great/good	4,210	50.1	4,198	49.9	1
Normal	3,204	56.5	2,469	43.5	1.04 (1.03-1.05)	<0.01
Bad/very bad	1,025	57.6	755	42.4	1.05 (1.03-1.06)	<0.01
Self-perception of appearance
Great/good	4,473	48.3	4,791	51.7	1
Normal	2,791	58.3	1,998	41.7	1.06 (1.05-1.07)	<0.01
Bad/very bad	1,184	65.2	631	34.8	1.11 (1.09-1.13)	<0.01
Self-perception of chewing
Great/good	6,445	52.4	5,848	47.6	1
Normal	1,474	54.5	1,232	45.5	1.01 (1.00-1.02)	0.05
Bad/very bad	639	58.6	452	41.4	1.04 (1.02-1.06)	<0.01
Self-perception of speech
Great/good	7,170	52.6	6,460	47.4	1
Normal	978	56.4	756	43.6	1.02 (1.00–1.04)	<0.01
Bad/very bad	318	59.4	217	40.6	1.04 (1.01–1.07)	<0.01
Self-perception of relationships
Not affected	6,177	52.0	5,694	48.0	1
Affected	1,804	58.1	1,300	41.9	1.04 (1.02–1.05)	<0.01

• PR (95% CI), prevalence ratio (95% confidence interval).

In the multivariate analysis, the need for orthodontic treatment was higher among females, non-whites, those that perceived a need for dental treatment, and those that perceived their appearance as normal, bad, or very bad. The need for orthodontic treatment was lower among those that lived in the Northeast and Central-West macro-regions compared to those of the Southeast macro-region, and also smaller among those that perceived their chewing to be normal or their oral health to be bad or very bad (Table 5).

Table 5.
Multivariate analysis of factors associated with the necessity for orthodontic treatment in 15-19 year old Brazilians, 2002-2003.

	PR (95%CI)	p value
Sex
Male	1
Female	1.01 (1.00-1.02)	0.01
Self-declared skin color
White	1
Non-white	1.01 (1.00-1.02)	0.01
Brazilian macro-region
Southeast	1
North	0.99 (0.97-1.00)	0.33
Northeast	0.98 (0.96-1.00)	0.05
South	1.01 (0.99-1.02)	0.21
Self-perception of need for treatment
No	1
Yes	1.02 (1.01-1.03)	<0.01
Self-perception of oral health status
Great/good	1
Normal	1.00 (0.99-1.01)	0.39
Bad/very bad	0.97 (0.95-0.99)	0.03
Self-perception of appearance
Great/good	1
Normal	1.06 (1.05-1.08)	<0.01
Bad/very bad	1.12 (1.10-1.14)	<0.01
Self-perception of chewing
Great/good	1
Normal	0.98 (0.96-0.99)	0.02
Bad/very bad	0.99 (0.97-1.01)	0.73

• PR (95% CI), prevalence ratio (95% confidence interval).

Discussion

This study identified a high prevalence of malocclusion (53.2%), and consequently, a high need for orthodontic treatment. It is widely accepted that adolescents are more vulnerable to socio-demographic and psychosocial factors, and that the lifestyle adopted by them may increase their susceptibility to disease during adolescence and at future points in their life course. Adolescents may be particularly vulnerable because they no longer benefit from the care and attention given to children, and they also do not benefit from the maturity of adulthood.¹⁶ The prevalence of malocclusion that requires treatment varies from country to country.

The prevalence among Brazilian adolescents was somewhat consistent with the prevalence of 53.15% in Mexican schoolchildren (12-18 years) in the city of Puebla,¹⁷ however, it is greater than the high need for orthodontic treatment reported in other countries, such as India (20-43%)^{18 , 19} and Nigeria (40.7%).²⁰ When compared with the rates identified in some Brazilian cities, the values observed in the present study were higher than those recorded in the city of Tubarão (SC, Southern Brazil) (45.6%)¹², and lower than the values identified in Belo Horizonte (MG, Southeast Brazil) (62,0%),¹¹ both studies using the DAI.

