Optimized and validated spectrophotometric methods for the determination of lisinopril in pharmaceutical formulations using ninhydrin and ascorbic acid

Abstracts

Two simple and sensitive spectrophotometric methods are described for the determination of lisinopril in pure form and pharmaceutical preparations. The first method is based on the reaction of the drug with ninhydrin in N,N'-dimethylformamide (DMF) medium at room temperature which is followed spectrophotometrically by measuring the increase in absorbance at 595 nm as a function of time. The initial-rate, rate-constant and fixed-time (at 10 minutes) procedures were used for constructing the calibration graphs to determine the concentration of the drug. The initial-rate and fixed-time procedures showed a linear response over the concentration range 10-50 µg mL-1 whereas rate-constant procedure was applicable in the range 10-40 µg mL-1. In the second method, the drug reacts with ascorbic acid in DMF medium resulting in the formation of a coloured product, which absorbed maximally at 530 nm. Beer's law is obeyed in the concentration 5-50 µg mL-1 of lisinopril with molar absorptivity of 4.548<FONT FACE=Symbol>´</FONT>10³ L mol-1 cm-1. The variables affecting the development of the colour are optimized and the developed methods are validated statistically and through recovery studies. The proposed methods have been successfully applied to the determination of lisinopril in commercial tablets.

lisinopril; ninhydrin; ascorbic acid; dimethylformamide

Dois métodos espectrofotométricos, simples e sensíveis, são descritos para a determinação de lisinoprila pura e em preparações farmacêutica. O primeiro método é baseado na reação da droga com nihidrina, no solvente N, N'-dimetilformamida (DMF) a temperatura ambiente, a qual é acompanhada espectrofotometricamente pela medida do aumento da absorbância a 595 nm, em função do tempo. As técnicas de medida da velocidade inicial, da determinação da constante de velocidade e de medida em tempo fixo (10 min) foram adotadas na construção das curvas de calibração, para a determinação da concentração da droga. Os métodos de velocidade inicial e da medida em tempo fixo mostraram uma resposta linear no intervalo de concentração 10-50 µg mL-1, enquanto o método de constante de velocidade tem resposta linear no intervalo 10-40 µg mL-1. No segundo método, a droga reage com ácido ascórbico em solução de DMF, resultando num produto colorido com máximo de absorbância a 530 nm. A lei de Beer é obedecida no intervalo de concentração 5-50 µg mL-1 de linisoprila, com absortividade molar de 4,548<FONT FACE=Symbol>´</FONT>10³ L mol-1 cm-1. As variáveis que afetam o desenvolvimento da cor foram otimizadas, e o método foi validado estatisticamente e por estudos de recuperação. O método proposto foi usado com sucesso na determinação de lisinoprila em comprimidos comerciais.

ARTICLE

Optimized and validated spectrophotometric methods for the determination of lisinopril in pharmaceutical formulations using ninhydrin and ascorbic acid

Nafisur Rahman^*; Manisha Singh; Md. Nasrul Hoda

Department of Chemistry, Aligarh Muslim University, Aligarh-202002 (U.P.) India

ABSTRACT

Two simple and sensitive spectrophotometric methods are described for the determination of lisinopril in pure form and pharmaceutical preparations. The first method is based on the reaction of the drug with ninhydrin in N,N'-dimethylformamide (DMF) medium at room temperature which is followed spectrophotometrically by measuring the increase in absorbance at 595 nm as a function of time. The initial-rate, rate-constant and fixed-time (at 10 minutes) procedures were used for constructing the calibration graphs to determine the concentration of the drug. The initial-rate and fixed-time procedures showed a linear response over the concentration range 10-50 µg mL^-1 whereas rate-constant procedure was applicable in the range 10-40 µg mL^–1. In the second method, the drug reacts with ascorbic acid in DMF medium resulting in the formation of a coloured product, which absorbed maximally at 530 nm. Beer's law is obeyed in the concentration 5-50 µg mL^-1 of lisinopril with molar absorptivity of 4.548´10³ L mol^-1 cm^-1. The variables affecting the development of the colour are optimized and the developed methods are validated statistically and through recovery studies. The proposed methods have been successfully applied to the determination of lisinopril in commercial tablets.

