SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.13 issue5Antimicrobial Ellagitannin of Punica granatum FruitsInvestigations on the Formation of Copper Polyvanadates as a Function of pH author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

Share


Journal of the Brazilian Chemical Society

Print version ISSN 0103-5053On-line version ISSN 1678-4790

J. Braz. Chem. Soc. vol.13 no.5 São Paulo Sept.Oct. 2002

http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0103-50532002000500011 

Article

 

Antimony (V) Oxide Adsorbed on a Silica-Zirconia Mixed Oxide Obtained by the Sol-Gel Processing Method: Preparation and Acid Properties

 

Galina Zaitsevab and Yoshitaka Gushikem*,a

a Instituto de Química, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, CP 6154, 13083-970 Campinas - SP, Brazil

b Institute of Sorption and Endoecology Problems, Kiev, 252680 Ukraine

 

 

A preparação, o grau de dispersão, estabilidade térmica e a acidez de Lewis e de Brønsted do óxido de antimônio (V) adsorvido sobre SiO2/ZrO2, preparado previamente pelo processo sol-gel, são descritas neste trabalho. Amostras de SiO2/ZrO2/Sb2O5 de composições (% em massa): (a) Zr= 8,1 e Sb= 6,3; (b) Zr= 11,4 e Sb= 11,4, foram preparadas. As imagens de microscopia eletrônica de varredura conectada a um espectrômetro de energia dispersiva de raios X mostraram que os metais, Zr e Sb, estão homogeneamente dispersos em ambas as matrizes. Os padrões de difração de raios X de SiO2/ZrO2/Sb2O5 aquecido a diversas temperaturas mostraram que até 1023 K a amostra apresentou-se amorfa. Em 1273 K a formação da fase cristalina ZrO2 (baddeleita) foi observada e elevando-se a temperatura a 1573 K, as fases cristalinas de SiO2 (cristobalita) e possivelmente de ZrO2/Sb2O5 foram observadas. Utilizando a piridina como sonda molecular, sítios ácidos de Brønsted do sólido SiO2/ZrO2/Sb2O5, aquecido até 523 K, mostraram ser bastante estáveis.

 

The preparation, degree of dispersion, thermal stability and Lewis and Brønsted acidity of antimony (V) oxide adsorbed on SiO2/ZrO2 mixed oxide, previously prepared by the sol-gel processing method, are described herein. The samples SiO2/ZrO2/Sb2O5, with compositions (in wt %): (a) Zr= 8.1 and Sb= 6.3; (b) Zr= 14.9 and Sb= 11.4, were prepared. Scanning electron microscopy images connected to a X-ray energy dispersive spectrometer showed that both metals, Zr and Sb, were highly dispersed in the matrices. The X-ray diffraction patterns of SiO2/ZrO2/Sb2O5 heated at different temperatures showed that, up to 1023 K, the matrix was amorphous. At 1273 K a crystalline phase of ZrO2 (baddeleyite) was observed and raising the temperature to 1573 K, crystalline phases of SiO2 (cristobalite) and presumably of ZrO2/Sb2O5 were observed. Using pyridine as a molecular probe, Brønsted acid sites on the SiO2/ZrO2/Sb2O5 matrix, heat treated up to 523 K, were shown to be very stable.

Keywords: sol-gel method, silica-zirconia-antimony mixed oxide, Brønsted and Lewis acid sites

 

 

Introduction

Antimony oxide, Sb2O5, as amorphous or crystalline phases, is normally obtained as a fine powder presenting low mechanical and thermal resistance.1,2 limiting its use when a rigid and porous matrix is required. Since the oxide presents good acid properties and to overcome this problem, Sb2O5 has been obtained in a highly dispersed form by the grafting reaction of SbCl5 on a SiO2 surface from a non aqueous solvent.3 The material obtained SiO2/Sb2O5, combined the acid properties of the antimony oxide with the mechanical and thermal resistance of the SiO2 matrix. The oxide is attached to the surface by Si-O-Sb bond formation.3 However, the use of the material has been limited to neutral aqueous solutions because antimony oxide is leached off the surface, due to the easy hydrolysis of the Si-O-Sb bond in acid solution.

