Acessibilidade / Reportar erro

Meroterpenoid Hydroquinones from Cordia globosa

Abstract

Two new meroterpenoid hydroquinones,rel-(4bE,6Z,8E,9aS,10S)-1,4-dihydroxy-9a,10-dihydro-10,12-epoxy-5-methylbenzo[a]azulen-12-one andrel-(4bZ,6Z,8E,9aS,10S)-1-hydroxy-9a,10-dihydro-4,11:10,12-diepoxy-benzo[a]azulen-11,12-dione, along with the known peptide derivative (S)-N-benzoylphenylalanine-(S)-2-benzamide-3-phenylpropyl ester, were isolated from the roots of Cordia globosa. Their structures were determined by 1D and 2D nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectrometry, Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy and high resolution atmospheric pressure chemical ionization mass spectrometry (HRAPCIMS) data analysis. The new compounds were tested against three human cancer cell lines (colon adenocarcinoma, ovarian carcinoma and glioblastoma), but none of them exhibited any activity.

Keywords:
Cordia globosa; Boraginaceae; hydroquinones


Introduction

The Cordia genus (Boraginaceae) comprises approximately 300 species widespread worldwide,11 Al-Musayeib, N.; Perveen, S.; Fatima, I.; Nasir, M.; Hussain, A.;Molecules2011, 16, 10214. many of which used in traditional medicine for different purposes as cicatrizing, anti-inflammatory, anthelmintic, antimalarial, diuretic and to treat urinary infections.22 Sertié, J. A. A.; Basile, A. C.; Panizza, S.; Matida, A. K.; Zelnik, R.; Planta Med.1990, 56, 36.

3 Marston, A.; Zagorski, M. G.; Hostettmann, K.; Helv. Chim. Acta1988, 71, 210.
-44 Tiwari, R. D.; Srivastava, K. C.; Shukla, S.; Bajpai, R. K.;Planta Med.1967, 15, 144.Cordia has proved to be a prolific source of meroterpenoid quinones, chromenes, hydroquinones and hydrochromenes.55 Bieber, L. W.; Messana, I.; Lins, S. C. N.; Da Silva-Filho, A. A.; Chiappeta, A. A.; De-Mello, J. F.; Phytochemistry1990, 29, 1955.

6 Diniz, J. C.; Viana, F. A.; Oliveira, O. F.; Maciel, M. A. M.; Torres, M. C. M.; Braz-Filho, R.; Silveira, E. R.; Pessoa, O. D. L.;Magn. Reson. Chem.2008, 47, 190.

7 Moir, M.; Thomson, R. H.; J. Chem. Soc.1973, 1, 1352.

8 Manners, G. D.; Jurd, L.; J. Chem. Soc.1977, 4, 405.
-99 Dettrakul, S.; Surerum, S.; Rajviroongit, S.; Kittakoop, P.;J. Nat. Prod.2009, 72, 861.

Previously, we have investigated some plants belonging to the genusCordia, including C. globosa and evaluated the antiproliferative properties of the isolated terpenoid quinones.1010 De Menezes, J. E. S. A.; Lemos, T. L. G.; Pessoa, O. D. L.; Braz-Filho, R; Montenegro, R. C.; Wilke, D. V.; Costa-Lotufo, L. V.; Pessoa, C.; De Moraes, M. O.; Silveira, E. R.; Planta Med.2005, 71, 54.

11 Freitas, H. P. S.; Maia, A. I. V.; Silveira, E. R.; Marinho-Filho, J. D. B.; Moraes, M. O.; Pessoa, C.; Lotufo, L. V. C.; Pessoa, O. D. L.;J. Braz. Chem. Soc.2012, 23, 1558.
-1212 Marinho-Filho, J. D. B.; Bezerra, D. P.; Araújo, A. J.; Montenegro, R. C.; Pessoa, C.; Diniz, J. C.; Viana, F. A.; Pessoa, O. D. L.; Silveira, E. R.; Moraes, M. O.; Costa-Lotufo, L. V.; Chem.-Biol. Interact.2010, 183, 369. In the present work the EtOH extract from roots ofC. globosa, an annual and aromatic shrub native to the northeast of Brazil, was investigated, which led to the isolation and characterization of two new terpenoid hydroquinones (1 and2), and a known peptide derivative (3) (Figure 1).

