Carbon Nanotube-Supported Copper-Cobalt Catalyst for the Production of Higher Carbon Number Alcohols through Carbon Monoxide Hydrogenation

Abstract

A series of carbon nanotube (CNTs)-supported copper-cobalt catalysts were prepared and investigated in a slurry reactor for their ability to selectively convert syngas into higher carbon number alcohols. The 7.5Cu7.5Co/CNTs catalyst achieved superior selectivity towards the formation of ethanol (30.1%) and C₂₊ alcohols (57.7%), while the 10Co5Cu/CNTs catalyst exhibited the largest alcohol space-time yield (372.9 mg g_cat ^-1 h^-1). However, the pure Cu (15Cu/CNTs) catalyst displayed negligible activity. Cobalt reduction was enhanced in the presence of copper. In addition to the Cu⁰-Co⁰ center, Co⁰-Co²⁺ also presented dual active sites for higher alcohols synthesis, the Co²⁺ site could terminate carbon chain growth to produce alcohols. The ratio of Cu/Co considerably influences the metal particle properties-synergistically effecting the active species.

Keywords:
CO hydrogenation; higher alcohols synthesis; CuCo; carbon nanotube

Introduction

The conversion of synthesis gas derived from coal, natural gas or biomass into higher carbon number alcohols is both attractive and challenging to the field of C1 chemistry.^1-3 The alcohols obtained from this process can be used as fuel blends or as value-added chemicals in fine chemical synthesis.^4,5 Furthermore, higher alcohols synthesis (HAS) is a prototypical example of reactions that rely on synergistic effects between dual catalytic sites with different functionalities, one active site catalysis CO dissociation, while the second site enables CO non-dissociation centers to form.⁶ Typically, among the available non-precious metal catalysts, modified bimetallic Fischer-Tropsch (FT) catalysts (e.g., CuCo) are widely investigated as one of the most promising candidates for HAS.^7,8

Therefore, synergistic combination of two metals represents an efficient approach towards desirable catalytic properties by the creation of hybrid sites, and intimate contact between the metal components has been recognized as important to achieve satisfactory selectivity. It is known that Co species are the center for CO dissociation, hydrogenation and chain propagation to form surface alkyl species, while Cu species are the site for molecularly absorbed CO insertion and alcohol formation.^9,10 The synergistic effect and the surface distribution of the two active components have significant influence on the catalytic performance for the synthesis of alcohols.^11,12 It has been demonstrated that the porous structure of the support may efficiently control metal dispersion.^13,14 For supported catalysts, metal particle size is typically limited by the pore size of the support and the support texture may prevent sintering of the metal particles¹⁵ or limit sintering to the maximum pore diameter.^16,17 Furthermore, it is expected that the nature of the support may influence copper-cobalt interactions, which may lead to different active phase structures and properties. SiO₂, Al₂O₃ and TiO₂ have different interactions with cobalt species. Strongly interacting supports such as γ-Al₂O₃ usually lead to high cobalt oxide dispersions, however, there is difficulty to reduce cobalt species.¹⁸ To obtain appropriate Cu and Co nanoparticle properties and distribution in the catalyst, carbon nanotubes (CNTs) are employed as supports. A wealth of interdependent research^19-21 has demonstrated the advantages of using CNTs as supports to improve transition metal particle dispersion in catalysts and the confinement effects during catalysis have been systematically studied. Previous studies concluded that space restriction,²² enrichment of reactants inside CNTs²³ and the electronic interaction of the confined materials within CNTs²⁴ is expected to facilitate cobaltous oxide reduction. Therefore, there is a need to minimize the distance between dual catalytic sites, while maintaining active particles of sufficiently small size with a high degree of dispersion induced by the confinement effects of nanotubes.

In the present study, a series of CNTs-supported CuCo-based precursors with different Cu/Co ratios were synthesized using a simple and effective co-impregnation method. After calcination, a homogeneous and highly dispersed bimetallic catalyst was obtained, as revealed by high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM) analysis. In situ X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) indicated Cu⁰-Co⁰ and Co⁰-Co²⁺ centers were the active sites for HAS in our system. The catalytic performance of the catalysts prepared in this work towards the hydrogenation of carbon monoxide was examined in a slurry reactor. The maximum space-time yield (STY) reached 372.9 mg g_cat ^-1 h^-1 and an ethanol selectivity as high as 30.1% was obtained. Improved synergistic effects were observed between the dual active sites at a Cu/Co ratio range of 0.5-2, with the ratio exerting significant influence on the catalytic performance.

