Acessibilidade / Reportar erro

Nursing diagnoses and interventions for the person with venous ulcer

Abstract

Objective

To develop and validate the terminological subset of ICNP® for the care of people with venous ulcer guided by Wanda Aguiar Horta’s theory of Basic Human Needs.

Methods

Methodological study for the development terminological subsets of ICNP®. Initially, was conducted an integrative review in order to search for evidence in the literature for the nursing practice to people with venous ulcer, and answer the following question: What are the empirical evidences found in the person with venous ulcer? The accessed databases were the Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online (MEDLINE), the Latin American and Caribbean Literature on Health Sciences Information (LILACS), and the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL). Inclusion criteria were the following: abstracts available in Portuguese, English or Spanish; and published between 2012 and 2016. Exclusion criteria were case reports, theses, monographs, manuals and papers that did not present clinical manifestations of venous ulcer.

Results

A group of nurse judges experienced in the treatment of venous ulcer validated 84 nursing diagnoses and outcomes, and 306 interventions. Of the diagnoses developed, 62 are included in ICNP® and 23 are new diagnoses, not included.

Conclusion

The ICNP® has proved to be a taxonomy that can be compatible and applicable to nurses’ clinic with potential for organization of the work process, whether in the outpatient or hospital setting.

Standardized nursing terminology; Nursing diagnosis; Nursing process; Varicose ulcer/classification

Resumo

Objetivo

Elaborar e validar o Subconjunto terminológico CIPE® para o cuidado à pessoa com úlcera venosa, orientado pela teoria das Necessidades Humanas Básicas de Wanda Aguiar Horta.

Métodos

Estudo metodológico para elaboração de subconjuntos terminológicos da CIPE®. Inicialmente, fez-se uma revisão integrativa, buscando evidências para a prática de enfermagem à pessoa com úlcera venosa dispostas na literatura, a fim de responder à seguinte pergunta: Quais as evidências empíricas apresentadas na pessoa com úlcera venosa? As bases acessadas foram o Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online (MEDLINE) e a Literatura Latino-Americana e do Caribe de Informação em Ciências da Saúde (LILACS), e também a Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL). Utilizaram-se os seguintes critérios de inclusão: ter resumo disponível nos idiomas português, inglês ou espanhol; e publicados entre 2012 e 2016. Como critérios de exclusão: relatos de casos, teses, monografias, manuais e trabalhos que não apresentavam manifestações clínicas da úlcera venosa.

Resultados

84 diagnósticos, resultados de enfermagem e 306 intervenções foram validados por um grupo de juízes enfermeiros, expertises em tratamento de úlcera venosa. Dos diagnósticos elaborados, 62 são constantes na CIPE® e 23 são novos diagnósticos, não constantes.

Conclusão

A CIPE® evidenciou-se como uma taxonomia que pode ser compatível e aplicável à clínica do enfermeiro, com potencial para a organização do processo de trabalho, seja no âmbito ambulatorial ou hospitalar.

Terminologia padronizada em Enfermagem; Diagnóstico de enfermagem; Processo de enfermagem; Classificação; Úlcera varicosa/classificação

Resumen

Objetivo

Elaborar y validar el Subconjunto terminológico CIPE® para el cuidado de la persona con úlcera venosa, orientado por la teoría de las Necesidades Humanas Básicas de Wanda Aguiar Horta.

Métodos

Estudio metodológico para elaboración de subconjuntos terminológicos de CIPE®. Inicialmente, se realizó revisión integrativa, buscando evidencias de la práctica de enfermería a la persona con úlcera venosa dispuestas en la literatura, para responder la pregunta: ¿Cuáles son las evidencias empíricas presentadas en la persona con úlcera venosa? Se buscó en las bases Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online (MEDLINE), Literatura Latinoamericana y del Caribe en Ciencias de la Salud (LILACS) y Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL). Se utilizaron los siguientes criterios de inclusión: contar con resumen disponible en portugués, inglés o español; y publicación entre 2012 y 2016. Como criterios de exclusión: relatos de casos, tesis, monografías, manuales y trabajos que no expresaban manifestaciones clínicas de la úlcera venosa.

Resultados

84 diagnósticos, resultados de enfermería y 306 intervenciones fueron validadas por un grupo de expertos enfermeros, especializados en tratamiento de úlcera venosa. De los diagnósticos elaborados, 62 constan en la CIPE® y 23 son nuevos.

