Acessibilidade / Reportar erro

A Contribution to the estimation of binary halide and pseudo-halide equilibrium constants using a linear extrapolation methodology

Abstracts

The molar single ion activity coefficient (yF) of fluoride ions was determined at 25 °C and ionic strengths between 0.100 and 3.00 mol L-1 NaClO4 using an ion-selective electrode. The activity coefficient dependency on ionic strength was determined to be ΦF = log yF = 0.2315I - 0.041I². The function ΦF(I), combined with functions obtained in previous work for copper (ΦCu) and hydrogen (ΦH), allowed us to make the estimation of the stoichiometric and thermodynamic protonation constants of some halides and pseudo-halides as well as the formation constants of some pseudo-halides and fluoride 1:1 bivalent cation complexes. The calculation procedure proposed in this paper is consistent with critically-selected experimental data. It was demonstrated that it is possible to use ΦF(I) for predicting the thermodynamic equilibrium parameters independently of Pearson's hardness of acids and bases.

thermodynamic activity; ion-selective electrode analysis; stability constants


O coeficiente de atividade molar individual do íon fluoreto (yF) foi determinado a 25° C para valores de força iônica entre 0,100 and 3,00 mol L-1 (NaClO4) usando-se um eletrodo íon-seletivo. A dependência do coeficiente de atividade com a força iônica é explicada pela equação ΦF = log yF = 0,2315I - 0,041I². A função ΦF(I), foi associada a outras funções estimadas em trabalhos anteriores, por exemplo,ΦCu(I) para cobre, e ΦH(I) para íon hidrogênio, possibilitando a estimativa de constantes de estabilidade estequiométricas e termodinâmicas tanto para equilíbrios de protonação de alguns haletos e pseudo-haletos como para as constantes de formação de complexos 1:1 de metais bivalentes com fluoreto e pseudo-haletos. O procedimento de cálculo proposto é consistente com dados experimentais criticamente selecionados da literatura. Verificou-se que é possível usar ΦF(I) na previsão de parâmetros de equilíbrio termodinâmicos independentemente do caráter HSAB de Pearson .


ARTICLE

A Contribution to the estimation of binary halide and pseudo-halide equilibrium constants using a linear extrapolation methodology

Astréa F. de S. SilvaI, * * e-mail: astrea@umc.br ; Manuel M. OrtegaII, # # In memoriam ; Cristo B. MeliosIII; Leonardo PezzaIII; Mercedes de MoraesIII; Mário Alberto TenanIV; André F. OliveiraI

INúcleo de Ciências Ambientais, Universidade de Mogi das Cruzes, UMC, Av. Cândido Xavier de Almeida Souza, 200, Centro Cívico, 08780-911 Mogi das Cruzes-SP, Brazil

IIDepartamento de Química, UFMA, 65085-580 São Luís-MA, Brazil

III Instituto de Química, UNESP, 1480-970 Araraquara-SP, Brazil

IVInstituto de Física Gleb Wataghin, Universidade Estadual de Campinas-UNICAMP, 13083-970 Campinas-SP, Brazil

ABSTRACT

The molar single ion activity coefficient (yF) of fluoride ions was determined at 25 °C and ionic strengths between 0.100 and 3.00 mol L-1 NaClO4 using an ion-selective electrode. The activity coefficient dependency on ionic strength was determined to be ΦF = log yF = 0.2315I - 0.041I2. The function ΦF(I), combined with functions obtained in previous work for copper (ΦCu) and hydrogen (ΦH), allowed us to make the estimation of the stoichiometric and thermodynamic protonation constants of some halides and pseudo-halides as well as the formation constants of some pseudo-halides and fluoride 1:1 bivalent cation complexes. The calculation procedure proposed in this paper is consistent with critically-selected experimental data. It was demonstrated that it is possible to use ΦF(I) for predicting the thermodynamic equilibrium parameters independently of Pearson's hardness of acids and bases.

Keywords: thermodynamic activity, ion-selective electrode analysis, stability constants

RESUMO

O coeficiente de atividade molar individual do íon fluoreto (yF) foi determinado a 25° C para valores de força iônica entre 0,100 and 3,00 mol L-1 (NaClO4) usando-se um eletrodo íon-seletivo.

