Speciation of Antimony in Injectable Leishmanicidal Drugs by Lowering Citric Acid Concentration Used in Hydride Generation Atomic Absorption Spectrometry Analysis

Abstract

This study proposes a procedure for speciation of antimony by hydride generation atomic absorption spectrometry in pentavalent antimony drugs. The Sb^III content was determined by selective generation of SbH₃ in medium with higher Sb^V concentration using 4 to 20-fold lower citric acid solutions than recommended in the available literature. The multivariate optimization of the methods was performed through factorial design followed by a central composite design (CCD). The limit of detection (LOD) and limit of quantification (LOQ) were calculated at 0.15 and 0.05 µg L^-1 and 0.48 and 0.17 µg L^-1, for total Sb and Sb^III, respectively. The relative standard deviation (RSD) values ranged from 3.1 to 19.6% and 9.1 to 20.1%, while recovery ranged from 95.6 to 102.3% and 89.1 to 108.1%, for total Sb and Sb^III, respectively. This method was applied for the analysis of meglumine antimoniate samples. Total Sb and Sb^III concentrations ranged from 79.2 to 101.1 mg mL^-1 and 0.08 to 0.41 mg mL^-1, respectively.

Keywords:
antimony speciation; leishmaniosis; meglumine antimoniate; citric acid; multivariate optimization

Introduction

In the group of neglected infectious diseases, leishmaniasis presents itself as a major challenge, accounting for a yearly estimated 700,000-1,000,000 new cases and 26,000-65,000 deaths in the world.¹ It is caused by leishmania protozoa, transmitted by the bite of infected female phlebotomine sandflies, and largely manifested as cutaneous (CL), mucocutaneous (MCL) and visceral (VL) leishmaniasis. The latter alone displays a mortality rate of non-treatable patients around 95%.¹

The first successful Brazilian treatment for cutaneous leishmaniasis was reported by Gaspar Vianna.^2-6 His treatment employed intravenous injections of trivalent Sb,^2-6 which were substituted a few years later by less toxic pentavalent antimony complexes as stibamine urea, the first of several safer pentavalent antimonials which remained the basis for all leishmaniasis treatments.^4,5 Two of these complexes, the antimony sodium gluconate and meglumine antimoniate (MA), were exploited since the 1940s and are still the most widely used drugs.^3-6

Nevertheless, antimonial therapy often requires close medical supervision, demanding parenteral injections for local pain and causing systemic side effects such as nausea, vomiting, weakness, myalgia, abdominal cramps, diarrhea, rash, hepatotoxicity and cardiotoxicity.^5-7 Generally, antimony drugs should be administered parenterally daily (typically 20 mg Sb kg^-1 per day for 20-30 days, not exceeding 850 mg of Sb),^4-6 but their toxicity mechanisms remain undiscovered. Even so, for pentavalent antimonials, Sb^III present as residues or produced through tissue reduction^8-12 is widely accepted as the responsible for side effects, antileishmanial action and drug resistance.^6,13 In fact, studies of the cytotoxicity mechanism of the emetic tartar suggest that Sb^III not only depletes intracellular glutathione and inhibits glutathione reductase, compromising the thiol homeostasis,^12,14,15 but also increases oxidative stress and reactive oxygen species (ROS), leading to apoptosis.^12,15-17

Meglumine antimoniate (MA) may be synthesized from KSb(OH)₆ or SbCl₅¹⁸ through two different synthetic routes which furnish compounds with lower in vitro cytotoxicity¹⁹ or even no significant histological changes or increased apoptotic activity in rats¹³ when compared to commercial MA. Considering that MA efficacy is related to the concentration of Sb^V and its toxicity may be related to the presence of Sb^III as a contaminant, it is important to determine the concentration of these two species as minimum quality parameters for drugs used in leishmaniasis treatment.

Hydride generation (HG) associated with atomic absorption spectrometry is a powerful tool for total Sb and Sb^III speciation at concentrations in the µg L^-1 range,^20,21 as well as hydride generation-inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry (HG-ICP OES).²² Inorganic antimony speciation usually occurs in two steps: first, a sample portion is used to determine total antimony in which the Sb^V is reduced to the Sb^III oxidation state using a reducing agent, such as L-cysteine, thiourea, potassium iodide and potassium bromide.²³ Subsequently, another portion of the sample is subjected to Sb^III determination in the presence of citrate, which forms a strong complex with Sb^V but does not react with Sb^III.^21-23 However, the use of citric acid may contribute to the memory effect, requiring a blank reading at each Sb^III determination,²¹ as well as causing severe contamination of the inner wall of the T quartz cell, requiring periodic cleaning by immersion in a nitric acid/hydrofluoric solution to maintain sensitivity.^21,22