Conclusión

La CIPE® se evidenció como taxonomía compatible y aplicable a la clínica del enfermero, con potencial para organización del proceso de trabajo, tanto en el ámbito ambulatorio como hospitalario.

Terminología normalizada de enfermería; Diagnóstico de enfermería; Proceso de enfermería; Clasifi cación; Úlcera varicosa/ clasifi cación

Introduction

Venous ulcers are a serious public health problem, since they cause disability, suffering, social isolation and are costly because they consume resources for care and cause damages to the quality of life.(11. Green J, Jester R, McKinley R, Pooler A. The impact of chronic venous leg ulcers: a systematic review. J Wound Care. 2014;23(12):601–12.,22. Torres G de V, Balduino LSC, Costa IKF, Mendes FRP, Vasconcelos QLD de AQ de. Comparação dos domínios da qualidade de vida de clientes com úlcera venosa. Rev Enferm UERJ. 2014; 22(1):57–64.) Furthermore, treatments are long and have recurrence of 70%.(33. Araújo RO, Silva DC, Souto RQ, Pergola-Marconato AM, Fernandes Costa IK, Torres GV. Impacto de úlceras venosas na qualidade de vida de indivíduos atendidos na atenção primária. Aquichan. 2016;16(1):56–66.) Prevalence in the world population is around 1% to 1.5%(44. O’Donnell TF, Passman MA, Marston WA, Ennis WJ, Dalsing M, Kistner RL, et al. Management of venous leg ulcers: Clinical practice guidelines of the Society for Vascular Surgery® and the American Venous Forum. J Vasc Surg. 2014;60(2):3S – 59S.,55. Oliveira SB, Pires PS, Soares DA. Prevalência de úlceras venosas e fatores associados entre adultos de um centro de saúde de Vitória da Conquista, BA. Rev Pesqui Cuid Fundam Online. 2015;7(3):2659–69.) and in Brazil, approximately 3% of the population is affected by venous ulcers.(66. Torres SM, Monteiro VG, Salvetti MD, Melo GD, Torres GD, Maia EM. Sociodemographic, clinic and health characterization of people with venous ulcers attended at the family health strategy. Rev Pesqui Cuid Fundam Online. 2014;6(5):50.)

The professional’s conduct is fundamental for the evolution or not of the wound, and the care choices can contribute to the improvement or worsening of the clinical picture.(77. Oliveira BG, Castro JB, Ganjeiro JM. Panorama epidemiológico e clínico de pacientes com feridas crônicas tratados em ambulatório. Rev Enferm UERJ. 2013; 21(1): 612–7.) From its conception, Nursing has the care of people with wounds in its routine practice. In the search for qualifying the care provided, the nursing process should be used as a methodological and systematic tool for providing care to people with venous ulcer.(88. Conselho Federal de Enfermagem. Resolução COFEN no 358/2009, de 15 de outubro de 2009 [Internet]. COFEN; 2009.[citado 2018 Maio 22]. Disponível em: htt://site.portalcofen.gov.br/node/4384
htt://site.portalcofen.gov.br/node/4384...
)

For implementation of the nursing process, should be used classification systems that help in the identification of nursing diagnoses, outcomes and interventions. Among taxonomies, the International Classification for Nursing Practice (ICNP®) is appropriate especially when directed at a specific population or health priority, and represented by terminological subsets.(99. Araújo AA, Nóbrega MM, Garcia TR. Diagnósticos e intervenções de enfermagem para pacientes portadores de insuficiência cardíaca congestiva utilizando a CIPE®. Rev Esc Enferm USP. 2013;47(2):385-92.)

Terminological subsets are sets of nursing diagnostic statements, outcomes and interventions directed to specific health conditions, specialties or care contexts, or nursing phenomena with the aim to facilitate the documentation of practice and simplify the use of the ICNP® classification.(1010. International Council of Nurses (ICN). Guidelines for ICNP® Catalogue Development: International Classification for Nursing Practice Program. Geneva: ICN; 2008.) There is a growing need for the development of terminological subsets, and seven subsets have been published so far, although none is targeted to people with venous ulcers yet.