The need for orthodontic treatment was associated with adolescents' sex, skin color, Brazilian macro-region, self-perception of the need for treatment, oral health status, appearance and chewing. The findings of this project (Oral Health Brazil 2002-2003)¹⁵ were used for the launching of the Project Brazil Smiles in 2004. Public oral health centers for dental specialties (CEOs) were opened to the public offering at least oral diagnosis specialists (emphasizing oral cancer), minor oral surgery of hard and soft tissues, endodontics specialists, and treatment for patients with special needs. The offer of free orthodontic treatment in the CEOs began in 2011, following the Regular Meeting of the Tripartite Commission in Brasilia, capital of Brazil.²¹

The organization and access to health services can be stratified in three distinct and interrelated levels: primary care, secondary care, and tertiary (hospital-based) care. In the area of oral health, primary care comprises a set of targeted actions to identify, prevent and solve major problems of the affected population.¹ Secondary care covers more advanced treatments by oral health specialists in clinical and functional rehabilitation.²² Tertiary care in Brazil's public oral health care programs includes some high-cost procedures, performed primarily by private providers and public university hospitals, and paid for with public funds at prices close to market value.²³ Considering this organization of comprehensive care, orthodontic treatment is within the secondary service network.

Gender differences and cultural factors affect the prevalence of malocclusions. The prevalence of need for orthodontic treatment was higher among female Brazilian adolescents, perhaps due to the smaller jaw size in females that may lead to the lack of an adequate amount of space for the teeth,²⁴ or perhaps because women generally are more concerned with aesthetics,^{25 , 26} or because they are more prone to seeking preventive care.²⁷ Socioeconomic, cultural, and behavioral differences between racial groups and macro-regions may also account for some of the inequalities in the need for orthodontic treatment between these groups.²⁶

Similarly, a variety of sociocultural and psychological factors may influence self-perception of the need for orthodontic treatment. Adolescents who seek out orthodontic treatment may be concerned about improving their appearance and social acceptance, since people with malocclusion may feel shy, lose employment opportunities, and feel sorry for themselves, due to the compromised appearance of their teeth. Different types of malocclusions may produce changes not only in the aesthetic acceptability of appearance but in functionality and quality of life in terms of chewing, swallowing, breathing, smiling, and speaking, as well as experiences of pain and temporomandibular joint disorders.²⁷ In this study there was a greater prevalence of the need for treatment among those that perceived their oral health to be bad or very bad and among those who perceived their chewing as normal.

While the oral health strategies developed by SUS have led to positive outcomes for many Brazilians, inequalities based on socio-demographic factors persist.¹ Therefore, the public system has yet to fully meet its goals of providing equitable, universal, and inclusive care to meet the oral health care needs of all Brazilian citizens. To better attend to core principles of the public health system, such as universality, comprehensive care, and equity with regards to oral, and consequently overall health, access to orthodontic treatment within the public health care sector needs to be continually expanded in Brazil.

The estimates of the oral health conditions of the Brazilian population produced by this project have been discussed in the literature, but full data of the research were not published.^{28 , 29} The data used were generated over a decade ago; however, such associations had not been exploited yet by previous studies. Furthermore, given the methodological characteristics, cause-and-effect relationships between associations cannot be established. Despite these limitations, a high prevalence of need for orthodontic treatment among adolescents in Brazil was identified, associated with demographic and subjective issues that define oral health. The high prevalence of orthodontic needs in adolescents is a challenge to the goals of Brazil's universal public health system.

