Acessibilidade / Reportar erro

Monitoring of β-blockers ozone degradation via electrospray ionization mass spectrometry

Abstracts

The structures of intermediate products of ozone degradation of different pharmaceutical compounds have been studied. Under the conditions employed, complete ozone degradation of nadolol was achieved after 100 min. The degradation products obtained in aqueous solution were characterized by electrospray ionization mass (and tandem mass) spectrometry (ESI-MS and ESI-MS/MS). The proposed mechanism for degradation, ozone attacks at the aniline amino group giving rise to nitro compounds and further degradation occurs via a series of oxidative processes. Continuous online monitoring by ESI-MS(/MS) with high accuracy mass measurements showed that ozone degradation of atenolol (ATE) and acebutolol (ACE) occurs via mechanisms similar to that of nadolol

ozonation; degradation; ESI-MS; pharmaceutical compounds; reaction mechanism


As estruturas dos produtos de degradação mediada por ozônio de diferentes compostos farmacêuticos foram estudadas. Uma completa degradação do nadolol foi observada nas condições empregadas após 100 min. Os produtos de degradação obtidos nas soluções aquosas foram caracterizados por espectrometria de massas com ionização por electrospray (ESI-MS e ESI-MS/MS). O mecanismo proposto para a degradação consiste inicialmente do ataque de ozônio ao grupo amino da anilina formando nitro compostos, seguida de uma série de processos oxidativos. Monitoramento por ESI-MS(/MS) mostrou que a degradação de atenolol (ATE) e acebutolol (ACE) por ozônio ocorrem via um mecanismo similar ao do nadolol


ARTICLE

Monitoring of β -blockers ozone degradation via electrospray ionization mass spectrometry

Cristina QuispeI,IV; Fabiane M. NachtigallII; Maria Francesca R. FonsecaII; Rosana M. AlbericiII; Luis AstudilloIII; Jorge VillaseñorI; Marcos N. EberlinII; Leonardo S. Santos * e-mail: lssantos@utalca.cl IV,* * e-mail: lssantos@utalca.cl

ILaboratory of Physical Chemistry, Instituto de Química de Recursos Naturales, Talca University, PO Box 747, Talca, Chile

IIThoMSon Mass Spectrometry Laboratory, Institute of Chemistry, University of Campinas, 13083-970 Campinas-SP, Brazil

IIILaboratory of Organic Synthesis, Talca University, PO Box 747, Talca, Chile

IVLaboratory of Asymmetric Synthesis, Talca University, PO Box 747, Talca, Chile

ABSTRACT

The structures of intermediate products of ozone degradation of different pharmaceutical compounds have been studied. Under the conditions employed, complete ozone degradation of nadolol was achieved after 100 min. The degradation products obtained in aqueous solution were characterized by electrospray ionization mass (and tandem mass) spectrometry (ESI-MS and ESI-MS/MS). The proposed mechanism for degradation, ozone attacks at the aniline amino group giving rise to nitro compounds and further degradation occurs via a series of oxidative processes. Continuous online monitoring by ESI-MS(/MS) with high accuracy mass measurements showed that ozone degradation of atenolol (ATE) and acebutolol (ACE) occurs via mechanisms similar to that of nadolol.

Keywords: ozonation, degradation, ESI-MS, pharmaceutical compounds, reaction mechanism

RESUMO

As estruturas dos produtos de degradação mediada por ozônio de diferentes compostos farmacêuticos foram estudadas. Uma completa degradação do nadolol foi observada nas condições empregadas após 100 min. Os produtos de degradação obtidos nas soluções aquosas foram caracterizados por espectrometria de massas com ionização por electrospray (ESI-MS e ESI-MS/MS). O mecanismo proposto para a degradação consiste inicialmente do ataque de ozônio ao grupo amino da anilina formando nitro compostos, seguida de uma série de processos oxidativos. Monitoramento por ESI-MS(/MS) mostrou que a degradação de atenolol (ATE) e acebutolol (ACE) por ozônio ocorrem via um mecanismo similar ao do nadolol.

Introduction

Concerns about the prejudicial effects to life of accumulation of pharmaceuticals in the environment has greatly increased in recent years.1,2 But such accumulation is governed mainly by the environmental bio- and photo-transformation3 and the speed and nature of the natural degradation of these potentially harmful contaminants.4,5 The photolytic degradation of chemicals in the environment may occur via direct sunlight absorption or by reactions with strong oxidizing species such as hydroxyl radicals and singlet oxygen.

