SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.29 issue4Pulmonary function in patients with pandemic H1N1Use of Powerbreathe® in inspiratory muscle training for athletes: systematic review author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • On index processCited by Google
  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO
  • On index processSimilars in Google

Share


Fisioterapia em Movimento

On-line version ISSN 1980-5918

Fisioter. mov. vol.29 no.4 Curitiba Out./Dec. 2016

http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1980-5918.029.004.ao18 

Artigos de revisão

Intracavitary electrical stimulation as treatment for overactive bladder: systematic review

Eletroestimulação intracavitária como tratamento para bexiga hiperativa: revisão sistemática

Rafaela Fintelman Rodriguesa  b 

Elirez Bezerra da Silvab  c 

aUniversidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ), Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil

bUniversidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (UERJ), Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil

cUniversidade Gama Filho (UGF), Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil

Abstract

Introduction:

Overactive bladder (OAB) is a clinical diagnosis of irritating urinary symptoms that influence on sufferers' life quality. There are effective treatments described in literature, but most of them present adverse effects. One way of treatment is the use of electrical stimulation, which has been widely used, but studies show varying results.

Objective:

To verify if intracavitary electrical stimulation can be effective in patients with OAB.

Methods:

online databases were searched with specific descriptors to find randomized clinical trials on overactive bladder treated with intracavitary electrical stimulation. Only articles with score equal or higher than 5 in methodological PEDro scale were used and those that described intra and / or inter-group P-value.

Results:

217 articles were found, but only 6 were analyzed by the selection criteria. The studies show that electrical stimulation promotes the reduction of urinary frequency, urinary incontinence, nocturia, urgency and the number of protectors used, and improvements in maximum cystometric bladder capacity, symptoms of OAB and quality of life.

Conclusion:

Electrical stimulation was effective in patients with OAB and can be used before any invasive treatment due to none side effects.

Keywords: Overactive Bladder; Bladder Overactivity; Urge Urinary Incontinence; Detrusor Instability; Electrical Stimulation

Resumo

Introdução:

A bexiga hiperativa (BH) é um diagnóstico clínico de sintomas urinários irritantes que influenciam na qualidade de vida de seus portadores. Existem tratamentos eficazes descritos na literatura, porém a maioria deles apresenta efeitos adversos. Uma das formas de tratar é utilizando a eletroestimulação, a qual vem sendo muito utilizada, porém os estudos publicados apresentam resultados variados.

Objetivo:

Verificar se a eletroestimulação intracavitária pode ser eficaz nos distúrbios urinários de pacientes com BH.

Métodos:

Foram utilizadas bases de dados online com descritores específicos para busca de experimentos controlados randomizados, com pacientes portadores de BH tratados com eletroestimulação intracavitária. Foram selecionados apenas artigos com pontuação maior/igual a 5 na escala metodológica PEDro e que descrevessem P-valor intra e/ou intergrupos.

Resultados:

Foram encontrados 217 artigos, porém somente 6 atenderam aos critérios de seleção. A eletroestimulação promoveu a redução da frequência urinária, perda urinária, noctúria, urgência e do número de protetores utilizados diariamente, além de aumentar a capacidade cistométrica máxima da bexiga, melhorar os sintomas da BH e a qualidade de vida.

Conclusão:

A eletroestimulação mostrou-se eficaz em pacientes com BH, e por não apresentar efeitos colaterais, pode ser utilizada antes de qualquer tratamento invasivo.