The approach to venous ulcer patients needs to be holistic and integral, since the etiology is complex and has several associated factors that directly interfere in the quality of life of these people.(33. Araújo RO, Silva DC, Souto RQ, Pergola-Marconato AM, Fernandes Costa IK, Torres GV. Impacto de úlceras venosas na qualidade de vida de indivíduos atendidos na atenção primária. Aquichan. 2016;16(1):56–66.,66. Torres SM, Monteiro VG, Salvetti MD, Melo GD, Torres GD, Maia EM. Sociodemographic, clinic and health characterization of people with venous ulcers attended at the family health strategy. Rev Pesqui Cuid Fundam Online. 2014;6(5):50.) In this perspective, Wanda Aguiar Horta’s Theory of Basic Human Needs is an adequate theoretical contribution in the organization of nursing care to people with venous ulcers, because according to this theory, nursing respects and maintains uniqueness, authenticity and individuality of human beings.(1111. Horta WA. Processo de enfermagem. Rio de Janeiro: Guanabara Koogan; 2011.)

Hence the relevance of the present study with the aim to develop and validate the terminological subset of the ICNP® for the care of the person with venous ulcer guided by Wanda Aguiar Horta’s Theory of Basic Human Needs.

Methods

A methodological study based on the method of Nobrega et al(1212. Carvalho CM, Cubas MR, Nóbrega MM. Método brasileiro para desenvolvimento de subconjuntos terminológicos da CIPE®: limites e potencialidades. Rev Bras Enferm. 2017;70(2):449–54.) for the development terminological subsets of ICNP®. Initially, was conducted an integrative review in the literature searching for evidence for the practice of nursing for people with venous ulcer in order to answer the following question: What are the empirical evidences found in people with venous ulcer?

The databases accessed were the Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online (MEDLINE), the Latin American and Caribbean Literature on Health Sciences Information (LILACS), and the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL).

The search was performed in the portal of the Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Level Personnel using the Health Science Descriptors (DeCS), and by crossing two by two with the Boolean operator AND, as follows: “Úlcera Varicosa”, “Enfermagem” in Portuguese; “Varicose Ulcer”, “Nursing” in English; and “Úlcera Varicosa”, “Enfermería” in Spanish. For the search in CINAHL, were used the following Medical Subject Headings (MESH) terms: “Varicose Ulcer”, “Nursing”. The inclusion criteria were abstracts available in Portuguese, English or Spanish and publication period between 2012 and 2016. Exclusion criteria were all case reports, theses, monographs, manuals and papers that did not have clinical manifestations of venous ulcer.

The searches and analyzes of titles and abstracts were performed by two researchers. After selection, the articles were read by two researchers, which allowed the manual extraction of empirical evidence. Then, three researchers performed a process of analysis, grouping and standardization of the initial list that resulted in 88 evidences.

In the next stage of the study, began the construction of diagnostic statements and nursing outcomes by cross-checking the empirical evidence with terms of the ICNP®, version 2015. For each empirical evidence, was selected a term of the Focus axis and a term of the Judgment axis with inclusion of additional terms when necessary, which resulted in 73 diagnoses and outcomes. Twenty-three new diagnoses and nursing outcomes were created, as they were not included in ICNP®, version 2015. The ISO 18.104: 2014 norm was also considered - Health informatics: categorical structures for representation of nursing diagnoses and nursing actions in terminological systems, in which a diagnosis can be expressed by focus and judgment or a clinical finding.(1313. International Oranization for Standardization (ISO). Health Informatics: Categorial tructures for representation of nursing diagnoses and nursing actions in terminological systems (ISO/FDIS 18104: 2014). Geneva: ISO; 2014. [cited 2018 May 28]. Available from: <http://www.iso.org/iso/iso_catalogue/catalogue_tc/catalogue_detail.htm?csnumber=59431. Acesso em novembro de 2015.
http://www.iso.org/iso/iso_catalogue/cat...
) In this same stage, were constructed operational definitions for each diagnosis by using the definitions of ICNP® for the constant terms, and of scientific articles, manuals, Nursing textbooks and dictionaries for non-constant terms. The established definition used for this construction is formed by the ‘term representing the object’ + verb to be + ‘definite or indefinite article’ + ‘class to which the object belongs’ + ‘characteristics of species’.(1414. Garcia TR. Classificação Internacional para a Prática de Enfermagem (CIPE®): versão 2015. Porto Alegre: Artmed; 2016. 340 p.)