Experimental

Materials

Analytical-grade chemicals, including Cu(NO₃)₂⋅3H₂O and Co(NO₃)₂⋅6H₂O were purchased from the Beijing Chemical Co., Ltd. and were used as received without further purification. Multi-walled CNTs (outer diameter < 8 nm, lengths 10-30 μm) were purchased from Chengdu Organic Chemicals. High-resolution transmission electron microscope (HRTEM) analysis showed that the average inner diameter of CNTs was around 3.9 nm and the wall thickness of it was in the range of 1.5-3 nm. Raw CNTs were refluxed in HNO₃ (68 wt.%) for 14 h at 140 °C in an oil bath to purify and cut the carbon tubes, in contrast, CNTs with closed caps were obtained by refluxing CNTs in 37 wt.% HNO₃ for 5 h at 100 °C. Then, the mixture was filtered and washed with deionized water, followed by drying at 60 °C for 12 h. HRTEM analysis indicated that the ends of the CNTs were open and the lengths of them were 0.5-2 μm.

Synthesis of Cu/Co-based catalysts

The CNTs were immersed in an ethanolic solution of precursor salts of Cu, Co and then subjected to ultrasonic treatment and stirring. The ultrasonic treatment and stirring facilitated the filling of the CNT channels with the precursor solution during impregnation. After 10 h of impregnation, the mixture was dried at 60 °C overnight, followed by heating to 110 °C for 10 h. This process afforded a homogeneous distribution of the active components inside the channels of the CNTs. After drying, the products were calcined in N₂ at 673 K for 4 h with a heating rate of 2 K min^-1. A series of catalysts were prepared using this method, i.e., 15Co/CNTs, 12.5Co2.5Cu /CNTs, 10Co5Cu/CNTs, 7.5Cu7.5Co/CNTs, 10Cu5Co/CNTs, 12.5Cu2.5Co/CNTs, 15Cu/CNTs, and the active components supported on CNTs with closed caps was denoted as 10Cu5Co-out-CNTs. These numbers stand for the loading metals weight contents.

Characterization

Powder X-ray diffraction patterns (XRD) were recorded over the 2θ range from 5 to 85° using a Rigaku MiniFlex II X-ray diffractometer, which was operated at 40 kV and 40 mA with Cu Kα radiation (k = 0.15418 nm).

H₂-temperature-programmed reduction mass spectrometry analysis (H₂-TPR-MS) was performed to investigate the reducibility of the catalysts using a chemisorption instrument (TP-5080) and the sweep gas was detected using an OmniStar instrument. The catalyst (50 mg) was pre-treated at 300 °C under a flow of N₂ (32 mL min^-1) for 1 h and then cooled to 50 °C; after cooling, the flow was changed to a H₂/N₂ = 0.09 mixture (35 mL min^-1). The temperature-programmed reduction was performed between 50 and 800 °C with a heating rate of 10 °C min^-1.

X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) and X-ray Auger electron spectroscopy (XAES) were used to analyze the change in the surface composition using an AXIS ULTRA DLD instrument equipped with Al Kα (hv= 1486.6 eV). The sample was reduced in situ under a flow of H₂ at 400 °C for 1 h, and the following photoelectron lines were recorded: Cu 2p, Co 2p, C 1s and O 1s. The binding energy values were corrected for charging effects by referring to the adventitious C1s line at 284.5 eV.

The chemical compositions (Cu and Co) of the as-prepared samples were determined by inductively coupled plasma-atomic emission spectroscopy (ICP-AES) using a Thermo iCAP 6300 instrument.

The textural properties of catalysts were measured by using the N₂-sorption isotherm at 77 K on a Micromeritics ASAP2020 analyzer. Prior to each measurement, the sample was degassed at 200 °C overnight. The specific surface area was calculated by using the Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) equation. The micropore volume was obtained from the t-plot method. The mesopore volume was obtained from the Barrett-Joyner-Halenda (BJH) method using the desorption branch. The pore size distributions were evaluated by using the density functional theory (DFT) method applied to the nitrogen adsorption data.

