SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

vol.23 issue2Longitudinal clinical evaluation of post systems: a literature reviewCorrelation between maxillary central incisor crown morphology and mandibular dental arch form in normal occlusion subjects author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand



Related links

  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO


Brazilian Dental Journal

Print version ISSN 0103-6440

Braz. Dent. J. vol.23 no.2 Ribeirão Preto Mar./Apr. 2012 

Effects of chemical composition on the corrosion of dental alloys



Rodrigo GaloI; Ricardo Faria RibeiroI; Renata Cristina Silveira RodriguesI; Luís Augusto RochaII; Maria da Glória Chiarello de MattosI

IDepartment of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, Ribeirão Preto Dental School, USP - University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil
IICentre for Mechanics and Materials Technologies, Department of Mechanical Engineer, Minho University, Portugal





The aim of this study was to determine the effect of the oral environment on the corrosion of dental alloys with different compositions, using electrochemical methods. The corrosion rates were obtained from the current-potential curves and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS). The effect of artificial saliva on the corrosion of dental alloys was dependent on alloy composition. Dissolution of the ions occurred in all tested dental alloys and the results were strongly dependent on the general alloy composition. Regarding the alloys containing nickel, the Ni-Cr and Ni-Cr-Ti alloys released 0.62 mg/L of Ni on average, while the Co-Cr dental alloy released ions between 0.01 and 0.03 mg/L of Co and Cr, respectively.The open-circuit potential stabilized at a higher level with lower deviation (standard deviation: Ni-Cr-6Ti = 32 mV/SCE and Co-Cr = 54 mV/SCE). The potenciodynamic curves of the dental alloys showed that the Ni-based dental alloy with >70 wt% of Ni had a similar curve and the Co-Cr dental alloy showed a low current density and hence a high resistance to corrosion compared with the Ni-based dental alloys. Some changes in microstructure were observed and this fact influenced the corrosion behavior for the alloys. The lower corrosion resistance also led to greater release of nickel ions to the medium. The quantity of Co ions released from the Co-Cr-Mo alloy was relatively small in the solutions. In addition, the quantity of Cr ions released into the artificial saliva from the Co-Cr alloy was lower than Cr release from the Ni-based dental alloys.

KeyWords: Corrosion, metal ions, metal (alloys), surface characterization.


O objetivo deste estudo foi determinar o efeito do ambiente bucal na corrosão de diferentes ligas odontológicas, utilizando métodos eletroquímicos. Os índices de corrosão foram obtidos por meio das curvas de corrente-potencial e impedância eletroquímica (EIS). O efeito de saliva artificial na corrosão de ligas odontológicas foi dependente da composição. A dissolução dos íons ocorreu em todas as amostras e os resultados foram dependentes da composição da liga. Algumas mudanças na microestrutura foram observadas durante o estudo e influenciou o comportamento corrosivo das ligas investigadas. As ligas de Ni-Cr e Ni-Cr-Ti libertaram quantidade de 0,62 mg/L de íons Ni enquanto a liga de Co-Cr liberou entre 0,01 e 0,03 mg/L. As curvas potenciodinâmicas das ligas odontológicas mostraram que as ligas a base >70 wt% de Ni obtiveram curvas similares e a liga de Co-Cr apresentou a menor densidade de corrente e em consequência uma resistência alta a corrosão quando comparada as ligas à base de Ni. A baixa resistência à corrosão também levou a maior libertação de íons de níquel para o meio e a quantidade de Co liberado pela liga de Co-Cr-Mo foi relativamente pequena nas soluções. As quantidades de Cr liberada na saliva artificial pela liga de Co-Cr foi menor que a libertação de Cr pela liga à base de Ni.




Corrosion can be described as the deterioration of materials by aggressive action of the atmosphere and/or oral fluids. This term is used for metallic materials, and the mechanism of corrosion is mainly electrochemical when considering those environments (1). Dental alloys are generally placed in the mouth of patients for many years where they have to resist simultaneously to mechanical loads and to environmental corrosion.