A dependência do coeficiente de atividade com a força iônica é explicada pela equação ΦF = log yF = 0,2315I - 0,041I2. A função ΦF(I), foi associada a outras funções estimadas em trabalhos anteriores, por exemplo,ΦCu(I) para cobre, e ΦH(I) para íon hidrogênio, possibilitando a estimativa de constantes de estabilidade estequiométricas e termodinâmicas tanto para equilíbrios de protonação de alguns haletos e pseudo-haletos como para as constantes de formação de complexos 1:1 de metais bivalentes com fluoreto e pseudo-haletos. O procedimento de cálculo proposto é consistente com dados experimentais criticamente selecionados da literatura. Verificou-se que é possível usar ΦF(I) na previsão de parâmetros de equilíbrio termodinâmicos independentemente do caráter HSAB de Pearson .

Introduction

The stoichiometric and thermodynamic constants for both protonation and complexation equilibria are parameters of fundamental importance. The development of reliable empirical methods for the estimations and/or evaluations of these parameters is equally relevant.1-6 Furthermore, the most common procedures for finding the thermodynamic values for protonation or complexation equilibria are based on graphical extrapolations to zero ionic strength of stoichiometric values of log KH (or log β)

or on complicated functions involving extended forms of the Debye-Hückel or Pitzer equations.5,7-9 The existing procedures are not reliable except in a few favorable cases.5,7 In some cases, the deviations obtained via common extrapolation methods can be as great as 400%,8 however, the difficulties raised by the non-linear methodologies can be avoided by considering linear relationships,1-3 as explained below.

The linear methodology

The methodology is based on the following relation, which is valid for the metal-ligand formation equilibrium:

where M is a divalent metallic ion, L is a monovalent anionic ligand, ML is the first complex species formed, ΦM, ΦL and ΦML represent the functions of the single molar activity coefficients for the species, and βT and β are the thermodynamic and stoichiometric formation constants of ML at a given ionic strength. To simplify the notation, charges were omitted and only the formation of a 1:1 metal-ligand was considered.

The three terms on the left side of Eq. (1) can be calculated as functions of the ionic strength I of the medium. Furthermore, the values of log β can be found in the literature,12 whereas those for ΦM and ΦL can be calculated by taking into account the following empirical relation:10

where i represents M or L, yi is the molar activity coefficient of species i, and ai, bi, ci... are coefficients to be determined by considering extra-thermodynamic arguments.2,3 It should be noted that the necessity of getting information about the single-ion activities is not a problem, as recognized by Wilczek-Vera & Vera,11 since the activity and hence the activity coefficient of a single ion can be calculated from ion-selective electrode measurements.

Since the sum Y of the three terms on the left side of Eq. (1) can be found as a function of I, the next step in the methodology consists of looking for a non-negative integer number n for which a plot of Y versus In/2 becomes linear (in practice, n = 1 or 2 has been sufficient). From this linear fitting, it is possible to empirically determine the right side of Eq. (1); namely, the difference log βT - ΦML.

In conclusion, the functions Φi(I) = log yi, together with a sufficient number of stoichiometric (log β, I) or (log KH, I) pairs of values critically selected from the literature,12 allow us to find linear relations that provide a reliable extrapolation of the thermodynamic values log βT (or log KHT), as well as the interconversion of stoichiometric values of log β (or log KH) at different ionic strengths.

Estimation of Φi(I) with potentiometric measurements

Potentiometric measurements using metal or ligand ion-selective electrodes can be carried out in an inert electrolyte at constant ionic strength and temperature. The electromotive force of the potentiometric cell obeys the following simplified equation:

where i represents an ion or a neutral substance, [i] is the molar concentration of species i, S is a constant, and Ei0' is the sum of all constant terms that contribute to the total measured electromotive force (reference electrode, liquid junction and indicator electrode potentials). The constant sum term can be expressed in terms of the activity coefficient yi as:

where (Ei0')0 is the infinite dilution limit value of Ei0'.

Equation (3) shows that E0'i and S can be obtained graphically from the measured values of an E versus log [i] plot. From Eqs. (2) and (4), we obtain

The experimental determination of sufficient pairs of values (I, Ei0') makes it possible to estimate the parameter (Ei0')0 and the empirical coefficients ai, bi, ci... from a polynomial fitting. The function Φi = log yi may then be estimated.