The goal of this work was to develop a simple and fast procedure applied to inorganic antimony speciation in MA drugs used in the treatment of leishmaniasis, which consisted of the development of two HG-AAS analysis methods: total antimony using a reducing agent; and antimony(III) in the presence of citrate. The procedures were optimized by resorting to a full factorial design and central composite design (CCD).^24,25 Multivariate strategy allows the mapping of the experimental domain using a smaller number of experiments compared to a univariate methodology. Understanding the main factors and their interactions permitted the development of a mathematical model to predict instrumental response.

Experimental

Instrumentation

A SpectrAA-240 flame atomic absorption spectrometer (FAAS) (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, USA) equipped with a VGA-77 continuous flow hydride generator accessory was used. FAAS operating conditions were: wavelength, 217.6 nm; spectral resolution, 0.5 nm; lamp current, 7 mA; and acetylene and air flow rates, 2.1 and 13.5 L min^-1, respectively. High purity argon was used as purge gas at a flow rate of 90 mL min^-1. A quartz tube cell was heated under the flame and used for Sb atomization. A sketch of the HG system is shown in Figure 1. The multivariate optimization process was performed using Statistica version 10.²⁶

Figure 1
Operation scheme of Agilent Technologies model VGA 77 continuous flow hydride generator system.

Reagents and solutions

In the preparation of aqueous solutions, ultrapure water was used, obtained with a Direct-Q 3 system (Millipore, Burlington, USA) with resistivity of 18.2 MΩ cm. All materials, glassware and sample containers used throughout this work were previously cleaned in 10% (v v^-1) nitric acid solution (Merck, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil), immersed in acid bath for 16 h, rinsed with deionized water and dried in a dust free environment. A stock solution containing 1000 mg L^-1 Sb^V was prepared by diluting 0.1091 g of KSb(OH)₆ (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, USA) in 50.0 mL of 5% (m v^-1) HCl (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, USA), and a standard stock solution containing 500 mg L^-1 Sb^III was prepared by dissolving 0.1385 g of K₂(C₄H₂O₆Sb)₂.3H₂O (Neon Comercial Ltda, São Paulo, Brazil) in 50.0 mL of 0.05 mol L^-1 citric acid (Neon Comercial Ltda, São Paulo, Brazil). Intermediate standards were prepared daily by diluting aliquots of the stock solution with ultra-pure water. The tetrahydroborate solution was prepared daily by dissolving solid NaBH₄ (Vetec Quimica Fina Ltda, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil) and NaOH (Isofar Ltda, Capivari, Brazil) in water. A mixture of HCl (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, USA), KI (Êxodo Científica, Sumaré, Brazil) and ascorbic acid (Carlo Erba Reagents, Vexin, France) were used as working solutions for total Sb determination, and citric acid (Neon Comercial Ltda, São Paulo, Brazil) was used to prepare the working solution for Sb^III determination.

Samples

Three commercial MA samples (CMA1-CMA3) from different lots and four synthetic MA samples (SMA1-SMA-4), synthesized using the procedure described by Demicheli et al.,¹⁸ were used in this work. The SMA1 and SMA2 formulations were prepared using SbCl₅ as a pentavalent antimony source, while SMA3 and SMA4 samples were synthesized using KSb(OH)₆. Commercial and synthetic samples had a nominal concentration of 81 and 87 mg mL^-1 of Sb^V in aqueous solution, respectively. Samples were diluted with water and working solutions were prepared daily before use. The dilution factor used were 22,500,000 for Sb total and 275,000 for Sb^III. Total Sb and Sb^III determinations of samples were performed under optimized conditions.

Procedure

In the screening stage, factorial design was made based on some studies in the literature,^20,21 and on the conditions recommended by the equipment manufacturer. Central composite design (CCD) is a response surface methodology (RSM) used to find optimal conditions of the factors or variables. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) at 0.05 significance level was employed to identify significant factors and interaction effects. The validation of the models was determined by comparing the variance of the lack of fit (lof) and the pure experimental error (pe) with the values of the Fisher distribution (F-test, p = 0.05).^24,25 Experiments were conducted in randomized order.