Figure 1
Structures of compounds 1-3 isolated fromC. globosa.

Experimental

General experimental procedures

The Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectra were recorded on a Perkin-Elmer spectrum 100 equipped with a universal attenuated total reflectance (UATR) accessory. Optical rotations were measured on a Perkin-Elmer 341 digital polarimeter. One-dimensional [1H, 13C, distortionless enhancement by polarization transfer (DEPT)] and two-dimensional nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) experiments [correlation spectroscopy (COSY), heteronuclear single quantum coherence (HSQC), heteronuclear multiple-bond correlation (HMBC) and nuclear Overhauser effect spectroscopy (NOESY)] were recorded on a Bruker DRX-500 spectrometer operating at 500 MHz for 1H and 125 MHz for 13C, using standard pulse sequences supplied by the manufacturer. The high resolution mass spectrometry (HRMS) using atmospheric pressure chemical ionization (HRAPCIMS) was performed on a liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry ion trap and time-of-flight (LCMS-IT-TOF, Shimadzu) spectrometer. The positive ion mass spectra were recorded in them/z 200-700 range, using a potential of 4.0 kV on the capillary and He as the collision gas. The high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) analysis was carried out using an ultra-fast liquid chromatography (UFLC, Shimadzu) system equipped with a SPD-M20A diode array UV-Vis detector and a Phenomenex C-18 column, 5 µm (4.6 × 250 mm2). The mobile phase consisted of H2O (trifluoroacetic acid (TFA) 0.2% v/v) and MeCN with a 4.5 mL min-1flow rate, oven temperature of 40 ºC and the chromatograms were monitored at 210-350 nm. Low performance liquid chromatography was carried out in glass columns packed with silica gel 60 (70-230 mesh, Vetec or 230-400 mesh, Merck). Thin layer chromatography (TLC) was performed on silica gel precoated aluminum sheets (kieselgel 60 F254, 0.20 mm, Merck). Fractions and pure compounds were monitored by TLC, and the spots visualized by heating (at ca. 100 °C) the plates sprayed with a vanillin/perchloric acid/EtOH solution.

Plant material

Roots of C. globosa were collected at Pico Alto, located at an approximate altitude of 1000 m, in Guaramiranga County, Ceará State, northeast of Brazil. The plant material was identified by PhD Maria Iracema B. Loiola, botanist of the Departamento de Biologia, Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC). A voucher specimen (No. 39.851) has been deposited at the Herbário Prisco Bezerra, UFC.

Extraction and isolation

The air-dried and powdered roots (7.5 kg) of C. globosa were extracted with hexane (3 × 10 L) followed by EtOH (3 × 10 L), at room temperature for 24 h, and the resulting solutions were concentrated under reduced pressure to yield 13.9 g (0.001%) and 67.8 g (0.001%) of the hexane and EtOH extracts, respectively. The EtOH extract (67.0 g) was fractionated over silica gel by elution with CH2Cl2, followed by EtOAc, to yield two main fractions weighting 24.0 and 9.0 g, respectively. The CH2Cl2 fraction (24.0 g) was subjected to a silica gel column chromatography using hexane-EtOAc (2:8, 4:6, 6:4 and 8:2, v/v) and EtOAc as eluents, providing 28 fractions, which were monitored by TLC and then pooled to 8 subfractions. Subfraction 23-27 (hexane-EtOAc 8:2, 1.9 g) was subjected to repeated fractionation over silica gel eluted with hexane-EtOAc, to yield a main fraction of 129.0 mg [hexane-EtOAc (4:6, v/v)]. This material was subjected to semi-preparative HPLC using H2O (TFA 0.2% v/v)-MeCN 6.5:3.5 to yield the pure compounds 1 (6.0 mg, tR 8.7 min) and2 (8.0 mg, tR 15.4 min). The EtOAc fraction (3.4 g) was subjected to flash chromatography using an isocratic solution of CH2Cl2-EtOAc 8:2 (v/v) to yield 95 subfractions of 8 mL. Sub-fraction 56-72 (80.0 mg) was further purified by HPLC using the mobile phase H2O (TFA 0.2% v/v)-MeCN 6:4 to afford compound 3(5.5 mg, tR 12.8 min).