Palavras-chave: Bexiga Hiperativa; Incontinência Urinária de Urgência; Hiperatividade do Detrusor; Eletroestimulação; Estimulação Elétrica

Introduction

The overactive bladder (OAB) is classified by the International Continence Society (ICS) as "urinary urgency, usually accompanied by frequency and nocturia, with or without urgency urinary incontinence, in the absence of urinary tract infection (UTI) or other obvious pathology" 1,2. Urinary urgency is a sudden and compelling desire to urinate, which is difficult to postpone. Frequency is when urination occurs more frequently during waking hours than what would be considered normal. Nocturia is the interruption of sleep one or more times because of an urge to micturate, each void is preceded and followed by sleep. However, the symptom that most limits patients with OAB is the urgency urinary incontinence (UUI) 3. Thus, the OAB is a clinical diagnosis characterized by the presence of irritating urinary symptoms 2 that influences the quality of life of the patients. It compromises 15 - 30% of women of all ages in relation to social, professional and sexual life 4, sometimes modify their social and work lives to accommodate their symptoms 5.

The most common risk factors for UUI in women are age, birth numbers, obesity, neurological disorders and chronic constipation 6. The prevalence of OAB is 7% to 27% in men and 9% to 43% in women 2. Such rates and symptoms tend to increase with advancing age 2,7. Irwin and colleagues 8) suggested in their study that the prevalence of OAB symptoms in women is higher than in men before age 60, afterwards this rate is reversed, becoming higher in men.

"The pathophysiology of OAB syndrome is overactivity of the detrusor muscle. The tone of the detrusor muscle during filling and voiding relies on the counterbal­ance of the autonomic (sympathetic and parasympathetic) nervous system" 3.

The literature describes many treatments for patients with OAB symptoms such as medications 3,9,10,11, behavioral therapies, pelvic floor exercises 9, electrical stimulation 12,13, biofeedback 14, catheterization 10, intravesical botulinum toxin 15) and surgical treatment, usually indicated when conservative treatments are not effective 10. However, drugs may have some adverse effects 16 and lead patients to quit treatment, although they have been proven to be effective in reducing symptoms and they still are the first choice for physicians. Catheterization, botulinum toxin and surgeries are invasive procedures that may cause infections and other complications, more indicated in specific cases. Physiotherapy techniques have few contraindications and do not exclude other future options of treatment. These techniques can improve and eventually restore pelvic floor function as bladder control 17.

Behavioral therapy (including bladder training, physiotherapy, bladder control strategies) is one of the therapy's modalities that should be considered as a first-line treatment for OAB 2,9,18,19. In literature, it is shown symptoms improvements with physiotherapy 20, especially with pelvic floor exercises for muscle strengthening 19,21, but few researchers attribute the same use and effects to electrical stimulation technique.

Electrical stimulation is widely used by physiotherapy to treat patients with overactive bladder syndrome because it inhibit detrusor involuntary contractions (22. The precise mechanism is not well understood yet, but researchers believe that the mechanism of action of this therapy is associated with reorganization of spinal reflex and regulation of cortex activity 23. Usually, the pontine micturition center is responsible for the central control of micturition and its peripheral control is given by neurotransmitters and nerve fibers that regulate the bladder, urethra and periurethral region 6. The effect of electrical stimulation in afferent pathways provides a preganglionic central inhibition of bladder's motor neuron influencing the detrusor activity, but the effects of this therapy in the sacral region are better known. In animal models it has been observed bladder relaxation by the inhibition of parasympathetic motor neurons 23. Berghmans et al. 17 report that electrical stimulation can induce a reflex contraction of the urethral striated muscle, combined with an inhibition of the nerve impulse that promotes detrusor muscle contraction.

Besides involuntary detrusor contractions, OAB usually occurs with weakness of the pelvic floor muscles causing UUI 6. Electrical stimulation also leads to the strengthening of these muscles 24 and can send afferent stimuli by pelvic organs to inhibit pre-ganglionic bladder innervation, as well as increase the urethral pressure by guardian reflex 6.

This systematic review, only including randomized controlled trials in its analysis, aimed to verify if intracavitary electrical stimulation is effective in patients with OAB.

Methods

This systematic review was drafted in accordance with PRISMA Statement recommendations and properly registered with the PROSPERO International prospective register of systematic reviews under no CRD42014010766 accessed at http://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/.