Pharmaceuticals enter the aquatic environment after its ingestion by humans and other animals and subsequent excretion, either in their intact forms or as metabolites.6 Wastewater treatment is applied worldwide but pharmaceuticals may not be efficiently removed,3,7 and these pharmaceutical residues and degradation products can be downloaded directly into aquatic environments. Several studies have stated that the long-term risk to humans from any single pharmaceutical at sub-µg L-1 levels is negligible, but the toxicological implications of chronic exposure to trace contaminants is still unclear.8,9

Ozonation is an advanced oxidation process widely used in many wastewater treatment plants for the oxidation of organic contaminants and disinfection. Ozone, compared to other most common oxidizing reagents such as H2O2 or chlorine, is more efficient in pollutant degradation and less harmful to most living organisms.10 In water, ozone can oxidize contaminants via direct selective reactions11 such as ozone addition to double bonds or the initiation of chain radical reactions by the production of free hydroxy radicals (equations 1- 4). Hydroxy radicals are generated from ozone decomposition, which is catalyzed by the presence of hydroxyl anions or by traces of other substances, such as transition metal cations.

The decomposition of ozone in aqueous solutions is known to proceed via the chain reactions shown in equations 1- 4.12 Ozone therefore indirectly attacks organic compounds since such reactions are faster than direct O3 attack. In previous studies,13,14 we described the O3 interaction with pharmaceutical compound nadolol (anti-hypertensive). In this study, we report the characterization via electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (ESI-MS)15,16 of the oxidation intermediates and products of degradation of nadolol generated during O3 oxidation. Furthermore, the O3 degradation of two other β-blockers compounds atenolol and acebutolol was also studied.

ESI-MS (and its tandem version ESI-MS/MS) has been used extensively to monitor the composition and degradation of organic compounds in the environment.17,18 ESI-MS(/MS) with its unique characteristics has become a major technique to elucidate reaction mechanism especially in aqueous solutions via the detection and identification of reactants, products, and intermediates,19,20 even the short-lived ones that occur at very low concentrations.21,22

Gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) has often been the technique of choice for reaction screening and product elucidation.23 However, GC-MS is an offline technique that demands extraction and sometimes derivatization pre-steps, transient, most polar, or relatively unstable compounds may be missed. We have then performed ESI-MS(/MS) monitoring of the O3 advanced oxidation of nadolol, atenolol and acebutolol in water to search for all intermediates and products of this environmentally important process. These products are the ones most likely to be found in treated wastewaters. We also used high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), ultraviolet spectroscopy (UV), and total organic carbon (TOC) analyses to collect additional data on substrate degradation rates and mineralization and to investigate the presence of residual organic compounds in the aqueous solutions.24

Experimental

Chemicals

Nadolol (NAD), atenolol (ATE) and acebutolol (ACE) were purchased from Sigma. All the solvents were of HPLC grade and purchased from Merck and used without purification. Doubly distilled water was used to prepare all the solutions in the experiments. Ozone was generated using a laboratory ozone generation (OZOCAV) ozonizer fed with air/oxygen.

Degradation procedures

The ozonation reactions were performed in a batch glass reactor thermostated at 25 ºC. The reactor was charged with 100 mL of the drug aqueous solutions (1.6 × 10-4 mol L-1) and fed with 1.2 × 10-4 mol L-1 of ozone at a constant flow of 46 ± 1 mL min-1. The ozone concentration was monitored measuring the absorbance at 254 nm, using the molar extinction coefficient of ozone of 2900 L mol-1 cm-1. Aliquots (1.0 mL) were taken at several reaction times and promptly analyzed by ESI-MS(/MS) and HPLC. All samples were protected from light and refrigerated at 4 ºC prior to analyses.

Analytic methods

Drugs concentrations were monitored using a Perkin Elmer Series 200 chromatograph HPLC system equipped with a UV-Vis detector. A Merck-Chromolith Performance RP-18 column (4.6 mm × 100 mm) was used with H2O:MeOH (70:30, v/v) mobile phase at a flow rate of 0.6 mL min-1. Water was previously acidified to pH 3 using aqueous solution of HCl. Organic acids were quantified with a transgenomic ORH-801 column (6.5 mm × 300 mm) using 5.0 × 10-3 mol L-1 sulphuric acid as mobile phase at a flow rate of 0.8 mL min-1.

Ultraviolet (UV) absorbance measurements were performed using a HP 8453 (Agilent) spectrophotometer equipped with a quartz cell with a 1.0 cm path length. Absorbances were measured with baseline correction, scan rate of 200-600 nm, and integrate time of 0.5 s and intervals of 1 nm.