rel-(4bE,6Z,8E,9aS,10S)-1,4-Dihydroxy-9a,10-dihydro-10,12-epoxy-5-methylbenzo[a]azulen-12-one (1)

Yellow powder; m.p. 197-203 °C; [α]D20 -195.3º (c 0.01, MeOH); IR (ATR) nmax / cm-13317, 1718, 1684, 1639, 1215, 1260; HRAPCIMS calcd. for C16H13O4 [M + H]+: 269.0808; found: 269.0808; 1H and 13C NMR spectral data, see Table 1.

Table 1
1H and 13C NMR data for compounds 1and 2

rel-(4bZ,6Z,8E,9aS,10S)-1-Hydroxy-9a,10-dihydro-4,11:10,12-diepoxy-benzo[a]azulen-11,12-dione (2)

Yellow powder; m.p. 200-205 °C; [α]D20 -129.3° (c 0.9, EtOAc); IR (ATR) nmax / cm-13466, 1750, 1628, 1465, 1188, 1209; HRAPCIMS calcd. for C16H9O5 [M + H]+: 281.0444; found: 281.0469; 1H and 13C NMR spectral data, see Table 1.

Cytotoxicity evaluation

Cytotoxicity was evaluated against three human cancer cell lines provided by the National Cancer Institute (Bethesda, MD, USA): colon adenocarcinoma (HCT-116), ovarian carcinoma (OVCAR-8) and glioblastoma (SF-295). Cells were maintained in Roswell Park Memorial Institute (RPMI) 1640 medium supplemented with 10% (v/v) fetal bovine serum, 2 mmol L-1 glutamine, 100 U mL-1penicillin, 100 µg mL-1 streptomycin at 37 °C under a 5% CO2 atmosphere. For all experiments, cells were plated in 96-well plates (1055 Bieber, L. W.; Messana, I.; Lins, S. C. N.; Da Silva-Filho, A. A.; Chiappeta, A. A.; De-Mello, J. F.; Phytochemistry1990, 29, 1955. cells perwell for adherent cells or 0.3 × 105 cellsper well for suspended cells in 100 µL of medium). After 24 h, all the compounds (0.048-5.0 µg mL-1) dissolved in 1% dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO) were added to each well using a high throughput screening system (Biomek 3000, Beckman Coulter, Inc.), and the cultures were incubated for 72 h. Doxorubicin (Zodiac) was used as a positive control. Control groups received the same amount of DMSO. Tumor cell growth was quantified by the ability of living cells to reduce the yellow dye 3-(4,5-dimethyl-2-thiazolyl)-2,5-diphenyl-2H-tetrazoliumbromide (MTT) to a purple formazan product as previously described.1313 Mosmann, T.; J. Immunol. Methods1983, 65, 55. At the end of the incubation, the plates were centrifuged and the medium was replaced with fresh medium (150 µL) containing MTT (0.5 mg mL-1). Three hours later, the plates were centrifuged, the MTT formazan product was dissolved in 150 µL DMSO, and the absorbance was measured using a multiplate reader (Spectra Count, Packard). The drug effect was quantified as the percentage of the control absorbance of the reduced dye at 550 nm. The concentration values that inhibit growth in 50% (IC50) were calculated, along with the respective 95% of confidence interval (CI), by non-linear regression using the software GraphPad Prism 5.0.