The morphologies and microstructures of the materials were observed using a high-resolution transmission electron microscope (JEOL, JEM-2100F), which was operated at 200 kV, with a lattice resolution of 0.14 nm.

Catalysis studies

Carbon monoxide hydrogenation reactions were performed in a 0.5 L continuous slurry reactor equipped with a mechanical agitator. The reactions were conducted at a temperature of 573 K and pressure of 4.5 MPa, using a feed gas of a 2:1 mixture of H₂ and CO at a space velocity of 10000 mL g_cat ^-1 h^-1. The catalysts were reduced with a 10% hydrogen-in-nitrogen mixture for 3 h at 673 K in a tube furnace. After cooling to room temperature under a flow of high purity nitrogen, the reduced catalysts were added into an agate mortar with liquid paraffin, the solid particles were finely powdered, then the mixed liquid paraffin were transferred into the slurry reactor. All experimental data were obtained under steady-state conditions that were invariably maintained for 7 h and no deactivation was observed. The products were analyzed using five online gas chromatographs (GCs) during the reaction. The organic gas products, consisting of hydrocarbons and methanol, were detected online by flame ionization measurements using a GC4000A (GDX-403 column). The long chain hydrocarbons in the oil phase were detected by flame ionization measurements using a GC-2010 (Rtx-1 capillary column). The inorganic gas products were detected online by thermal conductivity measurements using a GC4000A (carbon molecular sieves column). The H₂O and methanol products in the liquid phase were detected by thermal conductivity measurements using a GC4000A (GDX-401 column). The alcohol products in the liquid phase were detected by flame ionization measurements using a GC-7AG (Chromosorb 101).

Results and Discussion

Structural and morphological study of the catalysts

Figure 1 presents the XRD patterns of the fresh catalyst samples. As shown, the characteristic CNTs peak was observed at a 2θ value of 25.8° and the intensity of peaks decreased gradually as a function of increased cobalt loading. The 15Cu/CNTs catalyst primarily consisted of a Cu₂O phase, with corresponding 2θ peak reflections positioned at 36.5, 42.4, 61.5, 73.7 and 77.6° (JCPDS No. 65-3288). Additionally, the CuO phase was also present in both the 15Cu/CNTs and 12.5Cu2.5Co/CNTs samples. As observed, the diffraction peak intensity of the CuO and Cu₂O species decreased gradually as the loading of Cu decreased. Furthermore, when the Co loading exceeded that of Cu, peaks corresponding to CoO (JCPDS No. 65-5474) were observed at very low intensities in these samples. In addition, carbon nanotubes seem to stabilize the CoO phase, which is usually unstable under ambient conditions. No other XRD characteristic peaks and significant shift of peaks were observed in these patterns, as bulk CoCu alloy may not be formed in the catalysts, due to the low solubility between Co and Cu. Furthermore, CuCo₂O₄ spinel or Cu²⁺ _xCo²⁺ _1-xCo³⁺ ₂O₄ structure may also not exist in these samples because of the absence of Co₃O₄ phase.²⁵

Figure 1
XRD patterns of the fresh catalysts.

The HRTEM images (Figures 2a-c) show nanoscale rows of metal particles in close proximity to each. As observed, the distances between two adjacent planes, d, were measured to be 0.24 and 0.21 nm, which are characteristic of Cu₂O and CoO phases, respectively. It is expected that such intimate contact among the metal particles would greatly improve the synergism of the Cu-Co dual sites and reduce side reactions. More HRTEM images are shown in Supplementary Information section (Figure S2), which could analyze the distribution of metal particles clearly. Additionally, approximately 81% of the particles reside within the channels of the 10Co5Cu/CNTs. In contrast, as shown in Figure 2e, 100% of the particles were located on the exterior surface of 10Cu5Co-out-CNTs. Furthermore, the particle size distribution of the 10Co5Cu/CNTs catalyst (Figure 2c), shows a size distribution of 2-4 nm both inside and outside the nanotubes. However, the main particles size increased to 10-20 nm for 10Cu5Co-out-CNTs. After reaction, as shown in Figures 2d-f, grain growth of nanoparticles were found in the samples. The most abundant particles were in the size range of 2-30 nm for 10Co5Cu/CNTs and 10-40 nm for 10Cu5Co-out-CNTs. It is also observed that many particles still encapsulated within the channels of 10Co5Cu/CNTs after reaction. Therefore, the confinement effect of carbon nanotubes may considerably influence the distribution of metal particles, without the confinement effect of the tubes, the cobalt and copper particles are easily aggregated during the reaction.