Keyword: lisinopril, ninhydrin, ascorbic acid, dimethylformamide

RESUMO

Dois métodos espectrofotométricos, simples e sensíveis, são descritos para a determinação de lisinoprila pura e em preparações farmacêutica. O primeiro método é baseado na reação da droga com nihidrina, no solvente N, N'-dimetilformamida (DMF) a temperatura ambiente, a qual é acompanhada espectrofotometricamente pela medida do aumento da absorbância a 595 nm, em função do tempo. As técnicas de medida da velocidade inicial, da determinação da constante de velocidade e de medida em tempo fixo (10 min) foram adotadas na construção das curvas de calibração, para a determinação da concentração da droga. Os métodos de velocidade inicial e da medida em tempo fixo mostraram uma resposta linear no intervalo de concentração 10-50 µg mL^-1, enquanto o método de constante de velocidade tem resposta linear no intervalo 10-40 µg mL^-1. No segundo método, a droga reage com ácido ascórbico em solução de DMF, resultando num produto colorido com máximo de absorbância a 530 nm. A lei de Beer é obedecida no intervalo de concentração 5-50 µg mL^-1 de linisoprila, com absortividade molar de 4,548´10³ L mol^-1 cm^-1. As variáveis que afetam o desenvolvimento da cor foram otimizadas, e o método foi validado estatisticamente e por estudos de recuperação. O método proposto foi usado com sucesso na determinação de lisinoprila em comprimidos comerciais.

Introduction

Lisinopril, 1-[N-[(S)-1-carboxy-3-phenylpropyl]-L-lysyl]-L-proline dihydrate, is an angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor. It is used in the treatment of hypertension and heart failure. The increasing use of this recently introduced drug, which is highly susceptible to the acidic degradation, needs simple, sensitive and selective method for the routine analysis in pharmaceutical formulations.

Certain successful attempts have been made for the determination of lisinopril using different analytical techniques. The generally used analytical techniques are liquid chromatography,¹ HPTLC,² polarography,³ capillary electrophoresis,^4,5 chemiluminescence,⁶ HPLC,^7,8 and potentiometric titration.⁹ Of course, the above mentioned techniques are sensitive but expensive. Spectrophotometry is the technique of choice even today due to its inherent simplicity. It is frequently used in the laboratories of the developing countries to overcome versatile analytical problems. In the literature, few spectrophotometric methods have been reported for its determination. Lisinopril has been determined in the visible region based on the reaction with sodium hypochlorite and phenylhydrazine,² chloranil,¹⁰ dichlone,¹⁰ acetylacetone and formaldehyde,¹⁰ 1,2-napthoquinone-4-sulphonic acid,¹¹ 2,4,6-trinitro-benzoic acid,¹² 2,4-dinitroflurobenzene¹³ and 7-chloro-4-nitrobenzo-2-oxa-1, 3-diazole.¹⁴ Panzade and co-workers¹⁵ have reported a UV spectrophotometric method for the quantification of lisinopril at 205 nm. Beer's law was obeyed in the concentration range of 3-30 µg mL^-1. The literature¹⁶ revealed that the reaction of ninhydrin has been used earlier for the direct spectro-photometric determination of lisinopril after heating on a water bath for 10 minutes. A derivative spectropho-tometric procedure¹⁷ for the simultaneous determination of amlodipine and lisinopril was developed. In this method, the drug was extracted in 0.1 mol L^-1 HCl and zero crossing point technique was employed to determine the amounts of individual drugs in the combined preparations. Jain and coworkers¹⁸ have discussed two procedures for simultaneous deter-mination of amlodipine besylate and lisinopril in tablets. The first method was based on the development of two equations for area calculation of curve at two wavelength regions. The second method employed multicomponent mode of analysis over the range 300-190 nm using four sampling points 300, 271, 242 and 213 nm. The lisinopril was also determined in pharma-ceutical formulations using ratio spectra derivative spectrophotometry¹⁹ and derivative spectrophoto-metry.^2,3,19,20 The literature is still poor with regard to the kinetic spectrophotometric method of analysis. As far as our knowledge is concerned, no kinetic spectro-photometric method is reported for the assay of lisinopril. The following specific advantages associated with the kinetic method²¹ can be expected: (i) method is considerably simpler and faster since some of the experimental steps (i.e., heating on water bath and cooling) prior to absorbance measurements have been eliminated; (ii) more selectivity since it involves the measure of evolution of absorbance as a function of reaction time instead of the measure of a concrete absorbance value; (iii) the coloured and/or turbidity background of the samples most likely does not interfere with the determination; (iv) other active compounds present in dosage form may not interfere if they resist optimized chemical reaction conditions of the proposed kinetic method.