Results and Discussion

Compound 1, a yellow powder, showed IR absorption bands for hydroxyl groups (3317 cm-1), conjugated carboxyl of γ-lactone moieties (1718 cm-1), carbon-carbon double bonds (1684 and 1639 cm-1) and carbon-oxygen bonds (1215-1260 cm-1). The molecular formula of C16H12O4 (11 degrees of unsaturation) was determined by HRAPCIMS through the molecule protonated peak [M + H]+ atm/z 269.0808 (calcd. m/z 269.0808). The1H NMR spectrum (Table 1) exhibited signals for an aromatic ring at δH 6.85 (d, J 8.5 Hz, H-2) and 6.82 (d, J 8.5 Hz, H-3), indicating an AB system similar to those of a 1,4-hydroquinone moiety. In addition, signals at δH 7.03 (dd, J 5.8 and 1.6 Hz, H-8), 7.02 (d, J 11.4 Hz, H-6) and 6.77 (dd,J 11.4 and 5.8 Hz, H-7) were related to a coupling system of olefinic protons, while the signals at δH 6.17 (d, J 8.0 Hz, H-10) and 2.96 (d, J 8.0 Hz, H-9a) were associated with methines, one of which corresponding to an oxymethine proton. Finally, a singlet at δH 2.48 (s, Me-11), was compatible with a vinyl methyl. Besides the vicinal correlations for the protons H-2/H-3, H-6/H-7, and H-9a/H-10, the COSY spectrum exhibited the allylic coupling for H-9a and H-8, as well as the homoallylic coupling of H-9a and the Me-11. The13C NMR spectrum (Table 1) displayed signals for 16 carbon atoms, 13 of which corresponding to sp22 Sertié, J. A. A.; Basile, A. C.; Panizza, S.; Matida, A. K.; Zelnik, R.; Planta Med.1990, 56, 36. hybridized carbons. The DEPT spectrum revealed a methyl group at δC 23.6 (C-11), an oxymethine at δC 79.8 (C-10) and another methine atδC 47.7 (C-9a), in addition to five monohydrogenated sp22 Sertié, J. A. A.; Basile, A. C.; Panizza, S.; Matida, A. K.; Zelnik, R.; Planta Med.1990, 56, 36. carbon atoms atδC 118.8-144.2. Comparison of DEPT with13C NMR spectra revealed eight non-hydrogenated carbon atoms, one characteristic of a γ-lactone carboxyl atδC 167.3 (C-12), as well as the signals atδC 149.4 (C-1) and 147.6 (C-4) related to the oxygenated carbons of the 1,4-hydroquinone moiety. In addition, signals for three olefinic double bonds were observed, which, after COSY and HMBC analyses (Figure 2), were shown to make part of an extensive conjugated system involving the lactone carboxyl and the phenyl moiety. The long range correlations displayed by the oxymethine proton atδH 6.17 (d, J 8.0 Hz, H-10) with the carbon atoms at δC 149.4 (C-1), 127.8 (C-10a) and 129.4 (C-4b), were fundamental to assign the structure of compound1 as a 1,4-hydroquinone bearing a monoterpene side chain constituted of a γ-lactone fused to a seven members ring. Unfortunately, the NOESY spectrum (Supplementary Information Figure S8) was not decisive to help defining the relative stereochemistry of 1. The only undoubtful NOE observed was that of CH3-11 with H-6, whose cross peaks have not shown-up on the COSY spectrum. All the other observed cross peaks can either be assigned to COSY breakthrough or chemical exchange. However, the C-9a and C-10 stereocenters were proposed to be trans, in agreement with the corresponding protons coupling constant of 8.0 Hz. Based on the above mentioned data, the structure of1 was established asrel-(4bE,6Z,8E,9aS,10S)-1,4-dihydroxy-9a,10-dihydro-10,12-epoxy-5-methylbenzo[a]azulen-12-one.

