Comunicação de riscos tecnológicos ambientais

Martini Júnior, Luiz Carlos de

doi:10.1590/S0103-65131995000200002

Resumos

O crescente interesse público pelos riscos de impactos ambientais negativos provocados por resíduos industriais tornou a Comunicação de Risco um elemento decisivo no gerenciamento da atividade industrial, sendo importante o reconhecimento do contexto social que envolve o uso de uma tecnologia e a percepção do risco desta tecnologia nas relações sociais. O trabalho apresenta a evolução do processo de planejamento estratégico da Comunicação de Risco e indica as ações que estimulam a interação entre os segmentos impactados por incidentes catastróficos em indústrias químicas.

Risco; Comunicação de Risco; Gerenciamento Ambiental

The growing public interest in negative environmental impact risks caused by industrial waste has turned Risk Communication into a decisive element to industrial management. So, that has become important to recognize the social context which involves the use of a technology and the public perception of the risk. This paper presents the process evolution of strategical planning of Risk Communication and indicates the actions which stimulate the interaction between the segments affected by catastrophic incidents in the chemical industry.

Risk; Risk Communication; Environmental Management

Comunicação de riscos tecnológicos ambientais

Luiz Carlos de Martini Júnior

Engenheiro da NITRIFLEX S.A. Mestrando da COPPE-UFRJ - Programa de Engenharia de Produção. Rua Paraná, s/n. Duque de Caxias - RJ. 25221-000. Brasil, tel. (021)776-1842

RESUMO

O crescente interesse público pelos riscos de impactos ambientais negativos provocados por resíduos industriais tornou a Comunicação de Risco um elemento decisivo no gerenciamento da atividade industrial, sendo importante o reconhecimento do contexto social que envolve o uso de uma tecnologia e a percepção do risco desta tecnologia nas relações sociais. O trabalho apresenta a evolução do processo de planejamento estratégico da Comunicação de Risco e indica as ações que estimulam a interação entre os segmentos impactados por incidentes catastróficos em indústrias químicas.

Palavras-Chave: Risco, Comunicação de Risco, Gerenciamento Ambiental.

ABSTRACT

The growing public interest in negative environmental impact risks caused by industrial waste has turned Risk Communication into a decisive element to industrial management. So, that has become important to recognize the social context which involves the use of a technology and the public perception of the risk. This paper presents the process evolution of strategical planning of Risk Communication and indicates the actions which stimulate the interaction between the segments affected by catastrophic incidents in the chemical industry.

Key Words: Risk , Risk Communication, Environmental Management

Texto completo disponível apenas em PDF.

Full text available only in PDF format.

Bibliografia Sugerida

BRADBURY, J.A. The Policy Implications of Differing Concepts of Risk. Science, Technology and Human Values. 14, 4,1989, pp. 380 - 399.
DE MARCHI, B. The Sevezo Directive: An Italian Pilot Study in Enabling Communication. Risk Analysis. 11, 2, 1991, pp. 207-215.
FISCHHOFF, B. et al. Defining Risk. Policy Science. 17, pp. 124 - 139.
FISHER, A. Risk Communication Challenges . Risk Analysis. 11, 2, 1991, pp. 173 - 179.
FREITAS, C. M. & MELLO, J. M. C. Interesses Sociais e AvaliaçÆo Técnica de Risco: O caso do Metanol. Lua Nova - Revista de Cultura e Política. 31, 1993, pp. 167 - 179.
GOLDING, D. et al. Evaluating Risk Communication: Narrative vs. Techincal Presentations of Information about Radon. Risk Analysis. 12, 1, 1992, pp. 27 - 35.
KEENEY, R.L. & VON WINTERFELDT, D. Improving Risk Communication. Risk Analysis. 6, 4, 1986.
LAIRD, F. N. The Decline of Deference: The Political Context of Risk Communication. Risk Analysis. 9, 4, 1989, pp. 543 - 550.
LUCAS, A. Preparing for the Worst Case Scenarios. Chemicalweek. jun 24, 1994, pp. 34 - 36.
O'RIORDAN, T. et al. Themes and Tasks of Risk Communication: Report of an International Conference Held at KFA Jülich. Risk Analysis. 9, 4, 1989, pp. 513-518.
STEVENS, A. And now for the bad news. Chemical Engineering, nov. 26, 1984, pp. 99- 102.
WALKER, J. L. Dealing with the media in a chemical emergency. Chemical Engineering. Dez. 27, 1982, pp. 61 - 62.
WETERINGS, R. A.P.M. & VAN EIJNDHOVEN, J. C.M. Informing the Public About Uncertain Risks. Risk Analysis. 9, 4, 1989, pp.473 - 482.
WYNNE, B. Risk Perception, Decision Analysis, and the Public Acceptance Problem, in WYNNE, B. Risk Management and Hazardous Waste Implementation and dialecties of Credibility. Berlim, Springer - Verlag. 1987, pp. 356 - 396.
CHESS, C; HANCE, B.; & SANDMAN, P. Planning Dialogue with Communities: Risk Communication Workbook.Environmental Communication Res. Program, Rutgers Univ., New Brunswick, New Jersei, june 1989.
DIAS, V. Como virar noticia e não se arrepender no dia seguinte. Ed. Objetiva. Rio de Janeiro. 1994. 133 p.
LAGADEC, P. La Civilisation du Risque - Catastrophes Techmologiques et Responsabilité Sociale. Ed. du Seuil, Paris, 1981.
PERROW, C. Normal Accidents - Living with high-risk technologies. Basic Books Inc., New York, 1984.
SLOVIC, P. Perception of Risk. Science, 236-280. 1987.