Inclusion criteria

The inclusion criteria considered the following cases: 1) studies with patients diagnosed with OAB; 2) studies that used intracavitary electrical stimulation as treatment; 3) studies comparing electrical stimulation treatment with those groups that used drugs, placebo or another intervention; 4) studies that present bladder activity as a result of the measurement; and 5) the ones that adopted randomized controlled trials design.

Search strategy

The Databases used were: Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro), PubMed and although MEDLINE and SciELO are integrated into the Health Virtual Library, these two were also consulted with the combination of the following keywords searched in Portuguese and English: bladder overactive, overactive urinary bladder, bladder overactivity, detrusor overactive, overactive detrusor function, urinary urge incontinence, detrusor instability, urge incontinence, electric stimulation, electrical stimulation. The descriptors were searched on two databases: Descriptors in Health Sciences (DeCS) and the Medical Subject Headings (MeSH).

Study selection

Studies with a score equal to or above 5 on methodological PEDro scale (http://www.pedro.org.au/portuguese/downloads/pedro-scale/) were selected. The score 5 was chosen because the highest number of studies evaluated by the PEDro base has this score 25. In addition to this criteria, the studies that showed P-value intra- and / or inter-group were also selected.

Results

The survey was conducted between November 20 and December 6 of 2013 with 217 articles identified from the criteria described above. The screening of the articles was performed only by the author, that removed the duplicated and those who did not meet the inclusion criteria. Only one study had no evaluation in PEDro base and was evaluated by the author in accordance with the criteria described in scale. Six studies published between 1996 and 2010 remained in this review for analysis. Figure 1 shows the flowchart with the screening process used, the number of items excluded with their justification and the number of selected items.

Figure 1 Flowchart information. 

The results of the six selected articles that show the effect of intracavitary electrical stimulation in people suffering from OAB syndrome are described in the table below, as well as the parameters used, and P-value.

Table 1 Results from studies with electrical stimulation in patients with OAB syndrome 

Discussion

In Table 1 it can be noted that all studies used low frequency electrical stimulation (4 and 10 Hz) to inhibit involuntary detrusor contractions. However, the pulse width presented great variability between studies. Great variability also occurred in duration and weekly frequency of treatment. Table 1 results showed that electrical stimulation can promote benefits for patients with overactive bladder, significantly reducing urinary incontinence, nocturia, urinary frequency and number of pads used, increasing the maximum cystometric capacity (MCC), bladder and improving the quality of life when compared before and after treatment (P < 0.05).

In Yamanishi's study 26 the electrical stimulation when compared with untreated group (control) proved to be an important strategy of improvement to overactive bladder (Table 1), and this result is reinforced by other researchers 12,31,32). When confronted with other forms of treatment such as medication 27,28,29 or pelvic floor exercises 14,28,30, electrical stimulation showed similar efficacy (P ≤ 0.05) results which were also supported by other studies 9,13,33,34,35,36. Reduction of frequency, urinary incontinence and number of pads used also occurred, besides the improvement in urodynamic data. Such reductions and improvements were also found in other studies 4,12,13,20,23,31,33,34. Brubacker 24 reports that "There is good evidence that the use of vaginal electrical stimulators can reduce the occurrence of symptoms of overactive bladder in about half of the patients treated". Abdelbary 37 showed that vaginal electrical stimulation and estrogen found to be effective in treating OAB symptoms.

Quality of life was assessed by different questionnaires: own Questionnaire 26, King's Health Questionnaire 14,27 and Incontinence Impact Questionnaire Short Form 29 (Table 1). All showed benefits from treatment with electrical stimulation, improving the quality of life. These results were also confirmed by other researchers 4,35.

The percentage of patients satisfied with electrical stimulation treatment was greater than 50%, reaching 59.40% as shown by Yamanishi 26, 52.4% by Arruda 28 and 87.60% by Ozdedeli 29. These percentages of patient's satisfaction were also replicated in other studies 20,33,34,32.