Figure 2
HRTEM images of fresh (a) 10Cu5Co/CNTs; (b) 7.5Cu7.5Co/CNTs; (c) 10Co5Cu/CNTs catalyst; (e) 10Cu5Co-out-CNTs; HRTEM images of used (d) 10Co5Cu/CNTs; (f) 10Cu5Co-out-CNTs, (600-700 particles were counted to determine the particle size distribution, and 300-400 particles were counted to calculate the percentage of particles inside and outside of the tubes).

The N₂-physisorption isotherms of the 10Co5Cu/CNTs catalyst are shown in Figure 3. According to the IUPAC classification, the catalyst exhibits a type IV isotherm having an inflection point around P/P₀ = 0.4. The BJH model was used to estimate mesopore size distributions. As shown in Figures 3a-b, it is observed that these samples possessed two types of mesopores, the CNT channels present a narrow pore size distribution with a pronounced peak at 3.4 nm, while the less uniform mesopores in the range of 10-50 nm were assigned to the interstitial voids among the CNTs. The BET surface area of the 10Co5Ce/CNTs and CNTs samples were 226 and 248 m² g^-1, respectively. It is indicated that all the samples has the similar BET surface area and pore size distribution.

Figure 3
Nitrogen adsorption-desorption isotherms and pore size distributions of (a) the fresh 10Co5Cu/CNTs catalyst and (b) CNTs sample.

Catalytic performance evaluation

The catalytic performance of the CuCo/CNTs series of catalysts was studied and compared. The data is presented in Table 1. As observed, the 15Cu/CNTs catalyst exhibited low activity and presented considerably low CO conversion and STY. Furthermore, methanol is the major product across alcohols formation. Conversely, the 12.5Cu2.5Co/CNTs catalyst exhibited considerably higher catalytic performance. The CO conversion and total alcohol STY increased by one order of magnitude relative to that of the 15Cu/CNTs sample. This result indicates that the addition of cobalt, even at low loading levels, has great influence on the properties of copper, and that there are synergistic effects between them. Additionally, the alcohol distribution results indicate that the reaction over CuCo/CNTs tends to favor the formation of C₂₊ alcohols. Thus, both structural and electronic interactions may exist between copper and cobalt.

Table 1
Catalytic performances of CuCo-based catalysts in CO hydrogenation

Sample	CO conversion / %	Total alcohol STY / (mg gcat-1 h-1)	Carbon selectivity / (C mol%)					Alcohol distribution / (C mol%)
			CH4	C2-C4	ROH	CO2		MeOH	EtOH	PrOH	BuOH	C5OH
15Co/CNTs	48.8	256.5	68.5	9.1	13.4	9.0		59.2	25.1	10.1	5.2	0.4
12.5Co2.5Cu/CNTs	40.1	266.9	61.1	12.1	24.5	2.3		56.8	25.0	10.6	7.1	0.5
10Co5Cu/CNTs	38.9	372.9	48.5	14.0	35.8	1.7		52.7	26.5	12.5	7.3	1.1
7.5Cu7.5Co/CNTs	32.6	318.2	43.2	20.4	34.2	2.2		42.3	30.1	16.8	9.6	1.3
10Cu5Co/CNTs	28.9	292.3	44.9	17.6	36.3	1.2		50.0	28.0	13.0	7.8	1.2
12.5Cu2.5Co/CNTs	21.3	230.9	50.4	11.1	37.0	1.5		57.8	25.0	11.0	5.5	0.7
15Cu/CNTs	3.5	21.4	30.3	29.7	27.1	12.9		85.1	9.1	4.0	1.8	0.1
10Cu5Co-out-CNTs	14.0	129.0	60.7	8.7	28.6	2.0		60.2	23.6	10.9	4.9	0.5
CNTs	0	0	-	-	-	-		-	-	-	-	-

• Reaction conditions: slurry reactor, 300 ºC, 4.5 MPa, 10000 mL g_cat^-1 h^-1, 2:1 H₂:CO syngas ratio, TOS: 7 h; STY: space-time yield; CNT: carbon nanotube.