For each diagnosis, was developed a block of statements of Nursing interventions by using a term of the Action axis and an ICNP® Target term, which may belong to any of the axes, except the Judgment axis. The ISO 18.104: 2014 was also considered with a descriptor for action and at least one descriptor for target, except when the target is the own subject of the record.(1313. International Oranization for Standardization (ISO). Health Informatics: Categorial tructures for representation of nursing diagnoses and nursing actions in terminological systems (ISO/FDIS 18104: 2014). Geneva: ISO; 2014. [cited 2018 May 28]. Available from: <http://www.iso.org/iso/iso_catalogue/catalogue_tc/catalogue_detail.htm?csnumber=59431. Acesso em novembro de 2015.
http://www.iso.org/iso/iso_catalogue/cat...
) In addition to cross-mapping with the ICNP®, version 2015, were used reference books in the area of venous ulcer(44. O’Donnell TF, Passman MA, Marston WA, Ennis WJ, Dalsing M, Kistner RL, et al. Management of venous leg ulcers: Clinical practice guidelines of the Society for Vascular Surgery® and the American Venous Forum. J Vasc Surg. 2014;60(2):3S – 59S.) and Nursing,(1515. Cubas MR, Nóbrega MM. Atenção Primária em Saúde: Diagnósticos, resultados e intervenções de enfermagem. Rio de Janeiro: Elsevier; 2015.,1616. Garcia TR, Cubas MR. Diagnósticos, intervenções e resultados de Enfermagem: subsídios para a sistematização da prática profissional. Rio de Janeiro: Elsevier; 2012.) besides the researchers’ experience.

The terminological subset was subjected to content validation by consensus with nurse judges, and criteria were to work in a Basic Health Unit of the Municipality of Vitória (state of Espírito Santo) and attend people with venous ulcer. Nurse judges were chosen by convenience, indication of researchers and the stomatherapist nurse, who is reference in wounds and coordinator of the skin care group at the City Hall. For this stage, were invited 13 nurses by letter, in addition to the coordinator of the skin care group.

At the beginning of the meeting, was given orientation regarding the study, the Basic Human Needs Theory and ICNP®. Subsequently, nurses were given the subset, a questionnaire to characterize the judges, and the operational definitions of diagnoses. Nurses were asked to read the material and indicate agreements/disagreements with the subset. After that, were discussed only the items in which there was disagreement, and it was decided by consensus about the permanence, withdrawal or rewriting of the statement. Statements were considered valid when there was 100% consensus.

The validation meeting lasted three and a half hours. After that time, the proposed changes were written by the researcher, and shared with participants by email. Then, they had seven days to read and make comments about the writing.

In the absence of disagreement, the subset was restructured according to recommendations of the International Council of Nurses and guided by the theoretical framework of Basic Human Needs.

The study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo under number CAAE 61423516.7.0000.5060.

Results

In the integrative literature review, were found 43 articles in LILACS, 56 in MEDLINE and one in CINAHL, the total of 100 articles. Of these, six were excluded because the abstracts were not available, and seven were excluded because they were repeated. After reading the 87 abstracts, 66 articles were excluded following the exclusion criteria. Finally, 21 articles were selected for reading in full (Figure 1).

Figure 1
PRISMA flowchart of the search and selection process of studies included in the integrative review

Of these articles, 88 evidences were manually extracted. Besides the ‘venous ulcer’ term that was present in all articles, the most cited was ‘pain’, in 71.4% of publications, followed by terms related to venous insufficiency with 66.6%. The reduction of functional mobility was present in 61.9% of articles, and ‘exudate’, ‘infection’ and ‘social isolation’ were in 52.3% each; ‘odor’ in 42.8%; ‘healing’, ‘hyperglycemia’ and ‘edema’ in 38.9%. ‘Decreased rest’ and ‘decreased ability to work’ were in 33.3% of publications, ‘necrosis’, ‘relapse’, ‘changes in sleep pattern’ and ‘low self-esteem’ were cited in 28.5%. Other terms had five or fewer citations and, despite this fact, they were considered for the creation of diagnoses.