For total Sb determination, all species of Sb^V shall be converted to Sb^III by the addition of an analytical standard (or MA sample) aliquot to a working solution containing 1.0 mol L^-1 HCl and a reducing agent (L-cysteine, KBr, thiourea and KI were previously tested). Potassium iodide was the reducing agent selected in the experimental design. It allows better instrumental responses, and ascorbic acid was added to stabilize the working solution. Hydrochloric acid and a mixture of NaBH₄ and NaOH was used in the acid channel and in the reducer channel of the VGA-77 accessory, respectively (Figure 1). To evaluate the signal intensity in the method optimization, working solutions were fortified with 5.0 µg L^-1 Sb^V.

For the selective determination of Sb^III, an analytical standard (or MA sample) aliquot should be added to a working solution containing citric acid that forms a stable complex with the present Sb^V and does not allow it to form hydrides and interfere with the Sb^III signal. Citric acid also is responsible for reacting with borohydride to provide hydrogen for the stibin formation reaction (SbH₃). Therefore, it was used in the acid channel at the same concentration as the working solution while a mixture of NaBH₄ and NaOH was used in the reducing channel of the VGA-77 accessory (Figure 1). To evaluate the selective determination of Sb^III and to verify the occurrence of signals related to Sb^V, in each trial of the experimental designs two working solutions were analyzed, one containing 5.0 µg L^-1 Sb^III and the other with a mixture of 5.0 µg L^-1 Sb^III and 400.0 µg L^-1 Sb^V.

Results and Discussion

Optimization of the total Sb determination method

Initially, a 2⁴ full factorial design with center point (CP) were evaluated: KI concentration [1.0(-); 5.5(0) and 10.0(+), in percentage (m v^-1)]; NaBH₄ concentration [0.6(-); 1.3(0) and 2.0(+), in percentage (m v^-1)]; HCl concentration used in the acid channel [5.0(-);7.5(0) and 10.0(+), mol L^-1], and the contact time of the analyte with the working solution (0(-); 60(0) and 120(+), s). Pareto’s chart (Figure 2) shows that the variables [NaBH₄], [KI] and contact time had a significant effect on instrumental response at 95% confidence level. The negative sign of the effects denotes that the use of lower NaBH₄ and KI concentrations led to an increase of the instrumental response, and the positive sign shows an increase in the response using the contact time (p = 0.05).

Figure 2
Pareto’s chart obtained from factorial design 2⁴ with central point (CP) for total Sb determination by HG-AAS.

A matrix experiments of central composite design (CCD) (Table 1) was performed to evaluate the previously selected significant factors (HCl concentration was set at 5.0 mol L^-1).

Table 1
Matrix experiments of central composite design (CCD) for total Sb determination by HG-AAS; values in parentheses are the coded values

Assay	[KI] / (%, m v-1)	[NaBH4] / (%, m v-1)	time / s	Integrated absorbance
1	0.8(-1)	0.7(-1)	25(-1)	0.1916
2	0.8(-1)	0.7(-1)	95(+1)	0.1728
3	0.8(-1)	1.1(+1)	25(-1)	0.2385
4	0.8(-1)	1.1(+1)	95(+1)	0.1601
5	1.6(+1)	0.7(-1)	25(-1)	0.2036
6	1.6(+1)	0.7(-1)	95(+1)	0.1788
7	1.6(+1)	1.1(+1)	25(-1)	0.1916
8	1.6(+1)	1.1(+1)	95(+1)	0.1418
9	0.5(-a)	0.9(0)	60(0)	0.1973
10	1.9(+a)	0.9(0)	60(0)	0.1675
11	1.2(0)	0.6(-a)	60(0)	0.2107
12	1.2(0)	1.2(+a)	60(0)	0.1678
13	1.2(0)	0.9(0)	0(-a)	0.1944
14	1.2(0)	0.9(0)	120(+a)	0.2002
CP	1.2(0)	0.9(0)	60(0)	0.1953
CP	1.2(0)	0.9(0)	60(0)	0.1929
CP	1.2(0)	0.9(0)	60(0)	0.2043
CP	1.2(0)	0.9(0)	60(0)	0.2064
CP	1.2(0)	0.9(0)	60(0)	0.1825

• CP: central point; a = 1.682.

The optimal values obtained by deriving the mathematical equations 1, 2 and 3 obtained by this design were: KI concentration = 1.00% (m v^-1); NaBH₄ concentration = 0.90% (m v^-1) and contact time = 40 s.

(1) $Z=-0.0071A-0.0058A^2-0.0064B-0.0033B^2-0.0104\mathrm{AB}$

(2) $Z=-0.071A-0.0053A^2-0.0117D-0.0028\mathrm{AD}$

(3) $Z=-0.0063B-0.0024B^2-0.0116D^2-0.0108\mathrm{BD}$

where, Z: instrumental response in integrated absorbance; A: KI concentration; B: NaBH₄ concentration; C: HCl concentration used in the acid channel and D: contact time of the analyte with the working solution.