Figure 2
Selected COSY (H-H) and HMBC (H→C) correlations observed for compounds 1 and 2.

Compound 2 was also isolated as a yellow powder. Its FTIR spectrum showed absorption bands for hydroxyl groups (3466 cm-1), conjugated carboxyl groups (1750 cm-1), carbon-carbon double bonds (1628 and 1465 cm-1) and carbon-oxygen bonds (1188 and 1209 cm-1). The molecular formula of C16H8O5 (13 degrees of unsaturation) was determined by HRAPCIMS analysis through the molecule protonated peak [M + H]+ at m/z 281.0469 (calcd.m/z 281.0444). Despite the 1H NMR spectrum of2 (Figure 1) being run in a different solvent (C5D5N) than that used for 1((CD3)2CO), it showed the same number of protons and splitting pattern, except for the disappearance of methyl group, revealing the same backbone structure of 1.

The 13C and DEPT NMR spectra of 2 were also similar to those of 1 (Table 1). The main difference was the appearance of an additional d-lactone carboxyl group atδC 161.6 (C-11) in compound 2, in substitution of the Me-11 of 1. The HMBC correlation of the proton signal at δH 7.62 (H-6) with the carboxyl atδC 161.6 supported the lactonization between C-4 and C-5 (Figure 2). Additional long range correlations, depicted in Figure 2, corroborated the structure of 2. The structures of compounds1 and 2 show a high degree of similarity, and one could then speculate on the biogenetic formation of 2 simply by the oxidation of Me-11 of 1 to the correspondent carboxyl acid followed by an intramolecular nucleophilic substitution reaction yielding theδ-lactone moiety. Thus, the structure of 2was established asrel-(4bZ,6Z,8E,9aS,10S)-1-hydroxy-9a,10-dihydro-4,11:10,12-diepoxy-benzo[a]azulen-11,12-dione.

Additionally to the new compounds, the peptide (S)-N-benzoylphenylalanine-(S)-2-benzamide-3-phenylpropyl ester (3) was also isolated, currently designated as asperphenamate,1414 Pomini, A. M.; Ferreira, D. T.; Braz-Filho, R.; Saridakis, O. H.; Schmitz, W.; Ishikawa, N. K.; Faccione, M.; Nat. Prod. Res.2006, 20, 537. anabellamide1515 Macabeo, A. P. G.; Tudla, F. A.; Alejandro, G. J. D.; Kouam, S. F.; Hussain, H.; Krohn, K.; Biochem. Syst. Ecol.2010, 38, 857. or auranamide1616 Boti, J. B.; Raphael, O. K.; Bighelli, A.; Eur. J. Sci. Res.2010, 47, 436. (Figure 1). This is the first report on the occurrence of this compound in Cordia spp.

Compounds 1-3 were tested in vitro for their antiproliferative effects against cancer cell lines HCT-116, OVCAR-8 and SF-295, however they didn't show cytotoxic activity (IC50 > 5.0 µg mL-1).

Conclusions

In this work two new meroterpenoid hydroquinones (1 and 2)were isolated from the EtOH extract of roots of Cordia globosa, in addition to a peptide derivative (3) not yet reported for this genus. Compounds 1 and 2 are 1,4-hydroquinones fused to a monoterpene moiety, a structural feature that is frequently found inCordia species, particularly in roots.

Supplementary Information

Supplementary information (1H and 13C NMR, COSY, HSQC, HMBC, NOESY, HRMS and FTIR spectra) is available free of charge at http://jbcs.sbq.org.br as PDF file.

https://minio.scielo.br/documentstore/1678-4790/YWZxrGWKXSFXxPQBkq7tVzb/8d79a71ea75cd35fbf4d49dd755bbb56071ea834.pdf

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the Brazilian agencies CNPq, CAPES and FUNCAP for the financial support.