An alternative way to obtain chemically stable Sb2O5 is to adsorb Sb(V) on a binary mixed oxide matrix obtained by the sol-gel processing method.4 This procedure has been used in order to obtain Sb2O5 dispersed on a SiO2/TiO2 matrix, rendering the antimony oxide practically insoluble in an acid solution due to the formation of the new titanium (IV) antimonate phase.

The use of the mixed oxide prepared by the sol-gel method is very important because it permits to obtain a material where the components are highly and homogeneously dispersed in the matrix.5-13 This work describes the procedure to adsorb antimony (V) oxide on SiO2/ZrO2, previously obtained by the sol-gel processing method, aiming to obtain a homogeneous and poorly soluble zirconium oxide-antimoium oxide phase immobilized on the SiO2 surface. The physical properties of the material, obtained by X-ray diffraction (XRD), X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) connected to a X-ray emission analyzer are described. The thermal stability of the Brønsted solid acid, by using pyridine as the molecular probe, is also described.

 

Experimental

Preparation of SiO2/ZrO2 by the sol gel method

The silica-zirconia mixed oxides, containing two different compositions of the metal oxide, were prepared by the sol gel method as described elsewhere, with some modifications.14 In a reaction flask containing 250 mL of tetraethylorthosilicate (TEOS, Aldrich; 1.1 mol), 14 mL of aqueous HCl 3 mol L-1 solution were carefully added and the resulting solution was stirred for 3 h at 333 K. A solution containing 28 mL of zirconium tetrabutoxide (ZrBu4, Aldrich; 0.061 mol) in 80 mL of dry ethanol was slowly added under an argon atmosphere and the mixture was stirred for 1.5 h. In a second preparation, a mixture containing 69 mL of ZrBu4 (0.15 mol) and 80 mL of dry ethanol was used. About 7 mL of 3 mol L-1 HCl solution was added dropwise in the first preparation and 17.5 mL of 3 mol L-1 HCl solution in the second one. The resulting mixtures were allowed to rest for 16 h. The solvents were evaporated by gently heating the mixture at 353 K. The xerogel formed in each preparation was ground and sieved between 200-250 mesh, washed with ethanol in a soxhlet apparatus and then immersed in 0.1 mol L-1 HCl solution for 24 h, filtered and dried under vacuum at 333 K.

Reaction of SiO2/ZrO2 with Sb(V)

About 20 g of SiO2/ZrO2 xerogel was immersed in 50 mL of an acid solution (2.5 mol L-1 HCl) of 0.45 mol L-1 Sb(V). The volume was completed to 800 mL with pure water and the mixture was stirred at 333 K for 7h. The solid was filtered, washed with water until the filtrate solution was neutral, and dried at 333 K in an oven.

Chemical analyses

Samples of about 0.1 g of SiO2/ZrO2 or SiO2/ZrO2/Sb2O5 were treated with a few drops of 40% HF solution (v/v) until complete dissolution of the solid. HF was eliminated from the solution with a HNO3:HCl mixture (1:15 v/v) and the Sb and Zr contents were analyzed using atomic absorption spectroscopy on a Perkin Elmer Optima 3000 DV apparatus.

Physical measurements

The scanning electron micrograph images were obtained from a JEOL JSM T-300 microscope by dispersing the sample on a conducting double-faced tape adhered to an aluminum support. The adhered samples were coated with a thin film of graphite by using the low voltage sputtering technique on a Plasma Science Model LVC 76 apparatus. The X-ray emission analysis was made using a Tracor Northern EDS microprobe.

UV-Visible diffuse reflectance spectra (DRS)

UV-Vis DRS spectra of the samples were obtained by using a UV-VIS-NIR Cary 5G spectrophotometer. The measurements were carried out using BaSO4 as the blank reference.