Optimization of the Sb^III determination method

To optimize the analytical conditions for Sb^III determination by HG-AAS, three factors were initially evaluated using a 2³ factorial design with CP (Table 2): concentration of citric acid used in the working solution and in the acid channel; NaBH₄ concentration and analyte contact time with the working solution. During the experiments, the T quartz cell capillary became clogged due to the use of high citric acid concentrations in some assays. Therefore, it was necessary to interrupt the quantification to clean the T quartz cell by immersion in nitric/hydrofluoric acid solution for 30 s. This indicates that high concentration of citric acid should be avoided, to increase lifetime of the T cell. The Pareto’s chart (Figure 3) shows that the variables [NaBH₄] and [citric acid] had a significant effect on instrumental response at 95% confidence level. The signs of effects indicated that increasing NaBH₄ concentration and decreasing citric acid concentration affected the instrumental response (p = 0.05).

Table 2
Matrix experiments of factorial design 2³ with CP for Sb^III determination by HG-AAS; values in parentheses are the coded values

Assay	[CA]a / (%, m v-1)	[NaBH4] / (%, m v-1)	time / s	IAb	IAc
1	4(-)	0.6(-)	0(-)	0.1854	0.1812
2	20(+)	0.6(-)	0(-)	0.0979	0.1043
3	4(-)	2.0(+)	0(-)	0.1846	0.1921
4	20(+)	2.0(+)	0(-)	0.2315	0.1633
5	4(-)	0.6(-)	120(+)	0.1870	0.1881
6	20(+)	0.6(-)	120(+)	0.1222	0.1286
7	4(-)	2.0(+)	120(+)	0.1837	0.1885
8	20(+)	2.0(+)	120(+)	0.1753	0.1791
CP	12(0)	1.3(0)	60(0)	0.1779	0.2103
CP	12(0)	1.3(0)	60(0)	0.1777	0.1637
CP	12(0)	1.3(0)	60(0)	0.1872	0.2030
CP	12(0)	1.3(0)	60(0)	0.1955	0.2018
CP	12(0)	1.3(0)	60(0)	0.1826	0.2023

• ^a
  Citric acid concentration;
• ^b
  integrated absorbance in presence of 5 µg L^-1 of Sb^III;
• ^c
  integrated absorbance in presence of 5 µg L^-1 of Sb^III and 400 µg L^-1 of Sb^V. CP: central point.

Figure 3
Pareto’s chart obtained from factorial design 2³ with CP for Sb^III determination by HG-AAS.

On the other hand, the interaction between these two factors had a positive effect on the response. Therefore, increasing the concentration of one reagent while decreasing the concentration of the other will negatively impact the instrumental response. The variation of contact time was not significant, but its interaction with the reduced concentration led to a negative effect on the instrumental response. Based on this assessment, the CCD developed were shown in Table 3.

Table 3
Matrix experiments of central composite design (CCD) for Sb^III determination by HG-AAS

Assay	[Citric acid] / (%, m v-1)					[NaBH4] / (%, m v-1)				Integrated absorbancea	Integrated absorbanceb
	1st	2nd	3rd	4th		1st	2nd	3rd	4th
1	2.0	1.0	1.0	0.6		3.0	2.0	1.6	1.0	0.2425	0.2479
2	6.0	4.0	2.0	1.0		3.0	2.0	1.6	1.0	0.2240	0.2325
3	2.0	1.0	1.0	0.6		1.0	1.0	1.0	0.8	0.2436	0.2632
4	6.0	4.0	2.0	1.0		1.0	1.0	1.0	0.8	0.2462	0.2513
5	1.2	0.4	0.8	0.5		2.0	1.5	1.3	0.9	0.2351	0.2726
6	4.0	2.5	1.5	0.8		3.4	2.2	1.7	1.1	0.2426	0.2676
7	6.8	4.6	2.2	1.1		2.0	1.5	1.3	0.9	0.2458	0.2591
8	4.0	2.5	1.5	0.8		0.6	0.8	0.9	0.7	0.2443	0.2573
CP	4.0	2.5	1.5	0.8		2.0	1.5	1.3	0.9	0.2452	0.2666
CP	4.0	2.5	1.5	0.8		2.0	1.5	1.3	0.9	0.2692	0.2749
CP	4.0	2.5	1.5	0.8		2.0	1.5	1.3	0.9	0.2519	0.2684
CP	4.0	2.5	1.5	0.8		2.0	1.5	1.3	0.9	0.2504	0.2624
CP	4.0	2.5	1.5	0.8		2.0	1.5	1.3	0.9	0.2452	0.2666

• ^a
  Integrated absorbance of 4^th CCD in the presence of 5 µg L^-1 Sb^III;
• ^b
  integrated absorbance of 4^th CCD in the presence of 5 µg L^-1 Sb^III and 400 µg L^-1 Sb^V. CP: central point.