The effectiveness of electrical stimulation shown in this review can be explained by the reactivation of the inhibitory reflex of the detrusor, with consequent bladder relaxation (12. The inhibition occurs by reflex contraction of para and peri urethral striated muscles 17 or by afferent stimulation of the pudendal nerve 17, since that afferent stimulation promotes the contraction of the bladder 38.

Although electrical stimulation has been shown to be effective in treating the symptoms of OAB, this effect can not occur so markedly in older population. Spruijt 39 showed low efficacy of electrical stimulation and perineal exercises, when applied to the elderly, correlating these findings about aging to hormonal changes and great emotional impact. The UI in elderly is considered multifactorial, including changes in body tissues, anatomy, lifestyle and personal characteristics. Furthermore, there is a reduction in bladder muscarinic receptors and innervation may influence recovery 40.

Therapy with electrical stimulation become a promissory possibility of intervention in patients with OAB, as they do not have adverse effects such as medications, shown by Smith 32 and Franzen 35 and is not characterized as a so-invasive and harmful procedure as surgical corrections, which are indicated only when there is no satisfactory results with conservative therapies 10. Note that electrical stimulation only need an initial adaptation of the patient to electrical current since it can cause discomfort, but along the therapy occurs an accommodation of the magnitude of the fibers, becoming more comfortable.

Conclusion

According to results of this review, the intracavitary electrical stimulation is effective in patients with OAB syndrome as well as other therapies already described, such as medications, pelvic floor exercises and surgery, but the former is less invasive and presents no side effects. Therefore, electrical stimulation becomes an important strategy to be considered in the treatment of OAB symptoms.

References

Hayle, BT; Ridder, D; Freeman, RM; Swift, SE; Berghmans, B; Lee, J et al. An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA)/International Continence Society (ICS) joint reports on the terminology for female pelvic floor dysfuntion. Neurourol Urodyn. 2010;29(1):4-20. [ Links ]

Gormley, EA; Lightner, DJ; Burgio, KL; Chai, TC; Clemens, JQ; Culkin, DJ; et al. Diagnosis and treatment of overactive bladder (non-neurogenic) in adults: AUA-SUFU guideline. J Urol. 2012;188(6 Suppl):2455-63. [ Links ]

Jayarajan, J; Radomski, SB. Pharmacotherapy of overactive bladder in adults: a review of efficacy, tolerability and quality of life. Res Rep Urol. 2013;6:1-16. [ Links ]

Franco, MM; Souza, FO; Vasconcelos, ECLM; Freitas, MMS; Ferreira, CHJ. Avaliação da qualidade de vida e da perda urinária de mulheres com bexiga hiperativa tratadas com eletroestimulação transvaginal ou do nervo tibial. Fisioter Pesqui. 2011;18(2):145-50. [ Links ]

Hartmann, KE; McPheeters, ML; Biller, DH; Ward, RM; McKoy, JN; Jerome, RN; et al. Treatment of overactive bladder in women. Evidence reports/technology assessments, No. 187. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2009. [ Links ]

Greer, JA; Smith, AL; Arya, LA. Pelvic floor muscle training for urgency urinary incontinence in women: a systematic review. Int Urogynecol J. 2012;23(6):687-97. [ Links ]

Holroyd-Leduc, JM; Straus, SE. Management of urinary incontinence in women. JAMA. 2004;291(8):986-95. [ Links ]

Irwin, DE; Milsom, I; Hunskaar, S; Reilly, K; Kopp, Z. Population-based survey of urinary incontinence, overactive bladder, and other lower urinary tract symptoms in five countries: results of the EPIG study. Eur Urol. 2006;50(6):1306-14. [ Links ]

Yamaguchi, O; Nishizawa, O; Takeda, M; Yokoyama, O; Homma, Y. Clinical guidelines for overactive bladder. Int J Urol. 2009;16(2):126-42. [ Links ]

