- Citado por SciELO
- Citado por Google
- Similares en SciELO
- Similares en Google
versión impresa ISSN 0103-5053
versión On-line ISSN 1678-4790
J. Braz. Chem. Soc. v.14 n.2 São Paulo mar./abr. 2003
Boron isotope dilution in cellular fractions of coffee leaves Evaluated by Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry with direct injection nebulization (DIN-ICP-MS)
Ana Cláudia S. Bellato; Amauri A. Menegário; Maria Fernanda Giné
Centro de Energia Nuclear na Agricultura, Universidade de São Paulo, Av. Centenário 303, CP 96, 13400-970 Piracicaba-SP, Brazil
Enriched 10B (94.14 atom %) was supplied to coffee plantlets for three months. Then boron isotope ratios were determined in the leaf cell compartments, cell wall, nuclei and chloroplast, after a sub-cellular fractionation procedure. The isotopic measurements were performed by Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry (ICP-MS) provided with a direct injection nebulizer (DIN), introducing a sample volume of 50 mL. Isotopic ratios from 1.002 to 1.326 were determined with precision characterized by RSD lower than 1.5% for the enriched cell fractions with B concentrations ranging from 3.3 to 10.8 mg g-1. The detection limit (3s) was 0.5 ng B mL-1. The average enrichments in 10B atom % found in the cell walls, nuclei and chloroplasts were 46.7, 44.5 and 48.8, respectively.
Keywords: isotope dilution, inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry, biological cell fractionation, boron isotope ratios, plant analysis
A diluição isotópica do B enriquecido em 94,14 átomos % em 10B fornecido durante o cultivo de mudas de cafeeiro foi avaliada na parede celular, núcleo e cloroplastos de células foliares. Para isto foi necessária a determinação de 11B/10B em pequenos volumes de amostras conseguidas pelo processo de fracionamento por centrifugação diferenciada. As determinações isotópicas foram efetuadas por espectrometria de massas com fonte de plasma acoplado indutivamente (ICP-MS) utilizando-se nebulizador de injeção direta (DIN). Razões isotópicas de B entre 1,002 e 1,326 foram determinadas em 50 mL das amostras enriquecidas com precisão caracterizada por RSD<1,5%. As concentrações de B encontradas nas frações celulares variaram entre 3,3 e 10,8 mg g-1, e em média os átomos % de 10B foram 46,7; 44,5 e 48,8 na parede celular, núcleo e cloroplasto, respectivamente. O limite de detecção foi estimado em 0,5 ng B mL-1.
The interest in determining traces of boron has increased in recent years, since boron is an essential element for plants and may also be essential for animals and humans.1 Besides, the application of 10B in neutron capture therapy (BNCT) is increasing as well as its isotopic determination in biological tissues.2
Thermal ionization mass spectrometry (TI-MS) may be used for boron isotope ratio measurements with precisions ranging from 0.2 and 0.3%.3 The main disadvantage of this method is the time-consuming sample preparation. With inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) boron concentrations and isotope ratios are determined with minimal requirements in sample preparation.4
The principal concerns when using ICP-MS for B isotopic determinations concern memory effects and mass discrimination. Memory effects are mainly due to interactions of B with the heated quartz torch. Some authors use washout times of several minutes to reduce boron memory.5-6 Others use a sodium fluoride solution,7 Triton X-100 surfactant,8 mannitol9 or ammonia10 as washing agents. These methods slowly remove the memory effect when solutions with more than 0.5 mg L-1 of boron are analyzed. No memory effect occurs using direct injection nebulization (DIN). This device promotes liquid sample transport inside a capillary by pumping at high pressure, introducing its aerosol into the plasma, avoiding contact with the torch and spray chambers.11-12 Mass discrimination between 11B and 10B is accentuated due to the 10% isotopic mass difference and arises during ion transport caused by instrumental adjustments or by the sample matrix.13 The instrumental effect is corrected by analyzing a reference standard with a certified 11B/10B ratio (NIST SRM 951).14 The sample matrix effect on mass discrimination can be corrected using internal standards.12, 15-16
Also, for low-resolution quadrupole-based mass spectrometers, spectral overlap of 12C on 11B could occur, which is relevant for B isotope measurements in biological digests. Evans and Krahenbuhl7 noted a significant interference of 12C on B when analyzing microwave-digested samples using ICP-MS in the normal resolution mode (0.8 u). In the high-resolution mode (0.6 u) Gregoire14 reported good results for geological solutions, but not for biological digests.17
In the present paper, intrinsic 10B labeled coffee leaves were submitted to a sub-cellular fractionation procedure. Inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry with a direct injection nebulizer was used to determine boron isotope ratios from the separated cell walls, nuclei and chloroplasts.