The kinetic approach for determining lisinopril in commercial dosage form using ninhydrin as a reagent reduces the time of analysis as it does not required heating and cooling of the reaction mixture.

Ninhydrin is a well-established reagent for the determination of certain amines, amino acids and thiophenes.²² It has been extensively used in the determination of the compounds of pharmaceutical importance and in the kinetic studies.^23-25 Ascorbic acid has been used²⁶ as a sensitive reagent for the specific determination of aliphatic amines in N,N'-dimethyl-formamide (DMF) medium without elucidating the mechanism of the reaction. In this laboratory, we have used ascorbic acid as a reagent for the determination of a pharmaceutical possessing aliphatic amino group and proposed a reaction mechanism after an appropriate study.²⁷

In the present manuscript, two sensitive spectro-photometric methods for the determination of lisinopril in DMF medium have been described. The first method is based on the reaction of lisinopril with ninhydrin at room temperature for which a kinetic approach has been adopted. The second method is based on the reaction of lisinopril with ascorbic acid. The proposed methods have been successfully applied to the determination of lisinopril in pharmaceutical formulations.

Experimental

Apparatus

Bausch and Lomb Spectronic 20D⁺ spectrophotometer (Milton Roy, USA) was used for measurement.

Reagents and materials

DMF (spectroscopy grade) and ascorbic acid (AR-grade) were obtained from S.D. Fine Chemicals, India. Ninhydrin was purchased from Merck-Schuchardt, Germany. The 0.1% solution of lisinopril was prepared by dissolving 100 mg of pure lisinopril (M/s. Zydus Cadila Healthcare Limited, India) in 10 mL of doubly distilled water into a 100 mL volumetric flask and finally made up to the mark with DMF. Further dilutions were made according to the need using 9:1 mixture of DMF:Water. The 2% ninhydrin solution was prepared in DMF. Ascorbic acid solution (0.2%) was prepared by dissolving 100 mg in 0.5 mL of distilled water, in a 50 mL standard flask and completing the volume with DMF.

Preparation of the acid induced degradation product

Lisinopril dihydrate (50 mg) was transferred into a conical flask and then 50 mL of 50% H₂SO₄ was added. It was refluxed for 2h at 100°C. After cooling, the solution was neutralized with calcium carbonate and filtered. The filtrate was evaporated to dryness and the residue was tested for complete degradation using TLC plate coated with silica gel-G and chloroform - ethyl acetate - acetic acid (10:3:2 v/v) as mobile phase. A single spot was observed at R_f = 0.17 whereas no spot was detected at R_f = 0.31 corresponding to lisinopril dihydrate.