As observed, the 7.5Cu7.5Co/CNTs catalyst displayed high activity and the selectivity of ethanol reached up to ca. 30.1%, with the selectivity for C₂₊ alcohols reaching ca. 57.7%. The 10Co5Cu/CNTs catalyst displayed a larger STY (372.9 mg g_cat ^-1 h^-1), together with a comparable higher alcohols distribution to that of the 10Cu5Co/CNTs sample. The 15Co/CNTs catalyst had a considerably higher activity with a CO conversion of 48.8% and a corresponding total alcohol selectivity of 13.4%. Further observations show that the selectivity for alcohols decreased as a function of increased cobalt loading in the catalysts. The excellent C₂₊ alcohols selectivity and yield are obtained over the catalyst with weight ratio of Cu/Co = 0.5-2. Taking high C₂₊ alcohols selectivity, low CO₂ selectivity and narrowed alcohols distribution into consideration, carbon nanotube-supported copper-cobalt catalyst turns to be better than CuZnAl²⁶ and Cu-Co/Mn₂O₃-Al₂O₃²⁷ catalyst recently reported for higher alcohols synthesis.

It is also observed that 10Cu5Co-out-CNTs exhibited a remarkably lower catalytic performance than that of 10Cu5Co/CNTs. The total alcohol STY decreased by 163.3 mg g_cat ^-1 h^-1, and furthermore, the total alcohols selectivity and the alcohol distribution results showed that particles on the outside were not as effective for HAS as particles inside the CNTs. In addition, the pure CNTs sample exhibited no activity for higher alcohols synthesis through CO hydrogenation.

Correlation studies on the active sites and catalytic behavior

H₂-TPR characterization

The H₂-TPR profiles of the fresh catalysts are presented in Figure 4. Specifically, the 15Cu/CNTs sample exhibited a broad peak within the temperature range of 200 to 380 °C, which was attributed to the reduction of Cu₂O and CuO based on the XRD results. The 15Co/CNTs sample exhibited peaks centered at 292, 395 and 520 °C, which were primarily attributed to the reduction of CoO based on the XRD results. It was observed that the temperature of the first reduction peak decreased gradually as a function of increasing the Cu loading. Catalyst reduction is indicated to be influenced by the strong mutual effect of cobalt and copper, and the reduction of cobalt is considerably enhanced by the presence of copper, which results in an obvious enhancement of catalyst reducibility in our system. The similar conclusion was also proposed by other researchers.^28,29 Hence, the first broad peak in the CoCu/CNTs samples was attributed to the reduction of copper and cobaltous oxide. Additionally, a broad peak at ca. 480 °C was observed in all of these samples. To confirm the assignment of the broad peaks, TPR-mass spectrometry analysis was conducted and the results are shown in Supplementary Information section (Figure S1). It was found that a degree of cobaltous oxide was reduced at the higher temperatures, the addition of metals and metal oxides accelerated the decomposition of the nanotubes and their reduction peaks overlapped with the decomposition peak of the CNTs.

Figure 4
H₂-TPR profiles of the fresh catalysts.

XPS characterization

XPS is typically employed to analyze the composition and oxidation states of catalyst surface species. Thus, in situ and ex situ XPS spectra of the Cu 2p, Co 2p, C 1s and O 1s core levels of the 10Co5Cu/CNTs and 15Co/CNTs samples were recorded.