A VG plasma Quad PQII ICP-MS, (VG Elemental, Winsford, Cheshire, UK) was used for isotopic measurements. A computer controlled direct injection nebulizer system, DIN, model Microneb 2000 (CETAC Technologies, Omaha, NE, USA) provided with two six-port solenoid valves, a gas displacement pump (GDP), and a quartz torch formed by four concentric tubes was used. A fused-silica capillary is inside the middle torch tube, and with the other tubes the nebulization, the auxiliary and the plasma gases are introduced. The ICP-MS and DIN operating conditions are shown in Table 1. An inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometer (ICP-OES) Optima 3000 DV (Perkin Elmer, Norwalk, USA) was employed for B and C determination at 249.773 nm and 193.3 nm, respectively. For sample preparation a Sorvall Super T21 refrigerated centrifuge (Du Pont, Wilmington, USA), a 801851 optical microscope (Nikon, Tokio, Japan) and silicone-treated paper (CalBiochem, San Diego, USA) were utilized for cell fractionation. A NT 245 water bath (Nova Técnica, Piracicaba, Brazil) and a 259E mechanical shaker (Fanem, São Paulo, Brazil) were used for sample preparation.
Reagents and solutions
Concentrated nitric and hydrochloric acids, pro-analyze quality (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany), purified by sub-boiling distillation, and water deionized to 18.2 MW cm in a Milli-Q system (Millipore, Bedford, MA, USA) were used throughout.
A stock solution of C (10000 mg L-1) was prepared from (COOH)2.2H2O (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany). Stock solutions of B (1000 mg L-1) were prepared from H3BO3 isotopic certified reference material, from National Institute of Standard and Technology (NIST SRM-951) and boric acid enriched in 10B (50 atom %), produced by the Instituto de Engenharia Nuclear (IEN, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil).
Working solutions of B (25 mg L-1) and B + C (25 mg L-1 + 2000 mg L-1) were prepared by appropriate dilutions in 1 mol L-1 HCl from the certified B stock solutions and C stock solution. Solutions of 2% v/v HNO3, 0.05 mol L-1 Tris-HCl (tris-[hydroxymethyl] aminomethane, Sigma, St. Louis, USA) and 0.3 mol L-1 sucrose (Merck), adjusted to pH 7, were also prepared.
Coffee plantlets were cultivated in nutrient solutions for 3 months. Nine plantlets received H3BO3 enriched with 94.14 atom % 10B (enriched sample), and four plantlets received H3BO3 in natural isotope composition (control sample). At the end of the treatment plants were collected and separated into leaves, stems and roots.
Samples of leaves, stems and roots from six plants were rinsed in deionized water and dried at 50 °C in a drying oven. The dried samples were ground until passing through a 20-mesh screen. After that, the extraction of B was carried out by using 100 mg of sample mixed with 5 mL of 1 mol L-1 HCl and heating in a water bath at 80 °C for 15 min. The cold solutions were shaken for 1 h at 250 rpm and filtered (Whatman-40).
The leaves of seven plants were destined for cell fractionation and isotopic analysis. The cell fractionation steps are shown in Figure 1.