References

  • 1
    Al-Musayeib, N.; Perveen, S.; Fatima, I.; Nasir, M.; Hussain, A.;Molecules2011, 16, 10214.
  • 2
    Sertié, J. A. A.; Basile, A. C.; Panizza, S.; Matida, A. K.; Zelnik, R.; Planta Med.1990, 56, 36.
  • 3
    Marston, A.; Zagorski, M. G.; Hostettmann, K.; Helv. Chim. Acta1988, 71, 210.
  • 4
    Tiwari, R. D.; Srivastava, K. C.; Shukla, S.; Bajpai, R. K.;Planta Med.1967, 15, 144.
  • 5
    Bieber, L. W.; Messana, I.; Lins, S. C. N.; Da Silva-Filho, A. A.; Chiappeta, A. A.; De-Mello, J. F.; Phytochemistry1990, 29, 1955.
  • 6
    Diniz, J. C.; Viana, F. A.; Oliveira, O. F.; Maciel, M. A. M.; Torres, M. C. M.; Braz-Filho, R.; Silveira, E. R.; Pessoa, O. D. L.;Magn. Reson. Chem.2008, 47, 190.
  • 7
    Moir, M.; Thomson, R. H.; J. Chem. Soc.1973, 1, 1352.
  • 8
    Manners, G. D.; Jurd, L.; J. Chem. Soc.1977, 4, 405.
  • 9
    Dettrakul, S.; Surerum, S.; Rajviroongit, S.; Kittakoop, P.;J. Nat. Prod.2009, 72, 861.
  • 10
    De Menezes, J. E. S. A.; Lemos, T. L. G.; Pessoa, O. D. L.; Braz-Filho, R; Montenegro, R. C.; Wilke, D. V.; Costa-Lotufo, L. V.; Pessoa, C.; De Moraes, M. O.; Silveira, E. R.; Planta Med.2005, 71, 54.
  • 11
    Freitas, H. P. S.; Maia, A. I. V.; Silveira, E. R.; Marinho-Filho, J. D. B.; Moraes, M. O.; Pessoa, C.; Lotufo, L. V. C.; Pessoa, O. D. L.;J. Braz. Chem. Soc.2012, 23, 1558.
  • 12
    Marinho-Filho, J. D. B.; Bezerra, D. P.; Araújo, A. J.; Montenegro, R. C.; Pessoa, C.; Diniz, J. C.; Viana, F. A.; Pessoa, O. D. L.; Silveira, E. R.; Moraes, M. O.; Costa-Lotufo, L. V.; Chem.-Biol. Interact.2010, 183, 369.
  • 13
    Mosmann, T.; J. Immunol. Methods1983, 65, 55.
  • 14
    Pomini, A. M.; Ferreira, D. T.; Braz-Filho, R.; Saridakis, O. H.; Schmitz, W.; Ishikawa, N. K.; Faccione, M.; Nat. Prod. Res.2006, 20, 537.
  • 15
    Macabeo, A. P. G.; Tudla, F. A.; Alejandro, G. J. D.; Kouam, S. F.; Hussain, H.; Krohn, K.; Biochem. Syst. Ecol.2010, 38, 857.
  • 16
    Boti, J. B.; Raphael, O. K.; Bighelli, A.; Eur. J. Sci. Res.2010, 47, 436.

Publication Dates

  • Publication in this collection
    Mar 2016

History

  • Received
    21 Aug 2015
  • Accepted
    22 Oct 2015
Sociedade Brasileira de Química Instituto de Química - UNICAMP, Caixa Postal 6154, 13083-970 Campinas SP - Brazil, Tel./FAX.: +55 19 3521-3151 - São Paulo - SP - Brazil
E-mail: office@jbcs.sbq.org.br