X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) spectra of the samples were obtained by using an aluminum anode (AlKα=1486.6 eV) at a pressure of 2.66´10-5 Pa on a McPherson ESCA-36 spectrometer. The atomic ratios were estimated by integrating the areas under the peaks using the corresponding Scofileld cross section15 for each atomic level involved. The binding energies were calibrated against C1s at 284.6 eV.

X-ray diffraction patterns were obtained using CuKα radiation (λ = 0.154 nm) at 30 kV, current of 20 mA and a scan rate of 0.0330 s-1 (degree in 2θ) on a Shimadzu 600 diffractometer.

Specific surface area (SBET) was determined by the BET method by using an ASAP 2010 apparatus from Micromeritics.

The nature of surface acid sites was determined by using pyridine as a molecular probe. Self-supported pressed disks of the sample were previously degassed at 353 K under vacuum and impregnated with pyridine molecules. The transmission IR spectra were obtained for samples previously heat treated under vacuum at 298, 323, 423 and 473 K. The spectra were recorded at room temperature after 100 cumulative scans with 4 cm-1 resolution. The measurements were carried out on a Bomem MB series spectrophotometer.

 

Results and discussions

Table 1 presents the results of the chemical analyses of the samples. The amounts of Zr(IV) loading in the two matrices are 8.4 and 15.4 wt%, corresponding to 0.92 and 1.68 mmol g-1 (amount of zirconium per gram of the sample), respectively. These samples will hereafter be designated as SiO2/ZrO2(I) and SiO2/ZrO2(II), for the first and second samples, respectively. Incorporation of Sb(V) on these two matrices were 6.3 and 11.4 wt% or 0.52 and 0.93 mmol g-1, respectively. These two samples will be hereafter designated as SiO2/ZrO2/Sb2O5(I) and SiO2/ZrO2/Sb2O5(II). The Sb/Zr mol ratios in both samples are nearly the same, 0.58 and 0.57, respectively. These values suggest that incorporation of Sb(V) onto the SiO2/ZrO2 matrices arises from the interaction of the metal ion with the surface Zr(IV). We may suppose that the reaction can be described by the following reaction:

 

 

where ≡ZrOH stands for hydrated zirconium oxide bonded to the SiO2 surface. This supposition is strongly supported by the fact that Sb(V) does not form stable Si-O-Sb bonds with ≡SiOH on the SiO2 surface at low pH, since it is easily hydrolyzed.3 The solubility of Sb(V) in acid solution was negligible, ~10-6 mol per gram of the material, determined by shaking the SiO2/ZrO2/Sb2O5 samples in 0.1 mol L-1 HCl solution for 24 h at 298 K.

The specific surface area, SBET, for SiO2/ZrO2/Sb2O5 is smaller for the sample with the higher amount of antimony loading, 590 m2g-1 for (I) and 440 m2g-1 for (II) and the average pore diameters are 0.73 and 0.69 nm, respectively.

UV-vis DRS

The UV-vis DRS spectra of SiO2/ZrO2 and SiO2/ZrO2/Sb2O5 samples are shown in Figure 1. The band maxima for SiO2/ZrO2 for the samples with 8.4 wt% (Figure 1b) and 15.4 wt% (Figure 1a) loadings of ZrO2 are observed in both cases at near 228 nm, which correspond to the oxygen to metal charge transfer transition of Zr(IV). Upon Sb(V) loading, the band maxima shift to the higher energy region, near 200 nm (Figures 1c and 1d). For bulk phase ZrO2, this band maximum is observed between 230-240 nm.16,17 The band shift to a lower wavelength region is normally associated with a high dispersion of Zr(IV) in the matrices, with formation of smaller particles. This may occur, in our case, due to the reaction of the immobilized Zr(IV) with Sb(V), as described in reaction (1), resulting a new highly dispersed zirconium-antimonate phase.