Experimental

Materials and Solutions

Analytical-grade reagents were used in all experiments. A stock solution of sodium perchlorate was standardized by evaporation, drying, and constant weighing at 120 °C. The solution pH was measured with a glass electrode and varied between 6.80 and 7.00. The stock solution of perchloric acid was standardized with sodium carbonate. The sodium fluoride solution was prepared in a polyethylene volumetric flask, without previous reagent purification. All of the solutions were prepared with Milli-Q water.

Instruments

The potentiometric measurements were performed with a precision of ca. 0.1 mV using an Orion 940 potentiometer. The temperature was kept at 25.0 ± 0.1 °C using a Tecnal Scientific Appliances cryostat connected to a 35 mL titration cell with a thermostatization jacket. The internal glass surface of the titration cell was totally covered with a layer of paraffin to avoid fluoride attack. Metrohm E274 piston burettes (precision of 0.01 mL) and automatic pipettes of 0.100 ± 0.001 mL and 0.500 ± 0.002 mL were used. The ionic strength was adjusted with NaClO4 over the 0.1-3.0 mol L-1 range. An Orion 94-04 fluoride ion-selective electrode and an Orion 90-01 single junction Ag/AgCl reference electrode adequate for use in fluoride media were employed.

Potentiometric Cell

The potentiometric cell used for the NaF-NaClO4 systems is

Procedure

Solutions of 0.090 mol L-1 NaF were prepared in 100.0 mL polyurethane volumetric flasks for each ionic strength. Using a piston burette Methrom E274, the necessary volumes of a 5.223 mol L-1 NaClO4 solution and water were added to adjust the ionic strength of the NaF solution to the desired value.

The indicator and reference electrodes were placed in a cell containing 10.00 mL of NaClO4 at the given ionic strength. After stirring the NaClO4 solution for 10 min, aliquots (0.5 or 0.1 mL) of the 0.090 mol L-1 NaF solution were added. The potential value was registered after 40 s, which represents the time recommended by the manufacturer.

When not in use, the indicator electrode was kept in a 10-3 mol L-1 solution of NaF. The single junction reference electrode was kept in a NaClO4 solution at the ionic strength of the next group of measurements to be carried out.

Results and Discussion

Estimate of the fluoride ion activity coefficient dependency on the ionic strength of the medium

The junction potential Ej for the NaF-NaClO4 system was evaluated with the help of the Henderson equation13 and molar ionic conductivity data from the literature.14 The resulting values obtained for Ej were small enough to be neglected. The parameters EF0' and S were determined by simple linear regression.15 The correlation coefficient r was greater than 0.999, in all cases. A variation of ca. 18 mV in the E0' values and an average value of 59.7 mV/decade for S were obtained in the interval of ionic strength considered (Electronic Supplementary Information).

The best fit1-3,16 obtained for the Eo' versus I curve was:

with a correlation coefficient of 0.8897 and a standard deviation of 2.34. Considering the average experimental value of S (59.7 ± 1.4 mV/decade), it can be verified that the dependency of yF on the ionic strength of the NaF-NaClO4 system at 25.0 ± 0.1 °C is given by:

The influence of the electrolyte on the molar activity coefficient of F- is highly significant. These results indicate that structural effects of the solvent as well as ion-ion and ion-solvent interactions (hydration) should be taken into account to produce a realistic description of these systems. The sodium ion produces a weak-ordering effect on the structure of water. In contrast, the perchlorate ion plays a significant role in promoting a disordering effect on the water structure. The significant variations in the activity coefficients of fluoride in the sodium perchlorate media due to an increase in the ionic strength can be at least partially justified by the perchlorate ion disordering effect. Similar behavior was observed for H+, copper(II), cadmium(II), and lead(II) in a sodium perchlorate medium.1 An exception was the acetate ion, in which case no significant change was observed probably due to the fact that the ordering effect compensates that caused by the perchlorate ion.1

Estimates of the thermodynamic equilibrium constants for some equilibria in aqueous solutions

The function ΦF(I) determined in the present paper was used in connection with the functions ΦCu(I), ΦCd(I), ΦPb(I) and ΦH(I) obtained by Pezza and co-workers1-3 for the same conditions of temperature, ionic strength and ionic medium. The proposed methodology was applied for the estimation of the thermodynamic constants for the mono-protonation (log KHT) of halides or pseudo-halides (HX species), as well as the formation of (1:1) bivalent metal complexes (log βT) with halides (MF+) or pseudo-halides (MX+ species).