By means of cross-referencing the evidences extracted with terms included in the Focus axis of ICNP®, version 2015, were developed 73 nursing diagnoses and outcomes. In addition, were created 23 new diagnoses and nursing outcomes, as these evidences were not found in ICNP®, version 2015. There were 96 nursing diagnoses and outcomes in total, and operational definitions for each diagnosis were also provided.

For an easier clinical reasoning, diagnoses were organized within the fields of Basic Human Needs described by Wanda Aguiar Horta. For each nursing diagnosis, was developed a block of statements of nursing interventions (total of 306) by considering the 7 Axes Model of the ICNP®, version 2015.

The statements underwent content validation by consensus of 13 nurses, and 84 diagnoses and nursing outcomes were considered valid by 100% of judges. Of the 23 diagnoses not included in ICNP®, 16 remained unchanged, three were excluded, and four were changed in the writing of the statement. There were suggestions for changes and adjustments in some interventions. Thus, the final configuration of the subset is described in chart 1.

Chart 1
ICNP® terminological subset for care of the person with venous ulcer

The distribution of nursing diagnoses and interventions by basic human needs is shown in chart 2.

Chart 2
Distribution of diagnoses and interventions by basic human needs

Discussion

Since the care of people with venous ulcer is complex, nurses must rely on a holistic perspective for a full approach to individuals, especially when considering they are particularly weakened and biopsychosocially impacted.(1717. Ferreira AM, Bogamil DD, Tormena PC. O enfermeiro e o tratamento de feridas: em busca da autonomiado cuidado. Arq Ciênc Saúde. 2008;15(3):103–5.) This fact corroborates the pertinence of chosing the Basic Human Needs Theory by demonstrating its applicability to meet the needs of this population and contributes to the organization of diagnoses in an integral and comprehensive way.

Most diagnoses were included in psychobiological needs with focus on skin and mucosal integrity. After all, venous ulcer is commonly characterized by its location in the lower part of the leg, of superficial depth or partial thickness, reaching only the epidermis and dermis, with granulation tissue in its bed, irregular edges, and medium to large amount of exudate of serous or serous bloody aspect.(66. Torres SM, Monteiro VG, Salvetti MD, Melo GD, Torres GD, Maia EM. Sociodemographic, clinic and health characterization of people with venous ulcers attended at the family health strategy. Rev Pesqui Cuid Fundam Online. 2014;6(5):50.,1818. Budó ML, Durgante VL, Rizzatti SJ, Silva DC, Gewehr M, Farão EM. Úlcera venosa, índice tornozelo braço e dor nas pessoas com úlcera venosa em assistência no ambulatório de angiologia. Rev Enferm Centro-Oeste Min. 2015;5(3):1794–804.,1919. Oliveira BG, Nogueira GA, Carvalho MR, Abreu AM. Caracterização dos pacientes com úlcera venosa acompanhados no ambulatório de reparo de feridas. Rev Eletrônica Enferm. 2012;14(1):156–63.) The estimated recurrence rate for improved venous ulcers is about 70%.(33. Araújo RO, Silva DC, Souto RQ, Pergola-Marconato AM, Fernandes Costa IK, Torres GV. Impacto de úlceras venosas na qualidade de vida de indivíduos atendidos na atenção primária. Aquichan. 2016;16(1):56–66.,2020. Sant’Ana SM, Nunes CA, Santos QR, Bachion MM, Malaquias SG, Oliveira BGRB. Úlceras venosas: caracterização clínica e tratamento em usuários atendidos em rede ambulatorial. Rev Bras Enferm. 2012;65(4):637–44.)

The main etiology of venous ulcer is Chronic Venous Insufficiency (CVI), which is the most prevalent of venous diseases and affects 2% of the western population.(2121. Weller C, Evans S. Venous leg ulcer management in general practice--practice nurses and evidence based guidelines. Aust Fam Physician. 2012;41(5):331–7.) Thus, in the psychobiological need for regulation, the venous stasis caused by CVI results in skin and microcirculation changes that cause edema, lipodermatosclerosis, varicose veins, hyperpigmentation, eczema, dermatitis and cellulitis or erysipelas, which will culminate in ulceration.(44. O’Donnell TF, Passman MA, Marston WA, Ennis WJ, Dalsing M, Kistner RL, et al. Management of venous leg ulcers: Clinical practice guidelines of the Society for Vascular Surgery® and the American Venous Forum. J Vasc Surg. 2014;60(2):3S – 59S.,55. Oliveira SB, Pires PS, Soares DA. Prevalência de úlceras venosas e fatores associados entre adultos de um centro de saúde de Vitória da Conquista, BA. Rev Pesqui Cuid Fundam Online. 2015;7(3):2659–69.)

