SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.24 issue2Sensorial systems influence on the maintenance of the balance in pregnantBalance analysis in hemiparetics patients after training with Wii Fit program author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

Share


Fisioterapia em Movimento

On-line version ISSN 1980-5918

Fisioter. mov. (Impr.) vol.24 no.2 Curitiba Apr./June 2011

http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0103-51502011000200014 

ARTIGOS ORIGINAIS

 

Physical therapy treatment in incontinent women provided by a Public Health Service

 

Fisioterapia em mulheres incontinentes atendidas em um serviço público de saúde

 

 

Daniela D'Attilio ToledoI; Anny Caroline DedicaçãoII; Maria Elisabete Salina SaldanhaIII; Miriam HaddadIV; Patricia DriussoV

ISpecialist in Integrated Physiotherapy in Women's Health at Universidade de São Paulo (USP), São Paulo, SP - Brazil
IIEnhancement in Integrated Physiotherapy in Women's Health at Maternidade Hospital Leonor Mendes de Barros, São Paulo, SP - Brazil
IIIMaster in Morphology at Federal University of São Paulo, professor of the Physiotherapy course at Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP - Brazil
IVGynecologist at Maternidade Hospital Leonor Mendes de Barros São Paulo, SP - Brazil
VPhD in Sciences at Federal University of São Carlos, professor of Physiotherapy course at Universidade Federal de São Carlos, São Carlos, SP - Brazil, e-mail: pdriusso@ufscar.br

 

 


ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Urinary incontinence affects more than 50 million people worldwide, it has a great impact on quality of life by affecting social, domestic, occupational and sex life, regardless of age.
Objective: The objective of this study was to analyze the effectiveness of physical therapy treatment in women attending the Urogynecology service of Hospital and Maternity Leonor Mendes de Barros.
METHOD: We retrospectively assessed 65 records of patients with diagnosis of urinary incontinence treated between November 2005 and November 2006. In order to have their data analyzed, patients were divided into two groups; group MF, which underwent medical treatment and physiotherapy, and group M, which had only medical treatment. In order to compare both groups' quantitative data, the analysis was performed in Statistica® software using Mann Whitney's non-parametric test. The analysis of association between the quantitative variables was performed through the Chi-Square test at 5% (p > 0.05) significance level.
RESULTS: We observed that 60.6% of patients who underwent physical therapy treatment and medical treatment had the urinary incontinence symptoms decreased or completely cured, while 80% of women belonging to the medical treatmen only-group underwent surgery.
CONCLUSION: Thus, we conclude that physical therapy is essential in treatment protocols of urinary incontinence outpatient clinics and to prevent surgery.

Keywords: Urinary incontinence. Physical therapy treatment. Surgery.


RESUMO

INTRODUÇÃO: A incontinência urinária afeta mais de 50 milhões de pessoas em todo o mundo, apresenta um grande impacto na qualidade de vida, afetando a vida social, doméstica, profissional e sexual, independente da idade.
OBJETIVO: O objetivo deste estudo foi analisar a eficácia do tratamento fisioterapêutico em mulheres atendidas pelo serviço de Uroginecologia do Hospital e Maternidade Leonor Mendes de Barros.
MÉTODO: Foram avaliadas retrospectivamente 65 prontuários de pacientes com diagnóstico de incontinência urinária atendidos entre novembro 2005 e novembro de 2006. A fim de ter seus dados analisados, as pacientes foram divididos em dois grupos: grupo MF, formado por pacientes submetidas a tratamento médico e fisioterapêutico e grupo M, que submeterem-se à tratamento médico. A análise foi realizada no programa Statistica®, por meio de teste não paramétrico de Mainn Withney, para a comparação dos dados quantitativos entre os dois grupos. Para a análise da associação entre as variáveis quantitativas foi utilizado o teste Qui-Quadrado, adotando-se nível de significância de 5% (p > 0,05).
RESULTADOS: Observou-se que 60,6% das pacientes que realizaram o tratamento fisioterapêutico em associação ao tratamento médico obtiveram diminuição ou melhora total dos sintomas da incontinência urinária. Enquanto que 80% das mulheres do grupo que realizou tratamento médico foram submetidas à intervenção cirúrgica.
CONCLUSÃO: Portanto, concluí-se que o tratamento fisioterapêutico é parte importante nos protocolos de tratamentos nos ambulatórios de Incontinência Urinária e medida preventiva para intervenção cirúrgica.