References

• ¹
  Paim J, Travassos C, Almeida C, Bahia L, Macinko J. The Brazilian health system: history, advances, and challenges. Lancet. 2011;377:1778-97.
• ²
  Travassos C. Equity in the Brazilian health care system: a contribution for debate. Cad Saude Publica. 1997;13:325-30.
• ³
  Mendes EV. Distrito sanitário: o processo social de mudança das práticas sanitárias do Sistema Único de Saúde. São Paulo: Hucitec/Abrasco; 1993.
• ⁴
  Wamala S, Merlo J, Boström G. Inequity in access to dental care services explains current socioeconomic disparities in oral health: The Swedish National Surveys of Public Health 2004-2005. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2006;60:1027-33.
• ⁵
  Peres MA, Peres KG, Barros AJ, Victora CG. The relation between family socioeconomic trajectories from childhood to adolescence and dental caries and associated oral behaviours. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2007;61:141-5.
• ⁶
  Abelsen B. What a difference a place makes: dental attendance and self-rated oral health among adults in three counties in Norway. Health Place. 2008;14:829-40.
• ⁷
  Ngom PI, Diagne F, Benoist HM, Thiam F. Intraarch and interarch relationships of the anterior teeth and periodontal conditions. Angle Orthod. 2006;76:236-42.
• ⁸
  Nelson S. Epidemiology for the practicing orthodontist. Semin Orthod. 1999;5:77-84.
• ⁹
  Peres KG, Traebert ES, Marcenes W. Differences between normative criteria and self-perception in the assessment of malocclusion. Rev Saude Publica. 2002;36:230-6.
• ¹⁰
  Jenny J, Cons NC. Establishing malocclusion severity levels on the Dental Aesthetic Index (DAI) scale. Aust Dent J. 1996;41:43-6.
• ¹¹
  Marques LS, Barbosa CC, Ramos-Jorge ML, Pordeus IA, Paiva SM. Malocclusion prevalence and orthodontic treatment need in 10-14-year-old schoolchildren in Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais State, Brazil: a psychosocial focus. Cad Saude Publica. 2005;21:1099-106.
• ¹²
  Claudino D, Traebert J. Malocclusion, dental aesthetic self-perception and quality of life in a 18 to 21 year-old population: a cross section study. BMC Oral Health. 2013;13:3.
• ¹³
  Brizon VS. Má oclusão em crianças e adolescentes brasileiros: modelo multinível. Belo Horizonte (MG): UFMG; 2012. Dissertação de mestrado.
• ¹⁴
  Brasil Ministério da Saúde. Projeto SB2000: condições de saúde bucal da população brasileira no ano 2000. Brasília: Ministério da Saúde; 2001.
• ¹⁵
  Brasil Ministério da Saúde. Condições de Saúde Bucal da população brasileira 2002-2003. Resultados Principais. Brasília: Ministério da Saúde; 2004.
• ¹⁶
  World Health Organization. Nutrition in adolescence Issues and challenges for the health sector: issues in adolescent health and development [Who Discussion Papers on Adolescence]. Geneva: WHO; 2005.
• ¹⁷
  Perez AV, Garcia RG, Cárdenas LA, Carrasco GR, Castro BC, Lezama FG, et al. Índice estética dental (DAI) y necessidad de tratamiento ortodóncico en escolares, Verano 2007. Oral. 2008;9:472-5.
• ¹⁸
  Dental Council of India. National oral health survey and fluoride mapping (India) 2002/2003. India: Dental Concil of India; 2004.
• ¹⁹
  Shivakumar KM, Chandu GN, Subba Reddy VV, Shafiulla MD. Prevalence of malocclusion and orthodontic treatment needs among middle and high school children of Davangere city, India, by using Dental Aesthetic Index. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2009;27:211-8.
• ²⁰
  Onyeaso CO, Aderinokun GA. The relationship between dental aesthetic index (DAI) and perceptions of aesthetics, function and speech amongst secondary school children in Ibadan, Nigeria. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2003;13:336-41.
• ²¹
  Brasil Ministério da Saúde. Secretaria de Atenção à Saúde Departamento de Atenção Básica. Saúde da família: passo a passo das ações do departamento de atenção básica. Brasília: Ministério da Saúde; 2011.
• ²²
  Pinho VG. Saúde bucal coletiva. São Paulo: Ed. Santos; 2000.
• ²³
  Solla J, Chioro O. Specialized outpatient care. In: Giovanella L, editor. Policies and health system in Brazil. Rio de Janeiro: Fiocruz; 2008. p. 627-73.
• ²⁴
  Al-Khateeb SN, Abu Alhaija ES. Tooth size discrepancies and arch parameters among different malocclusions in a Jordanian sample. Angle Orthod. 2006;76:459-65.
• ²⁵
  Paula Júnior DF, Santos NC, Silva ET, Nunes MF, Leles CR. Psychosocial impact of dental esthetics on quality of life in adolescents. Angle Orthod. 2009;79:1188-93.
• ²⁶
  Christopherson EA, Briskie D, Inglehart MR. Objective, subjective, and self-assessment of preadolescent orthodontic treatment need A function of age, gender, and ethnic/racial background? J Public Health Dent. 2009;69:9-17.
• ²⁷
  Shah ND, Arruda A, Inglehart MR. Pediatric patients' orthodontic treatment need, quality of life, and smiling patterns An analysis of patient, parent, and provider responses. J Public Health Dent. 2011;71:62-70.
• ²⁸
  Narvai PC, Antunes JL, Moysés SJ, Frazão P, Peres MA, Peres KG, et al. Scientific validity of epidemiological knowledge based on data from the Brazilian Oral Health Survey (SB Brazil 2003). Cad Saude Publica. 2010;26:647-70.
• ²⁹
  Martins AM, Jardim LA, Souza JG, Rodrigues CA, Ferreira RC, Pordeus IA. Is the negative evaluation of dental services among the Brazilian elderly population associated with the type of service? Rev Bras Epidemiol. 2014;17:71-90.

• Funding This study did not receive funding.

Publication Dates

• Publication in this collection
  Apr-Jun 2015

History

• Received
  04 May 2014
• Accepted
  08 Sept 2014