The degradation of a material is said to be continuous in the mouth due to abrasion of foods, liquids and toothbrushes (2) originating metallic ions and/or debris. These ions and/or debris released from dental alloys can induce adverse biological reactions such as gingival swelling and erythema, mucosal pain or lichenoid reactions. If these ions are not tolerated by the organism, then the organism may be injured (toxicity and risk of sensitization) and if they are absorbed in sufficient quantity, clinical implant failure can happen due to osteolysis, cutaneous allergic reactions, or remote site accumulation (3).

Nickel and other metal, such as chromium and cobalt, are commonly used for the fabrication of prosthesis and substructure of metal-ceramic crowns, where fine frameworks constructions are needed (4). These substructures were introduced into dentistry as a possible replacement for precious alloys due to the increasing cost of gold throughout the 1980's (5). Dental alloys offer the advantage of allowing thinner section of the alloy to be used, and consequently less tooth sound destruction during the crown preparation.

However, dental alloys react easily with the biochemical medium in the oral cavity, and doubts remain about their biocompatibility when used in restorative procedures. Sometimes, the prostheses are placed in close proximity to the gingival and often extend sub-gingivally, where corrosion processes may cause higher adverse reactions (2). So, the selection is made depending on the clinical indication and, in case of an inadequate material selection, problems may lead to mechanical, chemical or biological failures that have undesirable consequences over time for the patient's general health (6).

Small variations of the chemical composition of dental alloys may affect the corrosion performance. From this point of view, Be-free Ni-Cr alloys are preferred for dental use (7) and extensive research has been carried out on corrosion resistance of Ni-Cr-based alloys relative to bonding composite (7). Gil et al. (8) found that the Ni-Cr-based alloy exhibits significant corrosion and that a high quantity of ions is released, and that, due to the allergic effect of Ni and Cr ions, the use of Ni-Cr-based alloys should be considered carefully.

The increase in allergies and the need for prolonged use require prostheses having less metal release (1). Therefore, in addition to considering usage conditions and duration, the behavior of metal release from each metallic biomaterial should be examinedfor proper selection of dental alloys, using various materials simulated human saliva fluids. However, there are insufficient research studies that adequately compare metal release from dental prosthesis materials using saliva under the same experimental conditions.

The aim of the this study was to evaluate the effect of the oral environment on the corrosion of dental alloys with different compositions, using electrochemical methods.



Materials and Sample Preparation

Four commercial dental alloys were evaluated, namely Ni-Cr (Vera Bond II; AALBA Dent. Inc., Fairfield, CA, USA), Ni-Cr-6Ti (ViStar; Talladium Inc., Valencia, CA, USA), Co-Cr (Remanium; Dentaurum, Pforzheim, German) and Ni-Cr-4Ti (Tilite Ômega; Talladium Inc.). The chemical composition (mass %) of the alloys determined by the manufactures is given in Table 1.



Metallic plate specimens (40 x 20 x 3 mm) were produced by the lost-wax technique in a casting machine (Discovery Plasma; EDG, São Carlos, SP, Brazil) using an electric arc melting in vacuum, under an argon atmosphere, with injection of the metal into the mould (phosphated investment Rema Exakt; Dentaurum) by vacuum pressure plasma, according to the manufacture's recommendation. Specimens were wet-ground to 2400 grade silicon carbide grinding paper (Metprep, Conventry, UK) followed by two polishing stages (3 and 1 μm) with diamond suspension (Struers, Glasgow, UK). Before testing, specimens were ultrasonically cleaned in ethanol during 10 min and in distilled water during 10 min. The samples were well dried with hot air and kept in the desiccator until the beginning of the test.

The surface roughness was measured with a profilometer (Perthometer S5P; Feinpruf Perthen, Gottingen, Germany), which contacted the surface at a constant speed of 0.05 mm/s with a force of 0.7 mN. Surface roughness was characterized by the Ra parameter, which is the arithmetical mean of the absolute values of the profile departures within the evaluated length. Statistical calculation of surface roughness independently of polishing was performed using an average of 12 surface roughness measurements parallel to the long axis at the central segment of each specimen.