It took at least 100 s of contact time to suppress the interference from Sb^V when low concentrations of citric acid were applied, so this time was used in all subsequent experiments. As can be seen in Figure 4a, the response surface showed two trends, so in a second CCD (Table 3) we chose to explore the region in which lower concentrations of reagents were used. The response surface obtained in Figure 4b shows a maximum absorbance point for coordinates 1.2% (m v^-1) and 1.5% (m v^-1), referring to the NaBH₄ and citric acid concentration values, respectively. However, the model presented a lack of fit, so we decided to perform a third CCD experiment with the optimal concentration values obtained at the central point (Table 3). The model indicated a trend of higher sensitivity in two different directions again (Figure 4c), so following the same reasoning, we chose to explore the region of lowest reagent concentration values in a fourth CCD experiment (Table 3). The analysis of the response surface obtained (Figure 4d) showed that the highest absorbance values were obtained in the intermediate regions, especially at the point with concentration values of 1.0% (m v^-1) and 0.8% (m v^-1) for citric acid and NaBH₄ respectively, selected for the optimization.

Figure 4
Response surface plots obtained from CCDs for Sb^III. (a) 1^st CCD; (b) 2^nd CCD; (c) 3^rd CCD and (d) 4^th CCD.

Interference study

The working solutions containing the analytes and potentially interfering ions were analyzed by applying the optimized methods. Previous analysis of some commercial MA samples showed the presence of As, Cu and Pb as contaminants.²⁷ Although small amounts of nickel were detected (< 0.3 mg L^-1) in undiluted commercial samples, this element was also included in the interference study due to its strong effect on Sb measurements by HG-AAS.²⁷ The selectivity of the methods was evaluated by preparing working solutions contaminated with 3.5 µg L^-1 Sb^V or 1.5 µg L^-1 Sb^III for total Sb and Sb^III determination methods, respectively. Another group of working solutions containing the same amounts of Sb^V or Sb^III were also contaminated with 20 µg L^-1 of interfering Ni^II, Pb^II, Cu^II or As^III, as well as 400 µg L^-1 of Sb^V for the Sb^III determination method. Each of the solutions with or without interfering elements was prepared in independent triplicates, and the results were compared using 95% confidence level hypothesis tests (F-test and t-test). No interference was observed in Sb signals at the studied concentrations. Using 1.0% (m v^-1) citric acid, it was possible to selectively detect Sb^III in the presence of 8,000-fold Sb^V, while Flores et al.^20,21 observed this selective detection in the presence of 947-fold Sb^V using 20% (m v^-1) citric acid, and selective quantification of Sb^III was possible in the presence of 2,350-fold Sb^V, while the authors obtained this selective quantification in the presence of 1,300-fold Sb^V using 4% (m v^-1) citric acid.

Validation of the proposed method

In order to demonstrate that the analytical method produced reliable results and is suitable for the intended purpose, we subjected the optimized method to systematic evaluation by the experimental tests for validation indicated by the main guide used in Brazil.²⁸

Linearity was verified according to the procedures proposed by de Souza and Junqueira.²⁹ To estimate the linear regression parameters, the ordinary least squares (OLS) method was used. Six equally spaced points (to avoid leverage points) were used to plot the analytical curves, and readings were taken randomly. The concentration ranges chosen for evaluation of the calibration curves linearity were 0.0 to 8.0 µg L^-1 and 0.0 to 3.7 µg L^-1 for the total Sb and Sb^III determination methods, respectively. The Jackknife test was performed to detect and remove outliers. The verification that regression residuals were normally distributed, independent and homoscedastic was confirmed by the Ryan-Joiner coefficients of 0.9856 and 0.9787, Durbin-Watson statistics of 1.67 and 1.56, and t-Levene statistics of 0.166 and 0.223 for the total Sb and Sb^III determination methods, respectively. The linearity of the model was confirmed by ANOVA, which revealed that the regression was significant while the lack of fit was not significant. All statistical tests were performed with a 95% confidence level (p = 0.05).