 

 

XPS results

Table 2 lists the binding energy (BE) values and the atomic ratios of interest. The Zr3d5/2 BE are observed at ca. 183 eV in SiO2/ZrO2 and SiO2/ZrO2/Sb2O5, a value which is slightly higher than that for bulk ZrO2, observed at 182.2 eV.18 This increase of the BE is related with stronger Zr-O bond polarization19 due to the interaction of Zr with both the surface ≡SiOH and with Sb(V). For both samples the Sb3d3/2 BE, in comparison with that of bulk phase Sb2O5 observed at 540.2 eV,20 did not show any significant change. On the surface, at the depth distance probed by XPS, the Zr/Si atomic ratios are 0.088 and 0.21 for SiO2/ZrO2 (I) and (II), respectively. These values roughly agree with the ZrBu4/TEOS molar ratios used for preparation of the samples, 0.061 and 0.14. This correspondence suggests that Zr(IV) oxide is highly and homogeneously dispersed in both matrices. The Sb/Si atomic ratios, for both SiO2/ZrO2/Sb2O5, are practically the same, i.e. 0.23 and 0.25.

Electron micrographs

Figure 2a shows the scanning electron microscopy (SEM) image of the SiO2/ZrO2/Sb2O5 with the higher antimony loading and Figures 2b and 2c the corresponding EDS images. The white points in Figures 2b and 2c are due to the metal emission lines ZrKα = 2.05 keV and SbLα = 3.6 keV,21 respectively. The SEM and EDS images show that, within the magnification used, the zirconium (IV) and antimony (V) oxide particles are homogeneously dispersed in the matrices with no detectable segregated phases.

 

 

X-ray diffraction

Table 3 lists the main X-ray diffraction peaks (intesities higher than 10) of standard SiO2 (cristobalite)22,23; ZrO2 baddeleyite22 and Sb2O522 and the observed peaks for SiO2/ZrO2/Sb2O5. Figures 3a to 3d shows the XRD patterns for SiO2/ZrO2/Sb2O5 samples heat treated from 773 up to 1573 K. For the material heated at 773 (3a) and 1023 K (3b), the absence of diffraction peaks indicates that the material is amorphous. At 1273 K (3c) the process of sample crystallization is observed. Increasing the temperature up to 1573 K, the crystallization process is completed. The peak at 30.3 (100), where the number in parenthesis is the relative intensity, is assigned to Sb2O5 because ZrO2 crystalline species (Table 3) does not show any peaks in this region. The most intense peak of ZrO2 is observed at 28.20 (100), and in SiO2/ZrO2/Sb2O5 it appears at 28.3 (60). For the bulk phase, a standard antimony oxide peak is observed at 28.7 (20) but, in this case, its intensity is considerably lower. The diffraction peak of antimony oxide (Figure 3e) at 14.80, despite its intensity, is not observed in Figure 3d. The peak observed at 21.90 in Figure 3e is due to the SiO2 as cristoballite (see Table 3), indicating that this phase is segregated for samples heat treated at 1573 K. The peak at 60.20 (40) in Figure 3d is not observed in antimony oxide or in zirconium oxide phases (see Table 3). This last peak is unequivocally assigned to a different phase, presumably formed by the reaction between Sb(V) and Zr(IV) on the matrix surface, but unfortunately, the structure of this phase is unknown.24

 

 

 