In the psychobiological need for perception, pain is a frequent symptom in people with venous ulcer, and prevalence of around 80% in this population.(1818. Budó ML, Durgante VL, Rizzatti SJ, Silva DC, Gewehr M, Farão EM. Úlcera venosa, índice tornozelo braço e dor nas pessoas com úlcera venosa em assistência no ambulatório de angiologia. Rev Enferm Centro-Oeste Min. 2015;5(3):1794–804.,2222. Silva DC, Torres GV, Budó ML, Schimith MD, Salvetti MG. Personal pain relief strategies used by venous ulcer patients. Rev Dor. 2015;16(2):86–9.,2323. Salvetti MG, Costa IK, Dantas DV, Freitas CC, Vasconcelos QL, Torres GV. Prevalência de dor e fatores associados em pacientes com úlcera venosa. Rev Dor. 2014;15(1):17–20.) Its chronic condition bears a close relation to decreased functional and working capacity, sleep pattern disturbances, increased wound healing time and even social isolation, which significantly reduce the quality of life of these people.(33. Araújo RO, Silva DC, Souto RQ, Pergola-Marconato AM, Fernandes Costa IK, Torres GV. Impacto de úlceras venosas na qualidade de vida de indivíduos atendidos na atenção primária. Aquichan. 2016;16(1):56–66.,1818. Budó ML, Durgante VL, Rizzatti SJ, Silva DC, Gewehr M, Farão EM. Úlcera venosa, índice tornozelo braço e dor nas pessoas com úlcera venosa em assistência no ambulatório de angiologia. Rev Enferm Centro-Oeste Min. 2015;5(3):1794–804.,2222. Silva DC, Torres GV, Budó ML, Schimith MD, Salvetti MG. Personal pain relief strategies used by venous ulcer patients. Rev Dor. 2015;16(2):86–9.)

Regarding psychosocial needs, the presence of ulcers affects the body self-image, self-esteem, social and family life, the ability for work and daily activities, and causes important damages to those affected.(11. Green J, Jester R, McKinley R, Pooler A. The impact of chronic venous leg ulcers: a systematic review. J Wound Care. 2014;23(12):601–12.,2424. Dias TY, Costa IK, Melo MD, Torres SM, Maia EM, Torres GV. Avaliação da qualidade de vida de pacientes com e sem úlcera venosa. Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2014;22(4):576–81.)

Most of the evidence refers to psychobiological needs with a focus on the injury. Thus, it will be the nurses’s role in the exercise of care to turn this thread of their practice (this subset) from a hard technology into a light technology by using criticality and mediation through dialogue with patients, and by considering people as subjects of learning for their self-care, understanding them as historical and autonomous subjects.

The validation of the nursing diagnoses allows the perfection and legitimization of the taxonomy, and enables the generalization and increase of its prediction.(2525. Lopes MV, Silva VM, Araujo TL. Validação de diagnósticos de enfermagem: desafios e alternativas. Rev Bras Enferm. 2013;66(5):650-5.) A methodological proposal for validation of the subsets has not been defined by the ICN.(1212. Carvalho CM, Cubas MR, Nóbrega MM. Método brasileiro para desenvolvimento de subconjuntos terminológicos da CIPE®: limites e potencialidades. Rev Bras Enferm. 2017;70(2):449–54.)

The validation by consensus allows an exhaustive discussion in a potential group, the deepening of knowledge about it and greater use of the classification.(2626. Azzolin K, Souza EN, Ruschel KB, Mussi CM, Lucena AF, Rabelo ER. Consensus on nursing diagnoses, interventions and outcomes for home care of patients with heart failure. Rev Gaúcha Enferm. 2012;33(4):56–63.) All nurses participated in the discussions about the permanence or withdrawal of some diagnoses and interventions, such as changing the writing of items of the subset in order to fit the professional practice.