Total organic carbon (TOC) experiments were carried out in a TOC 5000A (Shimadzu) instrument at 680 ºC using a platinum catalyst.

ESI-MS(/MS) data were collected using a high resolution hybrid quadrupole (Q) and orthogonal time-of-flight (TOF) mass spectrometer (Q-Tof, Micromass UK) with constant nebulizer temperature of 50 ºC. The ESI source and the mass spectrometer were operated in the positive ion mode, and the cone and extractor potentials were set to 40 and 10 V, respectively, with a scan range of m/z 50-1000. Samples were infused into the ESI source at flow rates of ca 15 µL min-1 via a microsyringe pump. ESI-MS/MS experiments were carried out by selection of a specific ion in Q1 and by performing its collision-induced dissociation (CID) with argon in the collision chamber. The product ions MS analysis was accomplished with the high-resolution (ca. 5.000) and high accuracy (ca. 10 ppm) orthogonal TOF analyzer.

Results and Discussion

Degradation of nadolol

Our investigation began with HPLC monitoring for the O3 degradation of nadolol (NAD) in an aqueous solution at a concentration of 1.6 × 10-4 mol L-1 at pH 3 or 9, with O3 concentration at 1.2 × 10-4 mol L-1 (Figure 1). Regardless the pH (acidic or basic), more than 90% of NAD was found to be degraded after 60 min at similar rates. TOC analyses were then performed to evaluate the mineralization extent, which was found to be only 20% according to TOC removal. This result suggests that NAD was completely consumed after 60 min of O3 degradation, but desirable mineralization to CO2, H2O and NH3 was far for completion. UV monitoring of O3 degradation (Figure 2) also indicated complete NAD consumption, but little information is provided of the nature of the degradation products. The UV spectra of Figure 2i show three characteristic absorption bands of nadolol at 203, 217 and 277 nm. After O3 treatment, the UV spectra show that intensities of these absorption bands were greatly reduced, suggesting nadolol was degraded, but not totally mineralized with persistent organic intermediates.



ESI-MS(/MS) monitoring

Figure 3 displays representative ESI(+) mass spectra of nadolol aqueous solution (pH 9) monitored after 60, 100 and 160 min from ozone treatment. Similar spectra (not shown) were acquired when using solutions at pH 3. The spectra at zero irradiation time (Figure 3a) detected, as expected, an intense ion of m/z 310 corresponding to protonated NAD. The ESI-MS/MS (Figure 4a) for collision induced dissociation of protonated NAD of m/z 310 shows a series of major and structurally diagnostic fragment ions arising from the loss of isobutene (m/z 254), H2O plus isobutene (m/z 236), 2 × H2O plus isobutene (m/z 218) and NH3 plus 2 × H2O and isobutene (m/z 201).


 







 




The degradation process was monitored by intervals of 20 min during 160 min of reaction. Illustrative spectra are displayed in Figure 3. The degradation of nadolol of m/z 310 was clearly perceived as well as the formation of organic intermediates. After 60 min of ozonation (Figure 3b), three additional and increasingly abundant ions of m/z 92, 148 and 236 were detected. The ion of m/z 148 (Figure 3d), which indicates the loss of a subunit of 161 Da (from nadolol of 309 Da), was characterized as the protonated form of dihydroxylamine 2 (Figure 5). Further degradation of 2 afforded hydroxylamine [3 + H]+ by loss of isobutene as noted through the ion of m/z 92, as depicted in Figure 3d.


The ion of m/z 236 (Figure 3d) was likely formed by aromatic ring opening, which produced a series of degradation products detected as the ions of m/z 378, 342 and 376. Furthermore, ESI-MS was able to gently and efficiently fish directly from the solution to the gas phase for MS analysis also an increasingly abundant ion of m/z 236. This ion was characterized as aminotriol 9 (Figure 5). Figure 4c shows the ESI-MS/MS spectra of intermediate [9 + H]+ that dissociated by loss of isobutene (C4H8) producing the fragment ion of m/z 180. That loss is indicative of tert-butyl group in the molecule, as observed in Figure 4. Another interesting fragmentation pathway was observed for [9 + H]+ by loss of C4H8O2, which structure could be realized as 2-hydroxytetrahydrofuran.