The corresponding linear relations for the calculation of the thermodynamic constants for the HX, MF+ and MX+ systems were established from sufficient pairs of stoichiometric values (log KH, I) or (log β, I) critically selected from the literature.12

The empirical coefficients a and b in equation 2 are listed in Tables 1-3 for the HX, MF+ and MX+ systems. Also listed are the experimental conditions and the corresponding equations established.

   

The estimated values of log KHT and log βT (Tables 2 and 3) are consistent with the experimental data critically selected in the literature,12 showing the comprehensiveness of the proposed methodology in predicting the thermodynamic constants. It was also verified that it is possible to use ΦF(I) in predicting log βT for complexes of other halides and pseudo-halides (electronic supplementary information), independently of the hard and soft acids/bases classification.17

Other Successful Applications of the Linear Methodology

Figure 1 compares the plots of log β and log β - ΦCu - ΦF as functions of the ionic strength I for the complexes PbBr+ and SnCl+. In contrast to the linear extrapolation of log β - ΦCu - ΦF to zero ionic strength, the degree of uncertainty in the non-linear extrapolation of log β is very high. The same behavior was observed in the cases of CoF+, MgF+, CoCl+, NiCl+, NiN3+, PbCl+ and PbNCS+. These cases are clear examples of the inherent advantage of the linear methodology in providing reliable estimations of thermodynamic constants via extrapolation.


In some cases, it can be observed that although one point deviates noticeably from the linear relation (e.g. Fig 2), the remaining points lead to stability constant values that agree with those reported in the literature.12 These results suggest further investigation of these systems, since the values of log β for the deviant points could probably be in error.


Another striking example of the effectiveness of the linear extrapolation is presented by the PbNCS+ system (see Fig. 3). The linear extrapolation predicts for the thermodynamic constant a value of 0.69 with an uncertainty of ca. 0.07 (electronic supplementary information). In contrast, a non-linear fitting hardly leads to a reliable thermodynamic value based on the three stoichiometric values available in the literature.12


The linear methodology was also applied to the calculation of the thermodynamic stability constants of the CoF+, MnF+, PbF+, PbNCS+, CdF+, MnF+, CdN3+, NiCl+, NiN3+and ZnN3+ systems, for which the corresponding values have not been reported in the literature.12

Another very interesting finding is that with just the two values of log β available for the CaF+ and HgN3+ systems, it was possible to obtain thermodynamic values compatible with those found in the literature. Moreover, the parameters ΦCu and ΦF were used successfully to correlate stoichiometric constants determined at ionic strengths outside the experimental range considered in this work, namely 0.05 or 4.00 mol L-1, for the CuF+, UO2F+, CdCl+, PbBr+, PbCl+, PbNCS+, SnBr+, SnCl+, ZnNCS+ and CuN3+ systems.

A useful feature of this methodology is that its effectiveness in the prediction of stability constants is not limited to systems for which the parameter ΦMetal is available. Good estimates were obtained for several complexes of other divalent metallic ions besides Cu2+; namely, Fe2+, Co2+, Ni2+, Zn2+, Be2+, Ca2+, Mn2+, Sn2+, Pb2+, Cd2+, and Hg2+. This provides some support for the consideration that similar ions should present similar equilibrium parameters.1-4 It is worth emphasizing that the function ΦF associated with the fluoride ion provided good results for the protonation and stability constants for various metal complexes with halides such as Cl-, Br-, and I-, and pseudo-halides such as CN-, SCN-, N3-, NO3- and NO2- (see Tables 1-3).

Application of the methodology in speciation of some MX+ soluble components in seawater

The thermodynamic stability constants (log βT) and the empirical coefficients b determined for some MX+ species in NaClO4 media were used to calculate log β by considering I = 0.7 mol L-1 in the following equation:

where ΦM = ΦCu and ΦX = ΦF . As shown in Table 3, the results are in good agreement with those critically selected by Martell18 for the MX+ species in seawater (supporting electrolyte NaCl at I = 0.7 mol L-1 and T = 25 °C). The exceptions are the results for NiF+ and NiCl+. Although different supporting electrolytes were considered (NaClO4 in the present work and NaCl from Martell), the very good agreement obtained for the majority of cases (thirteen species) suggests that the values of the stoichiometric constants given by Martell18 for the two exceptional cases (NiF+ and NiCl+) should be reviewed.