The ICNP® subset for people with venous ulcer that was validated in the present study can qualify nursing care for these people. Since this is a documentation instrument, it supports and improves clinical practice, and facilitates the incorporation of the ICNP® in nurses’ practice. However, it is noteworthy that catalogs do not replace nurses’ clinical judgment in decision making for individualized care.(1212. Carvalho CM, Cubas MR, Nóbrega MM. Método brasileiro para desenvolvimento de subconjuntos terminológicos da CIPE®: limites e potencialidades. Rev Bras Enferm. 2017;70(2):449–54.)

Despite the evident importance of the subset, some points must be considered: the validation process occurred in a small group of specific population, which may limit its applicability in other scenarios. Nonetheless, the scientific basis for its construction emerged from studies and national and international clinical guidelines published in indexed journals. Submitting this subset to clinical validation, as well as external validation that considers several cultural scenarios and extracts can improve its sensitivity and specificity.

Conclusion

The study allowed the development and validation of a terminological subset with 84 nursing diagnoses and outcomes, and 306 interventions for care of the person with venous ulcer from the ICNP®, and structured on the Basic Human Needs Theory. Besides supporting the organization of the subset, this theory provided theoretical-conceptual contribution to the study. The ICNP® proved to be a taxonomy compatible with nurses’ clinical practice given its usual vocabulary in professional practice. This terminology has perceptible potential for the organization of nurses’ work process both in the outpatient and hospital setting. The proposed instrument is expected to be the subject of further studies for its inclusion in the professional practice of nurses caring for people with venous ulcer in order to be a mechanism for improvement of the care provided.