Electrochemical Measurements

The electrochemical measurements were performed using a potentiostast (PGP201; Radiometer Analytical, Copenhagen, Denmark) controlled by the Voltamaster-4 software running under a computer (Voltamaster; Radiometer Analytical). The edge of the sample area was defined by pressing sample against an O-ring exposing an area of 3.64 cm2. Potentials were measured against a standard calomel electrode - SCE (B20B110; Radiometer Analytical) and a platinum plate served as the counter electrode, with an exposure area of 1 cm2 (wire B35M110; Radiometer Analytical).

Modified Fusayama's artificial solution (AS) was used as an electrolyte, consisting of NaCl (400 mg/L), KCl (400 mg/L), CaCl2.H2O (795 mg/L), NaH2PO4.H2O (690 mg/L), NaS.9H2O (5 mg/L), and urea (1000 mg/L) (Sigma Chemical Company, St. Louis, MO, USA). This solution was prepared daily by adding these chemicals to distilled water and presented a final pH of approximately 5.3. Tests were performed at 37 ± 1°C by immersing the electrochemical cell in a heated water-bath.

The corrosion potential (Ecorr) was followed during 1 h after immersion. Therefore, the potentiodynamic polarization curves were carried out from -400 mV to +1000 mV vs. SCE, at a scanning rate of 2 mV/s. The test was repeated three times with each alloy.

Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) measurements were also made using a Galvanostat-Potentiostat PGZ 100 (Radiometer Analytical), controlled by Voltamaster-4 software described before. The EIS measurements were made at the corrosion potential in the conditions described above. The frequencies for EIS measurement were chosen in the range from 100 kHz to 5 mHz with an applied sinusoidal potential of 10 mV.

An equivalent circuit was modeled and fitted to the EIS experimental data by using the Zview software (ZPlot® and ZView® for Windows Software; Scribner Associates Inc., Southern Pines, NC, USA).

Ion Concentration

Following the polarization test, 50 mL of of AS was subjected to chemical analysis using an atomic absorption spectrometer (GBC model 904AA, Scientific Equipment Pty, Victoria, Australia) . Specific lamps for the detection of Ni, Cr, Co, and Ti ions were used in the analysis.

Analyses of Surface

The surfaces of specimens were examined using a scanning electron microscope (Philips XL-30 ESEM-FEG; Eindhoven, The Netherlands) and the elemental distribution was studied using an energy-dispersive x-ray spectroscopy (EDS; Philips XL-30 ESEM-FEG).

Statistical Analysis

Data were analyzed statistically by one-way ANOVA to assess the influence of material in AS followed by Duncan test (α=0.05) for multiple comparisons. Statistical analysis was done using SPSS software version 12.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).



The evolution of the potentials recorded under open-circuit conditions for the various alloys versus time are shown in Figure 1 and all mean values and standard deviations of alloys are given in Table 2. As a general tendency, the potential slightly increased as soon as the samples were immersed in the Fusayama's solution and then stabilized after 30 min, except for the Ni-Cr-4Ti that the potential decreased versus time. The dental alloy Ni-Cr with the highest content in Ni (>70 wt%) had noble behavior (-130 to -190 mV/SCE). The Ni-Cr-4Ti alloy with less Ni (60-70 wt%) had an open-circuit potential below -190 mV/SCE. The Co-Cr dental alloy showed the lowest open-circuit potential of -300 mV/SCE.




For the Ni-Cr-6Ti and Co-Cr alloys (Fig. 1), the values obtained for the open-circuit potential after 30 min of immersion were very scattered and had a high standard deviation. After increasing the time of immersion up to 1 h, the open-circuit potential stabilized at a higher level with lower deviation (standard deviation: Ni-Cr-6Ti = 32 mV/SCE and Co-Cr = 54 mV/SCE). After 1 h, these open-circuit potential steady over time.

The potenciodynamic curves of dental alloys are presented in Figure 2. The current density is correlated with the corrosion rate. A high current density (current on the surface) at the corresponding potential indicated a high corrosion rate of the alloy. Comparison between the dental alloy curves shows that the Ni-based dental alloy with >70 wt% of Ni had a similar curve. The Co-Cr dental alloy showed a low current density and therefore a high resistance to corrosion compared with the Ni-based dental alloys.