CONCLUSIONS

The possibility of using ΦF to predict log βT for complexes of other halides and pseudo-halides, independently of the classification of the hard and soft acids and bases, has been clearly demonstrated. This result is certainly one of the most significant contributions of this work.

Furthermore, the analysis in this paper extends the usefulness of the methodology proposed previously.2 As noted by Pezza et al.,2 it is possible to use ΦCu to predict the equilibrium parameters related to other metallic ions such as Pb and Cd. In this investigation, the methodology has been successfully applied to several other metallic ions.

The satisfactory results obtained in the speciation of some components of seawater for I = 0.7 mol L-1 show that this methodology can contribute to the determination of parameters of essential importance in the study and speciation of chemical systems such as biological fluids, soils, and natural and supply waters.

In conclusion, the variety of cases analyzed in this paper form a sound basis for the effectiveness of the linear methodology in providing reliable estimations of equilibrium constants for several binary systems in aqueous media.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

The authors are indebted to the Brazilian Foundations CNPq, CAPES, FAPESP and FAEP/UMC.

Suplemmentary Information

Suplemmentary data are available free of charge at http://jbcs.sbq.org.br, as pdf file.

References

1. Pezza, L.; Molina, M.; Moraes, M. de; Melios, C. B.; Tognolli, J. O.; Talanta 1996, 43 , 1689.

2. Pezza, L.; Molina, M.; Moraes, M. de; Melios, C. B.; Gomes, H. M.; Tognolli, J. O; Talanta 1996, 43, 1697.

3. Pezza, L.; Molina, M.; Moraes, M. de; Melios, C. B.; Tognolli, J. O.; Int. J. Environ. Anal. Chem. 1997, 68, 295.

4. Anderegg, G.; Kholeif, S.; Talanta 1994, 41, 1507.

5. Partanen, J. I.; Juusola, P. M.; Vahteristo, K. P.; Mendonça, A. J. G.; J. Solution Chem. 2007, 36, 39.

6. Hancock, R. D.; Analyst 1997,122, 51R.

7. Rossotti, F.J.; Rossotti, H.; The Determination of Stability Constants, McGraw Hill: New York, 1961.

8. Beck, T.; Nagypál, I.; Chemistry of Complex Equilibria, Wiley: New York, 1990. ; Grenthe, I.; Wanner, H.; TB-52 Guidelines for the Extrapolation to Zero Ionic, OECD Nuclear Energy Agency: Issy-les-Moulineaux, 2000.

9. Hartley, F.R.; Burguess, C., Alcock, R.; Solution Equilibria, Wiley: New York, 1980.

10. Gordon, J. E.; The Organic Chemistry of Electrolyte Solutions; Wiley: New York, 1975.

11. Wilczek-Vera, G.; Vera, J.H.; Fluid Phase Equilibr. 2005, 236, 96. ; Rodil, E.; Vera, J. H.; Fluid Phase Equilibr. 2003, 205, 115; Zhuo, Z. , Dong, W., Wang, W. , Wang; Fluid Phase Equilibr. 2008, 274, 80.

12. Martell, A.E.; Smith, R.M.; Critical Stability Constants Vols.3-6, Plenum: New York, 1976, 1977, 1982, 1989.

13. Henderson, P.; Z. Phys. Chem. 1907, 59, 118 apud Harris, D.C.; Quantitative Chemical Analysis, 2nd ed., W.H. Freeman & Co.: New York,1992.

14. Parsons, R.; Handbook Electrochemical Constants, Butterworths: London, 1959.

15. Oliveira, A.F.; Silva, A. F. S.; Molina, M.; Abstracts of the XI CIBAE-IX SIBEE, Águas de Lindóia, Brasil, 1994.

16. Microcal Software; Microcal Origin, Northampton, USA, 1994.

17. Huheey, J.E.; Inorganic Chemistry - Principles of Structure and Reactivity, 3rd ed., Harper & Row: New York, 1983. ; Reed, J. L.; Inorg. Chem. 2008, 47, 5591.

18. Martell, A.E.; Motekaitis, R.J.; Smith, R.M. In Environmental Inorganic Chemistry; Ingolic, K.J.; Martell, A.E., eds., Verlag Chemie: Florida, 1985.