Robinson, D; Giarenis, I; Cardozo, L. The management of overactive bladder refratory to medical therapy. Maturitas. 2013;75(1):101-4. [ Links ]

Robinson, D; Giarenis, I; Cardozo, L. The medical management of refratory overactive bladder. Maturitas 2013;74(4):386-90. [ Links ]

Barroso, JCV; Ramos, JGL; Martins-Costa, S; Sanches, PRS; Muller, AF. Transvaginal electrical stimulation in the treatment of urinary incontinence. BJU Int. 2004;93(3):319-23. [ Links ]

Chêne, G; Mansoor, A; Jacquetin, B; Mellier, G; Douvier, S; Sergent, F; et al. Female Urinary incontinence and intravaginal electrical stimulation: an observational prospective study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2013;170(1):275-80. [ Links ]

Wang, AC; Wang, YY; Chen, MC. Single-blind, randomized trial of pelvic floor muscle training, biofeedback-assisted pelvic floor muscle training, and electrical stimulation in the management of overactive bladder. Urology. 2004;63(1):61-6. [ Links ]

Tubaro, A; Puccini, F; Nunzio, C. The management of overactive bladder: percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation, sacral nerve stimulation, or botulinum toxin? Curr Opin Urol. 2015;25(4):305-10. [ Links ]

Lam, S; Hilas, O. Pharmacologic management of overactive bladder. Clin Interv Aging. 2007;2(3):337-45. [ Links ]

Berghmans, LC; Hendriks, HJ; De Bie, RA; van, Waalwijk; van Doorn, ES; Bø, K; van Kerrebroeck, PE. Conservative Treatment of Urge Urinary Incontinence in Women: a Systematic Review of Randomized Clinical Trials. BJU Int. 2000;85(3):254-63. [ Links ]

Arruda, RM; Castro, R; Sartori, M; Girão, MJ. Comparison between oxybutynin, functional electrical stimulation and pelvic floor training for treatment of detrusor overactivity in women: a review. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2009;21(5):412-4. [ Links ]

Yüce, T; Dökmeci, F; Çetinkaya, SE. A prospective randomized trial comparing the use of tolterodine or weighted vaginal cones in women with overactive bladder syndrome. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2016;197:91-7. [ Links ]

Knorst, MR; Resende, TL; Santos, TG; Goldim, JR. Influência da intervenção fisioterapêutica ambulatorial sobre a musculatura do assoalho pélvico em mulheres com incontinência urinária. Braz J Phys Ther. 2013;17(5):442-9. [ Links ]

Adams, SR; Dessie, SG; Dodge, LE; Mckinney, JL; Hacker, MR; Elkadry, EA. Pelvic floor physical therapy as primary treatment of pelvic floor disorders with urinary urgency and frequency-predominant symptoms. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2015;21(5):252-6. [ Links ]

Yalcin, OT; Hassa, H; Sarac, I. Short-term intravaginal maximal electrical stimulation for refractive detrusor instability. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2002;79(3):241-4. [ Links ]

Schreiner, L; Santos, TG; Souza, ABA; Nygaard, CC; Silva Filho, IG. Electrical stimulation for urinary incontinence in women: a systematic review. Int Braz J Urol. 2013;39(4):454-64. [ Links ]

Brubaker, L. Electrical stimulation in overactive bladder. Urology. 2000;55(5A Suppl):17-23; discussion 31-2. [ Links ]

Moseley, AM; Herbert, RD; Sherrington, C; Maher, CG. Evidence for physiotherapy practice: a survey of physiotherapy evidence database (PEDro). Aust J Physiother. 2002;48(1):43-9. [ Links ]

Yamanishi, T; Yasuda, K; Sakakibara, R; Hattori, T; Suda, S. Randomized, double-blind study of electrical stimulation for urinary incontinence due to detrusor overactivity. Urology. 2000;55(3):353-7. [ Links ]