Datas de Publicação

Publicação nesta coleção
27 Out 2010
Data do Fascículo
Dez 1995

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

[1] BRADBURY, J.A. The Policy Implications of Differing Concepts of Risk. Science, Technology and Human Values. 14, 4,1989, pp. 380 - 399.

[2] DE MARCHI, B. The Sevezo Directive: An Italian Pilot Study in Enabling Communication. Risk Analysis. 11, 2, 1991, pp. 207-215.

[3] FISCHHOFF, B. et al. Defining Risk. Policy Science. 17, pp. 124 - 139.

[4] FISHER, A. Risk Communication Challenges . Risk Analysis. 11, 2, 1991, pp. 173 - 179.

[5] FREITAS, C. M. & MELLO, J. M. C. Interesses Sociais e AvaliaçÆo Técnica de Risco: O caso do Metanol. Lua Nova - Revista de Cultura e Política. 31, 1993, pp. 167 - 179.

[6] GOLDING, D. et al. Evaluating Risk Communication: Narrative vs. Techincal Presentations of Information about Radon. Risk Analysis. 12, 1, 1992, pp. 27 - 35.

[7] KEENEY, R.L. & VON WINTERFELDT, D. Improving Risk Communication. Risk Analysis. 6, 4, 1986.

[8] LAIRD, F. N. The Decline of Deference: The Political Context of Risk Communication. Risk Analysis. 9, 4, 1989, pp. 543 - 550.

[9] LUCAS, A. Preparing for the Worst Case Scenarios. Chemicalweek. jun 24, 1994, pp. 34 - 36.

[10] O'RIORDAN, T. et al. Themes and Tasks of Risk Communication: Report of an International Conference Held at KFA Jülich. Risk Analysis. 9, 4, 1989, pp. 513-518.

[11] STEVENS, A. And now for the bad news. Chemical Engineering, nov. 26, 1984, pp. 99- 102.

[12] WALKER, J. L. Dealing with the media in a chemical emergency. Chemical Engineering. Dez. 27, 1982, pp. 61 - 62.

[13] WETERINGS, R. A.P.M. & VAN EIJNDHOVEN, J. C.M. Informing the Public About Uncertain Risks. Risk Analysis. 9, 4, 1989, pp.473 - 482.

[14] WYNNE, B. Risk Perception, Decision Analysis, and the Public Acceptance Problem, in WYNNE, B. Risk Management and Hazardous Waste Implementation and dialecties of Credibility. Berlim, Springer - Verlag. 1987, pp. 356 - 396.

[15] CHESS, C; HANCE, B.; & SANDMAN, P. Planning Dialogue with Communities: Risk Communication Workbook.Environmental Communication Res. Program, Rutgers Univ., New Brunswick, New Jersei, june 1989.

[16] DIAS, V. Como virar noticia e não se arrepender no dia seguinte. Ed. Objetiva. Rio de Janeiro. 1994. 133 p.

[17] LAGADEC, P. La Civilisation du Risque - Catastrophes Techmologiques et Responsabilité Sociale. Ed. du Seuil, Paris, 1981.

[18] PERROW, C. Normal Accidents - Living with high-risk technologies. Basic Books Inc., New York, 1984.

[19] SLOVIC, P. Perception of Risk. Science, 236-280. 1987.