The Co 2p XPS spectra of the fresh and reduced 10Co5Cu/CNTs samples are shown in Figure 5a. The Co 2p_3/2 main peak was observed at ca. 780.7 eV, along with a satellite peak at 786.7 eV. The peak with the lowest binding energy (778.8 eV) is attributed to Co⁰, whereas the peak observed at the higher binding energy (780.7 eV) is associated with Co²⁺ and the peak at 780.0 eV attributed to the Co³⁺ state.^30-32 To confirm the distribution of the Co species, the Co 2p XPS spectrum of the reduced 15Co/CNTs sample was measured (Figure 5c). The measured XPS surface layer revealed relative Co⁰/(Co⁰ + Co²⁺) ratios in the reduced 10Co5Cu/CNTs and 15Co/CNTs catalysts of 2.92 and 3.61%, respectively. Based on the experimental results, the Co²⁺ site is thought to be beneficial for high alcohol selectivity, associatively adsorption of CO on Co²⁺ site and coupling of CO and CH_x to form oxygenates. Similar results and discussion were also proposed by Wang et al.³³

Figure 5
(a), (c) Co 2p and (b) Cu 2p XPS spectra of the fresh and reduced catalysts (in situ reduction was conducted in H₂ at 673 K for 1 h).

As shown in Figure 5b, the Cu 2p_3/2 spectrum of the fresh sample is characterized by a main peak at 932.69 eV with a satellite peak appearing at a higher binding energy, indicating the presence of surface Cu²⁺.³⁴ Conversely, the Cu 2p_3/2 spectrum of the reduced sample was characterized by symmetrical major peaks and the absence of satellite structures. As XPS and XAES data show, for the fresh sample, E_b(Cu2p_3/2) is located at 932.69 eV with an E_k(CuL₃VV) value of 916.38 eV, giving an Auger parameter α′(Cu), of 1849.07 eV, which is associated with Cu⁺. However, for the reduced sample, E_b(Cu2p_3/2) and E_k(CuL₃VV) values are 932.89 and 918.02 eV, respectively, giving an α′(Cu) of 1850.91 eV, which is associated with Cu⁰.³⁵ Therefore, it could be deduced that only metallic copper is present on the surface of the catalysts after in situ reduction.

Compositional analysis to obtain Cu and Co content of the bulk 10Co5Cu/CNTs, 7.5Cu7.5Co/CNTs and 10Cu5Co/CNTs samples is measured using inductively coupled plasma-atomic emission spectroscopy (ICP-AES) and data is presented in Supplementary Information section (Table S1). Actual metal content reveals incorporation in ratios consistent with theoretical loading values.

Combined with the characterization analysis and experimental results, two mechanistic pathways are assumed for the CoCu-based catalysts in relation to the oxygenation of the generated carbon chain to form alcohols. The first route is a Cu⁰-Co⁰ center, with Co⁰ acting as an active site for CO dissociation, C-C chain growth, and hydrogenation to produce ^•C_nH_x groups, whereas Cu⁰ is the major site for methanol synthesis and is involved in the CO associative adsorption to form CO^•. The CO^• moiety moves to the ^•C_nH_x group (or vice versa) and is inserted via surface migration over a short distance between the Cu⁰ and Co⁰ sites for subsequent hydrogenation to produce higher carbon number alcohols. These alcohols synthesis mechanism has been termed as a CO insertion mechanism.³⁶ The second dual active site for alcohol synthesis is via the Co⁰-Co²⁺ center, the surface reactions on these sites are similar to those on the Cu⁰-Co⁰ center. On the Co⁰-Co²⁺ dual sites, metallic cobalt is the active site for CO dissociation and chain propagation, while Co²⁺ is the active site for CO associative adsorption and CO insertion, therefore Co²⁺ sites favor high oxygenate yields. A similar route for chain growth termination to produce alcohols was also proposed by Baker et al.³⁷ The metallic oxide Co pair (Co⁰-Co²⁺) could explain why the 15Co/CNTs sample also produces higher carbon number alcohols during the reaction; as shown in Table 1, the selectivity for total alcohol reaches up to 13.4%. The proposed mechanism is illustrated in Scheme 1.

Scheme 1
Reaction model for the formation of higher alcohols over the CuCo/CNTs catalyst.