Two major mechanisms can be considered for O3 treatment. The first one assumes O3 addition to double bonds, whereas the second considers indirect reaction in water via hydroxyl radicals (equations 1-4). Formation of lower and higher masses intermediates was observed. Considering the lower mass compounds, Figure 5 presents a proposed route of degradation based on the ESI-MS(/MS) data, whereas Figure 6 presents proposed pathways leading to the higher mass products. HPLC analyses with standards corroborated unequivocally the structure of several structures proposed for the intermediates detected and characterized by ESI-MS(/MS). Among them are oxalic acid, formic acid and glyoxylic acid, which are known as recalcitrant compounds very resistant to further degradations.13 The resistance for this class of compounds is due to the lack of C-H bonds, and this may explaining why oxalic acid was less susceptible to OH· radicals attack which are produced mainly at high pH from O3. Thus, although the parent NAD was totally consumed by O3 treatment at different pH in a similar reaction rates, the intermediates observed in solution at pH 3 or 9 were different.


Degradation of atenolol

The degradation of atenolol (ATE) by O3 was monitored at either pH 3 or 9. Figure 2 shows UV spectra of the degradation of atenolol (1.9 ×10-4 mol L-1) by ozone at pH 3. Similar results (not shown) were obtained at pH 9. Three characteristic absorption bands of atenolol at seen at 200, 223 and 274 nm. TOC analyses indicated only 15% of mineralization. These results suggested, as for NAD, that the mineralization leading to CO2, H2O and NH3 was mostly incomplete.

Figure 7 displays representative ESI(+)-MS of atenolol aqueous solutions according with time at pH 3. Similar spectra (not shown) were acquired at pH 9. The ESI-MS at zero irradiation time (Figure 7a) shows, as expected, predominantly the ion of m/z 267 for protonated ATE. After 160 min of ozonation (Figure 7b), ATE (m/z 267) was totally consumed and three intense ions of m/z 134, 206 and 222 were observed. It was reported that photocatalytic TiO2 degradation25 and biological advanced oxidation26 of atenolol afforded comparable degradation products as characterized by ESI-MS. Furthermore, the degradation species reported through TiO2 and biodegradation suggested a HO· radical Fenton-like pathway showing higher mass products than observed by us. However, based on the ESI-MS(/MS) data, a different mechanism for O3 treatment of atenolol is proposed as depicted in Figure 8.



 




Degradation of acebutolol

Figure 2 shows the UV spectra for the O3 treatment of acebutolol (1.5 × 10-4 mol L-1). The two characteristic absorption bands of acebutolol are those at 231 and 320 nm. As observed previously for nadolol and atenolol, complete consumption of the parent molecule is achieved but 15% of TOC removal was observed.

Figure 9 displays two representative ESI(+)-MS of acebutolol solutions for O3 treatment. The ESI-MS at zero irradiation time (Figure 9a) detects, as expected, the ion of m/z 337 corresponding to protonated acebutolol. After ozonation for 160 min (Figure 9b), acebutolol was completely consumed and four ions of m/z 134, 206, 222 and 284 were observed. These ions were characterized by ESI-MS/MS experiments and based on the MS data Figure 10 proposes a mechanism for its O3 treatment, assuming similar degradation pathways as proposed previously for atenolol and nadolol. Table 1 summarizes the accurate mass data of product ions for all species identified during the degradation processes of NAD, ATE and ACE.



 




Conclusions

As exemplified herein for three common pharmaceuticals, ESI mass spectrometry (and its tandem version) is a powerful technique able to provide detailed information about organic intermediates connecting parent molecules and final mineralization products during advanced oxidation processes. The ability to fish reactants, products, and intermediates (either ionic species or neutral species in their protonated or deprotonated forms) directly from the solution to the gas phase with gentleness, speed, and high sensitivity allows a detailed overview of the process and the interception and structural characterization of major players of the oxidation process. Whereas classical offline approaches such as GC-MS analysis can handle the more volatile and lighter species, the more polar, relatively unstable, or even transient intermediates or products, which may escape detection by other offline techniques or online techniques based on volatile species, may be intercepted and structurally characterized by online and real-time ESI-MS and ESI-MS/MS monitoring.

Acknowledgments

Financial support from the Proyecto Bicentenario de Ciencia y Tecnología PSD-16 and the Brazilian agencies FAPESP and CNPq is gratefully acknowledged. L. S. S. thanks FONDECYT (1085308) for financial support.

Submitted: June 3, 2010

Published online: February 3, 2011

FAPESP has sponsored the publication of this article.