Acid properties

Figure 4 shows the IR spectra of pyridine adsorbed on SiO2/ZrO2/Sb2O5(I) heat treated at various temperatures from 323 to 573 K. Four vibrational modes assignable to the pyridine molecule are shown. The absorption band at 1445 cm-1, whose intensity changes for the sample heat treated at higher temperatures and practically disappears at 573 K, is assigned to the 19b mode of pyridine, attached by hydrogen bonds to unreacted ≡SiOH groups.3,25 The band at 1457 cm-1, which appears as a shoulder at 373 K and is clearly observable for sample heated at 573 K, is assigned to the pyridine 19b mode bonded to a Lewis acid site (LAS).26 This LAS is mainly due to the highly dispersed coordinatively unsaturated Sb(V) on the surface. For sample SiO2/ZrO2/Sb2O5(I), the XPS technique shows that atomic ratio Sb/Zr ~ 3 (calculated from data of Table 2) and taking into account the depth the technique can probe (about 30 nm in the present case), we can consider that at the matrix surface the concentration of antimony is nearly three times higher compared to zirconium. For chemical evidence that this assumption is correct, Alizarine Red S (AlizRS) dye was adsorbed from aqueous solution onto SiO2/ZrO2(I) and SiO2/ZrO2/Sb2O5(I) surfaces (Figure 5). It is well known that this reagent reacts with hydrated ZrO2 forming a 1:1 Zr/AlizRS complex whose maximum is observed as a broad band at about 500 nm (it is important to mention that Sb(V) and SiO2 do not react with AlizRS).27 The intensity of this band is considerably reduced, about 1/3 for SiO2/ZrO2/Sb2O5(I) in comparison with SiO2/ZrO2(I). As the bulk Sb2O5 and SiO2 do not present LAS3,28 the band at 1457 cm-1 in Figure 4 is mainly due to LAS on coordenatively unsaturated Sb(V) on the SiO2/ZrO2/Sb2O5(I) surface.

 

 

 

The band observed at 1491 cm-1 is the pyridine 19a mode and, practically, does not shift when sorbed in different sites.29 The band observed at 1545 cm-1 is due to the 19b mode of the pyridinium ion adsorbed on Brønsted acid sites (BAS).24,30 It is very important to observe that the band intensity of this mode remains unchanged even for a sample treated at 573 K. For bulk Sb2O5, this band is not observed for samples heat treated at this temperature, because the solid easily dehydrates and the BAS disappear.

 

Conclusions

SiO2/ZrO2 mixed oxide obtained by a sol-gel processing method adsorbs Sb(V) from acid solution forming a phase, not characterized, on the matrix surface. The materials obtained, SiO2/ZrO2/Sb2O5, have high surface areas, 590 and 440 m2 g-1 for the samples with lower and higher antimony contents, respectively. The Brønsted acid sites are thermally very stable, being observed for samples heated up to 573 K. This thermal stability results from the low surface density, δ = NoxN/SBET, where No and N are the amount of the zirconium-antimony oxide phase and Avogadro's number, respectively. Assuming that zirconium-antimony particles are homogeneously dispersed on the matrix the average inter-atomic distance, lij, can be estimated23 by applying the equation lij= (1/δ)1/2 . The estimated values are ca. 1.2 and 0.7 nm for SiO2/ZrO2/Sb2O5(I) and SiO2/ZrO2/Sb2O5(II), respectively. With these low surface densities of the zironium-antimony oxide particles on the matrix surface, the tendency of collapse into larger ones, with intermolecular loss of water and, consequently, reduction of the BAS and LAS on the surface, is minimized.19

 

Acknowledgements

G.Z. is indebted to Fundação de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP), Brazil, for a Post-Doctoral fellowship and Y.G. to FAPESP and FINEP/Pronex for financial support. English revision by Prof. Carol H. Collins is also acknowledged.

 

References

1. Abe M.; Ito T.; Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 1968, 41, 2366.         [ Links ]

2. Abe M.; Chitrakar R.; Tsuji M.; Fukumoto K.; Solv. Extr. Ion Exch. 1985, 3, 149.         [ Links ]

3. Benvenutti, E.V.; Gushikem, Y.; Davanzo, C.U.; C. de Castro, Sandra; Torriani, I.L.; J. Chem. Soc., Faraday Trans. 1992, 88, 3193.         [ Links ]