The Anderson-Schulz-Flory (ASF) plots (logarithm of mole fraction vs. carbon number) for the distribution of alcohols obtained over four catalysts are shown in Figure 6. The carbon number distributions of alcohols obtained over the 15Co/CNTs, 10Co5Cu/CNTs and 10Cu5Co/CNTs catalysts display excellent ASF plots. Partial deviation from the ASF distribution was observed for the 7.5Cu7.5Co/CNTs catalyst. The appropriate Cu/Co ratio enhances the synergistic effect of the active species and improves C₂₊ alcohol selectivity.

Figure 6
ASF plots for the distribution of alcohols obtained over the investigated catalysts.

Conclusions

We have demonstrated that the bimetallic catalyst with a Cu/Co ratio from 0.5 to 2 favors higher carbon number alcohols formation during CO hydrogenation. The 7.5Cu7.5Co/CNTs catalyst exhibited a relatively high selectivity for the formation of ethanol (30.1%) and C₂₊ alcohols (57.7%) with a narrow range distribution, and the 10Co5Cu/CNTs catalyst displayed a high alcohol STY (372.9 mg g_cat^-1 h^-1).

The superior confinement effect allows intimate contact between the copper-cobalt active species in the nanotubes, which improves their geometric interactions and synergistic effect. The synergistic effect between copper and cobalt is crucial for optimal product distribution. Metallic copper alone shows negligible catalytic activity for CO hydrogenation, however, in the presence of Cu⁰-Co⁰ dual catalytic sites, Cu is effective, as the sites for the oxygenation of the generated carbon chains form alcohols, in addition to enhancing cobalt reduction. Furthermore, the Co⁰-Co²⁺ center is also beneficial to HAS, the Co²⁺ site terminating the carbon chain growth to produce alcohols and favor alcohols yields. The ratio of Cu/Co considerably influences metal particle properties and it likely plays an important role in determining the selectivity towards higher alcohols.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant No. 21573269), the Natural Science Foundation of the Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions of China (grants No. 17KJB150038 and 17KJB530010), the Research Project of Xuzhou Institute of Technology, China (grant No. XKY2016114), and Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province, China (grants No. BK20171168 and BK20171169).

Supplementary Information

Supplementary data (H₂-TPR-MS, HRTEM and ICP results) are available free of charge at http://jbcs.sbq.org.br as PDF file.