The fractionation procedure was performed at cold-room temperature (10 °C) using N2 cryogenic grinding and a refrigerated centrifuge in order to minimize possible enzymatic changes in the sub-cellular components. The rupturing of the cell wall was performed in a blender using Tris-HCl and sucrose. This medium preserved the structure of the cell components since it constituted of an isotonic solution that guarantees the osmotic activity while the buffering characteristics of Tris-HCl maintained the pH during the release of organic acid from the ruptured vacuoles. Confirmation of each separated component was corroborated by optical microscopy. Then, the B present in the separated fractions (cell walls, nuclei and chloroplasts) were extracted with 1 mol L-1 HCl. A blank solution of the extractor was used to determine the limit of detection.
Results and Discussion
Total B concentrations were determined in leaves, stems and roots from three replicates of two controls and four plants that received the enriched 10B. No difference in total B concentrations was noticed between samples with and without enriched B. The B concentrations were 78.3 ± 2.6 mg g-1 in leaves, 55.6 ± 2.6 mg g-1 in stems and 69.1 ± 2.4 mg g-1 in roots.
From 2 g of fresh leaves and after the fractionation steps, around 800 mg of cell walls, 200 mg of nuclei and 300 mg chloroplasts were separated. Sub-samples of 100 mg were extracted, producing around 4 mL of solution for determining total B concentration and the isotope ratios. Results presented in Table 2 correspond to total B determined by ICP-OES in each cellular fraction of the different samples. The low variance of results in each fraction reflects the high reproducibility of the process. The average content of B in the fractions was around 20 mg per g of fresh leaves with 70% of humidity, that means that 83% of the total B is in the analyzed cell compartments.
The small sample volumes obtained after B extraction were used to perform several analyses using the DIN system. Injected volumes of 20, 50 and 100 mL of a 25 mg L-1 B standard solution were transported through the capillary to the plasma by the 2% v/v HNO3 carrier solution pressurized by gas at 827 kPa. Under these conditions the transient signals presented in Figure 2 were attained monitoring m/z 11. A rapid increase after sample injection, a steady state dependent on the injected volume and a long slowdown characterize the peaks. Returning the injection valve to the original position the baseline is attained faster. The B isotope ratios were measured during 30 s, thus, a 50 mL sample volume was chosen. The ICP-MS data acquisition was synchronized with the DIN injection, programming a delay of 5 s to start acquisition after sample injection to ensure that data were collected at the peak maximum.
Results of boron isotope measurements by ICP-MS were affected by mass discrimination due to the gas pressure forming the aerosol by DIN, as shown in Figure 3. The nebulization conditions affect 10B and 11B measurements, consequently, the 11B/10B ratio. The closest isotope ratio for the certified standard solution NIST 951 (4.044) was obtained at 550 kPa. The total mass bias on B isotope ratio determination was calculated by comparing the reference and measured values of a 25 mg L-1 of NIST 951. The mass bias was less than 3%, which was lower than reported early values.18-19 The detection limit of 0.5 ng B mL-1 was calculated from data (3 s) obtained by 10 sequential measurements at m/z 10 of the blank solution.
The residual carbon contents in the sub-cellular solutions determined by ICP-OES were lower than 2000 mg L-1. Adjusting the resolution to 0.6 u using the criteria of 10% peak height, the overlap of 12C on the 11B signals in the ICP-MS was minimized. This parameter was defined by analyzing a solution containing 25 mg L-1 of the IEN standard (11B/10B = 1) alone and with 2000 mg L-1 of C.