Palavras-chave: Incontinência urinária. Fisioterapia. Cirurgia.


 

 

Introduction

The International Continence Society (ICS) had recently defined Urinary Incontinence (UI) as "any involuntary loss of urine" (1). UI can be classified according to its symptoms, clinical findings and additional examinations, as: Stress Urinary Incontinence (SUI), Overactive Bladder (OB) or Mixed Urinary Incontinence (MUI) (2).

The SUI is characterized by involuntary urine loss, when intravesical pressure exceeds the maximum urethral pressure in the absence of detrusor urinae muscle contraction. It usually happens when the person coughs, sneezes, laughs, jumps or even performs activities such as changing body position (3, 4). The OB is characterized by involuntary urine loss while feeling strong desire to urinate, whether the bladder is full or not, and is associated with increased urinary frequency, nocturia and urge incontinence. The symptoms are usually caused by involuntary detrusor urinae muscle contractions (5, 6). The MUI is characterized by the symptoms of both incontinence types described above (7).

Urinary incontinence affects more than 50 million people worldwide, from which 13 million are in the USA (8, 9). It is a common problem affecting women of all ages. Epidemiological studies performed in young adults show a prevalence varying between 30 and 55% (10). Institutionalized elderly women are the most affected by UI, whose prevalence progressively increases with age (8, 11, 12). From those women affected, 30% were below 60 years old, and 41-57% were over 65 years old (13, 14); 20-35% lived in communities and 30-60% were institutionalized (8, 15, 16).

Urinary incontinence substantially impairs one's quality of life (QL) by affecting social, domestic, occupational and sex life, regardless of age. According to Monz et al. (17) and Ghoniem et al. (18), the more severe symptoms are, the more they affect the QL. Shame prevents patients from seeking medical care and restricts their social lives, thus leading them toisolation.

Medical care is carefully evaluated and prescribedby physicians due to its side effects. OB is the UI typewith greater response to medical care, allowing the use of anticholinergics, alpha-agonists and tricyclic antidepressants. The latter is the most recommended, as it provides better results and fewer side effects (19, 20). The use of sacral neuromodulators and minimally invasive intervention stand out among surgical interventions, as these practices were approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), in 2002, to be employed in overactive bladder (21) treatment. Surgical options to treat SUI may include abdominal and vaginal procedures, laparoscope and related practices (22).

The physical therapy treatment is aimed at restoring patients' continence and improving their quality of life. There are several physiotherapy options for incontinent patients: kinesiotherapy, biofeedback, vaginal cone and electropathy. According to Aslan et al. (23), such results decrease urinary loss from 30 to 50% within a twelve-month period. The proper contraction of the pelvic floor (PF) muscles, especially the levator ani muscle, has been an efficient way to treat patients with UI and improve their toilet training (24, 25).

Biofeedback is a therapeutic resource efficiently used to treat women with UI by itselfor together with other therapies (26). By meansof audible or visual biofeedback, the patient acquires information on the physiological processof contraction, which was unknown in most cases until then (27). Aukee et al. (28) observed significant improvement in the strengthening of the PFmuscle in women with UI who had undergone biofeedback and kinesiotherapy treatment, within atwelve-year period. Morkved e Fjortoft (29) compared women with SUI who had performed PFfunctional training exercises with women who hadbeen trained with biofeedback, and observed 58% improvement in women who had used biofeedbackand 46% in those who had only exercised. Aksacet al. (30) also studied the effects of perennial exercise and biofeedback, and observed improvedstrength in both groups; however, there was greater gain in the group trained with biofeedback.

Electro stimulation can be performed through percutaneous, intravaginal or intrarectal application (31). The intracavitary way activates the afferent pudendal nerve, thus facilitating efferent response and causing the contraction of smooth and striated muscles in the paraurethral and PF region. The percutaneous application through the sacral roots or posterior tibial nerve act in the neuromodulation of the detrusor urinae muscle (32) activities, providing 60% general improvement in symptoms and significant statistical decrease in loss, number of absorbents used, frequency and nocturia (33). Although ES had been proved to be an useful therapeutic alternative for women with SUI, by achieving a 82.34% improvement rate (34, 35), its better results were achieved in patients with OB (32, 35, 36). A frequency between 35 and 50Hz (34) is used for the SUI treatment, while the OB treatment requires a frequency between 5 and 20 Hz (37).