Before the potentiodynamic polarization tests, no attack was identified on any specimen and all specimens showed heterogeneous microstructure. After the test, dissolution in the dental alloys and pits were seen on most specimens, except for the Co-Cr specimens (Fig. 3).

The EIS spectra, more specifically the Nyquist plots obtained at the open-circuit potential for the alloys in the saliva solution, during 1, 24 and 48 h are presented in Figure 4. The corresponding Rp values are listed in Table 3.



As shown in Figure 4, all specimens were approximately characterized by one large semicircle. The diameter of the semicircle for Co-Cr specimens was larger than that of the other specimens. As listed in Table 3, the Rp in the 1-h period was significantly different for Ni-Cr-4Ti (p≤0.05); it was less than 0.13 M?-cm2. In the 1-day experiment, the same situation was observed, where the Ni-Cr-4Ti was significantly different (p≤0.05) from the other alloys. In day 2, the Rp increased for all the alloys, except for Co-Cr, but it was not statistically different from the other days. Based on visual observation and impedance spectra, the corrosion behavior was modeled by an equivalent circuit (Fig. 5).



After immersion in the saliva solution, the alloys released some metallic ions (Table 4). The Ni-Cr and Ni-Cr-Ti alloys released 0.62 mg/L of Ni-ions and 0.07 mg/L of Cr-ions on average. The Ti concentration in AS was below the detection limit (0.05 mgL/L). The Co-Cr alloy released between 0.01 and 0.03 mg/L of Co and Cr ions, respectively.




The importance of the corrosion tests in dentistry has increased because the oral galvanic actions may cause a series of reactions starting from a metal taste, oral burning, oral pain, sensitizations, allergies and other toxic reactions (9). Dental alloys require both biomedical safety and biomechanical compatibility. In terms of biomechanical compatibility, it is necessary that the mechanical properties and corrosion resistance do not degrade over prolonged use. In particular, high corrosion resistance, resulting in low or negligible ion release, is a requirement for dental alloys.

Generally a high open-circuit potential value indicates a high tendency to resist to corrosion. Ni-based dental alloys have high open-circuit potential, thus they all have a high tendency to resist to corrosion. However, when the material has a low open-circuit potential such as dental alloys with Ti and Cr, there are two possible reasons: 1. either the metal has the tendency to oxidize or form soluble compounds (then it is very corrodible), 2. or the metal forms insoluble products, mostly oxide layers on the surface, which minimizes the corrosion and results in highly resistant material (e.g.: Ti) (10). Ni-based dental alloys had negative open-circuit potential values but not very low (≈ -180 mV/SCE). Some alloys with high Ni content (>70 wt%) showed higher open-circuit potential values than Co-Cr, for example Ni-Cr (Fig. 1).

Reclaru et al. (11) demonstrated that some Co-Cr dental alloys do not have a higher corrosion resistance. However, this is not consistent with the observations of Sun et al. (12), who found that Co-Cr alloy presented better corrosion behavior than Ni-based dental alloys, due to Cr and Mo contents (13).

For determination of corrosion resistance, it is not sufficient only to consider the open-circuit potential to resistance to corrosion of dental alloys, especially due to the short immersion time of 2 h, according to ISO 10271 standard. The polarization curves were found to be very appropriate to study the entire resistance to corrosion.

The current densities of corrosion measured were low for the Co-Cr dental alloy (0.02 μA/cm2). However, the Ni-based dental alloys show more susceptible to corrosion. The Ni-based alloys showed a corrosion process that was related to the corrosive media. These results showed that dental alloys with Ni and Cr are the most corrosive element in AS.