The limits of detection (LOD) and quantification (LOQ) were calculated by measuring seven independently prepared blank analytical solutions (working solutions without metal). The LODs were calculated at 0.15 and 0.05 µg L^-1, and the LOQs were measured at 0.48 and 0.17 µg L^-1 for total Sb and Sb^III, respectively (LOD = LOQ/3.3 and LOQ = 10s/b, where s is the standard deviation of responses from 7 independent blanks and b is the slope of the analytical curve).

For repeatability and recovery tests, the sample was fortified at three concentration levels: 0.5; 3.5 and 8.0 µg L^-1 for Sb total, and 0.2; 1.5 and 3.5 µg L^-1 for Sb^III, performing seven independent determinations per level, expressed as the relative standard deviation (RSD) and percentage respectively. The RSD values ranged from 3.1 to 19.6% and 9.1 to 20.1%, while recovery ranged from 95.6 to 102.3% and 89.1 to 108.1%, for total Sb and Sb^III respectively. These values meet the acceptance criteria suggested by the Association of Official Analytical Chemists (AOAC) for the evaluated concentration ranges, which indicates the repeatability limit of 30% for the RSD value and the range of 40 to 120% for the recovery.³⁰ Validation results are presented in Table 4.

Table 4
Analytical figures of merit for total Sb and Sb^III determinations by HG-AAS

Parameter		Value (total Sb)	Value (SbIII)
Linear range / (µg L-1)		0-8.00	0-3.70
Slope		0.0369	0.0602
Intersection		0.0065	0.0009
R2 (n = 3)		0.9959	0.9968
LOD (n = 7) / (µg L-1)		0.15	0.05
LOQ (n = 7) / (µg L-1)		0.48	0.17
Repeatability by levels (n = 7) / %RSD	low	19.6	20.1
	middle	7.3	10.1
	high	3.1	9.1
Recovery by levels (n = 7) / %	low	95.6	108.1
	middle	102.3	94.5
	high	96.5	89.1

• R²: coefficient of determination; n: number of independent replicates; LOD: limit of detection; LOQ: limit of quantification; RSD: relative standard deviation.

Determination of total Sb and Sb^III in commercial and synthetic meglumine antimoniate samples

Total Sb and Sb^III were determined in commercial and synthetic MA samples using optimized conditions (Table 5). Total Sb concentration in three commercial MA samples lots ranged from 80.1 to 101.1 mg mL^-1 (nominal value of 81 mg mL^-1). In the determination of trivalent Sb in commercial

Table 5
Concentration of Sb^III and total Sb in commercial and synthetic samples using the HG-AAS proposed procedure. Results are expressed as mean ± standard deviation (n = 3); values in parentheses are the percentages of Sb^III out of total Sb

Sample	Total Sb / (mg mL-1)	SbIII / (mg mL-1)
CMA1	83.37 ± 1.89	0.14 ± 0.01 (0.17)
CMA2	80.08 ± 1.31	0.17 ± 0.01 (0.21)
CMA3	101.1 ± 2.9	0.08 ± 0.04 (0.08)
SMA1	79.23 ± 4.16	0.41 ± 0.01 (0.52)
SMA2	82.35 ± 1.96	0.41 ± 0.28 (0.50)
SMA3	83.59 ± 2.80	0.11 ± 0.01 (0.14)
SMA4	82.13 ± 2.16	0.13 ± 0.02 (0.16)

MA samples, the results ranged from 0.08 to 0.17 mg mL^-1, which corresponds to percentages of 0.08 to 0.21% of total Sb in commercial drugs. These results are equivalent to others found in the literature reporting Sb^III concentrations less than 0.3 mg mL^-1.^31-33 In earlier publications, Sb^III levels in commercial MA ranging from 1.7 to 15.5 mg mL^-1 were reported,^20,21,34-39 suggesting an adaptation in the commercial MA manufacturing process to control pentavalent antimony reduction.

Four MA formulations were synthesized for this work based on the method described by Demicheli et al.¹⁸ The SMA1 and SMA2 formulations were prepared using SbCl₅ as a pentavalent antimony source, while SMA3 and SMA4 samples were synthesized using KSb(OH)₆. There was no significant difference between the amounts of total Sb found in the four formulations, which were very close to the theoretical value, while the reported Sb^III content was slightly higher in formulations prepared with SbCl₅.

Results in Table 5 indicated that these formulations are suitable in the treatment of leishmaniasis with an adequate amount of Sb^V and a low content of Sb^III. It should be suggested as an efficient treatment against the disease with low potential of side effects. However, more studies are necessary to support this idea.