The objective of this study was to verify the effectiveness of physical therapy in treating urinary incontinence, considering the muscular strength of pelvicfloor, urinary frequency, nocturia and continence.

 

Materials and methods

We performed a retrospective study of patients who underwent medical treatment for urinary incontinence at the Urogynecology Sector of Hospital Maternity Leonor Mendes de Barros, between November 2005 and November 2006. Patients were selected by means of an urodynamic examination registration program and were divided into two groups; from which one was going to undergo physical therapy (MF) while the other not (M).

During this period, 89 women had undergone the urodynamic examination. Patients with neurological diseases, diabetic neuropathy, congenital urologic disease, bladder cancer and neurogenic bladder were excluded from the study.

Thus, 72 patients were contacted by telephone and/or at the hospital's Urogynecology Sector (annual gynecological follow-up and/or participation in treatment groups) and were informed on the characteristics of the project (15 had changed their phone numbers and one had died). 65 women agreed to make their data available for this research and signed a Free and Clarified Consent Term, according to resolution 196/96 of the National Health Council. The research was approved by the Ethics Committee of Maternity Hospital Leonor Mendes de Barros, according to Opinion No. 13198462.

The group MF (n = 33) was comprised of patients who underwent physical therapy, regardless of the treatment performed (technique and number of sessions), simultaneously to the medical treatment. Group M (n = 32) was comprised of women sent to physical therapy treatment by the medical staff, but who did not attend the sessions whether for the lack of scheduling, time or money. In order tocompare both groups' quantitative data, the analysis was performed in the Statistica® software using Mann Whitney's non-parametric test. The analysis of association between the quantitative variables was performed through the Chi-Square test at 5% (p > 0.05) significance level.

 

Results

The average age of volunteers taking part in this study was 50.51  10.63. Women from the group that underwent physical therapy treatment had an average age of 53.68  10.08 (37-77) years, while the average age of women comprising the group who did not take physiotherapy was of 47  10.27 years (p = 0.06).

Table 1 shows the characterization of both groupsbased on the urinary incontinence diagnosis. One can notice the prevalence of SUI, followed by OB and MUI in both groups. According to the Chi-Square test, there was no statistical difference between the groups (p = 0.54).

 

 

Tables 2 and 3 show the characterization of both groups based on patients' previous gestational data.One can notice that there was no significant differences regarding these variables between the groups.

 

 

 

 

Table 3 shows the comparison regarding sexual and urinary complaints and surgeries. One can notice the homogeneity between the groups regarding all parameters except sexual complaints, which was significantly more evident in the group who underwent physical therapy treatment.

Table 4 shows the percentage of women who were medically discharged and underwent surgery. One can notice that there was a higher frequency of cure and lower frequency of surgeries among women who underwent physical therapy treatment.

 

 

Table 5 shows data collected in the physical therapy treatment (group FM). The physical therapy treatment varied from 4 to 15 sessions (8.7  3.4).

 

 

Discussion

According to Aldrigui et al. (38), the prevalence of UI in women increases with age, and according toLacima et al. (39), UI affects from 10-30% of 50 to 64year old women. The average age of volunteers takingpart in this study was 50.51  10.63, and corresponded to the climacteric period representing a predisposing factor for UI due to the reduction of estrogen andthe significant density of estrogen receptors in the urethra and in the bladder neck. Based on a population survey performed in the city of Campinas, Guarisiet al. (40) observed that 35% of climacteric womenhad SUI. Due to demographic changes in population,post-menopausal women will comprise a large portion of population in a near future. These women lead active lives, working, traveling, practicing sportsand physical activities, and urinary dysfunction represents a significant and substantial impairment intheir quality of life and daily activities (DA) (41, 42).

Usually the Literature (4, 9, 42-44) considers SUIto be the more prevalent type of incontinence amongwomen, varying between 12% and 56%. However,most studies have their diagnosis based on clinicalcomplaints. According to Table 1, there was higherprevalence of SUI in both groups. The factors related to dysfunctions in the pelvic floor are obesity,chronic bronchitis, vaginal births, multiparity, age,and changes in collagen (44). One can notice the highprevalence of pregnancy and vaginal births amongthe volunteers (Table 2), which can be one of thecauses for the SUI, as according to Haphpeykar et al.