References

• ¹
  Luk, H. T.; Mondelli, C.; Ferré, D. C.; Pérez-Ramírez, J.; Chem. Soc. Rev. 2017, 46, 1358.
• ²
  Gangwal, V.; Gangwal, S. K.; Energy Fuels 2008, 22, 814.
• ³
  Wang, P.; Chen, S. Y.; Bai, Y. X.; Gao, X. F.; Sun, K.; Han, Y. Z.; Tan, Y. S.; Fuel 2017, 195, 69.
• ⁴
  Gupta, M.; Smith, M. L.; Spivey, J. J.; ACS Catal 2011, 1, 641.
• ⁵
  Wang, J. J.; Chernavskii, P. A.; Khodakov, A. Y.; Wang, Y.; J. Catal 2012, 286, 51.
• ⁶
  Fang, K. G.; Li, D. B.; Lin, M. G.; Xiang, M. L.; Wei, W.; Sun, Y. H.; Catal. Today 2009, 147, 133.
• ⁷
  Medford, A. J.; Lausche, A. C.; Temel, B.; Schjodt, N. C.; Norskov, J. K.; Top. Catal. 2014, 57, 135.
• ⁸
  Prieto, G.; Beijer S.; Smith, M. L.; Au, Y.; Wang, Z.; Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2014, 53, 6397.
• ⁹
  Xiaoding, X.; Doesburg, E. B. M.; Scholten, J. J. F.; Catal. Today 1987, 2, 125.
• ¹⁰
  Smith, K. J.; Anderson, R. B.; J. Catal. 1984, 85, 428.
• ¹¹
  Xiao, K.; Bao, Z. H.; Fang, K. G.; Lin, M. G.; Sun, Y. H.; Chin. J. Catal 2013, 34, 116.
• ¹²
  Subramanian, N. D.; Balaji, G.; Kumar, C.; Spivey, J. J.; Catal. Today 2009, 147, 100.
• ¹³
  Khodakov, A. Y.; Griboval-Constant, A.; Bechara, R.; Zholobenko, V. L.; J. Catal. 2002, 206, 230.
• ¹⁴
  Borg, Ø.; Eri, S.; Blekkan, E. A.; Storsæter, S.; Wigum, H.; Rytter, E.; J. Catal. 2007, 248, 89.
• ¹⁵
  Khodakov, A. Y.; Bechara, R.; Griboval-Constant, A.; Appl. Catal., A 2003, 254, 273.
• ¹⁶
  Karaca, H.; Safonova, O. V.; Chambrey, S.; Fongarland, P.; Roussel, P.; J. Catal. 2011, 277, 14.
• ¹⁷
  Karaca, H.; Hong, J.; Fongarland, P.; Roussel, P.; Lacroix, M.; Chem. Commun. 2010, 46, 788.
• ¹⁸
  den Otter, J. H.; Nijveld, S. R.; de Jong, K. P.; ACS Catal. 2016, 6, 1616.
• ¹⁹
  Deng, D.; Yu, L.; Chen, X.; Wang, G.; Jin, L.; Pan, X.; Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2013, 52, 371.
• ²⁰
  Chen, W.; Fan, Z.; Pan, X.; Bao, X.; J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 9414.
• ²¹
  Chen, W.; Pan, X. L.; Willinger, M. G.; Su, D. S.; Bao, X. H.; J. Am. Chem. Soc 2006, 128, 3136.
• ²²
  Pan, X.; Fan, Z.; Chen, W.; Ding, Y.; Luo, H.; Bao, X.; Nat. Mater. 2007, 6, 507.
• ²³
  Guan, J.; Pan, X. L.; Liu, X.; Bao, X. H.; J. Phys. Chem. C 2009, 113, 21687.
• ²⁴
  Guo, S.; Pan, X.; Gao, H.; Yang, Z.; Zhao, J.; Bao, X. H.; Chem. - Eur. J. 2010, 16, 5379.
• ²⁵
  Su, J.; Zhang, Z.; Fu, D.; Jiang, Z.; Xu, J.; Han, Y. F.; J. Catal. 2016, 336, 94.
• ²⁶
  Liu, Y.; Deng, X.; Han, P.; Huang, W.; Fuel Process. Technol. 2017, 167, 575.
• ²⁷
  Zhao, L.; Li, W.; Zhou, J.; Mu, X.; Fang, K.; Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2017, 421, 7414.
• ²⁸
  Wang, J. J.; Chernavskii, P. A.; Khodakov, A.Y.; Wang, Y.; J. Catal. 2012, 286, 51.
• ²⁹
  Fierro, G.; Jacono, M. L.; Inversi, M.; Dragone, R.; Porta, P.; Top. Catal. 2000, 10, 39.
• ³⁰
  Reinikainen, M.; Niemelä, M. K.; Kakuta, N.; Suhonen, S.; Appl. Catal., A 1998, 174, 61.
• ³¹
  Guczi, L.; Bazin, D.; Kovács, I.; Borkó, L.; Schay, Z.; Lynch, J.; Top. Catal. 2002, 20, 129.
• ³²
  Ernst, B.; Bensaddik, A.; Hilaire, L.; Chaumette, P.; Kiennemann, A.; Catal. Today 1998, 39, 329.
• ³³
  Wang, Z.; Kumar, N.; Spivey, J. J.; J. Catal. 2016, 339, 1.
• ³⁴
  Wang, J.; Chernavskii, P. A.; Wang, Y.; Khodakov, A. Y.; Fuel 2013, 103, 1111.
• ³⁵
  Wang, P.; Huang, W.; Zhang, G.; Gao, Z.; Tang, Y.; Sun, K.; J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 2015, 26, 243.
• ³⁶
  Fang, K.; Li, D.; Lin, M.; Xiang, M.; Wei, W.; Sun, Y.; Catal. Today 2009, 147, 133.
• ³⁷
  Baker, J. E.; Burch, R.; Hibble, S. J.; Loader, P. K.; Appl. Catal. 1990, 65, 281.

Publication Dates

• Publication in this collection
  July 2018

History

• Received
  03 Oct 2017
• Accepted
  20 Dec 2017