Recommended procedures

Ninhydrin method. Aliquots of 0.05% lisinopril corresponding to 50-250 µg were transferred into a series of 5 mL standard volumetric flasks. To each flask, 1.7 mL of 2% ninhydrin solution was added and diluted to volume with DMF. The contents of the mixture were mixed well and increase in absorbance at 595 nm was recorded as a function of time against the reagent blank at room temperature. The initial rate of reaction at different concentration was calculated from the initial slope of absorbance time curve. The calibration curves were constructed by plotting (i) logarithm of initial-rate of reaction versus logarithm of molar concentration, (ii) rate-constant versus final concentration, and (iii) absorbance measured at a fixed-time of 10 minutes versus final concentration of lisinopril.

Ascorbic acid method. Into a series of boiling tubes, increasing volumes of 0.05% lisinopril were quantitatively transferred so as to contain the drug within the concentration range of 5-50 µg mL^-1. To each tube, 2 mL of ascorbic acid solution (0.2%) was added and volumes were maintained to 5 mL with DMF. The solutions were heated on a water bath at 100 ±1°C for 15 minutes. The solutions were cooled at room temperature. The contents of each tube were transferred to a 10 mL standard flasks and completed to volume with DMF. The absorbances were measured at 530 nm against the reagent blank prepared simultaneously within the stability period of 3h. The calibration curve was constructed by plotting the absorbance versus final concentration of the lisinopril. The content of the drug was computed either from calibration curve or regression equation.

Analysis of pharmaceutical formulations. 10 tablets equivalent to 100 mg of the lisinopril were powdered and transferred into a small flask with 50 mL methanol and stirred. The extract was filtered into 100 mL volumetric flask and diluted to volume with methanol. The filtrate was evaporated to dryness. The residue was dissolved with 10 mL distilled water and diluted to 100 mL with DMF. The assay of lisinopril was completed following the recommended procedures.

Results and Discussion

It has been suggested²⁸ that ninhydrin was converted to o-carboxyphenylglyoxal in alkaline medium which would reduce ninhydrin to 2-hydroxyindan-1,3-dione. In the present study, it combines with –NH₂ group of lisinopril to form amino derivative, which further undergoes condensation with ninhydrin to give diketohydrindylindene-diketohydrindamine (Figure 1).

Lisinopril, as a primary amine, reacts with ascorbic acid in DMF medium to produce a coloured product, which absorbed maximally at 530 nm (Figure 1). Under the specified experimental conditions, ascorbic acid undergoes oxidation resulting in the formation of dehydroascorbic acid.²⁹ The carbonyl group of dehydroascorbate reacts with –NH₂ group of lisinopril to form a purple coloured condensation product. By analogy to previous report,²⁷ the reaction is proposed to proceed as shown in Scheme 1.

Optimization of reaction variables

The reaction between lisinopril and ninhydrin in DMF resulted in the formation of diketohydrindylindene-diketohydrindamine. At room temperature (~25 °C), the intensity of colour increased with time and became stable after 45 minutes of reagent mixing. The effect of ninhydrin concentration on reaction rate was investigated using 0.8-2.4 mL of 2.0% ninhydrin. It was found that increasing the volume of 2.0% ninhydrin solution would increase the absorbance of the reaction product up to 1.5 mL, after which further increase in the volume of ninhydrin resulted in no change in the absorbance of reaction product. Thus, 1.7 mL of 2.0% ninhydrin was adopted as the most suitable volume for maximum absorbance.

The reaction of lisinopril and ascorbic acid in DMF medium involves two variables i.e. heating time and concentration of ascorbic acid. To study the effect of heating time for ascorbic acid method, 500 mg of lisinorpil was mixed with 2.0 mL of 0.2% ascorbic acid in a boiling tube and heated on a water bath at 100 ± 1°C. The absorbance was measured at 530 nm as a function of time. It was observed (Figure 2) that the absorbance remained constant between 14 and 21 minutes of heating. Thus, 16 minutes of heating time was selected as an optimum value. The influence of volume of 0.2% ascorbic acid was critically examined. It is evident from Figure 2 that the maximum absorbance was obtained with 1.5 mL and above this volume the absorbance remained unaffected. Therefore, 2 mL of 0.2% ascorbic acid was used throughout the experiment.