(45) pregnancy and natural births are predisposingfactors for the occurrence of SUI. Studies point outthat women developing postpartum SUI are likely todevelop it again within a twelve-year period (46, 47).

Sexual complaints occurred in both groups; however, they were more present in group MF (Table 3).According to Kaiser et al. (48), organic, psychosocial and situational changes may influence women'ssexuality. The occurrence of diseases affecting genital or pelvic organs caused by aging, vaginal atrophy,decreased pelvic floor tropism, decreased lubricationand prior surgeries also decrease sexual desire (49).

Both groups had patients who had previouslyundergone surgeries to correct UI and in face ofthe persistence of its symptoms sought medicalcare again. The surgical correction is a costly process that can bring other symptoms and reduceone's activities, requiring rest. In addition, it canalso cause complications and morbidity and may not always satisfactorily cure UI. According to reports from relapsing patients, surgery would onlybe considered when all conservative options havealready been performed with no success or whenpatients refuse undergoing clinical treatment (50).Currently, physiotherapy is considered a first-linetreatment for UI providing beneficial results forbeing conservative, minimally invasive, havinglow rate of side effects, in addition to its low cost (51). The Pelvic Floor Assessment Group of theInternational Continence Society (ICS) publishedan article stating that urgency, frequency, OB andSUI are symptoms of dysfunctions in the pelvicfloor muscles and that its treatment should be performed together with the bladder retraining by aqualified Physiotherapist (52).

By the physical therapy treatment, it was possible to prevent surgery in 60% of cases (Table 4)using resources such as perennial exercise, biofeedback, vaginal cones, electro stimulation andbladder retraining according to the clinical complaints and results from the urodynamic study. Thelower percentage of surgery in women from groupMF shows that there are other treatment optionsthat should be taken into account and made available to patients with UI. Results found on gain ofstrength, decreased urinary frequency and nocturia show the effectiveness of the physical therapytreatment (Table 5).

Studies point out that perennial exercise (53), whether isolated or together with EE (54), is effective in reducing urinary loss and retraining the proprioception of the urogenital area. In a test using ES, Herrmann et al. (51) observed that 77.2% patients did not have any losses when exerting by the therapy completion. Thus, one can conclude that ES is one useful therapeutic alternative for women with SUI. Capelini (55) observed that the learning provided by biofeedback, its training and the maintenance of exercises bring good results by reducing urinary loss from about 8.1 to 0.4 a day. García-Giralda et al. (56) observed the effectiveness of the mixed UI therapy using medications to reduce overactive bladder together with a pelvic floor rehabilitation program. The use of ES can improve symptoms (33, 57, 58) up to 77% and may provide a 40% reduction in costs if performed instead of surgery.

Regardless of the technique employed, we found(Tables 5 and 6) a high success rate in this treatment,which provided data increasing the reliability of thistherapy. It also showed that we must rethink aboutthe physical and psychological conditions, which expose patients when priority is given to the surgery.

Despite all the encouraging data provided by this research, there is still much to do for urogynecologycal physiotherapy, as making patients aware of the importance of early treatment, and addressing the lack of motivation and adherence to the treatment as it does not produce immediate results. For it being a weekly treatment, many women quit it at the beginning, even before noticing any improvement in symptoms. The disclosure of and encouragement to this treatment option is essential toobjectively improve the patients' quality of life. One can also notice the need for early intervention before symptoms become evident and troublesome tothe patient, by making women aware of the pelvic floor function and of the importance of daily performing perennial exercise.

This study also shows the need for new studies comparing and proving which physiotherapy methods are the most efficient for each urinary incontinence type.

 

Conclusions

We therefore conclude that the use of physiotherapy techniques in women with urinary incontinence is an efficient way to decrease the symptoms and the number of surgeries required.