19. Brown, P.; Sylva, J.; J. Chem. Res. 1987, S , 4; Brown, P.; Sylva, J.; J. Chem. Res. 1987, M, 110.

Received: June 11, 2009

Web Release Date: October 23, 2009

FAPESP helped in meeting the publication costs of this article.

Supplementary Information

  • 1. Pezza, L.; Molina, M.; Moraes, M. de; Melios, C. B.; Tognolli, J. O.; Talanta 1996, 43 , 1689.
  • 2. Pezza, L.; Molina, M.; Moraes, M. de; Melios, C. B.; Gomes, H. M.; Tognolli, J. O; Talanta 1996, 43, 1697.
  • 3. Pezza, L.; Molina, M.; Moraes, M. de; Melios, C. B.; Tognolli, J. O.; Int. J. Environ. Anal. Chem. 1997, 68, 295.
  • 4. Anderegg, G.; Kholeif, S.; Talanta 1994, 41, 1507.
  • 5. Partanen, J. I.; Juusola, P. M.; Vahteristo, K. P.; Mendonça, A. J. G.; J. Solution Chem. 2007, 36, 39.
  • 6. Hancock, R. D.; Analyst 1997,122, 51R.
  • 7. Rossotti, F.J.; Rossotti, H.; The Determination of Stability Constants, McGraw Hill: New York, 1961.
  • 8. Beck, T.; Nagypál, I.; Chemistry of Complex Equilibria, Wiley: New York, 1990.
  • ; Grenthe, I.; Wanner, H.; TB-52 Guidelines for the Extrapolation to Zero Ionic, OECD Nuclear Energy Agency: Issy-les-Moulineaux, 2000.
  • 9. Hartley, F.R.; Burguess, C., Alcock, R.; Solution Equilibria, Wiley: New York, 1980.
  • 10. Gordon, J. E.; The Organic Chemistry of Electrolyte Solutions; Wiley: New York, 1975.
  • 11. Wilczek-Vera, G.; Vera, J.H.; Fluid Phase Equilibr. 2005, 236, 96.
  • ; Rodil, E.; Vera, J. H.; Fluid Phase Equilibr. 2003, 205, 115;
  • Zhuo, Z. , Dong, W., Wang, W. , Wang; Fluid Phase Equilibr. 2008, 274, 80.
  • 12. Martell, A.E.; Smith, R.M.; Critical Stability Constants Vols.3-6, Plenum: New York, 1976, 1977, 1982, 1989.
  • 13. Henderson, P.; Z. Phys. Chem. 1907, 59, 118 apud Harris, D.C.; Quantitative Chemical Analysis, 2nd ed., W.H. Freeman & Co.: New York,1992.
  • 14. Parsons, R.; Handbook Electrochemical Constants, Butterworths: London, 1959.
  • 15. Oliveira, A.F.; Silva, A. F. S.; Molina, M.; Abstracts of the XI CIBAE-IX SIBEE, Águas de Lindóia, Brasil, 1994.
  • 16. Microcal Software; Microcal Origin, Northampton, USA, 1994.
  • 17. Huheey, J.E.; Inorganic Chemistry - Principles of Structure and Reactivity, 3rd ed., Harper & Row: New York, 1983.
  • ; Reed, J. L.; Inorg. Chem. 2008, 47, 5591.
  • 18. Martell, A.E.; Motekaitis, R.J.; Smith, R.M. In Environmental Inorganic Chemistry; Ingolic, K.J.; Martell, A.E., eds., Verlag Chemie: Florida, 1985.
  • 19. Brown, P.; Sylva, J.; J. Chem. Res. 1987, S , 4;
  • Brown, P.; Sylva, J.; J. Chem. Res. 1987, M, 110.
  •  
  • *
    e-mail:
  • #
    In memoriam
  • Publication Dates

    • Publication in this collection
      18 Feb 2010
    • Date of issue
      2010

    History

    • Received
      11 June 2009
    • Accepted
      23 Oct 2009
    Sociedade Brasileira de Química Instituto de Química - UNICAMP, Caixa Postal 6154, 13083-970 Campinas SP - Brazil, Tel./FAX.: +55 19 3521-3151 - São Paulo - SP - Brazil
    E-mail: office@jbcs.sbq.org.br