The stoichiometric ratio between ninhydrin and lisinopril was established by the limiting logarithmic method using two sets of the experiments. In the first set, lisinopril concentration was varied keeping ninhydrin concentration constant and vice versa in the second set of experiment. The logarithms of the absorbance thus obtained were plotted against the respective logarithms of the molar concentrations. The slopes of the two straight lines were obtained to be unity in each case, which indicated the combining molar ratio between lisinopril and ninhydrin is 1:1 (Figure 3).

Kinetic study using ninhydrin

Initial-rate method. The initial rates of the reaction were determined from the measurements of the slopes of the initial tangents to the absorbance – time curves (Figure 4). The order with respect to lisinopril was ascertained by studying the reaction at different concentrations of lisinopril keeping a constant concen-tration of ninhydrin. For each run, a plot of log A_¥/A_¥–A_t versus time is a straight line confirming the first order reaction. The first order rate constants were evaluated from the slopes of the plots of log A_¥/A_¥–A_tversus time. All subsequent investigations were also performed with different concentrations of ninhydrin with a fixed concentration of lisinopril. The plot of log A_¥/A_¥–A_t versus time also indicated a first order kinetics with respect to ninhydrin concentration.

Under the optimized experimental parameters, ninhydrin concentration was used in excess in order to work out pseudo-first order condition. Therefore, the initial rate of reaction under pseudo-first order conditions would obey the following equation:

Rate = DA/Dt = k'Cⁿ

Where, k' is the pseudo-first order rate constant, C is the concentration of lisinopril, n is the order of reaction. The above equation may be written in logarithmic form as

log rate = log k' + n log C

The slope, intercept and correlation coefficient were evaluated by linear regression analysis of calibration data (Table 1). The regression of log rate versus log C gave a linear regression equation,

log rate = 3.078 + 1.076 log C

The value of n in the regression equation also indicated the first order reaction with respect to lisinopril concen-tration. The calibration curve constructed by plotting log rate versus log molar concentration of lisinopril showed a linear relationship over the concentration range of 10-50 µg mL^-1.

Rate-constant method. Under pseudo-first order condition, the rate constants corresponding to different concentrations of lisinopril were calculated from the slopes of log A_¥/A_¥–A_t versus time and are summarized in Table 2. The calibration graph was constructed by plotting rate constant against the lisinopril concentration, which showed a linear response over the concentration range of 10-40 µg mL^-1. The regression equation, correlation coefficient, detection limit, variance and standard analytical error are presented in Table 1.

Fixed time method. At a preselected fixed time, the absorbance was measured at 595 nm against reagent blank. The calibration graphs of absorbance versus initial concentration of lisinopril were established at fixed time of 4, 6, 8, 10 and 12 minutes. Under the established working condition, regression equations were developed and important analytical parameters have been calculated (Table 3). It is evident from Table 3 that the most acceptable values of correlation coefficient, detection limit and variance were obtained at a fixed time of 10 minutes. Therefore, the fixed time of 10 minutes was utilized for assay of lisinopril concentration.

Ascorbic acid method: Under the optimum experimental conditions, the linear calibration graph was obtained over the concentration range 5-50 µg mL^-1. The calibration data were fitted by least square treatment and the corresponding calibration equation along with the relevant analytical parameters are summarized in Table 1.

Under the optimum experimental conditions, the values of slopes of the regression equations of the proposed methods indicate good sensitivity. The small values of the variance speak about the negligible scattering of the calibration data points around the line of regressions for all the proposed procedures. The high values of correlation coefficients obtained for regression equations exhibit good linearity of the methods. The significance of correlation coefficients was evaluated by calculating the t-values using the following formula.³⁰

The calculated values were found to be 26.07, 23.10, 70.68 and 55.87 for initial-rate, rate-constant, fixed-time and ascorbic acid methods, respectively. Thus, it can be concluded that there is significant relationship between the concentration of lisinopril and the variables used in the development of regression equations.