Generally, corrosion resistance is due to the formation of a protective passive layer (oxide). The stronger the passive layer, the better the corrosion resistance of a dental alloy. The quantity of released metal changes markedly depending on the nature and strength of the metal-oxide bond, structure (vacancies, interstitial elements, degree of ordering), role of alloying element, composition and thickness of oxide layers (1). The role of alloying element in a passive layer formed on the presence of Cr and Mo in Ni-based dental casting alloys makes them more corrosion resistant by the formation of a surface oxide layer (14,15). It has been reported that only Ni-based dental alloys containing 16% to 27% Cr develop an adequate protective oxide layer (15). Although among the tested Ni-based dental alloys only Ni-Cr-4Ti alloy had an adequate Cr content, no differences in corrosion behavior were detected. On the other hand, Mo also has an active role in the formation of this protective oxide layer. Thus, an increasing concentration of Cr and Mo on the surface layer may synergistically lower metal dissolution rates (14), which may subsequently reduce the cytotoxicity of the alloys.

The SEM analysis (Fig. 3) showed that the corrosion process initially occurs on the surface. Pits may be the result of the dissolution of the precipitates of the AS or, respectively, their detachment due to the dissolution. The Co-Cr surface itself did not show any evidence of significant corrosion. The Ni-based dental alloys presented a more severely corroded surface, with the formation of a typical surface morphology of a uniform corrosion with the dissolution of the corrosion products. Visually, the surface was blackened. In the Ni-based dental alloys, corrosion was observed in the area around of Ti element, but it did not remove the Ti nor this element stopped the corrosion process.

The impedance of surface layer on metal can be larger than of change transfer reaction of metal, leading to the disappearance of the impedance of metal's charge transfer reaction in the Nyquist plot (13). In other words, when a protection surface film is formed on metal, the metal impedance corresponds to the impedance of surface passive layer because the impedance of metal's charge transfer reaction is relatively small and can thus be neglected. In this study, the semicircle observed in the Nyquist plot for each specimen (Fig. 4) was mainly described to the presence of the surface passive layer. Therefore, the Rp values obtained from the Nyquist plot mainly represented the corrosion resistance of passive layer, and the model made it possible to obtain an order of magnitude for the polarization resistance values.

As shown in Table 3, the Rp values for all specimens were higher than 0.1 M?/cm2, being the Co-Cr specimen the one that presents the highest value (≈ 0.6 M?/cm2). Huang (16) found that Rp of Ni-based dental alloy in AS is around 1 M?/cm2, with an acceptable corrosion resistance that related to the compositional difference in the passive layer. Therefore, the passive layers formed in the alloys used in this study exhibited a lower corrosion resistance in the AS. However, Co-Cr alloy has better corrosion resistance (Rp) than Ni-based alloys, due to a stronger surface oxide layer (17).

However, after 2 days, the dental alloys did not show any difference in the Rp values. The presence of Cr in the alloy can improve the corrosion resistance in this corrosion environment due to the formation of a Cr-rich passive oxide layer, which had a higher resistance to acid attack. In other studies (13,15), Ni-based dental alloys had stronger corrosion resistance, due to an important role which Cr and Mo plays in the corrosion resistance of this alloy.

The corrosion products analyzed by a graphite-furnace atomic absorption spectrometer showed that the Ni ion was the element found in the greatest quantity. In particular, the same areas are related directly with the element Ni, which explains the blackened surface. The Ni-Cr-4Ti dental alloy was more susceptible to corrosion and is thus likely to release more metal ions to the oral environment, which can generate allergic problems (8,14). However, adverse reactions to Ni were shown to be more common in extraoral than intraoral applications (18). Other authors (19) found that the lower level of Ni released compared with other studies (20) may be below the threshold required for triggering an allergic reaction, at least in subjects without historyof sensitization to the metal.

This study demonstrated the importance of the content of different components in dental alloys. The presence of higher Cr (25 wt.%) in the bulk alloy led to higher corrosion resistance compared with a lower Cr (12 wt.%) content. Some changes in microstructure were observed during the study and influenced the corrosion behavior of the tested alloys. The lower corrosion resistance also led to a greater release of Ni ions to the medium and the quantity of Co ions released from the Co-Cr-Mo dental alloy was relatively small in the solutions.



The authors acknowledge CAPES for financial support.