Results presented in Table 3 correspond to B isotope ratios corrected for instrumental mass bias, following the recommendations of Gregoire.14 The atom % of 10B were calculated from the relation: atom % 10B = 100 / R+1, with R being the isotope ratio. The precision of the 11B/10B measurements was characterized by RSD lower than 1.5%. The control samples presented isotope ratios from 3.976 to 4.062, which are close to those reported in other agricultural studies.4 Isotope ratios ranges from 1.111 to 1.171 in the cell walls, from 1.195 to 1.340 in the nuclei and from 0.9920 to 1.074 in the chloroplast samples were found. These ratios reflect a slight discrimination between fractions. In terms of atom % 10B, the chloroplasts present values on average 2 atom % higher than the cell wall and 4 atom % more than the nuclei. The 10B atom % found in the samples was two times higher than that of the controls, as a consequence of the addition of 3 mg (94.14 atom %) of 10B per plant.
The feasibility of evaluation of the isotope dilution of 10B in compartments produced by cell fractionation of leaves was demonstrated by obtaining reliable experimental data using ICP-MS and DIN.
In terms of comparison with the control sample, the 10B enrichment was approximately 29, 27 and 25 atom % in the chloroplast, cell wall and nucleus fractions, respectively, which were well discriminated by the proposed methodology.
This work received financial support from FAPESP (Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo) and CNPq/ PRONEX.
1. Sah, R.N.; Brown, P.H.; Microchemical J. 1997, 56, 285. [ Links ]
2. Moreton, J.A.; Delves, H.T.; J. Anal. At. Spectrom. 1999, 14, 1545. [ Links ]
3. Vanderpool, R.A.; Johnson, P.E.; J. Agric. Food Chem. 1992, 40, 462. [ Links ]
4. Vanderpool, R.A.; Hoff, D.; Johnson, P.E.; Environm. Health Persp. 1994, 102, 13. [ Links ]
5. Ward, N.I.; Abou-Shakra, S.; Durrant, S.F.; Biol. Trace Elemental Res. 1990, 26, 177. [ Links ]
6. Vanhoe, H.; Dams, R.; Vandecasteele, C.; Versieck, J.; Anal. Chim. Acta. 1993, 281, 401. [ Links ]
7. Evans, E.; Krahenbuhl, U.; J. Anal. At. Spectrom. 1994, 9, 1249. [ Links ]
8. Probst, T.U.; Berryman, N.G.; Lemmen, P.; Weissfloch, L.; Auberger, T.; Gabel, D.; Carlsson, J.; Larsson, B. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. 1997, 12, 1115. [ Links ]
9. Sun, D.H.; Ma, R.L.; McLeod, C.W.; Wang, X.R.; Cox, A.G.; J. Anal. At. Spectrom. 2000, 15, 257. [ Links ]
10. al-Ammar, a.; gupta, r. k.; barnes, r. m.; Spectrochim. Acta - Part B 1999, 54, 1077. [ Links ]
11. Smith, F.; Wiederin, D.R.; Houk, R.S.; Egan, C.B.; Serfass, R.E.; Anal. Chim. Acta, 1991, 248, 229. [ Links ]
12. Bellato, A.C.S.; Menegário, A.A.; Giné, M.F.; Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 2001, 32, 1981. [ Links ]
13. Evans, E.H.; Giglio, J.J.; J. Anal. At. Spectrom. 1993, 8, 1. [ Links ]
14. Gregoire, D.C; Anal. Chem. 1987, 59, 2479. [ Links ]
15. Gregoire, D.C.; J. Anal. At. Spectrom. 1990, 5, 623. [ Links ]
16. al-Ammar, a.; Reitznerová, e.; barnes, r. m.; Spectrochim. Acta - Part B 2000, 55, 1861. [ Links ]
17. Nyomora, A.M.; Sah, R.N.; Brown, P.H.; Fresenius J. Anal. Chem. 1997, 357, 1185. [ Links ]
18. Porteous, N.C.; Walsh, J.N.; Jarvis, K.E.; Analyst 1995, 120, 1397. [ Links ]
19. Heumann, K. G.; Gallus, S.M.; Rädlinger G.; Vogl, J.; J. Anal. At. Spectrom. 1998, 13, 1001. [ Links ]
Maria Fernanda Giné
Received: October 19, 2002
Published on the web: March 21, 2003
FAPESP helped in meeting the publication costs of this article