To check the precision as well as accuracy of the proposed methods, independent repeatability studies were performed with six repetitions for each method. The results are summarized in Table 4. The obtained data show that the methods are reproducible as well as accurate.

The performance of the proposed methods was compared with that of other existing UV-visible spectrophotometric methods (Table 5). It is apparent from table that the values of molar absorptivity of the proposed methods (ascorbic acid and fixed time methods) are greater than that of other methods except the methods using chloranil and acetylacetone but these methods are more tedious to perform. The values of LOD and LOQ of initial rate method are smaller than that of the other existing spectrophotometric methods whereas ascorbic acid method has somewhat higher LOD and LOQ values than that of the method using 7-chloro-4-nitrobenzo-2-oxa-1,3-diazole but it requires longer heating time for reaction to occur. The proposed ninhydrin method is much superior than the other reported method¹⁶ as its does not require heating in a boiling water bath. Thus the methods are found to be simple and can compete with the existing spectrophotometric methods in determining the drug in lower concentrations.

The reliability of the proposed methods was checked by the standard addition method. The results (Table 6) show that the mean recoveries were found in the range 99.25 - 101.29 with RSD < 1.5%, 99.05 – 99.59% with RSD < 1.4%, 99.12 – 99.98% with RSD < 0.5% and 99.66 – 100.80 with RSD < 0.7%. Common excipients in tablets such as talc, lactose, starch or magnesium stearate did not interfere with the assay.

The analysis of lisinopril in commercial tablets was performed using the proposed procedures and reference method.¹⁰ The results obtained were compared statistically by the student's t-test and variance ratio F-test (Table 7). The experimental t- and F- values did not exceed the theoretical ones at 95% confidence level, indicating the absence of any significant difference between the compared methods. The interval hypothesis tests³¹ have also been performed to compare the results of the proposed procedures (initial-rate, rate-constant, fixed-time or ascorbic acid) with those of reference method at 95% confidence level. In pharmaceutical analysis, a bias of ±2% is permissible. The results show that the data are within the limit of the interval at 95% confidence level.

As far as the selectivity of the method is concerned, the kinetic approach based on the reaction of lisinopril – ninhydrin was found to be highly selective for the determination of lisinopril at 25 °C. The acidic degradation product was found not to react significantly with ninhydrin in DMF medium at room temperature and is tolerable up to 90%.

Conclusion

Though both the methods are suitable for the routine analysis of lisinopril in commercial dosage forms but the ascorbic acid method is economical in comparison to the ninhydrin method. However, the ninhydrin method is selective for lisinopril and is suitable for the analysis of lisinopril in pure as well as commercial dosage forms in the presence of its acidic degradation product.

Acknowledgement

The authors are thankful to the Chairman, Department of Chemistry, Aligarh Muslim University, Aligarh, for providing the research facilities and to M/s Zydus Cadila Healthcare Limited, India for the gift sample of pure lisinopril. One of the authors (M.N. Hoda) is also thankful to C.S.I.R., India, for the continuous financial assistance by awarding Senior Research Fellowship.