1.Okazakia Y, Gotoh E. Comparison of metal release from various metallic biomaterials in vitro. Biomaterials 2005;26:11-21.         [ Links ]

2.Schmalz G. Materials science: biological aspects. J Dent Res 2002;81:660-663.         [ Links ]

3.Molina C, Nogués L, Martinez-Gomis J, Peraire M, Salsench J, Sevilla P, et al.. Dental casting alloys circuit during power toothbrushing with toothpastes of various abrasivities. Part II: corrosion and ion release. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2008;19:3015-3019.         [ Links ]

4.Anusavice KJ. In: Phillips' science of dental materials. London: Saunders; 2003. pp. 594.         [ Links ]

5.Leinfelder KF. An evaluation of casting alloys used for restorative procedures. J Am Dent Assoc 1997;128:37-45.         [ Links ]

6.Mareci D, Nemtoi G, Aelenei N, Bocanu C. The electrochemical behavior of various non-precious Ni and Co based alloys in artificial saliva. Eur Cell Mater 2005;10:1-7, discussion 1-7.         [ Links ]

7.Geis-Gerstorfer J, Pässler K. Studies on the influence of Be content on the corrosion behavior and mechanical properties of Ni-25Cr-10Mo alloys. Dent Mater 1993;9:177-181.         [ Links ]

8.Gil FJ, Sánchez LA, Espías A, Planell JÁ. In vitro corrosion behavior and metallic ion release of different prosthodontic alloys. Int Dent J 1999;49:361-367.         [ Links ]

9.Kedici PS, Memiko?lu MM, Kansu G, Iºimer A, Günhan O. Case report: ionisation tendency of a base metal alloy in the oral environment. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent 1995;3:231-234.         [ Links ]

10.Kuphasuk C, Oshida Y, Andres CJ, Hovijitra ST, Barco MT, Brown DT. Electrochemical corrosion of titanium and titanium-based alloys. J Prosthet Dent 2001;85:195-202.         [ Links ]

11.Reclaru L, Lüthy H, Eschler PY, Blatter A, Susz C. Corrosion behavior of cobalt-chromium dental alloys doped with precious metals. Biomaterials 2005;26:4358-4365.         [ Links ]

12.Sun EX, Fine S, Nowak WB. Electrochemical behavior of nitinol alloy in Ringer's solution. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2002;13:959-964.         [ Links ]

13.Huang HH. Effect of chemical composition on the corrosion behavior of Ni-Cr-Mo dental casting alloys. J Biomed Mater Res 2002;5:458-465.         [ Links ]

14.Brune D. Mechanisms and kinetics of metal release from dental alloys. Int Endod J 1988;21:135-142.         [ Links ]

15.Bumgardner JD, Lucas LC. Surface analysis of nickel-chromium dental alloys. Dent Mater 1993;9:252-259.         [ Links ]

16.Huang HH. Corrosion resistance of stressed NiTi and stainless steel orthodontic wires in acid artificial saliva. J Biomed Mater Res A 2003;66:829-839.         [ Links ]

17.Goldberg JR, Gilbert JL. The electrochemical and mechanical behavior of passivated and TiN/AlN-coated CoCrMo and Ti6Al4V alloys. Biomaterials 2004;25:851-864.         [ Links ]

18.Jacobsen N, Hensten-Pettersen A. Occupational health problems and adverse patient reactions in periodontics. J Clin Periodontol 1989;16:428-433.         [ Links ]

19.Bass JK, Fine H, Cisneros GJ. Nickel hypersensitivity in the orthodontic patient. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1993;103:280-285.         [ Links ]

20.Schiff N, Grosgogeat B, Lissac M, Dalard F. Influence of fluoride content and pH on the corrosion resistance of titanium and its alloys. Biomaterials 2002;23:1995-2002.         [ Links ]




Profa. Dra. Maria da Glória Chiarello de Mattos,
Departamento de Materiais Dentários e Prótese,
Faculdade de Odontologia de Ribeirão Preto,
Universidade de São Paulo, Avenida do Café S/N, Monte Alegre,
14040-904 Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brasil.
Tel: +55-16-3602-4098.
Fax: +55-016-3602-4780.

Received January 30, 2010
Accepted February 8, 2012