Referências

  • 1
    Green J, Jester R, McKinley R, Pooler A. The impact of chronic venous leg ulcers: a systematic review. J Wound Care. 2014;23(12):601–12.
  • 2
    Torres G de V, Balduino LSC, Costa IKF, Mendes FRP, Vasconcelos QLD de AQ de. Comparação dos domínios da qualidade de vida de clientes com úlcera venosa. Rev Enferm UERJ. 2014; 22(1):57–64.
  • 3
    Araújo RO, Silva DC, Souto RQ, Pergola-Marconato AM, Fernandes Costa IK, Torres GV. Impacto de úlceras venosas na qualidade de vida de indivíduos atendidos na atenção primária. Aquichan. 2016;16(1):56–66.
  • 4
    O’Donnell TF, Passman MA, Marston WA, Ennis WJ, Dalsing M, Kistner RL, et al. Management of venous leg ulcers: Clinical practice guidelines of the Society for Vascular Surgery® and the American Venous Forum. J Vasc Surg. 2014;60(2):3S – 59S.
  • 5
    Oliveira SB, Pires PS, Soares DA. Prevalência de úlceras venosas e fatores associados entre adultos de um centro de saúde de Vitória da Conquista, BA. Rev Pesqui Cuid Fundam Online. 2015;7(3):2659–69.
  • 6
    Torres SM, Monteiro VG, Salvetti MD, Melo GD, Torres GD, Maia EM. Sociodemographic, clinic and health characterization of people with venous ulcers attended at the family health strategy. Rev Pesqui Cuid Fundam Online. 2014;6(5):50.
  • 7
    Oliveira BG, Castro JB, Ganjeiro JM. Panorama epidemiológico e clínico de pacientes com feridas crônicas tratados em ambulatório. Rev Enferm UERJ. 2013; 21(1): 612–7.
  • 8
    Conselho Federal de Enfermagem. Resolução COFEN no 358/2009, de 15 de outubro de 2009 [Internet]. COFEN; 2009.[citado 2018 Maio 22]. Disponível em: htt://site.portalcofen.gov.br/node/4384
    » htt://site.portalcofen.gov.br/node/4384
  • 9
    Araújo AA, Nóbrega MM, Garcia TR. Diagnósticos e intervenções de enfermagem para pacientes portadores de insuficiência cardíaca congestiva utilizando a CIPE®. Rev Esc Enferm USP. 2013;47(2):385-92.
  • 10
    International Council of Nurses (ICN). Guidelines for ICNP® Catalogue Development: International Classification for Nursing Practice Program. Geneva: ICN; 2008.
  • 11
    Horta WA. Processo de enfermagem. Rio de Janeiro: Guanabara Koogan; 2011.
  • 12
    Carvalho CM, Cubas MR, Nóbrega MM. Método brasileiro para desenvolvimento de subconjuntos terminológicos da CIPE®: limites e potencialidades. Rev Bras Enferm. 2017;70(2):449–54.
  • 13
    International Oranization for Standardization (ISO). Health Informatics: Categorial tructures for representation of nursing diagnoses and nursing actions in terminological systems (ISO/FDIS 18104: 2014). Geneva: ISO; 2014. [cited 2018 May 28]. Available from: <http://www.iso.org/iso/iso_catalogue/catalogue_tc/catalogue_detail.htm?csnumber=59431 Acesso em novembro de 2015.
    » http://www.iso.org/iso/iso_catalogue/catalogue_tc/catalogue_detail.htm?csnumber=59431
  • 14
    Garcia TR. Classificação Internacional para a Prática de Enfermagem (CIPE®): versão 2015. Porto Alegre: Artmed; 2016. 340 p.
  • 15
    Cubas MR, Nóbrega MM. Atenção Primária em Saúde: Diagnósticos, resultados e intervenções de enfermagem. Rio de Janeiro: Elsevier; 2015.
  • 16
    Garcia TR, Cubas MR. Diagnósticos, intervenções e resultados de Enfermagem: subsídios para a sistematização da prática profissional. Rio de Janeiro: Elsevier; 2012.
  • 17
    Ferreira AM, Bogamil DD, Tormena PC. O enfermeiro e o tratamento de feridas: em busca da autonomiado cuidado. Arq Ciênc Saúde. 2008;15(3):103–5.
  • 18
    Budó ML, Durgante VL, Rizzatti SJ, Silva DC, Gewehr M, Farão EM. Úlcera venosa, índice tornozelo braço e dor nas pessoas com úlcera venosa em assistência no ambulatório de angiologia. Rev Enferm Centro-Oeste Min. 2015;5(3):1794–804.
  • 19
    Oliveira BG, Nogueira GA, Carvalho MR, Abreu AM. Caracterização dos pacientes com úlcera venosa acompanhados no ambulatório de reparo de feridas. Rev Eletrônica Enferm. 2012;14(1):156–63.
  • 20
    Sant’Ana SM, Nunes CA, Santos QR, Bachion MM, Malaquias SG, Oliveira BGRB. Úlceras venosas: caracterização clínica e tratamento em usuários atendidos em rede ambulatorial. Rev Bras Enferm. 2012;65(4):637–44.
  • 21
    Weller C, Evans S. Venous leg ulcer management in general practice--practice nurses and evidence based guidelines. Aust Fam Physician. 2012;41(5):331–7.
  • 22
    Silva DC, Torres GV, Budó ML, Schimith MD, Salvetti MG. Personal pain relief strategies used by venous ulcer patients. Rev Dor. 2015;16(2):86–9.
  • 23
    Salvetti MG, Costa IK, Dantas DV, Freitas CC, Vasconcelos QL, Torres GV. Prevalência de dor e fatores associados em pacientes com úlcera venosa. Rev Dor. 2014;15(1):17–20.
  • 24
    Dias TY, Costa IK, Melo MD, Torres SM, Maia EM, Torres GV. Avaliação da qualidade de vida de pacientes com e sem úlcera venosa. Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2014;22(4):576–81.
  • 25
    Lopes MV, Silva VM, Araujo TL. Validação de diagnósticos de enfermagem: desafios e alternativas. Rev Bras Enferm. 2013;66(5):650-5.
  • 26
    Azzolin K, Souza EN, Ruschel KB, Mussi CM, Lucena AF, Rabelo ER. Consensus on nursing diagnoses, interventions and outcomes for home care of patients with heart failure. Rev Gaúcha Enferm. 2012;33(4):56–63.

Publication Dates

  • Publication in this collection
    May-Jun 2018

History

  • Received
    29 Apr 2018
  • Accepted
    28 May 2018
Escola Paulista de Enfermagem, Universidade Federal de São Paulo R. Napoleão de Barros, 754, 04024-002 São Paulo - SP/Brasil, Tel./Fax: (55 11) 5576 4430 - São Paulo - SP - Brazil
E-mail: actapaulista@unifesp.br