Wang, AC; Chih, SY; Chen, MC. Comparison of electric stimulation and oxybutynin chloride in management of overactive bladder with special reference to urinary urgency: a randomized placebo-controlled trial. Urology. 2006;68(5):999-1004. [ Links ]

Arruda, RM; Sousa, GC; Castro, RA; Sartori, MGF; Baracat, EC; Girão, MJBC. Hiperatividade do detrusor: comparação entre oxibutinina, eletroestimulação functional do assoalho pélvico e exercícios perineais. Estudo randomizado. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2007:29(9):452-8. [ Links ]

Ozdedeli, S; Karapolat, H; Akkoc, Y. Comparison of intravaginal electrical stimulation and trospium hydrochloride in women with overactive bladder syndrome: a randomized controlled study. Clin Rehabil. 2010;24(4):342-51. [ Links ]

Berghmans, B; van ,Waalwijk; van, Doorn E; Nieman, F; de Bie, R; van den Brandt, P; van Kerrebroeck, P. Efficacy of physical therapeutic modalities in women with proven bladder overactivity. Eur Urol. 2002;41(6):581-7. [ Links ]

Brubaker, L; Benson, JT; Bent, A; Clark, A; Shott, S. Transvaginal electrical stimulation for female urinary incontinence. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1997;177(3):536-40. [ Links ]

Smith, JJ 3rd. Intravaginal stimulation randomized trial. J Urol. 1996;155(1):127-30. [ Links ]

Siegel, SW; Richardson, DA; Miller, KL; Karram, MM; Blackwood, NB; Sand, PK; et al. Pelvic floor electrical stimulation for the treatment of urge and mixed urinary incontinence in women. Urology. 1997;50(6):934-40. [ Links ]

Bölükbaş, N; Vural, M; Karan, A; Yalçin, O; Eskiyurt, N. Effectiveness of functional magnetic versus electrical stimulation in women with urinary incontinence. Eur Med Phys. 2005;41(4):297-301. [ Links ]

Franzén, K; Johansson, JE; Lauridsen, I; Canelid, J; Heiwall, B; Nilsson, K. Electrical stimulation compared with tolterodine for treatment of urge/urge incontinence amongst women-a randomized controlled trial. Int Urogynecol J. 2010;21(12):1517-24. [ Links ]

Yamanishi, T; Sakakibara, R; Uchiyama, T; Suda, S; Hattori, T; Ito, H; et al. Comparative study of the effects of magnetic versus electrical stimulation on inhibition of detrusor overactivity. Urology2000;56(5):777-81. [ Links ]

Abdelbary, AM; El-Dessoukey, AA; Massoud, AM; Moussa, AS; Zayed, AS; Elsheikh, MG; et al. Combined Vaginal Pelvic Floor Electrical Stimulation (PFS) and Local Vaginal Estrogen for Treatment of Overactive Bladder (OAB) in Perimenopausal Females. Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT). Urology. 2015;86(3):482-6. [ Links ]

Woock, JP; Yoo, PB; Grill, WM. Mechanisms of reflex bladder activation by pudendal afferents. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2011;300(2):R398-407. [ Links ]

Spruijt, J; Vierhout, M; Verstraeten, R; Janssens, J; Burger, C. Vaginal electrical stimulation of the pelvic floor: a randomized feasibility study in urinary incontinent elderly women. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2003;82(11):1043-8. [ Links ]

Natalin, R; Lorenzeti, F; Dambros, M. Management of OAB in those over age 65. Curr Urol Rep. 2013;14(5):379-85. [ Links ]

Received: November 02, 2014; Accepted: November 09, 2015

* RFR: BS, e-mail: rafafintelman@hotmail.com

EBS: PhD, e-mail: elirezsilva@cosmevelho.com.br

Creative Commons License This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License