Conclusions

A method for inorganic antimony speciation in meglumine antimoniate samples used in the treatment of leishmaniasis was developed and evaluated.

In the development of the analytical method, the use of multivariate optimization allowed us to reach the condition of higher analytical signal intensity with a reduced number of assays, besides providing information on the interaction between the evaluated variables, which in the Sb^III determination method development was crucial to find the optimal condition of analysis with the use of a lower citric acid concentration. The use of citric acid at lower concentrations has eliminated problems reported in some publications such as the need for periodic quartz cell cleaning to maintain sensitivity,^20,21 and the requirement to measure a blank analytical solution after each Sb determination to correct memory effects.²⁰ Thus, there was no loss in the analytical frequency by one sample per min (45 s of delay and 15 s of triplicate reading). Even at lower concentrations, citric acid retained the ability to suppress Sb^V signals present at approximately 2,000-fold higher concentrations than Sb^III.

The methods were able to quantify total Sb and Sb^III in commercial and synthetic meglumine antimoniate samples, and may be used in the quality control of these formulations.

Acknowledgments

We are grateful for the financial support and scholarships from the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES) and Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq).

References

• ¹
  https://www.who.int/en/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/leishmaniasis, accessed in July 2020.
  » https://www.who.int/en/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/leishmaniasis
• ²
  Berman, J. D.; Rev. Infect. Dis 1988, 10, 560.
• ³
  Sneader, W.; Drug Discovery: A History, vol. 1, 1^st ed.; John Wiley & Sons Ltd: Chichester, UK, 2005, p. 472.
• ⁴
  Haldar, A. K.; Sen, P.; Roy, S.; Mol. Biol. Int 2011, 2011, 571242.
• ⁵
  Rath, S.; Trivelin, L. A.; Imbrunito, T. R.; Tomazela, D. M.; de Jesús, M. N.; Marzal, P. C.; Quim. Nova 2003, 26, 550.
• ⁶
  Frézard, F.; Demicheli, C.; Ribeiro, R. R.; Molecules 2009, 14, 2317.
• ⁷
  Lawn, S. D.; Armstrong, M.; Whitty, C. J.; Trans. R. Soc. Trop. Med. Hyg 2006, 100, 264.
• ⁸
  Goyard, S.; Segawa, H.; Gordon, J.; Showalter, M.; Duncan, R.; Turco, S. J.; Beverley, S. M.; Mol. Biochem. Parasitol 2003, 130, 31.
• ⁹
  Burguera, J. L.; Burguera, M.; Petit de Peña, Y.; Lugo, A.; Anez, N.; Trace Elem. Med. 1993, 10, 66.
• ¹⁰
  Lugo de Yarbuh, A.; Anez, N.; Petit de Peña, Y.; Burguera, J. L.; Burguera, M.; Ann. Trop. Med. Parasitol 1994, 88, 37.
• ¹¹
  Marquis, N.; Gourbal, B.; Rosen, B. P.; Mukhopadhyay, R.; Ouellette, M.; Mol. Microbiol 2005, 57, 1690.
• ¹²
  Ponte-Sucre, A.; Gamarro, F.; Dujardin, J. C.; Barrett, M. P.; López-Vélez, R.; García-Hernández, R.; Pountain, A. W.; Mwenechanya, R.; Papadopoulou, B.; PLoS Neglected Trop. Dis 2017, 11, e0006052.
• ¹³
  Kato, K. C.; Morais-Teixeira, E.; Reis, P. G.; Silva-Barcellos, N. M.; Salaüm, P.; Campos, P. P.; Corrêa-Junior, J. D.; Rabello, A.; Demicheli, C.; Frézard, F.; Antimicrob. Agents Chemother 2014, 58, 481.
• ¹⁴
  Wyllie, S.; Cunningham, M. L.; Fairlamb, A. H.; J. Biol. Chem 2004, 279, 39925.
• ¹⁵
  Wyllie, S.; Fairlamb, A. H.; Biochem. Pharmacol 2006, 71, 257.
• ¹⁶