 

References

1. Bushnell DM, Martin ML, Summers KH, Svihra J, Lionis C, Patrick DL. Quality of life of women with urinary incontinence: Cross-cultural performance of 15 language versions of the I-QOL. Qual Life Res. 2005; 14(8):1901-13.         [ Links ]

2. Johnson T, Ouslander J. The shifting impact of UI. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2001;49(7):998-9.         [ Links ]

3. Zahariou AG, Karamouti MV, Papaioannou PD. Pelvic floor muscle training improves sexual function of women with stress urinary incontinence. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2008;19(3): 401-6.         [ Links ]

4. Oh SJ, Ku H, Hong SK, Soo WK, Paick JS, Son H. Factors influencing self-perceived disease severity in women with stress urinary incontinence combined with or without urge incontinence. Neurourol Urodyn. 2005; 24(4):341-7.         [ Links ]

5. Klausner AP, Vapnek JM. Urinary incontinence in the geriatric population. Mt Sinai J Med. 2003;70(1): 54-61.         [ Links ]

6. Homma Y, Koyama N. Minimal clinically important change in urinary incontinence detected by a quality of life assessment tool in overactive bladder syndrome with urge incontinence. Neurourol Urodyn. 2006;25(3):228-35.         [ Links ]

7. Margalith I, Gillon G, Gordon D. Urinary incontinence in women under 65: Quality of life, stress related to incontinence and patterns of seeking health care. Qual Life Res. 2004;13(8):1381-90.         [ Links ]

8. Torres C, Ciocon JO, Galindo D, Ciocon DG. Clinical approach to urinary incontinence: A comparision between internist and geriatricians. Int Urol Nephrol. 2001;33(3):549-52.         [ Links ]

9. Coyne KS, Zhou Z, Thompson C, Versi E. The impact on health-related quality of life of stress, urge and mixed urinary incontinence. BJU Int. 2003;92(7): 731-5.         [ Links ]

10. Jamison MG, Weidner AC, Romero AA, Amundsen CL. Lack of psychological resilience: an important corre-late for urinary incontinence. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2007;18(10):1127-32.         [ Links ]

11. Amarenco G, Amould B, Carita P, Haab F, Labat JJ, Richard F. European Psychometric Validation of the CONTILIFE: A Quality of Life Qustionnaire for Urinary Incontinence. Eur Urol. 2003;43(4):391-404.         [ Links ]

12. Hannestad YS, Rortveit G, Sandvik H, Hunskaar S. A communit-based epidemiological survey of female urinary incontinence: The Norwegian EPICONT Study. J Clin Epidemiol. 2000;53(11):1150-7.         [ Links ]

13. Brown JS, Posner S. Urge incontinence: new healthrelated quality of life measures. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1999;47(8):980-8.         [ Links ]

14. Huang AJ, Brown JS, Kanaya AM, Creasman JM, Ragins AI, Van Den Eeden SK, et al. Quality of life impact and treatment of urinary incontinence in ethnically diverse older women. Arch Intern Med. 2006; 166(18):2000-6.         [ Links ]

15. Wagg A, Potter J, Peel P, Irwin P, Lowe D, Pearson M. National audit of continence care of older people: management of urinary incontinence. Age Aging. 2008; 37(1):39-44.         [ Links ]

16. Frank C, Brooks P. Practice tips. Bedside cystometry. Can Fam Physician. 2000;46:559-60.         [ Links ]

17. Monz B, Pons ME, Hampel C, Hunskaar S, Quali D, Samsioe G, et al. Patient-reported impact of urinary incontinence-results from treatment seeking women in 14 european countries. Maturitas. 2005; 52(Suppl 2):S24-34.         [ Links ]

18. Ghoniem G, Stanford E, Kenton C, Achtari C, Goldberg R, Mascarenhas T. et al. Evaluation and outcome measures in the treatment of female urinary stress incontinence: International Urogynecological Association (IUGA) guidelines for research and clinical practice. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2008;19(1):5-33.         [ Links ]

19. Woodman PJ, Misko CA, Fischer JR. The use of shortform quality of life questionnaire to measure the impact of Imipramine on women with urge incontinence. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2001; 12(5):312-5.         [ Links ]

20. Shamliyan TA, Kane RL, Wyman J, Wilt TJ. Systematic review: randomized, controlled trials of nonsurgical treatments for urinary incontinence in women. Ann Intern Med. 2008;148(6):459-73.         [ Links ]

21. Aboseif SR, Kim DH, Rieder JM, Rhee EY, Menefee SA, Kaswick JR, et al. Sacral neuromodulation: cost considerations and clinical benefits. Urology. 2007; 70(6):1069-73.         [ Links ]

22. Petri E. Urologic trauma in gynaecological surgery: diagnosis and management. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 1999;11(5):495-8.         [ Links ]