  • 1. Daughton, C. G.; Ternes, T. A.; Environ. Health Perspect 1999, 107, 907.
  • 2. Ternes, T. A.; Water Res 1998, 32, 3245.
  • 3. Kolpin, D. W.; Skopec, M.; Meyer, M. T.; Furlong E. T.; Zaugg, S. D.; Sci. Total Environ. 2004, 328, 119.
  • 4. Boyd, G. R.; Reemtsma, H.; Grimm, D. A.; Mitra, S.; Sci. Total Environ. 2003, 311, 135.
  • 5. Glassmeyer, S. T.; Furlong, E. T.; Kolpin, D. W.; Cahill, J. D.; Zaugg, S. D.; Werner, S. L.; Meyer, M. T.; Kryak, D. D.; Environ. Sci. Technol. 2005, 39, 5157.
  • 6. Halling-Sørensen, B.; Nors Nielsen, S.; Lanszky, P. F.; Ingerslev, F.; Holten Lützhaft, H. C.; Jørgensen, S. E.; Chemosphere 1998, 36, 357.
  • 7. Halling-Sorensen, B.; Lykkeberg, A.; Ingerslev, F.; Blackwell, P; Tjornelund, J.; Chemosphere 2003, 50, 1331.
  • 8. Snyder, S. A.; Westerhoff, P.; Yoon, Y.; Sedlak, D. L.; Environ. Eng. Sci 2003, 20, 449.
  • 9. Jones, O. A.; Lester, J. N.; Voulvoulis, N.; Trends Biotechnol. 2005, 23, 163.
  • 10. Von Gunten, U.; Water Res. 2003, 37, 1443.
  • 11. Staehelin S.; Hoigne J.; Environ. Sci. Technol. 1982, 16, 676.
  • 12. Kasprzyk-Hordern, B.; Ziolek, M.; Nawrocki, J.; Appl. Catal., B 2003, 46, 639.
  • 13. Quispe, C.; Villaseñor, J.; Pecchi G.; Reyes P.; J. Chil. Chem. Soc. 2006, 51, 1049.
  • 14. Hernando, M. D.; Gomez M. J.; Aguera A.; Fernandez-Alba, A. R.; Trends Anal. Chem. 2007, 26, 581.
  • 15. Eberlin, M. N.; Eur. J. Mass Spectrom. 2007, 13, 19.
  • 16. Santos, L. S.; Knaack, L.; Metzger, J. O.; Int. J. Mass Spectrom. 2005, 246, 84.
  • 17. Santos L. S.; Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2008, 235.
  • 18. Dalmazio, I.; Santos, L. S.; Lopes, R. P.; Eberlin, M. N.; Augusti, R.; Environ. Sci. Technol. 2005, 39, 5982.
  • 19. Domingos, J. B.; Longhinotti, E.; Brandao, T. A. S.; Bunton, C. A.; Santos, L. S.; Eberlin, M. N.; Nome, F.; J. Org. Chem. 2004, 69, 6024.
  • 20. Gozzo, F. C.; Santos, L. S.; Augusti, R.; Consorti, C. S.; Dupont, J.; Eberlin, M. N.; Chem. - Eur. J. 2004, 10, 6187.
  • 21. Santos, L. S.; In Reactive Intermediates: MS Investigations in Solution; Santos, L. S., ed.; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, 2010, ch. 5.
  • 22. Chen, P.; Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2003, 42, 2832.
  • 23. Vogna, D.; Marotta, R.; Andreozzi, R.; Napolitano, A.; d'Ischia, M.; Chemosphere 2004, 54, 497.
  • 24. Moura, F. C. C.; Araujo, M. H.; Dalmazio, I.; Alves, T. M. A.; Santos, L. S.; Eberlin, M. N.; Augusti, R.; Lago, R. M.; Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 2006, 20, 1859.
  • 25. Yang, H.; An, T.; Li, G.; Song, W.; Cooper, W. J.; Luo, H.; Guo, X.; J. Hazard. Mat. 2009, 179, 834.
  • 26. Marco-Urrea, E.; Radjenovic, J.; Caminal, G.; Petrovic, M.; Vicent, T.; Barcelo, D.; Water Res. 2010, 44, 521.
  • *
    e-mail:
  • Publication Dates

    • Publication in this collection
      16 May 2011
    • Date of issue
      May 2011

    History

    • Accepted
      03 Feb 2011
    • Received
      03 June 2010
    Sociedade Brasileira de Química Instituto de Química - UNICAMP, Caixa Postal 6154, 13083-970 Campinas SP - Brazil, Tel./FAX.: +55 19 3521-3151 - São Paulo - SP - Brazil
    E-mail: office@jbcs.sbq.org.br