4. Gonçalves, J.E.; Gushikem, Y.; de Castro, S.C.; J. Non-Cryst. Solids 1999, 260, 125.         [ Links ]

5. Salvado, M.J.M.; Margaça, F.M.A.; Teixeira, J.; J. Non-Cryst. Solids 1993, 163, 115.         [ Links ]

6. De Lange, R.S.A.; Kleizer, J.H.A.; Burgraaf,; A.J.; J. Non-Cryst. Solids 1995, 191, 1.         [ Links ]

7. Haereid, S.; Dahle, M.; Lima, S.; Einarsud, M.A.; J. Non-Cryst. Solids 1995, 186, 96.         [ Links ]

8. Alfaya, A.A.S.; Gushikem Y.; J. Colloid Interface Sci. 1999, 209, 428.         [ Links ]

9. Turner, M.R.; Duguet, E.; Labrugere, C.; Surf. Interface Anal. 1997, 25, 917.         [ Links ]

10. Toba, M.; Mizukami, F.; Niva, S.; Sato, T.; Maeda, K.; Annila, A.; Komppa, V.; J. Mol. Catal. 1994 ,94, 85.         [ Links ]

11. Anderson J.A.; Fergusson C.; Rodriges-Ramos, I.; Guerrero-Ruiz, A.; J.Catal. 2000, 192, 344.         [ Links ]

12. de Monte, F.; Larsen, W.; Mackenzie, J.D.; J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2000, 83, 1506.         [ Links ]

13. Pickup, D.M.; Mountjoy G.; Wallidge, G.W.; Newport, R.J.; Smith, M.E.; Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 1999, 1, 2527.         [ Links ]

14. Alfaya, A.A.S.; Gushikem, Y.; de Castro, S.C.; Micr. Mesop. Mater. 2000, 39, 57.         [ Links ]

15. Scofield, J.H.; J. Electron Spectrosc. Relat. Phenom. 1976, 8, 129.         [ Links ]

16. Gao X.; Fierro, J.L.G. ; Wachs, I.E.; Langmuir 1999,15, 3169.         [ Links ]

17. Moon, S.C.; Fujino, M.; Yamashita H.; Anpo, M.; J. Phys. Chem. B 1997, 101, 369.         [ Links ]

18. Handbook of Photoelectron Spectroscopy; Perkin-Elmer, Eden Praine, 1992        [ Links ]

19. Alberti, G.; Costantino, U.; Marletta, G.; Puglisi, O.; Pignataro; S.; J. Inorg. Nucl. Chem. 1981, 43, 3329.         [ Links ]

20. Morgan, W.E.; Stec, W.J.; Van Wazer, J.R.; Inorg. Chem. 1973, 12, 953.         [ Links ]

21. Goodhew P.J.; Humphreys, F.J.; Electron Microscopy and Analysis, 2nd ed., Taylor and Francis: London, 1992.         [ Links ]

22. Powder Diffraction File Search Manual, The Joint Committee on Powder Diffraction Standards, Swarthmore, USA, 1997; afile 39-1425; bfile 37-1484; cfile 33-0111.         [ Links ]

23. Denofre, S.; Gushikem, Y.; de Castro, S.C.; Kawano, Y.; J. Chem. Soc., Faraday Trans. 1993, 89, 1057.         [ Links ]

24. Bhattacharyya, D.K.; Dutta, N.C.; J. Nucl. Sci. Technol. 1991, 28, 1014.         [ Links ]

25. Parry, E.P.; J. Catal. 1963, 2, 371.         [ Links ]

26. Morterra, C.; Cerrato, G.; Langmuir 1990, 6, 1810.         [ Links ]

27. Zittel, H.E.; Florence, T. M.; Anal. Chem. 1967, 39, 320.         [ Links ]

28. Benvenutti, E.V., Gushikem, Y.; Davanzo, C.U.; Appl. Spectrosc. 1992, 46, 1474.         [ Links ]

29. Connel, G.; Dumesic, J.A.; J. Catal. 1987, 105, 285.         [ Links ]

30. Lefrancois, M.; Malbois, G.; J. Catal. 1971, 20, 350.         [ Links ]

 

Received: July 4, 2001
Published on the web: August 23, 2002
FAPESP helped in meeting the publication costs of this article.

 

* e-mail: gushikem@iqm.unicamp.br

Creative Commons License All the contents of this journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License