23. Aslan E, Komurcu N, Beji NK, Yalcin O. Bladder training and kegel exercises for women with urinary complaints living in a rest home. Gerontology. 2008; 54(4):224-31.         [ Links ]

24. Sampselle CM, Miller JM, Mims BL, Delancey JO, Ashton-Miller JA, Antonakos CL. Effect of pelvic floor muscle exercise on transient incontinence during pregnancy and after birth. Obstet Gynecol. 1998;91(3):406-12.         [ Links ]

25. Santos PF, Oliveira E, Zanetti MR, Arruda RM, Sartori M, Castro R, et al. Eletroestimulação funcional do as-soalho pélvico versus terapia com os cones vaginais para o tratamento de incontinência urinária de esforço. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2009;31(9):447-52.         [ Links ]

26. Goermeley EA. Biofeedback and behavioral therapy for the management of female incontinence. Urol Clin North Am. 2002;29(3):551-7.         [ Links ]

27. Berghmans LCM, Hendriks HJM, de Bie RA, van Waalmijk ESC, Bo K, van Kerrebroeck PHEV. Conservative treatment of urge urinary incontinence in women: a systematic review of randomized clinical trials. BJU Int. 2000;85(3):254-63.         [ Links ]

28. Aukee P, Immonen P, Penttinen J, Jaippala P, Auraksinen O. Increase in pelvic floor muscle activity after 12 weeks training a randomized prospective pilot study. Urology. 2002;60(6):1020-3.         [ Links ]

29. Morkved S, Bo K, Fjortft T. Effect of adding biofeedback to pelvic floor muscle training to treatment. Obstet Gynecol. 2002;100(4):730-9.         [ Links ]

30. Aksac B, Aki S, Karan A, Yalcin O, Isikoglu M, Eskiyunt N. Biofeedback and pelvis floor exercises for the rehabilitation of urinary stress incontinence. Ginecol Obstet Invest. 2003;56(1):23-7.         [ Links ]

31. Vankerrbroeur PE. The role of electrical stimulation avoinding dysfunction. Eur Urol. 1998;34(suppl 1): 27-30.         [ Links ]

32. Van der Pal F, van Balken MR, Heesakkers JP, Debruyne FM, Bemelmans BL. Percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation in the treatment of refractory overactive bladder syndrome: is maintenance treatment necessary? BJU Int. 2006;97(3):547-50.         [ Links ]

33. Van Balken MR, Vandoninck V, Gisolf KH, Vergunst H, Lambertus A, Debruyne FJ, et al. Posterior Tibial Nerve Stimulation as Neuromodulative Treatment of Lower Urinary Tract Dysfunction 2001. J Urol. 2001; 166(3):914-8.         [ Links ]

34. Okada N, Igowa Y, Nishizawa A. Functional electrical stimulation for detrusor instability. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 1999;10(5):329-35.         [ Links ]

35. Carramão SS, Pacetta AM, Carramão S, Barros AD, Mantesse JC. Avaliação da eletroestimulação na terapêutica da incontinência urinária de esforço feminina. Rev Ginecol Obstet. 2003;14(4):166-9.         [ Links ]

36. Wang AC, Wang YY, Chen MC. Single-blind, randomized trial of pelvic floor muscle training, biofedback-assisted pelvic floor muscle training, and electrical stimulation in the management of overactive bladder. Urology. 2004;63(1):61-7.         [ Links ]

37. Burgio, KL. Current perspectives on management of urgency using bladder and behavioral training. J Am Acad Nurse Pract. 2004;16(Suppl10):4-7.         [ Links ]

38. Aldrigui JM. Alterações sistêmicas no climatério. Rev Bras Med. 2002;59:16-21.         [ Links ]

39. Lacima G, Pera M, Valls-Solé J, González-Argenté X, Puig-Clota M, Espuma M. Findings in females with combined fecal and urinary incontinence: a prospective study. Dis Colon Rectum. 2006;49(3):353-9.         [ Links ]

40. Guarisi T, Pinto Neto AM, Osis MJ, Pedro AO, Paiva LP, Faúndes A. Incontinência urinária entre mulheres climatéricas brasileiras: inquérito domiciliar. Rev Saúde Pública. 2001;35(5):428-535.         [ Links ]