  Timerstein, M. A.; Plews, P. I.; Walker, C. V.; Woolery, M. D.; Wey, H. E.; Toraason, M. A.; Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol 1995, 130, 41.
• ¹⁷
  Pulido, M. D.; Parrish, A. R.; Mutat. Res 2003, 533, 227.
• ¹⁸
  Demicheli, C.; Ochoa, R.; Lula, I. S.; Gozzo, F. C.; Eberlin, M. N.; Frézard, F.; Appl. Organomet. Chem 2003, 17, 226.
• ¹⁹
  Dzamitika, S. A.; Falcão, C. A. B.; Oliveira, F. B.; Marbeuf, C.; Garnier-Suillerot, A.; Demicheli, C.; Rossi-Bergmann, B.; Frézard, F.; Chem. Biol. Interact 2006, 160, 217.
• ²⁰
  Flores, E. M. M.; Santos, E. P.; Barin, J. S.; Zanella, R.; Dressler, V. L.; Bittencourt, C. F.; J. Anal. At. Spectrom 2002, 17, 819.
• ²¹
  Flores, E. M. M.; Paula, F. R.; Silva, E. F. B.; Moraes, D. P.; Paniz, J. N. G.; Santos, E. P.; Dressler, V. L.; Bittencourt, C. F.; At. Spectrosc 2003, 24, 15.
• ²²
  Cabral, L. M.; Juliano, V. N. M.; Dias, L. R. S.; Dornelas, C. B.; Rodigues, C. R.; Villardi, M.; Castro, H. C.; Santos, T. C.; Mem. Inst. Oswaldo Cruz 2008, 103, 130.
• ²³
  Ferreira, S. L. C.; dos Santos, W. N. L.; dos Santos, I. F.; Junior, M. M. S.; Silva, L. O. B.; Barbosa, U. A.; de Santana, F. A.; Queiroz, A. F. S.; Microchem. J. 2014, 114, 22.
• ²⁴
  Lundstedt, T.; Seifert, E.; Abramo, L.; Thelin, B.; Nyström, A.; Pettersen, J.; Bergman, R.; Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst 1998, 32, 3.
• ²⁵
  Ferreira, S. L. C.; Lemos, V. A.; de Carvalho, V. S.; da Silva, E. G. P.; Queiroz, A. F. S.; Felix, C. S. A.; da Silva, D. L. F.; Dourado, G. B.; Oliveira, R. V.; Microchem. J. 2018, 140, 176.
• ²⁶
  Statistica, version 10; StatSoft, Inc., USA, 2010.
• ²⁷
  Dédina, J.; Tsalev, D. L.; Hydride Generation Atomic Absorption Spectrometry, vol. 6, 1^st ed.; John Wiley & Sons Ltd: Chichester, UK, 1995.
• ²⁸
  Instituto Nacional de Metrologia, Normalização e Qualidade Industrial (INMETRO); DOQ-CGCRE-008 Orientação sobre Validação de Métodos Analíticos, 2016. Available at http://www.inmetro.gov.br/Sidoq/Arquivos/CGCRE/DOQ/DOQ-CGCRE-8_05.pdf, accessed in July 2020.
  » http://www.inmetro.gov.br/Sidoq/Arquivos/CGCRE/DOQ/DOQ-CGCRE-8_05.pdf
• ²⁹
  de Souza, S. V. C.; Junqueira, R. G.; Anal. Chim. Acta 2005, 552, 25.
• ³⁰
  Association of Official Analytical Chemists (AOAC); Guidelines for Standard Method Performance Requirements, 2016, available at http://www.eoma.aoac.org/app_f.pdf, accessed in July 2020.
  » http://www.eoma.aoac.org/app_f.pdf
• ³¹
  Santos, V. S.; Santos, W. D. R.; Kubota, L. T.; Tarley, C. R. T.; J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal 2009, 50, 151.
• ³²
  Lukaszczyk, L.; Zyrnicki, W.; J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal . 2010, 52, 747.
• ³³
  Seby, F.; Gleyse, C.; Grosso, O.; Plau, B.; Donard, O. F. X.; Anal. Bioanal. Chem 2012, 404, 2939.
• ³⁴
  Franco, M. A.; Barbosa, A. C.; Rath, S.; Dorea, J. G.; Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg 1995, 52, 435.
• ³⁵
  Rath, S.; Jardim, W. F.; Dorea, J. G.; Fresenius’ J. Anal. Chem 1997, 358, 548.
• ³⁶
  González, M. J.; Renedo, O. D.; Martinez, M. J.; Talanta 2005, 68, 67.
• ³⁷
  González, M. J.; Renedo, O. D.; Martinez, M. J.; Electroanalysis 2006, 18, 1159.
• ³⁸
  González, M. J.; Renedo, O. D.; Martinez, M. J.; Talanta 2007, 71, 691.
• ³⁹
  Renedo, O. D.; Martinez, M. J.; Electrochem. Commun 2007, 9, 820.

Publication Dates

• Publication in this collection
  20 Jan 2021
• Date of issue
  Jan 2021

History

• Received
  11 Mar 2020
• Accepted
  22 July 2020