Received: January 6, 2005

Published on the web: August 3, 2005

• 1. Rzen, J.; Senica, D.; Acta Chim. Slov. 2001, 48, 597.
• 2. El-Gindy, A.; Ashour, A.; Abdel-Fattah, L.; J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 2001, 25, 913.
• 3. Rajasekaran, A.; Murugesan, S.; Asian J. Chem. 2001, 13, 1245.
• 4. Hillaert, S.; Van den Bosscha, W.; J. Chromatogr: A 2000, 895, 33.
• 5. Gotti, R.; Adrisano, V.; Cavrini, V.; J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 2000, 22, 423.
• 6. Ouyang, J.; Baeyens, W. R. G.; Talanta 1998, 46, 961.
• 7. Sane, R. T.; Valiyare, G. R.; Deshmukh, U. M.; Singh, S. R.; Indian Drugs 1992, 29, 558.
• 8. United States Pharmacopoeia XXIII, National Formulary 18, United State Pharmacopoeial Convention: Rockville, MD, 1995, p. 895.
• ⁹
  European Pharmacopoeia, Council of Europe, 1997, 1105.
• 10. El-Yazbi, A. F.; Abdine, H. H.; J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 1999, 19, 819.
• 11. Iskender, G.; Yarenci, B.; Acta Pharm. Turc. 1995, 37, 5.
• 12. Atmaca, S.; Tatar, S.; Iskender, G.; Acta Pharm. Turc. 1994, 36, 13.
• 13. Abdel Razak, O.; Belal, S.F.; Bedair, M. M.; Barakat, N. S.; Haggag, R. S.; J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal 2003, 31, 701.
• 14. El-Emam, A. A.; Steen Honore Hansen; Moustafa, M. A.; El-Ashry, S. M.; El-Sherbiny, D. T.; J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal 2004, 34, 35.
• 15. Panzade, P. D.; Mahadek, L. R.; Indian Drugs 1999, 36, 321.
• 16. Rajasekaran, A.; Udayavani, S.; J. Indian Chem. Soc 2001, 78, 485.
• 17. Prasad, C. V. N.; Saha, R. N.; Parimoo, P.; Pharm. Pharmacol. Commun. 1999, 5, 383.
• 18. Jain, H. K.; Agrawal, R. K.; Indian Drugs 2000, 37, 196.
• 19. Erk, N.; Spectrosc. Lett. 1998, 31, 633.
• 20. Ozer, D.; Senel, H.; J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 1999, 21, 691.
• 21. Espinosa-Mansilla, A.; Acedo-Valenzuela, M. I.; Salinas, F.; Canada-Canada, F.; Analytica Chimica Acta 1998, 376, 365.
• 22. Fiegel F.; Spot Tests in Organic Analysis, Elsevier Publishing Co.: London, 1960.
• 23. Rahman, N.; Azmi, S. N. H.; IL Farmaco 2001, 56, 731.
• 24. Rahman, N.; Kashif, M.; IL Farmaco 2003, 58, 1045.
• 25. Campins-Falco, P.; Sevillano-Cabza, A.; Gallo-Martinez, L.; Bosch-Reig, F.; Anal. Chim. Acta 1996, 324, 199.
• 26. Snell, F. D.; Snell, C. T.; Colourimetric Methods of Analysis (Including Photometric Methods), D. Van Nostrand Company, Inc.: Princeton, New Jersey, London, 1967, 4-A, p. 243.
• 27. Rahman, N.; Hoda, M.N.; J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 2003, 31, 381.
• 28. McCaldin, D.J.; Chemical Review 1960, 60, 39.
• 29. Sandulescu, R.; Mirel, S.; Oprean, R.; J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 2000, 23, 77.
• 30. Miller, J.N.; Miller, J.C.; Statistics and Chemometrics for Analytical Chemistry, Pearson Education Limited: England, 2000.
• 31. Hartmann, C.; Smeyers-Verbeke, J.; Penninckx, W.; Heyden, Y.V.; Vankeerberghen, P.; Massart, D.L.; Anal. Chem. 1995, 67, 4491.
• 32. Vogel, A. I.; Textbook of Quantitative Chemical Analysis, Pearson education (Singapore), Indian branch: New Delhi, 2002, p. 777 and 778

Publication Dates

• Publication in this collection
  09 Nov 2005
• Date of issue
  Oct 2005

History

• Accepted
  03 Aug 2005
• Received
  06 Jan 2005