41. Wakamatsu MM. What affects bladder function more: menopause or age? Menopause. 2003;10(3):191-92.         [ Links ]

42. Krause MP, Albert SM, Elsangedy HM, Krinski K, Goss FL, da Silva SG. Urinary incontinence and waist circumference in older women. Age Ageing. 2010; 39(1):69-73.         [ Links ]

43. Dugan E, Cohen SJ, Robinson D, Anderson R, Preisser J, Suggs P, et al. The quality of life of older adults with urinary incontinence: determining generic and condition-specific predictors. Qual Life Res. 1998; 7(4):337-44.         [ Links ]

44. Goode PS, Burgio KL, Locher JL, Roth DL, Umlauf MG, Richter HE, et al. Effect of behavioral training with or without pelvic floor electrical stimulation on stress incontinence in woman, a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2003;16(3):345-52.         [ Links ]

45. Ricther HE, Burgio KL, Brubaker L, Nygaard IE, Ye W, Weidner A, et al. Continence pessary compared with behavioral therapy or combined therapy for stress incontinence: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 2010;115(3):609-17.         [ Links ]

46. Haphpeykar SH, Mozayeni P, Young A, Fine PM. Stress urinary incontinence and counseling and practice of pelvic floor exercises postpartum in low-income Hispanic women. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2008;19(3):361-5.         [ Links ]

47. Altman D, Ekstrom A, Gustafsson C, Lopez A, Falconer C, Zetterstrom J. Risk of urinary incontinence after childbirth: a 10-year prospective cohort study. Obstet Gynecol. 2006;108(4):873-8.         [ Links ]

48. Viktrup L, Rortiveit G, Lose G. Risk of stress urinary incontinence twelve years after the first pregnancy and delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2006;108(2): 248-54.         [ Links ]

49. Kaiser FE. Sexual function and the older women. Clin Geriatr Med. 2003;19(3):463-72.         [ Links ]

50. Lamb SE, Pepper J, Lall R, Jorstad-Stein EC, Clark MD, Hill L, et al. Group treatments for sensitive health care problems: a randomized controlled trial of group versus individual physiotherapy sessions for female urinary incontinence. BMC Womens Health. 2009;9:26.         [ Links ]

51. Bø K. Is there still a place for physiotherapy in the treatment of female incontinence? EAU Update Series. 2003;1(3):145-53.         [ Links ]

52. Herrmann V, Potrick BA, Palma PR, Zanettini CL, Marques A, Rodrigues WJ. Eletroestimulação transvaginal do assoalho pélvico no tratamento da incontinência urinária de esforço – avaliação clínica e ultra-sonográfica. Rev Assoc Méd Bras. 2003;49(4): 401-5.         [ Links ]

53. Kafri R, Shames J, Raz M, Katz-Leurer M. Rehabilitation versus drug therapy for urge urinary incontinence: long-term outcomes. Int Urogynecol J. 2008;19:47-52.         [ Links ]

54. Berghmans LC, Hendrics HJ, Bo K, Hay AY, Smith EJ, Bie RH, et al. Conservative treatment of stress urinary incontinence in women, a systematic review of randomized clinical trials. Br J Urol. 1998; 82(2):181-91.         [ Links ]

55. Amaro JL. Tratamento clínico da incontinência urinária feminina: eletroestimulação endovaginal e exercícios perineais. São Paulo: Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade Estadual Julio de Mesquita; 2000.         [ Links ]

56. Capelini MVMA. Tratamento da incontinência urinária de esforço com biofeedback: análise objetiva e impacto sobre a qualidade de vida [dissertação]. Campinas: Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Faculdade de Ciências Médicas; 2005.         [ Links ]

57. García-Giralda RL, Guirao SL, Casas AI, Alfaro GJV, Sánchez PG, Guirao EL. Working with urinary incontinence in primary health care: satisfaction, sexuality and therapeutic compliance. Arch Esp Urol. 2007; 60(6):625-32.         [ Links ]

58. Eriksen BC, Eiknes SH. Long term electrostimulation of the pelvic floor: primary therapy in female stress incontinence. Urol Int. 1989;44(2):40-5.         [ Links ]

59. McAchran S, Daneshgari F. Sacral neuromodulation in the older woman. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2007;50(3): 735-44.         [ Links ]

 

 

Received: 02/07/2011
Approved: 03/19/2011

Creative Commons License All the contents of this journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License